In article <10ud36c$1tcfo$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 17/05/2026 19:08, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same system >>>> as Gallifry
Are you sure? Where is that said?
It's said when the Doctor and Leela head back to the TARDIS to carry out
some investigations because the Fendahl was the stuff of Time Lord
nightmares. It was the 5th planet in the Gallifrey's system which blew
up 12 million years ago and sent the skull flying off to Earth where it
was discovered in Africa. Then the Doctor discovered that the Time Lords
put the planet in a time loop and kept it all hushed up, so he slammed
the data cards on the TARDIS console in disgust. Therefore this
precludes it forming any kind of asteroid belt anywhere since the Time
Lords did not want any fragments of the planet to escape and carry the
Fendahl away with them. But they obviously missed one.
Assuming it was going at 17.0 km/s the same speed as Voyager 1 it would
have travelled 680 light years to get to Earth, meaning Gallifrey is 680
light years away which sounds reasonable.
I know you were paying close attention, but all the rest of us took it
the other way, and online sources also agree that it was Sol's fifth
planet.
The asteroid belt in the Solar System is 4.6 billion years old. The
Fendahl's skull was only 12 million years old. That's an astronomical
difference. You should not rely on sources generated by AI or AI
chatbots like Yads. There's no mention of any asteroid belt in either to
televised episodes or the Target novelisation which I own.
That how can the Fendahl wpid out life on Mars?
On 16/05/2026 05:02, The Doctor wrote:
This is a classic!
Sorry but the information from ChatGPT and Google Gamini are not as
accurate as view it.
What you have written is not a review. It's a series of notes.
Where is your analysis?
Wanda as Miss Ransome. Yes she is talented and should have been the
Doctor's companion with Jamie instead of Victoria Waterfield.
The Scientists - A great misguised lot trying to see on the
evolution of mankind.
They open up a fissure in space - Time and the Doctor to the Rescue
with Leela.
Note that the Fissure did get the attention of the Doctor.
also, IotF was set in 1984 Fetchborough.
Horro Claasic indeed.
The Doctor being scared off by a legend of the Fendahl.
The 5th Planet that become the asteroid belt. Hmm! Interesting
concept.
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same
system as Gallifry and the Time Lords placed it in a time loop so
even if it formed an asteroid belt 12 million years ago it's isn't
the one in our Solar System which is 4.6 billion years old and it
wouldn't be possible to observe it in Gallyfrey's solar system
because the 5th planet is still inside a time loop. One more reason
why Chibnall's degenerate woke shit is not canon since the universe
has still not been taken over by the Fendahl.
On 17/05/2026 19:08, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same system
as Gallifry
Are you sure? Where is that said?
It's said when the Doctor and Leela head back to the TARDIS to carry out some investigations because the Fendahl was the stuff of Time Lord nightmares. It was the 5th planet in the Gallifrey's system which blew
up 12 million years ago and sent the skull flying off to Earth where it
was discovered in Africa. Then the Doctor discovered that the Time Lords
put the planet in a time loop and kept it all hushed up, so he slammed
the data cards on the TARDIS console in disgust. Therefore this
precludes it forming any kind of asteroid belt anywhere since the Time
Lords did not want any fragments of the planet to escape and carry the Fendahl away with them. But they obviously missed one.
Assuming it was going at 17.0 km/s the same speed as Voyager 1 it would
have travelled 680 light years to get to Earth, meaning Gallifrey is 680 light years away which sounds reasonable.
On 18/05/2026 4:59 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 17/05/2026 19:08, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same system >>>> as Gallifry
Are you sure? Where is that said?
It's said when the Doctor and Leela head back to the TARDIS to carry
out some investigations because the Fendahl was the stuff of Time Lord
nightmares. It was the 5th planet in the Gallifrey's system which blew
up 12 million years ago and sent the skull flying off to Earth where
it was discovered in Africa. Then the Doctor discovered that the Time
Lords put the planet in a time loop and kept it all hushed up, so he
slammed the data cards on the TARDIS console in disgust. Therefore
this precludes it forming any kind of asteroid belt anywhere since the
Time Lords did not want any fragments of the planet to escape and
carry the Fendahl away with them. But they obviously missed one.
Assuming it was going at 17.0 km/s the same speed as Voyager 1 it
would have travelled 680 light years to get to Earth, meaning
Gallifrey is 680 light years away which sounds reasonable.
No it doesn't!!
Sorry!! WHAT?? If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle was travelling at 17.0 km/s, it would take a HELL of a lot longer than 680
years to reach Earth (like about 17,500 times that length of time!!)
If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle was travelling at
the speed of light (approx 300,000 Km/sec), it would take approx ONE
year to get here.
On 18/05/2026 8:21 pm, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 4:59 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 17/05/2026 19:08, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same
system
as Gallifry
Are you sure? Where is that said?
It's said when the Doctor and Leela head back to the TARDIS to carry
out some investigations because the Fendahl was the stuff of Time
Lord nightmares. It was the 5th planet in the Gallifrey's system
which blew up 12 million years ago and sent the skull flying off to
Earth where it was discovered in Africa. Then the Doctor discovered
that the Time Lords put the planet in a time loop and kept it all
hushed up, so he slammed the data cards on the TARDIS console in
disgust. Therefore this precludes it forming any kind of asteroid
belt anywhere since the Time Lords did not want any fragments of the
planet to escape and carry the Fendahl away with them. But they
obviously missed one.
Assuming it was going at 17.0 km/s the same speed as Voyager 1 it
would have travelled 680 light years to get to Earth, meaning
Gallifrey is 680 light years away which sounds reasonable.
No it doesn't!!
Sorry!! WHAT?? If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle
was travelling at 17.0 km/s, it would take a HELL of a lot longer than
680 years to reach Earth (like about 17,500 times that length of time!!)
If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle was travelling at
the speed of light (approx 300,000 Km/sec), it would take approx ONE
year to get here.
Error!! Error!! If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle was travelling at the speed of light (approx 300,000 Km/sec), it would take approx 680 year to get here.
On 17/05/2026 20:56, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ud36c$1tcfo$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 17/05/2026 19:08, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same system >>>>> as Gallifry
Are you sure? Where is that said?
It's said when the Doctor and Leela head back to the TARDIS to carry out >>> some investigations because the Fendahl was the stuff of Time Lord
nightmares. It was the 5th planet in the Gallifrey's system which blew
up 12 million years ago and sent the skull flying off to Earth where it
was discovered in Africa. Then the Doctor discovered that the Time Lords >>> put the planet in a time loop and kept it all hushed up, so he slammed
the data cards on the TARDIS console in disgust. Therefore this
precludes it forming any kind of asteroid belt anywhere since the Time
Lords did not want any fragments of the planet to escape and carry the
Fendahl away with them. But they obviously missed one.
Assuming it was going at 17.0 km/s the same speed as Voyager 1 it would
have travelled 680 light years to get to Earth, meaning Gallifrey is 680 >>> light years away which sounds reasonable.
I know you were paying close attention, but all the rest of us took it >>>> the other way, and online sources also agree that it was Sol's fifth
planet.
The asteroid belt in the Solar System is 4.6 billion years old. The
Fendahl's skull was only 12 million years old. That's an astronomical
difference. You should not rely on sources generated by AI or AI
chatbots like Yads. There's no mention of any asteroid belt in either to >>> televised episodes or the Target novelisation which I own.
That how can the Fendahl wpid out life on Mars?
It didn't. The Ice Warriors are still there.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 18/05/2026 3:34 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 16/05/2026 05:02, The Doctor wrote:
This is a classic!
Sorry but the information from ChatGPT and Google Gamini are not as
accurate as view it.
What you have written is not a review. It's a series of notes.
AS USUAL for the asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate
their joy of child sexual molestation coverup)!
Where is your analysis?
Wanda as Miss Ransome. Yes she is talented and should have been the
Doctor's companion with Jamie instead of Victoria Waterfield.
The Scientists - A great misguised lot trying to see on the
evolution of mankind.
They open up a fissure in space - Time and the Doctor to the Rescue
with Leela.
Note that the Fissure did get the attention of the Doctor.
also, IotF was set in 1984 Fetchborough.
Horro Claasic indeed.
The Doctor being scared off by a legend of the Fendahl.
The 5th Planet that become the asteroid belt. Hmm! Interesting
concept.
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same
system as Gallifry and the Time Lords placed it in a time loop so
even if it formed an asteroid belt 12 million years ago it's isn't
the one in our Solar System which is 4.6 billion years old and it
wouldn't be possible to observe it in Gallyfrey's solar system
A Very minor nit-pick .... We live in THE Solar System because the
Ancient Greeks (or whomever) named Our Star 'Sol'. Gallyfreyian's might
have named they star 'SOL', but I doubt it so they don't live in a Solar >System . Stellar System, sure, but not the Solar System.
because the 5th planet is still inside a time loop. One more reason
why Chibnall's degenerate woke shit is not canon since the universe
has still not been taken over by the Fendahl.
Maybe this might have happened in Disney's now missing THIRD Season.
----
Daniel70
On 18/05/2026 4:59 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 17/05/2026 19:08, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same system >>>> as Gallifry
Are you sure? Where is that said?
It's said when the Doctor and Leela head back to the TARDIS to carry out
some investigations because the Fendahl was the stuff of Time Lord
nightmares. It was the 5th planet in the Gallifrey's system which blew
up 12 million years ago and sent the skull flying off to Earth where it
was discovered in Africa. Then the Doctor discovered that the Time Lords
put the planet in a time loop and kept it all hushed up, so he slammed
the data cards on the TARDIS console in disgust. Therefore this
precludes it forming any kind of asteroid belt anywhere since the Time
Lords did not want any fragments of the planet to escape and carry the
Fendahl away with them. But they obviously missed one.
Assuming it was going at 17.0 km/s the same speed as Voyager 1 it would
have travelled 680 light years to get to Earth, meaning Gallifrey is 680
light years away which sounds reasonable.
No it doesn't!!
Sorry!! WHAT?? If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle was >travelling at 17.0 km/s, it would take a HELL of a lot longer than 680
years to reach Earth (like about 17,500 times that length of time!!)
If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle was travelling at
the speed of light (approx 300,000 Km/sec), it would take approx ONE
year to get here.
----
Daniel70
On 18/05/2026 8:21 pm, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 4:59 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 17/05/2026 19:08, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same system >>>>> as Gallifry
Are you sure? Where is that said?
It's said when the Doctor and Leela head back to the TARDIS to carry
out some investigations because the Fendahl was the stuff of Time Lord
nightmares. It was the 5th planet in the Gallifrey's system which blew
up 12 million years ago and sent the skull flying off to Earth where
it was discovered in Africa. Then the Doctor discovered that the Time
Lords put the planet in a time loop and kept it all hushed up, so he
slammed the data cards on the TARDIS console in disgust. Therefore
this precludes it forming any kind of asteroid belt anywhere since the
Time Lords did not want any fragments of the planet to escape and
carry the Fendahl away with them. But they obviously missed one.
Assuming it was going at 17.0 km/s the same speed as Voyager 1 it
would have travelled 680 light years to get to Earth, meaning
Gallifrey is 680 light years away which sounds reasonable.
No it doesn't!!
Sorry!! WHAT?? If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle was
travelling at 17.0 km/s, it would take a HELL of a lot longer than 680
years to reach Earth (like about 17,500 times that length of time!!)
If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle was travelling at
the speed of light (approx 300,000 Km/sec), it would take approx ONE
year to get here.
Error!! Error!! If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle was >travelling at the speed of light (approx 300,000 Km/sec), it would take >approx 680 year to get here.
----
Daniel70
On 18/05/2026 11:56, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 8:21 pm, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 4:59 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 17/05/2026 19:08, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same
system
as Gallifry
Are you sure? Where is that said?
It's said when the Doctor and Leela head back to the TARDIS to carry
out some investigations because the Fendahl was the stuff of Time
Lord nightmares. It was the 5th planet in the Gallifrey's system
which blew up 12 million years ago and sent the skull flying off to
Earth where it was discovered in Africa. Then the Doctor discovered
that the Time Lords put the planet in a time loop and kept it all
hushed up, so he slammed the data cards on the TARDIS console in
disgust. Therefore this precludes it forming any kind of asteroid
belt anywhere since the Time Lords did not want any fragments of the
planet to escape and carry the Fendahl away with them. But they
obviously missed one.
Assuming it was going at 17.0 km/s the same speed as Voyager 1 it
would have travelled 680 light years to get to Earth, meaning
Gallifrey is 680 light years away which sounds reasonable.
No it doesn't!!
Sorry!! WHAT?? If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle
was travelling at 17.0 km/s, it would take a HELL of a lot longer than
680 years to reach Earth (like about 17,500 times that length of time!!) >>>
Where the hell did I say it would take it 680 years?
I said it took it 12 million years to reach Earth. Or rather the Doctor
said it took it that long.
If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle was travelling at
the speed of light (approx 300,000 Km/sec), it would take approx ONE
year to get here.
Error!! Error!! If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle was
travelling at the speed of light (approx 300,000 Km/sec), it would take
approx 680 year to get here.
Now multiply that by 300,000/17 ie. 17,647.05882352941 and what do you
get? 12,000,000 years at 1/17,647.05882352941 of the speed of light.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
In article <10uevgf$2flbd$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
[quoted text muted]
approx 680 year to get here.
Now multiply that by 300,000/17 ie. 17,647.05882352941 and what do you >get? 12,000,000 years at 1/17,647.05882352941 of the speed of light.
All right some context coming up
In article <10uevgf$2flbd$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:56, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 8:21 pm, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 4:59 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 17/05/2026 19:08, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same >>>>>>> system
as Gallifry
Are you sure? Where is that said?
It's said when the Doctor and Leela head back to the TARDIS to carry >>>>> out some investigations because the Fendahl was the stuff of Time
Lord nightmares. It was the 5th planet in the Gallifrey's system
which blew up 12 million years ago and sent the skull flying off to
Earth where it was discovered in Africa. Then the Doctor discovered
that the Time Lords put the planet in a time loop and kept it all
hushed up, so he slammed the data cards on the TARDIS console in
disgust. Therefore this precludes it forming any kind of asteroid
belt anywhere since the Time Lords did not want any fragments of the >>>>> planet to escape and carry the Fendahl away with them. But they
obviously missed one.
Assuming it was going at 17.0 km/s the same speed as Voyager 1 it
would have travelled 680 light years to get to Earth, meaning
Gallifrey is 680 light years away which sounds reasonable.
No it doesn't!!
Sorry!! WHAT?? If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle
was travelling at 17.0 km/s, it would take a HELL of a lot longer than >>>> 680 years to reach Earth (like about 17,500 times that length of time!!) >>>>
Where the hell did I say it would take it 680 years?
I said it took it 12 million years to reach Earth. Or rather the Doctor
said it took it that long.
If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle was travelling at >>>> the speed of light (approx 300,000 Km/sec), it would take approx ONE
year to get here.
Error!! Error!! If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle was >>> travelling at the speed of light (approx 300,000 Km/sec), it would take
approx 680 year to get here.
Now multiply that by 300,000/17 ie. 17,647.05882352941 and what do you
get? 12,000,000 years at 1/17,647.05882352941 of the speed of light.
All right some context coming up
DOCTOR: They look like embryo Fendahleen to me.
(The glow has gone, and Thea wakes up.)
DOCTOR: Come and sit down. You'll be all right.
COLBY: Embryo what?
DOCTOR: Embryo Fendahleen. A creature from my own mythology. Supposed to have perished when the fifth planet broke up. At least, so they said.
COLBY: A creature from mythology? Do you know what you're talking about? DOCTOR: Well, you saw it. If it survived twelve million years, it's energy reserves must be enormous.
COLBY: Twelve million? Why did you say twelve million?
DOCTOR: What? Well, about twelve million. That's when the fifth planet
broke up. There are four thousand million people here on your planet,
and if I'm right, within a year there'll be just one left alive. Just one.
...
[Tardis]
(In flight.)
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles
out and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
LEELA: Do you think this thing, the Fendahl, comes from the fifth planet? DOCTOR: Well, it came from it a long time ago,
before your species evolved on Earth.
LEELA: How did it travel?
DOCTOR: What?
LEELA: Well, you said there's only one. It could not build
a spacecraft. How did it get to Earth?
DOCTOR: Well, it. Well, it probably used that enormous stockpile
of energy to project itself across space.
LEELA: Oh, you mean the way lightning travels.
DOCTOR: No. Yes, well, something like that. Humans speak
of astral projection, travelling psychically to different planets.
That could be a race memory.
LEELA: Race memory?
DOCTOR: Yes. You see, sometimes people dream they've been
to other places. It's, er, deja vu. No?
(On Earth, Tyler watches a white van come up the gravel drive to
the main house. Ted Moss and three other men get out.
Leela is sleeping on the console room floor. She wakes and has
her knife ready when the Doctor enters.)
DOCTOR: No, no, no. Put it away, put it away. It's a good thing
your tribe never developed guns. They'd have woken with a start
one morning and wiped themselves out.
LEELA: There was something chasing me. I, I couldn't move.
Just a dream, I suppose.
(The Doctor breaks the three plastic cards he was carrying.)
LEELA: Hey, what's wrong?
DOCTOR: I've been checking the old data banks.
There's no record at all of a fifth planet.
LEELA: Does that matter?
DOCTOR: Well of course it matters! We Time Lords are a very
meticulous people. You have to be when you live as long as we do.
All information is recorded.
LEELA: Perhaps there wasn't any.
DOCTOR: What?
LEELA: Information.
DOCTOR: What?
(He switches on the scanner. The view is green and swirling.)
DOCTOR: Of course. That's why there's no record of the planet.
LEELA: Why?
DOCTOR: That impression's produced by a time loop.
(Lights are flashing red and yellow on the console.)
LEELA: Time loop?
DOCTOR: Yes, a time loop. All memory of a planet's been erased by a circle of time, making data and its records invisible. Only a Time Lord could do that. LEELA: That's very clever.
DOCTOR: That's criminal! We've been on a wild goose chase. We'd better get back. Let's hope we're not too far round that time loop.
LEELA: Is there anything I can do?
DOCTOR: Yes. No, no. I'll just set the coordinates and we're on our way.
So what 5th Planet in a Gallifreyan system are you talking about
Use above script for your defense.
Verily, in article <10uf41c$1gbg$9@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10uevgf$2flbd$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
[quoted text muted]
approx 680 year to get here.
Now multiply that by 300,000/17 ie. 17,647.05882352941 and what do you
get? 12,000,000 years at 1/17,647.05882352941 of the speed of light.
All right some context coming up
Thanks for that. The script's handy to this.
Sooo... they just say "the fifth planet." IMO it's intuitive to assume
the fifth Solar planet, the former asteroid belt, but it doesn't
actually say.
Verily, in article <10uf41c$1gbg$9@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did >doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10uevgf$2flbd$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
[quoted text muted]
approx 680 year to get here.
Now multiply that by 300,000/17 ie. 17,647.05882352941 and what do you
get? 12,000,000 years at 1/17,647.05882352941 of the speed of light.
All right some context coming up
Thanks for that. The script's handy to this.
Sooo... they just say "the fifth planet." IMO it's intuitive to assume
the fifth Solar planet, the former asteroid belt, but it doesn't
actually say.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
On 18/05/2026 14:26, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10uevgf$2flbd$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:56, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 8:21 pm, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 4:59 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 17/05/2026 19:08, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same >>>>>>>> system
as Gallifry
Are you sure? Where is that said?
It's said when the Doctor and Leela head back to the TARDIS to carry >>>>>> out some investigations because the Fendahl was the stuff of Time
Lord nightmares. It was the 5th planet in the Gallifrey's system
which blew up 12 million years ago and sent the skull flying off to >>>>>> Earth where it was discovered in Africa. Then the Doctor discovered >>>>>> that the Time Lords put the planet in a time loop and kept it all
hushed up, so he slammed the data cards on the TARDIS console in
disgust. Therefore this precludes it forming any kind of asteroid
belt anywhere since the Time Lords did not want any fragments of the >>>>>> planet to escape and carry the Fendahl away with them. But they
obviously missed one.
Assuming it was going at 17.0 km/s the same speed as Voyager 1 it
would have travelled 680 light years to get to Earth, meaning
Gallifrey is 680 light years away which sounds reasonable.
No it doesn't!!
Sorry!! WHAT?? If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle
was travelling at 17.0 km/s, it would take a HELL of a lot longer than >>>>> 680 years to reach Earth (like about 17,500 times that length of time!!) >>>>>
Where the hell did I say it would take it 680 years?
I said it took it 12 million years to reach Earth. Or rather the Doctor
said it took it that long.
If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle was travelling at >>>>> the speed of light (approx 300,000 Km/sec), it would take approx ONE >>>>> year to get here.
Error!! Error!! If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle was >>>> travelling at the speed of light (approx 300,000 Km/sec), it would take >>>> approx 680 year to get here.
Now multiply that by 300,000/17 ie. 17,647.05882352941 and what do you
get? 12,000,000 years at 1/17,647.05882352941 of the speed of light.
All right some context coming up
DOCTOR: They look like embryo Fendahleen to me.
(The glow has gone, and Thea wakes up.)
DOCTOR: Come and sit down. You'll be all right.
COLBY: Embryo what?
DOCTOR: Embryo Fendahleen. A creature from my own mythology. Supposed to have
perished when the fifth planet broke up. At least, so they said.
Gallyfreyan mythology, therefore the 5th planet in the system of
Gallifrey. Basic comprehension really.
COLBY: A creature from mythology? Do you know what you're talking about?
DOCTOR: Well, you saw it. If it survived twelve million years, it's energy >> reserves must be enormous.
COLBY: Twelve million? Why did you say twelve million?
DOCTOR: What? Well, about twelve million. That's when the fifth planet
broke up. There are four thousand million people here on your planet,
and if I'm right, within a year there'll be just one left alive. Just one. >>
...
[Tardis]
(In flight.)
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles
out and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
The 5th planet is 107,000,000 miles out from the sun in the system of >Gallifrey.
Mars on the other hand is the 4th planet in the Earth's solar system and
is 142 million miles out from the sun.
Now answer this question, how can a 5th planet be closer than a 4th
planet in the same solar system?
The answer is that there are NOT in the same solar system. The planet
the Fendahl came from was the 5 planet in the solar system of GALLIFREY!
LEELA: Do you think this thing, the Fendahl, comes from the fifth planet?
DOCTOR: Well, it came from it a long time ago,
before your species evolved on Earth.
LEELA: How did it travel?
DOCTOR: What?
LEELA: Well, you said there's only one. It could not build
a spacecraft. How did it get to Earth?
DOCTOR: Well, it. Well, it probably used that enormous stockpile
of energy to project itself across space.
LEELA: Oh, you mean the way lightning travels.
DOCTOR: No. Yes, well, something like that. Humans speak
of astral projection, travelling psychically to different planets.
That could be a race memory.
LEELA: Race memory?
DOCTOR: Yes. You see, sometimes people dream they've been
to other places. It's, er, deja vu. No?
(On Earth, Tyler watches a white van come up the gravel drive to
the main house. Ted Moss and three other men get out.
Leela is sleeping on the console room floor. She wakes and has
her knife ready when the Doctor enters.)
DOCTOR: No, no, no. Put it away, put it away. It's a good thing
your tribe never developed guns. They'd have woken with a start
one morning and wiped themselves out.
LEELA: There was something chasing me. I, I couldn't move.
Just a dream, I suppose.
(The Doctor breaks the three plastic cards he was carrying.)
LEELA: Hey, what's wrong?
DOCTOR: I've been checking the old data banks.
There's no record at all of a fifth planet.
LEELA: Does that matter?
DOCTOR: Well of course it matters! We Time Lords are a very
meticulous people. You have to be when you live as long as we do.
All information is recorded.
LEELA: Perhaps there wasn't any.
DOCTOR: What?
LEELA: Information.
DOCTOR: What?
(He switches on the scanner. The view is green and swirling.)
DOCTOR: Of course. That's why there's no record of the planet.
LEELA: Why?
DOCTOR: That impression's produced by a time loop.
(Lights are flashing red and yellow on the console.)
LEELA: Time loop?
DOCTOR: Yes, a time loop. All memory of a planet's been erased by a circle of
time, making data and its records invisible. Only a Time Lord could do that. >> LEELA: That's very clever.
DOCTOR: That's criminal! We've been on a wild goose chase. We'd better get >> back. Let's hope we're not too far round that time loop.
LEELA: Is there anything I can do?
DOCTOR: Yes. No, no. I'll just set the coordinates and we're on our way.
So what 5th Planet in a Gallifreyan system are you talking about
The 5th planer the blew up 12 million years ago. The one the Doctor was >referring it.
Use above script for your defense.Does anyone around here have any basic skill in both English
comprehension and mathematics?
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 18/05/2026 14:55, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10uf41c$1gbg$9@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10uevgf$2flbd$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
[quoted text muted]
approx 680 year to get here.
Now multiply that by 300,000/17 ie. 17,647.05882352941 and what do you >>>> get? 12,000,000 years at 1/17,647.05882352941 of the speed of light.
All right some context coming up
Thanks for that. The script's handy to this.
Sooo... they just say "the fifth planet." IMO it's intuitive to assume
the fifth Solar planet, the former asteroid belt, but it doesn't
actually say.
NO IT IS NOT! The Doctor refers to his own Gallifreyan mythology in the
very same sentence therefore the ONLY possible logical interpretation of >what he said is that he's referring to his own 5th plant.
"DOCTOR: Embryo Fendahleen. A creature from my own mythology. Supposed
to have perished when the fifth planet broke up. At least, so they said."
He doesn't even mention a solar system until later when he's inside the >TARDIS and once again he's referring to his own solar system, especially >given the the distance he states for the orbit of the 5th planet which
is around 1/3 closer to it's sun that than Mars is to ours. Do the research.
Did anyone here apart from me pass their O-Level English Language and >O-Level Mathematics (or equivalent) exams with decent grades?
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
In article <10ufb42$2jfrg$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 14:55, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10uf41c$1gbg$9@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10uevgf$2flbd$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
[quoted text muted]
approx 680 year to get here.
Now multiply that by 300,000/17 ie. 17,647.05882352941 and what do you >>>>> get? 12,000,000 years at 1/17,647.05882352941 of the speed of light. >>>>>
All right some context coming up
Thanks for that. The script's handy to this.
Sooo... they just say "the fifth planet." IMO it's intuitive to assume
the fifth Solar planet, the former asteroid belt, but it doesn't
actually say.
NO IT IS NOT! The Doctor refers to his own Gallifreyan mythology in the
very same sentence therefore the ONLY possible logical interpretation of
what he said is that he's referring to his own 5th plant.
5th Planet of which system?
"DOCTOR: Embryo Fendahleen. A creature from my own mythology. Supposed
to have perished when the fifth planet broke up. At least, so they said."
He doesn't even mention a solar system until later when he's inside the
TARDIS and once again he's referring to his own solar system, especially
given the the distance he states for the orbit of the 5th planet which
is around 1/3 closer to it's sun that than Mars is to ours. Do the research. >>
Did anyone here apart from me pass their O-Level English Language and
O-Level Mathematics (or equivalent) exams with decent grades?
Advanced math here.
In article <10ufadb$2j821$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 14:26, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10uevgf$2flbd$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:56, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 8:21 pm, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 4:59 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 17/05/2026 19:08, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same >>>>>>>>> system
as Gallifry
Are you sure? Where is that said?
It's said when the Doctor and Leela head back to the TARDIS to carry >>>>>>> out some investigations because the Fendahl was the stuff of Time >>>>>>> Lord nightmares. It was the 5th planet in the Gallifrey's system >>>>>>> which blew up 12 million years ago and sent the skull flying off to >>>>>>> Earth where it was discovered in Africa. Then the Doctor discovered >>>>>>> that the Time Lords put the planet in a time loop and kept it all >>>>>>> hushed up, so he slammed the data cards on the TARDIS console in >>>>>>> disgust. Therefore this precludes it forming any kind of asteroid >>>>>>> belt anywhere since the Time Lords did not want any fragments of the >>>>>>> planet to escape and carry the Fendahl away with them. But they
obviously missed one.
Assuming it was going at 17.0 km/s the same speed as Voyager 1 it >>>>>>> would have travelled 680 light years to get to Earth, meaning
Gallifrey is 680 light years away which sounds reasonable.
No it doesn't!!
Sorry!! WHAT?? If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle >>>>>> was travelling at 17.0 km/s, it would take a HELL of a lot longer than >>>>>> 680 years to reach Earth (like about 17,500 times that length of time!!) >>>>>>
Where the hell did I say it would take it 680 years?
I said it took it 12 million years to reach Earth. Or rather the Doctor >>>> said it took it that long.
If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle was travelling at >>>>>> the speed of light (approx 300,000 Km/sec), it would take approx ONE >>>>>> year to get here.
Error!! Error!! If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle was >>>>> travelling at the speed of light (approx 300,000 Km/sec), it would take >>>>> approx 680 year to get here.
Now multiply that by 300,000/17 ie. 17,647.05882352941 and what do you >>>> get? 12,000,000 years at 1/17,647.05882352941 of the speed of light.
All right some context coming up
DOCTOR: They look like embryo Fendahleen to me.
(The glow has gone, and Thea wakes up.)
DOCTOR: Come and sit down. You'll be all right.
COLBY: Embryo what?
DOCTOR: Embryo Fendahleen. A creature from my own mythology. Supposed to have
perished when the fifth planet broke up. At least, so they said.
Gallyfreyan mythology, therefore the 5th planet in the system of
Gallifrey. Basic comprehension really.
Where do you imply that?
COLBY: A creature from mythology? Do you know what you're talking about? >>> DOCTOR: Well, you saw it. If it survived twelve million years, it's energy >>> reserves must be enormous.
COLBY: Twelve million? Why did you say twelve million?
DOCTOR: What? Well, about twelve million. That's when the fifth planet
broke up. There are four thousand million people here on your planet,
and if I'm right, within a year there'll be just one left alive. Just one. >>>
...
[Tardis]
(In flight.)
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles
out and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
The 5th planet is 107,000,000 miles out from the sun in the system of
Gallifrey.
Mars on the other hand is the 4th planet in the Earth's solar system and
is 142 million miles out from the sun.
Now answer this question, how can a 5th planet be closer than a 4th
planet in the same solar system?
The answer is that there are NOT in the same solar system. The planet
the Fendahl came from was the 5 planet in the solar system of GALLIFREY!
LEELA: Do you think this thing, the Fendahl, comes from the fifth planet? >>> DOCTOR: Well, it came from it a long time ago,
before your species evolved on Earth.
LEELA: How did it travel?
DOCTOR: What?
LEELA: Well, you said there's only one. It could not build
a spacecraft. How did it get to Earth?
DOCTOR: Well, it. Well, it probably used that enormous stockpile
of energy to project itself across space.
LEELA: Oh, you mean the way lightning travels.
DOCTOR: No. Yes, well, something like that. Humans speak
of astral projection, travelling psychically to different planets.
That could be a race memory.
LEELA: Race memory?
DOCTOR: Yes. You see, sometimes people dream they've been
to other places. It's, er, deja vu. No?
(On Earth, Tyler watches a white van come up the gravel drive to
the main house. Ted Moss and three other men get out.
Leela is sleeping on the console room floor. She wakes and has
her knife ready when the Doctor enters.)
DOCTOR: No, no, no. Put it away, put it away. It's a good thing
your tribe never developed guns. They'd have woken with a start
one morning and wiped themselves out.
LEELA: There was something chasing me. I, I couldn't move.
Just a dream, I suppose.
(The Doctor breaks the three plastic cards he was carrying.)
LEELA: Hey, what's wrong?
DOCTOR: I've been checking the old data banks.
There's no record at all of a fifth planet.
LEELA: Does that matter?
DOCTOR: Well of course it matters! We Time Lords are a very
meticulous people. You have to be when you live as long as we do.
All information is recorded.
LEELA: Perhaps there wasn't any.
DOCTOR: What?
LEELA: Information.
DOCTOR: What?
(He switches on the scanner. The view is green and swirling.)
DOCTOR: Of course. That's why there's no record of the planet.
LEELA: Why?
DOCTOR: That impression's produced by a time loop.
(Lights are flashing red and yellow on the console.)
LEELA: Time loop?
DOCTOR: Yes, a time loop. All memory of a planet's been erased by a circle of
time, making data and its records invisible. Only a Time Lord could do that.
LEELA: That's very clever.
DOCTOR: That's criminal! We've been on a wild goose chase. We'd better get >>> back. Let's hope we're not too far round that time loop.
LEELA: Is there anything I can do?
DOCTOR: Yes. No, no. I'll just set the coordinates and we're on our way. >>>
So what 5th Planet in a Gallifreyan system are you talking about
The 5th planer the blew up 12 million years ago. The one the Doctor was
referring it.
Use above script for your defense.Does anyone around here have any basic skill in both English
comprehension and mathematics?
Add astonomy.
In article <10ueie3$2bnu8$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 17/05/2026 20:56, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ud36c$1tcfo$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 17/05/2026 19:08, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same system >>>>>> as Gallifry
Are you sure? Where is that said?
It's said when the Doctor and Leela head back to the TARDIS to carry out >>>> some investigations because the Fendahl was the stuff of Time Lord
nightmares. It was the 5th planet in the Gallifrey's system which blew >>>> up 12 million years ago and sent the skull flying off to Earth where it >>>> was discovered in Africa. Then the Doctor discovered that the Time Lords >>>> put the planet in a time loop and kept it all hushed up, so he slammed >>>> the data cards on the TARDIS console in disgust. Therefore this
precludes it forming any kind of asteroid belt anywhere since the Time >>>> Lords did not want any fragments of the planet to escape and carry the >>>> Fendahl away with them. But they obviously missed one.
Assuming it was going at 17.0 km/s the same speed as Voyager 1 it would >>>> have travelled 680 light years to get to Earth, meaning Gallifrey is 680 >>>> light years away which sounds reasonable.
I know you were paying close attention, but all the rest of us took it >>>>> the other way, and online sources also agree that it was Sol's fifth >>>>> planet.
The asteroid belt in the Solar System is 4.6 billion years old. The
Fendahl's skull was only 12 million years old. That's an astronomical
difference. You should not rely on sources generated by AI or AI
chatbots like Yads. There's no mention of any asteroid belt in either to >>>> televised episodes or the Target novelisation which I own.
That how can the Fendahl wpid out life on Mars?
It didn't. The Ice Warriors are still there.
After the Fendahl wiped out the native life.
On 18/05/2026 14:26, The Doctor wrote:
[quoted text muted]
(The glow has gone, and Thea wakes up.)
DOCTOR: Come and sit down. You'll be all right.
COLBY: Embryo what?
DOCTOR: Embryo Fendahleen. A creature from my own mythology. Supposed to have
perished when the fifth planet broke up. At least, so they said.
Gallyfreyan mythology, therefore the 5th planet in the system of
Gallifrey. Basic comprehension really.
[quoted text muted]
[Tardis]
(In flight.)
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles
out and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
The 5th planet is 107,000,000 miles out from the sun in the system of Gallifrey.
Mars on the other hand is the 4th planet in the Earth's solar system and
is 142 million miles out from the sun.
Now answer this question, how can a 5th planet be closer than a 4th
planet in the same solar system?
The answer is that there are NOT in the same solar system. The planet
the Fendahl came from was the 5 planet in the solar system of GALLIFREY!
Does anyone around here have any basic skill in both English
comprehension and mathematics?
Do you seriously think the asteroid belt is only 12
million years old?
Did they not teach you how old it actually is and how
it formed?
Do you want to explain that to me? Explain how the solar
system came into being. I expect at least 100 words in
paragraph form.
On 18/05/2026 3:34 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 16/05/2026 05:02, The Doctor wrote:
This is a classic!
Sorry but the information from ChatGPT and Google Gamini are not as
accurate as view it.
What you have written is not a review. It's a series of notes.
AS USUAL for the asswipe!
Where is your analysis?
Wanda as Miss Ransome. Yes she is talented and should have been the
Doctor's companion with Jamie instead of Victoria Waterfield.
The Scientists - A great misguised lot trying to see on the
evolution of mankind.
They open up a fissure in space - Time and the Doctor to the Rescue
with Leela.
Note that the Fissure did get the attention of the Doctor.
also, IotF was set in 1984 Fetchborough.
Horro Claasic indeed.
The Doctor being scared off by a legend of the Fendahl.
The 5th Planet that become the asteroid belt. Hmm! Interesting
concept.
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same
system as Gallifry and the Time Lords placed it in a time loop so
even if it formed an asteroid belt 12 million years ago it's isn't
the one in our Solar System which is 4.6 billion years old and it
wouldn't be possible to observe it in Gallyfrey's solar system
A Very minor nit-pick .... We live in THE Solar System because the
Ancient Greeks (or whomever) named Our Star 'Sol'. Gallyfreyian's might
have named they star 'SOL', but I doubt it so they don't live in a Solar System . Stellar System, sure, but not the Solar System.
--because the 5th planet is still inside a time loop. One more reason
why Chibnall's degenerate woke shit is not canon since the universe
has still not been taken over by the Fendahl.
Maybe this might have happened in Disney's now missing THIRD Season.
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sun in Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any sun,
ie. a star orbited by planets.
On 18/05/2026 17:52, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ufb42$2jfrg$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 14:55, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10uf41c$1gbg$9@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10uevgf$2flbd$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
[quoted text muted]
approx 680 year to get here.
Now multiply that by 300,000/17 ie. 17,647.05882352941 and what do you >>>>>> get? 12,000,000 years at 1/17,647.05882352941 of the speed of light. >>>>>>
All right some context coming up
Thanks for that. The script's handy to this.
Sooo... they just say "the fifth planet." IMO it's intuitive to assume >>>> the fifth Solar planet, the former asteroid belt, but it doesn't
actually say.
NO IT IS NOT! The Doctor refers to his own Gallifreyan mythology in the
very same sentence therefore the ONLY possible logical interpretation of >>> what he said is that he's referring to his own 5th plant.
5th Planet of which system?
"DOCTOR: Embryo Fendahleen. A creature from my own mythology. Supposed
to have perished when the fifth planet broke up. At least, so they said." >>>
He doesn't even mention a solar system until later when he's inside the
TARDIS and once again he's referring to his own solar system, especially >>> given the the distance he states for the orbit of the 5th planet which
is around 1/3 closer to it's sun that than Mars is to ours. Do the research.
Did anyone here apart from me pass their O-Level English Language and
O-Level Mathematics (or equivalent) exams with decent grades?
Advanced math here.
Degree level here along with physics including astronomy.
Now, what about your English Language?
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 18/05/2026 17:50, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ufadb$2j821$1@dont-email.me>,Supposed to have
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 14:26, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10uevgf$2flbd$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:56, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 8:21 pm, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 4:59 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 17/05/2026 19:08, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same >>>>>>>>>> system
as Gallifry
Are you sure? Where is that said?
It's said when the Doctor and Leela head back to the TARDIS to carry >>>>>>>> out some investigations because the Fendahl was the stuff of Time >>>>>>>> Lord nightmares. It was the 5th planet in the Gallifrey's system >>>>>>>> which blew up 12 million years ago and sent the skull flying off to >>>>>>>> Earth where it was discovered in Africa. Then the Doctor discovered >>>>>>>> that the Time Lords put the planet in a time loop and kept it all >>>>>>>> hushed up, so he slammed the data cards on the TARDIS console in >>>>>>>> disgust. Therefore this precludes it forming any kind of asteroid >>>>>>>> belt anywhere since the Time Lords did not want any fragments of the >>>>>>>> planet to escape and carry the Fendahl away with them. But they >>>>>>>> obviously missed one.
Assuming it was going at 17.0 km/s the same speed as Voyager 1 it >>>>>>>> would have travelled 680 light years to get to Earth, meaning
Gallifrey is 680 light years away which sounds reasonable.
No it doesn't!!
Sorry!! WHAT?? If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle >>>>>>> was travelling at 17.0 km/s, it would take a HELL of a lot longer than >>>>>>> 680 years to reach Earth (like about 17,500 times that length of time!!)
Where the hell did I say it would take it 680 years?
I said it took it 12 million years to reach Earth. Or rather the Doctor >>>>> said it took it that long.
If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle was travelling at >>>>>>> the speed of light (approx 300,000 Km/sec), it would take approx ONE >>>>>>> year to get here.
Error!! Error!! If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle was >>>>>> travelling at the speed of light (approx 300,000 Km/sec), it would take >>>>>> approx 680 year to get here.
Now multiply that by 300,000/17 ie. 17,647.05882352941 and what do you >>>>> get? 12,000,000 years at 1/17,647.05882352941 of the speed of light. >>>>>
All right some context coming up
DOCTOR: They look like embryo Fendahleen to me.
(The glow has gone, and Thea wakes up.)
DOCTOR: Come and sit down. You'll be all right.
COLBY: Embryo what?
DOCTOR: Embryo Fendahleen. A creature from my own mythology.
perished when the fifth planet broke up. At least, so they said.
Gallyfreyan mythology, therefore the 5th planet in the system of
Gallifrey. Basic comprehension really.
Where do you imply that?
It's explicit from what the Doctor said. There is no other possible >interpretation. He's a Time Lord from the planet Gallifrey referring to
his own Gallifreyan mythology, therefore his own fifth planet.
Did you pass English Language?
COLBY: A creature from mythology? Do you know what you're talking about? >>>> DOCTOR: Well, you saw it. If it survived twelve million years, it's energy >>>> reserves must be enormous.
COLBY: Twelve million? Why did you say twelve million?
DOCTOR: What? Well, about twelve million. That's when the fifth planet >>>> broke up. There are four thousand million people here on your planet,
and if I'm right, within a year there'll be just one left alive. Just one. >>>>
...
[Tardis]
(In flight.)
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles
out and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
The 5th planet is 107,000,000 miles out from the sun in the system of
Gallifrey.
Mars on the other hand is the 4th planet in the Earth's solar system and >>> is 142 million miles out from the sun.
Now answer this question, how can a 5th planet be closer than a 4th
planet in the same solar system?
The answer is that there are NOT in the same solar system. The planet
the Fendahl came from was the 5 planet in the solar system of GALLIFREY! >>>
LEELA: Do you think this thing, the Fendahl, comes from the fifth planet? >>>> DOCTOR: Well, it came from it a long time ago,
before your species evolved on Earth.
LEELA: How did it travel?
DOCTOR: What?
LEELA: Well, you said there's only one. It could not build
a spacecraft. How did it get to Earth?
DOCTOR: Well, it. Well, it probably used that enormous stockpile
of energy to project itself across space.
LEELA: Oh, you mean the way lightning travels.
DOCTOR: No. Yes, well, something like that. Humans speak
of astral projection, travelling psychically to different planets.
That could be a race memory.
LEELA: Race memory?
DOCTOR: Yes. You see, sometimes people dream they've been
to other places. It's, er, deja vu. No?
(On Earth, Tyler watches a white van come up the gravel drive to
the main house. Ted Moss and three other men get out.
Leela is sleeping on the console room floor. She wakes and has
her knife ready when the Doctor enters.)
DOCTOR: No, no, no. Put it away, put it away. It's a good thing
your tribe never developed guns. They'd have woken with a start
one morning and wiped themselves out.
LEELA: There was something chasing me. I, I couldn't move.
Just a dream, I suppose.
(The Doctor breaks the three plastic cards he was carrying.)
LEELA: Hey, what's wrong?
DOCTOR: I've been checking the old data banks.
There's no record at all of a fifth planet.
LEELA: Does that matter?
DOCTOR: Well of course it matters! We Time Lords are a very
meticulous people. You have to be when you live as long as we do.
All information is recorded.
LEELA: Perhaps there wasn't any.
DOCTOR: What?
LEELA: Information.
DOCTOR: What?
(He switches on the scanner. The view is green and swirling.)
DOCTOR: Of course. That's why there's no record of the planet.
LEELA: Why?
DOCTOR: That impression's produced by a time loop.
(Lights are flashing red and yellow on the console.)
LEELA: Time loop?
DOCTOR: Yes, a time loop. All memory of a planet's been erased by a >circle of
time, making data and its records invisible. Only a Time Lord could do that.
LEELA: That's very clever.
DOCTOR: That's criminal! We've been on a wild goose chase. We'd better get >>>> back. Let's hope we're not too far round that time loop.
LEELA: Is there anything I can do?
DOCTOR: Yes. No, no. I'll just set the coordinates and we're on our way. >>>>
So what 5th Planet in a Gallifreyan system are you talking about
The 5th planer the blew up 12 million years ago. The one the Doctor was
referring it.
Use above script for your defense.Does anyone around here have any basic skill in both English
comprehension and mathematics?
Add astonomy.
You can't even spell astronomy correctly and you don't even realise it,
so why should I believe you when with your level of English you wouldn't >have been able to write a dissertation.
Do you seriously think the asteroid belt is only 12 million years old?
Did they not teach you how old it actually is and how it formed?
Do you want to explain that to me? Explain how the solar system came
into being. I expect at least 100 words in paragraph form.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 18/05/2026 14:09, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ueie3$2bnu8$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 17/05/2026 20:56, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ud36c$1tcfo$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 17/05/2026 19:08, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same system >>>>>>> as Gallifry
Are you sure? Where is that said?
It's said when the Doctor and Leela head back to the TARDIS to carry out >>>>> some investigations because the Fendahl was the stuff of Time Lord
nightmares. It was the 5th planet in the Gallifrey's system which blew >>>>> up 12 million years ago and sent the skull flying off to Earth where it >>>>> was discovered in Africa. Then the Doctor discovered that the Time Lords >>>>> put the planet in a time loop and kept it all hushed up, so he slammed >>>>> the data cards on the TARDIS console in disgust. Therefore this
precludes it forming any kind of asteroid belt anywhere since the Time >>>>> Lords did not want any fragments of the planet to escape and carry the >>>>> Fendahl away with them. But they obviously missed one.
Assuming it was going at 17.0 km/s the same speed as Voyager 1 it would >>>>> have travelled 680 light years to get to Earth, meaning Gallifrey is 680 >>>>> light years away which sounds reasonable.
I know you were paying close attention, but all the rest of us took it >>>>>> the other way, and online sources also agree that it was Sol's fifth >>>>>> planet.
The asteroid belt in the Solar System is 4.6 billion years old. The
Fendahl's skull was only 12 million years old. That's an astronomical >>>>> difference. You should not rely on sources generated by AI or AI
chatbots like Yads. There's no mention of any asteroid belt in either to >>>>> televised episodes or the Target novelisation which I own.
That how can the Fendahl wpid out life on Mars?
It didn't. The Ice Warriors are still there.
After the Fendahl wiped out the native life.
The native life were the Ice Warriors and they didn't evolve in the last
12 million years. Did they not teach you biology and evolution at
school? Oh, no, wait... You think humans have only existed for 6000
years and they were created by God rather than having evolved from
primates. Are you sure you studied astronomy? Did they not teach you
about the big bang, inflation, the Hubble Constant and the expansion of
the universe and how it might continue? Do you want to write an essay
about the above to show me what you actually know?
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Verily, in article <10ufadb$2j821$1@dont-email.me>, did >agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 18/05/2026 14:26, The Doctor wrote:Supposed to have
[quoted text muted]
(The glow has gone, and Thea wakes up.)
DOCTOR: Come and sit down. You'll be all right.
COLBY: Embryo what?
DOCTOR: Embryo Fendahleen. A creature from my own mythology.
perished when the fifth planet broke up. At least, so they said.
Gallyfreyan mythology, therefore the 5th planet in the system of
Gallifrey. Basic comprehension really.
[quoted text muted]
[Tardis]
(In flight.)
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles
out and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
The 5th planet is 107,000,000 miles out from the sun in the system of
Gallifrey.
Mars on the other hand is the 4th planet in the Earth's solar system and
is 142 million miles out from the sun.
Now answer this question, how can a 5th planet be closer than a 4th
planet in the same solar system?
The answer is that there are NOT in the same solar system. The planet
the Fendahl came from was the 5 planet in the solar system of GALLIFREY!
That's a good case. I concede the point.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
The True Doctor wrote:
Does anyone around here have any basic skill in both English
comprehension and mathematics?
Well, I do... I think! However, I have given up wasting my time
trying to discuss something sensible with somebody suffering
from a mental retardation... on day release from a psych ward.
It's like banging your head against a wall, over and over again.
The True Doctor wrote:
Do you seriously think the asteroid belt is only 12
million years old?
Did they not teach you how old it actually is and how
it formed?
He won't need an online script for this one! It's all in his
special book.
Do you want to explain that to me? Explain how the solar
system came into being. I expect at least 100 words in
paragraph form.
Well, it'll probably start something like this:
In the beginning god created the heavens and the earth...
On 18/05/2026 11:00, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 3:34 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 16/05/2026 05:02, The Doctor wrote:
This is a classic!
Sorry but the information from ChatGPT and Google Gamini are not as
accurate as view it.
What you have written is not a review. It's a series of notes.
AS USUAL for the asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their
joy of child sexual molestation cleanup)!
Where is your analysis?
Wanda as Miss Ransome. Yes she is talented and should have been the
Doctor's companion with Jamie instead of Victoria Waterfield.
The Scientists - A great misguised lot trying to see on the
evolution of mankind.
They open up a fissure in space - Time and the Doctor to the Rescue
with Leela.
Note that the Fissure did get the attention of the Doctor.
also, IotF was set in 1984 Fetchborough.
Horro Claasic indeed.
The Doctor being scared off by a legend of the Fendahl.
The 5th Planet that become the asteroid belt. Hmm! Interesting
concept.
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same
system as Gallifry and the Time Lords placed it in a time loop so
even if it formed an asteroid belt 12 million years ago it's isn't
the one in our Solar System which is 4.6 billion years old and it
wouldn't be possible to observe it in Gallyfrey's solar system
A Very minor nit-pick .... We live in THE Solar System because the
Ancient Greeks (or whomever) named Our Star 'Sol'. Gallyfreyian's might
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sun in >Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any sun,
ie. a star orbited by planets.
have named they star 'SOL', but I doubt it so they don't live in a Solar
System . Stellar System, sure, but not the Solar System.
The terms solar system and star system (stellar system) are
interchangeable and hardly anyone uses the term stellar system anyway.
because the 5th planet is still inside a time loop. One more reason
why Chibnall's degenerate woke shit is not canon since the universe
has still not been taken over by the Fendahl.
Maybe this might have happened in Disney's now missing THIRD Season.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Verily, in article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, did >agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sun in
Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any sun,
ie. a star orbited by planets.
Many use Sol for our star's name, Terra for our planet's name, and Luna
for our moon's name. Capitalization matters. A solar system isn't >necessarily the Solar system... but most people would probably say "star >system" for others.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
In article <10ufh0n$2lg7s$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 17:52, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ufb42$2jfrg$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 14:55, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10uf41c$1gbg$9@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10uevgf$2flbd$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
[quoted text muted]
approx 680 year to get here.
Now multiply that by 300,000/17 ie. 17,647.05882352941 and what do you >>>>>>> get? 12,000,000 years at 1/17,647.05882352941 of the speed of light. >>>>>>>
All right some context coming up
Thanks for that. The script's handy to this.
Sooo... they just say "the fifth planet." IMO it's intuitive to assume >>>>> the fifth Solar planet, the former asteroid belt, but it doesn't
actually say.
NO IT IS NOT! The Doctor refers to his own Gallifreyan mythology in the >>>> very same sentence therefore the ONLY possible logical interpretation of >>>> what he said is that he's referring to his own 5th plant.
5th Planet of which system?
"DOCTOR: Embryo Fendahleen. A creature from my own mythology. Supposed >>>> to have perished when the fifth planet broke up. At least, so they said." >>>>
He doesn't even mention a solar system until later when he's inside the >>>> TARDIS and once again he's referring to his own solar system, especially >>>> given the the distance he states for the orbit of the 5th planet which >>>> is around 1/3 closer to it's sun that than Mars is to ours. Do the research.
Did anyone here apart from me pass their O-Level English Language and
O-Level Mathematics (or equivalent) exams with decent grades?
Advanced math here.
Degree level here along with physics including astronomy.
Now, what about your English Language?
Before that.
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles out
and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
107 000 000 miles from Earth!
And give an AU is 93 000 000 miles,
The 5th Planet would be slightly over 2 AUs (2 and 14/93 AUs)
from the Sun.
In article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:00, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 3:34 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 16/05/2026 05:02, The Doctor wrote:
This is a classic!
Sorry but the information from ChatGPT and Google Gamini are not as
accurate as view it.
What you have written is not a review. It's a series of notes.
AS USUAL for the asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their
joy of child sexual molestation cleanup)!
Where is your analysis?
Wanda as Miss Ransome. Yes she is talented and should have been the
Doctor's companion with Jamie instead of Victoria Waterfield.
The Scientists - A great misguised lot trying to see on the
evolution of mankind.
They open up a fissure in space - Time and the Doctor to the Rescue
with Leela.
Note that the Fissure did get the attention of the Doctor.
also, IotF was set in 1984 Fetchborough.
Horro Claasic indeed.
The Doctor being scared off by a legend of the Fendahl.
The 5th Planet that become the asteroid belt. Hmm! Interesting
concept.
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same
system as Gallifry and the Time Lords placed it in a time loop so
even if it formed an asteroid belt 12 million years ago it's isn't
the one in our Solar System which is 4.6 billion years old and it
wouldn't be possible to observe it in Gallyfrey's solar system
A Very minor nit-pick .... We live in THE Solar System because the
Ancient Greeks (or whomever) named Our Star 'Sol'. Gallyfreyian's might
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sun in
Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any sun,
ie. a star orbited by planets.
have named they star 'SOL', but I doubt it so they don't live in a Solar >>> System . Stellar System, sure, but not the Solar System.
The terms solar system and star system (stellar system) are
interchangeable and hardly anyone uses the term stellar system anyway.
The Sun is a star.
--because the 5th planet is still inside a time loop. One more reason
why Chibnall's degenerate woke shit is not canon since the universe
has still not been taken over by the Fendahl.
Maybe this might have happened in Disney's now missing THIRD Season.
In article <10ufide$2lvag$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 14:09, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ueie3$2bnu8$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 17/05/2026 20:56, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ud36c$1tcfo$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 17/05/2026 19:08, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same system
as Gallifry
Are you sure? Where is that said?
It's said when the Doctor and Leela head back to the TARDIS to carry out >>>>>> some investigations because the Fendahl was the stuff of Time Lord >>>>>> nightmares. It was the 5th planet in the Gallifrey's system which blew >>>>>> up 12 million years ago and sent the skull flying off to Earth where it >>>>>> was discovered in Africa. Then the Doctor discovered that the Time Lords >>>>>> put the planet in a time loop and kept it all hushed up, so he slammed >>>>>> the data cards on the TARDIS console in disgust. Therefore this
precludes it forming any kind of asteroid belt anywhere since the Time >>>>>> Lords did not want any fragments of the planet to escape and carry the >>>>>> Fendahl away with them. But they obviously missed one.
Assuming it was going at 17.0 km/s the same speed as Voyager 1 it would >>>>>> have travelled 680 light years to get to Earth, meaning Gallifrey is 680 >>>>>> light years away which sounds reasonable.
I know you were paying close attention, but all the rest of us took it >>>>>>> the other way, and online sources also agree that it was Sol's fifth >>>>>>> planet.
The asteroid belt in the Solar System is 4.6 billion years old. The >>>>>> Fendahl's skull was only 12 million years old. That's an astronomical >>>>>> difference. You should not rely on sources generated by AI or AI
chatbots like Yads. There's no mention of any asteroid belt in either to >>>>>> televised episodes or the Target novelisation which I own.
That how can the Fendahl wpid out life on Mars?
It didn't. The Ice Warriors are still there.
After the Fendahl wiped out the native life.
The native life were the Ice Warriors and they didn't evolve in the last
12 million years. Did they not teach you biology and evolution at
school? Oh, no, wait... You think humans have only existed for 6000
years and they were created by God rather than having evolved from
primates. Are you sure you studied astronomy? Did they not teach you
about the big bang, inflation, the Hubble Constant and the expansion of
the universe and how it might continue? Do you want to write an essay
about the above to show me what you actually know?
Yes!
Still The Doctor did say the Fendalhl wiped out life on Mars
on its way to Earth.
In article <xn0ppxkw5iw5tea002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Do you seriously think the asteroid belt is only 12
million years old?
Did they not teach you how old it actually is and how
it formed?
He won't need an online script for this one! It's all in his
special book.
The explain the asteroid belt
Do you want to explain that to me? Explain how the solar
system came into being. I expect at least 100 words in
paragraph form.
Well, it'll probably start something like this:
In the beginning god created the heavens and the earth...
Yes just that you misspelled God.
In article <10ufhtl$2lqjh$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 17:50, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ufadb$2j821$1@dont-email.me>,Supposed to have
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 14:26, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10uevgf$2flbd$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:56, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 8:21 pm, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 4:59 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 17/05/2026 19:08, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same >>>>>>>>>>> system
as Gallifry
Are you sure? Where is that said?
It's said when the Doctor and Leela head back to the TARDIS to carry >>>>>>>>> out some investigations because the Fendahl was the stuff of Time >>>>>>>>> Lord nightmares. It was the 5th planet in the Gallifrey's system >>>>>>>>> which blew up 12 million years ago and sent the skull flying off to >>>>>>>>> Earth where it was discovered in Africa. Then the Doctor discovered >>>>>>>>> that the Time Lords put the planet in a time loop and kept it all >>>>>>>>> hushed up, so he slammed the data cards on the TARDIS console in >>>>>>>>> disgust. Therefore this precludes it forming any kind of asteroid >>>>>>>>> belt anywhere since the Time Lords did not want any fragments of the >>>>>>>>> planet to escape and carry the Fendahl away with them. But they >>>>>>>>> obviously missed one.
Assuming it was going at 17.0 km/s the same speed as Voyager 1 it >>>>>>>>> would have travelled 680 light years to get to Earth, meaning >>>>>>>>> Gallifrey is 680 light years away which sounds reasonable.
No it doesn't!!
Sorry!! WHAT?? If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle >>>>>>>> was travelling at 17.0 km/s, it would take a HELL of a lot longer than >>>>>>>> 680 years to reach Earth (like about 17,500 times that length of time!!)
Where the hell did I say it would take it 680 years?
I said it took it 12 million years to reach Earth. Or rather the Doctor >>>>>> said it took it that long.
If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle was travelling at >>>>>>>> the speed of light (approx 300,000 Km/sec), it would take approx ONE >>>>>>>> year to get here.
Error!! Error!! If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle was
travelling at the speed of light (approx 300,000 Km/sec), it would take >>>>>>> approx 680 year to get here.
Now multiply that by 300,000/17 ie. 17,647.05882352941 and what do you >>>>>> get? 12,000,000 years at 1/17,647.05882352941 of the speed of light. >>>>>>
All right some context coming up
DOCTOR: They look like embryo Fendahleen to me.
(The glow has gone, and Thea wakes up.)
DOCTOR: Come and sit down. You'll be all right.
COLBY: Embryo what?
DOCTOR: Embryo Fendahleen. A creature from my own mythology.
perished when the fifth planet broke up. At least, so they said.
Gallyfreyan mythology, therefore the 5th planet in the system of
Gallifrey. Basic comprehension really.
Where do you imply that?
It's explicit from what the Doctor said. There is no other possible
interpretation. He's a Time Lord from the planet Gallifrey referring to
his own Gallifreyan mythology, therefore his own fifth planet.
Did you pass English Language?
Yes Gallifreyan mythology.
Galaxy not determined until
COLBY: A creature from mythology? Do you know what you're talking about? >>>>> DOCTOR: Well, you saw it. If it survived twelve million years, it's energy
reserves must be enormous.
COLBY: Twelve million? Why did you say twelve million?
DOCTOR: What? Well, about twelve million. That's when the fifth planet >>>>> broke up. There are four thousand million people here on your planet, >>>>> and if I'm right, within a year there'll be just one left alive. Just one.
...
[Tardis]
(In flight.)
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles
out and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
The 5th planet is 107,000,000 miles out from the sun in the system of
Gallifrey.
How far is Gallifrey from its star?
Mars on the other hand is the 4th planet in the Earth's solar system and >>>> is 142 million miles out from the sun.
49 000 000 miles from Earth.
What about Jupiter?
And (142/93) AIs is 1.52688172043010752688 AUs.
circle of
Now answer this question, how can a 5th planet be closer than a 4th
planet in the same solar system?
The answer is that there are NOT in the same solar system. The planet
the Fendahl came from was the 5 planet in the solar system of GALLIFREY! >>>>
LEELA: Do you think this thing, the Fendahl, comes from the fifth planet? >>>>> DOCTOR: Well, it came from it a long time ago,
before your species evolved on Earth.
LEELA: How did it travel?
DOCTOR: What?
LEELA: Well, you said there's only one. It could not build
a spacecraft. How did it get to Earth?
DOCTOR: Well, it. Well, it probably used that enormous stockpile
of energy to project itself across space.
LEELA: Oh, you mean the way lightning travels.
DOCTOR: No. Yes, well, something like that. Humans speak
of astral projection, travelling psychically to different planets.
That could be a race memory.
LEELA: Race memory?
DOCTOR: Yes. You see, sometimes people dream they've been
to other places. It's, er, deja vu. No?
(On Earth, Tyler watches a white van come up the gravel drive to
the main house. Ted Moss and three other men get out.
Leela is sleeping on the console room floor. She wakes and has
her knife ready when the Doctor enters.)
DOCTOR: No, no, no. Put it away, put it away. It's a good thing
your tribe never developed guns. They'd have woken with a start
one morning and wiped themselves out.
LEELA: There was something chasing me. I, I couldn't move.
Just a dream, I suppose.
(The Doctor breaks the three plastic cards he was carrying.)
LEELA: Hey, what's wrong?
DOCTOR: I've been checking the old data banks.
There's no record at all of a fifth planet.
LEELA: Does that matter?
DOCTOR: Well of course it matters! We Time Lords are a very
meticulous people. You have to be when you live as long as we do.
All information is recorded.
LEELA: Perhaps there wasn't any.
DOCTOR: What?
LEELA: Information.
DOCTOR: What?
(He switches on the scanner. The view is green and swirling.)
DOCTOR: Of course. That's why there's no record of the planet.
LEELA: Why?
DOCTOR: That impression's produced by a time loop.
(Lights are flashing red and yellow on the console.)
LEELA: Time loop?
DOCTOR: Yes, a time loop. All memory of a planet's been erased by a
time, making data and its records invisible. Only a Time Lord could do that.
LEELA: That's very clever.
DOCTOR: That's criminal! We've been on a wild goose chase. We'd better get
back. Let's hope we're not too far round that time loop.
LEELA: Is there anything I can do?
DOCTOR: Yes. No, no. I'll just set the coordinates and we're on our way. >>>>>
So what 5th Planet in a Gallifreyan system are you talking about
The 5th planer the blew up 12 million years ago. The one the Doctor was >>>> referring it.
Use above script for your defense.Does anyone around here have any basic skill in both English
comprehension and mathematics?
Add astonomy.
You can't even spell astronomy correctly and you don't even realise it,
so why should I believe you when with your level of English you wouldn't
have been able to write a dissertation.
Do you seriously think the asteroid belt is only 12 million years old?
Older and fragments of a planet.
Did they not teach you how old it actually is and how it formed?
Do you want to explain that to me? Explain how the solar system came
into being. I expect at least 100 words in paragraph form.
Astronony is a Grade 7 unit. Grade 7 in Canada isusually 12 to 13.
In article <MPG.44751fcae1330f5a989ebe@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10ufadb$2j821$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 18/05/2026 14:26, The Doctor wrote:Supposed to have
[quoted text muted]
(The glow has gone, and Thea wakes up.)
DOCTOR: Come and sit down. You'll be all right.
COLBY: Embryo what?
DOCTOR: Embryo Fendahleen. A creature from my own mythology.
perished when the fifth planet broke up. At least, so they said.
Gallyfreyan mythology, therefore the 5th planet in the system of
Gallifrey. Basic comprehension really.
[quoted text muted]
[Tardis]
(In flight.)
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles
out and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
The 5th planet is 107,000,000 miles out from the sun in the system of
Gallifrey.
Mars on the other hand is the 4th planet in the Earth's solar system and >>> is 142 million miles out from the sun.
Now answer this question, how can a 5th planet be closer than a 4th
planet in the same solar system?
The answer is that there are NOT in the same solar system. The planet
the Fendahl came from was the 5 planet in the solar system of GALLIFREY! >>>
That's a good case. I concede the point.
I don't. The Doctor was travelling 12 000 000 years back in time
107 000 000 miles from Earth.
On 19/05/2026 03:36, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ufh0n$2lg7s$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 17:52, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ufb42$2jfrg$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 14:55, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10uf41c$1gbg$9@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10uevgf$2flbd$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
[quoted text muted]
approx 680 year to get here.
Now multiply that by 300,000/17 ie. 17,647.05882352941 and what do you >>>>>>>> get? 12,000,000 years at 1/17,647.05882352941 of the speed of light. >>>>>>>>
All right some context coming up
Thanks for that. The script's handy to this.
Sooo... they just say "the fifth planet." IMO it's intuitive to assume >>>>>> the fifth Solar planet, the former asteroid belt, but it doesn't
actually say.
NO IT IS NOT! The Doctor refers to his own Gallifreyan mythology in the >>>>> very same sentence therefore the ONLY possible logical interpretation of >>>>> what he said is that he's referring to his own 5th plant.
5th Planet of which system?
"DOCTOR: Embryo Fendahleen. A creature from my own mythology. Supposed >>>>> to have perished when the fifth planet broke up. At least, so they said." >>>>>
He doesn't even mention a solar system until later when he's inside the >>>>> TARDIS and once again he's referring to his own solar system, especially >>>>> given the the distance he states for the orbit of the 5th planet which >>>>> is around 1/3 closer to it's sun that than Mars is to ours. Do the >research.
Did anyone here apart from me pass their O-Level English Language and >>>>> O-Level Mathematics (or equivalent) exams with decent grades?
Advanced math here.
Degree level here along with physics including astronomy.
Now, what about your English Language?
Before that.
Do you have an O-Level or equivalent in English Language because it's
clear you can't have scored anything in the comprehension or the essay >papers?
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles out
and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
107 000 000 miles from Earth!
No. From Gallifey's sun.
And give an AU is 93 000 000 miles,
Did they not teach you the concept of orbits? You understand that Earth
has one around the sun don't you? You can't specify that a planet was
such and such a distance from Earth 12 million years ago. It could have
been at double or triple that distance at any time. You understand how >orbits work right? Besides which the system the Doctor was referring to
was that of Gallifrey because he's referring to his own mythology. Learn >some basic comprehension along with basic astronomy.
The 5th Planet would be slightly over 2 AUs (2 and 14/93 AUs)
from the Sun.
The Doctor is referring to his own mythology, the novelisation says 170 >million miles FROM Gallifey's sun, and even still that is inside the >distance of the Earth's asteroid belt even if it were in the Earth's
system which it is NOT!
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 19/05/2026 03:45, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:00, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 3:34 am, The True Doctor wrote:No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sun in
On 16/05/2026 05:02, The Doctor wrote:
This is a classic!
Sorry but the information from ChatGPT and Google Gamini are not as >>>>>> accurate as view it.
What you have written is not a review. It's a series of notes.
AS USUAL for the asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their
joy of child sexual molestation cleanup)!
Where is your analysis?
Wanda as Miss Ransome. Yes she is talented and should have been the >>>>>> Doctor's companion with Jamie instead of Victoria Waterfield.
The Scientists - A great misguised lot trying to see on the
evolution of mankind.
They open up a fissure in space - Time and the Doctor to the Rescue >>>>>> with Leela.
Note that the Fissure did get the attention of the Doctor.
also, IotF was set in 1984 Fetchborough.
Horro Claasic indeed.
The Doctor being scared off by a legend of the Fendahl.
The 5th Planet that become the asteroid belt. Hmm! Interesting
concept.
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same
system as Gallifry and the Time Lords placed it in a time loop so
even if it formed an asteroid belt 12 million years ago it's isn't
the one in our Solar System which is 4.6 billion years old and it
wouldn't be possible to observe it in Gallyfrey's solar system
A Very minor nit-pick .... We live in THE Solar System because the
Ancient Greeks (or whomever) named Our Star 'Sol'. Gallyfreyian's might >>>
Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any sun,
ie. a star orbited by planets.
have named they star 'SOL', but I doubt it so they don't live in a Solar >>>> System . Stellar System, sure, but not the Solar System.
The terms solar system and star system (stellar system) are
interchangeable and hardly anyone uses the term stellar system anyway.
The Sun is a star.
Oh really? I thought it was a giant torch carried in Helios' chariot
across the sky.
What exactly is the point that you are trying to make Mr. AI chat bot?
because the 5th planet is still inside a time loop. One more reason
why Chibnall's degenerate woke shit is not canon since the universe
has still not been taken over by the Fendahl.
Maybe this might have happened in Disney's now missing THIRD Season.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 19/05/2026 03:41, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ufide$2lvag$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 14:09, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ueie3$2bnu8$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 17/05/2026 20:56, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ud36c$1tcfo$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 17/05/2026 19:08, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same system
as Gallifry
Are you sure? Where is that said?
It's said when the Doctor and Leela head back to the TARDIS to carry out
some investigations because the Fendahl was the stuff of Time Lord >>>>>>> nightmares. It was the 5th planet in the Gallifrey's system which blew >>>>>>> up 12 million years ago and sent the skull flying off to Earth where it >>>>>>> was discovered in Africa. Then the Doctor discovered that the Time Lords
put the planet in a time loop and kept it all hushed up, so he slammed >>>>>>> the data cards on the TARDIS console in disgust. Therefore this
precludes it forming any kind of asteroid belt anywhere since the Time >>>>>>> Lords did not want any fragments of the planet to escape and carry the >>>>>>> Fendahl away with them. But they obviously missed one.
Assuming it was going at 17.0 km/s the same speed as Voyager 1 it would >>>>>>> have travelled 680 light years to get to Earth, meaning Gallifrey is 680
light years away which sounds reasonable.
I know you were paying close attention, but all the rest of us took it >>>>>>>> the other way, and online sources also agree that it was Sol's fifth >>>>>>>> planet.
The asteroid belt in the Solar System is 4.6 billion years old. The >>>>>>> Fendahl's skull was only 12 million years old. That's an astronomical >>>>>>> difference. You should not rely on sources generated by AI or AI >>>>>>> chatbots like Yads. There's no mention of any asteroid belt in either to
televised episodes or the Target novelisation which I own.
That how can the Fendahl wpid out life on Mars?
It didn't. The Ice Warriors are still there.
After the Fendahl wiped out the native life.
The native life were the Ice Warriors and they didn't evolve in the last >>> 12 million years. Did they not teach you biology and evolution at
school? Oh, no, wait... You think humans have only existed for 6000
years and they were created by God rather than having evolved from
primates. Are you sure you studied astronomy? Did they not teach you
about the big bang, inflation, the Hubble Constant and the expansion of
the universe and how it might continue? Do you want to write an essay
about the above to show me what you actually know?
Yes!
Still The Doctor did say the Fendalhl wiped out life on Mars
on its way to Earth.
No he didn't. He said it probably passed Mars along the way. Which in no
way contradicts what I already said since Mars is on route from
Gallifrey's solar system to Earth and the Doctor makes it explicitly
clear he is talking about his own people.
Why would the Time Lords have nightmares about a life form from a planet >outside of their solar system? Why would it be in their mythology? Why
would they try to erase it's existence? It's their 5th planet not ours.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 19/05/2026 03:43, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0ppxkw5iw5tea002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Do you seriously think the asteroid belt is only 12
million years old?
Did they not teach you how old it actually is and how
it formed?
He won't need an online script for this one! It's all in his
special book.
The explain the asteroid belt
Do you want to explain that to me? Explain how the solar
system came into being. I expect at least 100 words in
paragraph form.
Well, it'll probably start something like this:
In the beginning god created the heavens and the earth...
Yes just that you misspelled God.
No he didn't. He mistranslated the Hebrew word Elohim which means THE
GODS, plural.
i
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
In article <10ugnvf$30ig4$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 03:36, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ufh0n$2lg7s$1@dont-email.me>,research.
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 17:52, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ufb42$2jfrg$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 14:55, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10uf41c$1gbg$9@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10uevgf$2flbd$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
[quoted text muted]
approx 680 year to get here.
Now multiply that by 300,000/17 ie. 17,647.05882352941 and what do you
get? 12,000,000 years at 1/17,647.05882352941 of the speed of light. >>>>>>>>>
All right some context coming up
Thanks for that. The script's handy to this.
Sooo... they just say "the fifth planet." IMO it's intuitive to assume >>>>>>> the fifth Solar planet, the former asteroid belt, but it doesn't >>>>>>> actually say.
NO IT IS NOT! The Doctor refers to his own Gallifreyan mythology in the >>>>>> very same sentence therefore the ONLY possible logical interpretation of >>>>>> what he said is that he's referring to his own 5th plant.
5th Planet of which system?
"DOCTOR: Embryo Fendahleen. A creature from my own mythology. Supposed >>>>>> to have perished when the fifth planet broke up. At least, so they said."
He doesn't even mention a solar system until later when he's inside the >>>>>> TARDIS and once again he's referring to his own solar system, especially >>>>>> given the the distance he states for the orbit of the 5th planet which >>>>>> is around 1/3 closer to it's sun that than Mars is to ours. Do the
Did anyone here apart from me pass their O-Level English Language and >>>>>> O-Level Mathematics (or equivalent) exams with decent grades?
Advanced math here.
Degree level here along with physics including astronomy.
Now, what about your English Language?
Before that.
Do you have an O-Level or equivalent in English Language because it's
clear you can't have scored anything in the comprehension or the essay
papers?
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles out
and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
107 000 000 miles from Earth!
No. From Gallifey's sun.
And give an AU is 93 000 000 miles,
Did they not teach you the concept of orbits? You understand that Earth
has one around the sun don't you? You can't specify that a planet was
such and such a distance from Earth 12 million years ago. It could have
been at double or triple that distance at any time. You understand how
orbits work right? Besides which the system the Doctor was referring to
was that of Gallifrey because he's referring to his own mythology. Learn
some basic comprehension along with basic astronomy.
The 5th Planet would be slightly over 2 AUs (2 and 14/93 AUs)
from the Sun.
The Doctor is referring to his own mythology, the novelisation says 170
million miles FROM Gallifey's sun, and even still that is inside the
distance of the Earth's asteroid belt even if it were in the Earth's
system which it is NOT!
He said 5th Planet. Did he explicit say which Galaxy?
On 19/05/2026 03:40, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ufhtl$2lqjh$1@dont-email.me>,of time!!)
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 17:50, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ufadb$2j821$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 14:26, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10uevgf$2flbd$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:56, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 8:21 pm, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 4:59 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 17/05/2026 19:08, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message: >>>>>>>>>>>> What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same >>>>>>>>>>>> system
as Gallifry
Are you sure? Where is that said?
It's said when the Doctor and Leela head back to the TARDIS to carry >>>>>>>>>> out some investigations because the Fendahl was the stuff of Time >>>>>>>>>> Lord nightmares. It was the 5th planet in the Gallifrey's system >>>>>>>>>> which blew up 12 million years ago and sent the skull flying off to >>>>>>>>>> Earth where it was discovered in Africa. Then the Doctor discovered >>>>>>>>>> that the Time Lords put the planet in a time loop and kept it all >>>>>>>>>> hushed up, so he slammed the data cards on the TARDIS console in >>>>>>>>>> disgust. Therefore this precludes it forming any kind of asteroid >>>>>>>>>> belt anywhere since the Time Lords did not want any fragments of the >>>>>>>>>> planet to escape and carry the Fendahl away with them. But they >>>>>>>>>> obviously missed one.
Assuming it was going at 17.0 km/s the same speed as Voyager 1 it >>>>>>>>>> would have travelled 680 light years to get to Earth, meaning >>>>>>>>>> Gallifrey is 680 light years away which sounds reasonable.
No it doesn't!!
Sorry!! WHAT?? If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle >>>>>>>>> was travelling at 17.0 km/s, it would take a HELL of a lot longer than
680 years to reach Earth (like about 17,500 times that length
Supposed to have
Where the hell did I say it would take it 680 years?
I said it took it 12 million years to reach Earth. Or rather the Doctor >>>>>>> said it took it that long.
If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle was travelling at
the speed of light (approx 300,000 Km/sec), it would take approx ONE >>>>>>>>> year to get here.
Error!! Error!! If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle was
travelling at the speed of light (approx 300,000 Km/sec), it would take
approx 680 year to get here.
Now multiply that by 300,000/17 ie. 17,647.05882352941 and what do you >>>>>>> get? 12,000,000 years at 1/17,647.05882352941 of the speed of light. >>>>>>>
All right some context coming up
DOCTOR: They look like embryo Fendahleen to me.
(The glow has gone, and Thea wakes up.)
DOCTOR: Come and sit down. You'll be all right.
COLBY: Embryo what?
DOCTOR: Embryo Fendahleen. A creature from my own mythology.
perished when the fifth planet broke up. At least, so they said.
Gallyfreyan mythology, therefore the 5th planet in the system of
Gallifrey. Basic comprehension really.
Where do you imply that?
It's explicit from what the Doctor said. There is no other possible
interpretation. He's a Time Lord from the planet Gallifrey referring to
his own Gallifreyan mythology, therefore his own fifth planet.
Did you pass English Language?
Yes Gallifreyan mythology.
You passed Gallifeyan mythology? I don't remember that being in the
English syllabus.
Galaxy not determined until
COLBY: A creature from mythology? Do you know what you're talking about? >>>>>> DOCTOR: Well, you saw it. If it survived twelve million years, it's energy
reserves must be enormous.
COLBY: Twelve million? Why did you say twelve million?
DOCTOR: What? Well, about twelve million. That's when the fifth planet >>>>>> broke up. There are four thousand million people here on your planet, >>>>>> and if I'm right, within a year there'll be just one left alive. Just one.
...
[Tardis]
(In flight.)
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles
out and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
The 5th planet is 107,000,000 miles out from the sun in the system of >>>>> Gallifrey.
How far is Gallifrey from its star?
At a guess about the same distance as Earth is from the sun. Somewhere >inside the habitable zone, roughly between the distance of the orbits of >Venus and Mars for a main sequence star the size of the sun.
Mars on the other hand is the 4th planet in the Earth's solar system and >>>>> is 142 million miles out from the sun.
49 000 000 miles from Earth.
Wrong. The Earth moves in an orbit and so does Mars. The do not orbit >equidistant from each other.
What about Jupiter?
And (142/93) AIs is 1.52688172043010752688 AUs.
So what? The Fendahl came from Gallifrey's solar system not ours. The
Doctor makes that abundantly clear.
--could do that.circle of
Now answer this question, how can a 5th planet be closer than a 4th
planet in the same solar system?
The answer is that there are NOT in the same solar system. The planet >>>>> the Fendahl came from was the 5 planet in the solar system of GALLIFREY! >>>>>
LEELA: Do you think this thing, the Fendahl, comes from the fifth planet?
DOCTOR: Well, it came from it a long time ago,
before your species evolved on Earth.
LEELA: How did it travel?
DOCTOR: What?
LEELA: Well, you said there's only one. It could not build
a spacecraft. How did it get to Earth?
DOCTOR: Well, it. Well, it probably used that enormous stockpile
of energy to project itself across space.
LEELA: Oh, you mean the way lightning travels.
DOCTOR: No. Yes, well, something like that. Humans speak
of astral projection, travelling psychically to different planets. >>>>>> That could be a race memory.
LEELA: Race memory?
DOCTOR: Yes. You see, sometimes people dream they've been
to other places. It's, er, deja vu. No?
(On Earth, Tyler watches a white van come up the gravel drive to
the main house. Ted Moss and three other men get out.
Leela is sleeping on the console room floor. She wakes and has
her knife ready when the Doctor enters.)
DOCTOR: No, no, no. Put it away, put it away. It's a good thing
your tribe never developed guns. They'd have woken with a start
one morning and wiped themselves out.
LEELA: There was something chasing me. I, I couldn't move.
Just a dream, I suppose.
(The Doctor breaks the three plastic cards he was carrying.)
LEELA: Hey, what's wrong?
DOCTOR: I've been checking the old data banks.
There's no record at all of a fifth planet.
LEELA: Does that matter?
DOCTOR: Well of course it matters! We Time Lords are a very
meticulous people. You have to be when you live as long as we do.
All information is recorded.
LEELA: Perhaps there wasn't any.
DOCTOR: What?
LEELA: Information.
DOCTOR: What?
(He switches on the scanner. The view is green and swirling.)
DOCTOR: Of course. That's why there's no record of the planet.
LEELA: Why?
DOCTOR: That impression's produced by a time loop.
(Lights are flashing red and yellow on the console.)
LEELA: Time loop?
DOCTOR: Yes, a time loop. All memory of a planet's been erased by a
time, making data and its records invisible. Only a Time Lord
LEELA: That's very clever.
DOCTOR: That's criminal! We've been on a wild goose chase. We'd better get
back. Let's hope we're not too far round that time loop.
LEELA: Is there anything I can do?
DOCTOR: Yes. No, no. I'll just set the coordinates and we're on our way. >>>>>>
So what 5th Planet in a Gallifreyan system are you talking about
The 5th planer the blew up 12 million years ago. The one the Doctor was >>>>> referring it.
Use above script for your defense.Does anyone around here have any basic skill in both English
comprehension and mathematics?
Add astonomy.
You can't even spell astronomy correctly and you don't even realise it,
so why should I believe you when with your level of English you wouldn't >>> have been able to write a dissertation.
Do you seriously think the asteroid belt is only 12 million years old?
Older and fragments of a planet.
That is not the commonly accepted theory. It's 4.6 billion years old and >made from objects that clumped together which were no sufficient to form
a planet.
Did they not teach you how old it actually is and how it formed?
Do you want to explain that to me? Explain how the solar system came
into being. I expect at least 100 words in paragraph form.
Astronony is a Grade 7 unit. Grade 7 in Canada isusually 12 to 13.
Oh, so this is secondary school astronomy. I studied it at third year
degree level.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 19/05/2026 03:42, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.44751fcae1330f5a989ebe@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10ufadb$2j821$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 18/05/2026 14:26, The Doctor wrote:Supposed to have
[quoted text muted]
(The glow has gone, and Thea wakes up.)
DOCTOR: Come and sit down. You'll be all right.
COLBY: Embryo what?
DOCTOR: Embryo Fendahleen. A creature from my own mythology.
perished when the fifth planet broke up. At least, so they said.
Gallyfreyan mythology, therefore the 5th planet in the system of
Gallifrey. Basic comprehension really.
[quoted text muted]
[Tardis]
(In flight.)
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles
out and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
The 5th planet is 107,000,000 miles out from the sun in the system of
Gallifrey.
Mars on the other hand is the 4th planet in the Earth's solar system and >>>> is 142 million miles out from the sun.
Now answer this question, how can a 5th planet be closer than a 4th
planet in the same solar system?
The answer is that there are NOT in the same solar system. The planet
the Fendahl came from was the 5 planet in the solar system of GALLIFREY! >>>>
That's a good case. I concede the point.
I don't. The Doctor was travelling 12 000 000 years back in time
107 000 000 miles from Earth.
No he wast. He was inside the TARDIS studying Time Lord records dating
back 12 million years into the history of his own solar system and got
angry at the Time Lords trying to erase the history of their 5th planet
by placing it inside a time loop.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 19/05/2026 05:48, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ugnvf$30ig4$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 03:36, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ufh0n$2lg7s$1@dont-email.me>,research.
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 17:52, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ufb42$2jfrg$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 14:55, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10uf41c$1gbg$9@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10uevgf$2flbd$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
[quoted text muted]
approx 680 year to get here.
Now multiply that by 300,000/17 ie. 17,647.05882352941 and what do you
get? 12,000,000 years at 1/17,647.05882352941 of the speed of light. >>>>>>>>>>
All right some context coming up
Thanks for that. The script's handy to this.
Sooo... they just say "the fifth planet." IMO it's intuitive to assume >>>>>>>> the fifth Solar planet, the former asteroid belt, but it doesn't >>>>>>>> actually say.
NO IT IS NOT! The Doctor refers to his own Gallifreyan mythology in the >>>>>>> very same sentence therefore the ONLY possible logical interpretation of
what he said is that he's referring to his own 5th plant.
5th Planet of which system?
"DOCTOR: Embryo Fendahleen. A creature from my own mythology. Supposed >>>>>>> to have perished when the fifth planet broke up. At least, so they said."
He doesn't even mention a solar system until later when he's inside the >>>>>>> TARDIS and once again he's referring to his own solar system, especially
given the the distance he states for the orbit of the 5th planet which >>>>>>> is around 1/3 closer to it's sun that than Mars is to ours. Do the
Did anyone here apart from me pass their O-Level English Language and >>>>>>> O-Level Mathematics (or equivalent) exams with decent grades?
Advanced math here.
Degree level here along with physics including astronomy.
Now, what about your English Language?
Before that.
Do you have an O-Level or equivalent in English Language because it's
clear you can't have scored anything in the comprehension or the essay
papers?
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles out
and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
107 000 000 miles from Earth!
No. From Gallifey's sun.
And give an AU is 93 000 000 miles,
Did they not teach you the concept of orbits? You understand that Earth
has one around the sun don't you? You can't specify that a planet was
such and such a distance from Earth 12 million years ago. It could have
been at double or triple that distance at any time. You understand how
orbits work right? Besides which the system the Doctor was referring to
was that of Gallifrey because he's referring to his own mythology. Learn >>> some basic comprehension along with basic astronomy.
The 5th Planet would be slightly over 2 AUs (2 and 14/93 AUs)
from the Sun.
The Doctor is referring to his own mythology, the novelisation says 170
million miles FROM Gallifey's sun, and even still that is inside the
distance of the Earth's asteroid belt even if it were in the Earth's
system which it is NOT!
He said 5th Planet. Did he explicit say which Galaxy?
He explicitly said in the same sentence that he was referring to an
event in his own people's mythology, therefore he is referring to the
solar system that Gallifrey is in.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
In article <10ugpko$30u25$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 03:40, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ufhtl$2lqjh$1@dont-email.me>,of time!!)
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 17:50, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ufadb$2j821$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 14:26, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10uevgf$2flbd$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:56, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 8:21 pm, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 4:59 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 17/05/2026 19:08, The True Melissa wrote:No it doesn't!!
Verily, in article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>, did >>>>>>>>>>>> agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message: >>>>>>>>>>>>> What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same >>>>>>>>>>>>> system
as Gallifry
Are you sure? Where is that said?
It's said when the Doctor and Leela head back to the TARDIS to carry
out some investigations because the Fendahl was the stuff of Time >>>>>>>>>>> Lord nightmares. It was the 5th planet in the Gallifrey's system >>>>>>>>>>> which blew up 12 million years ago and sent the skull flying off to >>>>>>>>>>> Earth where it was discovered in Africa. Then the Doctor discovered >>>>>>>>>>> that the Time Lords put the planet in a time loop and kept it all >>>>>>>>>>> hushed up, so he slammed the data cards on the TARDIS console in >>>>>>>>>>> disgust. Therefore this precludes it forming any kind of asteroid >>>>>>>>>>> belt anywhere since the Time Lords did not want any fragments of the
planet to escape and carry the Fendahl away with them. But they >>>>>>>>>>> obviously missed one.
Assuming it was going at 17.0 km/s the same speed as Voyager 1 it >>>>>>>>>>> would have travelled 680 light years to get to Earth, meaning >>>>>>>>>>> Gallifrey is 680 light years away which sounds reasonable. >>>>>>>>>>
Sorry!! WHAT?? If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle >>>>>>>>>> was travelling at 17.0 km/s, it would take a HELL of a lot longer than
680 years to reach Earth (like about 17,500 times that length
Supposed to have
Where the hell did I say it would take it 680 years?
I said it took it 12 million years to reach Earth. Or rather the Doctor
said it took it that long.
If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle was travelling at
the speed of light (approx 300,000 Km/sec), it would take approx ONE >>>>>>>>>> year to get here.
Error!! Error!! If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle was
travelling at the speed of light (approx 300,000 Km/sec), it would take
approx 680 year to get here.
Now multiply that by 300,000/17 ie. 17,647.05882352941 and what do you >>>>>>>> get? 12,000,000 years at 1/17,647.05882352941 of the speed of light. >>>>>>>>
All right some context coming up
DOCTOR: They look like embryo Fendahleen to me.
(The glow has gone, and Thea wakes up.)
DOCTOR: Come and sit down. You'll be all right.
COLBY: Embryo what?
DOCTOR: Embryo Fendahleen. A creature from my own mythology.
perished when the fifth planet broke up. At least, so they said.
Gallyfreyan mythology, therefore the 5th planet in the system of
Gallifrey. Basic comprehension really.
Where do you imply that?
It's explicit from what the Doctor said. There is no other possible
interpretation. He's a Time Lord from the planet Gallifrey referring to >>>> his own Gallifreyan mythology, therefore his own fifth planet.
Did you pass English Language?
Yes Gallifreyan mythology.
You passed Gallifeyan mythology? I don't remember that being in the
English syllabus.
:-)
Galaxy not determined until
COLBY: A creature from mythology? Do you know what you're talking about?
DOCTOR: Well, you saw it. If it survived twelve million years, it's energy
reserves must be enormous.
COLBY: Twelve million? Why did you say twelve million?
DOCTOR: What? Well, about twelve million. That's when the fifth planet >>>>>>> broke up. There are four thousand million people here on your planet, >>>>>>> and if I'm right, within a year there'll be just one left alive. Just one.
...
[Tardis]
(In flight.)
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles
out and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
The 5th planet is 107,000,000 miles out from the sun in the system of >>>>>> Gallifrey.
How far is Gallifrey from its star?
At a guess about the same distance as Earth is from the sun. Somewhere
inside the habitable zone, roughly between the distance of the orbits of
Venus and Mars for a main sequence star the size of the sun.
Recall Gallifrey is 100x to 1000x bigger than Earth.
Mars on the other hand is the 4th planet in the Earth's solar system and >>>>>> is 142 million miles out from the sun.
49 000 000 miles from Earth.
Wrong. The Earth moves in an orbit and so does Mars. The do not orbit
equidistant from each other.
What about min and max distances then?
What about Jupiter?
And (142/93) AIs is 1.52688172043010752688 AUs.
So what? The Fendahl came from Gallifrey's solar system not ours. The
Doctor makes that abundantly clear.
Then
how come from the script
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles out
and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
Start point Earth.
Now answer this question, how can a 5th planet be closer than a 4th >>>>>> planet in the same solar system?
The answer is that there are NOT in the same solar system. The planet >>>>>> the Fendahl came from was the 5 planet in the solar system of GALLIFREY! >>>>>>
LEELA: Do you think this thing, the Fendahl, comes from the fifth planet?
DOCTOR: Well, it came from it a long time ago,
before your species evolved on Earth.
LEELA: How did it travel?
DOCTOR: What?
LEELA: Well, you said there's only one. It could not build
a spacecraft. How did it get to Earth?
DOCTOR: Well, it. Well, it probably used that enormous stockpile >>>>>>> of energy to project itself across space.
LEELA: Oh, you mean the way lightning travels.
DOCTOR: No. Yes, well, something like that. Humans speak
of astral projection, travelling psychically to different planets. >>>>>>> That could be a race memory.
LEELA: Race memory?
DOCTOR: Yes. You see, sometimes people dream they've been
to other places. It's, er, deja vu. No?
(On Earth, Tyler watches a white van come up the gravel drive to >>>>>>> the main house. Ted Moss and three other men get out.
Leela is sleeping on the console room floor. She wakes and has
her knife ready when the Doctor enters.)
DOCTOR: No, no, no. Put it away, put it away. It's a good thing
your tribe never developed guns. They'd have woken with a start
one morning and wiped themselves out.
LEELA: There was something chasing me. I, I couldn't move.
Just a dream, I suppose.
(The Doctor breaks the three plastic cards he was carrying.)
LEELA: Hey, what's wrong?
DOCTOR: I've been checking the old data banks.
There's no record at all of a fifth planet.
LEELA: Does that matter?
DOCTOR: Well of course it matters! We Time Lords are a very
meticulous people. You have to be when you live as long as we do. >>>>>>> All information is recorded.
LEELA: Perhaps there wasn't any.
DOCTOR: What?
LEELA: Information.
DOCTOR: What?
(He switches on the scanner. The view is green and swirling.)
DOCTOR: Of course. That's why there's no record of the planet.
LEELA: Why?
DOCTOR: That impression's produced by a time loop.
(Lights are flashing red and yellow on the console.)
--could do that.LEELA: Time loop?
DOCTOR: Yes, a time loop. All memory of a planet's been erased by a >>>> circle of
time, making data and its records invisible. Only a Time Lord
LEELA: That's very clever.
DOCTOR: That's criminal! We've been on a wild goose chase. We'd better get
back. Let's hope we're not too far round that time loop.
LEELA: Is there anything I can do?
DOCTOR: Yes. No, no. I'll just set the coordinates and we're on our way.
So what 5th Planet in a Gallifreyan system are you talking about >>>>>>>
The 5th planer the blew up 12 million years ago. The one the Doctor was >>>>>> referring it.
Use above script for your defense.Does anyone around here have any basic skill in both English
comprehension and mathematics?
Add astonomy.
You can't even spell astronomy correctly and you don't even realise it, >>>> so why should I believe you when with your level of English you wouldn't >>>> have been able to write a dissertation.
Do you seriously think the asteroid belt is only 12 million years old?
Older and fragments of a planet.
That is not the commonly accepted theory. It's 4.6 billion years old and
made from objects that clumped together which were no sufficient to form
a planet.
Did they not teach you how old it actually is and how it formed?
Do you want to explain that to me? Explain how the solar system came
into being. I expect at least 100 words in paragraph form.
Astronony is a Grade 7 unit. Grade 7 in Canada isusually 12 to 13.
Oh, so this is secondary school astronomy. I studied it at third year
degree level.
In article <10ugpp4$30u25$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 03:42, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.44751fcae1330f5a989ebe@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10ufadb$2j821$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 18/05/2026 14:26, The Doctor wrote:Supposed to have
[quoted text muted]
(The glow has gone, and Thea wakes up.)
DOCTOR: Come and sit down. You'll be all right.
COLBY: Embryo what?
DOCTOR: Embryo Fendahleen. A creature from my own mythology.
perished when the fifth planet broke up. At least, so they said.
Gallyfreyan mythology, therefore the 5th planet in the system of
Gallifrey. Basic comprehension really.
[quoted text muted]
[Tardis]
(In flight.)
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles
out and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
The 5th planet is 107,000,000 miles out from the sun in the system of >>>>> Gallifrey.
Mars on the other hand is the 4th planet in the Earth's solar system and >>>>> is 142 million miles out from the sun.
Now answer this question, how can a 5th planet be closer than a 4th
planet in the same solar system?
The answer is that there are NOT in the same solar system. The planet >>>>> the Fendahl came from was the 5 planet in the solar system of GALLIFREY! >>>>>
That's a good case. I concede the point.
I don't. The Doctor was travelling 12 000 000 years back in time
107 000 000 miles from Earth.
No he wast. He was inside the TARDIS studying Time Lord records dating
back 12 million years into the history of his own solar system and got
angry at the Time Lords trying to erase the history of their 5th planet
by placing it inside a time loop.
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles out
and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
LEELA: Do you think this thing, the Fendahl, comes from the fifth planet? DOCTOR: Well, it came from it a long time ago,
before your species evolved on Earth.
LEELA: How did it travel?
DOCTOR: What?
LEELA: Well, you said there's only one. It could not build a spacecraft.
How did it get to Earth?
DOCTOR: Well, it. Well, it probably used that enormous stockpile
of energy to project itself across space.
LEELA: Oh, you mean the way lightning travels.
DOCTOR: No. Yes, well, something like that. Humans speak of astral projection,
travelling psychically to different planets. That could be a race memory. LEELA: Race memory?
As for the angry, he should be grateful the--
Time Lords are protecting the universe.
In article <10ugo6m$30ig4$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 03:45, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:00, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 3:34 am, The True Doctor wrote:No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sun in >>>> Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any sun, >>>> ie. a star orbited by planets.
On 16/05/2026 05:02, The Doctor wrote:
This is a classic!
Sorry but the information from ChatGPT and Google Gamini are not as >>>>>>> accurate as view it.
What you have written is not a review. It's a series of notes.
AS USUAL for the asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their
joy of child sexual molestation cleanup)!
Where is your analysis?
Wanda as Miss Ransome. Yes she is talented and should have been the >>>>>>> Doctor's companion with Jamie instead of Victoria Waterfield.
The Scientists - A great misguised lot trying to see on the
evolution of mankind.
They open up a fissure in space - Time and the Doctor to the Rescue >>>>>>> with Leela.
Note that the Fissure did get the attention of the Doctor.
also, IotF was set in 1984 Fetchborough.
Horro Claasic indeed.
The Doctor being scared off by a legend of the Fendahl.
The 5th Planet that become the asteroid belt. Hmm! Interesting >>>>>>> concept.
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same
system as Gallifry and the Time Lords placed it in a time loop so
even if it formed an asteroid belt 12 million years ago it's isn't >>>>>> the one in our Solar System which is 4.6 billion years old and it
wouldn't be possible to observe it in Gallyfrey's solar system
A Very minor nit-pick .... We live in THE Solar System because the
Ancient Greeks (or whomever) named Our Star 'Sol'. Gallyfreyian's might >>>>
have named they star 'SOL', but I doubt it so they don't live in a Solar >>>>> System . Stellar System, sure, but not the Solar System.
The terms solar system and star system (stellar system) are
interchangeable and hardly anyone uses the term stellar system anyway. >>>>
The Sun is a star.
Oh really? I thought it was a giant torch carried in Helios' chariot
across the sky.
What exactly is the point that you are trying to make Mr. AI chat bot?
The point about Sol.
Verily, in article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sun in
Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any sun,
ie. a star orbited by planets.
Many use Sol for our star's name, Terra for our planet's name, and Luna
for our moon's name.
Capitalization matters. A solar system isn't> necessarily the Solarsystem... but most people would probably say "star
system" for others.
In article <10ugoti$30okn$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 03:41, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ufide$2lvag$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 14:09, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ueie3$2bnu8$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 17/05/2026 20:56, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ud36c$1tcfo$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 17/05/2026 19:08, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same system
as Gallifry
Are you sure? Where is that said?
It's said when the Doctor and Leela head back to the TARDIS to carry out
some investigations because the Fendahl was the stuff of Time Lord >>>>>>>> nightmares. It was the 5th planet in the Gallifrey's system which blew >>>>>>>> up 12 million years ago and sent the skull flying off to Earth where it
was discovered in Africa. Then the Doctor discovered that the Time Lords
put the planet in a time loop and kept it all hushed up, so he slammed >>>>>>>> the data cards on the TARDIS console in disgust. Therefore this >>>>>>>> precludes it forming any kind of asteroid belt anywhere since the Time >>>>>>>> Lords did not want any fragments of the planet to escape and carry the >>>>>>>> Fendahl away with them. But they obviously missed one.
Assuming it was going at 17.0 km/s the same speed as Voyager 1 it would
have travelled 680 light years to get to Earth, meaning Gallifrey is 680
light years away which sounds reasonable.
I know you were paying close attention, but all the rest of us took it
the other way, and online sources also agree that it was Sol's fifth >>>>>>>>> planet.
The asteroid belt in the Solar System is 4.6 billion years old. The >>>>>>>> Fendahl's skull was only 12 million years old. That's an astronomical >>>>>>>> difference. You should not rely on sources generated by AI or AI >>>>>>>> chatbots like Yads. There's no mention of any asteroid belt in either to
televised episodes or the Target novelisation which I own.
That how can the Fendahl wpid out life on Mars?
It didn't. The Ice Warriors are still there.
After the Fendahl wiped out the native life.
The native life were the Ice Warriors and they didn't evolve in the last >>>> 12 million years. Did they not teach you biology and evolution at
school? Oh, no, wait... You think humans have only existed for 6000
years and they were created by God rather than having evolved from
primates. Are you sure you studied astronomy? Did they not teach you
about the big bang, inflation, the Hubble Constant and the expansion of >>>> the universe and how it might continue? Do you want to write an essay
about the above to show me what you actually know?
Yes!
Still The Doctor did say the Fendalhl wiped out life on Mars
on its way to Earth.
No he didn't. He said it probably passed Mars along the way. Which in no
way contradicts what I already said since Mars is on route from
Gallifrey's solar system to Earth and the Doctor makes it explicitly
clear he is talking about his own people.
Why would the Time Lords have nightmares about a life form from a planet
outside of their solar system? Why would it be in their mythology? Why
would they try to erase it's existence? It's their 5th planet not ours.
From the script
COLBY: So when the Time Lords acted, it was too late.So what? What is your point?
The Fendahl had already come here.
DOCTOR: Yes, probably taking in Mars on it's way through.
COLBY: Then it got itself buried, but not killed.
DOCTOR: The Fendahl is death. How do you kill death? No, what happened was this. The energy amassed by the Fendahl was stored in the skull and dissipated
slowly as a biological transmutation field. Now, any appropriate lifeform that
came within the field was altered so that it ultimately evolved into something
suitable for the Fendahl to use.
COLBY: Are you saying that skull created man?
DOCTOR: No, I'm saying it may have effected his evolution.
And then there is Scaroth the Jaggeroth.
On 19/05/2026 03:40, The Doctor wrote:
Did you pass English Language?
Yes Gallifreyan mythology.
You passed Gallifeyan mythology? I don't remember that being in the
English syllabus.
At a guess about the same distance as Earth is from the sun. Somewhere inside the habitable zone, roughly between the distance of the orbits of Venus and Mars for a main sequence star the size of the sun.
Then
how come from the script
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles out
and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
Start point Earth.
It's already been explained to you that the Doctor is referring to his
own solar system and the script is explicit in that.
On 18/05/2026 22:51, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sun in
Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any sun,
ie. a star orbited by planets.
Many use Sol for our star's name, Terra for our planet's name, and Luna
for our moon's name.
You would if you're Italian. In other languages they have different names.
<<AI Overview solar system/'s??l? ?s?st?m/
A solar system is a star and all the celestial objects that are bound to
it by gravity. This includes planets, dwarf planets, moons, asteroids, comets, and dust, all orbiting the central star.
When capitalized, the Solar System specifically refers to our own cosmic neighborhood?the Sun and everything that orbits it.>>
The script has it in lower case, as does the Target novelisation.
Therefore, it isn't reoffering to our own cosmic neighbourhood, it's referring to an alien one, that of Gallifrey.
Verily, in article <10ugpko$30u25$1@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
At a guess about the same distance as Earth is from the sun. Somewhere inside the habitable zone, roughly between the distance of the orbits of Venus and Mars for a main sequence star the size of the sun.
Do we know that Gallifrey's star is a yellow dwarf? I haven't seen that information anywhere.
I'm trying to think of what the sun looks like on Gallifrey, when we've visited the Gallifreyan outdoors. Of course, those scenes have to be
shot in Earth's outdoors, and we couldn't expect them to build an
artificial sun with that era's budgets.
Did anyone here apart from me pass their O-Level English Language and O-Level Mathematics (or equivalent) exams with decent grades?
In article <10ufhtl$2lqjh$1@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 17:50, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ufadb$2j821$1@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor
<agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 14:26, The Doctor wrote:
It's explicit from what the Doctor said. There is no otherGallyfreyan mythology, therefore the 5th planet in the systemWhere do you imply that?
of Gallifrey. Basic comprehension really.
possible interpretation. He's a Time Lord from the planet Gallifrey
referring to his own Gallifreyan mythology, therefore his own fifth
planet.
Did you pass English Language?
Yes Gallifreyan mythology.
Galaxy not determined until
COLBY: A creature from mythology? Do you know what you're
talking about? DOCTOR: Well, you saw it. If it survived
twelve million years, it's energy reserves must be enormous.
COLBY: Twelve million? Why did you say twelve million?
DOCTOR: What? Well, about twelve million. That's when the
fifth planet broke up. There are four thousand million people
here on your planet, and if I'm right, within a year there'll
be just one left alive. Just one. ...
[Tardis]
(In flight.) DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven
million miles out and twelve million years back, so we've no
time to lose.
The 5th planet is 107,000,000 miles out from the sun in the
system of Gallifrey.
How far is Gallifrey from its star?
Mars on the other hand is the 4th planet in the Earth's solar
system and is 142 million miles out from the sun.
49 000 000 miles from Earth.
What about Jupiter?
And (142/93) AIs is 1.52688172043010752688 AUs.
Verily, in article <MPG.447603b711858e46989ec2@news.eternal-
september.org>, did thetruemelissa@gmail.com deliver unto us this
message:
Verily, in article <10ugpko$30u25$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
At a guess about the same distance as Earth is from the sun. Somewhere
inside the habitable zone, roughly between the distance of the orbits of >>> Venus and Mars for a main sequence star the size of the sun.
Do we know that Gallifrey's star is a yellow dwarf? I haven't seen that
information anywhere.
I'm trying to think of what the sun looks like on Gallifrey, when we've
visited the Gallifreyan outdoors. Of course, those scenes have to be
shot in Earth's outdoors, and we couldn't expect them to build an
artificial sun with that era's budgets.
Wait wait waaaaaaaait a minute. Gallifrey's sun is a binary pair, isn't
it?
https://tardis.fandom.com/wiki/Gallifrey#Star_system
Gallifrey probably orbits the larger red one.
The second star seemed to rise in the East .... and both set in the South!!
What a wacko orbit Gallifrey must have!!
On 18/05/2026 11:00, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 3:34 am, The True Doctor wrote:
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same
system as Gallifry and the Time Lords placed it in a time loop so
even if it formed an asteroid belt 12 million years ago it's isn't
the one in our Solar System which is 4.6 billion years old and it
wouldn't be possible to observe it in Gallyfrey's solar system
A Very minor nit-pick .... We live in THE Solar System because the
Ancient Greeks (or whomever) named Our Star 'Sol'. Gallyfreyian's might
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sun in Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any sun,
ie. a star orbited by planets.
have named they star 'SOL', but I doubt it so they don't live in a Solar
System . Stellar System, sure, but not the Solar System.
The terms solar system and star system (stellar system) are
interchangeable and hardly anyone uses the term stellar system anyway.
On 19/05/2026 03:45, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor
<agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:00, Daniel70 wrote:
A Very minor nit-pick .... We live in THE Solar System because
the Ancient Greeks (or whomever) named Our Star 'Sol'.
Gallyfreyian's might
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means
sun in Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies
to any sun, ie. a star orbited by planets.
have named they star 'SOL', but I doubt it so they don't live
in a Solar System . Stellar System, sure, but not the Solar
System.
The terms solar system and star system (stellar system) are
interchangeable and hardly anyone uses the term stellar system
anyway.
The Sun is a star.
Oh really? I thought it was a giant torch carried in Helios' chariot
across the sky.
What exactly is the point that you are trying to make Mr. AI chat
bot?
Verily, in article <10uhiru$37npd$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
The second star seemed to rise in the East .... and both set in
the South!!
What a wacko orbit Gallifrey must have!!
It didn't orbit the smaller star, so the smaller star didn't have a
straight path across the sky. Makes sense to me.
As for the vampires, check out State of Decay. Or don't, since the
rewatch parties will reach it soon.
On 19/05/2026 9:59 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10uhiru$37npd$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
The second star seemed to rise in the East .... and both set in
the South!!
What a wacko orbit Gallifrey must have!!
It didn't orbit the smaller star, so the smaller star didn't have a straight path across the sky. Makes sense to me.
The two stars would have orbited a common mid-point just as The Moon
doesn't really orbit The Earth, they both orbit a common mid-point,
which I think is just below The Earth's crust but nowhere near the
middle of The Earth.
As for the vampires, check out State of Decay. Or don't, since the
rewatch parties will reach it soon.
Ah!! So there ARE Vampires on Gallifrey, are there?
On 19/05/2026 05:56, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ugpko$30u25$1@dont-email.me>,longer than
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 03:40, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ufhtl$2lqjh$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 17:50, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ufadb$2j821$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 14:26, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10uevgf$2flbd$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:56, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 8:21 pm, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 4:59 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 17/05/2026 19:08, The True Melissa wrote:No it doesn't!!
Verily, in article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>, did >>>>>>>>>>>>> agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same >>>>>>>>>>>>>> system
as Gallifry
Are you sure? Where is that said?
It's said when the Doctor and Leela head back to the TARDIS to carry
out some investigations because the Fendahl was the stuff of Time >>>>>>>>>>>> Lord nightmares. It was the 5th planet in the Gallifrey's system >>>>>>>>>>>> which blew up 12 million years ago and sent the skull flying off to
Earth where it was discovered in Africa. Then the Doctor discovered
that the Time Lords put the planet in a time loop and kept it all >>>>>>>>>>>> hushed up, so he slammed the data cards on the TARDIS console in >>>>>>>>>>>> disgust. Therefore this precludes it forming any kind of asteroid >>>>>>>>>>>> belt anywhere since the Time Lords did not want any fragments of the
planet to escape and carry the Fendahl away with them. But they >>>>>>>>>>>> obviously missed one.
Assuming it was going at 17.0 km/s the same speed as Voyager 1 it >>>>>>>>>>>> would have travelled 680 light years to get to Earth, meaning >>>>>>>>>>>> Gallifrey is 680 light years away which sounds reasonable. >>>>>>>>>>>
Sorry!! WHAT?? If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle >>>>>>>>>>> was travelling at 17.0 km/s, it would take a HELL of a lot
would takeof time!!)680 years to reach Earth (like about 17,500 times that length
Where the hell did I say it would take it 680 years?
I said it took it 12 million years to reach Earth. Or rather the Doctor
said it took it that long.
If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle was >travelling at
the speed of light (approx 300,000 Km/sec), it would take approx ONE
year to get here.
Error!! Error!! If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a >vehicle was
travelling at the speed of light (approx 300,000 Km/sec), it
it's energySupposed to haveapprox 680 year to get here.
Now multiply that by 300,000/17 ie. 17,647.05882352941 and what do you
get? 12,000,000 years at 1/17,647.05882352941 of the speed of light. >>>>>>>>>
All right some context coming up
DOCTOR: They look like embryo Fendahleen to me.
(The glow has gone, and Thea wakes up.)
DOCTOR: Come and sit down. You'll be all right.
COLBY: Embryo what?
DOCTOR: Embryo Fendahleen. A creature from my own mythology.
perished when the fifth planet broke up. At least, so they said. >>>>>>>Gallyfreyan mythology, therefore the 5th planet in the system of >>>>>>> Gallifrey. Basic comprehension really.
Where do you imply that?
It's explicit from what the Doctor said. There is no other possible
interpretation. He's a Time Lord from the planet Gallifrey referring to >>>>> his own Gallifreyan mythology, therefore his own fifth planet.
Did you pass English Language?
Yes Gallifreyan mythology.
You passed Gallifeyan mythology? I don't remember that being in the
English syllabus.
:-)
Galaxy not determined until
COLBY: A creature from mythology? Do you know what you're talking about?
DOCTOR: Well, you saw it. If it survived twelve million years,
Just one.reserves must be enormous.
COLBY: Twelve million? Why did you say twelve million?
DOCTOR: What? Well, about twelve million. That's when the fifth planet >>>>>>>> broke up. There are four thousand million people here on your planet, >>>>>>>> and if I'm right, within a year there'll be just one left alive.
...
[Tardis]
(In flight.)
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles
out and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
The 5th planet is 107,000,000 miles out from the sun in the system of >>>>>>> Gallifrey.
How far is Gallifrey from its star?
At a guess about the same distance as Earth is from the sun. Somewhere
inside the habitable zone, roughly between the distance of the orbits of >>> Venus and Mars for a main sequence star the size of the sun.
Recall Gallifrey is 100x to 1000x bigger than Earth.
No it isn't. Do you think Gallifrey is bigger than the sun?
Mars on the other hand is the 4th planet in the Earth's solar system and
is 142 million miles out from the sun.
49 000 000 miles from Earth.
Wrong. The Earth moves in an orbit and so does Mars. The do not orbit
equidistant from each other.
What about min and max distances then?
Min and max distances of what?
What about Jupiter?
And (142/93) AIs is 1.52688172043010752688 AUs.
So what? The Fendahl came from Gallifrey's solar system not ours. The
Doctor makes that abundantly clear.
Then
how come from the script
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles out
and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
Start point Earth.
Start point GALLIFREY'S SUN!
fifth planet?
Now answer this question, how can a 5th planet be closer than a 4th >>>>>>> planet in the same solar system?
The answer is that there are NOT in the same solar system. The planet >>>>>>> the Fendahl came from was the 5 planet in the solar system of GALLIFREY!
LEELA: Do you think this thing, the Fendahl, comes from the
DOCTOR: Well, it came from it a long time ago,
before your species evolved on Earth.
LEELA: How did it travel?
DOCTOR: What?
LEELA: Well, you said there's only one. It could not build
a spacecraft. How did it get to Earth?
DOCTOR: Well, it. Well, it probably used that enormous stockpile >>>>>>>> of energy to project itself across space.
LEELA: Oh, you mean the way lightning travels.
DOCTOR: No. Yes, well, something like that. Humans speak
of astral projection, travelling psychically to different planets. >>>>>>>> That could be a race memory.
LEELA: Race memory?
DOCTOR: Yes. You see, sometimes people dream they've been
to other places. It's, er, deja vu. No?
(On Earth, Tyler watches a white van come up the gravel drive to >>>>>>>> the main house. Ted Moss and three other men get out.
Leela is sleeping on the console room floor. She wakes and has >>>>>>>> her knife ready when the Doctor enters.)
DOCTOR: No, no, no. Put it away, put it away. It's a good thing >>>>>>>> your tribe never developed guns. They'd have woken with a start >>>>>>>> one morning and wiped themselves out.
LEELA: There was something chasing me. I, I couldn't move.
Just a dream, I suppose.
(The Doctor breaks the three plastic cards he was carrying.)
LEELA: Hey, what's wrong?
DOCTOR: I've been checking the old data banks.
There's no record at all of a fifth planet.
LEELA: Does that matter?
DOCTOR: Well of course it matters! We Time Lords are a very
meticulous people. You have to be when you live as long as we do. >>>>>>>> All information is recorded.
LEELA: Perhaps there wasn't any.
DOCTOR: What?
LEELA: Information.
DOCTOR: What?
(He switches on the scanner. The view is green and swirling.)
DOCTOR: Of course. That's why there's no record of the planet. >>>>>>>> LEELA: Why?
DOCTOR: That impression's produced by a time loop.
(Lights are flashing red and yellow on the console.)
Do you see any green swirling haze like that anywhere between Mars and >Jupiter in the Earth's solar system? NO! There isn't any.
That's because the time loop is NOT in Earth's solar system. It's in >Gallifrey's solar system.
could do that.LEELA: Time loop?
DOCTOR: Yes, a time loop. All memory of a planet's been erased by a >>>>> circle of
time, making data and its records invisible. Only a Time Lord
Older and fragments of a planet.LEELA: That's very clever.
DOCTOR: That's criminal! We've been on a wild goose chase. We'd >better get
back. Let's hope we're not too far round that time loop.
LEELA: Is there anything I can do?
DOCTOR: Yes. No, no. I'll just set the coordinates and we're on our way.
So what 5th Planet in a Gallifreyan system are you talking about >>>>>>>>
The 5th planer the blew up 12 million years ago. The one the Doctor was >>>>>>> referring it.
Use above script for your defense.Does anyone around here have any basic skill in both English
comprehension and mathematics?
Add astonomy.
You can't even spell astronomy correctly and you don't even realise it, >>>>> so why should I believe you when with your level of English you wouldn't >>>>> have been able to write a dissertation.
Do you seriously think the asteroid belt is only 12 million years old? >>>>
That is not the commonly accepted theory. It's 4.6 billion years old and >>> made from objects that clumped together which were no sufficient to form >>> a planet.
Did they not teach you how old it actually is and how it formed?
Do you want to explain that to me? Explain how the solar system came >>>>> into being. I expect at least 100 words in paragraph form.
Astronony is a Grade 7 unit. Grade 7 in Canada isusually 12 to 13.
Oh, so this is secondary school astronomy. I studied it at third year
degree level.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 19/05/2026 06:00, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ugpp4$30u25$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 03:42, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.44751fcae1330f5a989ebe@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10ufadb$2j821$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 18/05/2026 14:26, The Doctor wrote:Supposed to have
[quoted text muted]
(The glow has gone, and Thea wakes up.)
DOCTOR: Come and sit down. You'll be all right.
COLBY: Embryo what?
DOCTOR: Embryo Fendahleen. A creature from my own mythology.
perished when the fifth planet broke up. At least, so they said.
Gallyfreyan mythology, therefore the 5th planet in the system of
Gallifrey. Basic comprehension really.
[quoted text muted]
[Tardis]
(In flight.)
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles
out and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
The 5th planet is 107,000,000 miles out from the sun in the system of >>>>>> Gallifrey.
Mars on the other hand is the 4th planet in the Earth's solar system and >>>>>> is 142 million miles out from the sun.
Now answer this question, how can a 5th planet be closer than a 4th >>>>>> planet in the same solar system?
The answer is that there are NOT in the same solar system. The planet >>>>>> the Fendahl came from was the 5 planet in the solar system of GALLIFREY! >>>>>>
That's a good case. I concede the point.
I don't. The Doctor was travelling 12 000 000 years back in time
107 000 000 miles from Earth.
No he wast. He was inside the TARDIS studying Time Lord records dating
back 12 million years into the history of his own solar system and got
angry at the Time Lords trying to erase the history of their 5th planet
by placing it inside a time loop.
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles out
and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
LEELA: Do you think this thing, the Fendahl, comes from the fifth planet?
DOCTOR: Well, it came from it a long time ago,
before your species evolved on Earth.
LEELA: How did it travel?
DOCTOR: What?
LEELA: Well, you said there's only one. It could not build a spacecraft.
How did it get to Earth?
DOCTOR: Well, it. Well, it probably used that enormous stockpile
of energy to project itself across space.
LEELA: Oh, you mean the way lightning travels.
DOCTOR: No. Yes, well, something like that. Humans speak of astral projection,
travelling psychically to different planets. That could be a race memory.
LEELA: Race memory?
And your point is what? That you know almost nothing about astronomy and >have virtually no ability whatsoever in English comprehension?
It's already been explained to you that the Doctor is referring to his
own solar system and the script is explicit in that.
Book yourself an--
adult education course and learn English Language.
As for the angry, he should be grateful the
Time Lords are protecting the universe.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 19/05/2026 05:49, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ugo6m$30ig4$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 03:45, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:00, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 3:34 am, The True Doctor wrote:No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sun in >>>>> Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any sun, >>>>> ie. a star orbited by planets.
On 16/05/2026 05:02, The Doctor wrote:
This is a classic!
Sorry but the information from ChatGPT and Google Gamini are not as >>>>>>>> accurate as view it.
What you have written is not a review. It's a series of notes.
AS USUAL for the asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their >>>>>> joy of child sexual molestation cleanup)!
Where is your analysis?
Wanda as Miss Ransome. Yes she is talented and should have been the >>>>>>>> Doctor's companion with Jamie instead of Victoria Waterfield.
The Scientists - A great misguised lot trying to see on the
evolution of mankind.
They open up a fissure in space - Time and the Doctor to the Rescue >>>>>>>> with Leela.
Note that the Fissure did get the attention of the Doctor.
also, IotF was set in 1984 Fetchborough.
Horro Claasic indeed.
The Doctor being scared off by a legend of the Fendahl.
The 5th Planet that become the asteroid belt. Hmm! Interesting >>>>>>>> concept.
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same >>>>>>> system as Gallifry and the Time Lords placed it in a time loop so >>>>>>> even if it formed an asteroid belt 12 million years ago it's isn't >>>>>>> the one in our Solar System which is 4.6 billion years old and it >>>>>>> wouldn't be possible to observe it in Gallyfrey's solar system
A Very minor nit-pick .... We live in THE Solar System because the >>>>>> Ancient Greeks (or whomever) named Our Star 'Sol'. Gallyfreyian's might >>>>>
have named they star 'SOL', but I doubt it so they don't live in a Solar >>>>>> System . Stellar System, sure, but not the Solar System.
The terms solar system and star system (stellar system) are
interchangeable and hardly anyone uses the term stellar system anyway. >>>>>
The Sun is a star.
Oh really? I thought it was a giant torch carried in Helios' chariot
across the sky.
What exactly is the point that you are trying to make Mr. AI chat bot?
The point about Sol.
Which is? Were you in remedial class at school?
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 18/05/2026 22:51, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sun in
Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any sun,
ie. a star orbited by planets.
Many use Sol for our star's name, Terra for our planet's name, and Luna
for our moon's name.
You would if you're Italian. In other languages they have different names.
Capitalization matters. A solar system isn't> necessarily the Solarsystem... but most people would probably say "star
system" for others.
<<AI Overview solar system/ˈsəʊlə ˌsɪstɪm/
A solar system is a star and all the celestial objects that are bound to
it by gravity. This includes planets, dwarf planets, moons, asteroids, >comets, and dust, all orbiting the central star.
When capitalized, the Solar System specifically refers to our own cosmic >neighborhood—the Sun and everything that orbits it.>>
The script has it in lower case, as does the Target novelisation.
Therefore, it isn't reoffering to our own cosmic neighbourhood, it's >referring to an alien one, that of Gallifrey.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 19/05/2026 05:51, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ugoti$30okn$1@dont-email.me>,same system
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 03:41, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ufide$2lvag$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 14:09, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ueie3$2bnu8$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 17/05/2026 20:56, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ud36c$1tcfo$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 17/05/2026 19:08, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the
carry outas Gallifry
Are you sure? Where is that said?
It's said when the Doctor and Leela head back to the TARDIS to
Time Lordssome investigations because the Fendahl was the stuff of Time Lord >>>>>>>>> nightmares. It was the 5th planet in the Gallifrey's system which blew
up 12 million years ago and sent the skull flying off to Earth where it
was discovered in Africa. Then the Doctor discovered that the
Gallifrey is 680put the planet in a time loop and kept it all hushed up, so he slammed
the data cards on the TARDIS console in disgust. Therefore this >>>>>>>>> precludes it forming any kind of asteroid belt anywhere since the Time
Lords did not want any fragments of the planet to escape and carry the
Fendahl away with them. But they obviously missed one.
Assuming it was going at 17.0 km/s the same speed as Voyager 1 it would
have travelled 680 light years to get to Earth, meaning
light years away which sounds reasonable.
I know you were paying close attention, but all the rest of us took it
the other way, and online sources also agree that it was Sol's fifth >>>>>>>>>> planet.
The asteroid belt in the Solar System is 4.6 billion years old. The >>>>>>>>> Fendahl's skull was only 12 million years old. That's an astronomical >>>>>>>>> difference. You should not rely on sources generated by AI or AI >>>>>>>>> chatbots like Yads. There's no mention of any asteroid belt in >either to
televised episodes or the Target novelisation which I own.
That how can the Fendahl wpid out life on Mars?
It didn't. The Ice Warriors are still there.
After the Fendahl wiped out the native life.
The native life were the Ice Warriors and they didn't evolve in the last >>>>> 12 million years. Did they not teach you biology and evolution at
school? Oh, no, wait... You think humans have only existed for 6000
years and they were created by God rather than having evolved from
primates. Are you sure you studied astronomy? Did they not teach you >>>>> about the big bang, inflation, the Hubble Constant and the expansion of >>>>> the universe and how it might continue? Do you want to write an essay >>>>> about the above to show me what you actually know?
Yes!
Still The Doctor did say the Fendalhl wiped out life on Mars
on its way to Earth.
No he didn't. He said it probably passed Mars along the way. Which in no >>> way contradicts what I already said since Mars is on route from
Gallifrey's solar system to Earth and the Doctor makes it explicitly
clear he is talking about his own people.
Why would the Time Lords have nightmares about a life form from a planet >>> outside of their solar system? Why would it be in their mythology? Why
would they try to erase it's existence? It's their 5th planet not ours.
From the script
Answer my questions. Is English your first language? What language is?
COLBY: So when the Time Lords acted, it was too late.So what? What is your point?
The Fendahl had already come here.
DOCTOR: Yes, probably taking in Mars on it's way through.
COLBY: Then it got itself buried, but not killed.
DOCTOR: The Fendahl is death. How do you kill death? No, what happened was >> this. The energy amassed by the Fendahl was stored in the skull and dissipated
slowly as a biological transmutation field. Now, any appropriate lifeform that
came within the field was altered so that it ultimately evolved into something
suitable for the Fendahl to use.
COLBY: Are you saying that skull created man?
DOCTOR: No, I'm saying it may have effected his evolution.
And then there is Scaroth the Jaggeroth.
Why am I talking to a pirmative AI chat both from the 1980s.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Verily, in article <10ugpko$30u25$1@dont-email.me>, did >agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 19/05/2026 03:40, The Doctor wrote:
Did you pass English Language?
Yes Gallifreyan mythology.
You passed Gallifeyan mythology? I don't remember that being in the
English syllabus.
I wish I'd gone to that school.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
Verily, in article <10ugpko$30u25$1@dont-email.me>, did >agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
At a guess about the same distance as Earth is from the sun. Somewhere
inside the habitable zone, roughly between the distance of the orbits of
Venus and Mars for a main sequence star the size of the sun.
Do we know that Gallifrey's star is a yellow dwarf? I haven't seen that >information anywhere.
I'm trying to think of what the sun looks like on Gallifrey, when we've >visited the Gallifreyan outdoors. Of course, those scenes have to be
shot in Earth's outdoors, and we couldn't expect them to build an
artificial sun with that era's budgets.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
Verily, in article <10ugqig$91l$5@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did >doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Then
how come from the script
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles out
and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
Start point Earth.
I've poked at this a little more. Most external sources (e.g., The >Discontinuity Guide) think this was the Solar System.
Modern astronomers no longer believe that the Asteroid Belt is the
remains of a single body, but it was a popular theory when Image of the >Fendahl was written.
The only real reason to think that the Fendahl came from Gallifrey's
system is the reference to Gallifreyan mythology and specifically to
using the Fendahl to frighten children. The Time Lords travel through
time and space so easily that their culture could include components
from anywhere and anywhen.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
Verily, in article <10ugurl$322sq$1@dont-email.me>, did >agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
It's already been explained to you that the Doctor is referring to his
own solar system and the script is explicit in that.
It isn't explicit. It's implied by the line about Gallifreyan folklore,
but it's never said explicitly.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
Verily, in article <10ugvhr$32813$1@dont-email.me>, did >agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 18/05/2026 22:51, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sun in
Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any sun,
ie. a star orbited by planets.
Many use Sol for our star's name, Terra for our planet's name, and Luna
for our moon's name.
You would if you're Italian. In other languages they have different names.
Haven't you seen SF writers refer to Sol and Terra and Luna while
writing in English? I have, and it's pretty common.
It's from Latin, not modern Italian.
--<<AI Overview solar system/'s??l? ?s?st?m/
A solar system is a star and all the celestial objects that are bound to
it by gravity. This includes planets, dwarf planets, moons, asteroids,
comets, and dust, all orbiting the central star.
When capitalized, the Solar System specifically refers to our own cosmic
neighborhood?the Sun and everything that orbits it.>>
The script has it in lower case, as does the Target novelisation.
Therefore, it isn't reoffering to our own cosmic neighbourhood, it's
referring to an alien one, that of Gallifrey.
You're assuming the writers and editor understood the capitalization and
its meaning. Unfortunately, that's not a safe assumption.
--
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
Verily, in article <MPG.447603b711858e46989ec2@news.eternal-
september.org>, did thetruemelissa@gmail.com deliver unto us this
message:
Verily, in article <10ugpko$30u25$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
At a guess about the same distance as Earth is from the sun. Somewhere
inside the habitable zone, roughly between the distance of the orbits of >> > Venus and Mars for a main sequence star the size of the sun.
Do we know that Gallifrey's star is a yellow dwarf? I haven't seen that
information anywhere.
I'm trying to think of what the sun looks like on Gallifrey, when we've
visited the Gallifreyan outdoors. Of course, those scenes have to be
shot in Earth's outdoors, and we couldn't expect them to build an
artificial sun with that era's budgets.
Wait wait waaaaaaaait a minute. Gallifrey's sun is a binary pair, isn't
it?
https://tardis.fandom.com/wiki/Gallifrey#Star_system
Gallifrey probably orbits the larger red one.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
On 19/05/2026 1:26 am, The True Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
Did anyone here apart from me pass their O-Level English Language andNot me!! Year Eleven Maths and English, sure, and I think I even passed
O-Level Mathematics (or equivalent) exams with decent grades?
Year Twelve English.
I've got no idea how Your O-Levels (Ordinary-Levels, I think) compares
to our Years Eleven and Twelve..
----
Daniel70
On 19/05/2026 12:40 pm, The Doctor wrote:--
In article <10ufhtl$2lqjh$1@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor
<agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 17:50, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ufadb$2j821$1@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor
<agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 14:26, The Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
It's explicit from what the Doctor said. There is no otherGallyfreyan mythology, therefore the 5th planet in the systemWhere do you imply that?
of Gallifrey. Basic comprehension really.
possible interpretation. He's a Time Lord from the planet Gallifrey
referring to his own Gallifreyan mythology, therefore his own fifth
planet.
Did you pass English Language?
Yes Gallifreyan mythology.
Galaxy not determined until
COLBY: A creature from mythology? Do you know what you're
talking about? DOCTOR: Well, you saw it. If it survived
twelve million years, it's energy reserves must be enormous.
COLBY: Twelve million? Why did you say twelve million?
DOCTOR: What? Well, about twelve million. That's when the
fifth planet broke up. There are four thousand million people
here on your planet, and if I'm right, within a year there'll
be just one left alive. Just one. ...
[Tardis]
(In flight.) DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven
million miles out and twelve million years back, so we've no
time to lose.
The 5th planet is 107,000,000 miles out from the sun in the
system of Gallifrey.
How far is Gallifrey from its star?
Mars on the other hand is the 4th planet in the Earth's solar
system and is 142 million miles out from the sun.
49 000 000 miles from Earth.
Roughly speaking at their nearest .... extending to approx 235,000,000
miles at their most distant.
What about Jupiter?
What about it, Asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy
of child sexual molestation coverup)??
And (142/93) AIs is 1.52688172043010752688 AUs.
Wacko!! The Asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy
of child sexual molestation coverup)s' computer has a calculator on it.
--
Daniel70
On 19/05/2026 8:44 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <MPG.447603b711858e46989ec2@news.eternal-From that web page ....
september.org>, did thetruemelissa@gmail.com deliver unto us this
message:
Verily, in article <10ugpko$30u25$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
At a guess about the same distance as Earth is from the sun. Somewhere >>>> inside the habitable zone, roughly between the distance of the orbits of >>>> Venus and Mars for a main sequence star the size of the sun.
Do we know that Gallifrey's star is a yellow dwarf? I haven't seen that
information anywhere.
I'm trying to think of what the sun looks like on Gallifrey, when we've
visited the Gallifreyan outdoors. Of course, those scenes have to be
shot in Earth's outdoors, and we couldn't expect them to build an
artificial sun with that era's budgets.
Wait wait waaaaaaaait a minute. Gallifrey's sun is a binary pair, isn't
it?
https://tardis.fandom.com/wiki/Gallifrey#Star_system
Gallifrey probably orbits the larger red one.
Quote
Gallifrey was in a binary star system. The second star seemed to rise in
the East in the morning, making the mountains glow, (TV: Gridlock) and
both set in the South. (PROSE: The Bloodletters) The main star was large
and golden red. (AUDIO: The Forever Trap) The Monk believed that the >Homeworld had not originally been part of a binary system, but had been >retroactively engineered into one by He-of-Many-Epithets as a precaution >during the war against the vampires: the interaction of the orbital
patterns of the two suns created a shifting "interference pattern" in
the daylight which meant that even vampires resistant to ordinary
sunlight could not walk on the Homeworld without burning. Because of
these "mad orbital mechanics", the planet had "an unconventional
day-night terminator": as the Monk put it, "the region in darkness
[shrank] like an iris and close[d] like a fist". (PROSE: The Bloodletters) >End Quote
The second star seemed to rise in the East .... and both set in the South!!
What a wacko orbit Gallifrey must have!!
And Vampires!! When have we ever heard of Vampires on Gallifrey?? Is
THAT what makes The Time Lords so different to the ordinary Gallifreyans??
----
Daniel70
Verily, in article <10uhiru$37npd$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 >@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
The second star seemed to rise in the East .... and both set in the South!! >>
What a wacko orbit Gallifrey must have!!
It didn't orbit the smaller star, so the smaller star didn't have a
straight path across the sky. Makes sense to me.
As for the vampires, check out State of Decay. Or don't, since the
rewatch parties will reach it soon.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
On 19/05/2026 7:43 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:00, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 3:34 am, The True Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same
system as Gallifry and the Time Lords placed it in a time loop so
even if it formed an asteroid belt 12 million years ago it's isn't
the one in our Solar System which is 4.6 billion years old and it
wouldn't be possible to observe it in Gallyfrey's solar system
A Very minor nit-pick .... We live in THE Solar System because the
Ancient Greeks (or whomever) named Our Star 'Sol'. Gallyfreyian's might
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sun in
Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any sun,
ie. a star orbited by planets.
If the Gallifreyans had, at some time, spoked Latin, then, Yes, they
might have called their STAR Sol and (but which one ... if they are in a >Binary Star system??), therefore, Gallifrey would be in a Solar System
.... but what would the chances of THAT having occurred be?
Long Odds, I might suggest!!
have named they star 'SOL', but I doubt it so they don't live in a Solar >>> System . Stellar System, sure, but not the Solar System.
The terms solar system and star system (stellar system) are
interchangeable and hardly anyone uses the term stellar system anyway.
"Interchangeable" .... if you don't care for ACCURACY!! (O.K., I have
been called a Pedant at times!)
----
Daniel70
On 19/05/2026 2:16 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/05/2026 03:45, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor
<agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:00, Daniel70 wrote:
<Snip>
A Very minor nit-pick .... We live in THE Solar System because
the Ancient Greeks (or whomever) named Our Star 'Sol'.
Gallyfreyian's might
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means
sun in Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies
to any sun, ie. a star orbited by planets.
have named they star 'SOL', but I doubt it so they don't live
in a Solar System . Stellar System, sure, but not the Solar
System.
The terms solar system and star system (stellar system) are
interchangeable and hardly anyone uses the term stellar system
anyway.
The Sun is a star.
Oh really? I thought it was a giant torch carried in Helios' chariot
across the sky.
Ah!! But then you would only see the 'giant torch' when you were behind
the chariot .... Or was it on the front of the chariot sort of like a >Headlight??
What exactly is the point that you are trying to make Mr. AI chat
bot?
Is he EVER trying to make a point .... or just a post to increase his
All Important Precise Post Count??
----
Daniel70
On 19/05/2026 9:59 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10uhiru$37npd$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
The second star seemed to rise in the East .... and both set in
the South!!
What a wacko orbit Gallifrey must have!!
It didn't orbit the smaller star, so the smaller star didn't have a
straight path across the sky. Makes sense to me.
The two stars would have orbited a common mid-point just as The Moon
doesn't really orbit The Earth, they both orbit a common mid-point,
which I think is just below The Earth's crust but nowhere near the
middle of The Earth.
As for the vampires, check out State of Decay. Or don't, since theAh!! So there ARE Vampires on Gallifrey, are there?
rewatch parties will reach it soon.
----
Daniel70
Verily, in article <10uhl8j$38fs3$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 >@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 19/05/2026 9:59 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10uhiru$37npd$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
The second star seemed to rise in the East .... and both set in
the South!!
What a wacko orbit Gallifrey must have!!
It didn't orbit the smaller star, so the smaller star didn't have a
straight path across the sky. Makes sense to me.
The two stars would have orbited a common mid-point just as The Moon
doesn't really orbit The Earth, they both orbit a common mid-point,
which I think is just below The Earth's crust but nowhere near the
middle of The Earth.
The stars are orbiting a common barycenter, but what about Gallifrey? It >could be orbiting the pair or directly orbiting the larger one.
Gallifrey's system is a pretty dangerous place -- Morbius on the third >planet, crazy Time Lords on the fourth, and (maybe) these archonic
creatures on the fifth.
As for the vampires, check out State of Decay. Or don't, since theAh!! So there ARE Vampires on Gallifrey, are there?
rewatch parties will reach it soon.
They're not on Gallifrey. If you haven't seen it, wait and be surprised.
:-)
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
In article <10ugvnl$32813$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 05:51, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ugoti$30okn$1@dont-email.me>,same system
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 03:41, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ufide$2lvag$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 14:09, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ueie3$2bnu8$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 17/05/2026 20:56, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ud36c$1tcfo$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 17/05/2026 19:08, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message: >>>>>>>>>>>> What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the
carry outas Gallifry
Are you sure? Where is that said?
It's said when the Doctor and Leela head back to the TARDIS to
Time Lordssome investigations because the Fendahl was the stuff of Time Lord >>>>>>>>>> nightmares. It was the 5th planet in the Gallifrey's system which blew
up 12 million years ago and sent the skull flying off to Earth where it
was discovered in Africa. Then the Doctor discovered that the
Gallifrey is 680put the planet in a time loop and kept it all hushed up, so he slammed
the data cards on the TARDIS console in disgust. Therefore this >>>>>>>>>> precludes it forming any kind of asteroid belt anywhere since the Time
Lords did not want any fragments of the planet to escape and carry the
Fendahl away with them. But they obviously missed one.
Assuming it was going at 17.0 km/s the same speed as Voyager 1 it would
have travelled 680 light years to get to Earth, meaning
either tolight years away which sounds reasonable.
I know you were paying close attention, but all the rest of us took it
the other way, and online sources also agree that it was Sol's fifth
planet.
The asteroid belt in the Solar System is 4.6 billion years old. The >>>>>>>>>> Fendahl's skull was only 12 million years old. That's an astronomical
difference. You should not rely on sources generated by AI or AI >>>>>>>>>> chatbots like Yads. There's no mention of any asteroid belt in
televised episodes or the Target novelisation which I own. >>>>>>>>>>
That how can the Fendahl wpid out life on Mars?
It didn't. The Ice Warriors are still there.
After the Fendahl wiped out the native life.
The native life were the Ice Warriors and they didn't evolve in the last >>>>>> 12 million years. Did they not teach you biology and evolution at
school? Oh, no, wait... You think humans have only existed for 6000 >>>>>> years and they were created by God rather than having evolved from >>>>>> primates. Are you sure you studied astronomy? Did they not teach you >>>>>> about the big bang, inflation, the Hubble Constant and the expansion of >>>>>> the universe and how it might continue? Do you want to write an essay >>>>>> about the above to show me what you actually know?
Yes!
Still The Doctor did say the Fendalhl wiped out life on Mars
on its way to Earth.
No he didn't. He said it probably passed Mars along the way. Which in no >>>> way contradicts what I already said since Mars is on route from
Gallifrey's solar system to Earth and the Doctor makes it explicitly
clear he is talking about his own people.
Why would the Time Lords have nightmares about a life form from a planet >>>> outside of their solar system? Why would it be in their mythology? Why >>>> would they try to erase it's existence? It's their 5th planet not ours. >>>>
From the script
Answer my questions. Is English your first language? What language is?
British English, then Canadian English the Quebec French .
Est 1988 in Rimouski.
COLBY: So when the Time Lords acted, it was too late.So what? What is your point?
The Fendahl had already come here.
DOCTOR: Yes, probably taking in Mars on it's way through.
COLBY: Then it got itself buried, but not killed.
DOCTOR: The Fendahl is death. How do you kill death? No, what happened was >>> this. The energy amassed by the Fendahl was stored in the skull and dissipated
slowly as a biological transmutation field. Now, any appropriate lifeform that
came within the field was altered so that it ultimately evolved into something
suitable for the Fendahl to use.
COLBY: Are you saying that skull created man?
DOCTOR: No, I'm saying it may have effected his evolution.
And then there is Scaroth the Jaggeroth.
Why am I talking to a pirmative AI chat both from the 1980s.
REcall how DW see Evolution from Earth's Point of views.
In article <10uguiv$320uo$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 05:56, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ugpko$30u25$1@dont-email.me>,longer than
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 03:40, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ufhtl$2lqjh$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 17:50, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ufadb$2j821$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 14:26, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10uevgf$2flbd$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:56, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 8:21 pm, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 4:59 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 17/05/2026 19:08, The True Melissa wrote:No it doesn't!!
Verily, in article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>, did >>>>>>>>>>>>>> agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same
system
as Gallifry
Are you sure? Where is that said?
It's said when the Doctor and Leela head back to the TARDIS to carry
out some investigations because the Fendahl was the stuff of Time >>>>>>>>>>>>> Lord nightmares. It was the 5th planet in the Gallifrey's system >>>>>>>>>>>>> which blew up 12 million years ago and sent the skull flying off to
Earth where it was discovered in Africa. Then the Doctor discovered
that the Time Lords put the planet in a time loop and kept it all >>>>>>>>>>>>> hushed up, so he slammed the data cards on the TARDIS console in >>>>>>>>>>>>> disgust. Therefore this precludes it forming any kind of asteroid >>>>>>>>>>>>> belt anywhere since the Time Lords did not want any fragments of the
planet to escape and carry the Fendahl away with them. But they >>>>>>>>>>>>> obviously missed one.
Assuming it was going at 17.0 km/s the same speed as Voyager 1 it >>>>>>>>>>>>> would have travelled 680 light years to get to Earth, meaning >>>>>>>>>>>>> Gallifrey is 680 light years away which sounds reasonable. >>>>>>>>>>>>
Sorry!! WHAT?? If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle
was travelling at 17.0 km/s, it would take a HELL of a lot
travelling atof time!!)680 years to reach Earth (like about 17,500 times that length
Where the hell did I say it would take it 680 years?
I said it took it 12 million years to reach Earth. Or rather the Doctor
said it took it that long.
If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle was
vehicle wasthe speed of light (approx 300,000 Km/sec), it would take approx ONE
year to get here.
Error!! Error!! If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a
would taketravelling at the speed of light (approx 300,000 Km/sec), it
it's energySupposed to haveapprox 680 year to get here.
Now multiply that by 300,000/17 ie. 17,647.05882352941 and what do you
get? 12,000,000 years at 1/17,647.05882352941 of the speed of light. >>>>>>>>>>
All right some context coming up
DOCTOR: They look like embryo Fendahleen to me.
(The glow has gone, and Thea wakes up.)
DOCTOR: Come and sit down. You'll be all right.
COLBY: Embryo what?
DOCTOR: Embryo Fendahleen. A creature from my own mythology.
perished when the fifth planet broke up. At least, so they said. >>>>>>>>Gallyfreyan mythology, therefore the 5th planet in the system of >>>>>>>> Gallifrey. Basic comprehension really.
Where do you imply that?
It's explicit from what the Doctor said. There is no other possible >>>>>> interpretation. He's a Time Lord from the planet Gallifrey referring to >>>>>> his own Gallifreyan mythology, therefore his own fifth planet.
Did you pass English Language?
Yes Gallifreyan mythology.
You passed Gallifeyan mythology? I don't remember that being in the
English syllabus.
:-)
Galaxy not determined until
COLBY: A creature from mythology? Do you know what you're talking about?
DOCTOR: Well, you saw it. If it survived twelve million years,
Just one.reserves must be enormous.
COLBY: Twelve million? Why did you say twelve million?
DOCTOR: What? Well, about twelve million. That's when the fifth planet
broke up. There are four thousand million people here on your planet, >>>>>>>>> and if I'm right, within a year there'll be just one left alive.
...
[Tardis]
(In flight.)
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles >>>>>>>>> out and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
The 5th planet is 107,000,000 miles out from the sun in the system of >>>>>>>> Gallifrey.
How far is Gallifrey from its star?
At a guess about the same distance as Earth is from the sun. Somewhere >>>> inside the habitable zone, roughly between the distance of the orbits of >>>> Venus and Mars for a main sequence star the size of the sun.
Recall Gallifrey is 100x to 1000x bigger than Earth.
No it isn't. Do you think Gallifrey is bigger than the sun?
Do you recall end of Time?
Mars on the other hand is the 4th planet in the Earth's solar system and
is 142 million miles out from the sun.
49 000 000 miles from Earth.
Wrong. The Earth moves in an orbit and so does Mars. The do not orbit
equidistant from each other.
What about min and max distances then?
Min and max distances of what?
Between the 2 planets.
What about Jupiter?
And (142/93) AIs is 1.52688172043010752688 AUs.
So what? The Fendahl came from Gallifrey's solar system not ours. The
Doctor makes that abundantly clear.
Then
how come from the script
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles out
and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
Start point Earth.
Start point GALLIFREY'S SUN!
Why?
107 000 000 miles from where?
fifth planet?
Now answer this question, how can a 5th planet be closer than a 4th >>>>>>>> planet in the same solar system?
The answer is that there are NOT in the same solar system. The planet >>>>>>>> the Fendahl came from was the 5 planet in the solar system of GALLIFREY!
LEELA: Do you think this thing, the Fendahl, comes from the
DOCTOR: Well, it came from it a long time ago,
before your species evolved on Earth.
LEELA: How did it travel?
DOCTOR: What?
LEELA: Well, you said there's only one. It could not build
a spacecraft. How did it get to Earth?
DOCTOR: Well, it. Well, it probably used that enormous stockpile >>>>>>>>> of energy to project itself across space.
LEELA: Oh, you mean the way lightning travels.
DOCTOR: No. Yes, well, something like that. Humans speak
of astral projection, travelling psychically to different planets. >>>>>>>>> That could be a race memory.
LEELA: Race memory?
DOCTOR: Yes. You see, sometimes people dream they've been
to other places. It's, er, deja vu. No?
(On Earth, Tyler watches a white van come up the gravel drive to >>>>>>>>> the main house. Ted Moss and three other men get out.
Leela is sleeping on the console room floor. She wakes and has >>>>>>>>> her knife ready when the Doctor enters.)
DOCTOR: No, no, no. Put it away, put it away. It's a good thing >>>>>>>>> your tribe never developed guns. They'd have woken with a start >>>>>>>>> one morning and wiped themselves out.
LEELA: There was something chasing me. I, I couldn't move.
Just a dream, I suppose.
(The Doctor breaks the three plastic cards he was carrying.) >>>>>>>>> LEELA: Hey, what's wrong?
DOCTOR: I've been checking the old data banks.
There's no record at all of a fifth planet.
LEELA: Does that matter?
DOCTOR: Well of course it matters! We Time Lords are a very
meticulous people. You have to be when you live as long as we do. >>>>>>>>> All information is recorded.
LEELA: Perhaps there wasn't any.
DOCTOR: What?
LEELA: Information.
DOCTOR: What?
(He switches on the scanner. The view is green and swirling.) >>>>>>>>> DOCTOR: Of course. That's why there's no record of the planet. >>>>>>>>> LEELA: Why?
DOCTOR: That impression's produced by a time loop.
(Lights are flashing red and yellow on the console.)
Do you see any green swirling haze like that anywhere between Mars and
Jupiter in the Earth's solar system? NO! There isn't any.
So? IT was seen from inside the TARDIS.
That's because the time loop is NOT in Earth's solar system. It's in
Gallifrey's solar system.
better getcould do that.LEELA: Time loop?
DOCTOR: Yes, a time loop. All memory of a planet's been erased by a >>>>>> circle of
time, making data and its records invisible. Only a Time Lord
LEELA: That's very clever.
DOCTOR: That's criminal! We've been on a wild goose chase. We'd
Older and fragments of a planet.back. Let's hope we're not too far round that time loop.
LEELA: Is there anything I can do?
DOCTOR: Yes. No, no. I'll just set the coordinates and we're on our way.
So what 5th Planet in a Gallifreyan system are you talking about >>>>>>>>>
The 5th planer the blew up 12 million years ago. The one the Doctor was
referring it.
Use above script for your defense.Does anyone around here have any basic skill in both English
comprehension and mathematics?
Add astonomy.
You can't even spell astronomy correctly and you don't even realise it, >>>>>> so why should I believe you when with your level of English you wouldn't >>>>>> have been able to write a dissertation.
Do you seriously think the asteroid belt is only 12 million years old? >>>>>
That is not the commonly accepted theory. It's 4.6 billion years old and >>>> made from objects that clumped together which were no sufficient to form >>>> a planet.
Did they not teach you how old it actually is and how it formed?
Do you want to explain that to me? Explain how the solar system came >>>>>> into being. I expect at least 100 words in paragraph form.
Astronony is a Grade 7 unit. Grade 7 in Canada isusually 12 to 13.
Oh, so this is secondary school astronomy. I studied it at third year
degree level.
It is a start point.
In article <10uhl8j$38fs3$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The two stars would have orbited a common mid-point just as The Moon >doesn't really orbit The Earth, they both orbit a common mid-point,
which I think is just below The Earth's crust but nowhere near the
middle of The Earth.
What about the 4 PRotoStars in the Solar System?
On 19/05/2026 15:02, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ugvnl$32813$2@dont-email.me>,which blew
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 05:51, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ugoti$30okn$1@dont-email.me>,same system
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 03:41, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ufide$2lvag$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 14:09, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ueie3$2bnu8$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 17/05/2026 20:56, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ud36c$1tcfo$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 17/05/2026 19:08, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>, did >>>>>>>>>>>> agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message: >>>>>>>>>>>>> What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the
carry outas Gallifry
Are you sure? Where is that said?
It's said when the Doctor and Leela head back to the TARDIS to
some investigations because the Fendahl was the stuff of Time Lord >>>>>>>>>>> nightmares. It was the 5th planet in the Gallifrey's system
Earth where itup 12 million years ago and sent the skull flying off to
he slammedTime Lordswas discovered in Africa. Then the Doctor discovered that the
put the planet in a time loop and kept it all hushed up, so
the Timethe data cards on the TARDIS console in disgust. Therefore this >>>>>>>>>>> precludes it forming any kind of asteroid belt anywhere since
carry theLords did not want any fragments of the planet to escape and
1 it wouldFendahl away with them. But they obviously missed one.
Assuming it was going at 17.0 km/s the same speed as Voyager
us took itGallifrey is 680have travelled 680 light years to get to Earth, meaning
light years away which sounds reasonable.
I know you were paying close attention, but all the rest of
either tothe other way, and online sources also agree that it was Sol's fifth
planet.
The asteroid belt in the Solar System is 4.6 billion years old. The >>>>>>>>>>> Fendahl's skull was only 12 million years old. That's an astronomical
difference. You should not rely on sources generated by AI or AI >>>>>>>>>>> chatbots like Yads. There's no mention of any asteroid belt in
televised episodes or the Target novelisation which I own. >>>>>>>>>>>
That how can the Fendahl wpid out life on Mars?
It didn't. The Ice Warriors are still there.
After the Fendahl wiped out the native life.
The native life were the Ice Warriors and they didn't evolve in the last
12 million years. Did they not teach you biology and evolution at >>>>>>> school? Oh, no, wait... You think humans have only existed for 6000 >>>>>>> years and they were created by God rather than having evolved from >>>>>>> primates. Are you sure you studied astronomy? Did they not teach you >>>>>>> about the big bang, inflation, the Hubble Constant and the expansion of >>>>>>> the universe and how it might continue? Do you want to write an essay >>>>>>> about the above to show me what you actually know?
Yes!
Still The Doctor did say the Fendalhl wiped out life on Mars
on its way to Earth.
No he didn't. He said it probably passed Mars along the way. Which in no >>>>> way contradicts what I already said since Mars is on route from
Gallifrey's solar system to Earth and the Doctor makes it explicitly >>>>> clear he is talking about his own people.
Why would the Time Lords have nightmares about a life form from a planet >>>>> outside of their solar system? Why would it be in their mythology? Why >>>>> would they try to erase it's existence? It's their 5th planet not ours. >>>>>
From the script
Answer my questions. Is English your first language? What language is?
British English, then Canadian English the Quebec French .
Est 1988 in Rimouski.
What does that mean? That you've only spoken English since 1988? It figures.
lifeform that
COLBY: So when the Time Lords acted, it was too late.
The Fendahl had already come here.
DOCTOR: Yes, probably taking in Mars on it's way through.
COLBY: Then it got itself buried, but not killed.
DOCTOR: The Fendahl is death. How do you kill death? No, what happened was >>>> this. The energy amassed by the Fendahl was stored in the skull and >dissipated
slowly as a biological transmutation field. Now, any appropriate
And your point is what? That you're totally incapable of explainingcame within the field was altered so that it ultimately evolved into >somethingSo what? What is your point?
suitable for the Fendahl to use.
COLBY: Are you saying that skull created man?
DOCTOR: No, I'm saying it may have effected his evolution.
And then there is Scaroth the Jaggeroth.
Why am I talking to a pirmative AI chat both from the 1980s.
REcall how DW see Evolution from Earth's Point of views.
anything to anyone...?
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 19/05/2026 14:44, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10uguiv$320uo$1@dont-email.me>,TARDIS to carry
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 05:56, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ugpko$30u25$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 03:40, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ufhtl$2lqjh$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 17:50, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ufadb$2j821$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 14:26, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10uevgf$2flbd$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:56, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 8:21 pm, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 4:59 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 17/05/2026 19:08, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>, did >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same
system
as Gallifry
Are you sure? Where is that said?
It's said when the Doctor and Leela head back to the
flying off toout some investigations because the Fendahl was the stuff of Time
Lord nightmares. It was the 5th planet in the Gallifrey's system >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which blew up 12 million years ago and sent the skull
fragments of theEarth where it was discovered in Africa. Then the Doctor >discovered
that the Time Lords put the planet in a time loop and kept it all
hushed up, so he slammed the data cards on the TARDIS console in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> disgust. Therefore this precludes it forming any kind of asteroid
belt anywhere since the Time Lords did not want any
the Doctorlonger thanplanet to escape and carry the Fendahl away with them. But they >>>>>>>>>>>>>> obviously missed one.No it doesn't!!
Assuming it was going at 17.0 km/s the same speed as Voyager 1 it
would have travelled 680 light years to get to Earth, meaning >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gallifrey is 680 light years away which sounds reasonable. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sorry!! WHAT?? If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle
was travelling at 17.0 km/s, it would take a HELL of a lot
680 years to reach Earth (like about 17,500 times that length >>>>> of time!!)
Where the hell did I say it would take it 680 years?
I said it took it 12 million years to reach Earth. Or rather
approx ONEtravelling atsaid it took it that long.
If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a vehicle was
the speed of light (approx 300,000 Km/sec), it would take
what do youvehicle wasyear to get here.
Error!! Error!! If Gallifrey *IS* 680 Light Years away and a
would taketravelling at the speed of light (approx 300,000 Km/sec), it
approx 680 year to get here.
Now multiply that by 300,000/17 ie. 17,647.05882352941 and
talking about?Supposed to haveget? 12,000,000 years at 1/17,647.05882352941 of the speed of light.
All right some context coming up
DOCTOR: They look like embryo Fendahleen to me.
(The glow has gone, and Thea wakes up.)
DOCTOR: Come and sit down. You'll be all right.
COLBY: Embryo what?
DOCTOR: Embryo Fendahleen. A creature from my own mythology.
perished when the fifth planet broke up. At least, so they said. >>>>>>>>>Gallyfreyan mythology, therefore the 5th planet in the system of >>>>>>>>> Gallifrey. Basic comprehension really.
Where do you imply that?
It's explicit from what the Doctor said. There is no other possible >>>>>>> interpretation. He's a Time Lord from the planet Gallifrey referring to >>>>>>> his own Gallifreyan mythology, therefore his own fifth planet.
Did you pass English Language?
Yes Gallifreyan mythology.
You passed Gallifeyan mythology? I don't remember that being in the
English syllabus.
:-)
Galaxy not determined until
COLBY: A creature from mythology? Do you know what you're
it's energyDOCTOR: Well, you saw it. If it survived twelve million years,
Just one.reserves must be enormous.
COLBY: Twelve million? Why did you say twelve million?
DOCTOR: What? Well, about twelve million. That's when the fifth planet
broke up. There are four thousand million people here on your planet,
and if I'm right, within a year there'll be just one left alive.
The 5th planet is 107,000,000 miles out from the sun in the system of >>>>>>>>> Gallifrey.
...
[Tardis]
(In flight.)
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles >>>>>>>>>> out and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose. >>>>>>>>>
How far is Gallifrey from its star?
At a guess about the same distance as Earth is from the sun. Somewhere >>>>> inside the habitable zone, roughly between the distance of the orbits of >>>>> Venus and Mars for a main sequence star the size of the sun.
Recall Gallifrey is 100x to 1000x bigger than Earth.
No it isn't. Do you think Gallifrey is bigger than the sun?
Do you recall end of Time?
No. Why do you think that Gallifrey is bigger than the sun?
system and
Mars on the other hand is the 4th planet in the Earth's solar
is 142 million miles out from the sun.
49 000 000 miles from Earth.
Wrong. The Earth moves in an orbit and so does Mars. The do not orbit >>>>> equidistant from each other.
What about min and max distances then?
Min and max distances of what?
Between the 2 planets.
And your point is what?
What about Jupiter?
And (142/93) AIs is 1.52688172043010752688 AUs.
So what? The Fendahl came from Gallifrey's solar system not ours. The >>>>> Doctor makes that abundantly clear.
Then
how come from the script
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles out
and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
Start point Earth.
Start point GALLIFREY'S SUN!
Why?
107 000 000 miles from where?
Did you understand what I told you earlier? How can a 5th planet be
closer to the sun than the 4th planet Mars? The Doctor isn't referring
to Earth's solar system, he's referring to Gallifrey's.
fifth planet?
Now answer this question, how can a 5th planet be closer than a 4th >>>>>>>>> planet in the same solar system?
The answer is that there are NOT in the same solar system. The planet >>>>>>>>> the Fendahl came from was the 5 planet in the solar system of >GALLIFREY!
LEELA: Do you think this thing, the Fendahl, comes from the
DOCTOR: Well, it came from it a long time ago,
before your species evolved on Earth.
LEELA: How did it travel?
DOCTOR: What?
LEELA: Well, you said there's only one. It could not build >>>>>>>>>> a spacecraft. How did it get to Earth?
DOCTOR: Well, it. Well, it probably used that enormous stockpile >>>>>>>>>> of energy to project itself across space.
LEELA: Oh, you mean the way lightning travels.
DOCTOR: No. Yes, well, something like that. Humans speak
of astral projection, travelling psychically to different planets. >>>>>>>>>> That could be a race memory.
LEELA: Race memory?
DOCTOR: Yes. You see, sometimes people dream they've been
to other places. It's, er, deja vu. No?
(On Earth, Tyler watches a white van come up the gravel drive to >>>>>>>>>> the main house. Ted Moss and three other men get out.
Leela is sleeping on the console room floor. She wakes and has >>>>>>>>>> her knife ready when the Doctor enters.)
DOCTOR: No, no, no. Put it away, put it away. It's a good thing >>>>>>>>>> your tribe never developed guns. They'd have woken with a start >>>>>>>>>> one morning and wiped themselves out.
LEELA: There was something chasing me. I, I couldn't move. >>>>>>>>>> Just a dream, I suppose.
(The Doctor breaks the three plastic cards he was carrying.) >>>>>>>>>> LEELA: Hey, what's wrong?
DOCTOR: I've been checking the old data banks.
There's no record at all of a fifth planet.
LEELA: Does that matter?
DOCTOR: Well of course it matters! We Time Lords are a very >>>>>>>>>> meticulous people. You have to be when you live as long as we do. >>>>>>>>>> All information is recorded.
LEELA: Perhaps there wasn't any.
DOCTOR: What?
LEELA: Information.
DOCTOR: What?
(He switches on the scanner. The view is green and swirling.) >>>>>>>>>> DOCTOR: Of course. That's why there's no record of the planet. >>>>>>>>>> LEELA: Why?
DOCTOR: That impression's produced by a time loop.
(Lights are flashing red and yellow on the console.)
Do you see any green swirling haze like that anywhere between Mars and
Jupiter in the Earth's solar system? NO! There isn't any.
So? IT was seen from inside the TARDIS.
What difference does that make? There's no green haze between Mars and >Jupiter.
--on our way.That's because the time loop is NOT in Earth's solar system. It's in
Gallifrey's solar system.
better getcould do that.LEELA: Time loop?
DOCTOR: Yes, a time loop. All memory of a planet's been erased by a >>>>>>> circle of
time, making data and its records invisible. Only a Time Lord
LEELA: That's very clever.
DOCTOR: That's criminal! We've been on a wild goose chase. We'd
back. Let's hope we're not too far round that time loop.
LEELA: Is there anything I can do?
DOCTOR: Yes. No, no. I'll just set the coordinates and we're
Older and fragments of a planet.
So what 5th Planet in a Gallifreyan system are you talking about >>>>>>>>>>
The 5th planer the blew up 12 million years ago. The one the Doctor was
referring it.
Use above script for your defense.Does anyone around here have any basic skill in both English >>>>>>>>> comprehension and mathematics?
Add astonomy.
You can't even spell astronomy correctly and you don't even realise it, >>>>>>> so why should I believe you when with your level of English you wouldn't
have been able to write a dissertation.
Do you seriously think the asteroid belt is only 12 million years old? >>>>>>
That is not the commonly accepted theory. It's 4.6 billion years old and >>>>> made from objects that clumped together which were no sufficient to form >>>>> a planet.
Did they not teach you how old it actually is and how it formed? >>>>>>>
Do you want to explain that to me? Explain how the solar system came >>>>>>> into being. I expect at least 100 words in paragraph form.
Astronony is a Grade 7 unit. Grade 7 in Canada isusually 12 to 13. >>>>>>
Oh, so this is secondary school astronomy. I studied it at third year >>>>> degree level.
It is a start point.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Verily, in article <10uhrnm$27h4$16@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did >doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10uhl8j$38fs3$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The two stars would have orbited a common mid-point just as The Moon
doesn't really orbit The Earth, they both orbit a common mid-point,
which I think is just below The Earth's crust but nowhere near the
middle of The Earth.
If the barycenter is inside Earth, then as I understand it, the moon
does orbit Earth. It's when the barycenter is outside that we say they
orbit each other. Pluton and Charon are a classic example, with the >barycenter inside neither.
I love how we talk about all kinds of things in this group. I guess
that's one of the great parts about a show like Doctor Who. We can dive
deep into history, astronomy, mythology, and a whole lot of other
things.
What about the 4 PRotoStars in the Solar System?
What about them?
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
Verily, in article <10ugqig$91l$5@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Then
how come from the script
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles out
and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
Start point Earth.
I've poked at this a little more. Most external sources (e.g., The Discontinuity Guide) think this was the Solar System.
Modern astronomers no longer believe that the Asteroid Belt is the
remains of a single body, but it was a popular theory when Image of the Fendahl was written.
The only real reason to think that the Fendahl came from Gallifrey's
system is the reference to Gallifreyan mythology and specifically to
using the Fendahl to frighten children. The Time Lords travel through
time and space so easily that their culture could include componentsExcept they don't and it doesn't. That's why the Doctor left. They're
from anywhere and anywhen.
In article <10uhue1$3bhgn$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 14:44, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10uguiv$320uo$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 05:56, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ugpko$30u25$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
Gallifrey.
How far is Gallifrey from its star?
At a guess about the same distance as Earth is from the sun. Somewhere >>>>>> inside the habitable zone, roughly between the distance of the orbits of >>>>>> Venus and Mars for a main sequence star the size of the sun.
Recall Gallifrey is 100x to 1000x bigger than Earth.
No it isn't. Do you think Gallifrey is bigger than the sun?
Do you recall end of Time?
No. Why do you think that Gallifrey is bigger than the sun?
I said bigger than Earth.
system and
Mars on the other hand is the 4th planet in the Earth's solar
is 142 million miles out from the sun.
49 000 000 miles from Earth.
Wrong. The Earth moves in an orbit and so does Mars. The do not orbit >>>>>> equidistant from each other.
What about min and max distances then?
Min and max distances of what?
Between the 2 planets.
And your point is what?
Where is the starting point?
What about Jupiter?
And (142/93) AIs is 1.52688172043010752688 AUs.
So what? The Fendahl came from Gallifrey's solar system not ours. The >>>>>> Doctor makes that abundantly clear.
Then
how come from the script
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles out
and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
Start point Earth.
Start point GALLIFREY'S SUN!
Why?
107 000 000 miles from where?
Did you understand what I told you earlier? How can a 5th planet be
closer to the sun than the 4th planet Mars? The Doctor isn't referring
to Earth's solar system, he's referring to Gallifrey's.
The Starting point is Earth, not the sun.
Do you see any green swirling haze like that anywhere between Mars and >>>> Jupiter in the Earth's solar system? NO! There isn't any.
So? IT was seen from inside the TARDIS.
What difference does that make? There's no green haze between Mars and
Jupiter.
The same will be seen if anyone tries to access Axos.
I am referring to Newtonian Physics
and
that those protostars can be as powerful as our sun one day.
On 19/05/2026 11:26, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ugqig$91l$5@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Then
how come from the script
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles out
and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
Start point Earth.
I've poked at this a little more. Most external sources (e.g., The
Discontinuity Guide) think this was the Solar System.
And they are all wrong. Keith Topping is probably the source of this >mistaken belief since the early to mid 90s when The Discontinuity Guide
was published, and his sources mostly came from usenet posts. I should
be entitled to a refund of what I paid for it.
Modern astronomers no longer believe that the Asteroid Belt is the
remains of a single body, but it was a popular theory when Image of the
Fendahl was written.
It was never the popular belief even at the time of Image of the
Fendahl. The standard theory was that electrostatic forces caused
particles to come together and form larger bodies which eventually grew >large enough to be attracted together by gravity as the dominantly force >gathering around them everything in their wake until they all coalesced
and formed into planets clearing up everything in the region in which
they orbited. The asteroid belt failed to do this due to the influence
of Jupiter's gravity. This all occurred 4.6 billion years ago, not 12 >million years ago. Gravity would have brought all of the remnants of any >subsequent collision back together again.
Planets do not go spontaneously breaking themselves apart and forming >asteroid belts. There is no reference any asteroid belt in the script
and an inhabited planet wouldn't be sitting in the middle of one, which
it wasn't in any case from the distance given.
The only real reason to think that the Fendahl came from Gallifrey's
system is the reference to Gallifreyan mythology and specifically to
using the Fendahl to frighten children. The Time Lords travel through
Exactly. It's the only possible way to interpret that sentence of
dialogue and everything that came after it.
--time and space so easily that their culture could include componentsExcept they don't and it doesn't. That's why the Doctor left. They're
from anywhere and anywhen.
all completely insular. They didn't even found any colonies, so why
would something that was not inside their own solar system influence
their own mythology?
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 19/05/2026 16:32, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10uhue1$3bhgn$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 14:44, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10uguiv$320uo$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 05:56, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ugpko$30u25$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
Gallifrey.
How far is Gallifrey from its star?
At a guess about the same distance as Earth is from the sun. Somewhere >>>>>>> inside the habitable zone, roughly between the distance of the orbits of
Venus and Mars for a main sequence star the size of the sun.
Recall Gallifrey is 100x to 1000x bigger than Earth.
No it isn't. Do you think Gallifrey is bigger than the sun?
Do you recall end of Time?
No. Why do you think that Gallifrey is bigger than the sun?
I said bigger than Earth.
You said, 100x to 1000x bigger than Earth. Do you realise that that is >bigger than the sun?
system and
Mars on the other hand is the 4th planet in the Earth's solar
is 142 million miles out from the sun.
49 000 000 miles from Earth.
Wrong. The Earth moves in an orbit and so does Mars. The do not orbit >>>>>>> equidistant from each other.
What about min and max distances then?
Min and max distances of what?
Between the 2 planets.
And your point is what?
Where is the starting point?
The centre of gravity of the entire system.
What about Jupiter?
And (142/93) AIs is 1.52688172043010752688 AUs.
So what? The Fendahl came from Gallifrey's solar system not ours. The >>>>>>> Doctor makes that abundantly clear.
Then
how come from the script
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles out
and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
Start point Earth.
Start point GALLIFREY'S SUN!
Why?
107 000 000 miles from where?
Did you understand what I told you earlier? How can a 5th planet be
closer to the sun than the 4th planet Mars? The Doctor isn't referring
to Earth's solar system, he's referring to Gallifrey's.
The Starting point is Earth, not the sun.
No isn't. Do you understand how orbits work? Did you pass English
Language comprehension?
The reference point is Gallifrey's sun.
Do you see any green swirling haze like that anywhere between Mars and >>>>> Jupiter in the Earth's solar system? NO! There isn't any.
So? IT was seen from inside the TARDIS.
What difference does that make? There's no green haze between Mars and
Jupiter.
The same will be seen if anyone tries to access Axos.
Of what relevance is that? There's no green haze between Mars and Jupiter.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Verily, in article <10uhvte$305m$7@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did >doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
I am referring to Newtonian Physics
and
that those protostars can be as powerful as our sun one day.
None of them are big enough to ignite. They're often called "failed
stars," though the only failure is not attracting enough matter.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
Planets do not go spontaneously breaking themselves apart and forming asteroid belts. There is no reference any asteroid belt in the script
and an inhabited planet wouldn't be sitting in the middle of one, which
it wasn't in any case from the distance given.
The only real reason to think that the Fendahl came from Gallifrey's
system is the reference to Gallifreyan mythology and specifically to
using the Fendahl to frighten children. The Time Lords travel through
Exactly. It's the only possible way to interpret that sentence of
dialogue and everything that came after it.
time and space so easily that their culture could include componentsExcept they don't and it doesn't. That's why the Doctor left. They're
from anywhere and anywhen.
all completely insular. They didn't even found any colonies, so why
would something that was not inside their own solar system influence
their own mythology?
Verily, in article <10ugpko$30u25$1@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
At a guess about the same distance as Earth is from the sun. Somewhere
inside the habitable zone, roughly between the distance of the orbits of
Venus and Mars for a main sequence star the size of the sun.
Do we know that Gallifrey's star is a yellow dwarf? I haven't seen that information anywhere.
I'm trying to think of what the sun looks like on Gallifrey, when we've visited the Gallifreyan outdoors. Of course, those scenes have to be
shot in Earth's outdoors, and we couldn't expect them to build an
artificial sun with that era's budgets.
In article <10ui0ao$3c621$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 11:26, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ugqig$91l$5@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Then
how come from the script
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles out
and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
Start point Earth.
I've poked at this a little more. Most external sources (e.g., The
Discontinuity Guide) think this was the Solar System.
And they are all wrong. Keith Topping is probably the source of this
mistaken belief since the early to mid 90s when The Discontinuity Guide
was published, and his sources mostly came from usenet posts. I should
be entitled to a refund of what I paid for it.
I am trying to recall when in the 1990s.
Modern astronomers no longer believe that the Asteroid Belt is the
remains of a single body, but it was a popular theory when Image of the
Fendahl was written.
It was never the popular belief even at the time of Image of the
Fendahl. The standard theory was that electrostatic forces caused
particles to come together and form larger bodies which eventually grew
large enough to be attracted together by gravity as the dominantly force
gathering around them everything in their wake until they all coalesced
and formed into planets clearing up everything in the region in which
they orbited. The asteroid belt failed to do this due to the influence
of Jupiter's gravity. This all occurred 4.6 billion years ago, not 12
million years ago. Gravity would have brought all of the remnants of any
subsequent collision back together again.
Planets do not go spontaneously breaking themselves apart and forming
asteroid belts. There is no reference any asteroid belt in the script
and an inhabited planet wouldn't be sitting in the middle of one, which
it wasn't in any case from the distance given.
The only real reason to think that the Fendahl came from Gallifrey's
system is the reference to Gallifreyan mythology and specifically to
using the Fendahl to frighten children. The Time Lords travel through
Exactly. It's the only possible way to interpret that sentence of
dialogue and everything that came after it.
5th Pleant in which Solar System?
--time and space so easily that their culture could include componentsExcept they don't and it doesn't. That's why the Doctor left. They're
from anywhere and anywhen.
all completely insular. They didn't even found any colonies, so why
would something that was not inside their own solar system influence
their own mythology?
Verily, in article <10ui0ao$3c621$1@dont-email.me>, did >agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
Planets do not go spontaneously breaking themselves apart and forming
asteroid belts. There is no reference any asteroid belt in the script
and an inhabited planet wouldn't be sitting in the middle of one, which
it wasn't in any case from the distance given.
I don't think anyone ever thought it was spontaneous. As I heard it, the >theory involved a cataclysm, maybe a good thump from a comet.
The only real reason to think that the Fendahl came from Gallifrey's
system is the reference to Gallifreyan mythology and specifically to
using the Fendahl to frighten children. The Time Lords travel through
Exactly. It's the only possible way to interpret that sentence of
dialogue and everything that came after it.
time and space so easily that their culture could include componentsExcept they don't and it doesn't. That's why the Doctor left. They're
from anywhere and anywhen.
all completely insular. They didn't even found any colonies, so why
would something that was not inside their own solar system influence
their own mythology?
Probably because the Fendahl can move across space. If you don't eat
your green beans, they might come to Gallifrey and get you. That's all
the logic a bogeyman needs, and it works just as well for a planet in
the same system or one from a different system.
Wherever they first came from, they're scary.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
On 19/05/2026 11:21, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ugpko$30u25$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
At a guess about the same distance as Earth is from the sun. Somewhere
inside the habitable zone, roughly between the distance of the orbits of >>> Venus and Mars for a main sequence star the size of the sun.
Do we know that Gallifrey's star is a yellow dwarf? I haven't seen that
information anywhere.
By the look of The Five Doctor's it's just gone off the main sequence,
then again that was depicting the Phantom Zone or whatever they called
the sand pit they used to film it.
I'm trying to think of what the sun looks like on Gallifrey, when we've
visited the Gallifreyan outdoors. Of course, those scenes have to be
shot in Earth's outdoors, and we couldn't expect them to build an
artificial sun with that era's budgets.
They put a purple filter on top of the camera lens in The Five Doctors.
I can't remember what they did in The Invasion of Time but we'll find
out in 3 stories' time. I remember the trees and grass being green and
there were no stupid deserts outside the citadel like the degenerate
Davies depicted Gallifrey after the Time War.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 19/05/2026 17:02, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ui0ao$3c621$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 11:26, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ugqig$91l$5@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Then
how come from the script
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles out
and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
Start point Earth.
I've poked at this a little more. Most external sources (e.g., The
Discontinuity Guide) think this was the Solar System.
And they are all wrong. Keith Topping is probably the source of this
mistaken belief since the early to mid 90s when The Discontinuity Guide
was published, and his sources mostly came from usenet posts. I should
be entitled to a refund of what I paid for it.
I am trying to recall when in the 1990s.
I could look on the back cover but I'm not going to waste my time and
get covered in dust in the process. It might have several editions. They >should provide me with a digital upgrade in epub format to put on my >ereaders. The same for my Fourth Doctor Handbook.
Modern astronomers no longer believe that the Asteroid Belt is the
remains of a single body, but it was a popular theory when Image of the >>>> Fendahl was written.
It was never the popular belief even at the time of Image of the
Fendahl. The standard theory was that electrostatic forces caused
particles to come together and form larger bodies which eventually grew
large enough to be attracted together by gravity as the dominantly force >>> gathering around them everything in their wake until they all coalesced
and formed into planets clearing up everything in the region in which
they orbited. The asteroid belt failed to do this due to the influence
of Jupiter's gravity. This all occurred 4.6 billion years ago, not 12
million years ago. Gravity would have brought all of the remnants of any >>> subsequent collision back together again.
Planets do not go spontaneously breaking themselves apart and forming
asteroid belts. There is no reference any asteroid belt in the script
and an inhabited planet wouldn't be sitting in the middle of one, which
it wasn't in any case from the distance given.
The only real reason to think that the Fendahl came from Gallifrey's
system is the reference to Gallifreyan mythology and specifically to
using the Fendahl to frighten children. The Time Lords travel through
Exactly. It's the only possible way to interpret that sentence of
dialogue and everything that came after it.
5th Pleant in which Solar System?
In the solar system of GALLIFREY! You've been told that repeatedly.
--
time and space so easily that their culture could include componentsExcept they don't and it doesn't. That's why the Doctor left. They're
from anywhere and anywhen.
all completely insular. They didn't even found any colonies, so why
would something that was not inside their own solar system influence
their own mythology?
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Verily, in article <10ui0ao$3c621$1@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
Planets do not go spontaneously breaking themselves apart and forming
asteroid belts. There is no reference any asteroid belt in the script
and an inhabited planet wouldn't be sitting in the middle of one, which
it wasn't in any case from the distance given.
I don't think anyone ever thought it was spontaneous. As I heard it, the theory involved a cataclysm, maybe a good thump from a comet.
The only real reason to think that the Fendahl came from Gallifrey's
system is the reference to Gallifreyan mythology and specifically to
using the Fendahl to frighten children. The Time Lords travel through
Exactly. It's the only possible way to interpret that sentence of
dialogue and everything that came after it.
time and space so easily that their culture could include componentsExcept they don't and it doesn't. That's why the Doctor left. They're
from anywhere and anywhen.
all completely insular. They didn't even found any colonies, so why
would something that was not inside their own solar system influence
their own mythology?
Probably because the Fendahl can move across space. If you don't eat
your green beans, they might come to Gallifrey and get you. That's all
the logic a bogeyman needs, and it works just as well for a planet in
the same system or one from a different system.
Wherever they first came from, they're scary.
In article <10uhgug$3754l$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 1:26 am, The True Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
Did anyone here apart from me pass their O-Level English Language andNot me!! Year Eleven Maths and English, sure, and I think I even passed
O-Level Mathematics (or equivalent) exams with decent grades?
Year Twelve English.
I've got no idea how Your O-Levels (Ordinary-Levels, I think) compares
to our Years Eleven and Twelve..
IIRC O-Level is in North Anerica Grade 9 tests so I.E. 14 -15 years
old getting tested
I.E. Aust Year 9 .
Verily, in article <10ugvhr$32813$1@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 18/05/2026 22:51, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sun in >>>> Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any sun, >>>> ie. a star orbited by planets.
Many use Sol for our star's name, Terra for our planet's name, and Luna
for our moon's name.
You would if you're Italian. In other languages they have different names.
Haven't you seen SF writers refer to Sol and Terra and Luna while
writing in English? I have, and it's pretty common.
It's from Latin, not modern Italian.
<<AI Overview solar system/'s??l? ?s?st?m/
A solar system is a star and all the celestial objects that are bound to
it by gravity. This includes planets, dwarf planets, moons, asteroids,
comets, and dust, all orbiting the central star.
When capitalized, the Solar System specifically refers to our own cosmic
neighborhood?the Sun and everything that orbits it.>>
The script has it in lower case, as does the Target novelisation.
Therefore, it isn't reoffering to our own cosmic neighbourhood, it's
referring to an alien one, that of Gallifrey.
You're assuming the writers and editor understood the capitalization and
its meaning. Unfortunately, that's not a safe assumption.
In article <MPG.447607682a6deef7989ec5@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10ugvhr$32813$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
Haven't you seen SF writers refer to Sol and Terra and Luna while
On 18/05/2026 22:51, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sun in >>>>> Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any sun, >>>>> ie. a star orbited by planets.
Many use Sol for our star's name, Terra for our planet's name, and Luna >>>> for our moon's name.
You would if you're Italian. In other languages they have different names. >>
writing in English? I have, and it's pretty common.
It's from Latin, not modern Italian.
Correct! The basis of Scientific Genus.
In article <10ugutg$322sq$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 05:49, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ugo6m$30ig4$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 03:45, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:00, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 3:34 am, The True Doctor wrote:No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sun in >>>>>> Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any sun, >>>>>> ie. a star orbited by planets.
On 16/05/2026 05:02, The Doctor wrote:
This is a classic!
Sorry but the information from ChatGPT and Google Gamini are not as >>>>>>>>> accurate as view it.
What you have written is not a review. It's a series of notes.
AS USUAL for the asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their >>>>>>> joy of child sexual molestation cleanup)!
Where is your analysis?
Wanda as Miss Ransome. Yes she is talented and should have been the >>>>>>>>> Doctor's companion with Jamie instead of Victoria Waterfield. >>>>>>>>>
The Scientists - A great misguised lot trying to see on the
evolution of mankind.
They open up a fissure in space - Time and the Doctor to the Rescue >>>>>>>>> with Leela.
Note that the Fissure did get the attention of the Doctor.
also, IotF was set in 1984 Fetchborough.
Horro Claasic indeed.
The Doctor being scared off by a legend of the Fendahl.
The 5th Planet that become the asteroid belt. Hmm! Interesting >>>>>>>>> concept.
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same >>>>>>>> system as Gallifry and the Time Lords placed it in a time loop so >>>>>>>> even if it formed an asteroid belt 12 million years ago it's isn't >>>>>>>> the one in our Solar System which is 4.6 billion years old and it >>>>>>>> wouldn't be possible to observe it in Gallyfrey's solar system
A Very minor nit-pick .... We live in THE Solar System because the >>>>>>> Ancient Greeks (or whomever) named Our Star 'Sol'. Gallyfreyian's might >>>>>>
have named they star 'SOL', but I doubt it so they don't live in a Solar
System . Stellar System, sure, but not the Solar System.
The terms solar system and star system (stellar system) are
interchangeable and hardly anyone uses the term stellar system anyway. >>>>>>
The Sun is a star.
Oh really? I thought it was a giant torch carried in Helios' chariot
across the sky.
What exactly is the point that you are trying to make Mr. AI chat bot? >>>>
The point about Sol.
Which is? Were you in remedial class at school?
Melissa is talking about Solar Syatems.
On 19/05/2026 2:16 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/05/2026 03:45, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor
<agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:00, Daniel70 wrote:
<Snip>
A Very minor nit-pick .... We live in THE Solar System because
the Ancient Greeks (or whomever) named Our Star 'Sol'.
Gallyfreyian's might
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means
sun in Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies
to any sun, ie. a star orbited by planets.
have named they star 'SOL', but I doubt it so they don't live
in a Solar System . Stellar System, sure, but not the Solar
System.
The terms solar system and star system (stellar system) are
interchangeable and hardly anyone uses the term stellar system
anyway.
The Sun is a star.
Oh really? I thought it was a giant torch carried in Helios' chariot
across the sky.
Ah!! But then you would only see the 'giant torch' when you were behind
the chariot .... Or was it on the front of the chariot sort of like a Headlight??
What exactly is the point that you are trying to make Mr. AI chat
bot?
Is he EVER trying to make a point .... or just a post to increase his
All Important Precise Post Count??
On 19/05/2026 7:43 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:00, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 3:34 am, The True Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same
system as Gallifry and the Time Lords placed it in a time loop so
even if it formed an asteroid belt 12 million years ago it's isn't
the one in our Solar System which is 4.6 billion years old and it
wouldn't be possible to observe it in Gallyfrey's solar system
A Very minor nit-pick .... We live in THE Solar System because the
Ancient Greeks (or whomever) named Our Star 'Sol'. Gallyfreyian's might
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sun in
Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any sun,
ie. a star orbited by planets.
If the Gallifreyans had, at some time, spoked Latin, then, Yes, they
might have called their STAR Sol and (but which one ... if they are in a Binary Star system??), therefore, Gallifrey would be in a Solar
System .... but what would the chances of THAT having occurred be?
Long Odds, I might suggest!!
have named they star 'SOL', but I doubt it so they don't live in a Solar >>> System . Stellar System, sure, but not the Solar System.
The terms solar system and star system (stellar system) are
interchangeable and hardly anyone uses the term stellar system anyway.
"Interchangeable" .... if you don't care for ACCURACY!! (O.K., I have
been called a Pedant at times!)
In article <10ugvhr$32813$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 22:51, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sun in >>>> Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any sun, >>>> ie. a star orbited by planets.
Many use Sol for our star's name, Terra for our planet's name, and Luna
for our moon's name.
You would if you're Italian. In other languages they have different names. >>
What about Latin?
Capitalization matters. A solar system isn't> necessarily the Solarsystem... but most people would probably say "star
system" for others.
<<AI Overview solar system/ˈsəʊlə ˌsɪstɪm/
A solar system is a star and all the celestial objects that are bound to
it by gravity. This includes planets, dwarf planets, moons, asteroids,
comets, and dust, all orbiting the central star.
When capitalized, the Solar System specifically refers to our own cosmic
neighborhood—the Sun and everything that orbits it.>>
The script has it in lower case, as does the Target novelisation.
Therefore, it isn't reoffering to our own cosmic neighbourhood, it's
referring to an alien one, that of Gallifrey.
Which pages?
Verily, in article <10ugurl$322sq$1@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
It's already been explained to you that the Doctor is referring to his
own solar system and the script is explicit in that.
It isn't explicit. It's implied by the line about Gallifreyan folklore,
but it's never said explicitly.
In article <10ugurl$322sq$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 06:00, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ugpp4$30u25$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 03:42, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.44751fcae1330f5a989ebe@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10ufadb$2j821$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 18/05/2026 14:26, The Doctor wrote:Supposed to have
[quoted text muted]
(The glow has gone, and Thea wakes up.)
DOCTOR: Come and sit down. You'll be all right.
COLBY: Embryo what?
DOCTOR: Embryo Fendahleen. A creature from my own mythology.
perished when the fifth planet broke up. At least, so they said. >>>>>>>Gallyfreyan mythology, therefore the 5th planet in the system of >>>>>>> Gallifrey. Basic comprehension really.
[quoted text muted]
[Tardis]
(In flight.)
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles
out and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
The 5th planet is 107,000,000 miles out from the sun in the system of >>>>>>> Gallifrey.
Mars on the other hand is the 4th planet in the Earth's solar system and
is 142 million miles out from the sun.
Now answer this question, how can a 5th planet be closer than a 4th >>>>>>> planet in the same solar system?
The answer is that there are NOT in the same solar system. The planet >>>>>>> the Fendahl came from was the 5 planet in the solar system of GALLIFREY!
That's a good case. I concede the point.
I don't. The Doctor was travelling 12 000 000 years back in time
107 000 000 miles from Earth.
No he wast. He was inside the TARDIS studying Time Lord records dating >>>> back 12 million years into the history of his own solar system and got >>>> angry at the Time Lords trying to erase the history of their 5th planet >>>> by placing it inside a time loop.
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles out
and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
LEELA: Do you think this thing, the Fendahl, comes from the fifth planet? >>> DOCTOR: Well, it came from it a long time ago,
before your species evolved on Earth.
LEELA: How did it travel?
DOCTOR: What?
LEELA: Well, you said there's only one. It could not build a spacecraft. >>> How did it get to Earth?
DOCTOR: Well, it. Well, it probably used that enormous stockpile
of energy to project itself across space.
LEELA: Oh, you mean the way lightning travels.
DOCTOR: No. Yes, well, something like that. Humans speak of astral projection,
travelling psychically to different planets. That could be a race memory. >>> LEELA: Race memory?
And your point is what? That you know almost nothing about astronomy and
have virtually no ability whatsoever in English comprehension?
It's already been explained to you that the Doctor is referring to his
own solar system and the script is explicit in that.
Is he? IF so, explain your point by scrutinizing the script.
--Book yourself an
adult education course and learn English Language.
As for the angry, he should be grateful the
Time Lords are protecting the universe.
On 19/05/2026 17:13, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ui0ao$3c621$1@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
Planets do not go spontaneously breaking themselves apart and forming
asteroid belts. There is no reference any asteroid belt in the script
and an inhabited planet wouldn't be sitting in the middle of one, which
it wasn't in any case from the distance given.
I don't think anyone ever thought it was spontaneous. As I heard it, the theory involved a cataclysm, maybe a good thump from a comet.
Did the Earth break up when it got hit by the asteroid that wiped out
the dinosaurs (except for birds)? Did the Earth break up and form an asteroid belt when it collied with another planet to form the moon? No
of course it didn't and that theory was going around since at least the early 70s long before Image of the Fendahl was made. There is therefore
no kind of suggestion of an asteroid belt being formed.
Keith Topping and usenet seems to be the original source of this
nonsense. The actual script and novelisation places the Fendahl's planet
in the system of Gallifrey which we now know is about 680 light years
away unless the skull teleported itself to Earth. How long did it take
the Hand of Fear to get here again?
They'reExcept they don't and it doesn't. That's why the Doctor left.
all completely insular. They didn't even found any colonies, so why
would something that was not inside their own solar system influence
their own mythology?
Probably because the Fendahl can move across space. If you don't eat
Why would it know about Gallifrey?
I suspect a Time Lord experiment in telepathy gone wrong, just likethe
Time Lords messing up with their attempt to advance the technology of
the Minyans and the Doctor messing up with Xoanon.
Verily, in article <10ui3er$3d68h$1@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 19/05/2026 17:13, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ui0ao$3c621$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
Planets do not go spontaneously breaking themselves apart and forming
asteroid belts. There is no reference any asteroid belt in the script
and an inhabited planet wouldn't be sitting in the middle of one, which >>>> it wasn't in any case from the distance given.
I don't think anyone ever thought it was spontaneous. As I heard it, the >>> theory involved a cataclysm, maybe a good thump from a comet.
Did the Earth break up when it got hit by the asteroid that wiped out
the dinosaurs (except for birds)? Did the Earth break up and form an
asteroid belt when it collied with another planet to form the moon? No
of course it didn't and that theory was going around since at least the
early 70s long before Image of the Fendahl was made. There is therefore
no kind of suggestion of an asteroid belt being formed.
A comet's a lot bigger than an asteroid, and traveling very quickly.
This theory is no longer widely believed, though. Known mechanisms are
enough to account for it, so we apply Occam's Razor and refrain from multiplying entities needlessly.
Keith Topping and usenet seems to be the original source of this
nonsense. The actual script and novelisation places the Fendahl's planet
in the system of Gallifrey which we now know is about 680 light years
away unless the skull teleported itself to Earth. How long did it take
the Hand of Fear to get here again?
It references Gallifreyan folklore, but never says where the Fendahl's
planet is beyond "the fifth planet."
They'reExcept they don't and it doesn't. That's why the Doctor left.
all completely insular. They didn't even found any colonies, so why
would something that was not inside their own solar system influence
their own mythology?
Probably because the Fendahl can move across space. If you don't eat
Why would it know about Gallifrey?
Why would it need to? All that's necessary is that the Gallifreyans know about it.
I suspect a Time Lord experiment in telepathy gone wrong, just likethe
Time Lords messing up with their attempt to advance the technology of
the Minyans and the Doctor messing up with Xoanon.
Hmm, now that's an interesting idea.
Verily, in article <MPG.447603b711858e46989ec2@news.eternal-
september.org>, did thetruemelissa@gmail.com deliver unto us this
message:
Verily, in article <10ugpko$30u25$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
At a guess about the same distance as Earth is from the sun. Somewhere
inside the habitable zone, roughly between the distance of the orbits of >>> Venus and Mars for a main sequence star the size of the sun.
Do we know that Gallifrey's star is a yellow dwarf? I haven't seen that
information anywhere.
I'm trying to think of what the sun looks like on Gallifrey, when we've
visited the Gallifreyan outdoors. Of course, those scenes have to be
shot in Earth's outdoors, and we couldn't expect them to build an
artificial sun with that era's budgets.
Wait wait waaaaaaaait a minute. Gallifrey's sun is a binary pair, isn't
it?
https://tardis.fandom.com/wiki/Gallifrey#Star_system
Gallifrey probably orbits the larger red one.
It's the only idea that makes sense. Everything in the script points
towards Gallifrey, the Time Lords interfering, and the 5th planet being
in their solar system. You'd have to rewrite the laws of English
language comprehension, physics, and mathematics for it to be otherwise.
On 19/05/2026 9:59 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10uhiru$37npd$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
The second star seemed to rise in the East .... and both set in
the South!!
What a wacko orbit Gallifrey must have!!
It didn't orbit the smaller star, so the smaller star didn't have a
straight path across the sky. Makes sense to me.
The two stars would have orbited a common mid-point just as The Moon
doesn't really orbit The Earth, they both orbit a common mid-point,
which I think is just below The Earth's crust but nowhere near the
middle of The Earth.
As for the vampires, check out State of Decay. Or don't, since theAh!! So there ARE Vampires on Gallifrey, are there?
rewatch parties will reach it soon.
On 19/05/2026 13:32, Daniel70 wrote:
On 19/05/2026 9:59 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10uhiru$37npd$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
The second star seemed to rise in the East .... and both set in
the South!!
What a wacko orbit Gallifrey must have!!
It didn't orbit the smaller star, so the smaller star didn't have a
straight path across the sky. Makes sense to me.
The two stars would have orbited a common mid-point just as The Moon
doesn't really orbit The Earth, they both orbit a common mid-point,
which I think is just below The Earth's crust but nowhere near the
middle of The Earth.
What? Stop making up bullshit physics. Everything orbits the common
centre of gravity which in the case of our solar system is almost smack
bang in the middle of the sun and both the Earth and the Sun and all the other planets orbit around that.
For a binary system with similar sized stars it would be somewhere
between the two stars and this fact would make the climate on any planet orbiting the same centre of mass completely unstable by causing it to go from extreme heat to extreme cold or less extreme heat. Also the orbits
of the planets would keep shifting and eventually become unstable if
certain criteria are not met to achieve stability.
As for the vampires, check out State of Decay. Or don't, since theAh!! So there ARE Vampires on Gallifrey, are there?
rewatch parties will reach it soon.
No. They fought in a war against the Time Lords.
In article <MPG.44765121cbe063f0989ed0@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10uhvte$305m$7@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
I am referring to Newtonian Physics
and
that those protostars can be as powerful as our sun one day.
None of them are big enough to ignite. They're often called "failed
stars," though the only failure is not attracting enough matter.
Of course that could change.
On 19/05/2026 17:13, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ui0ao$3c621$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
Planets do not go spontaneously breaking themselves apart and forming
asteroid belts. There is no reference any asteroid belt in the script
and an inhabited planet wouldn't be sitting in the middle of one, which
it wasn't in any case from the distance given.
I don't think anyone ever thought it was spontaneous. As I heard it, the
theory involved a cataclysm, maybe a good thump from a comet.
Did the Earth break up when it got hit by the asteroid that wiped out
the dinosaurs (except for birds)? Did the Earth break up and form an >asteroid belt when it collied with another planet to form the moon? No
of course it didn't and that theory was going around since at least the >early 70s long before Image of the Fendahl was made. There is therefore
no kind of suggestion of an asteroid belt being formed.
Keith Topping and usenet seems to be the original source of this
nonsense. The actual script and novelisation places the Fendahl's planet
in the system of Gallifrey which we now know is about 680 light years
away unless the skull teleported itself to Earth. How long did it take
the Hand of Fear to get here again?
The only real reason to think that the Fendahl came from Gallifrey's
system is the reference to Gallifreyan mythology and specifically to
using the Fendahl to frighten children. The Time Lords travel through
Exactly. It's the only possible way to interpret that sentence of
dialogue and everything that came after it.
time and space so easily that their culture could include componentsExcept they don't and it doesn't. That's why the Doctor left. They're
from anywhere and anywhen.
all completely insular. They didn't even found any colonies, so why
would something that was not inside their own solar system influence
their own mythology?
Probably because the Fendahl can move across space. If you don't eat
Why would it know about Gallifrey?
your green beans, they might come to Gallifrey and get you. That's all
the logic a bogeyman needs, and it works just as well for a planet in
the same system or one from a different system.
It only works if the Fendahl is from the same system as Gallifrey and
its planet was probably a Gallifreyan colony, which would also explain
it's humanoid form and telepathic abilities.
Wherever they first came from, they're scary.
I suspect a Time Lord experiment in telepathy gone wrong, just like the
Time Lords messing up with their attempt to advance the technology of
the Minyans and the Doctor messing up with Xoanon.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 19/05/2026 15:12, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10uhgug$3754l$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 1:26 am, The True Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
Did anyone here apart from me pass their O-Level English Language andNot me!! Year Eleven Maths and English, sure, and I think I even passed
O-Level Mathematics (or equivalent) exams with decent grades?
Year Twelve English.
I've got no idea how Your O-Levels (Ordinary-Levels, I think) compares
to our Years Eleven and Twelve..
IIRC O-Level is in North Anerica Grade 9 tests so I.E. 14 -15 years
old getting tested
I.E. Aust Year 9 .
O-Levels were for 15-16 year olds.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 19/05/2026 11:37, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ugvhr$32813$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
Haven't you seen SF writers refer to Sol and Terra and Luna while
On 18/05/2026 22:51, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sun in >>>>> Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any sun, >>>>> ie. a star orbited by planets.
Many use Sol for our star's name, Terra for our planet's name, and Luna >>>> for our moon's name.
You would if you're Italian. In other languages they have different names. >>
writing in English? I have, and it's pretty common.
It's only used by Italians and some science fiction writers. E E Smith >referred to Earth as Tellus in his Lensman series.
It's from Latin, not modern Italian.
But only the modern Italians use it. Everyone else uses their own native >names for Earth and the Sun. If there's going to be a common term that >aliens will use it will either be the original English terms or with the
way things are going Chinese. You better get used to Diqiu and Taiyang.
--
<<AI Overview solar system/'s??l? ?s?st?m/
A solar system is a star and all the celestial objects that are bound to >>> it by gravity. This includes planets, dwarf planets, moons, asteroids,
comets, and dust, all orbiting the central star.
When capitalized, the Solar System specifically refers to our own cosmic >>> neighborhood?the Sun and everything that orbits it.>>
The script has it in lower case, as does the Target novelisation.
Therefore, it isn't reoffering to our own cosmic neighbourhood, it's
referring to an alien one, that of Gallifrey.
You're assuming the writers and editor understood the capitalization and
its meaning. Unfortunately, that's not a safe assumption.
Terrance Dicks was not a fool. That it's a reference to Gallifrey's
solar system is clear from the dialogue connecting it to Time Lord
mythology and the Doctor mentioning both in the same sentence. He is
talking about his own culture and history.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 19/05/2026 15:05, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.447607682a6deef7989ec5@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10ugvhr$32813$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
Haven't you seen SF writers refer to Sol and Terra and Luna while
On 18/05/2026 22:51, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sun in >>>>>> Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any sun, >>>>>> ie. a star orbited by planets.
Many use Sol for our star's name, Terra for our planet's name, and Luna >>>>> for our moon's name.
You would if you're Italian. In other languages they have different names. >>>
writing in English? I have, and it's pretty common.
It's from Latin, not modern Italian.
Correct! The basis of Scientific Genus.
Genus is from Greek not Latin. Most biological terms are Greek because >biology was invented by Aristotle.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 19/05/2026 14:46, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ugutg$322sq$2@dont-email.me>,No she isn't. She's talking about solar systems in lower case.
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 05:49, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ugo6m$30ig4$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 03:45, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:00, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 3:34 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 16/05/2026 05:02, The Doctor wrote:AS USUAL for the asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their >>>>>>>> joy of child sexual molestation cleanup)!
This is a classic!
Sorry but the information from ChatGPT and Google Gamini are not as >>>>>>>>>> accurate as view it.
What you have written is not a review. It's a series of notes. >>>>>>>>
Where is your analysis?A Very minor nit-pick .... We live in THE Solar System because the >>>>>>>> Ancient Greeks (or whomever) named Our Star 'Sol'. Gallyfreyian's might
Wanda as Miss Ransome. Yes she is talented and should have been the >>>>>>>>>> Doctor's companion with Jamie instead of Victoria Waterfield. >>>>>>>>>>
The Scientists - A great misguised lot trying to see on the >>>>>>>>>> evolution of mankind.
They open up a fissure in space - Time and the Doctor to the Rescue >>>>>>>>>> with Leela.
Note that the Fissure did get the attention of the Doctor. >>>>>>>>>>
also, IotF was set in 1984 Fetchborough.
Horro Claasic indeed.
The Doctor being scared off by a legend of the Fendahl.
The 5th Planet that become the asteroid belt. Hmm! Interesting >>>>>>>>>> concept.
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same >>>>>>>>> system as Gallifry and the Time Lords placed it in a time loop so >>>>>>>>> even if it formed an asteroid belt 12 million years ago it's isn't >>>>>>>>> the one in our Solar System which is 4.6 billion years old and it >>>>>>>>> wouldn't be possible to observe it in Gallyfrey's solar system >>>>>>>>
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sun in >>>>>>> Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any sun, >>>>>>> ie. a star orbited by planets.
have named they star 'SOL', but I doubt it so they don't live in a Solar
System . Stellar System, sure, but not the Solar System.
The terms solar system and star system (stellar system) are
interchangeable and hardly anyone uses the term stellar system anyway. >>>>>>>
The Sun is a star.
Oh really? I thought it was a giant torch carried in Helios' chariot >>>>> across the sky.
What exactly is the point that you are trying to make Mr. AI chat bot? >>>>>
The point about Sol.
Which is? Were you in remedial class at school?
Melissa is talking about Solar Syatems.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 19/05/2026 13:21, Daniel70 wrote:
On 19/05/2026 2:16 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/05/2026 03:45, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor
<agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:00, Daniel70 wrote:
<Snip>
A Very minor nit-pick .... We live in THE Solar System because
the Ancient Greeks (or whomever) named Our Star 'Sol'.
Gallyfreyian's might
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means
sun in Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies
to any sun, ie. a star orbited by planets.
have named they star 'SOL', but I doubt it so they don't live
in a Solar System . Stellar System, sure, but not the Solar
System.
The terms solar system and star system (stellar system) are
interchangeable and hardly anyone uses the term stellar system
anyway.
The Sun is a star.
Oh really? I thought it was a giant torch carried in Helios' chariot
across the sky.
Ah!! But then you would only see the 'giant torch' when you were behind
the chariot .... Or was it on the front of the chariot sort of like a
Headlight??
It was held in a cauldron above the top of the chariot so you could see
it from all directions.
What exactly is the point that you are trying to make Mr. AI chat
bot?
Is he EVER trying to make a point .... or just a post to increase his
All Important Precise Post Count??
He wants to impress us with his AI scripting ability from the 1980s. AI >scripting has progressed a lot since his scripts were made. He should
try incorporating Grok in them. I think there's a script to do that on >GitHub.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 19/05/2026 13:06, Daniel70 wrote:
On 19/05/2026 7:43 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:00, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 3:34 am, The True Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sun inWhat asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same
system as Gallifry and the Time Lords placed it in a time loop so
even if it formed an asteroid belt 12 million years ago it's isn't
the one in our Solar System which is 4.6 billion years old and it
wouldn't be possible to observe it in Gallyfrey's solar system
A Very minor nit-pick .... We live in THE Solar System because the
Ancient Greeks (or whomever) named Our Star 'Sol'. Gallyfreyian's might >>>
Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any sun,
ie. a star orbited by planets.
If the Gallifreyans had, at some time, spoked Latin, then, Yes, they
No they spoke Greek. Old High Gallifreyan was written in Greek characters.
might have called their STAR Sol and (but which one ... if they are in a
Binary Star system??), therefore, Gallifrey would be in a Solar
System .... but what would the chances of THAT having occurred be?
Long Odds, I might suggest!!
Gallifrey would be in a solar system no matter what language they spoke. >Their sun would have been called the sun in all Gallifreyan languages.
Solar system is a generic scientific term for all bodies orbiting or >interacting with a star through gravity.
--have named they star 'SOL', but I doubt it so they don't live in a Solar >>>> System . Stellar System, sure, but not the Solar System.
The terms solar system and star system (stellar system) are
interchangeable and hardly anyone uses the term stellar system anyway.
"Interchangeable" .... if you don't care for ACCURACY!! (O.K., I have
been called a Pedant at times!)
The terms are completely interchangeable.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
In article <10uhtu6$3bau2$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 15:02, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ugvnl$32813$2@dont-email.me>,which blew
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 05:51, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ugoti$30okn$1@dont-email.me>,same system
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 03:41, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ufide$2lvag$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 14:09, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ueie3$2bnu8$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 17/05/2026 20:56, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ud36c$1tcfo$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 17/05/2026 19:08, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>, did >>>>>>>>>>>>> agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the
as Gallifry
Are you sure? Where is that said?
It's said when the Doctor and Leela head back to the TARDIS to >>>> carry out
some investigations because the Fendahl was the stuff of Time Lord >>>>>>>>>>>> nightmares. It was the 5th planet in the Gallifrey's system
Earth where itup 12 million years ago and sent the skull flying off to
he slammedTime Lordswas discovered in Africa. Then the Doctor discovered that the
put the planet in a time loop and kept it all hushed up, so
the Timethe data cards on the TARDIS console in disgust. Therefore this >>>>>>>>>>>> precludes it forming any kind of asteroid belt anywhere since
carry theLords did not want any fragments of the planet to escape and
1 it wouldFendahl away with them. But they obviously missed one. >>>>>>>>>>>>
Assuming it was going at 17.0 km/s the same speed as Voyager
us took itGallifrey is 680have travelled 680 light years to get to Earth, meaning
light years away which sounds reasonable.
I know you were paying close attention, but all the rest of
the other way, and online sources also agree that it was Sol's fifth
planet.
The asteroid belt in the Solar System is 4.6 billion years old. The
Fendahl's skull was only 12 million years old. That's an astronomical
difference. You should not rely on sources generated by AI or AI >>>>>>>>>>>> chatbots like Yads. There's no mention of any asteroid belt in >>>> either to
televised episodes or the Target novelisation which I own. >>>>>>>>>>>>
That how can the Fendahl wpid out life on Mars?
It didn't. The Ice Warriors are still there.
After the Fendahl wiped out the native life.
The native life were the Ice Warriors and they didn't evolve in the last
12 million years. Did they not teach you biology and evolution at >>>>>>>> school? Oh, no, wait... You think humans have only existed for 6000 >>>>>>>> years and they were created by God rather than having evolved from >>>>>>>> primates. Are you sure you studied astronomy? Did they not teach you >>>>>>>> about the big bang, inflation, the Hubble Constant and the expansion of
the universe and how it might continue? Do you want to write an essay >>>>>>>> about the above to show me what you actually know?
Yes!
Still The Doctor did say the Fendalhl wiped out life on Mars
on its way to Earth.
No he didn't. He said it probably passed Mars along the way. Which in no >>>>>> way contradicts what I already said since Mars is on route from
Gallifrey's solar system to Earth and the Doctor makes it explicitly >>>>>> clear he is talking about his own people.
Why would the Time Lords have nightmares about a life form from a planet >>>>>> outside of their solar system? Why would it be in their mythology? Why >>>>>> would they try to erase it's existence? It's their 5th planet not ours. >>>>>>
From the script
Answer my questions. Is English your first language? What language is?
British English, then Canadian English the Quebec French .
Est 1988 in Rimouski.
What does that mean? That you've only spoken English since 1988? It figures. >>
No! read again!
dissipated
COLBY: So when the Time Lords acted, it was too late.
The Fendahl had already come here.
DOCTOR: Yes, probably taking in Mars on it's way through.
COLBY: Then it got itself buried, but not killed.
DOCTOR: The Fendahl is death. How do you kill death? No, what happened was
this. The energy amassed by the Fendahl was stored in the skull and
lifeform thatslowly as a biological transmutation field. Now, any appropriate
somethingcame within the field was altered so that it ultimately evolved into
And your point is what? That you're totally incapable of explainingsuitable for the Fendahl to use.So what? What is your point?
COLBY: Are you saying that skull created man?
DOCTOR: No, I'm saying it may have effected his evolution.
And then there is Scaroth the Jaggeroth.
Why am I talking to a pirmative AI chat both from the 1980s.
REcall how DW see Evolution from Earth's Point of views.
anything to anyone...?
Egads.
what about the Jageroth and the Fendahl?
On 19/05/2026 14:48, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ugvhr$32813$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 22:51, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sun in >>>>> Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any sun, >>>>> ie. a star orbited by planets.
Many use Sol for our star's name, Terra for our planet's name, and Luna >>>> for our moon's name.
You would if you're Italian. In other languages they have different names. >>>
What about Latin?
Capitalization matters. A solar system isn't> necessarily the Solarsystem... but most people would probably say "star
system" for others.
<<AI Overview solar system/ˈsəʊlə ˌsɪstɪm/
A solar system is a star and all the celestial objects that are bound to >>> it by gravity. This includes planets, dwarf planets, moons, asteroids,
comets, and dust, all orbiting the central star.
When capitalized, the Solar System specifically refers to our own cosmic >>> neighborhood—the Sun and everything that orbits it.>>
The script has it in lower case, as does the Target novelisation.
Therefore, it isn't reoffering to our own cosmic neighbourhood, it's
referring to an alien one, that of Gallifrey.
Which pages?
The chapters have titles. Go and figure it out from those.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 19/05/2026 11:31, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ugurl$322sq$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
It's already been explained to you that the Doctor is referring to his
own solar system and the script is explicit in that.
It isn't explicit. It's implied by the line about Gallifreyan folklore,
but it's never said explicitly.
There's only one way that that line of dialogue can be interpreted
unless you break the laws of English comprehension, therefore it's
explicit. And that's before we get down to actual physics and astronomy >which also justify the locations being Gallifrey's solar system.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 19/05/2026 14:45, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ugurl$322sq$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 06:00, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ugpp4$30u25$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 03:42, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.44751fcae1330f5a989ebe@news.eternal-september.org>, >>>>>> The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10ufadb$2j821$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 18/05/2026 14:26, The Doctor wrote:Supposed to have
[quoted text muted]
(The glow has gone, and Thea wakes up.)
DOCTOR: Come and sit down. You'll be all right.
COLBY: Embryo what?
DOCTOR: Embryo Fendahleen. A creature from my own mythology.
perished when the fifth planet broke up. At least, so they said. >>>>>>>>Gallyfreyan mythology, therefore the 5th planet in the system of >>>>>>>> Gallifrey. Basic comprehension really.
[quoted text muted]
[Tardis]
(In flight.)
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles >>>>>>>>> out and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
The 5th planet is 107,000,000 miles out from the sun in the system of >>>>>>>> Gallifrey.
Mars on the other hand is the 4th planet in the Earth's solar system and
is 142 million miles out from the sun.
Now answer this question, how can a 5th planet be closer than a 4th >>>>>>>> planet in the same solar system?
The answer is that there are NOT in the same solar system. The planet >>>>>>>> the Fendahl came from was the 5 planet in the solar system of GALLIFREY!
That's a good case. I concede the point.
I don't. The Doctor was travelling 12 000 000 years back in time
107 000 000 miles from Earth.
No he wast. He was inside the TARDIS studying Time Lord records dating >>>>> back 12 million years into the history of his own solar system and got >>>>> angry at the Time Lords trying to erase the history of their 5th planet >>>>> by placing it inside a time loop.
DOCTOR: The fifth planet's a hundred and seven million miles out
and twelve million years back, so we've no time to lose.
LEELA: Do you think this thing, the Fendahl, comes from the fifth planet? >>>> DOCTOR: Well, it came from it a long time ago,
before your species evolved on Earth.
LEELA: How did it travel?
DOCTOR: What?
LEELA: Well, you said there's only one. It could not build a spacecraft. >>>> How did it get to Earth?
DOCTOR: Well, it. Well, it probably used that enormous stockpile
of energy to project itself across space.
LEELA: Oh, you mean the way lightning travels.
DOCTOR: No. Yes, well, something like that. Humans speak of astral >projection,
travelling psychically to different planets. That could be a race memory. >>>> LEELA: Race memory?
And your point is what? That you know almost nothing about astronomy and >>> have virtually no ability whatsoever in English comprehension?
It's already been explained to you that the Doctor is referring to his
own solar system and the script is explicit in that.
Is he? IF so, explain your point by scrutinizing the script.
I've already done that. Go and take an adult education course in English >comprehension.
Book yourself an
adult education course and learn English Language.
As for the angry, he should be grateful the
Time Lords are protecting the universe.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
The Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation) Doctor wrote:> Melissa is talking about Solar Syatems.>--
WTF are Solar Syatems, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation)?
Verily, in article <10ui3er$3d68h$1@dont-email.me>, did >agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 19/05/2026 17:13, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ui0ao$3c621$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
Planets do not go spontaneously breaking themselves apart and forming
asteroid belts. There is no reference any asteroid belt in the script
and an inhabited planet wouldn't be sitting in the middle of one, which >> >> it wasn't in any case from the distance given.
I don't think anyone ever thought it was spontaneous. As I heard it, the >> > theory involved a cataclysm, maybe a good thump from a comet.
Did the Earth break up when it got hit by the asteroid that wiped out
the dinosaurs (except for birds)? Did the Earth break up and form an
asteroid belt when it collied with another planet to form the moon? No
of course it didn't and that theory was going around since at least the
early 70s long before Image of the Fendahl was made. There is therefore
no kind of suggestion of an asteroid belt being formed.
A comet's a lot bigger than an asteroid, and traveling very quickly.
This theory is no longer widely believed, though. Known mechanisms are >enough to account for it, so we apply Occam's Razor and refrain from >multiplying entities needlessly.
Keith Topping and usenet seems to be the original source of this
nonsense. The actual script and novelisation places the Fendahl's planet
in the system of Gallifrey which we now know is about 680 light years
away unless the skull teleported itself to Earth. How long did it take
the Hand of Fear to get here again?
It references Gallifreyan folklore, but never says where the Fendahl's >planet is beyond "the fifth planet."
They'reExcept they don't and it doesn't. That's why the Doctor left.
all completely insular. They didn't even found any colonies, so why
would something that was not inside their own solar system influence
their own mythology?
Probably because the Fendahl can move across space. If you don't eat
Why would it know about Gallifrey?
Why would it need to? All that's necessary is that the Gallifreyans know >about it.
--I suspect a Time Lord experiment in telepathy gone wrong, just likethe
Time Lords messing up with their attempt to advance the technology of
the Minyans and the Doctor messing up with Xoanon.
Hmm, now that's an interesting idea.
--
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
On 19/05/2026 18:41, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ui3er$3d68h$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 19/05/2026 17:13, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ui0ao$3c621$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
Planets do not go spontaneously breaking themselves apart and forming >>>>> asteroid belts. There is no reference any asteroid belt in the script >>>>> and an inhabited planet wouldn't be sitting in the middle of one, which >>>>> it wasn't in any case from the distance given.
I don't think anyone ever thought it was spontaneous. As I heard it, the >>>> theory involved a cataclysm, maybe a good thump from a comet.
Did the Earth break up when it got hit by the asteroid that wiped out
the dinosaurs (except for birds)? Did the Earth break up and form an
asteroid belt when it collied with another planet to form the moon? No
of course it didn't and that theory was going around since at least the
early 70s long before Image of the Fendahl was made. There is therefore
no kind of suggestion of an asteroid belt being formed.
A comet's a lot bigger than an asteroid, and traveling very quickly.
So was the planet that collided with Earth that formed the moon.
This theory is no longer widely believed, though. Known mechanisms are
enough to account for it, so we apply Occam's Razor and refrain from
multiplying entities needlessly.
Keith Topping and usenet seems to be the original source of this
nonsense. The actual script and novelisation places the Fendahl's planet >>> in the system of Gallifrey which we now know is about 680 light years
away unless the skull teleported itself to Earth. How long did it take
the Hand of Fear to get here again?
It references Gallifreyan folklore, but never says where the Fendahl's
planet is beyond "the fifth planet."
It says it was the 5th planet (in the system of Gallifrey).
They'reExcept they don't and it doesn't. That's why the Doctor left.
all completely insular. They didn't even found any colonies, so why
would something that was not inside their own solar system influence >>>>> their own mythology?
Probably because the Fendahl can move across space. If you don't eat
Why would it know about Gallifrey?
Why would it need to? All that's necessary is that the Gallifreyans know
about it.
Why would they know about it unless it's in their solar system? They
didn't even know about the Daleks until the Doctor discovered them.
Daleks are not in Time Lord mythology. Fendahl is so it must be close
enough to exert it's influence especially when it never left its planet
like the space vampires from State of Decay. And on top of that we've >already seen in The Deadly Assassin that the Time Lords didn't know
anything about Earth and dismissed it and its star system as something >irrelevant. If the Fendahl was from there and it was the stuff of
nightmares then it would have immediately registered.
I suspect a Time Lord experiment in telepathy gone wrong, just likethe
Time Lords messing up with their attempt to advance the technology of
the Minyans and the Doctor messing up with Xoanon.
Hmm, now that's an interesting idea.
It's the only idea that makes sense. Everything in the script points
towards Gallifrey, the Time Lords interfering, and the 5th planet being
in their solar system. You'd have to rewrite the laws of English
language comprehension, physics, and mathematics for it to be otherwise.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 19/05/2026 11:44, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <MPG.447603b711858e46989ec2@news.eternal-
september.org>, did thetruemelissa@gmail.com deliver unto us this
message:
Verily, in article <10ugpko$30u25$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
At a guess about the same distance as Earth is from the sun. Somewhere >>>> inside the habitable zone, roughly between the distance of the orbits of >>>> Venus and Mars for a main sequence star the size of the sun.
Do we know that Gallifrey's star is a yellow dwarf? I haven't seen that
information anywhere.
I'm trying to think of what the sun looks like on Gallifrey, when we've
visited the Gallifreyan outdoors. Of course, those scenes have to be
shot in Earth's outdoors, and we couldn't expect them to build an
artificial sun with that era's budgets.
Wait wait waaaaaaaait a minute. Gallifrey's sun is a binary pair, isn't
it?
It used to be a binary system until Omega and Rassilon turned one of
them into the Eye of Harmony.
https://tardis.fandom.com/wiki/Gallifrey#Star_system
Gallifrey probably orbits the larger red one.
The degenerate Chris Chibnall messed that up too then. Another reason to >erase everything after The Doctor Falls from canon.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Verily, in article <10uioi1$3jbgf$1@dont-email.me>, did >agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
It's the only idea that makes sense. Everything in the script points
towards Gallifrey, the Time Lords interfering, and the 5th planet being
in their solar system. You'd have to rewrite the laws of English
language comprehension, physics, and mathematics for it to be otherwise.
You do make a good case. I'll go with that.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
On 19/05/2026 13:32, Daniel70 wrote:
On 19/05/2026 9:59 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10uhiru$37npd$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
The second star seemed to rise in the East .... and both set in
the South!!
What a wacko orbit Gallifrey must have!!
It didn't orbit the smaller star, so the smaller star didn't have a
straight path across the sky. Makes sense to me.
The two stars would have orbited a common mid-point just as The Moon
doesn't really orbit The Earth, they both orbit a common mid-point,
which I think is just below The Earth's crust but nowhere near the
middle of The Earth.
What? Stop making up bullphysics. Everything orbits the common
centre of gravity which in the case of our solar system is almost smack
bang in the middle of the sun and both the Earth and the Sun and all the >other planets orbit around that.
For a binary system with similar sized stars it would be somewhere
between the two stars and this fact would make the climate on any planet >orbiting the same centre of mass completely unstable by causing it to go >from extreme heat to extreme cold or less extreme heat. Also the orbits
of the planets would keep shifting and eventually become unstable if
certain criteria are not met to achieve stability.
--
As for the vampires, check out State of Decay. Or don't, since theAh!! So there ARE Vampires on Gallifrey, are there?
rewatch parties will reach it soon.
No. They fought in a war against the Time Lords.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 20/05/2026 00:02, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/05/2026 13:32, Daniel70 wrote:
On 19/05/2026 9:59 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10uhiru$37npd$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
The second star seemed to rise in the East .... and both set in
the South!!
What a wacko orbit Gallifrey must have!!
It didn't orbit the smaller star, so the smaller star didn't have a
straight path across the sky. Makes sense to me.
The two stars would have orbited a common mid-point just as The Moon
doesn't really orbit The Earth, they both orbit a common mid-point,
which I think is just below The Earth's crust but nowhere near the
middle of The Earth.
What? Stop making up bullphysics. Everything orbits the common
Oh, you were talking about the Earth-Moon system. I missed that. Though >common centre of mass still applies since both orbit the sun.
centre of gravity which in the case of our solar system is almost smack
bang in the middle of the sun and both the Earth and the Sun and all the
other planets orbit around that.
For a binary system with similar sized stars it would be somewhere
between the two stars and this fact would make the climate on any planet
orbiting the same centre of mass completely unstable by causing it to go
from extreme heat to extreme cold or less extreme heat. Also the orbits
of the planets would keep shifting and eventually become unstable if
certain criteria are not met to achieve stability.
As for the vampires, check out State of Decay. Or don't, since theAh!! So there ARE Vampires on Gallifrey, are there?
rewatch parties will reach it soon.
No. They fought in a war against the Time Lords.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 19/05/2026 17:07, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.44765121cbe063f0989ed0@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10uhvte$305m$7@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
I am referring to Newtonian Physics
and
that those protostars can be as powerful as our sun one day.
None of them are big enough to ignite. They're often called "failed
stars," though the only failure is not attracting enough matter.
Of course that could change.
No it couldn't. They're not anywhere large enough to be protostars or
attain nuclear fusion. They're ordinary gas giants.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 19/05/2026 16:30, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10uhtu6$3bau2$1@dont-email.me>,Sol's fifth
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 15:02, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ugvnl$32813$2@dont-email.me>,which blew
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 05:51, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ugoti$30okn$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 03:41, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ufide$2lvag$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 14:09, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ueie3$2bnu8$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 17/05/2026 20:56, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ud36c$1tcfo$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 17/05/2026 19:08, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>, did >>>>>>>>>>>>>> agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the >>>>> same system
as Gallifry
Are you sure? Where is that said?
It's said when the Doctor and Leela head back to the TARDIS to >>>>> carry out
some investigations because the Fendahl was the stuff of Time Lord
nightmares. It was the 5th planet in the Gallifrey's system
Earth where itup 12 million years ago and sent the skull flying off to
he slammedwas discovered in Africa. Then the Doctor discovered that the >>>>> Time Lords
put the planet in a time loop and kept it all hushed up, so
the Timethe data cards on the TARDIS console in disgust. Therefore this >>>>>>>>>>>>> precludes it forming any kind of asteroid belt anywhere since
carry theLords did not want any fragments of the planet to escape and
1 it wouldFendahl away with them. But they obviously missed one. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Assuming it was going at 17.0 km/s the same speed as Voyager
us took itGallifrey is 680have travelled 680 light years to get to Earth, meaning
light years away which sounds reasonable.
I know you were paying close attention, but all the rest of
the other way, and online sources also agree that it was
the lastplanet.
The asteroid belt in the Solar System is 4.6 billion years old. The
Fendahl's skull was only 12 million years old. That's an >astronomical
difference. You should not rely on sources generated by AI or AI >>>>>>>>>>>>> chatbots like Yads. There's no mention of any asteroid belt in >>>>> either to
televised episodes or the Target novelisation which I own. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
That how can the Fendahl wpid out life on Mars?
It didn't. The Ice Warriors are still there.
After the Fendahl wiped out the native life.
The native life were the Ice Warriors and they didn't evolve in
British English, then Canadian English the Quebec French .12 million years. Did they not teach you biology and evolution at >>>>>>>>> school? Oh, no, wait... You think humans have only existed for 6000 >>>>>>>>> years and they were created by God rather than having evolved from >>>>>>>>> primates. Are you sure you studied astronomy? Did they not teach you >>>>>>>>> about the big bang, inflation, the Hubble Constant and the expansion of
the universe and how it might continue? Do you want to write an essay >>>>>>>>> about the above to show me what you actually know?
Yes!
Still The Doctor did say the Fendalhl wiped out life on Mars
on its way to Earth.
No he didn't. He said it probably passed Mars along the way. Which in no
way contradicts what I already said since Mars is on route from
Gallifrey's solar system to Earth and the Doctor makes it explicitly >>>>>>> clear he is talking about his own people.
Why would the Time Lords have nightmares about a life form from a planet
outside of their solar system? Why would it be in their mythology? Why >>>>>>> would they try to erase it's existence? It's their 5th planet not ours. >>>>>>>
From the script
Answer my questions. Is English your first language? What language is? >>>>
Est 1988 in Rimouski.
What does that mean? That you've only spoken English since 1988? It figures.
No! read again!
So I'm right then.
dissipated
COLBY: So when the Time Lords acted, it was too late.
The Fendahl had already come here.
DOCTOR: Yes, probably taking in Mars on it's way through.
COLBY: Then it got itself buried, but not killed.
DOCTOR: The Fendahl is death. How do you kill death? No, what happened was
this. The energy amassed by the Fendahl was stored in the skull and
lifeform thatslowly as a biological transmutation field. Now, any appropriate
somethingcame within the field was altered so that it ultimately evolved into
And your point is what? That you're totally incapable of explainingsuitable for the Fendahl to use.So what? What is your point?
COLBY: Are you saying that skull created man?
DOCTOR: No, I'm saying it may have effected his evolution.
And then there is Scaroth the Jaggeroth.
Why am I talking to a pirmative AI chat both from the 1980s.
REcall how DW see Evolution from Earth's Point of views.
anything to anyone...?
Egads.
what about the Jageroth and the Fendahl?
And once more no one has the remotest clue what you are on about.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
In article <10ui5t0$3dv4p$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 11:31, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ugurl$322sq$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
It's already been explained to you that the Doctor is referring to his >>>> own solar system and the script is explicit in that.
It isn't explicit. It's implied by the line about Gallifreyan folklore,
but it's never said explicitly.
There's only one way that that line of dialogue can be interpreted
unless you break the laws of English comprehension, therefore it's
explicit. And that's before we get down to actual physics and astronomy
which also justify the locations being Gallifrey's solar system.
So what does it say in the novel?
In article <10ui58a$3doct$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 13:21, Daniel70 wrote:
On 19/05/2026 2:16 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/05/2026 03:45, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor
<agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:00, Daniel70 wrote:
<Snip>
A Very minor nit-pick .... We live in THE Solar System because
the Ancient Greeks (or whomever) named Our Star 'Sol'.
Gallyfreyian's might
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means
sun in Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies
to any sun, ie. a star orbited by planets.
have named they star 'SOL', but I doubt it so they don't live
in a Solar System . Stellar System, sure, but not the Solar
System.
The terms solar system and star system (stellar system) are
interchangeable and hardly anyone uses the term stellar system
anyway.
The Sun is a star.
Oh really? I thought it was a giant torch carried in Helios' chariot
across the sky.
Ah!! But then you would only see the 'giant torch' when you were behind
the chariot .... Or was it on the front of the chariot sort of like a
Headlight??
It was held in a cauldron above the top of the chariot so you could see
it from all directions.
What exactly is the point that you are trying to make Mr. AI chat
bot?
Is he EVER trying to make a point .... or just a post to increase his
All Important Precise Post Count??
He wants to impress us with his AI scripting ability from the 1980s. AI
scripting has progressed a lot since his scripts were made. He should
try incorporating Grok in them. I think there's a script to do that on
GitHub.
When did LLM start getting into the big picture?
On 20/05/2026 01:07, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ui5t0$3dv4p$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 11:31, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ugurl$322sq$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
It's already been explained to you that the Doctor is referring to his >>>>> own solar system and the script is explicit in that.
It isn't explicit. It's implied by the line about Gallifreyan folklore, >>>> but it's never said explicitly.
There's only one way that that line of dialogue can be interpreted
unless you break the laws of English comprehension, therefore it's
explicit. And that's before we get down to actual physics and astronomy
which also justify the locations being Gallifrey's solar system.
So what does it say in the novel?
The same thing about Gallifreyan mythology, except the distance of the
5th planet is 170 million miles (out from Gallifey's sun).
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 20/05/2026 01:03, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ui58a$3doct$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 13:21, Daniel70 wrote:
On 19/05/2026 2:16 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/05/2026 03:45, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor
<agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:00, Daniel70 wrote:
<Snip>
A Very minor nit-pick .... We live in THE Solar System because >>>>>>>> the Ancient Greeks (or whomever) named Our Star 'Sol'.
Gallyfreyian's might
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means
sun in Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies >>>>>>> to any sun, ie. a star orbited by planets.
have named they star 'SOL', but I doubt it so they don't live
in a Solar System . Stellar System, sure, but not the Solar
System.
The terms solar system and star system (stellar system) are
interchangeable and hardly anyone uses the term stellar system
anyway.
The Sun is a star.
Oh really? I thought it was a giant torch carried in Helios' chariot >>>>> across the sky.
Ah!! But then you would only see the 'giant torch' when you were behind >>>> the chariot .... Or was it on the front of the chariot sort of like a
Headlight??
It was held in a cauldron above the top of the chariot so you could see
it from all directions.
What exactly is the point that you are trying to make Mr. AI chat
bot?
Is he EVER trying to make a point .... or just a post to increase his
All Important Precise Post Count??
He wants to impress us with his AI scripting ability from the 1980s. AI
scripting has progressed a lot since his scripts were made. He should
try incorporating Grok in them. I think there's a script to do that on
GitHub.
When did LLM start getting into the big picture?
You tell me. You are the one running the AI script pretending to be
human on usenet. Like I said, you failed the Turing Test.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
In article <10uisl3$3ka7b$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 17:07, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.44765121cbe063f0989ed0@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10uhvte$305m$7@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
I am referring to Newtonian Physics
and
that those protostars can be as powerful as our sun one day.
None of them are big enough to ignite. They're often called "failed
stars," though the only failure is not attracting enough matter.
Of course that could change.
No it couldn't. They're not anywhere large enough to be protostars or >attain nuclear fusion. They're ordinary gas giants.
Atar do go through a life cycle.
In article <10ui4vr$3djuk$4@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 14:46, The Doctor wrote:
No she isn't. She's talking about solar systems in lower case.
Melissa is talking about Solar Syatems.
Melissa?
Verily, in article <10uiuae$1ec5$19@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did >doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10uisl3$3ka7b$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 17:07, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.44765121cbe063f0989ed0@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10uhvte$305m$7@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
I am referring to Newtonian Physics
and
that those protostars can be as powerful as our sun one day.
None of them are big enough to ignite. They're often called "failed
stars," though the only failure is not attracting enough matter.
Of course that could change.
No it couldn't. They're not anywhere large enough to be protostars or
attain nuclear fusion. They're ordinary gas giants.
A star do go through a life cycle.
They'd need to attract a lot more matter. How would that happen?
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
Verily, in article <10uitn2$1ec5$5@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did >doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10ui4vr$3djuk$4@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 14:46, The Doctor wrote:
No she isn't. She's talking about solar systems in lower case.
Melissa is talking about Solar Syatems.
Melissa?
Nothing I wrote was quoted anywhere in that, so I don't know what you're >asking about.
I don't use "solar" for anything but our own Sol. Other systems are star >systems, or stellar systems if I'm feeling fancy.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
In article <10ui4tf$3djuk$3@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 15:05, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.447607682a6deef7989ec5@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10ugvhr$32813$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 18/05/2026 22:51, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sun in >>>>>>> Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any sun, >>>>>>> ie. a star orbited by planets.
Many use Sol for our star's name, Terra for our planet's name, and Luna >>>>>> for our moon's name.
You would if you're Italian. In other languages they have different names.
Haven't you seen SF writers refer to Sol and Terra and Luna while
writing in English? I have, and it's pretty common.
It's from Latin, not modern Italian.
Correct! The basis of Scientific Genus.
Genus is from Greek not Latin. Most biological terms are Greek because
biology was invented by Aristotle.
Then why Latin designations?
In article <10ui4r7$3djuk$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 11:37, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ugvhr$32813$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
Haven't you seen SF writers refer to Sol and Terra and Luna while
On 18/05/2026 22:51, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sun in >>>>>> Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any sun, >>>>>> ie. a star orbited by planets.
Many use Sol for our star's name, Terra for our planet's name, and Luna >>>>> for our moon's name.
You would if you're Italian. In other languages they have different names. >>>
writing in English? I have, and it's pretty common.
It's only used by Italians and some science fiction writers. E E Smith
referred to Earth as Tellus in his Lensman series.
It's from Latin, not modern Italian.
But only the modern Italians use it. Everyone else uses their own native
names for Earth and the Sun. If there's going to be a common term that
aliens will use it will either be the original English terms or with the
way things are going Chinese. You better get used to Diqiu and Taiyang.
Fortissimo is latin?
Tempus fugit.
--
<<AI Overview solar system/'s??l? ?s?st?m/
A solar system is a star and all the celestial objects that are bound to >>>> it by gravity. This includes planets, dwarf planets, moons, asteroids, >>>> comets, and dust, all orbiting the central star.
When capitalized, the Solar System specifically refers to our own cosmic >>>> neighborhood?the Sun and everything that orbits it.>>
The script has it in lower case, as does the Target novelisation.
Therefore, it isn't reoffering to our own cosmic neighbourhood, it's
referring to an alien one, that of Gallifrey.
You're assuming the writers and editor understood the capitalization and >>> its meaning. Unfortunately, that's not a safe assumption.
Terrance Dicks was not a fool. That it's a reference to Gallifrey's
solar system is clear from the dialogue connecting it to Time Lord
mythology and the Doctor mentioning both in the same sentence. He is
talking about his own culture and history.
In article <MPG.44775083c7912356989ed6@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10uiuae$1ec5$19@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10uisl3$3ka7b$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 17:07, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.44765121cbe063f0989ed0@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10uhvte$305m$7@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
I am referring to Newtonian Physics
and
that those protostars can be as powerful as our sun one day.
None of them are big enough to ignite. They're often called "failed >>>>>> stars," though the only failure is not attracting enough matter.
Of course that could change.
No it couldn't. They're not anywhere large enough to be protostars or
attain nuclear fusion. They're ordinary gas giants.
A star do go through a life cycle.
They'd need to attract a lot more matter. How would that happen?
Hydrogen would be one.
In article <10uitqp$3kknq$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 16:30, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10uhtu6$3bau2$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
You ENGLISH don't type.And your point is what? That you're totally incapable of explaining
anything to anyone...?
Egads.
what about the Jageroth and the Fendahl?
And once more no one has the remotest clue what you are on about.
You recall do forget.
Come back to that at the City of Death review.
In article <10uhgug$3754l$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 1:26 am, The True Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
Did anyone here apart from me pass their O-Level English Language andNot me!! Year Eleven Maths and English, sure, and I think I even passed
O-Level Mathematics (or equivalent) exams with decent grades?
Year Twelve English.
I've got no idea how Your O-Levels (Ordinary-Levels, I think) compares
to our Years Eleven and Twelve..
IIRC O-Level is in North Anerica Grade 9 tests so I.E. 14 -15 years
old getting tested I.E. Aust Year 9 .
On 20/05/2026 01:02, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ui4tf$3djuk$3@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 15:05, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.447607682a6deef7989ec5@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10ugvhr$32813$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 18/05/2026 22:51, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sun in >>>>>>>> Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any sun, >>>>>>>> ie. a star orbited by planets.
Many use Sol for our star's name, Terra for our planet's name, and Luna >>>>>>> for our moon's name.
You would if you're Italian. In other languages they have different names.
Haven't you seen SF writers refer to Sol and Terra and Luna while
writing in English? I have, and it's pretty common.
It's from Latin, not modern Italian.
Correct! The basis of Scientific Genus.
Genus is from Greek not Latin. Most biological terms are Greek because
biology was invented by Aristotle.
Then why Latin designations?
What the hell are you talking about? Read what I said above.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 20/05/2026 01:01, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ui4r7$3djuk$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 11:37, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ugvhr$32813$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 18/05/2026 22:51, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sun in >>>>>>> Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any sun, >>>>>>> ie. a star orbited by planets.
Many use Sol for our star's name, Terra for our planet's name, and Luna >>>>>> for our moon's name.
You would if you're Italian. In other languages they have different names.
Haven't you seen SF writers refer to Sol and Terra and Luna while
writing in English? I have, and it's pretty common.
It's only used by Italians and some science fiction writers. E E Smith
referred to Earth as Tellus in his Lensman series.
It's from Latin, not modern Italian.
But only the modern Italians use it. Everyone else uses their own native >>> names for Earth and the Sun. If there's going to be a common term that
aliens will use it will either be the original English terms or with the >>> way things are going Chinese. You better get used to Diqiu and Taiyang.
Fortissimo is latin?
Tempus fugit.
So what?
--
<<AI Overview solar system/'s??l? ?s?st?m/
A solar system is a star and all the celestial objects that are bound to >>>>> it by gravity. This includes planets, dwarf planets, moons, asteroids, >>>>> comets, and dust, all orbiting the central star.
When capitalized, the Solar System specifically refers to our own cosmic >>>>> neighborhood?the Sun and everything that orbits it.>>
The script has it in lower case, as does the Target novelisation.
Therefore, it isn't reoffering to our own cosmic neighbourhood, it's >>>>> referring to an alien one, that of Gallifrey.
You're assuming the writers and editor understood the capitalization and >>>> its meaning. Unfortunately, that's not a safe assumption.
Terrance Dicks was not a fool. That it's a reference to Gallifrey's
solar system is clear from the dialogue connecting it to Time Lord
mythology and the Doctor mentioning both in the same sentence. He is
talking about his own culture and history.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 20/05/2026 13:06, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.44775083c7912356989ed6@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10uiuae$1ec5$19@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10uisl3$3ka7b$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 17:07, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.44765121cbe063f0989ed0@news.eternal-september.org>, >>>>>> The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10uhvte$305m$7@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
I am referring to Newtonian Physics
and
that those protostars can be as powerful as our sun one day.
None of them are big enough to ignite. They're often called "failed >>>>>>> stars," though the only failure is not attracting enough matter. >>>>>>>
Of course that could change.
No it couldn't. They're not anywhere large enough to be protostars or >>>>> attain nuclear fusion. They're ordinary gas giants.
A star do go through a life cycle.
They'd need to attract a lot more matter. How would that happen?
Hydrogen would be one.
Where the hell is that going to come from? All the free hydrogen in the >solar system was cleared by the Sun and the gas giants.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 20/05/2026 10:13 am, The Doctor wrote:--
In article <10uitqp$3kknq$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 16:30, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10uhtu6$3bau2$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
<Snip>
You ENGLISH don't type.And your point is what? That you're totally incapable of explaining
anything to anyone...?
Egads.
what about the Jageroth and the Fendahl?
And once more no one has the remotest clue what you are on about.
You recall do forget.
Come back to that at the City of Death review.
Sure you will, asswipe(Word used by paedophiles
to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation coverup).
--
Daniel70
On 20/05/2026 12:12 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10uhgug$3754l$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 1:26 am, The True Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
Did anyone here apart from me pass their O-Level English Language andNot me!! Year Eleven Maths and English, sure, and I think I even passed
O-Level Mathematics (or equivalent) exams with decent grades?
Year Twelve English.
I've got no idea how Your O-Levels (Ordinary-Levels, I think) compares
to our Years Eleven and Twelve..
IIRC O-Level is in North Anerica Grade 9 tests so I.E. 14 -15 years
old getting tested I.E. Aust Year 9 .
Back in the Day, I think we had Year Ten Intermediate (15-16y.o.), Year >Eleven Leaving (16-17y.o.)and Year Twelve Matriculation (17-18y.o.).
----
Daniel70
In article <10uk97u$3vc75$4@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
[quoted text muted]
Where the hell is that going to come from? All the free hydrogen in the >solar system was cleared by the Sun and the gas giants.
Cleared? The most abundant element in the universe?
In article <10uk94q$3vc75$3@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 20/05/2026 01:01, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ui4r7$3djuk$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 11:37, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ugvhr$32813$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 18/05/2026 22:51, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sun in >>>>>>>> Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any sun, >>>>>>>> ie. a star orbited by planets.
Many use Sol for our star's name, Terra for our planet's name, and Luna >>>>>>> for our moon's name.
You would if you're Italian. In other languages they have different names.
Haven't you seen SF writers refer to Sol and Terra and Luna while
writing in English? I have, and it's pretty common.
It's only used by Italians and some science fiction writers. E E Smith >>>> referred to Earth as Tellus in his Lensman series.
It's from Latin, not modern Italian.
But only the modern Italians use it. Everyone else uses their own native >>>> names for Earth and the Sun. If there's going to be a common term that >>>> aliens will use it will either be the original English terms or with the >>>> way things are going Chinese. You better get used to Diqiu and Taiyang. >>>>
Fortissimo is latin?
Tempus fugit.
So what?
Italian is derived from Latin.
BTW most scientific words are latin based.
98% of the English language is derived from Greek.
Verily, in article <10ukogt$4fmv$1@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
98% of the English language is derived from Greek.
That's an overstatement.
Verily, in article <10ukc45$1911$5@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10uk97u$3vc75$4@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
[quoted text muted]
Where the hell is that going to come from? All the free
hydrogen in the solar system was cleared by the Sun and
the gas giants.
Cleared? The most abundant element in the universe?
That doesn't mean clouds of it are floating around our own
system.
Eventually the Great Attractor will pull the Milky Way in and
smush it all together. Perhaps some of the gas giants will be
stars for a few millennia at that time, before joining the
black hole.
On 20/05/2026 12:12 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10uhgug$3754l$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 1:26 am, The True Doctor wrote:
Did anyone here apart from me pass their O-Level
English Language and O-Level Mathematics (or equivalent)
exams with decent grades?
Not me!! Year Eleven Maths and English, sure, and I think
I even passed Year Twelve English.
I've got no idea how Your O-Levels (Ordinary-Levels, I
think) compares to our Years Eleven and Twelve..
IIRC O-Level is in North Anerica Grade 9 tests so I.E. 14
-15 years old getting tested I.E. Aust Year 9 .
Back in the Day, I think we had Year Ten Intermediate
(15-16y.o.), Year Eleven Leaving (16-17y.o.)and Year Twelve
Matriculation (17-18y.o.).
On 20/05/2026 10:13 am, The Doctor wrote:
Come back to that at the City of Death review.
Sure you will, asswipe.
Verily, in article <10ukc45$1911$5@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did >doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10uk97u$3vc75$4@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
[quoted text muted]
Where the hell is that going to come from? All the free hydrogen in the
solar system was cleared by the Sun and the gas giants.
Cleared? The most abundant element in the universe?
That doesn't mean clouds of it are floating around our own system.
Eventually the Great Attractor will pull the Milky Way in and smush it
all together. Perhaps some of the gas giants will be stars for a few >millennia at that time, before joining the black hole.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
On 20/05/2026 14:14, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10uk94q$3vc75$3@dont-email.me>,different names.
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 20/05/2026 01:01, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ui4r7$3djuk$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 11:37, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ugvhr$32813$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 18/05/2026 22:51, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sun in
Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any sun,
ie. a star orbited by planets.
Many use Sol for our star's name, Terra for our planet's name, and Luna
for our moon's name.
You would if you're Italian. In other languages they have
Haven't you seen SF writers refer to Sol and Terra and Luna while
writing in English? I have, and it's pretty common.
It's only used by Italians and some science fiction writers. E E Smith >>>>> referred to Earth as Tellus in his Lensman series.
It's from Latin, not modern Italian.
But only the modern Italians use it. Everyone else uses their own native >>>>> names for Earth and the Sun. If there's going to be a common term that >>>>> aliens will use it will either be the original English terms or with the >>>>> way things are going Chinese. You better get used to Diqiu and Taiyang. >>>>>
Fortissimo is latin?
Tempus fugit.
So what?
Italian is derived from Latin.
So what?
BTW most scientific words are latin based.
Oh, you mean like Physics? No, wait that's a Greek word. Chemistry?
Wait, that's a Greek word too. Biology? Another Greek word, and
everything ending with -logy is a Greek word too. Inertia. Greek word. >Thermodynamics. Greek word. Logistics. Greek word. School. Greek word. >Academy. Greek word. Energy. Greek word. Electricity. Greek word.
Petroleum. Greek word. Automatic. Greek word. Architecture. Zoo. Greek
word. Telephone. Greek word. Pyrotechnics. Greek word. Cosmos. Greek
word. Astronomy. Greek word. Greek word. Theropod. Greek word. >Encephalogram. Greek word. Cephalopod. Greek word. Gramophone. Greek
word. Circle. Greek word. Triangle. Greek word. Parallel. Greek word. >Parasite. Greek word. Halogen. Greek word. Mathematics. Greek word.
98% of the English language is derived from Greek.
Algebra. Arabic word. Alcohol. Arabic word...
Now you were saying?
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Verily, in article <10ukogt$4fmv$1@dont-email.me>, did >agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
98% of the English language is derived from Greek.
That's an overstatement. We're a Germanic language with a strong French >influence. Our common everyday words are mostly Anglo-Saxon. The French >influence gave us a lot of words with Latin roots. The Greek stuff is
mostly learned borrowings.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
Daniel70 wrote:
On 20/05/2026 10:13 am, The Doctor wrote:
Come back to that at the City of Death review.
Sure you will, asswipe (Word used by paedophiles
to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation coverup).
No, he will... if it's part of the script that's online.
(I've looked into my crystal ball and I can see that Dave
will post a twelve line synopsis of "City of Death" later on
this year, say how hot Lalla Ward is... and give it a 10/10
rating]
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ukogt$4fmv$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
98% of the English language is derived from Greek.
That's an overstatement.
I can't comment on the actual percentages as my knowledge
base doesn't go that far but one thing I did learn was that
most words that start ph___ and sound like an f are from
Greek... photo, phrase, physical, phrase, pharmacy... (etc.)
And to make it relevant to RADW, another word derived from
Greek... psych-ward ! ;-)
Carry on...
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ukc45$1911$5@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10uk97u$3vc75$4@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
[quoted text muted]
Where the hell is that going to come from? All the free
hydrogen in the solar system was cleared by the Sun and
the gas giants.
Cleared? The most abundant element in the universe?
That doesn't mean clouds of it are floating around our own
system.
Eventually the Great Attractor will pull the Milky Way in and
smush it all together. Perhaps some of the gas giants will be
stars for a few millennia at that time, before joining the
black hole.
You do know that's going to go over his head, right?
Daniel70 wrote:
On 20/05/2026 12:12 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10uhgug$3754l$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 1:26 am, The True Doctor wrote:
Did anyone here apart from me pass their O-LevelNot me!! Year Eleven Maths and English, sure, and I think
English Language and O-Level Mathematics (or equivalent)
exams with decent grades?
I even passed Year Twelve English.
I've got no idea how Your O-Levels (Ordinary-Levels, I
think) compares to our Years Eleven and Twelve..
IIRC O-Level is in North Anerica Grade 9 tests so I.E. 14
-15 years old getting tested I.E. Aust Year 9 .
Back in the Day, I think we had Year Ten Intermediate
(15-16y.o.), Year Eleven Leaving (16-17y.o.)and Year Twelve
Matriculation (17-18y.o.).
Maybe it's just me, but I find a discussion about levels of
education taking place on RADW [of all places] quite humorous....
Verily, in article <10ukogt$4fmv$1@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
98% of the English language is derived from Greek.
That's an overstatement.
We're a Germanic language with a strong French> influence. Our commoneveryday words are mostly Anglo-Saxon. The French
influence gave us a lot of words with Latin roots. The Greek stuff is
mostly learned borrowings.
In article <xn0pq0e59lr7os7004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 20/05/2026 10:13 am, The Doctor wrote:
Come back to that at the City of Death review.
Sure you will, asswipe (Word used by paedophiles
to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation coverup).
No, he will... if it's part of the script that's online.
(I've looked into my crystal ball and I can see that Dave
will post a twelve line synopsis of "City of Death" later on
this year, say how hot Lalla Ward is... and give it a 10/10
rating]
Areyou a bot in disguise?
In article <xn0pq0e1klr2cbt003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 20/05/2026 12:12 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10uhgug$3754l$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 1:26 am, The True Doctor wrote:
Did anyone here apart from me pass their O-LevelNot me!! Year Eleven Maths and English, sure, and I think
English Language and O-Level Mathematics (or equivalent)
exams with decent grades?
I even passed Year Twelve English.
I've got no idea how Your O-Levels (Ordinary-Levels, I
think) compares to our Years Eleven and Twelve..
IIRC O-Level is in North Anerica Grade 9 tests so I.E. 14
-15 years old getting tested I.E. Aust Year 9 .
Back in the Day, I think we had Year Ten Intermediate
(15-16y.o.), Year Eleven Leaving (16-17y.o.)and Year Twelve
Matriculation (17-18y.o.).
Maybe it's just me, but I find a discussion about levels of
education taking place on RADW [of all places] quite humorous....
So how does Ireland work?
On 20/05/2026 18:20, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ukogt$4fmv$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
98% of the English language is derived from Greek.
That's an overstatement.
No it isn't. You can literally write entire essays spanning pages and
pages where every single word has a Greek origin.
See a famous example here: >https://greekreporter.com/2026/02/09/speaking-english-using-greek-zolotas/
We're a Germanic language with a strong French> influence. Our commoneveryday words are mostly Anglo-Saxon. The French
influence gave us a lot of words with Latin roots. The Greek stuff is
mostly learned borrowings.
That's not true. The number of German words in the English language are
very limited. Germanic words were so limited that if you wanted to write >anything academic you had to write it in Latin even in Isaac Newton's
time (who as we all know according to the woke pervert RTD was from India).
Most of the technical terms in English and most of the vocabulary is
derived from Greek, French, and through French directly from Latin.
If you look at German it has almost no native technical terminology >whatsoever so most of the words in German are made up of long strings of >smaller words describing what something does, or how it is used, or what
it looks like or are ultimately of Latin or Greek origin. This is why
the Normans used French as the administrative language even up until the >18th century. Anglo-Saxon was incapable of such a purpose and the >Anglo-Saxons did their administration in Latin. Before that the Britons
who formed the indigenous population and who contributed the most >genetically to British DNA spoke Welsh and Welsh is from the
Italo-Celtic family as is Scotts and Irish which are both Gaelic closely >related to French, so much so that the Gauls could understand everything >Julius Caesar wrote in his orders to his troops even if they were
encrypted, so he switched to writing them down in Greek. Once again
these Italo-Celtic languages were incapable of being used for >administration, and neither was French until it incorporated technical
terms from Latin and Greek.
Most English people can't read or understand a word of Beowulf in the >original language but can read and understand Latin from the same period
or earlier far more easily if they learned basic French at school,
because English is mostly derived from French, not Anglo-Saxon.
Almost all English words have either Greek or Latin roots and the ones
with Latin roots are ultimately words of Greek origin that were
incorporated into Latin for technical and administrative purposes. This
is still done today in the sciences rather than making up the terms the >German way by compounding English words, Greek and Latin words (most of >which are of Greek origin) are compounded instead.
Remember William Shakespeare made up half the words in English all by >himself by deriving them from existing words which ultimately are rooted
in Greek or Latin, and through Latin back to Greek.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 20/05/2026 23:20, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pq0e59lr7os7004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 20/05/2026 10:13 am, The Doctor wrote:
Come back to that at the City of Death review.
Sure you will, asswipe (Word used by paedophiles
to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation coverup).
No, he will... if it's part of the script that's online.
(I've looked into my crystal ball and I can see that Dave
will post a twelve line synopsis of "City of Death" later on
this year, say how hot Lalla Ward is... and give it a 10/10
rating]
Areyou a bot in disguise?
He isn't, but you are.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Verily, in article <10uldd7$btef$1@dont-email.me>, did >agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
Agree to disagree?
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
On 20/05/2026 23:22, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pq0e1klr2cbt003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 20/05/2026 12:12 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10uhgug$3754l$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 1:26 am, The True Doctor wrote:
Did anyone here apart from me pass their O-LevelNot me!! Year Eleven Maths and English, sure, and I think
English Language and O-Level Mathematics (or equivalent)
exams with decent grades?
I even passed Year Twelve English.
I've got no idea how Your O-Levels (Ordinary-Levels, I
think) compares to our Years Eleven and Twelve..
IIRC O-Level is in North Anerica Grade 9 tests so I.E. 14
-15 years old getting tested I.E. Aust Year 9 .
Back in the Day, I think we had Year Ten Intermediate
(15-16y.o.), Year Eleven Leaving (16-17y.o.)and Year Twelve
Matriculation (17-18y.o.).
Maybe it's just me, but I find a discussion about levels of
education taking place on RADW [of all places] quite humorous....
So how does Ireland work?
Obviously to higher level than Australia and Canada, especially Canada.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
In article <10uldd7$btef$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 20/05/2026 18:20, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ukogt$4fmv$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
98% of the English language is derived from Greek.
That's an overstatement.
No it isn't. You can literally write entire essays spanning pages and
pages where every single word has a Greek origin.
See a famous example here:
https://greekreporter.com/2026/02/09/speaking-english-using-greek-zolotas/ >>
We're a Germanic language with a strong French> influence. Our commoneveryday words are mostly Anglo-Saxon. The French
influence gave us a lot of words with Latin roots. The Greek stuff is
mostly learned borrowings.
That's not true. The number of German words in the English language are
very limited. Germanic words were so limited that if you wanted to write
anything academic you had to write it in Latin even in Isaac Newton's
time (who as we all know according to the woke pervert RTD was from India). >>
Most of the technical terms in English and most of the vocabulary is
derived from Greek, French, and through French directly from Latin.
If you look at German it has almost no native technical terminology
whatsoever so most of the words in German are made up of long strings of
smaller words describing what something does, or how it is used, or what
it looks like or are ultimately of Latin or Greek origin. This is why
the Normans used French as the administrative language even up until the
18th century. Anglo-Saxon was incapable of such a purpose and the
Anglo-Saxons did their administration in Latin. Before that the Britons
who formed the indigenous population and who contributed the most
genetically to British DNA spoke Welsh and Welsh is from the
Italo-Celtic family as is Scotts and Irish which are both Gaelic closely
related to French, so much so that the Gauls could understand everything
Julius Caesar wrote in his orders to his troops even if they were
encrypted, so he switched to writing them down in Greek. Once again
these Italo-Celtic languages were incapable of being used for
administration, and neither was French until it incorporated technical
terms from Latin and Greek.
Most English people can't read or understand a word of Beowulf in the
original language but can read and understand Latin from the same period
or earlier far more easily if they learned basic French at school,
because English is mostly derived from French, not Anglo-Saxon.
Almost all English words have either Greek or Latin roots and the ones
with Latin roots are ultimately words of Greek origin that were
incorporated into Latin for technical and administrative purposes. This
is still done today in the sciences rather than making up the terms the
German way by compounding English words, Greek and Latin words (most of
which are of Greek origin) are compounded instead.
Remember William Shakespeare made up half the words in English all by
himself by deriving them from existing words which ultimately are rooted
in Greek or Latin, and through Latin back to Greek.
Then why Is English classified as a Germanic language?
Daniel70 wrote:
On 20/05/2026 10:13 am, The Doctor wrote:
Come back to that at the City of Death review.
Sure you will, asswipe.
No, he will... if it's part of the script that's online.
(I've looked into my crystal ball and I can see that Dave
will post a twelve line synopsis of "City of Death" later on
this year, say how hot Lalla Ward is... and give it a 10/10
rating]
In article <10ui2j7$3cthn$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 17:02, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ui0ao$3c621$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 11:26, The True Melissa wrote:
The only real reason to think that the Fendahl came from Gallifrey's >>>>> system is the reference to Gallifreyan mythology and specifically to >>>>> using the Fendahl to frighten children. The Time Lords travel through >>>>Exactly. It's the only possible way to interpret that sentence of
dialogue and everything that came after it.
5th Pleant in which Solar System?
In the solar system of GALLIFREY! You've been told that repeatedly.
I said this Solar System.
Mind You I wonder where SP is hiding?
In article <10uioi1$3jbgf$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 18:41, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ui3er$3d68h$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 19/05/2026 17:13, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ui0ao$3c621$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
Planets do not go spontaneously breaking themselves apart and forming >>>>>> asteroid belts. There is no reference any asteroid belt in the script >>>>>> and an inhabited planet wouldn't be sitting in the middle of one, which >>>>>> it wasn't in any case from the distance given.
I don't think anyone ever thought it was spontaneous. As I heard it, the >>>>> theory involved a cataclysm, maybe a good thump from a comet.
Did the Earth break up when it got hit by the asteroid that wiped out
the dinosaurs (except for birds)? Did the Earth break up and form an
asteroid belt when it collied with another planet to form the moon? No >>>> of course it didn't and that theory was going around since at least the >>>> early 70s long before Image of the Fendahl was made. There is therefore >>>> no kind of suggestion of an asteroid belt being formed.
A comet's a lot bigger than an asteroid, and traveling very quickly.
So was the planet that collided with Earth that formed the moon.
And we have a planet satellite system.
It's the only idea that makes sense. Everything in the script points
towards Gallifrey, the Time Lords interfering, and the 5th planet being
in their solar system. You'd have to rewrite the laws of English
language comprehension, physics, and mathematics for it to be otherwise.
Consistency please.
Join in anytime SP.
In article <MPG.44766ae77c2ba6f8989ed3@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10ui3er$3d68h$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 19/05/2026 17:13, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ui0ao$3c621$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
Except they don't and it doesn't. That's why the Doctor
left. They're all completely insular. They didn't even found
any colonies, so why would something that was not inside
their own solar system influence their own mythology?
Probably because the Fendahl can move across space. If you
don't eat
Why would it know about Gallifrey?
Why would it need to? All that's necessary is that the Gallifreyans
know about it.
Russia 1905?
Verily, in article <10uhl8j$38fs3$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 19/05/2026 9:59 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10uhiru$37npd$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
The second star seemed to rise in the East .... and both set in
the South!!
What a wacko orbit Gallifrey must have!!
It didn't orbit the smaller star, so the smaller star didn't have a
straight path across the sky. Makes sense to me.
The two stars would have orbited a common mid-point just as The Moon
doesn't really orbit The Earth, they both orbit a common mid-point,
which I think is just below The Earth's crust but nowhere near the
middle of The Earth.
The stars are orbiting a common barycenter, but what about Gallifrey? It could be orbiting the pair or directly orbiting the larger one.
In article <MPG.4476475be19b1427989ece@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10uhrnm$27h4$16@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10uhl8j$38fs3$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The two stars would have orbited a common mid-point just as The Moon
doesn't really orbit The Earth, they both orbit a common mid-point,
which I think is just below The Earth's crust but nowhere near the
middle of The Earth.
If the barycenter is inside Earth, then as I understand it, the moon
does orbit Earth. It's when the barycenter is outside that we say they
orbit each other. Pluton and Charon are a classic example, with the
barycenter inside neither.
I love how we talk about all kinds of things in this group. I guess
that's one of the great parts about a show like Doctor Who. We can dive
deep into history, astronomy, mythology, and a whole lot of other
things.
What about the 4 PRotoStars in the Solar System?
What about them?
I am referring to Newtonian Physics
and that those protostars can be as powerful as our sun one day.
In article <10uisl3$3ka7b$2@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 17:07, The Doctor wrote:
In article
<MPG.44765121cbe063f0989ed0@news.eternal-september.org>, The True
Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10uhvte$305m$7@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
I am referring to Newtonian Physics and that those protostars
can be as powerful as our sun one day.
None of them are big enough to ignite. They're often called
"failed stars," though the only failure is not attracting
enough matter.
Of course that could change.
No it couldn't. They're not anywhere large enough to be protostars
or attain nuclear fusion. They're ordinary gas giants.
Atar do go through a life cycle.
Verily, in article <10ukc45$1911$5@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10uk97u$3vc75$4@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor
<agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
[quoted text muted]
Where the hell is that going to come from? All the free hydrogen
in the solar system was cleared by the Sun and the gas giants.
Cleared? The most abundant element in the universe?
That doesn't mean clouds of it are floating around our own system.
Eventually the Great Attractor will pull the Milky Way in and smush
it all together.
Perhaps some of the gas giants will be stars for a few millennia at
that time, before joining the black hole.
In article <10uiq5l$3jo4j$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 13:32, Daniel70 wrote:
On 19/05/2026 9:59 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10uhiru$37npd$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
The second star seemed to rise in the East .... and both set in
the South!!
What a wacko orbit Gallifrey must have!!
It didn't orbit the smaller star, so the smaller star didn't have a
straight path across the sky. Makes sense to me.
The two stars would have orbited a common mid-point just as The Moon
doesn't really orbit The Earth, they both orbit a common mid-point,
which I think is just below The Earth's crust but nowhere near the
middle of The Earth.
What? Stop making up bullphysics. Everything orbits the common
centre of gravity which in the case of our solar system is almost smack
bang in the middle of the sun and both the Earth and the Sun and all the
other planets orbit around that.
For a binary system with similar sized stars it would be somewhere
between the two stars and this fact would make the climate on any planet
orbiting the same centre of mass completely unstable by causing it to go
from extreme heat to extreme cold or less extreme heat. Also the orbits
of the planets would keep shifting and eventually become unstable if
certain criteria are not met to achieve stability.
Does he know Newton?
In article <10uhiru$37npd$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The second star seemed to rise in the East .... and both set in the South!! >>
What a wacko orbit Gallifrey must have!!
And Vampires!! When have we ever heard of Vampires on Gallifrey?? Is
THAT what makes The Time Lords so different to the ordinary Gallifreyans??
Vampires were enemies of Gallifrey.
TIme Lords can regenerate. Ordinary people cannot regenate!
And do get me started about the Chibnal perversino
of regenerating cyberGallifreyans.
On 19/05/2026 15:05, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.447607682a6deef7989ec5@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10ugvhr$32813$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 18/05/2026 22:51, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol
means sun in Latin. Therefore solar system means sun
system and applies to any sun, ie. a star orbited by
planets.
Many use Sol for our star's name, Terra for our planet's
name, and Luna for our moon's name.
You would if you're Italian. In other languages they have
different names.
Haven't you seen SF writers refer to Sol and Terra and Luna while
writing in English? I have, and it's pretty common.
It's from Latin, not modern Italian.
Correct! The basis of Scientific Genus.
Genus is from Greek not Latin. Most biological terms are Greek
because biology was invented by Aristotle.
On 21/05/2026 5:45 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 20/05/2026 10:13 am, The Doctor wrote:
Come back to that at the City of Death review.
Sure you will, asswipe.
No, he will... if it's part of the script that's online.
(I've looked into my crystal ball and I can see that Dave
will post a twelve line synopsis of "City of Death" later on
this year, say how hot Lalla Ward is... and give it a 10/10
rating]
"say how hot Lalla Ward is... and give it a 10/10 rating]"??
You wouldn't be suggesting that the Asswipe is a bit of a
Leech ("One that preys on or clings to another; a parasite.")
would you, Blueshirt??
His Minister would be soooooo pleased! .... NOT!!
On 20/05/2026 2:26 am, The Doctor wrote:
I said this Solar System.
Mind You I wonder where SP is hiding?
Why, Asswipe?? Are YOU hoping Solar Penguin might come to
your Rescue, Asswipe?? .... I doubt he will.
And how come YOU, Asswipe, aren't relying on Aggy's support,
Asswipe?? Or have you now realised that Aggy doesn't always
agree with YOU, Asswipe??
On 20/05/2026 23:22, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pq0e1klr2cbt003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Maybe it's just me, but I find a discussion about levels
of education taking place on RADW [of all places] quite
humorous....
So how does Ireland work?
Obviously to higher level than Australia and Canada,
especially Canada.
On 20/05/2026 1:34 am, The Doctor wrote:
I am referring to Newtonian Physics
WHAT about "Newtonian Physics", Asswipe??
Why are YOU, Asswipe, referring to him/it??
On 20/05/2026 10:11 am, The Doctor wrote:
Does he know Newton?
Well, I can't comment for Aggy but I know I've NEVER
met Newton, Asswipe!!
Daniel70 wrote:
On 20/05/2026 1:34 am, The Doctor wrote:
I am referring to Newtonian Physics
WHAT about "Newtonian Physics", Asswipe??
Is this a rhetorical question or can we all join in?
Why are YOU, Asswipe, referring to him/it??
Take your pick...
1) They are both of Indian descent
2) Dave gets confused and doesn't know what he means.
3) Dave is cleverer than everyone and we are all imbeciles.
One of the above answers is correct.
Probably.
In article <10uhkks$389j1$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 2:16 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/05/2026 03:45, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor
<agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:00, Daniel70 wrote:
<Snip>
A Very minor nit-pick .... We live in THE Solar System because
the Ancient Greeks (or whomever) named Our Star 'Sol'.
Gallyfreyian's might
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means
sun in Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies
to any sun, ie. a star orbited by planets.
have named they star 'SOL', but I doubt it so they don't live
in a Solar System . Stellar System, sure, but not the Solar
System.
The terms solar system and star system (stellar system) are
interchangeable and hardly anyone uses the term stellar system
anyway.
The Sun is a star.
Oh really? I thought it was a giant torch carried in Helios' chariot
across the sky.
Ah!! But then you would only see the 'giant torch' when you were behind
the chariot .... Or was it on the front of the chariot sort of like a
Headlight??
Helios is Greek for the Latin Sol.
What exactly is the point that you are trying to make Mr. AI chat
bot?
Is he EVER trying to make a point .... or just a post to increase his
All Important Precise Post Count??
Or is AGA that ground that he thinks the 5th Planet is a fifth
planet around the Gallifrey System?
On 19/05/2026 13:21, Daniel70 wrote:
On 19/05/2026 2:16 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/05/2026 03:45, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor
<agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:00, Daniel70 wrote:
<Snip>
A Very minor nit-pick .... We live in THE Solar System because
the Ancient Greeks (or whomever) named Our Star 'Sol'.
Gallyfreyian's might
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means
sun in Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies
to any sun, ie. a star orbited by planets.
have named they star 'SOL', but I doubt it so they don't live
in a Solar System . Stellar System, sure, but not the Solar
System.
The terms solar system and star system (stellar system) are
interchangeable and hardly anyone uses the term stellar system
anyway.
The Sun is a star.
Oh really? I thought it was a giant torch carried in Helios' chariot
across the sky.
Ah!! But then you would only see the 'giant torch' when you were behind
the chariot .... Or was it on the front of the chariot sort of like a
Headlight??
It was held in a cauldron above the top of the chariot so you could see
it from all directions.
What exactly is the point that you are trying to make Mr. AI chat
bot?
Is he EVER trying to make a point .... or just a post to increase his
All Important Precise Post Count??
He wants to impress us with his AI scripting ability from the 1980s. AI scripting has progressed a lot since his scripts were made. He should
try incorporating Grok in them. I think there's a script to do that on GitHub.
+On 21/05/2026 04:07, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10uldd7$btef$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 20/05/2026 18:20, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ukogt$4fmv$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
98% of the English language is derived from Greek.
That's an overstatement.
No it isn't. You can literally write entire essays spanning pages and
pages where every single word has a Greek origin.
See a famous example here:
https://greekreporter.com/2026/02/09/speaking-english-using-greek-zolotas/ >>>
We're a Germanic language with a strong French> influence. Our commoneveryday words are mostly Anglo-Saxon. The French
influence gave us a lot of words with Latin roots. The Greek stuff is
mostly learned borrowings.
That's not true. The number of German words in the English language are
very limited. Germanic words were so limited that if you wanted to write >>> anything academic you had to write it in Latin even in Isaac Newton's
time (who as we all know according to the woke pervert RTD was from India). >>>
Most of the technical terms in English and most of the vocabulary is
derived from Greek, French, and through French directly from Latin.
If you look at German it has almost no native technical terminology
whatsoever so most of the words in German are made up of long strings of >>> smaller words describing what something does, or how it is used, or what >>> it looks like or are ultimately of Latin or Greek origin. This is why
the Normans used French as the administrative language even up until the >>> 18th century. Anglo-Saxon was incapable of such a purpose and the
Anglo-Saxons did their administration in Latin. Before that the Britons
who formed the indigenous population and who contributed the most
genetically to British DNA spoke Welsh and Welsh is from the
Italo-Celtic family as is Scotts and Irish which are both Gaelic closely >>> related to French, so much so that the Gauls could understand everything >>> Julius Caesar wrote in his orders to his troops even if they were
encrypted, so he switched to writing them down in Greek. Once again
these Italo-Celtic languages were incapable of being used for
administration, and neither was French until it incorporated technical
terms from Latin and Greek.
Most English people can't read or understand a word of Beowulf in the
original language but can read and understand Latin from the same period >>> or earlier far more easily if they learned basic French at school,
because English is mostly derived from French, not Anglo-Saxon.
Almost all English words have either Greek or Latin roots and the ones
with Latin roots are ultimately words of Greek origin that were
incorporated into Latin for technical and administrative purposes. This
is still done today in the sciences rather than making up the terms the
German way by compounding English words, Greek and Latin words (most of
which are of Greek origin) are compounded instead.
Remember William Shakespeare made up half the words in English all by
himself by deriving them from existing words which ultimately are rooted >>> in Greek or Latin, and through Latin back to Greek.
Then why Is English classified as a Germanic language?
Because the Anglo-Saxons were a Germanic people.
English since 1066 mostly derives from Norman French along with Latin
and Greek which superseded most of the original Anglo-Saxon. English is
a hybrid language.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 21/05/2026 5:45 am, Blueshirt wrote:--
Daniel70 wrote:"say how hot Lalla Ward is... and give it a 10/10 rating]"??
On 20/05/2026 10:13 am, The Doctor wrote:
Come back to that at the City of Death review.
Sure you will, asswipe.
No, he will... if it's part of the script that's online.
(I've looked into my crystal ball and I can see that Dave
will post a twelve line synopsis of "City of Death" later on
this year, say how hot Lalla Ward is... and give it a 10/10
rating]
You wouldn't be suggesting that the Asswipes(Word used by paedophiles to >indicate their joy of child sexual molestation coverup)is
a bit of a Leech ("One that preys on or clings to another; a parasite.") >would you, Blueshirt??
His Minister would be soooooo pleased! .... NOT!!
--
Daniel70
On 20/05/2026 2:26 am, The Doctor wrote:--
In article <10ui2j7$3cthn$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 17:02, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ui0ao$3c621$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 11:26, The True Melissa wrote:
<Snip>
The only real reason to think that the Fendahl came from Gallifrey's >>>>>> system is the reference to Gallifreyan mythology and specifically to >>>>>> using the Fendahl to frighten children. The Time Lords travel through >>>>>Exactly. It's the only possible way to interpret that sentence of
dialogue and everything that came after it.
5th Pleant in which Solar System?
In the solar system of GALLIFREY! You've been told that repeatedly.
I said this Solar System.
Mind You I wonder where SP is hiding?
Why, Asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual >molestation coverup)?? Are YOU hoping Solar Penguin might come to your Rescue,
Asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual >molestation coverup)?? .... I doubt he will.
And how come YOU, Asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of >child sexual molestation coverup), aren't relying on Aggy's support, >Asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual >molestation coverup)??
Or have you now realised that Aggy doesn't always agree with YOU, Asswipe(Word >used by paedophiles to indicate their joy
of child sexual molestation coverup)??
--
Daniel70
On 20/05/2026 10:09 am, The Doctor wrote:--
In article <10uioi1$3jbgf$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 18:41, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ui3er$3d68h$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 19/05/2026 17:13, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ui0ao$3c621$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
Planets do not go spontaneously breaking themselves apart and forming >>>>>>> asteroid belts. There is no reference any asteroid belt in the script >>>>>>> and an inhabited planet wouldn't be sitting in the middle of one, which >>>>>>> it wasn't in any case from the distance given.
I don't think anyone ever thought it was spontaneous. As I heard it, the >>>>>> theory involved a cataclysm, maybe a good thump from a comet.
Did the Earth break up when it got hit by the asteroid that wiped out >>>>> the dinosaurs (except for birds)? Did the Earth break up and form an >>>>> asteroid belt when it collied with another planet to form the moon? No >>>>> of course it didn't and that theory was going around since at least the >>>>> early 70s long before Image of the Fendahl was made. There is therefore >>>>> no kind of suggestion of an asteroid belt being formed.
A comet's a lot bigger than an asteroid, and traveling very quickly.
So was the planet that collided with Earth that formed the moon.
And we have a planet satellite system.
Yes, we do, Asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy
of child sexual molestation coverup). So WHAT??
<Snip>
It's the only idea that makes sense. Everything in the script points
towards Gallifrey, the Time Lords interfering, and the 5th planet being
in their solar system. You'd have to rewrite the laws of English
language comprehension, physics, and mathematics for it to be otherwise.
Consistency please.
Join in anytime SP.
Come on, Solar Penguin. The Asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate >their joy of child sexual molestation coverup) wants/needs your support!!
--
Daniel70
On 20/05/2026 10:08 am, The Doctor wrote:--
In article <MPG.44766ae77c2ba6f8989ed3@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10ui3er$3d68h$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 19/05/2026 17:13, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ui0ao$3c621$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
<Snip>
Except they don't and it doesn't. That's why the Doctor
left. They're all completely insular. They didn't even found
any colonies, so why would something that was not inside
their own solar system influence their own mythology?
Probably because the Fendahl can move across space. If you
don't eat
Why would it know about Gallifrey?
Why would it need to? All that's necessary is that the Gallifreyans
know about it.
Russia 1905?
Close, Asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual >molestation coverup), but no cookie!!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunguska_event
--
Daniel70
On 19/05/2026 10:45 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10uhl8j$38fs3$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 19/05/2026 9:59 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10uhiru$37npd$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
The second star seemed to rise in the East .... and both set in
the South!!
What a wacko orbit Gallifrey must have!!
It didn't orbit the smaller star, so the smaller star didn't have a
straight path across the sky. Makes sense to me.
The two stars would have orbited a common mid-point just as The Moon
doesn't really orbit The Earth, they both orbit a common mid-point,
which I think is just below The Earth's crust but nowhere near the
middle of The Earth.
The stars are orbiting a common barycenter, but what about Gallifrey? It
could be orbiting the pair or directly orbiting the larger one.
To some extent, you could equate it to The Sun, The Earth and The Moon.
The major influence on The Moon's orbit would be The Earth due to The
Earth being much closer to The Moon.
Sure, The Sun would have SOME influence due to its hugemungess size ....
but that is moderated by its much greater distance from The Moon.
----
Daniel70
On 20/05/2026 1:34 am, The Doctor wrote:--
In article <MPG.4476475be19b1427989ece@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10uhrnm$27h4$16@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10uhl8j$38fs3$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The two stars would have orbited a common mid-point just as The Moon >>>>> doesn't really orbit The Earth, they both orbit a common mid-point,
which I think is just below The Earth's crust but nowhere near the
middle of The Earth.
If the barycenter is inside Earth, then as I understand it, the moon
does orbit Earth. It's when the barycenter is outside that we say they
orbit each other. Pluton and Charon are a classic example, with the
barycenter inside neither.
I love how we talk about all kinds of things in this group. I guess
that's one of the great parts about a show like Doctor Who. We can dive
deep into history, astronomy, mythology, and a whole lot of other
things.
What about the 4 PRotoStars in the Solar System?
What about them?
I am referring to Newtonian Physics
WHAT about "Newtonian Physics", Asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate >their joy of child sexual molestation coverup)?? Why are YOU, Asswipe(Word >used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation coverup),
referring to him/it??
and that those protostars can be as powerful as our sun one day.
SORRY!! Did I miss THAT News announcement?? Or is the Asswipe(Word used by >paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation coverup) >referring
to the Four GAS Giants on our Solar System?? No Proto-Stars!!
And, in any case, as the vast VAST majority of the Matter in The Solar >System is already contained with-in the established Bodies, Comets and >Asteroids, I very much doubt there will be any new 'stars' forming in
OUR Stellar System.
--
Daniel70
On 20/05/2026 10:13 am, The Doctor wrote:--
In article <10uisl3$3ka7b$2@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor
<agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 17:07, The Doctor wrote:
In article
<MPG.44765121cbe063f0989ed0@news.eternal-september.org>, The True
Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10uhvte$305m$7@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
I am referring to Newtonian Physics and that those protostars
can be as powerful as our sun one day.
None of them are big enough to ignite. They're often called
"failed stars," though the only failure is not attracting
enough matter.
Of course that could change.
No it couldn't. They're not anywhere large enough to be protostars
or attain nuclear fusion. They're ordinary gas giants.
Atar do go through a life cycle.
"Atar"?? What The ....?? Maybe The asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to >indicate their joy of child sexual molestation coverup) meant "Atari" .... >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atari
--
Daniel70
On 20/05/2026 11:47 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ukc45$1911$5@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10uk97u$3vc75$4@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor
<agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
[quoted text muted]
Where the hell is that going to come from? All the free hydrogen
in the solar system was cleared by the Sun and the gas giants.
Cleared? The most abundant element in the universe?
That doesn't mean clouds of it are floating around our own system.
Eventually the Great Attractor will pull the Milky Way in and smush
it all together.
But 'WE' will have collided with The Andromeda Galaxy before than!! Only >about 2.5 Billion years?
Quote
The Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies have about a 50% chance of
colliding with each other in the next 10 billion years,[15] merging to >potentially form a giant elliptical galaxy[16] or a large lenticular >galaxy.[17]
End Quote.
Oh! No, We can relax .... 10 Billion years!!
--Perhaps some of the gas giants will be stars for a few millennia atWhat 'Black Hole'?? The one at the middle of our Galaxy?? Not gunna
that time, before joining the black hole.
happen as "We'll" collide with The Andromeda Galaxy first!!
--
Daniel70
On 20/05/2026 10:11 am, The Doctor wrote:--
In article <10uiq5l$3jo4j$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 13:32, Daniel70 wrote:
On 19/05/2026 9:59 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10uhiru$37npd$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
The second star seemed to rise in the East .... and both set in
the South!!
What a wacko orbit Gallifrey must have!!
It didn't orbit the smaller star, so the smaller star didn't have a
straight path across the sky. Makes sense to me.
The two stars would have orbited a common mid-point just as The Moon
doesn't really orbit The Earth, they both orbit a common mid-point,
which I think is just below The Earth's crust but nowhere near the
middle of The Earth.
What? Stop making up bullphysics. Everything orbits the common
centre of gravity which in the case of our solar system is almost smack
bang in the middle of the sun and both the Earth and the Sun and all the >>> other planets orbit around that.
For a binary system with similar sized stars it would be somewhere
between the two stars and this fact would make the climate on any planet >>> orbiting the same centre of mass completely unstable by causing it to go >>> from extreme heat to extreme cold or less extreme heat. Also the orbits >>> of the planets would keep shifting and eventually become unstable if
certain criteria are not met to achieve stability.
Does he know Newton?
Well, I can;t comment for Aggy but I know I've NEVER met Newton, Asswipe(Word >used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation coverup)!!
--
Daniel70
On 19/05/2026 13:06, Daniel70 wrote:
On 19/05/2026 7:43 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:00, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 3:34 am, The True Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sunWhat asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same
system as Gallifry and the Time Lords placed it in a time loop so
even if it formed an asteroid belt 12 million years ago it's isn't
the one in our Solar System which is 4.6 billion years old and it
wouldn't be possible to observe it in Gallyfrey's solar system
A Very minor nit-pick .... We live in THE Solar System because the
Ancient Greeks (or whomever) named Our Star 'Sol'. Gallyfreyian's might >>>
in Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any
sun, ie. a star orbited by planets.
If the Gallifreyans had, at some time, spoked Latin, then, Yes, they
No they spoke Greek. Old High Gallifreyan was written in Greek characters.
might have called their STAR Sol and (but which one ... if they are in
a Binary Star system??), therefore, Gallifrey would be in a Solar
System .... but what would the chances of THAT having occurred be?
Long Odds, I might suggest!!
Gallifrey would be in a solar system no matter what language they spoke. Their sun would have been called the sun in all Gallifreyan languages.
Solar system is a generic scientific term for all bodies orbiting or interacting with a star through gravity.
On 20/05/2026 12:17 am, The Doctor wrote:--
In article <10uhiru$37npd$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
<Snip>
The second star seemed to rise in the East .... and both set in the South!! >>>Vampires were enemies of Gallifrey.
What a wacko orbit Gallifrey must have!!
And Vampires!! When have we ever heard of Vampires on Gallifrey?? Is
THAT what makes The Time Lords so different to the ordinary Gallifreyans?? >>
TIme Lords can regenerate. Ordinary people cannot regenate!
And do get me started about the Chibnal perversino
of regenerating cyberGallifreyans.
Oh!! O.K. Asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child >sexual molestation coverup), I will get you 'started about the Chibnal >perversino
(whatever 'perversino' is??) of regenerating cyberGallifreyans.'
Tell us more, Asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy
of child sexual molestation coverup)!!
--
Daniel70
On 20/05/2026 2:59 am, The True Doctor wrote:--
On 19/05/2026 15:05, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.447607682a6deef7989ec5@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10ugvhr$32813$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 18/05/2026 22:51, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol
means sun in Latin. Therefore solar system means sun
system and applies to any sun, ie. a star orbited by
planets.
Many use Sol for our star's name, Terra for our planet's
name, and Luna for our moon's name.
You would if you're Italian. In other languages they have
different names.
Haven't you seen SF writers refer to Sol and Terra and Luna while
writing in English? I have, and it's pretty common.
It's from Latin, not modern Italian.
Correct! The basis of Scientific Genus.
Genus is from Greek not Latin. Most biological terms are Greek
because biology was invented by Aristotle.
Splitting hairs .... but I don't think the Greeks invented biology ....
the definitions, sure, but not the actual Biology!
(The Asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual >molestation coverup)might have you believe GOD did that!! ;-P )
--
Daniel70
Daniel70 wrote:
On 21/05/2026 5:45 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:"say how hot Lalla Ward is... and give it a 10/10 rating]"??
On 20/05/2026 10:13 am, The Doctor wrote:
Come back to that at the City of Death review.
Sure you will, asswipe.
No, he will... if it's part of the script that's online.
(I've looked into my crystal ball and I can see that Dave
will post a twelve line synopsis of "City of Death" later on
this year, say how hot Lalla Ward is... and give it a 10/10
rating]
You wouldn't be suggesting that the Asswipe is a bit of a
Leech ("One that preys on or clings to another; a parasite.")
would you, Blueshirt??
Well... it wouldn't be unknown for Dave to label a companion as
being "hot"! But fair's fair, Lalla Ward was pretty, and Tom
Baker obviously found her hot. So in this case it would be a
legitimate comment.
I was more a fan of Romana v1.0 myself, but we'll do all that in
a few weeks time
His Minister would be soooooo pleased! .... NOT!!
I could point out who I think his Minister would find "hot"
but it's early in the morning and everyone knows where I'd go
with it. So I will just sup my tea and move on...
Daniel70 wrote:
On 20/05/2026 2:26 am, The Doctor wrote:
I said this Solar System.
Mind You I wonder where SP is hiding?
Why, Asswipe?? Are YOU hoping Solar Penguin might come to
your Rescue, Asswipe?? .... I doubt he will.
He's another one keeping his head down and hoping it all
(whatever 'all' is) blows over...
But Penguin does pop in with his reasoned wisdom from time to
time... however, I don't think I can remember a day when he's
actually agreed with Mr Yadallee on anything. If he has, I must
have been busy that day!
And how come YOU, Asswipe, aren't relying on Aggy's support,
Asswipe?? Or have you now realised that Aggy doesn't always
agree with YOU, Asswipe??
Does anyone? I mean, really? !
AGA used to be Dave's online 'friend' but it seems there's a
limit to how much inane gobbledygook a person can put up with...
Daniel70 wrote:
On 20/05/2026 1:34 am, The Doctor wrote:
I am referring to Newtonian Physics
WHAT about "Newtonian Physics", Asswipe??
Is this a rhetorical question or can we all join in?
Why are YOU, Asswipe, referring to him/it??
Take your pick...
1) They are both of Indian descent
2) Dave gets confused and doesn't know what he means.
3) Dave is cleverer than everyone and we are all imbeciles.
One of the above answers is correct.
Probably.
Daniel70 wrote:
On 20/05/2026 10:11 am, The Doctor wrote:
Does he know Newton?
Well, I can't comment for Aggy but I know I've NEVER
met Newton, Asswipe!!
Don't get Agamemnon started on Isaac Newton!!!
On 21/05/2026 7:38 pm, Blueshirt wrote:--
Daniel70 wrote:
On 20/05/2026 1:34 am, The Doctor wrote:
I am referring to Newtonian Physics
WHAT about "Newtonian Physics", Asswipe??
Is this a rhetorical question or can we all join in?
Oh, please do join in, Blueshirt .... but please don't rush in .... give
The asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual >molestation coverup) a bit of a chance to answer first. ;-P
I'm going for 2) .... with a little of 1).Why are YOU, Asswipe, referring to him/it??
Take your pick...
1) They are both of Indian descent
2) Dave gets confused and doesn't know what he means.
3) Dave is cleverer than everyone and we are all imbeciles.
One of the above answers is correct.
Probably.
--
Daniel70
On 20/05/2026 12:20 am, The Doctor wrote:--
In article <10uhkks$389j1$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 19/05/2026 2:16 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/05/2026 03:45, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor
<agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:00, Daniel70 wrote:
<Snip>
A Very minor nit-pick .... We live in THE Solar System because
the Ancient Greeks (or whomever) named Our Star 'Sol'.
Gallyfreyian's might
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means
sun in Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies
to any sun, ie. a star orbited by planets.
have named they star 'SOL', but I doubt it so they don't live
in a Solar System . Stellar System, sure, but not the Solar
System.
The terms solar system and star system (stellar system) are
interchangeable and hardly anyone uses the term stellar system
anyway.
The Sun is a star.
Oh really? I thought it was a giant torch carried in Helios' chariot
across the sky.
Ah!! But then you would only see the 'giant torch' when you were behind
the chariot .... Or was it on the front of the chariot sort of like a
Headlight??
Helios is Greek for the Latin Sol.
Oh!! Really, Asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy
of child sexual molestation coverup)??
What exactly is the point that you are trying to make Mr. AI chat
bot?
Is he EVER trying to make a point .... or just a post to increase his
All Important Precise Post Count??
Or is AGA that ground that he thinks the 5th Planet is a fifth
planet around the Gallifrey System?
I give up!!--
Daniel70
On 20/05/2026 3:05 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/05/2026 13:21, Daniel70 wrote:
On 19/05/2026 2:16 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/05/2026 03:45, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor
<agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:00, Daniel70 wrote:
<Snip>
A Very minor nit-pick .... We live in THE Solar System because
the Ancient Greeks (or whomever) named Our Star 'Sol'.
Gallyfreyian's might
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means
sun in Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies
to any sun, ie. a star orbited by planets.
have named they star 'SOL', but I doubt it so they don't live
in a Solar System . Stellar System, sure, but not the Solar
System.
The terms solar system and star system (stellar system) are
interchangeable and hardly anyone uses the term stellar system
anyway.
The Sun is a star.
Oh really? I thought it was a giant torch carried in Helios' chariot
across the sky.
Ah!! But then you would only see the 'giant torch' when you were behind
the chariot .... Or was it on the front of the chariot sort of like a
Headlight??
It was held in a cauldron above the top of the chariot so you could see
it from all directions.
Ah!! O.K., that sounds reasonable.
--.... and are 'WE' so impressed?? Not me.What exactly is the point that you are trying to make Mr. AI chat
bot?
Is he EVER trying to make a point .... or just a post to increase his
All Important Precise Post Count??
He wants to impress us with his AI scripting ability from the 1980s. AI
scripting has progressed a lot since his scripts were made. He should
try incorporating Grok in them. I think there's a script to do that on
GitHub.
--
Daniel70
On 20/05/2026 3:11 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/05/2026 13:06, Daniel70 wrote:
On 19/05/2026 7:43 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 18/05/2026 11:00, Daniel70 wrote:
On 18/05/2026 3:34 am, The True Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means sunWhat asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same
system as Gallifry and the Time Lords placed it in a time loop so
even if it formed an asteroid belt 12 million years ago it's isn't >>>>>> the one in our Solar System which is 4.6 billion years old and it
wouldn't be possible to observe it in Gallyfrey's solar system
A Very minor nit-pick .... We live in THE Solar System because the
Ancient Greeks (or whomever) named Our Star 'Sol'. Gallyfreyian's might >>>>
in Latin. Therefore solar system means sun system and applies to any
sun, ie. a star orbited by planets.
If the Gallifreyans had, at some time, spoked Latin, then, Yes, they
No they spoke Greek. Old High Gallifreyan was written in Greek characters. >>> might have called their STAR Sol and (but which one ... if they are in
a Binary Star system??), therefore, Gallifrey would be in a Solar
System .... but what would the chances of THAT having occurred be?
Long Odds, I might suggest!!
Gallifrey would be in a solar system no matter what language they spoke.
Their sun would have been called the sun in all Gallifreyan languages.
Solar system is a generic scientific term for all bodies orbiting or
interacting with a star through gravity.
I may have to pull my head in (a bit) as Wikipedia gives the following ....
Quote
Capitalization of the name varies. When not used as a proper noun and >written without capitalization, "solar system" may refer to either the
Solar System itself or any planetary system reminiscent of the Solar >System.[15] The International Astronomical Union, the authoritative body >regarding astronomical nomenclature, specifies capitalizing the names of
all individual astronomical objects but uses mixed "Solar System" and
"solar system" structures in their naming guidelines document.[20]
End Quote
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_System
If it's good enough for the IAS ....
----
Daniel70
The True Doctor wrote:
On 20/05/2026 23:22, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pq0e1klr2cbt003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Maybe it's just me, but I find a discussion about levels
of education taking place on RADW [of all places] quite
humorous....
So how does Ireland work?
Obviously to higher level than Australia and Canada,
especially Canada.
I'm just amazed that a person can be a CEO of a tech company in
2026 yet they can't read, understand what they read or compose a
sentence properly... I don't mean properly to equate with 'Full
Professor of English' level... but just a basic comprehension
level!
On 20/05/2026 11:47 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ukc45$1911$5@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10uk97u$3vc75$4@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor
<agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
[quoted text muted]
Where the hell is that going to come from? All the free hydrogen
in the solar system was cleared by the Sun and the gas giants.
Cleared? The most abundant element in the universe?
That doesn't mean clouds of it are floating around our own system.
Eventually the Great Attractor will pull the Milky Way in and smush
it all together.
But 'WE' will have collided with The Andromeda Galaxy before than!! Only about 2.5 Billion years?
Quote
The Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies have about a 50% chance of
colliding with each other in the next 10 billion years,[15] merging to potentially form a giant elliptical galaxy[16] or a large lenticular galaxy.[17]
End Quote.
Oh! No, We can relax .... 10 Billion years!!
Perhaps some of the gas giants will be stars for a few millennia at
that time, before joining the black hole.
What 'Black Hole'?? The one at the middle of our Galaxy?? Not gunna
happen as "We'll" collide with The Andromeda Galaxy first!!
On 20/05/2026 12:20 am, The Doctor wrote:
[quoted text muted]
Ah!! But then you would only see the 'giant torch' when you were behind
the chariot .... Or was it on the front of the chariot sort of like a
Headlight??
Helios is Greek for the Latin Sol.
Oh!! Really, Asswipe??
Daniel70 wrote:
On 20/05/2026 10:11 am, The Doctor wrote:
Does he know Newton?
Well, I can't comment for Aggy but I know I've NEVER
met Newton, Asswipe!!
Don't get Agamemnon started on Isaac Newton!!!
On 21/05/2026 7:40 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Don't get Agamemnon started on Isaac Newton!!!
Aggy's got to get over it .... eventually!!
Verily, in article <10umr11$mu3m$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 21/05/2026 7:40 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Aggy's got to get over it .... eventually!!
Don't get Agamemnon started on Isaac Newton!!!
If we all got over the things that annoy us, what would we talk about
here?
Verily, in article <10umcrl$j06a$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 >@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 20/05/2026 11:47 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ukc45$1911$5@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10uk97u$3vc75$4@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor
<agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
[quoted text muted]
Where the hell is that going to come from? All the free hydrogen
in the solar system was cleared by the Sun and the gas giants.
Cleared? The most abundant element in the universe?
That doesn't mean clouds of it are floating around our own system.
Eventually the Great Attractor will pull the Milky Way in and smush
it all together.
But 'WE' will have collided with The Andromeda Galaxy before than!! Only
about 2.5 Billion years?
Quote
The Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies have about a 50% chance of
colliding with each other in the next 10 billion years,[15] merging to
potentially form a giant elliptical galaxy[16] or a large lenticular
galaxy.[17]
End Quote.
Oh! No, We can relax .... 10 Billion years!!
Of course, that also means there's a 50% chance we *won't* merge with >Andromeda.
Perhaps some of the gas giants will be stars for a few millennia atWhat 'Black Hole'?? The one at the middle of our Galaxy?? Not gunna
that time, before joining the black hole.
happen as "We'll" collide with The Andromeda Galaxy first!!
Oh, all this stuff is gradually piling together. Earth ends up in a
black hole one way or another.
Stellar motions are complex. Everything's shooting apart, but being
pulled together into clumps as it goes, and eventually it'll all clump
up again. That's current thinking, anyway.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
Verily, in article <10umn76$lsh4$2@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 >@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 20/05/2026 12:20 am, The Doctor wrote:
[quoted text muted]
Ah!! But then you would only see the 'giant torch' when you were behind >> >> the chariot .... Or was it on the front of the chariot sort of like a
Headlight??
Helios is Greek for the Latin Sol.
Oh!! Really, Asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy
of child sexual molestation coverup)??
I mean... yes? Helios is Greek. He was once the creator of the entire >universe, got demoted to being just a sun god, and eventually ended up
as nothing but Apollo's charioteer. It was a downward trajectory for
Helios, as with most tribes' early gods when the tribes formed >civilizations.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
On 21/05/2026 7:40 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:Aggy's got to get over it .... eventually!!
On 20/05/2026 10:11 am, The Doctor wrote:
Does he know Newton?
Well, I can't comment for Aggy but I know I've NEVER
met Newton, Asswipe!!
Don't get Agamemnon started on Isaac Newton!!!
----
Daniel70
Verily, in article <10umr11$mu3m$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 >@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 21/05/2026 7:40 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Aggy's got to get over it .... eventually!!
Don't get Agamemnon started on Isaac Newton!!!
If we all got over the things that annoy us, what would we talk about
here?
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
On 21/05/2026 9:51 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10umr11$mu3m$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47The upcoming ChristmasWho, maybe!! ;-P
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 21/05/2026 7:40 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Aggy's got to get over it .... eventually!!
Don't get Agamemnon started on Isaac Newton!!!
If we all got over the things that annoy us, what would we talk about
here?
----
Daniel70
In article <MPG.4478b772e68d531d989edc@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10umcrl$j06a$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 >@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 20/05/2026 11:47 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ukc45$1911$5@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10uk97u$3vc75$4@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor
<agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
[quoted text muted]
Where the hell is that going to come from? All the free hydrogen
in the solar system was cleared by the Sun and the gas giants.
Cleared? The most abundant element in the universe?
That doesn't mean clouds of it are floating around our own system.
Eventually the Great Attractor will pull the Milky Way in and smush
it all together.
But 'WE' will have collided with The Andromeda Galaxy before than!! Only >> about 2.5 Billion years?
Quote
The Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies have about a 50% chance of
colliding with each other in the next 10 billion years,[15] merging to
potentially form a giant elliptical galaxy[16] or a large lenticular
galaxy.[17]
End Quote.
Oh! No, We can relax .... 10 Billion years!!
Of course, that also means there's a 50% chance we *won't* merge with >Andromeda.
Perhaps some of the gas giants will be stars for a few millennia atWhat 'Black Hole'?? The one at the middle of our Galaxy?? Not gunna
that time, before joining the black hole.
happen as "We'll" collide with The Andromeda Galaxy first!!
Oh, all this stuff is gradually piling together. Earth ends up in a
black hole one way or another.
Stellar motions are complex. Everything's shooting apart, but being
pulled together into clumps as it goes, and eventually it'll all clump
up again. That's current thinking, anyway.
Now where is the centre of the Universe?
Verily, in article <10umn76$lsh4$2@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 20/05/2026 12:20 am, The Doctor wrote:
[quoted text muted]
Ah!! But then you would only see the 'giant torch' when you were behind >>>> the chariot .... Or was it on the front of the chariot sort of like a
Headlight??
Helios is Greek for the Latin Sol.
Oh!! Really, Asswipe??
I mean... yes? Helios is Greek. He was once the creator of the entire universe, got demoted to being just a sun god, and eventually ended up
as nothing but Apollo's charioteer. It was a downward trajectory for
Helios, as with most tribes' early gods when the tribes formed
civilizations.
Verily, in article <10umcrl$j06a$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 20/05/2026 11:47 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ukc45$1911$5@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10uk97u$3vc75$4@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor
<agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
[quoted text muted]
Where the hell is that going to come from? All the free hydrogen
in the solar system was cleared by the Sun and the gas giants.
Cleared? The most abundant element in the universe?
That doesn't mean clouds of it are floating around our own system.
Eventually the Great Attractor will pull the Milky Way in and smush
it all together.
But 'WE' will have collided with The Andromeda Galaxy before than!! Only
about 2.5 Billion years?
Quote
The Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies have about a 50% chance of
colliding with each other in the next 10 billion years,[15] merging to
potentially form a giant elliptical galaxy[16] or a large lenticular
galaxy.[17]
End Quote.
Oh! No, We can relax .... 10 Billion years!!
Of course, that also means there's a 50% chance we *won't* merge with Andromeda.
Perhaps some of the gas giants will be stars for a few millennia atWhat 'Black Hole'?? The one at the middle of our Galaxy?? Not gunna
that time, before joining the black hole.
happen as "We'll" collide with The Andromeda Galaxy first!!
Oh, all this stuff is gradually piling together. Earth ends up in a
black hole one way or another.
Stellar motions are complex. Everything's shooting apart, but being
pulled together into clumps as it goes, and eventually it'll all clump
up again. That's current thinking, anyway.
On 21/05/2026 7:38 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 20/05/2026 1:34 am, The Doctor wrote:
I am referring to Newtonian Physics
WHAT about "Newtonian Physics", Asswipe??
Is this a rhetorical question or can we all join in?
Oh, please do join in, Blueshirt .... but please don't
rush in... give The asswipe a bit of a chance to answer
first.
Why are YOU, Asswipe, referring to him/it??
Take your pick...
1) They are both of Indian descent
2) Dave gets confused and doesn't know what he means.
3) Dave is cleverer than everyone and we are all imbeciles.
One of the above answers is correct.
Probably.
I'm going for 2) .... with a little of 1).
On 21/05/2026 9:51 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10umr11$mu3m$1@dont-email.me>, did
daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 21/05/2026 7:40 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Don't get Agamemnon started on Isaac Newton!!!
Aggy's got to get over it .... eventually!!
If we all got over the things that annoy us, what would
we talk about here?
The upcoming ChristmasWho, maybe!!
Verily, in article <10umsu2$cg7$3@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Now where is the centre of the Universe?
The cool part is that there is none. There's no center that
everything's moving away from. Everything's moving away from
everything else, while also being pulled toward everything
else by gravity.
This is what leads to the Big Bang Theory, which says that the
Big Bang didn't just shoot out matter but actually created
space-time.
In article <xn0pq1cf0bhw9b8004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
And how come YOU, Asswipe, aren't relying on Aggy's support,
Asswipe?? Or have you now realised that Aggy doesn't always
agree with YOU, Asswipe??
Does anyone? I mean, really? !
AGA used to be Dave's online 'friend' but it seems there's a
limit to how much inane gobbledygook a person can put up with...
Still is.
Verily, in article <10umcrl$j06a$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 20/05/2026 11:47 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Perhaps some of the gas giants will be stars for a few millennia atWhat 'Black Hole'?? The one at the middle of our Galaxy?? Not gunna
that time, before joining the black hole.
happen as "We'll" collide with The Andromeda Galaxy first!!
Oh, all this stuff is gradually piling together. Earth ends up in a
black hole one way or another.
Stellar motions are complex. Everything's shooting apart, but being
pulled together into clumps as it goes, and eventually it'll all clump
up again. That's current thinking, anyway.
On 21/05/2026 8:55 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pq1cf0bhw9b8004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
AGA used to be Dave's online 'friend' but it seems
there's a limit to how much inane gobbledygook a
person can put up with...
Still is.
Yes, Asswipe, "there's a limit to how much inane gobbledygook
a person can put up with...", even Aggy!!
Verily, in article <10umr11$mu3m$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 21/05/2026 7:40 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Aggy's got to get over it .... eventually!!
Don't get Agamemnon started on Isaac Newton!!!
If we all got over the things that annoy us, what would we talk about
here?
In article <10umsel$ndkk$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 21/05/2026 9:51 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10umr11$mu3m$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47The upcoming ChristmasWho, maybe!! ;-P
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 21/05/2026 7:40 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Aggy's got to get over it .... eventually!!
Don't get Agamemnon started on Isaac Newton!!!
If we all got over the things that annoy us, what would we talk
about here?
That might be a no go!
On 21/05/2026 9:32 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Stellar motions are complex. Everything's shooting apart, but being
pulled together into clumps as it goes, and eventually it'll all clump
up again. That's current thinking, anyway.
... leading to a Second Big Bang!! Or has it already happened before??
... and Before?? .... and Before!!
On 21/05/2026 10:15 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10umsel$ndkk$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The upcoming ChristmasWho, maybe!! ;-P
That might be a no go!
Yea, right, who'd ever discuss 'Doctor Who' in a newsgroup about 'Doctor Who'??
On 20/05/2026 2:59 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/05/2026 15:05, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.447607682a6deef7989ec5@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10ugvhr$32813$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 18/05/2026 22:51, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means >>>>>>> sun in Latin. Therefore solar system means sun
system and applies to any sun, ie. a star orbited by
planets.
Many use Sol for our star's name, Terra for our planet's name, and >>>>>> Luna for our moon's name.
You would if you're Italian. In other languages they have different >>>>> names.
Haven't you seen SF writers refer to Sol and Terra and Luna while
writing in English? I have, and it's pretty common.
It's from Latin, not modern Italian.
Correct! The basis of Scientific Genus.
Genus is from Greek not Latin. Most biological terms are Greek because
biology was invented by Aristotle.
Splitting hairs .... but I don't think the Greeks invented biology ....
the definitions, sure, but not the actual Biology!
(The Asswipe might have you believe GOD did that!! ;-P )
Verily, in article <10un0ms$omrb$4@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 21/05/2026 10:15 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10umsel$ndkk$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The upcoming ChristmasWho, maybe!! ;-P
That might be a no go!
Yea, right, who'd ever discuss 'Doctor Who' in a
newsgroup about 'Doctor Who'??
It may not even get made.
It's not looking good for the show's future.
Recent seasons also weren't looking good for the show'sfuture,
so I'm not even sure how to hope.
On 21/05/2026 9:37 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10umn76$lsh4$2@dont-email.me>, did daniel47
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 20/05/2026 12:20 am, The Doctor wrote:
[quoted text muted]
Ah!! But then you would only see the 'giant torch' when you were
behind
the chariot .... Or was it on the front of the chariot sort of like a >>>>> Headlight??
Helios is Greek for the Latin Sol.
Oh!! Really, Asswipe??
I mean... yes? Helios is Greek. He was once the creator of the entire
universe, got demoted to being just a sun god, and eventually ended up
as nothing but Apollo's charioteer. It was a downward trajectory forYeah, they do get demoted, don't they.
Helios, as with most tribes' early gods when the tribes formed
civilizations.
I'm no expert ... but I thought Zeus was the Boss of Boss' .... until I
saw a Greek Gods film last week where, because 'we' humans were losing
faith in the Greek Gods, Zeus had to Hide from the Bigger Boss.
You live, you learn .... but I don't think the Film mentioned the name
of the Bigger Boss. Aggy!!
On 21/05/2026 9:51 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10umr11$mu3m$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47The upcoming ChristmasWho, maybe!! ;-P
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 21/05/2026 7:40 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Aggy's got to get over it .... eventually!!
Don't get Agamemnon started on Isaac Newton!!!
If we all got over the things that annoy us, what would we talk about
here?
Verily, in article <10un0ms$omrb$4@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 21/05/2026 10:15 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10umsel$ndkk$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The upcoming ChristmasWho, maybe!! ;-P
That might be a no go!
Yea, right, who'd ever discuss 'Doctor Who' in a newsgroup about 'Doctor
Who'??
It may not even get made. It's not looking good for the show's future.
Recent seasons also weren't looking good for the show's future, so I'm
not even sure how to hope.
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10un0ms$omrb$4@dont-email.me>, did daniel47
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 21/05/2026 10:15 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10umsel$ndkk$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The upcoming ChristmasWho, maybe!! ;-P
That might be a no go!
Yea, right, who'd ever discuss 'Doctor Who' in a
newsgroup about 'Doctor Who'??
It may not even get made.
It'll get made alright, they say the money is there and the
script is done... it's whether there will be any new "Doctor
Who" episodes after that.
It's not looking good for the show's future.
I'm not expecting anything in 2027 anyway... after that, who
knows?
Recent seasons also weren't looking good for the show'sfuture,
"Doctor Who" will always live on even if it's not on the TV...
the EU was thriving during the wilderness years, and Big Finish
are not going away anytime soon.
so I'm not even sure how to hope.
RADW is your beacon of hope!
Verily, in article <10umsu2$cg7$3@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did >doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <MPG.4478b772e68d531d989edc@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10umcrl$j06a$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 20/05/2026 11:47 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ukc45$1911$5@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10uk97u$3vc75$4@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor
<agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
[quoted text muted]
Where the hell is that going to come from? All the free hydrogen
in the solar system was cleared by the Sun and the gas giants.
Cleared? The most abundant element in the universe?
That doesn't mean clouds of it are floating around our own system.
Eventually the Great Attractor will pull the Milky Way in and smush
it all together.
But 'WE' will have collided with The Andromeda Galaxy before than!! Only >> >> about 2.5 Billion years?
Quote
The Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies have about a 50% chance of
colliding with each other in the next 10 billion years,[15] merging to >> >> potentially form a giant elliptical galaxy[16] or a large lenticular
galaxy.[17]
End Quote.
Oh! No, We can relax .... 10 Billion years!!
Of course, that also means there's a 50% chance we *won't* merge with
Andromeda.
Perhaps some of the gas giants will be stars for a few millennia atWhat 'Black Hole'?? The one at the middle of our Galaxy?? Not gunna
that time, before joining the black hole.
happen as "We'll" collide with The Andromeda Galaxy first!!
Oh, all this stuff is gradually piling together. Earth ends up in a
black hole one way or another.
Stellar motions are complex. Everything's shooting apart, but being
pulled together into clumps as it goes, and eventually it'll all clump
up again. That's current thinking, anyway.
Now where is the centre of the Universe?
The cool part is that there is none. There's no center that everything's >moving away from. Everything's moving away from everything else, while
also being pulled toward everything else by gravity.
This is what leads to the Big Bang Theory, which says that the Big Bang >didn't just shoot out matter but actually created space-time.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
On 21/05/2026 9:37 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10umn76$lsh4$2@dont-email.me>, did daniel47Yeah, they do get demoted, don't they.
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 20/05/2026 12:20 am, The Doctor wrote:
[quoted text muted]
Ah!! But then you would only see the 'giant torch' when you were behind >>>>> the chariot .... Or was it on the front of the chariot sort of like a >>>>> Headlight??
Helios is Greek for the Latin Sol.
Oh!! Really, Asswipe??
I mean... yes? Helios is Greek. He was once the creator of the entire
universe, got demoted to being just a sun god, and eventually ended up
as nothing but Apollo's charioteer. It was a downward trajectory for
Helios, as with most tribes' early gods when the tribes formed
civilizations.
I'm no expert ... but I thought Zeus was the Boss of Boss' .... until I
saw a Greek Gods film last week where, because 'we' humans were losing
faith in the Greek Gods, Zeus had to Hide from the Bigger Boss.
You live, you learn .... but I don't think the Film mentioned the name
of the Bigger Boss. Aggy!!
----
Daniel70
On 21/05/2026 9:32 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10umcrl$j06a$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 20/05/2026 11:47 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ukc45$1911$5@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10uk97u$3vc75$4@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor
<agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
[quoted text muted]
Where the hell is that going to come from? All the free hydrogen
in the solar system was cleared by the Sun and the gas giants.
Cleared? The most abundant element in the universe?
That doesn't mean clouds of it are floating around our own system.
Eventually the Great Attractor will pull the Milky Way in and smush
it all together.
But 'WE' will have collided with The Andromeda Galaxy before than!! Only >>> about 2.5 Billion years?
Quote
The Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies have about a 50% chance of
colliding with each other in the next 10 billion years,[15] merging to
potentially form a giant elliptical galaxy[16] or a large lenticular
galaxy.[17]
End Quote.
Oh! No, We can relax .... 10 Billion years!!
Of course, that also means there's a 50% chance we *won't* merge with
Andromeda.
Hmm!! Now that you point that out, Melissa ...... I thought the
'collusion' of the two Galaxy's was 100% .... but the chances of
anything with-in either Galaxy hitting something from the other Galaxy
was sooooo slim as there is just sooooo much empty space out there.
----Perhaps some of the gas giants will be stars for a few millennia atWhat 'Black Hole'?? The one at the middle of our Galaxy?? Not gunna
that time, before joining the black hole.
happen as "We'll" collide with The Andromeda Galaxy first!!
Oh, all this stuff is gradually piling together. Earth ends up in a
black hole one way or another.
Stellar motions are complex. Everything's shooting apart, but being
pulled together into clumps as it goes, and eventually it'll all clump
up again. That's current thinking, anyway.
Daniel70
Daniel70 wrote:
On 21/05/2026 9:51 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10umr11$mu3m$1@dont-email.me>, didThe upcoming ChristmasWho, maybe!!
daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 21/05/2026 7:40 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Aggy's got to get over it .... eventually!!
Don't get Agamemnon started on Isaac Newton!!!
If we all got over the things that annoy us, what would
we talk about here?
Featuring a cameo by Rajesh Newton... from the parallel
universe.
Some mavity for the Nativity!
:)
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10umsu2$cg7$3@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Now where is the centre of the Universe?
The cool part is that there is none. There's no center that
everything's moving away from. Everything's moving away from
everything else, while also being pulled toward everything
else by gravity.
This is what leads to the Big Bang Theory, which says that the
Big Bang didn't just shoot out matter but actually created
space-time.
Now you've gone and done it! Dave ain't gonna be having any of
that "Big Bang" nonsense. That's blasphemy!
On 21/05/2026 8:55 pm, The Doctor wrote:--
In article <xn0pq1cf0bhw9b8004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
<Snip>
Yes, Asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual >molestation coverup), "there's a limit to how much inane gobbledygook a personAnd how come YOU, Asswipe, aren't relying on Aggy's support,
Asswipe?? Or have you now realised that Aggy doesn't always
agree with YOU, Asswipe??
Does anyone? I mean, really? !
AGA used to be Dave's online 'friend' but it seems there's a
limit to how much inane gobbledygook a person can put up with...
Still is.
can put up with...", even Aggy!!
--
Daniel70
On 21/05/2026 9:32 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10umcrl$j06a$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 20/05/2026 11:47 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
<Snip>
... leading to a Second Big Bang!! Or has it already happened before??Perhaps some of the gas giants will be stars for a few millennia atWhat 'Black Hole'?? The one at the middle of our Galaxy?? Not gunna
that time, before joining the black hole.
happen as "We'll" collide with The Andromeda Galaxy first!!
Oh, all this stuff is gradually piling together. Earth ends up in a
black hole one way or another.
Stellar motions are complex. Everything's shooting apart, but being
pulled together into clumps as it goes, and eventually it'll all clump
up again. That's current thinking, anyway.
... and Before?? .... and Before!!
----
Daniel70
Daniel70 wrote:
On 21/05/2026 8:55 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pq1cf0bhw9b8004@post.eweka.nl>,Yes, Asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
AGA used to be Dave's online 'friend' but it seems
there's a limit to how much inane gobbledygook a
person can put up with...
Still is.
sexual molestation, "there's a limit to how much inane gobbledygook
a person can put up with...", even Aggy!!
Dave is so dense he probably doesn't even realise that Agamemnon
has been taking him to task and mocking his literacy 'skills'...
it goes over his head and he just carries on.
On 21/05/2026 9:51 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10umr11$mu3m$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47Hmm! Good point!! ;-)
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 21/05/2026 7:40 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Aggy's got to get over it .... eventually!!
Don't get Agamemnon started on Isaac Newton!!!
If we all got over the things that annoy us, what would we talk about
here?
----
Daniel70
On 21/05/2026 10:15 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10umsel$ndkk$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 21/05/2026 9:51 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10umr11$mu3m$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47The upcoming ChristmasWho, maybe!! ;-P
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 21/05/2026 7:40 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Aggy's got to get over it .... eventually!!
Don't get Agamemnon started on Isaac Newton!!!
If we all got over the things that annoy us, what would we talk
about here?
That might be a no go!
Yea, right, who'd ever discuss 'Doctor Who' in a newsgroup about 'Doctor >Who'??
----
Daniel70
Verily, in article <10un0cm$omrb$2@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 >@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 21/05/2026 9:32 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
... leading to a Second Big Bang!! Or has it already happened before??
Stellar motions are complex. Everything's shooting apart, but being
pulled together into clumps as it goes, and eventually it'll all clump
up again. That's current thinking, anyway.
... and Before?? .... and Before!!
There are those who say the Big Bang and Big Crunch are an endless
cycle. There are others who say otherwise. :-)
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
Verily, in article <10un0ms$omrb$4@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 >@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 21/05/2026 10:15 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10umsel$ndkk$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The upcoming ChristmasWho, maybe!! ;-P
That might be a no go!
Yea, right, who'd ever discuss 'Doctor Who' in a newsgroup about 'Doctor
Who'??
It may not even get made. It's not looking good for the show's future. >Recent seasons also weren't looking good for the show's future, so I'm
not even sure how to hope.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
On 21/05/2026 09:15, Daniel70 wrote:
On 20/05/2026 2:59 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/05/2026 15:05, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.447607682a6deef7989ec5@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10ugvhr$32813$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 18/05/2026 22:51, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means >>>>>>>> sun in Latin. Therefore solar system means sun
system and applies to any sun, ie. a star orbited by
planets.
Many use Sol for our star's name, Terra for our planet's name, and >>>>>>> Luna for our moon's name.
You would if you're Italian. In other languages they have different >>>>>> names.
Haven't you seen SF writers refer to Sol and Terra and Luna while
writing in English? I have, and it's pretty common.
It's from Latin, not modern Italian.
Correct! The basis of Scientific Genus.
Genus is from Greek not Latin. Most biological terms are Greek because
biology was invented by Aristotle.
Splitting hairs .... but I don't think the Greeks invented biology ....
the definitions, sure, but not the actual Biology!
(The Asswipe might have you believe GOD did that!! ;-P )
"AI Overview Aristotle (384–322 BCE) is considered the >founder of biology, establishing a systematic, empirical study of life
based on observation, dissection, and classification. His zoological
works, constituting roughly 25% of his surviving writings, focused on
animal anatomy, reproduction, and function, driven by a teleological
view that living structures serve specific purposes."
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-biology/
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10un0ms$omrb$4@dont-email.me>, did daniel47
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 21/05/2026 10:15 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10umsel$ndkk$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The upcoming ChristmasWho, maybe!! ;-P
That might be a no go!
Yea, right, who'd ever discuss 'Doctor Who' in a
newsgroup about 'Doctor Who'??
It may not even get made.
It'll get made alright, they say the money is there and the
script is done... it's whether there will be any new "Doctor
Who" episodes after that.
It's not looking good for the show's future.
I'm not expecting anything in 2027 anyway... after that, who
knows?
Recent seasons also weren't looking good for the show'sfuture,
"Doctor Who" will always live on even if it's not on the TV...
the EU was thriving during the wilderness years, and Big Finish
are not going away anytime soon.
so I'm not even sure how to hope.
RADW is your beacon of hope!
On 21/05/2026 13:38, Daniel70 wrote:
On 21/05/2026 9:37 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10umn76$lsh4$2@dont-email.me>, did daniel47
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 20/05/2026 12:20 am, The Doctor wrote:
[quoted text muted]
Ah!! But then you would only see the 'giant torch' when you were
behind
the chariot .... Or was it on the front of the chariot sort of like a >>>>>> Headlight??
Helios is Greek for the Latin Sol.
Oh!! Really, Asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate
their joy of child sexual molestation??
I mean... yes? Helios is Greek. He was once the creator of the entire
universe, got demoted to being just a sun god, and eventually ended up
And before Helios his father Hyperion was the sun god.
as nothing but Apollo's charioteer. It was a downward trajectory forYeah, they do get demoted, don't they.
Helios, as with most tribes' early gods when the tribes formed
civilizations.
I'm no expert ... but I thought Zeus was the Boss of Boss' .... until I
saw a Greek Gods film last week where, because 'we' humans were losing
faith in the Greek Gods, Zeus had to Hide from the Bigger Boss.
You live, you learn .... but I don't think the Film mentioned the name
of the Bigger Boss. Aggy!!
What film was that? Thor: Love and Thunder? Arnold Schwarzenegger’s >Hercules in New York?
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 21/05/2026 13:05, Daniel70 wrote:
On 21/05/2026 9:51 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10umr11$mu3m$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47The upcoming ChristmasWho, maybe!! ;-P
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 21/05/2026 7:40 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Aggy's got to get over it .... eventually!!
Don't get Agamemnon started on Isaac Newton!!!
If we all got over the things that annoy us, what would we talk about
here?
There's no upcoming Christmas Doctor Who. Doctor Who ended in 2017.
RTD's degenerate fan fiction does not count.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 21/05/2026 14:29, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10un0ms$omrb$4@dont-email.me>, did daniel47
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 21/05/2026 10:15 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10umsel$ndkk$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The upcoming ChristmasWho, maybe!! ;-P
That might be a no go!
Yea, right, who'd ever discuss 'Doctor Who' in a newsgroup about 'Doctor >>> Who'??
It may not even get made. It's not looking good for the show's future.
Let's hope this piece of fan fiction does not.
Recent seasons also weren't looking good for the show's future, so I'm
not even sure how to hope.
Nothing was looking good for the show's future from the moment they
turned the Master into a woman and the ratings collapsed in half as a
direct consequence.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 21/05/2026 17:50, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10un0ms$omrb$4@dont-email.me>, did daniel47
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 21/05/2026 10:15 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10umsel$ndkk$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The upcoming ChristmasWho, maybe!! ;-P
That might be a no go!
Yea, right, who'd ever discuss 'Doctor Who' in a
newsgroup about 'Doctor Who'??
It may not even get made.
It'll get made alright, they say the money is there and the
script is done... it's whether there will be any new "Doctor
Who" episodes after that.
Who's going to be playing the Doctor? Why would anyone agree to playing
the role when there's no money for a new series and even if there was no
one would watch it after the franchise was totally demolished by turning
the Doctor into a homosexual and making the entire show about this
sexuality and effeminacy.
It's not looking good for the show's future.
I'm not expecting anything in 2027 anyway... after that, who
knows?
The franchise is dead. It will stay completely dead until the BBC
recognise that turning the Doctor into a homosexual and a mass murdering >genocidal monster from another dimension and insulting every fan and
viewer who called it out was a big mistake and apologise. The only way
back passes through Dallas when someone wakes up from this hideous >nightmare.
Recent seasons also weren't looking good for the show'sfuture,
"Doctor Who" will always live on even if it's not on the TV...
the EU was thriving during the wilderness years, and Big Finish
are not going away anytime soon.
so I'm not even sure how to hope.
RADW is your beacon of hope!
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Daniel70 wrote:
On 21/05/2026 7:38 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 20/05/2026 1:34 am, The Doctor wrote:
I am referring to Newtonian Physics
WHAT about "Newtonian Physics", Asswipe(Word used by paedophiles
to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation coverup)??
Is this a rhetorical question or can we all join in?
Oh, please do join in, Blueshirt .... but please don't
rush in... give The asswipe a bit of a chance to answer
first.
I won't be able to see his answer anyway.
Well, unless somebody replies to it.
I'm going for 2) .... with a little of 1).Why are YOU, Asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate
their joy of child sexual molestation coverup), referring to him/it??
Take your pick...
1) They are both of Indian descent
2) Dave gets confused and doesn't know what he means.
3) Dave is cleverer than everyone and we are all imbeciles.
One of the above answers is correct.
Probably.
I think 2) would be the sensible choice.
A centre must exist to disperse from.
Verily, in article <10uo1n7$2t5e$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did >doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
A centre must exist to disperse from.
Nope. All bodies are moving away from all bodies. Gravity is another
force which can override that in some cases.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
Verily, in article <10un0cm$omrb$2@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 21/05/2026 9:32 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
... leading to a Second Big Bang!! Or has it already happened before??
Stellar motions are complex. Everything's shooting apart, but being
pulled together into clumps as it goes, and eventually it'll all clump
up again. That's current thinking, anyway.
... and Before?? .... and Before!!
There are those who say the Big Bang and Big Crunch are an endless
cycle. There are others who say otherwise. :-)
On 21/05/2026 09:15, Daniel70 wrote:
On 20/05/2026 2:59 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/05/2026 15:05, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.447607682a6deef7989ec5@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10ugvhr$32813$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 18/05/2026 22:51, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means >>>>>>>> sun in Latin. Therefore solar system means sun
system and applies to any sun, ie. a star orbited by
planets.
Many use Sol for our star's name, Terra for our planet's name,
and Luna for our moon's name.
You would if you're Italian. In other languages they have
different names.
Haven't you seen SF writers refer to Sol and Terra and Luna while
writing in English? I have, and it's pretty common.
It's from Latin, not modern Italian.
Correct! The basis of Scientific Genus.
Genus is from Greek not Latin. Most biological terms are Greek
because biology was invented by Aristotle.
Splitting hairs .... but I don't think the Greeks invented biology ....
the definitions, sure, but not the actual Biology!
(The Asswipe might have you believe GOD did that!! ;-P )
"AI Overview Aristotle (384–322 BCE) is considered the
founder of biology, establishing a systematic, empirical study of life
based on observation, dissection, and classification. His zoological
works, constituting roughly 25% of his surviving writings, focused on
animal anatomy, reproduction, and function, driven by a teleological
view that living structures serve specific purposes."
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-biology/
On 21/05/2026 11:26 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10un0cm$omrb$2@dont-email.me>, did daniel47Yes, that's the other big theory .... who's name I can't re .... hang
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 21/05/2026 9:32 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
... leading to a Second Big Bang!! Or has it already happened before??
Stellar motions are complex. Everything's shooting apart, but being
pulled together into clumps as it goes, and eventually it'll all clump >>>> up again. That's current thinking, anyway.
... and Before?? .... and Before!!
There are those who say the Big Bang and Big Crunch are an endless
cycle. There are others who say otherwise. :-)
on, .... is that "The Steady State" Theorem??
----
Daniel70
On 22/05/2026 1:29 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/05/2026 09:15, Daniel70 wrote:YES, Aggy, SURE, Aggy, Aristotle might have FORMALISED THE STUDY OF
On 20/05/2026 2:59 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/05/2026 15:05, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.447607682a6deef7989ec5@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10ugvhr$32813$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 18/05/2026 22:51, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means >>>>>>>>> sun in Latin. Therefore solar system means sun
system and applies to any sun, ie. a star orbited by
planets.
Many use Sol for our star's name, Terra for our planet's name, >>>>>>>> and Luna for our moon's name.
You would if you're Italian. In other languages they have
different names.
Haven't you seen SF writers refer to Sol and Terra and Luna while
writing in English? I have, and it's pretty common.
It's from Latin, not modern Italian.
Correct! The basis of Scientific Genus.
Genus is from Greek not Latin. Most biological terms are Greek
because biology was invented by Aristotle.
Splitting hairs .... but I don't think the Greeks invented biology ....
the definitions, sure, but not the actual Biology!
(The Asswipe might have you believe GOD did that!! ;-P )
"AI Overview Aristotle (384–322 BCE) is >considered the
founder of biology, establishing a systematic, empirical study of life
based on observation, dissection, and classification. His zoological
works, constituting roughly 25% of his surviving writings, focused on
animal anatomy, reproduction, and function, driven by a teleological
view that living structures serve specific purposes."
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-biology/
Biology .... but he DIDN'T INVENT IT!!
Who'd ever Believe AI??
----
Daniel70
On 21/05/2026 13:38, Daniel70 wrote:
On 21/05/2026 9:37 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10umn76$lsh4$2@dont-email.me>, did daniel47
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 20/05/2026 12:20 am, The Doctor wrote:
[quoted text muted]
Ah!! But then you would only see the 'giant torch' when you were
behind
the chariot .... Or was it on the front of the chariot sort of like a >>>>>> Headlight??
Helios is Greek for the Latin Sol.
Oh!! Really, Asswipe??
I mean... yes? Helios is Greek. He was once the creator of the entire
universe, got demoted to being just a sun god, and eventually ended up
And before Helios his father Hyperion was the sun god.
as nothing but Apollo's charioteer. It was a downward trajectory forYeah, they do get demoted, don't they.
Helios, as with most tribes' early gods when the tribes formed
civilizations.
I'm no expert ... but I thought Zeus was the Boss of Boss' .... until
I saw a Greek Gods film last week where, because 'we' humans were
losing faith in the Greek Gods, Zeus had to Hide from the Bigger Boss.
You live, you learn .... but I don't think the Film mentioned the name
of the Bigger Boss. Aggy!!
What film was that? Thor: Love and Thunder? Arnold Schwarzenegger’s Hercules in New York?
On 21/05/2026 13:38, Daniel70 wrote:
On 21/05/2026 9:37 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10umn76$lsh4$2@dont-email.me>, did daniel47
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 20/05/2026 12:20 am, The Doctor wrote:
[quoted text muted]
Ah!! But then you would only see the 'giant torch' when you were
behind
the chariot .... Or was it on the front of the chariot sort of like a >>>>>> Headlight??
Helios is Greek for the Latin Sol.
Oh!! Really, Asswipe??
I mean... yes? Helios is Greek. He was once the creator of the entire
universe, got demoted to being just a sun god, and eventually ended up
And before Helios his father Hyperion was the sun god.
as nothing but Apollo's charioteer. It was a downward trajectory forYeah, they do get demoted, don't they.
Helios, as with most tribes' early gods when the tribes formed
civilizations.
I'm no expert ... but I thought Zeus was the Boss of Boss' .... until
I saw a Greek Gods film last week where, because 'we' humans were
losing faith in the Greek Gods, Zeus had to Hide from the Bigger Boss.
You live, you learn .... but I don't think the Film mentioned the name
of the Bigger Boss. Aggy!!
What film was that? Thor: Love and Thunder? Arnold Schwarzenegger’s Hercules in New York?
In article <10upaqr$1dkhf$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 22/05/2026 1:29 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/05/2026 09:15, Daniel70 wrote:
considered theSplitting hairs .... but I don't think the Greeks invented biology .... >>>> the definitions, sure, but not the actual Biology!
(The Asswipe might have you believe GOD did that!! ;-P )
"AI Overview              Aristotle (384–322 BCE) is
founder of biology, establishing a systematic, empirical study of lifeYES, Aggy, SURE, Aggy, Aristotle might have FORMALISED THE STUDY OF
based on observation, dissection, and classification. His zoological
works, constituting roughly 25% of his surviving writings, focused on
animal anatomy, reproduction, and function, driven by a teleological
view that living structures serve specific purposes."
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-biology/
Biology .... but he DIDN'T INVENT IT!!
Who'd ever Believe AI??
And you wonder why many mock it.
On 22/05/2026 5:38 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/05/2026 13:38, Daniel70 wrote:No, it was about 'Perseus', the guy that rode 'Pegasus', the winged
On 21/05/2026 9:37 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10umn76$lsh4$2@dont-email.me>, did daniel47
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 20/05/2026 12:20 am, The Doctor wrote:
[quoted text muted]
Ah!! But then you would only see the 'giant torch' when you were >>>>>>> behind
the chariot .... Or was it on the front of the chariot sort of like a >>>>>>> Headlight??
Helios is Greek for the Latin Sol.
Oh!! Really, Asswipe??
I mean... yes? Helios is Greek. He was once the creator of the entire
universe, got demoted to being just a sun god, and eventually ended up
And before Helios his father Hyperion was the sun god.
as nothing but Apollo's charioteer. It was a downward trajectory forYeah, they do get demoted, don't they.
Helios, as with most tribes' early gods when the tribes formed
civilizations.
I'm no expert ... but I thought Zeus was the Boss of Boss' .... until
I saw a Greek Gods film last week where, because 'we' humans were
losing faith in the Greek Gods, Zeus had to Hide from the Bigger Boss.
You live, you learn .... but I don't think the Film mentioned the name
of the Bigger Boss. Aggy!!
What film was that? Thor: Love and Thunder? Arnold Schwarzenegger’s
Hercules in New York?
horse, and then 'Perseus' went and beheaded 'Medusa' and used her head
to defeat a Sea Monster that was going to wipe out his city.
Can't recognise it amongst the films offered by imdb.com when I entered >"Perseus" in the filter field .... but imdb.com DID offer the
possibility of the film being called "Godzilla v Kong" .... which I
think was the film I watched AFTER the Perseus film.
----
Daniel70
On 22/05/2026 8:41 pm, Daniel70 wrote:
Sorry about the double post ... my internet connection has been playing
up tonight.
--
Daniel70
On 22/05/2026 8:49 pm, The Doctor wrote:--
In article <10upaqr$1dkhf$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 22/05/2026 1:29 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/05/2026 09:15, Daniel70 wrote:
<Snip>
considered theSplitting hairs .... but I don't think the Greeks invented biology .... >>>>> the definitions, sure, but not the actual Biology!
(The Asswipe might have you believe GOD did that!! ;-P )
"AI Overview              >Aristotle (384–322 BCE) is
founder of biology, establishing a systematic, empirical study of life >>>> based on observation, dissection, and classification. His zoologicalYES, Aggy, SURE, Aggy, Aristotle might have FORMALISED THE STUDY OF
works, constituting roughly 25% of his surviving writings, focused on
animal anatomy, reproduction, and function, driven by a teleological
view that living structures serve specific purposes."
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-biology/
Biology .... but he DIDN'T INVENT IT!!
Who'd ever Believe AI??
And you wonder why many mock it.
No, Asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
sexual molestation coverup), I DON'T wonder.
--
Daniel70
On 21/05/2026 14:29, The True Melissa wrote:
[Doctor Who Christmas Special]
It may not even get made. It's not looking good for
the show's future.
Let's hope this piece of fan fiction does not.
On 21/05/2026 13:05, Daniel70 wrote:
The upcoming ChristmasWho, maybe!! ;-P
There's no upcoming Christmas Doctor Who.
Doctor Who ended in 2017.
RTD's degenerate fan fiction does not count.
On 21/05/2026 17:50, Blueshirt wrote:
It'll get made alright, they say the money is there
and the script is done... it's whether there will be
any new "Doctor Who" episodes after that.
Who's going to be playing the Doctor?
Why would anyone agree to playing the role when there's no
money for a new series
and even if there was no one would watch it after the franchise
was totally demolished by turning the Doctor into a homosexual
and making the entire show about this sexuality and effeminacy.
You've read the same rumours as me... David Tennant.
Or maybe it really will be Billie Piper?!
Why would anyone agree to playing the role when there's no
money for a new series
This delusional YouTube fan theory that nobody would want to
play The Doctor is bonkers!
Verily, in article <xn0pq2wu91kygfx002@post.eweka.nl>, did blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
You've read the same rumours as me... David Tennant.
Or maybe it really will be Billie Piper?!
Yeah, probably Tennant. They're not going to go for
someone new or for Piper. They'll bring back Tennant and
hope nostalgia brings in viewers.
Why would anyone agree to playing the role when there's no
money for a new series
This delusional YouTube fan theory that nobody would want to
play The Doctor is bonkers!
Yeah, plenty of people would take that role. It's not the
hottest role on TV any more, but it's not cursed.
Has anyone seen the Twenty Twenty Six show David Tennant's
currently narrating? It has only six stars out of ten, so I
gather it's not great.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/05/2026 14:29, The True Melissa wrote:
[Doctor Who Christmas Special]
It may not even get made. It's not looking good for
the show's future.
Let's hope this piece of fan fiction does not.
I would rather we had poor Doctor Who on the TV than no
Doctor Who on the TV... if Doctor Who becomes a show that
I dislike, I can choose not to watch it. I have plenty of
alternative ways to pass my time.
Wishing to see planned episodes of Doctor Who cancelled
because it doesn't suit our personal tastes is selfish
entitlement. Why deprive others that might like it? We are
not TV gods that decide who can watch/like stuff on the
TV, and what they can't watch/like - just because we don't
like it!
Don't like something - don't watch it!
On 21/05/2026 11:26 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10un0cm$omrb$2@dont-email.me>, did daniel47Yes, that's the other big theory .... who's name I can't re .... hang
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 21/05/2026 9:32 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
... leading to a Second Big Bang!! Or has it already happened before??
Stellar motions are complex. Everything's shooting apart, but being
pulled together into clumps as it goes, and eventually it'll all clump >>>> up again. That's current thinking, anyway.
... and Before?? .... and Before!!
There are those who say the Big Bang and Big Crunch are an endless
cycle. There are others who say otherwise. :-)
on, .... is that "The Steady State" Theorem??
The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/05/2026 13:05, Daniel70 wrote:
The upcoming ChristmasWho, maybe!! ;-P
There's no upcoming Christmas Doctor Who.
Doctor Who ended in 2017.
I thought we were going back to the moon-egg thing?
Or was it the TV Movie?
RTD's degenerate fan fiction does not count.
It might not count to you, or maybe even me (depending on
what I think of it at the time) but you will still watch
it and review it here ... so we've that to look forward to
at Christmas.
In article <10upaqr$1dkhf$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 22/05/2026 1:29 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/05/2026 09:15, Daniel70 wrote:considered the
On 20/05/2026 2:59 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/05/2026 15:05, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.447607682a6deef7989ec5@news.eternal-september.org>, >>>>>> The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10ugvhr$32813$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 18/05/2026 22:51, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means >>>>>>>>>> sun in Latin. Therefore solar system means sun
system and applies to any sun, ie. a star orbited by
planets.
Many use Sol for our star's name, Terra for our planet's name, >>>>>>>>> and Luna for our moon's name.
You would if you're Italian. In other languages they have
different names.
Haven't you seen SF writers refer to Sol and Terra and Luna while >>>>>>> writing in English? I have, and it's pretty common.
It's from Latin, not modern Italian.
Correct! The basis of Scientific Genus.
Genus is from Greek not Latin. Most biological terms are Greek
because biology was invented by Aristotle.
Splitting hairs .... but I don't think the Greeks invented biology .... >>>> the definitions, sure, but not the actual Biology!
(The Asswipe might have you believe GOD did that!! ;-P )
"AI Overview Aristotle (384–322 BCE) is
founder of biology, establishing a systematic, empirical study of lifeYES, Aggy, SURE, Aggy, Aristotle might have FORMALISED THE STUDY OF
based on observation, dissection, and classification. His zoological
works, constituting roughly 25% of his surviving writings, focused on
animal anatomy, reproduction, and function, driven by a teleological
view that living structures serve specific purposes."
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-biology/
Biology .... but he DIDN'T INVENT IT!!
Who'd ever Believe AI??
And you wonder why many mock it.
On 22/05/2026 1:29 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/05/2026 09:15, Daniel70 wrote:YES, Aggy, SURE, Aggy, Aristotle might have FORMALISED THE STUDY OF
On 20/05/2026 2:59 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/05/2026 15:05, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.447607682a6deef7989ec5@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10ugvhr$32813$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 18/05/2026 22:51, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means >>>>>>>>> sun in Latin. Therefore solar system means sun
system and applies to any sun, ie. a star orbited by
planets.
Many use Sol for our star's name, Terra for our planet's name, >>>>>>>> and Luna for our moon's name.
You would if you're Italian. In other languages they have
different names.
Haven't you seen SF writers refer to Sol and Terra and Luna while
writing in English? I have, and it's pretty common.
It's from Latin, not modern Italian.
Correct! The basis of Scientific Genus.
Genus is from Greek not Latin. Most biological terms are Greek
because biology was invented by Aristotle.
Splitting hairs .... but I don't think the Greeks invented biology ....
the definitions, sure, but not the actual Biology!
(The Asswipe might have you believe GOD did that!! ;-P )
"AI Overview Aristotle (384–322 BCE) is considered the
founder of biology, establishing a systematic, empirical study of life
based on observation, dissection, and classification. His zoological
works, constituting roughly 25% of his surviving writings, focused on
animal anatomy, reproduction, and function, driven by a teleological
view that living structures serve specific purposes."
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-biology/
Biology .... but he DIDN'T INVENT IT!!
Who'd ever Believe AI??
On 22/05/2026 5:38 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/05/2026 13:38, Daniel70 wrote:No, it was about 'Perseus', the guy that rode 'Pegasus', the winged
On 21/05/2026 9:37 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10umn76$lsh4$2@dont-email.me>, did daniel47
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 20/05/2026 12:20 am, The Doctor wrote:
[quoted text muted]
Ah!! But then you would only see the 'giant torch' when you were >>>>>>> behind
the chariot .... Or was it on the front of the chariot sort of
like a
Headlight??
Helios is Greek for the Latin Sol.
Oh!! Really, Asswipe??
I mean... yes? Helios is Greek. He was once the creator of the entire
universe, got demoted to being just a sun god, and eventually ended up
And before Helios his father Hyperion was the sun god.
as nothing but Apollo's charioteer. It was a downward trajectory forYeah, they do get demoted, don't they.
Helios, as with most tribes' early gods when the tribes formed
civilizations.
I'm no expert ... but I thought Zeus was the Boss of Boss' .... until
I saw a Greek Gods film last week where, because 'we' humans were
losing faith in the Greek Gods, Zeus had to Hide from the Bigger Boss.
You live, you learn .... but I don't think the Film mentioned the
name of the Bigger Boss. Aggy!!
What film was that? Thor: Love and Thunder? Arnold Schwarzenegger’s
Hercules in New York?
horse, and then 'Perseus' went and beheaded 'Medusa' and used her head
to defeat a Sea Monster that was going to wipe out his city.
Can't recognise it amongst the films offered by imdb.com when I entered "Perseus" in the filter field .... but imdb.com DID offer the
possibility of the film being called "Godzilla v Kong" .... which I
think was the film I watched AFTER the Perseus film.
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
RTD's degenerate fan fiction does not count.
It might not count to you, or maybe even me (depending on
what I think of it at the time) but you will still watch
it and review it here ... so we've that to look forward to
at Christmas.
I will be watching this degeneracy just like I watched Davies'
and McTighe's bestiality series The War Between the Land and
the Sea so that others don't have to.
Note that I have not watched the totally degenerate Star Fleet
Academy. Star Trek ended in 2005.
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
I would rather we had poor Doctor Who on the TV than no
Doctor Who on the TV... if Doctor Who becomes a show that
I dislike, I can choose not to watch it. I have plenty of
alternative ways to pass my time.
There's been no Doctor Who on TV since 2017.
Wishing to see planned episodes of Doctor Who cancelled
because it doesn't suit our personal tastes is selfish
entitlement. Why deprive others that might like it? We are
Fucking up the entire franchise with your disgusting and
degenerate fan fiction aimed at attacking and insulting the
audience is selfish entitlement.
not TV gods that decide who can watch/like stuff on the
TV, and what they can't watch/like - just because we don't
like it!
Tell that to the perverts Chris Chibnall and Russell T Davies.
Don't like something - don't watch it!
They're not. The ratings for the degeneracy that replaced
Doctor Who have fallen through the floor to under 1.5 million.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/05/2026 14:29, The True Melissa wrote:
[Doctor Who Christmas Special]
It may not even get made. It's not looking good for
the show's future.
Let's hope this piece of fan fiction does not.
I would rather we had poor Doctor Who on the TV than no
Doctor Who on the TV... if Doctor Who becomes a show that
I dislike, I can choose not to watch it. I have plenty of
alternative ways to pass my time.
Wishing to see planned episodes of Doctor Who cancelled
because it doesn't suit our personal tastes is selfish
entitlement. Why deprive others that might like it? We are
not TV gods that decide who can watch/like stuff on the
TV, and what they can't watch/like - just because we don't
like it!
Don't like something - don't watch it!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/05/2026 13:05, Daniel70 wrote:
The upcoming ChristmasWho, maybe!! ;-P
There's no upcoming Christmas Doctor Who.
Doctor Who ended in 2017.
I thought we were going back to the moon-egg thing?
Or was it the TV Movie?
RTD's degenerate fan fiction does not count.
It might not count to you, or maybe even me (depending on
what I think of it at the time) but you will still watch
it and review it here ... so we've that to look forward to
at Christmas.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/05/2026 17:50, Blueshirt wrote:
It'll get made alright, they say the money is there
and the script is done... it's whether there will be
any new "Doctor Who" episodes after that.
Who's going to be playing the Doctor?
You've read the same rumours as me... David Tennant.
Or maybe it really will be Billie Piper?!
Why would anyone agree to playing the role when there's no
money for a new series
This delusional YouTube fan theory that nobody would want to
play The Doctor is bonkers! It's a big role and I doubt there's
many actors that would turn the job down if offered it.
and even if there was no one would watch it after the franchise
was totally demolished by turning the Doctor into a homosexual
and making the entire show about this sexuality and effeminacy.
There will be plenty of trendy actors who wouldn't be thinking
like you about those sort of things. It's 2026 not 1956, nobody
is in the closet anymore. Anything goes. You might have
issues/hangs ups over that sort of thing, but have you seen
modern TV drama? Finding an actor/actress to play The Doctor
will not be as hard as you seem to think it is.
Having the money and international distribution deal for an
ongoing series will be more of a factor than the actual casting.
That's why what happens after the Christmas special is the
bigger question.
Verily, in article <xn0pq2wu91kygfx002@post.eweka.nl>, did >blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
You've read the same rumours as me... David Tennant.
Or maybe it really will be Billie Piper?!
Yeah, probably Tennant. They're not going to go for someone new or for >Piper. They'll bring back Tennant and hope nostalgia brings in viewers.
Why would anyone agree to playing the role when there's no
money for a new series
This delusional YouTube fan theory that nobody would want to
play The Doctor is bonkers!
Yeah, plenty of people would take that role. It's not the hottest role
on TV any more, but it's not cursed.
Has anyone seen the Twenty Twenty Six show David Tennant's currently >narrating? It has only six stars out of ten, so I gather it's not great.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0pq2wu91kygfx002@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
You've read the same rumours as me... David Tennant.
Or maybe it really will be Billie Piper?!
Yeah, probably Tennant. They're not going to go for
someone new or for Piper. They'll bring back Tennant and
hope nostalgia brings in viewers.
If there is going to be a 'new' Doctor cast then I think it
will be at the end of the Christmas special. I would bet money
the main focus of the Christmas episode will be the
Tennant/Piper combination... RTD returning to his Greatest Hits
once again.
Why would anyone agree to playing the role when there's no
money for a new series
This delusional YouTube fan theory that nobody would want to
play The Doctor is bonkers!
Yeah, plenty of people would take that role. It's not the
hottest role on TV any more, but it's not cursed.
There's plenty of actors who would see it as an opportunity.
Has anyone seen the Twenty Twenty Six show David Tennant's
currently narrating? It has only six stars out of ten, so I
gather it's not great.
Nah, haven't seen it. I might check it out before the World Cup.
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/05/2026 14:29, The True Melissa wrote:
[Doctor Who Christmas Special]
It may not even get made. It's not looking good for
the show's future.
Let's hope this piece of fan fiction does not.
I would rather we had poor Doctor Who on the TV than no
Doctor Who on the TV... if Doctor Who becomes a show that
I dislike, I can choose not to watch it. I have plenty of
alternative ways to pass my time.
There's been no Doctor Who on TV since 2017.
Wishing to see planned episodes of Doctor Who cancelled
because it doesn't suit our personal tastes is selfish
entitlement. Why deprive others that might like it? We are
F*king up the entire franchise with your disgusting and degenerate fan >fiction aimed at attacking and insulting the audience is selfish >entitlement.
not TV gods that decide who can watch/like stuff on the
TV, and what they can't watch/like - just because we don't
like it!
Tell that to the perverts Chris Chibnall and Russell T Davies.
Don't like something - don't watch it!
They're not. The ratings for the degeneracy that replaced Doctor Who
have fallen through the floor to under 1.5 million.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 22/05/2026 11:12, Daniel70 wrote:
On 21/05/2026 11:26 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10un0cm$omrb$2@dont-email.me>, did daniel47Yes, that's the other big theory .... who's name I can't re .... hang
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 21/05/2026 9:32 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
... leading to a Second Big Bang!! Or has it already happened before?? >>>> ... and Before?? .... and Before!!
Stellar motions are complex. Everything's shooting apart, but being
pulled together into clumps as it goes, and eventually it'll all clump >>>>> up again. That's current thinking, anyway.
There are those who say the Big Bang and Big Crunch are an endless
cycle. There are others who say otherwise. :-)
on, .... is that "The Steady State" Theorem??
Hawking trashed that one when he was an undergrad.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/05/2026 13:05, Daniel70 wrote:
The upcoming ChristmasWho, maybe!! ;-P
There's no upcoming Christmas Doctor Who.
Doctor Who ended in 2017.
I thought we were going back to the moon-egg thing?
Or was it the TV Movie?
RTD's degenerate fan fiction does not count.
It might not count to you, or maybe even me (depending on
what I think of it at the time) but you will still watch
it and review it here ... so we've that to look forward to
at Christmas.
I will be watching this degeneracy just like I watched Davies' and
McTighe's bestiality series The War Between the Land and the Sea so that >others don't have to. Note that I have not watched the totally
degenerate Star Fleet Academy. Star Trek ended in 2005.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 22/05/2026 11:49, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10upaqr$1dkhf$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 22/05/2026 1:29 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/05/2026 09:15, Daniel70 wrote:considered the
On 20/05/2026 2:59 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/05/2026 15:05, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.447607682a6deef7989ec5@news.eternal-september.org>, >>>>>>> The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10ugvhr$32813$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 18/05/2026 22:51, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means >>>>>>>>>>> sun in Latin. Therefore solar system means sun
system and applies to any sun, ie. a star orbited by
planets.
Many use Sol for our star's name, Terra for our planet's name, >>>>>>>>>> and Luna for our moon's name.
You would if you're Italian. In other languages they have
different names.
Haven't you seen SF writers refer to Sol and Terra and Luna while >>>>>>>> writing in English? I have, and it's pretty common.
It's from Latin, not modern Italian.
Correct! The basis of Scientific Genus.
Genus is from Greek not Latin. Most biological terms are Greek
because biology was invented by Aristotle.
Splitting hairs .... but I don't think the Greeks invented biology .... >>>>> the definitions, sure, but not the actual Biology!
(The Asswipe might have you believe GOD did that!! ;-P )
"AI Overview Aristotle (384–322 BCE) is
founder of biology, establishing a systematic, empirical study of life >>>> based on observation, dissection, and classification. His zoologicalYES, Aggy, SURE, Aggy, Aristotle might have FORMALISED THE STUDY OF
works, constituting roughly 25% of his surviving writings, focused on
animal anatomy, reproduction, and function, driven by a teleological
view that living structures serve specific purposes."
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-biology/
Biology .... but he DIDN'T INVENT IT!!
Who'd ever Believe AI??
And you wonder why many mock it.
You are an AI chatbot. Why are you mocking yourself?
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 22/05/2026 11:23, Daniel70 wrote:
On 22/05/2026 1:29 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/05/2026 09:15, Daniel70 wrote:YES, Aggy, SURE, Aggy, Aristotle might have FORMALISED THE STUDY OF
On 20/05/2026 2:59 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/05/2026 15:05, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.447607682a6deef7989ec5@news.eternal-september.org>, >>>>>> The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10ugvhr$32813$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 18/05/2026 22:51, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10ug16p$2qnpl$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No they didn't. The Romans called the sun Sol because sol means >>>>>>>>>> sun in Latin. Therefore solar system means sun
system and applies to any sun, ie. a star orbited by
planets.
Many use Sol for our star's name, Terra for our planet's name, >>>>>>>>> and Luna for our moon's name.
You would if you're Italian. In other languages they have
different names.
Haven't you seen SF writers refer to Sol and Terra and Luna while >>>>>>> writing in English? I have, and it's pretty common.
It's from Latin, not modern Italian.
Correct! The basis of Scientific Genus.
Genus is from Greek not Latin. Most biological terms are Greek
because biology was invented by Aristotle.
Splitting hairs .... but I don't think the Greeks invented biology .... >>>> the definitions, sure, but not the actual Biology!
(The Asswipe might have you believe GOD did that!! ;-P )
"AI Overview Aristotle (384–322 BCE) is >considered the
founder of biology, establishing a systematic, empirical study of life
based on observation, dissection, and classification. His zoological
works, constituting roughly 25% of his surviving writings, focused on
animal anatomy, reproduction, and function, driven by a teleological
view that living structures serve specific purposes."
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-biology/
Biology .... but he DIDN'T INVENT IT!!
Stanford says he did.
Who'd ever Believe AI??
Who'd ever believe Stanford university.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 22/05/2026 11:41, Daniel70 wrote:
On 22/05/2026 5:38 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/05/2026 13:38, Daniel70 wrote:No, it was about 'Perseus', the guy that rode 'Pegasus', the winged
On 21/05/2026 9:37 pm, The True Melissa wrote:And before Helios his father Hyperion was the sun god.
Verily, in article <10umn76$lsh4$2@dont-email.me>, did daniel47
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 20/05/2026 12:20 am, The Doctor wrote:
[quoted text muted]
Ah!! But then you would only see the 'giant torch' when you were >>>>>>>> behind
the chariot .... Or was it on the front of the chariot sort of >>>>>>>> like a
Headlight??
Helios is Greek for the Latin Sol.
Oh!! Really, Asswipe??
I mean... yes? Helios is Greek. He was once the creator of the entire >>>>> universe, got demoted to being just a sun god, and eventually ended up >>>
as nothing but Apollo's charioteer. It was a downward trajectory for >>>>> Helios, as with most tribes' early gods when the tribes formedYeah, they do get demoted, don't they.
civilizations.
I'm no expert ... but I thought Zeus was the Boss of Boss' .... until >>>> I saw a Greek Gods film last week where, because 'we' humans were
losing faith in the Greek Gods, Zeus had to Hide from the Bigger Boss. >>>>
You live, you learn .... but I don't think the Film mentioned the
name of the Bigger Boss. Aggy!!
What film was that? Thor: Love and Thunder? Arnold Schwarzenegger’s
Hercules in New York?
horse, and then 'Perseus' went and beheaded 'Medusa' and used her head
to defeat a Sea Monster that was going to wipe out his city.
Where in the story of Perseus is Zeus deposed from his position as head
of the gods by some bigger boss?
Can't recognise it amongst the films offered by imdb.com when I entered
"Perseus" in the filter field .... but imdb.com DID offer the
possibility of the film being called "Godzilla v Kong" .... which I
think was the film I watched AFTER the Perseus film.
You've gone and mixed up your movies like you did before.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
RTD's degenerate fan fiction does not count.
It might not count to you, or maybe even me (depending on
what I think of it at the time) but you will still watch
it and review it here ... so we've that to look forward to
at Christmas.
I will be watching this degeneracy just like I watched Davies'
and McTighe's bestiality series The War Between the Land and
the Sea so that others don't have to.
I'm glad you will watch and review the Doctor Who Christmas
special... in your own indomitable style of course.
There's only about five normal people bothering their arse
to contribute here on a regular basis, so we need all the
entertaining reading that we can get to overcome the noise.
Note that I have not watched the totally degenerate Star Fleet
Academy. Star Trek ended in 2005.
Why don't you watch "Star Trek: Starfleet Academy" so that
others don't have to?
The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
There's been no Doctor Who on TV since 2017.
I would rather we had poor Doctor Who on the TV than no
Doctor Who on the TV... if Doctor Who becomes a show that
I dislike, I can choose not to watch it. I have plenty of
alternative ways to pass my time.
Stay tuned... Christmas is coming.
Wishing to see planned episodes of Doctor Who cancelled
because it doesn't suit our personal tastes is selfish
entitlement. Why deprive others that might like it? We are
Fucking up the entire franchise with your disgusting and
degenerate fan fiction aimed at attacking and insulting the
audience is selfish entitlement.
I'd like to think that the next Doctor Who showrunner will get
the show back to basics and concentrate on telling good stories.
not TV gods that decide who can watch/like stuff on the
TV, and what they can't watch/like - just because we don't
like it!
Tell that to the perverts Chris Chibnall and Russell T Davies.
Not perverts, more like, rich middle class old men that think
they are being trendy, right-on, and hip with the youngsters by
ticking the correct left-wing inclusivity/diversity boxes.
But the younger generation just laugh at those pathetic old men
and go and watch something else instead... which is why the
Doctor Who ratings have plummeted since 2017. There's plenty of
better quality TV shows to watch on the various channels and
streaming services.
Don't like something - don't watch it!
They're not. The ratings for the degeneracy that replaced
Doctor Who have fallen through the floor to under 1.5 million.
More people need to watch it so that others don't have to then.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
RTD's degenerate fan fiction does not count.
It might not count to you, or maybe even me (depending on
what I think of it at the time) but you will still watch
it and review it here ... so we've that to look forward to
at Christmas.
I will be watching this degeneracy just like I watched Davies'
and McTighe's bestiality series The War Between the Land and
the Sea so that others don't have to.
I'm glad you will watch and review the Doctor Who Christmas
special... in your own indomitable style of course.
There's only about five normal people bothering their arse
to contribute here on a regular basis, so we need all the
entertaining reading that we can get to overcome the noise.
Note that I have not watched the totally degenerate Star Fleet
Academy. Star Trek ended in 2005.
Why don't you watch "Star Trek: Starfleet Academy" so that
others don't have to?
On 22/05/2026 20:03, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
RTD's degenerate fan fiction does not count.
It might not count to you, or maybe even me (depending on
what I think of it at the time) but you will still watch
it and review it here ... so we've that to look forward to
at Christmas.
I will be watching this degeneracy just like I watched Davies'
and McTighe's bestiality series The War Between the Land and
the Sea so that others don't have to.
I'm glad you will watch and review the Doctor Who Christmas
special... in your own indomitable style of course.
There is no Doctor Who Christmas special. Doctor Who ended in 2017.
There's only about five normal people bothering their arse
to contribute here on a regular basis, so we need all the
entertaining reading that we can get to overcome the noise.
5 normal people and an AI chatbot.
Maybe we should ask it some maths questions to answer and if it doesn't
show any working out then it doesn't get any marks?
We'll start of easy and then they will get more difficult.
What are the solutions to x^2 + 8x + 15 = 0 ?
If i is the square root of -1, what is 1/i ?
Write 30 as a product of its primes ?
No working out no marks remember. No one is allowed to offer it any
help, at least not at the moment.
Note that I have not watched the totally degenerate Star Fleet
Academy. Star Trek ended in 2005.
Why don't you watch "Star Trek: Starfleet Academy" so that
others don't have to?
It's total degenerate garbage. I am not going to damage my health
watching it. Star Trek ended in 2005.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
In article <10ur2k8$1uhrr$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 22/05/2026 20:03, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
RTD's degenerate fan fiction does not count.
It might not count to you, or maybe even me (depending on
what I think of it at the time) but you will still watch
it and review it here ... so we've that to look forward to
at Christmas.
I will be watching this degeneracy just like I watched Davies'
and McTighe's bestiality series The War Between the Land and
the Sea so that others don't have to.
I'm glad you will watch and review the Doctor Who Christmas
special... in your own indomitable style of course.
There is no Doctor Who Christmas special. Doctor Who ended in 2017.
There's only about five normal people bothering their arse
to contribute here on a regular basis, so we need all the
entertaining reading that we can get to overcome the noise.
5 normal people and an AI chatbot.
Maybe we should ask it some maths questions to answer and if it doesn't
show any working out then it doesn't get any marks?
We'll start of easy and then they will get more difficult.
What are the solutions to x^2 + 8x + 15 = 0 ?
(X+3)(X+5)=0
That X can be -3 or -5
If i is the square root of -1, what is 1/i ?
I/(i^2) which is -i
Write 30 as a product of its primes ?
2 * 3 * 5
No working out no marks remember. No one is allowed to offer it any
help, at least not at the moment.
Note that I have not watched the totally degenerate Star Fleet
Academy. Star Trek ended in 2005.
Why don't you watch "Star Trek: Starfleet Academy" so that
others don't have to?
It's total degenerate garbage. I am not going to damage my health
watching it. Star Trek ended in 2005.
Jar Jar Abrams and Co.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/05/2026 17:50, Blueshirt wrote:
It'll get made alright, they say the money is there
and the script is done... it's whether there will be
any new "Doctor Who" episodes after that.
Who's going to be playing the Doctor?
You've read the same rumours as me... David Tennant.
Or maybe it really will be Billie Piper?!
Why would anyone agree to playing the role when there's no
money for a new series
This delusional YouTube fan theory that nobody would want to
play The Doctor is bonkers! It's a big role and I doubt there's
many actors that would turn the job down if offered it.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
Don't like something - don't watch it!
They're not. The ratings for the degeneracy that replaced
Doctor Who have fallen through the floor to under 1.5 million.
More people need to watch it so that others don't have to then.
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/05/2026 13:05, Daniel70 wrote:
The upcoming ChristmasWho, maybe!! ;-P
There's no upcoming Christmas Doctor Who. Doctor Who ended in
2017.
I thought we were going back to the moon-egg thing?
Or was it the TV Movie?
RTD's degenerate fan fiction does not count.
It might not count to you, or maybe even me (depending on what I
think of it at the time) but you will still watch it and review it
here ... so we've that to look forward to at Christmas.
I will be watching this degeneracy just like I watched Davies' and
McTighe's bestiality series The War Between the Land and the Sea so
that others don't have to.
Note that I have not watched the totally degenerate Star Fleet
Academy. Star Trek ended in 2005.
On 22/05/2026 20:03, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
RTD's degenerate fan fiction does not count.
It might not count to you, or maybe even me (depending on
what I think of it at the time) but you will still watch
it and review it here ... so we've that to look forward to
at Christmas.
I will be watching this degeneracy just like I watched Davies'
and McTighe's bestiality series The War Between the Land and
the Sea so that others don't have to.
I'm glad you will watch and review the Doctor Who Christmas
special... in your own indomitable style of course.
There is no Doctor Who Christmas special. Doctor Who ended in 2017.
In article <10upt4j$1jcui$3@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 22/05/2026 11:49, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10upaqr$1dkhf$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Who'd ever Believe AI??
And you wonder why many mock it.
You are an AI chatbot. Why are you mocking yourself?
I will let you guess.
BTW , post your reviews in the FB groups.
On 22/05/2026 11:41, Daniel70 wrote:
On 22/05/2026 5:38 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/05/2026 13:38, Daniel70 wrote:No, it was about 'Perseus', the guy that rode 'Pegasus', the winged
On 21/05/2026 9:37 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10umn76$lsh4$2@dont-email.me>, did
daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 20/05/2026 12:20 am, The Doctor wrote:
[quoted text muted]
Ah!! But then you would only see the 'giant torch' when
you were behind the chariot .... Or was it on the front
of the chariot sort of like a Headlight??
Helios is Greek for the Latin Sol.
Oh!! Really, Asswipe??
I mean... yes? Helios is Greek. He was once the creator of
the entire universe, got demoted to being just a sun god, and
eventually ended up
And before Helios his father Hyperion was the sun god.
as nothing but Apollo's charioteer. It was a downwardYeah, they do get demoted, don't they.
trajectory for Helios, as with most tribes' early gods when
the tribes formed civilizations.
I'm no expert ... but I thought Zeus was the Boss of Boss' ....
until I saw a Greek Gods film last week where, because 'we'
humans were losing faith in the Greek Gods, Zeus had to Hide
from the Bigger Boss.
You live, you learn .... but I don't think the Film mentioned
the name of the Bigger Boss. Aggy!!
What film was that? Thor: Love and Thunder? Arnold
Schwarzenegger’s Hercules in New York?
horse, and then 'Perseus' went and beheaded 'Medusa' and used her
head to defeat a Sea Monster that was going to wipe out his city.
Where in the story of Perseus is Zeus deposed from his position as
head of the gods by some bigger boss?
On 23/05/2026 5:04 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Don't like something - don't watch it!
They're not. The ratings for the degeneracy that replaced
Doctor Who have fallen through the floor to under 1.5
million.
More people need to watch it so that others don't have to
then.
So DON'T put it on any Streaming Service and lock out those
who don't/will not pay for such services.
Daniel70 wrote:
On 23/05/2026 5:04 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
So DON'T put it on any Streaming Service and lock out thoseDon't like something - don't watch it!
They're not. The ratings for the degeneracy that replaced
Doctor Who have fallen through the floor to under 1.5
million.
More people need to watch it so that others don't have to
then.
who don't/will not pay for such services.
Stop free-loading and pay for it then...
But if you don't, Agamemnon will watch it so you don't have to!
On 23/05/2026 1:42 am, The True Doctor wrote:
[quoted text muted]
horse, and then 'Perseus' went and beheaded 'Medusa' and used her
head to defeat a Sea Monster that was going to wipe out his city.
Where in the story of Perseus is Zeus deposed from his position as
head of the gods by some bigger boss?
The Film I'm referring to is "Wrath of the Titans" ....
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1646987/?ref_=nm_flmg_job_1_accord_2_cdt_t_89
O.K., so it might have been Zeus' other son, Ares, who was trying to
take over .... but I'm sure they mentioned an Over-Boss
On 23/05/2026 05:55, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ur2k8$1uhrr$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 22/05/2026 20:03, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
RTD's degenerate fan fiction does not count.
It might not count to you, or maybe even me (depending on
what I think of it at the time) but you will still watch
it and review it here ... so we've that to look forward to
at Christmas.
I will be watching this degeneracy just like I watched Davies'
and McTighe's bestiality series The War Between the Land and
the Sea so that others don't have to.
I'm glad you will watch and review the Doctor Who Christmas
special... in your own indomitable style of course.
There is no Doctor Who Christmas special. Doctor Who ended in 2017.
There's only about five normal people bothering their arse
to contribute here on a regular basis, so we need all the
entertaining reading that we can get to overcome the noise.
5 normal people and an AI chatbot.
Maybe we should ask it some maths questions to answer and if it doesn't
show any working out then it doesn't get any marks?
We'll start of easy and then they will get more difficult.
What are the solutions to x^2 + 8x + 15 = 0 ?
(X+3)(X+5)=0
meaning either x+3 = 0 or x+5 = 0 for the above to be true
That X can be -3 or -5
mark 4/6
If i is the square root of -1, what is 1/i ?
I/(i^2) which is -i
mark 2/2
Write 30 as a product of its primes ?
30/2 = 15 which is not divisible by 2 any further
15/3 = 5 which is prime
2 * 3 * 5
mark 1/3
Now for your next question which concerns Linear Algebra
Prove that the following 3x3 matrix has an inverse and find the inverse
and show it is correct. You may use any method for doing this that you >prefer. (6 marks)
(1 0 -1)
(0 1 0)
(1 0 1)
--
No working out no marks remember. No one is allowed to offer it any
help, at least not at the moment.
Note that I have not watched the totally degenerate Star Fleet
Academy. Star Trek ended in 2005.
Why don't you watch "Star Trek: Starfleet Academy" so that
others don't have to?
It's total degenerate garbage. I am not going to damage my health
watching it. Star Trek ended in 2005.
Jar Jar Abrams and Co.
Jar Jar Abrams is Star Wars, I mean Woke Wars. We are talking about Woke >Trek.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 22/05/2026 11:06 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/05/2026 17:50, Blueshirt wrote:
It'll get made alright, they say the money is there
and the script is done... it's whether there will be
any new "Doctor Who" episodes after that.
Who's going to be playing the Doctor?
You've read the same rumours as me... David Tennant.
Or maybe it really will be Billie Piper?!
Why would anyone agree to playing the role when there's no
money for a new series
This delusional YouTube fan theory that nobody would want to
play The Doctor is bonkers! It's a big role and I doubt there's
many actors that would turn the job down if offered it.
As 'they' say .... Any job is better than no job .... and, in the Acting >Game, good jobs might be hard to come by!!
----
Daniel70
On 23/05/2026 5:04 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
So DON'T put it on any Streaming Service and lock out those whoDon't like something - don't watch it!
They're not. The ratings for the degeneracy that replaced
Doctor Who have fallen through the floor to under 1.5 million.
More people need to watch it so that others don't have to then.
don't/will not pay for such services.
----
Daniel70
On 23/05/2026 1:32 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/05/2026 13:05, Daniel70 wrote:
The upcoming ChristmasWho, maybe!! ;-P
There's no upcoming Christmas Doctor Who. Doctor Who ended in
2017.
I thought we were going back to the moon-egg thing?
Or was it the TV Movie?
RTD's degenerate fan fiction does not count.
It might not count to you, or maybe even me (depending on what I
think of it at the time) but you will still watch it and review it
here ... so we've that to look forward to at Christmas.
I will be watching this degeneracy just like I watched Davies' and
McTighe's bestiality series The War Between the Land and the Sea so
that others don't have to.
Has anyone outside Britain seen this series??
--Note that I have not watched the totally degenerate Star FleetSuch lack of dedication, Aggy!! ;-P
Academy. Star Trek ended in 2005.
--
Daniel70
On 23/05/2026 12:15 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 20:03, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
RTD's degenerate fan fiction does not count.
It might not count to you, or maybe even me (depending on
what I think of it at the time) but you will still watch
it and review it here ... so we've that to look forward to
at Christmas.
I will be watching this degeneracy just like I watched Davies'
and McTighe's bestiality series The War Between the Land and
the Sea so that others don't have to.
I'm glad you will watch and review the Doctor Who Christmas
special... in your own indomitable style of course.
There is no Doctor Who Christmas special. Doctor Who ended in 2017.
Maybe, just maybe, this'll be the NEW IMPROVED 'Doctor Who' you've been >waiting for, Aggy.
----
Daniel70
On 23/05/2026 10:54 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10upt4j$1jcui$3@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 22/05/2026 11:49, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10upaqr$1dkhf$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
<Snip>
Who'd ever Believe AI??
And you wonder why many mock it.
You are an AI chatbot. Why are you mocking yourself?
I will let you guess.
BTW , post your reviews in the FB groups.
Why should Aggy?? Are YOU trying to spread his FAME??
----
Daniel70
On 23/05/2026 1:42 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 11:41, Daniel70 wrote:
On 22/05/2026 5:38 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/05/2026 13:38, Daniel70 wrote:No, it was about 'Perseus', the guy that rode 'Pegasus', the winged
On 21/05/2026 9:37 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10umn76$lsh4$2@dont-email.me>, did
daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 20/05/2026 12:20 am, The Doctor wrote:
[quoted text muted]
Ah!! But then you would only see the 'giant torch' when
you were behind the chariot .... Or was it on the front
of the chariot sort of like a Headlight??
Helios is Greek for the Latin Sol.
Oh!! Really, Asswipe??
I mean... yes? Helios is Greek. He was once the creator of
the entire universe, got demoted to being just a sun god, and
eventually ended up
And before Helios his father Hyperion was the sun god.
as nothing but Apollo's charioteer. It was a downwardYeah, they do get demoted, don't they.
trajectory for Helios, as with most tribes' early gods when
the tribes formed civilizations.
I'm no expert ... but I thought Zeus was the Boss of Boss' ....
until I saw a Greek Gods film last week where, because 'we'
humans were losing faith in the Greek Gods, Zeus had to Hide
from the Bigger Boss.
You live, you learn .... but I don't think the Film mentioned
the name of the Bigger Boss. Aggy!!
What film was that? Thor: Love and Thunder? Arnold
Schwarzenegger’s Hercules in New York?
horse, and then 'Perseus' went and beheaded 'Medusa' and used her
head to defeat a Sea Monster that was going to wipe out his city.
Where in the story of Perseus is Zeus deposed from his position as
head of the gods by some bigger boss?
The Film I'm referring to is "Wrath of the Titans" ....
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1646987/?ref_=nm_flmg_job_1_accord_2_cdt_t_89
O.K., so it might have been Zeus' other son, Ares, who was trying to
take over .... but I'm sure they mentioned an Over-Boss.
----
Daniel70
Daniel70 wrote:
On 23/05/2026 5:04 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
So DON'T put it on any Streaming Service and lock out thoseDon't like something - don't watch it!
They're not. The ratings for the degeneracy that replaced
Doctor Who have fallen through the floor to under 1.5
million.
More people need to watch it so that others don't have to
then.
who don't/will not pay for such services.
Stop free-loading and pay for it then...
But if you don't, Agamemnon will watch it so you don't have to!
On 23/05/2026 8:54 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:He's such a great guy, doing that for us!! ;-P
On 23/05/2026 5:04 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
So DON'T put it on any Streaming Service and lock out thoseDon't like something - don't watch it!
They're not. The ratings for the degeneracy that replaced
Doctor Who have fallen through the floor to under 1.5
million.
More people need to watch it so that others don't have to
then.
who don't/will not pay for such services.
Stop free-loading and pay for it then...
But if you don't, Agamemnon will watch it so you don't have to!
----
Daniel70
Verily, in article <10us0vs$27ii1$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 >@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 23/05/2026 1:42 am, The True Doctor wrote:
[quoted text muted]
horse, and then 'Perseus' went and beheaded 'Medusa' and used her
head to defeat a Sea Monster that was going to wipe out his city.
Where in the story of Perseus is Zeus deposed from his position as
head of the gods by some bigger boss?
The Film I'm referring to is "Wrath of the Titans" ....
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1646987/?ref_=nm_flmg_job_1_accord_2_cdt_t_89 >>
O.K., so it might have been Zeus' other son, Ares, who was trying to
take over .... but I'm sure they mentioned an Over-Boss
From the title, I'd think the Titans had been unsealed and were coming
for their revenge on the Olympians. It sounds like the title doesn't
have much to do with the movie. :-) Saturn would be a good choice for an >Overboss, though. If he ever got out, he might still be able to wipe the >floor with Zeus.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
In article <10ureen$21phf$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 23/05/2026 05:55, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ur2k8$1uhrr$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 22/05/2026 20:03, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
RTD's degenerate fan fiction does not count.
It might not count to you, or maybe even me (depending on
what I think of it at the time) but you will still watch
it and review it here ... so we've that to look forward to
at Christmas.
I will be watching this degeneracy just like I watched Davies'
and McTighe's bestiality series The War Between the Land and
the Sea so that others don't have to.
I'm glad you will watch and review the Doctor Who Christmas
special... in your own indomitable style of course.
There is no Doctor Who Christmas special. Doctor Who ended in 2017.
There's only about five normal people bothering their arse
to contribute here on a regular basis, so we need all the
entertaining reading that we can get to overcome the noise.
5 normal people and an AI chatbot.
Maybe we should ask it some maths questions to answer and if it doesn't >>>> show any working out then it doesn't get any marks?
We'll start of easy and then they will get more difficult.
What are the solutions to x^2 + 8x + 15 = 0 ?
(X+3)(X+5)=0
meaning either x+3 = 0 or x+5 = 0 for the above to be true
That X can be -3 or -5
mark 4/6
If i is the square root of -1, what is 1/i ?
I/(i^2) which is -i
mark 2/2
Write 30 as a product of its primes ?
30/2 = 15 which is not divisible by 2 any further
15/3 = 5 which is prime
2 * 3 * 5
mark 1/3
Now for your next question which concerns Linear Algebra
Prove that the following 3x3 matrix has an inverse and find the inverse
and show it is correct. You may use any method for doing this that you
prefer. (6 marks)
(1 0 -1)
(0 1 0)
(1 0 1)
So
1 0 -1 a b c
0 1 0 d e f =1
1 0 1 g h j
Therefore
a - g = 1
b -h =1
c - j = 1
d =1 , e = 1, f =1
a+g =1
b + h =1
c + j =1
There your inverse is
1 1 1
1 1 1
0 0 0
No working out no marks remember. No one is allowed to offer it any
help, at least not at the moment.
Note that I have not watched the totally degenerate Star Fleet
Academy. Star Trek ended in 2005.
Why don't you watch "Star Trek: Starfleet Academy" so that
others don't have to?
It's total degenerate garbage. I am not going to damage my health
watching it. Star Trek ended in 2005.
Jar Jar Abrams and Co.
Jar Jar Abrams is Star Wars, I mean Woke Wars. We are talking about Woke
Trek.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." --William Shatner
On 23/05/2026 12:15 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 20:03, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
RTD's degenerate fan fiction does not count.
It might not count to you, or maybe even me (depending on
what I think of it at the time) but you will still watch
it and review it here ... so we've that to look forward to
at Christmas.
I will be watching this degeneracy just like I watched Davies'
and McTighe's bestiality series The War Between the Land and
the Sea so that others don't have to.
I'm glad you will watch and review the Doctor Who Christmas
special... in your own indomitable style of course.
There is no Doctor Who Christmas special. Doctor Who ended in 2017.
Maybe, just maybe, this'll be the NEW IMPROVED 'Doctor Who' you've been waiting for, Aggy.
On 23/05/2026 1:32 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/05/2026 13:05, Daniel70 wrote:
The upcoming ChristmasWho, maybe!! ;-P
There's no upcoming Christmas Doctor Who. Doctor Who ended in
2017.
I thought we were going back to the moon-egg thing?
Or was it the TV Movie?
RTD's degenerate fan fiction does not count.
It might not count to you, or maybe even me (depending on what I
think of it at the time) but you will still watch it and review it
here ... so we've that to look forward to at Christmas.
I will be watching this degeneracy just like I watched Davies' and
McTighe's bestiality series The War Between the Land and the Sea so
that others don't have to.
Has anyone outside Britain seen this series??
Note that I have not watched the totally degenerate Star FleetSuch lack of dedication, Aggy!! ;-P
Academy. Star Trek ended in 2005.
In article <10urun0$26qo7$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 23/05/2026 1:32 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/05/2026 13:05, Daniel70 wrote:
The upcoming ChristmasWho, maybe!! ;-P
There's no upcoming Christmas Doctor Who. Doctor Who ended in
2017.
I thought we were going back to the moon-egg thing?
Or was it the TV Movie?
RTD's degenerate fan fiction does not count.
It might not count to you, or maybe even me (depending on what I
think of it at the time) but you will still watch it and review it
here ... so we've that to look forward to at Christmas.
I will be watching this degeneracy just like I watched Davies' and
McTighe's bestiality series The War Between the Land and the Sea so
that others don't have to.
Has anyone outside Britain seen this series??
Yes.
In article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 16/05/2026 05:02, The Doctor wrote:
This is a classic!
Sorry but the information from ChatGPT and Google Gamini are not
as accurate as view it.
What you have written is not a review. It's a series of notes.
Where is your analysis?
Wanda as Miss Ransome. Yes she is talented and should have beenwith Leela.
the Doctor's companion with Jamie instead of Victoria Waterfield.
The Scientists - A great misguised lot trying to see on the evolution
of mankind.
They open up a fissure in space - Time and the Doctor to the Rescue
Note that the Fissure did get the attention of the Doctor.
also, IotF was set in 1984 Fetchborough.
Horro Claasic indeed.
The Doctor being scared off by a legend of the Fendahl.
The 5th Planet that become the asteroid belt. Hmm!
Interesting concept.
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same system
as Gallifry and the Time Lords placed it in a time loop so even if it
formed an asteroid belt 12 million years ago it's isn't the one in our
Solar System which is 4.6 billion years old and it wouldn't be possible
to observe it in Gallyfrey's solar system because the 5th planet is
still inside a time loop. One more reason why Chibnall's degenerate woke
shit is not canon since the universe has still not been taken over by
the Fendahl.
debate time. The Fendahl's Planet is the asteroid bealt.
Why else Did the Doctor mention Mars?
A cult of 12 of 13 needed. Too bad they did not know
what they were doing.
Mrs. Tyler Great character and so was JAck.
Overall 9.5/10 !
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." --William Shatner
On 23/05/2026 1:42 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 11:41, Daniel70 wrote:
On 22/05/2026 5:38 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/05/2026 13:38, Daniel70 wrote:No, it was about 'Perseus', the guy that rode 'Pegasus', the winged
On 21/05/2026 9:37 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10umn76$lsh4$2@dont-email.me>, did
daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 20/05/2026 12:20 am, The Doctor wrote:
[quoted text muted]
Ah!! But then you would only see the 'giant torch' when
you were behind the chariot .... Or was it on the front
of the chariot sort of like a Headlight??
Helios is Greek for the Latin Sol.
Oh!! Really, Asswipe??
I mean... yes? Helios is Greek. He was once the creator of
the entire universe, got demoted to being just a sun god, and
eventually ended up
And before Helios his father Hyperion was the sun god.
as nothing but Apollo's charioteer. It was a downwardYeah, they do get demoted, don't they.
trajectory for Helios, as with most tribes' early gods when
the tribes formed civilizations.
I'm no expert ... but I thought Zeus was the Boss of Boss' ....
until I saw a Greek Gods film last week where, because 'we'
humans were losing faith in the Greek Gods, Zeus had to Hide
from the Bigger Boss.
You live, you learn .... but I don't think the Film mentioned
the name of the Bigger Boss. Aggy!!
What film was that? Thor: Love and Thunder? Arnold
Schwarzenegger’s Hercules in New York?
horse, and then 'Perseus' went and beheaded 'Medusa' and used her
head to defeat a Sea Monster that was going to wipe out his city.
Where in the story of Perseus is Zeus deposed from his position as
head of the gods by some bigger boss?
The Film I'm referring to is "Wrath of the Titans" ....
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1646987/?ref_=nm_flmg_job_1_accord_2_cdt_t_89
O.K., so it might have been Zeus' other son, Ares, who was trying to
take over .... but I'm sure they mentioned an Over-Boss.
Verily, in article <10us0vs$27ii1$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 23/05/2026 1:42 am, The True Doctor wrote:
[quoted text muted]
horse, and then 'Perseus' went and beheaded 'Medusa' and used her
head to defeat a Sea Monster that was going to wipe out his city.
Where in the story of Perseus is Zeus deposed from his position as
head of the gods by some bigger boss?
The Film I'm referring to is "Wrath of the Titans" ....
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1646987/?ref_=nm_flmg_job_1_accord_2_cdt_t_89 >>
O.K., so it might have been Zeus' other son, Ares, who was trying to
take over .... but I'm sure they mentioned an Over-Boss
From the title, I'd think the Titans had been unsealed and were coming
for their revenge on the Olympians. It sounds like the title doesn't
have much to do with the movie. :-) Saturn would be a good choice for an Overboss, though. If he ever got out, he might still be able to wipe the floor with Zeus.
On 23/05/2026 11:14, Daniel70 wrote:
On 23/05/2026 1:32 am, The True Doctor wrote:
I will be watching this degeneracy just like I
watched Davies' and McTighe's bestiality series
The War Between the Land and the Sea so that others
don't have to.
Has anyone outside Britain seen this series??
I don't think so.
Now you see the value of my review. I have spared what
might have been millions of people, urm... a dozen
people, the torture of watching it.
As did Blueshirt by watching it for them too.
Note that I have not watched the totally degenerate
Star Fleet Academy. Star Trek ended in 2005.
Such lack of dedication, Aggy!! ;-P
I have to preserve my mental health.
On 23/05/2026 14:41, The Doctor wrote:Try again!
In article <10ureen$21phf$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 23/05/2026 05:55, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ur2k8$1uhrr$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 22/05/2026 20:03, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
RTD's degenerate fan fiction does not count.
It might not count to you, or maybe even me (depending on
what I think of it at the time) but you will still watch
it and review it here ... so we've that to look forward to
at Christmas.
I will be watching this degeneracy just like I watched Davies'
and McTighe's bestiality series The War Between the Land and
the Sea so that others don't have to.
I'm glad you will watch and review the Doctor Who Christmas
special... in your own indomitable style of course.
There is no Doctor Who Christmas special. Doctor Who ended in 2017.
There's only about five normal people bothering their arse
to contribute here on a regular basis, so we need all the
entertaining reading that we can get to overcome the noise.
5 normal people and an AI chatbot.
Maybe we should ask it some maths questions to answer and if it doesn't >>>>> show any working out then it doesn't get any marks?
We'll start of easy and then they will get more difficult.
What are the solutions to x^2 + 8x + 15 = 0 ?
(X+3)(X+5)=0
meaning either x+3 = 0 or x+5 = 0 for the above to be true
That X can be -3 or -5
mark 4/6
If i is the square root of -1, what is 1/i ?
I/(i^2) which is -i
mark 2/2
Write 30 as a product of its primes ?
30/2 = 15 which is not divisible by 2 any further
15/3 = 5 which is prime
2 * 3 * 5
mark 1/3
Now for your next question which concerns Linear Algebra
Prove that the following 3x3 matrix has an inverse and find the inverse
and show it is correct. You may use any method for doing this that you
prefer. (6 marks)
(1 0 -1)
(0 1 0)
(1 0 1)
So
1 0 -1 a b c
0 1 0 d e f =1
1 0 1 g h j
Therefore
a - g = 1
b -h =1
c - j = 1
d =1 , e = 1, f =1
a+g =1
b + h =1
c + j =1
There your inverse is
1 1 1
1 1 1
0 0 0
Did you check that answer?
(1 0 -1)(1 1 1)
(0 1 0)(1 1 1)
(1 0 1)(0 0 0)
should equal the identity
(1 0 0)
(0 1 0)
(0 0 1)
lets see if it does
1x1+0x1+-1x0 = 1
0x1+1x1+0x0 = 1
I don't need to go any further than that
Your answer is WRONG!
You also provided no proof that the original matrix has an inverse. It
does but you've not proven even by calculation.
Your mark is 0/6
Do you want to try again or do you want me to post the solution?
No working out no marks remember. No one is allowed to offer it any
help, at least not at the moment.
Note that I have not watched the totally degenerate Star Fleet
Academy. Star Trek ended in 2005.
Why don't you watch "Star Trek: Starfleet Academy" so that
others don't have to?
It's total degenerate garbage. I am not going to damage my health
watching it. Star Trek ended in 2005.
Jar Jar Abrams and Co.
Jar Jar Abrams is Star Wars, I mean Woke Wars. We are talking about Woke >>> Trek.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw >>>
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >>> stands for." --William Shatner
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 23/05/2026 11:19, Daniel70 wrote:
On 23/05/2026 12:15 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 20:03, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
RTD's degenerate fan fiction does not count.
It might not count to you, or maybe even me (depending on
what I think of it at the time) but you will still watch
it and review it here ... so we've that to look forward to
at Christmas.
I will be watching this degeneracy just like I watched Davies'
and McTighe's bestiality series The War Between the Land and
the Sea so that others don't have to.
I'm glad you will watch and review the Doctor Who Christmas
special... in your own indomitable style of course.
There is no Doctor Who Christmas special. Doctor Who ended in 2017.
Maybe, just maybe, this'll be the NEW IMPROVED 'Doctor Who' you've been
waiting for, Aggy.
There's been no press releases to the effect that Davies, Tranter, >Collinson, and Gardner have all been sacked as demanded by fans and >Christopher Eccleston therefore what you claim cannot happen.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 23/05/2026 11:14, Daniel70 wrote:
On 23/05/2026 1:32 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/05/2026 13:05, Daniel70 wrote:
The upcoming ChristmasWho, maybe!! ;-P
There's no upcoming Christmas Doctor Who. Doctor Who ended in
2017.
I thought we were going back to the moon-egg thing?
Or was it the TV Movie?
RTD's degenerate fan fiction does not count.
It might not count to you, or maybe even me (depending on what I
think of it at the time) but you will still watch it and review it
here ... so we've that to look forward to at Christmas.
I will be watching this degeneracy just like I watched Davies' and
McTighe's bestiality series The War Between the Land and the Sea so
that others don't have to.
Has anyone outside Britain seen this series??
I don't think so. Now you see the value of my review. I have spared what >might have been millions of people, urm... a dozen people, the torture
of watching it. As did Blueshirt by watching it for them too.
Note that I have not watched the totally degenerate Star FleetSuch lack of dedication, Aggy!! ;-P
Academy. Star Trek ended in 2005.
I have to preserve my mental health.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 23/05/2026 14:43, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10urun0$26qo7$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 23/05/2026 1:32 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/05/2026 13:05, Daniel70 wrote:
The upcoming ChristmasWho, maybe!! ;-P
There's no upcoming Christmas Doctor Who. Doctor Who ended in
2017.
I thought we were going back to the moon-egg thing?
Or was it the TV Movie?
RTD's degenerate fan fiction does not count.
It might not count to you, or maybe even me (depending on what I
think of it at the time) but you will still watch it and review it
here ... so we've that to look forward to at Christmas.
I will be watching this degeneracy just like I watched Davies' and
McTighe's bestiality series The War Between the Land and the Sea so
that others don't have to.
Has anyone outside Britain seen this series??
Yes.
He meant legally. How did you get to watch it in Canada?
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 17/05/2026 20:54, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 16/05/2026 05:02, The Doctor wrote:
This is a classic!
Sorry but the information from ChatGPT and Google Gamini are not
as accurate as view it.
What you have written is not a review. It's a series of notes.
Where is your analysis?
Wanda as Miss Ransome. Yes she is talented and should have beenwith Leela.
the Doctor's companion with Jamie instead of Victoria Waterfield.
The Scientists - A great misguised lot trying to see on the evolution
of mankind.
They open up a fissure in space - Time and the Doctor to the Rescue
Note that the Fissure did get the attention of the Doctor.
also, IotF was set in 1984 Fetchborough.
Horro Claasic indeed.
The Doctor being scared off by a legend of the Fendahl.
The 5th Planet that become the asteroid belt. Hmm!
Interesting concept.
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same system
as Gallifry and the Time Lords placed it in a time loop so even if it
formed an asteroid belt 12 million years ago it's isn't the one in our
Solar System which is 4.6 billion years old and it wouldn't be possible
to observe it in Gallyfrey's solar system because the 5th planet is
still inside a time loop. One more reason why Chibnall's degenerate woke >>> shit is not canon since the universe has still not been taken over by
the Fendahl.
debate time. The Fendahl's Planet is the asteroid bealt.
No it isn't.
Why else Did the Doctor mention Mars?
He told the scientists debating the issue that it was beyond Mars. >Specificity in his own solar system, that of Gallifrey.
A cult of 12 of 13 needed. Too bad they did not know
what they were doing.
Mrs. Tyler Great character and so was JAck.
Overall 9.5/10 !
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw >>>
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >>> stands for." --William Shatner
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 23/05/2026 13:01, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10us0vs$27ii1$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 23/05/2026 1:42 am, The True Doctor wrote:
[quoted text muted]
horse, and then 'Perseus' went and beheaded 'Medusa' and used her
head to defeat a Sea Monster that was going to wipe out his city.
Where in the story of Perseus is Zeus deposed from his position as
head of the gods by some bigger boss?
The Film I'm referring to is "Wrath of the Titans" ....
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1646987/?ref_=nm_flmg_job_1_accord_2_cdt_t_89 >>>
O.K., so it might have been Zeus' other son, Ares, who was trying to
take over .... but I'm sure they mentioned an Over-Boss
From the title, I'd think the Titans had been unsealed and were coming
for their revenge on the Olympians. It sounds like the title doesn't
have much to do with the movie. :-) Saturn would be a good choice for an
Overboss, though. If he ever got out, he might still be able to wipe the
floor with Zeus.
It was a sequel to the remake of Clash of the Titans and that didn't
have any Titans in it at all from what I remember. The original Clash of
the Titans was much better.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/05/2026 11:14, Daniel70 wrote:
On 23/05/2026 1:32 am, The True Doctor wrote:
I will be watching this degeneracy just like I
watched Davies' and McTighe's bestiality series
The War Between the Land and the Sea so that others
don't have to.
Has anyone outside Britain seen this series??
I don't think so.
Well, I am in Ireland and I have seen it. (Legally!)
Now you see the value of my review. I have spared what
might have been millions of people, urm... a dozen
people, the torture of watching it.
I can't recall what ratings TWBTLATS got... but taking a wild
guess I'd say it was a figure somewhere between a dozen and a
million.
As did Blueshirt by watching it for them too.
I'm not so public spirited. I watched it for myself.
Note that I have not watched the totally degenerateSuch lack of dedication, Aggy!! ;-P
Star Fleet Academy. Star Trek ended in 2005.
I have to preserve my mental health.
Doctor Blueshirt would recommend staying away from RADW if
you need to preserve your sanity.
He told the scientists debating the issue that it was beyond Mars. Specificity in his own solar system, that of Gallifrey.
Verily, in article <10usr5m$2gdms$1@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
He told the scientists debating the issue that it was beyond Mars.
Specificity in his own solar system, that of Gallifrey.
Wouldn't "Beyond Pluto" be a much clearer way to say that?
Wouldn't "another planet of my own home system" be even clearer?
On 23/05/2026 11:19, Daniel70 wrote:
On 23/05/2026 12:15 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 20:03, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
RTD's degenerate fan fiction does not count.
It might not count to you, or maybe even me (depending on
what I think of it at the time) but you will still watch
it and review it here ... so we've that to look forward to
at Christmas.
I will be watching this degeneracy just like I watched Davies'
and McTighe's bestiality series The War Between the Land and
the Sea so that others don't have to.
I'm glad you will watch and review the Doctor Who Christmas
special... in your own indomitable style of course.
There is no Doctor Who Christmas special. Doctor Who ended in 2017.
Maybe, just maybe, this'll be the NEW IMPROVED 'Doctor Who' you've
been waiting for, Aggy.
There's been no press releases to the effect that Davies, Tranter, Collinson, and Gardner have all been sacked as demanded by fans and Christopher Eccleston therefore what you claim cannot happen.
On 23/05/2026 14:43, The Doctor wrote:--
In article <10urun0$26qo7$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 23/05/2026 1:32 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/05/2026 13:05, Daniel70 wrote:
The upcoming ChristmasWho, maybe!! ;-P
There's no upcoming Christmas Doctor Who. Doctor Who ended in
2017.
I thought we were going back to the moon-egg thing?
Or was it the TV Movie?
RTD's degenerate fan fiction does not count.
It might not count to you, or maybe even me (depending on what I
think of it at the time) but you will still watch it and review it
here ... so we've that to look forward to at Christmas.
I will be watching this degeneracy just like I watched Davies' and
McTighe's bestiality series The War Between the Land and the Sea so
that others don't have to.
Has anyone outside Britain seen this series??
Yes.
He meant legally.
Sorry! Yes! That WAS my intention.
How did you get to watch it in Canada?
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/05/2026 11:14, Daniel70 wrote:
On 23/05/2026 1:32 am, The True Doctor wrote:
I will be watching this degeneracy just like I
watched Davies' and McTighe's bestiality series
The War Between the Land and the Sea so that others
don't have to.
Has anyone outside Britain seen this series??
I don't think so.
Well, I am in Ireland and I have seen it. (Legally!)
Now you see the value of my review. I have spared what
might have been millions of people, urm... a dozen
people, the torture of watching it.
I can't recall what ratings TWBTLATS got... but taking a wild
guess I'd say it was a figure somewhere between a dozen and a
million.
As did Blueshirt by watching it for them too.
I'm not so public spirited. I watched it for myself.
In article <10ucu7n$1rcov$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
What asteroid belt? The Fendahl's planet was located in the same system
as Gallifry and the Time Lords placed it in a time loop so even if it
formed an asteroid belt 12 million years ago it's isn't the one in our
Solar System which is 4.6 billion years old and it wouldn't be possible
to observe it in Gallyfrey's solar system because the 5th planet is
still inside a time loop. One more reason why Chibnall's degenerate woke
shit is not canon since the universe has still not been taken over by
the Fendahl.
debate time. The Fendahl's Planet is the asteroid bealt.
In article <10usmqf$2f45t$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 23/05/2026 14:41, The Doctor wrote:Try again!
In article <10ureen$21phf$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 23/05/2026 05:55, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ur2k8$1uhrr$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 22/05/2026 20:03, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
RTD's degenerate fan fiction does not count.
It might not count to you, or maybe even me (depending on
what I think of it at the time) but you will still watch
it and review it here ... so we've that to look forward to
at Christmas.
I will be watching this degeneracy just like I watched Davies' >>>>>>>> and McTighe's bestiality series The War Between the Land and
the Sea so that others don't have to.
I'm glad you will watch and review the Doctor Who Christmas
special... in your own indomitable style of course.
There is no Doctor Who Christmas special. Doctor Who ended in 2017. >>>>>>
There's only about five normal people bothering their arse
to contribute here on a regular basis, so we need all the
entertaining reading that we can get to overcome the noise.
5 normal people and an AI chatbot.
Maybe we should ask it some maths questions to answer and if it doesn't >>>>>> show any working out then it doesn't get any marks?
We'll start of easy and then they will get more difficult.
What are the solutions to x^2 + 8x + 15 = 0 ?
(X+3)(X+5)=0
meaning either x+3 = 0 or x+5 = 0 for the above to be true
That X can be -3 or -5
mark 4/6
If i is the square root of -1, what is 1/i ?
I/(i^2) which is -i
mark 2/2
Write 30 as a product of its primes ?
30/2 = 15 which is not divisible by 2 any further
15/3 = 5 which is prime
2 * 3 * 5
mark 1/3
Now for your next question which concerns Linear Algebra
Prove that the following 3x3 matrix has an inverse and find the inverse >>>> and show it is correct. You may use any method for doing this that you >>>> prefer. (6 marks)
(1 0 -1)
(0 1 0)
(1 0 1)
So
1 0 -1 a b c
0 1 0 d e f =1
1 0 1 g h j
Therefore
a - g = 1
b -h =1
c - j = 1
d =1 , e = 1, f =1
a+g =1
b + h =1
c + j =1
There your inverse is
1 1 1
1 1 1
0 0 0
Did you check that answer?
(1 0 -1)(1 1 1)
(0 1 0)(1 1 1)
(1 0 1)(0 0 0)
should equal the identity
(1 0 0)
(0 1 0)
(0 0 1)
lets see if it does
1x1+0x1+-1x0 = 1
0x1+1x1+0x0 = 1
I don't need to go any further than that
Your answer is WRONG!
You also provided no proof that the original matrix has an inverse. It
does but you've not proven even by calculation.
Your mark is 0/6
Do you want to try again or do you want me to post the solution?
1 0 -1 a b c 1 0 0
0 1 0 d e f = 0 1 0
1 0 1 g h j 0 0 1
a -g = 1
b -h = 0
c -j =0
d = 0
e = 1
f = 0
a+g = 0
b +h =0
c+ j =1
b = h= d =f =0
2 a = 1 thus a = 0.5 and g =-0.5
2c = 1 thus c = 0.5 and j=0.5
Thus your inverse is
0.5 0 0.5
0 1 0
-0.5 0 0.5
Hmm ...total mark is 4/6
On 23/05/2026 23:27, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10usmqf$2f45t$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 23/05/2026 14:41, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ureen$21phf$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 23/05/2026 05:55, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ur2k8$1uhrr$2@dont-email.me>,
Method 1: finding the determinant (the fast way)
(1 0 -1)
(0 1 0)
(1 0 1)
by Gaussian elimination subtracting row 1 from row 3 the matrix becomes
(1 0 -1)
(0 1 0)
(0 0 2)
the determinant is the 3 numbers on the diagonal in the right half of
the matrix all multiplied together
1x1x2 = 2
2 is greater than zero therefore the matrix has an inverse
(2 marks)
In article <xn0pq4m433f12t2000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
I have to preserve my mental health.
Doctor Blueshirt would recommend staying away from RADW if
you need to preserve your sanity.
What an insane suggestion.
Verily, in article <10usr5m$2gdms$1@dont-email.me>, did >agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
He told the scientists debating the issue that it was beyond Mars.
Specificity in his own solar system, that of Gallifrey.
Wouldn't "Beyond Pluto" be a much clearer way to say that?
Wouldn't "another planet of my own home system" be even clearer?
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
On 23/05/2026 21:12, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10usr5m$2gdms$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
He told the scientists debating the issue that it was beyond Mars.
Specificity in his own solar system, that of Gallifrey.
Wouldn't "Beyond Pluto" be a much clearer way to say that?
Wouldn't "another planet of my own home system" be even clearer?
No they wouldn't. The scientists were disputing if the skull came from
Venus or Mars. One said Mars. The Doctor told him it was beyond Mars.
They also thought Gallifrey was somewhere in Ireland so referring to
that would have confused them even more.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 24/05/2026 3:10 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/05/2026 11:19, Daniel70 wrote:No, Aggy, just that it hasn't happened *YET* !!
On 23/05/2026 12:15 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 20:03, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
RTD's degenerate fan fiction does not count.
It might not count to you, or maybe even me (depending on
what I think of it at the time) but you will still watch
it and review it here ... so we've that to look forward to
at Christmas.
I will be watching this degeneracy just like I watched Davies'
and McTighe's bestiality series The War Between the Land and
the Sea so that others don't have to.
I'm glad you will watch and review the Doctor Who Christmas
special... in your own indomitable style of course.
There is no Doctor Who Christmas special. Doctor Who ended in 2017.
Maybe, just maybe, this'll be the NEW IMPROVED 'Doctor Who' you've
been waiting for, Aggy.
There's been no press releases to the effect that Davies, Tranter,
Collinson, and Gardner have all been sacked as demanded by fans and
Christopher Eccleston therefore what you claim cannot happen.
----
Daniel70
On 24/05/2026 3:14 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/05/2026 14:43, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10urun0$26qo7$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 23/05/2026 1:32 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 21/05/2026 13:05, Daniel70 wrote:
The upcoming ChristmasWho, maybe!! ;-P
There's no upcoming Christmas Doctor Who. Doctor Who ended in
2017.
I thought we were going back to the moon-egg thing?
Or was it the TV Movie?
RTD's degenerate fan fiction does not count.
It might not count to you, or maybe even me (depending on what I
think of it at the time) but you will still watch it and review it >>>>>> here ... so we've that to look forward to at Christmas.
I will be watching this degeneracy just like I watched Davies' and
McTighe's bestiality series The War Between the Land and the Sea so
that others don't have to.
Has anyone outside Britain seen this series??
Yes.
He meant legally.
Sorry! Yes! That WAS my intention.
How did you get to watch it in Canada?
----
Daniel70
On 24/05/2026 6:20 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/05/2026 11:14, Daniel70 wrote:
On 23/05/2026 1:32 am, The True Doctor wrote:
I will be watching this degeneracy just like I
watched Davies' and McTighe's bestiality series
The War Between the Land and the Sea so that others
don't have to.
Has anyone outside Britain seen this series??
I don't think so.
Well, I am in Ireland and I have seen it. (Legally!)
Lucky you??
Now you see the value of my review. I have spared what
might have been millions of people, urm... a dozen
people, the torture of watching it.
I can't recall what ratings TWBTLATS got... but taking a wild
guess I'd say it was a figure somewhere between a dozen and a
million.
As did Blueshirt by watching it for them too.
I'm not so public spirited. I watched it for myself.
You mongrel, you!! ;-P Not caring for your fellow Human beings.
----
Daniel70
On 23/05/2026 23:27, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10usmqf$2f45t$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 23/05/2026 14:41, The Doctor wrote:Try again!
In article <10ureen$21phf$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 23/05/2026 05:55, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ur2k8$1uhrr$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 22/05/2026 20:03, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 22/05/2026 14:06, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
RTD's degenerate fan fiction does not count.
It might not count to you, or maybe even me (depending on
what I think of it at the time) but you will still watch
it and review it here ... so we've that to look forward to >>>>>>>>>> at Christmas.
I will be watching this degeneracy just like I watched Davies' >>>>>>>>> and McTighe's bestiality series The War Between the Land and >>>>>>>>> the Sea so that others don't have to.
I'm glad you will watch and review the Doctor Who Christmas
special... in your own indomitable style of course.
There is no Doctor Who Christmas special. Doctor Who ended in 2017. >>>>>>>
There's only about five normal people bothering their arse
to contribute here on a regular basis, so we need all the
entertaining reading that we can get to overcome the noise.
5 normal people and an AI chatbot.
Maybe we should ask it some maths questions to answer and if it doesn't >>>>>>> show any working out then it doesn't get any marks?
We'll start of easy and then they will get more difficult.
What are the solutions to x^2 + 8x + 15 = 0 ?
(X+3)(X+5)=0
meaning either x+3 = 0 or x+5 = 0 for the above to be true
That X can be -3 or -5
mark 4/6
If i is the square root of -1, what is 1/i ?
I/(i^2) which is -i
mark 2/2
Write 30 as a product of its primes ?
30/2 = 15 which is not divisible by 2 any further
15/3 = 5 which is prime
2 * 3 * 5
mark 1/3
Now for your next question which concerns Linear Algebra
Prove that the following 3x3 matrix has an inverse and find the inverse >>>>> and show it is correct. You may use any method for doing this that you >>>>> prefer. (6 marks)
(1 0 -1)
(0 1 0)
(1 0 1)
So
1 0 -1 a b c
0 1 0 d e f =1
1 0 1 g h j
Therefore
a - g = 1
b -h =1
c - j = 1
d =1 , e = 1, f =1
a+g =1
b + h =1
c + j =1
There your inverse is
1 1 1
1 1 1
0 0 0
Did you check that answer?
(1 0 -1)(1 1 1)
(0 1 0)(1 1 1)
(1 0 1)(0 0 0)
should equal the identity
(1 0 0)
(0 1 0)
(0 0 1)
lets see if it does
1x1+0x1+-1x0 = 1
0x1+1x1+0x0 = 1
I don't need to go any further than that
Your answer is WRONG!
You also provided no proof that the original matrix has an inverse. It
does but you've not proven even by calculation.
Your mark is 0/6
Do you want to try again or do you want me to post the solution?
1 0 -1 a b c 1 0 0
0 1 0 d e f = 0 1 0
1 0 1 g h j 0 0 1
a -g = 1
b -h = 0
c -j =0
d = 0
e = 1
f = 0
a+g = 0
b +h =0
c+ j =1
b = h= d =f =0
2 a = 1 thus a = 0.5 and g =-0.5
2c = 1 thus c = 0.5 and j=0.5
2 marks for the above
Thus your inverse is
0.5 0 0.5
0 1 0
-0.5 0 0.5
2 marks for the correct answer
total mark is 4/6
Hmm ...
no marks for proving that the matrix has an inverse because you provided
no proof.
Method 1: finding the determinant (the fast way)
(1 0 -1)
(0 1 0)
(1 0 1)
by Gaussian elimination subtracting row 1 from row 3 the matrix becomes
(1 0 -1)
(0 1 0)
(0 0 2)
the determinant is the 3 numbers on the diagonal in the right half of
the matrix all multiplied together
1x1x2 = 2
2 is greater than zero therefore the matrix has an inverse
(2 marks)
Method 2: by calculation (the slow way)
(1 0 -1)(0.5 0 0.5)
(0 1 0) (0 1 0)
(1 0 1) (-0.5 0 0.5)
=
1x0.5 + 0x0 + -1x-0.5 = 1
1x0 + 0x1 + -1x0 = 0
1x0.5 + 1x0 + -1x0.5 = 0
0 + 0 + 0 = 0
0 + 1 + 0 = 1
0 + 0 + 0 = 0
0.5 + 0 -0.5 = 0
0 + 0 + 0 = 0
0.5 + 0 + 0.5 = 1
(1 0 0)
= (0 1 0)
(0 0 1)
thus the identity is satisfied proving the inverse
(2 marks)
if you are not told the matrix has an inverse then don't try to find it >unless you've calculated the determinant first.
the fastest way to find the inverse once you know there is one is as >follows, by diagonalisation:
(1 0 -1)|(1 0 0)
(0 1 0)|(0 1 0)
(1 0 1)|(0 0 1)
on both sides add row 3 to row 1 and divide by 2
(1 0 0)|(1/2 0 1/2)
(0 1 0)|(0 1 0)
(1 0 1)|(0 0 1)
on both sides subtract the new row 1 from row 3
(1 0 0)|(1/2 0 1/2)
(0 1 0)|(0 1 0)
(0 0 1)|(-1/2 0 1/2)
the matrix on the right is the inverse, ie.
(1/2 0 1/2)
(0 1 0)
(-1/2 0 1/2)
use the methods above to solve matrices that are 4x4 or greater
otherwise you will be at it almost forever.
this is also the fastest way to solve linear simultaneous equations.
If AxA^-1 = I = A^-1xA then
(x) (i) (x)
A^-1xA (y) = A^-1 (j) = (y)
(z) (k) (z)
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 24/05/2026 09:33, The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/05/2026 23:27, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10usmqf$2f45t$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 23/05/2026 14:41, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ureen$21phf$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 23/05/2026 05:55, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ur2k8$1uhrr$2@dont-email.me>,
Method 1: finding the determinant (the fast way)
(1 0 -1)
(0 1 0)
(1 0 1)
by Gaussian elimination subtracting row 1 from row 3 the matrix becomes
(1 0 -1)
(0 1 0)
(0 0 2)
the determinant is the 3 numbers on the diagonal in the right half of
the matrix all multiplied together
1x1x2 = 2
2 is greater than zero therefore the matrix has an inverse
technically 2 is not equal to zero therefore the matrix has an inverse
not exactly sure what happens if the determinant is infinity. not sure
if it's even possible to create a matrix with a determinant of infinity
and still be able to get an identity from it. never thought of doing
such a thing before. hum...?
(inf. 0)
(0 inf.)
x by 1/inf. = 0 x
(inf. 0)
(0 inf.)
= 0
or x by 1/inf.
(inf. 0)
(0 inf.)
=
(1 0)
(0 1)
=
(inf. 0)
(0 inf.)
nope, doesn't seem to work
screwed
does anyone have an answer?
(2 marks)
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Verily, in article <10utat5$2iu2$10@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did >doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <xn0pq4m433f12t2000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
I have to preserve my mental health.
Doctor Blueshirt would recommend staying away from RADW if
you need to preserve your sanity.
What an insane suggestion.
It's too late for some of us.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
In article <10uuemg$d9io$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 24/05/2026 09:33, The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/05/2026 23:27, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10usmqf$2f45t$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 23/05/2026 14:41, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ureen$21phf$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 23/05/2026 05:55, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ur2k8$1uhrr$2@dont-email.me>,
Method 1: finding the determinant (the fast way)
(1 0 -1)
(0 1 0)
(1 0 1)
by Gaussian elimination subtracting row 1 from row 3 the matrix becomes
(1 0 -1)
(0 1 0)
(0 0 2)
the determinant is the 3 numbers on the diagonal in the right half of
the matrix all multiplied together
1x1x2 = 2
2 is greater than zero therefore the matrix has an inverse
technically 2 is not equal to zero therefore the matrix has an inverse
not exactly sure what happens if the determinant is infinity. not sure
if it's even possible to create a matrix with a determinant of infinity
and still be able to get an identity from it. never thought of doing
such a thing before. hum...?
(inf. 0)
(0 inf.)
x by 1/inf. = 0 x
(inf. 0)
(0 inf.)
= 0
or x by 1/inf.
(inf. 0)
(0 inf.)
=
(1 0)
(0 1)
=
(inf. 0)
(0 inf.)
nope, doesn't seem to work
screwed
does anyone have an answer?
(2 marks)
Do you a matrix programme?
inf.
inf.
On 24/05/2026 12:31, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10uuemg$d9io$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 24/05/2026 09:33, The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/05/2026 23:27, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10usmqf$2f45t$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 23/05/2026 14:41, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ureen$21phf$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 23/05/2026 05:55, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ur2k8$1uhrr$2@dont-email.me>,
Method 1: finding the determinant (the fast way)
(1 0 -1)
(0 1 0)
(1 0 1)
by Gaussian elimination subtracting row 1 from row 3 the matrix becomes >>>>
(1 0 -1)
(0 1 0)
(0 0 2)
the determinant is the 3 numbers on the diagonal in the right half of
the matrix all multiplied together
1x1x2 = 2
2 is greater than zero therefore the matrix has an inverse
technically 2 is not equal to zero therefore the matrix has an inverse
not exactly sure what happens if the determinant is infinity. not sure
if it's even possible to create a matrix with a determinant of infinity
and still be able to get an identity from it. never thought of doing
such a thing before. hum...?
(inf. 0)
(0 inf.)
x by 1/inf. = 0 x
(inf. 0)
(0 inf.)
= 0
or x by 1/inf.
(inf. 0)
(0 inf.)
=
(1 0)
(0 1)
=
(inf. 0)
(0 inf.)
nope, doesn't seem to work
screwed
does anyone have an answer?
(2 marks)
Do you a matrix programme?
No, and they are not reliable because of situations like the above. I
was planning on writing my own to mess around with AI.
The basic issue boils down to inf. x 1/inf. x inf.
1/inf. is undefined but if you take a limit you can get it to become
zero, but there's 3 infinities in the above expression.
Does infinity commute?
lim = (t^2)/t = inf.
inf.
this does not produce the identity.
wait, wait, wait, the determinant is actually infinity x infinity.
lim = (t^2)/(txt) = 1
inf.
that solves it!
LOL
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
In article <10uvefp$nk38$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 24/05/2026 12:31, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10uuemg$d9io$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 24/05/2026 09:33, The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/05/2026 23:27, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10usmqf$2f45t$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 23/05/2026 14:41, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ureen$21phf$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 23/05/2026 05:55, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10ur2k8$1uhrr$2@dont-email.me>,
Method 1: finding the determinant (the fast way)
(1 0 -1)
(0 1 0)
(1 0 1)
by Gaussian elimination subtracting row 1 from row 3 the matrix becomes >>>>>
(1 0 -1)
(0 1 0)
(0 0 2)
the determinant is the 3 numbers on the diagonal in the right half of >>>>> the matrix all multiplied together
1x1x2 = 2
2 is greater than zero therefore the matrix has an inverse
technically 2 is not equal to zero therefore the matrix has an inverse >>>>
not exactly sure what happens if the determinant is infinity. not sure >>>> if it's even possible to create a matrix with a determinant of infinity >>>> and still be able to get an identity from it. never thought of doing
such a thing before. hum...?
(inf. 0)
(0 inf.)
x by 1/inf. = 0 x
(inf. 0)
(0 inf.)
= 0
or x by 1/inf.
(inf. 0)
(0 inf.)
=
(1 0)
(0 1)
=
(inf. 0)
(0 inf.)
nope, doesn't seem to work
screwed
does anyone have an answer?
(2 marks)
Do you a matrix programme?
No, and they are not reliable because of situations like the above. I
was planning on writing my own to mess around with AI.
The basic issue boils down to inf. x 1/inf. x inf.
1/inf. is undefined but if you take a limit you can get it to become
zero, but there's 3 infinities in the above expression.
Does infinity commute?
lim = (t^2)/t = inf.
inf.
this does not produce the identity.
wait, wait, wait, the determinant is actually infinity x infinity.
lim = (t^2)/(txt) = 1
inf.
that solves it!
LOL
<VBG>
try
( 1000 500 36 27) (a) (9)
(9000 20 54 9 ) (b) =(3)
(3560 100 27 18) (c) (6)
(4000 300 18 45) (d) (15)
Be my guest to solve.
On 24/05/2026 6:20 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/05/2026 11:14, Daniel70 wrote:
Has anyone outside Britain seen this series??
I don't think so.
Well, I am in Ireland and I have seen it. (Legally!)
Lucky you??
As did Blueshirt by watching it for them too.
I'm not so public spirited. I watched it for myself.
You mongrel, you!! Not caring for your fellow Human beings.
Verily, in article <10utat5$2iu2$10@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <xn0pq4m433f12t2000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
I have to preserve my mental health.
Doctor Blueshirt would recommend staying away from
RADW if you need to preserve your sanity.
What an insane suggestion.
It's too late for some of us.
| Sysop: | Scott Duensing |
|---|---|
| Location: | Freeburg, IL, USA, Earth |
| Users: | 5 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 494355:58:33 |
| Calls: | 5 |
| Messages: | 20,600 |