• Thanks To Trump, Canada [& World] Is Loading Up On Top American Doctors and Scientists - Bleeding America Dry.

    From No More Science For You!@gaericans@trump.org to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,rec.arts.tv on Fri Aug 28 22:04:05 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On Thursday morning, Canada's Industry Minister stood at a lectern in Vancouver and calmly read out the names of sixty-four of the sharpest minds
    on the planet who now work for Canada.

    Nobody stormed a beach. Nobody sanctioned a bank. Everybody clapped, had a scone, and went back to work.

    Three-quarters of those names walked straight out of American institutions. Harvard. MIT. The best labs on Earth. Canada put half a billion dollars on
    the table, roughly a million a year for each of them for the next eight
    years, with another $37 million waiting to collect sixty-three more rising stars over the coming twelve months. The whole war chest was quietly stood
    up in December, back when half the world still thought the trade war was a bluff.

    And while the removal trucks were idling outside America's best
    universities, the President of the United States was in the Oval Office signing an executive order to rename a lake.

    That is genuinely where his head was.

    Here's the detail that should terrify Washington, and it's not the money. Congress actually blocked most of Trump's proposed cuts to American
    science. The courts stopped huge slabs of the rest. The budgets largely survived.

    The scientists left anyway.

    Because a budget line can be restored with one vote, but trust takes a
    decade of adult behaviour to rebuild, and nobody with a functioning lab and
    a career's worth of unfinished work is betting on Washington finding a
    decade of adult behaviour down the back of the couch. When Nature polled American scientists, three out of four said they were considering leaving
    the country. Canada just skimmed the first sixty-four off the top. The
    queue is still out the door.

    There's a precedent for this, and it's brutal. In the 1930s, when Europe's strongmen decided science was the enemy, Einstein got on a boat to America.
    So did Fermi. America took in the world's fleeing geniuses and built the atomic bomb, the space program, and the greatest scientific empire in
    history off the back of other countries' stupidity.

    That was the deal for ninety years: you produce a tyrant, America takes
    your geniuses.

    The boats are now heading north.

    The full piece has the names, the numbers, the bloody magnificent way
    Canada named the operation, what one astrophysicist's move really says
    about Boston, and exactly what this costs America a decade from now, long after the man responsible is gone.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mitchell Holman@noemail@aol.com to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,rec.arts.tv on Sat Aug 29 01:43:24 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    "No More Science For You!" <gaericans@trump.org> wrote in news:116t0kl$1bct5$15@news.tcpreset.net:

    On Thursday morning, Canada's Industry Minister stood at a lectern in Vancouver and calmly read out the names of sixty-four of the sharpest
    minds on the planet who now work for Canada.

    Nobody stormed a beach. Nobody sanctioned a bank. Everybody clapped,
    had a scone, and went back to work.

    Three-quarters of those names walked straight out of American
    institutions. Harvard. MIT. The best labs on Earth. Canada put half a
    billion dollars on the table, roughly a million a year for each of
    them for the next eight years, with another $37 million waiting to
    collect sixty-three more rising stars over the coming twelve months.
    The whole war chest was quietly stood up in December, back when half
    the world still thought the trade war was a bluff.

    And while the removal trucks were idling outside America's best universities, the President of the United States was in the Oval
    Office signing an executive order to rename a lake.

    That is genuinely where his head was.

    Here's the detail that should terrify Washington, and it's not the
    money. Congress actually blocked most of Trump's proposed cuts to
    American science. The courts stopped huge slabs of the rest. The
    budgets largely survived.

    The scientists left anyway.



    42% of the Nobel Prizes awarded to Americans
    were given to foreign nationals who came to the
    US for college and doctoral work. We benefitted
    from the world's "best and brightest" coming here
    and staying.

    Not any more............






    Because a budget line can be restored with one vote, but trust takes a
    decade of adult behaviour to rebuild, and nobody with a functioning
    lab and a career's worth of unfinished work is betting on Washington
    finding a decade of adult behaviour down the back of the couch. When
    Nature polled American scientists, three out of four said they were considering leaving the country. Canada just skimmed the first
    sixty-four off the top. The queue is still out the door.

    There's a precedent for this, and it's brutal. In the 1930s, when
    Europe's strongmen decided science was the enemy, Einstein got on a
    boat to America. So did Fermi. America took in the world's fleeing
    geniuses and built the atomic bomb, the space program, and the
    greatest scientific empire in history off the back of other countries' stupidity.

    That was the deal for ninety years: you produce a tyrant, America
    takes your geniuses.

    The boats are now heading north.

    The full piece has the names, the numbers, the bloody magnificent way
    Canada named the operation, what one astrophysicist's move really says
    about Boston, and exactly what this costs America a decade from now,
    long after the man responsible is gone.


    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From danny burstein@dannyb@panix.com to rec.arts.tv on Sat Aug 29 01:57:42 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    [snip]

    pointer to the full article, pleeeeeze? Thank you
    --
    _____________________________________________________
    Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
    dannyb@panix.com
    [to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rhino@no_offline_contact@example.com to rec.arts.tv on Sat Aug 29 00:07:55 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On 2026-08-28 9:57 p.m., danny burstein wrote:
    [snip]

    pointer to the full article, pleeeeeze? Thank you



    Here is one such article:

    https://universityaffairs.ca/news/ottawa-announces-64-new-research-chairs-in-international-talent-attraction-strategy/

    It actually identifies several of the researchers by name, which helps
    confirm a suspicion I have that this may be more of a DEI initiative
    than anything else. I've never heard of ANY of these people nor can I
    pretend to know anything about their qualifications but of the six
    people named, 5 of them appear to be women. And that lines up with
    recent academic practice in this country where many positions will not
    ACCEPT white male applicants regardless of qualifications.

    Again, I'm not saying these people are unqualified and I have no idea
    which of them are white but I would be very interested to see an article
    that gave us some stats on how many are female and/or non-white.

    These "top" doctors and scientists may only be minorities that aren't advancing as quickly as they want to in the US so they're taking a good
    deal here. Meanwhile, our government can tell a story about poaching the
    best of the best AND get bonus points for DEI hiring in academia.
    --
    Rhino
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Governor Swill@governor.swill@gmail.com to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,rec.arts.tv on Sat Aug 29 01:58:58 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On Fri, 28 Aug 2026 22:04:05 -0000 (UTC), "No More Science For You!"
    wrote:


    The full piece

    What piece?
    --
    Hegseth is a miserable failure
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Emily Postnews@imadick@forge.net to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,rec.arts.tv on Sat Aug 29 16:52:38 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote in news:XnsB4B6D26D8C111629555@ 185.151.15.109:

    "No More Science For You!" <gaericans@trump.org> wrote in news:116t0kl$1bct5$15@news.tcpreset.net:

    On Thursday morning, Canada's Industry Minister stood at a lectern in
    Vancouver and calmly read out the names of sixty-four of the sharpest
    minds on the planet who now work for Canada.

    Nobody stormed a beach. Nobody sanctioned a bank. Everybody clapped,
    had a scone, and went back to work.

    Three-quarters of those names walked straight out of American
    institutions. Harvard. MIT. The best labs on Earth. Canada put half a
    billion dollars on the table, roughly a million a year for each of
    them for the next eight years, with another $37 million waiting to
    collect sixty-three more rising stars over the coming twelve months.
    The whole war chest was quietly stood up in December, back when half
    the world still thought the trade war was a bluff.

    And while the removal trucks were idling outside America's best
    universities, the President of the United States was in the Oval
    Office signing an executive order to rename a lake.

    That is genuinely where his head was.

    Here's the detail that should terrify Washington, and it's not the
    money. Congress actually blocked most of Trump's proposed cuts to
    American science. The courts stopped huge slabs of the rest. The
    budgets largely survived.

    The scientists left anyway.



    42% of the Nobel Prizes awarded to Americans
    were given to foreign nationals who came to the
    US for college and doctoral work. We benefitted
    from the world's "best and brightest" coming here
    and staying.

    Not any more............






    Because a budget line can be restored with one vote, but trust takes
    a
    decade of adult behaviour to rebuild, and nobody with a functioning
    lab and a career's worth of unfinished work is betting on Washington
    finding a decade of adult behaviour down the back of the couch. When
    Nature polled American scientists, three out of four said they were
    considering leaving the country. Canada just skimmed the first
    sixty-four off the top. The queue is still out the door.

    There's a precedent for this, and it's brutal. In the 1930s, when
    Europe's strongmen decided science was the enemy, Einstein got on a
    boat to America. So did Fermi. America took in the world's fleeing
    geniuses and built the atomic bomb, the space program, and the
    greatest scientific empire in history off the back of other
    countries'
    stupidity.

    That was the deal for ninety years: you produce a tyrant, America
    takes your geniuses.

    The boats are now heading north.

    The full piece has the names, the numbers, the bloody magnificent way
    Canada named the operation, what one astrophysicist's move really
    says
    about Boston, and exactly what this costs America a decade from now,
    long after the man responsible is gone.




    Poster ID and public handle: Poster B (public handle: Mitchell Holman)

    Communication patterns:
    Observable: Medium-to-high activity, often responding with compact counterexamples, historical comparisons, or source corrections.
    Recurring topics:

    Observable: Trump/9-11, Marine One, trans-care debate, science brain
    drain, inflation, accountability.
    Interaction style:

    Observable: Direct rebuttal, often with short quoted blocks and a
    contrasting fact or link summary.
    Argumentation style:

    Observable: Evidence/citation-oriented; uses lists, dates, and
    comparisons.

    Emotional/expression patterns:
    Observable: Critical but generally more structured than many of the most abusive posts.

    Relationship to other participants:
    Observable: Responds to Posters J, Q, DN/T-related threads, and A-
    adjacent discussions.

    Communication-level stability observations:
    Observable: Stable fact-check/counterexample style.
    Strongest evidence:

    Observable: Marine One thread counters claims about pilot diversity;
    9/11 thread lists prior aid cuts and withdrawals; accountability post contrasts presidents’ responsibility statements.
    Alternative explanations:

    Interpretation: Selective citation reflects debate stance, not
    necessarily full-topic neutrality.

    Confidence level: High.
    What cannot reasonably be concluded:
    No real-world knowledge, affiliation, or personal identity beyond public handle.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2