• Microsoft .NET Desktop Runtime 8 ???

    From T@T@invalid.invalid to alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Fri May 22 21:49:52 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    Hi All,

    I have to do VulnDetet updates of vulnerable programs once
    a week on several customers as part of PCI testing.

    One customer has to get "Microsoft .NET Desktop Runtime 8",
    the long term supported version, updated every month because
    of some security this or that.

    Is there something about Microsoft .NET Desktop Runtime 8 I
    should know? Is it really such a security nightmare?

    Yours in Confusion,
    -T
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From ....winston@winstonmvp@gmail.com to alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Sat May 23 01:16:06 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On 05/23/2026 12:49 AM, T wrote:
    Hi All,

    I have to do VulnDetet updates of vulnerable programs once
    a week on several customers as part of PCI testing.

    One customer has to get "Microsoft .NET Desktop Runtime 8",
    the long term supported version, updated every month because
    of some security this or that.

    Is there something about Microsoft .NET Desktop Runtime 8 I
    should know?  Is it really such a security nightmare?

    Yours in Confusion,
    -T

    Was the 'some security this or that' your customer's or your words?


    It's basically been on a monthly cumulative update cycle(like Windows)
    since RTM(Nov 2023), though no updates have occurred in the month of Dec.

    Fyi....There's a 8.0 Runtime and SDK?

    <https://dotnet.microsoft.com/en-us/download/dotnet/8.0>
    - see above link - after reading, you might ask your customer more
    questions on what they need and/or what they are using .NET

    Long term supported(LTS) version?
    8.0 LTS is 3 years (See above RTM date)
    - i.e. do the math, support will end this year(typically like other
    MSFT software, in the fall - Oct or Nov. You can Google or Bing for the actual date.
    --
    ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Sat May 23 02:34:49 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On Sat, 5/23/2026 12:49 AM, T wrote:
    Hi All,

    I have to do VulnDetet updates of vulnerable programs once
    a week on several customers as part of PCI testing.

    One customer has to get "Microsoft .NET Desktop Runtime 8",
    the long term supported version, updated every month because
    of some security this or that.

    Is there something about Microsoft .NET Desktop Runtime 8 I
    should know?  Is it really such a security nightmare?

    Yours in Confusion,
    -T

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET

    "Versioning practice

    .NET Core Runtime roughly uses semantic versioning, the major.minor.patch format.
    ...
    Patch versions are given for bug fixes, new platform support,
    or other changes not included above.[37]

    That means the reason for issue, may not be purely CVE based.

    Paul


    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From T@T@invalid.invalid to alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Sat May 23 00:04:39 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On 5/22/26 11:34 PM, Paul wrote:
    On Sat, 5/23/2026 12:49 AM, T wrote:
    Hi All,

    I have to do VulnDetet updates of vulnerable programs once
    a week on several customers as part of PCI testing.

    One customer has to get "Microsoft .NET Desktop Runtime 8",
    the long term supported version, updated every month because
    of some security this or that.

    Is there something about Microsoft .NET Desktop Runtime 8 I
    should know?  Is it really such a security nightmare?

    Yours in Confusion,
    -T

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET

    "Versioning practice

    .NET Core Runtime roughly uses semantic versioning, the major.minor.patch format.
    ...
    Patch versions are given for bug fixes, new platform support,
    or other changes not included above.[37]

    That means the reason for issue, may not be purely CVE based.

    Paul




    https://ibb.co/Pz0rNXPm

    Month after month after month after ...
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Sat May 23 04:21:38 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On Sat, 5/23/2026 3:04 AM, T wrote:
    On 5/22/26 11:34 PM, Paul wrote:
    On Sat, 5/23/2026 12:49 AM, T wrote:
    Hi All,

    I have to do VulnDetet updates of vulnerable programs once
    a week on several customers as part of PCI testing.

    One customer has to get "Microsoft .NET Desktop Runtime 8",
    the long term supported version, updated every month because
    of some security this or that.

    Is there something about Microsoft .NET Desktop Runtime 8 I
    should know?  Is it really such a security nightmare?

    Yours in Confusion,
    -T

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET

       "Versioning practice

        .NET Core Runtime roughly uses semantic versioning, the major.minor.patch format.
        ...
        Patch versions are given for bug fixes, new platform support,
        or other changes not included above.[37]

    That means the reason for issue, may not be purely CVE based.

        Paul




    https://ibb.co/Pz0rNXPm

    Month after month after month after ...

    Notable Changes
    .NET 8.0.27 release carries security and non-security fixes.

    CVE-2026-32177 | .NET Denial of Service Vulnerability

    Microsoft is releasing this security advisory to provide information about a
    vulnerability in .NET 8.0, .NET 9.0, and .NET 10.0. This advisory also provides
    guidance on what developers can do to update their applications to remove this vulnerability.

    Heap-based buffer overflow in .NET allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network.

    CVE-2026-35433 | .NET Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

    Microsoft is releasing this security advisory to provide information about
    a vulnerability in .NET 8.0, .NET 9.0, and .NET 10.0. This advisory also
    provides guidance on what developers can do to update their applications to remove this vulnerability.

    Improper input validation in .NET allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

    CVE-2026-32175 | .NET Core Tampering Vulnerability

    Microsoft is releasing this security advisory to provide information
    about a vulnerability in .NET 8.0, .NET 9.0, and .NET 10.0. This advisory
    also provides guidance on what developers can do to update their applications
    to remove this vulnerability.

    A tampering vulnerability exists when .NET Core improperly handles specially
    crafted files. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could
    write arbitrary files and directories to certain locations on a vulnerable system.
    However, an attacker would have limited control over the destination of the files and directories.

    To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker must send a specially crafted file to a vulnerable system.

    The security update fixes the vulnerability by ensuring .NET Core properly handles files.

    CVE-2026-42899 | ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability

    Microsoft is releasing this security advisory to provide information
    about a vulnerability in .NET 8.0, .NET 9.0, and .NET 10.0. This advisory
    also provides guidance on what developers can do to update their
    applications to remove this vulnerability.

    Loop with unreachable exit condition ('infinite loop') in ASP.NET Core allows
    an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network.

    *******

    As a rolling release, you have to expect some level of patching
    to be going on.

    Look at how many patches the Windows kernel has received.
    That's a "hot-spot".

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From ....winston@winstonmvp@gmail.com to alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Sat May 23 10:22:45 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On 05/23/2026 2:34 AM, Paul wrote:
    On Sat, 5/23/2026 12:49 AM, T wrote:
    Hi All,

    I have to do VulnDetet updates of vulnerable programs once
    a week on several customers as part of PCI testing.

    One customer has to get "Microsoft .NET Desktop Runtime 8",
    the long term supported version, updated every month because
    of some security this or that.

    Is there something about Microsoft .NET Desktop Runtime 8 I
    should know?  Is it really such a security nightmare?

    Yours in Confusion,
    -T

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET

    "Versioning practice

    .NET Core Runtime roughly uses semantic versioning, the major.minor.patch format.
    ...
    Patch versions are given for bug fixes, new platform support,
    or other changes not included above.[37]

    That means the reason for issue, may not be purely CVE based.

    Paul



    Not unusual for security updates, but as noted platform and code changes
    are included in each and every monthly update(typically/routinely
    once/mo. except in Dec.)

    Also, basically a legacy product. Support ends this year. Migration to
    .NET 10 is necessary to maintain the LTS(Long Term Support) path.

    i.e. The customer and computer support personnel should be looking
    forward rather than concern for security updates included in .NET 8.0
    monthly updates.
    --
    ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kerr-Mudd, John@admin@127.0.0.1 to alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Sun May 24 12:12:31 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On Sat, 23 May 2026 10:22:45 -0400
    "....winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 05/23/2026 2:34 AM, Paul wrote:
    On Sat, 5/23/2026 12:49 AM, T wrote:
    Hi All,

    I have to do VulnDetet updates of vulnerable programs once
    a week on several customers as part of PCI testing.

    One customer has to get "Microsoft .NET Desktop Runtime 8",
    the long term supported version, updated every month because
    of some security this or that.

    Is there something about Microsoft .NET Desktop Runtime 8 I
    should know?  Is it really such a security nightmare?

    Yours in Confusion,
    -T

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET

    "Versioning practice

    .NET Core Runtime roughly uses semantic versioning, the major.minor.patch format.
    ...
    Patch versions are given for bug fixes, new platform support,
    or other changes not included above.[37]

    That means the reason for issue, may not be purely CVE based.

    Paul



    Not unusual for security updates, but as noted platform and code changes
    are included in each and every monthly update(typically/routinely
    once/mo. except in Dec.)

    Also, basically a legacy product. Support ends this year. Migration to
    .NET 10 is necessary to maintain the LTS(Long Term Support) path.

    i.e. The customer and computer support personnel should be looking
    forward rather than concern for security updates included in .NET 8.0 monthly updates.

    I spurned DotNet bloat when it first raised it's ugly MS-locked-in head.
    --
    Bah, and indeed Humbug.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From T@T@invalid.invalid to alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Sun May 24 15:20:10 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On 5/24/26 4:12 AM, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
    On Sat, 23 May 2026 10:22:45 -0400
    "....winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 05/23/2026 2:34 AM, Paul wrote:
    On Sat, 5/23/2026 12:49 AM, T wrote:
    Hi All,

    I have to do VulnDetet updates of vulnerable programs once
    a week on several customers as part of PCI testing.

    One customer has to get "Microsoft .NET Desktop Runtime 8",
    the long term supported version, updated every month because
    of some security this or that.

    Is there something about Microsoft .NET Desktop Runtime 8 I
    should know?  Is it really such a security nightmare?

    Yours in Confusion,
    -T

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET

    "Versioning practice

    .NET Core Runtime roughly uses semantic versioning, the major.minor.patch format.
    ...
    Patch versions are given for bug fixes, new platform support,
    or other changes not included above.[37]

    That means the reason for issue, may not be purely CVE based.

    Paul



    Not unusual for security updates, but as noted platform and code changes
    are included in each and every monthly update(typically/routinely
    once/mo. except in Dec.)

    Also, basically a legacy product. Support ends this year. Migration to
    .NET 10 is necessary to maintain the LTS(Long Term Support) path.

    i.e. The customer and computer support personnel should be looking
    forward rather than concern for security updates included in .NET 8.0
    monthly updates.



    I spurned DotNet bloat when it first raised it's ugly MS-locked-in head.


    Dot Net gives me the creeps too.

    As of last week,
    https://dotnet.microsoft.com/en-us/download/dotnet
    M$ only listed 8 as "Long Term Support". It now lists
    10 as also having long term support.

    And I am not up to finding out what programs they are
    running require what version of dot net. If 8 is working
    for them, then that is the one to keep, until long term
    support is discontinued. There is no sign of that.



    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Sun May 24 21:14:07 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On Sun, 5/24/2026 6:20 PM, T wrote:
    On 5/24/26 4:12 AM, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
    On Sat, 23 May 2026 10:22:45 -0400
    "....winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 05/23/2026 2:34 AM, Paul wrote:
    On Sat, 5/23/2026 12:49 AM, T wrote:
    Hi All,

    I have to do VulnDetet updates of vulnerable programs once
    a week on several customers as part of PCI testing.

    One customer has to get "Microsoft .NET Desktop Runtime 8",
    the long term supported version, updated every month because
    of some security this or that.

    Is there something about Microsoft .NET Desktop Runtime 8 I
    should know?  Is it really such a security nightmare?

    Yours in Confusion,
    -T

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET

        "Versioning practice

         .NET Core Runtime roughly uses semantic versioning, the major.minor.patch format.
         ...
         Patch versions are given for bug fixes, new platform support, >>>>      or other changes not included above.[37]

    That means the reason for issue, may not be purely CVE based.

         Paul



    Not unusual for security updates, but as noted platform and code changes >>> are included in each and every monthly update(typically/routinely
    once/mo. except in Dec.)

    Also, basically a legacy product. Support ends this year. Migration to
    .NET 10 is necessary to maintain the LTS(Long Term Support) path.

    i.e. The customer and computer support personnel should be looking
    forward rather than concern for security updates included in .NET 8.0
    monthly updates.



    I spurned DotNet bloat when it first raised it's ugly MS-locked-in head.


    Dot Net gives me the creeps too.

    As of last week,
        https://dotnet.microsoft.com/en-us/download/dotnet
    M$ only listed 8 as "Long Term Support".  It now lists
    10 as also having long term support.

    And I am not up to finding out what programs they are
    running require what version of dot net.  If 8 is working
    for them, then that is the one to keep, until long term
    support is discontinued.  There is no sign of that.


    Here is an untested script from CoPilot.

    This initially started using the following CoPilot Question.

    ******************** CoPilot Question *******************

    How can I scan C: for dotnet assemblies and get specific version information for the programs using such assemblies ?

    For example, an IT person notices that .net core version 8 is installed
    on a modern Windows OS, and one thing (Intel DSA, something to do with updating an
    Intel graphics driver) seems to have caused .net core version 8 to be installed.
    How can that IT person scan the C: drive and determine it is the Intel
    product and which precise executable which is doing it ?

    ******************** END: CoPilot Question *******************

    This is the script it eventually created. Note that some of the
    Windows Apps are stored in Access Denied areas and Administrator
    Elevation is unlikely to get you in there. Perhaps running the
    script as TrustedInstaller would cover off the missing bits (not
    on your customer machine, that suggestion is purely to see
    how or if this script works worth a damn).

    ******************** Scan-DotNetAssemblies.ps1 ************************

    <#
    Scan-DotNetAssemblies.ps1
    Scans C:\ for .NET assemblies, extracts TargetFramework,
    maps assemblies to installed programs, and outputs a CSV
    listing all assemblies requiring .NET 8.

    Also logs directories where access is denied.


    $ErrorActionPreference = "SilentlyContinue"

    Write-Host "Scanning installed programs..." -ForegroundColor Cyan

    # --- Collect installed program info from registry ---
    $installedPrograms = @{}

    $uninstallPaths = @(
    "HKLM:\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall",
    "HKLM:\Software\WOW6432Node\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall"
    )

    foreach ($path in $uninstallPaths) {
    if (Test-Path $path) {
    Get-ChildItem $path | ForEach-Object {
    $p = Get-ItemProperty $_.PsPath
    if ($p.DisplayName -and $p.InstallLocation) {
    $installedPrograms[$p.InstallLocation.TrimEnd('\')] = $p.DisplayName
    }
    }
    }
    }

    Write-Host "Installed program entries loaded: $($installedPrograms.Count)" -ForegroundColor Green

    # --- Prepare output collections ---
    $results = New-Object System.Collections.Generic.List[Object]
    $accessDenied = New-Object System.Collections.Generic.List[String]

    Write-Host "Scanning C:\ for .NET assemblies..." -ForegroundColor Cyan

    # --- Enumerate files safely, capturing access-denied directories ---
    try {
    $files = Get-ChildItem -Path "C:\" -Recurse -Include *.dll, *.exe -ErrorAction Stop
    }
    catch {
    # We need a manual walker to capture access-denied paths
    function Safe-Enumerate($path) {
    try {
    Get-ChildItem $path -ErrorAction Stop | ForEach-Object {
    if ($_.PSIsContainer) {
    Safe-Enumerate $_.FullName
    } else {
    if ($_.Extension -in ".dll", ".exe") {
    $_
    }
    }
    }
    }
    catch {
    $accessDenied.Add($path)
    }
    }

    $files = Safe-Enumerate "C:\"
    }

    Write-Host "Files found: $($files.Count)" -ForegroundColor Green

    # --- Function to extract TargetFramework ---
    function Get-TargetFramework($path) {
    try {
    $asm = [System.Reflection.Assembly]::LoadFile($path)

    $tfm = $asm.CustomAttributes |
    Where-Object { $_.AttributeType.FullName -eq "System.Runtime.Versioning.TargetFrameworkAttribute" } |
    Select-Object -ExpandProperty ConstructorArguments -ErrorAction Ignore |
    Select-Object -ExpandProperty Value -ErrorAction Ignore

    return $tfm
    }
    catch {
    return $null
    }
    }

    # --- Function to map file to installed program ---
    function Map-ToProgram($filePath) {
    $dir = Split-Path $filePath -Parent

    foreach ($installPath in $installedPrograms.Keys) {
    if ($dir -like "$installPath*") {
    return $installedPrograms[$installPath]
    }
    }

    return "(No matching installed program)"
    }

    Write-Host "Analyzing assemblies..." -ForegroundColor Cyan

    foreach ($file in $files) {
    $tfm = Get-TargetFramework $file.FullName

    if ($tfm -and $tfm -match "net8") {
    $program = Map-ToProgram $file.FullName

    $results.Add([PSCustomObject]@{
    FilePath = $file.FullName
    TargetFramework = $tfm
    Program = $program
    })
    }
    }

    # --- Output CSV ---
    $outFile = "$env:USERPROFILE\Desktop\DotNet8_Assemblies.csv"
    $results | Export-Csv -Path $outFile -NoTypeInformation -Encoding UTF8

    # --- Output access-denied log ---
    $denyFile = "$env:USERPROFILE\Desktop\AccessDenied_Directories.txt" $accessDenied | Sort-Object -Unique | Out-File $denyFile -Encoding UTF8

    Write-Host ""
    Write-Host "Scan complete!" -ForegroundColor Green
    Write-Host "Results saved to: $outFile"
    Write-Host "Access-denied directories saved to: $denyFile"

    ******************** END: Scan-DotNetAssemblies.ps1 ************************

    You can see that's not much of a scan, as it does not look "everywhere",
    it looks in curated places. A program must be "installed" to be note-worthy
    to the scanner.

    If you need ammunition, start with a junk install on a physical machine
    (the kind of junk installs I do on my other computers when a VM
    install will not suffice), and you may be able to "spot" this one.
    It apparently installs a runtime for .NET 9, but it could be doing
    it in a private manner. This is just the first thing that came to mind regarding dotnet executables. It may not be the absolute best example.
    The page has the usual trashy teaser-dialogs you're not supposed to press :-) And a google-vignette for you to press the reload icon on your browser
    and continue on with the download step after that.

    https://www.getpaint.net/download.html

    I'd do all of this, but I don't have Intel graphics (and Intel drivers) to test the DSA theory.
    Lots of people have laptops with an Intel iGPU, which may make them
    good candidates for a throwaway install on a scratch drive. I don't
    have a good Intel-flavored machine for this sort of test of Intel stuffings
    as a possible source of .NET 8.0 involvement.

    Paul

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2