From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv
On Mon, 4 May 2026 12:33:19 -0400, Rhino
<
no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
I don't imagine the airport would be very keen on diverting incoming
planes to other airports or pausing takeoffs on a moment's notice when
there was a person nearby fleeing justice, just so that the police could >operate their helicopters (or "airships" as the LAPD call them).
I think any contingency plan would have to involve airport security
working with the local police or more likely just dispatching all police >cars near the airport. I imagine airport security would decline the >opportunity to participate if they are unarmed and management would not
want them to leave their normal duties if they were armed to perform a >manhunt because it would leave them without resources to handle issues
with travellers.
Perhaps, but I've seen planes land and passengers NOT allowed to
disembark as RCMP officers were coming on board. In this particular
case a very old passenger had had a fatal heart attack roughly 20
minutes before landing and the police were there to ensure the
ambulance attendants were able to get their gurney to the right row to
remove the departed lady from the aircraft. (I got too good a view of
this as I was seated two rows directly behind her)
After she was off the aircraft passengers were allowed to depart in
the usual way though when coming up the tunnel you saw the ambulance
attendants and officers waiting for the coast to clear. Presumably
since they had had time to verify that she was in fact gone there was
no urgency and that they went to the morgue rather than emergency.
--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2