The True Doctor wrote:
I mostly agree with Gareth Roberts suggestions, especially 10, 12, 13,
14, 15, 16, 19, and 20.
Suggestion 3 needs to be expanded because Doctor Who although it should
never ever be written for teenagers, it must always be written to appeal
to both children and adults simultaneously at different levels. This is
why the Tom Baker era is still re-watchable whereas the modern era is not.
I don't agree with 4. The main reason I got into Doctor Who was because
it was science-fiction and that it was based on science-fiction themes
such as using logic and reason to solve problems, adventure, and the
hero's journey, as well as other elements of speculative fiction such as horror. Because suggestion 10 rules out magic what Doctor Who is not is fantasy. It can contain fantastical elements but everything must always ultimately be explained by plausible science and basic scientific
principles can never be ignored.
Suggestion 2 needs to be made more precise. "Doctor Who is a British
show aimed squarely at a British audience which is overwhelmingly heterosexual, and being speculative fiction caters primarily for a male audience. Therefore, the Doctor must always be portrayed as a white, heterosexual, British male character to represent the majority of the audience. Everybody in Britain and everybody else prefers it that way."
<<
Gareth Roberts
Twenty ways to fix Doctor Who
https://spectator.com/article/twenty-ways-to-fix-doctor-who/
16 June 2026, 1:17am
Jodie Whittaker was the thirteenth and first female lead actor to play
the Doctor in Doctor Who (Alamy)
The BBC has binned its planned Doctor Who Christmas special and put the
show 'out to tender'. This is a face-saving TV industry term for saying you've kicked an ailing show into the longest of grass, but don't want
to enrage its most rabid fans. Good luck with that, chaps. Essentially
it translates as 'Somebody please, please take this nightmare off our
hands'. It's like one of those Facebook ads you see for a dog that needs rehousing because it barks all night, gnaws on toddlers, and has no
control of its bowels, but is a total sweetie, honestly.
I'd put Doctor Who on ice for at least a decade
If by some bizarre quirk of circumstance I found myself the unwilling
owner of the tender, I'd put Doctor Who on ice for at least a decade.
Much has been written in the past few days about what happened to poor
old Doctor Who, how the thing was revived in glory and then retoxified
in shame. As a former writer on Doctor Who, I was actually in the room
when some of the mistakes were made. I offer the following suggestions -
in a reflective but constructive spirit - for anybody barmy enough to
take the thing on. (And yes, I broke many of these 'rules' myself, but I
know better now.)
1. The character is called Dr Who, but nobody in the fiction knows that, probably not even him, so within it he's referred to as 'the Doctor'.
But his name is Dr Who. The public know this, and the public is always
right. Correcting the public on this obvious point - and billing him as
'The Doctor' on the end credits - makes a production look quite mad. Similarly, those who travel with Dr Who are his friends, or his
assistants. Not 'companions', which is positively Victorian and cringe-inducing.
2. Doctor Who is a British show aimed squarely at a British audience. Everybody else prefers it that way.
3. This is always, primarily, a children's show for ages five to 12. Everybody else is there on sufferance. Adults may well enjoy the
innovation. playfulness and whimsy, but teenagers must never be appealed
to. That way lies disaster.
4. Similarly, 'sci-fi' fans in general must be totally ignored. It is
not for them.
5. There should be no mention of any previous Dr Who or assistant. This episode - the one people are watching right now - is what's important.
6. Doctor Who must be fun, but there must be no breaking of the fourth
wall or self-referential humour.
7. The tone of the stories should be as varied as possible. The variety should clash, each new situation should be fresh and different.
8. A story should never begin in media res. The stepping out from the
Tardis and exploring and finding out is a major part of the thing. That should never feel ordinary, casual or routine.
9. Nobody should ever be revived from the dead. There must be no
parallel universes or alternative realities, or time trickery.
Everything counts - and the normal laws of drama, cause and effect, life
and death, always apply.
10. There is no magic. Dr Who is a scientist, and the fictional world is solid and explicable in scientific terms, even if far in advance of ours.
11. As in the 1960s, it should be the case that Dr Who cannot steer the Tardis. At all. Ever. This immediately solves nearly all of a writer's narrative problems, and raises the stakes of every story and situation.
Being able to pop home or zoom about where you fancy on a whim makes the scenario mundane.
12. Stories about Dr Who himself, the Tardis and the Time Lords, the
series mythos etc, and overarching narratives in general, are boring and
a turn-off. Every story must be excellent in itself.
13. Dr Who is a character part, not an acting part (Patrick Troughton,
Tom Baker and Matt Smith knew this in their souls.) He is loveable and elusive and naughty and fascinating, and most of all fun. Any attempt to
make him brooding and dark - or worse, maudlin - is embarrassing and adolescent, except in the tiniest, rarest doses.
14. Dr Who does not have a moral mission and he does not make plans. He
is an improviser. His motivation comes from just being a kind and
civilised man who helps out because he feels that ... well, anybody would help out, wouldn't they?
15. He is never funky, with-it or down wiv da kids. Equally, he is not a stuffy fossil. He is beyond either of those things, as he is beyond sex, money, religion, politics and most other things that children are not interested in. He never ever peacocks or grandstands and is never pious
or self-pitying.
16. There should be one (female) assistant only, and she should always
be someone the audience can identify with i.e. someone from planet
Earth. The assistant's purpose is to keep everyone's feet on the ground.
She should not be 'special' or significant in herself, as every kid
watching needs to feel they could be the assistant. She should usually
be the only person under thirty around. Children are absolutely forbidden.
17. Spectacle is nice but totally unnecessary. Invention, fun, scares,
and loveable main actors are worth far more.
18. Monster concepts and designs are, however, incredibly important.
This is where money should be spent. Children don't care about pretty
views or beautiful direction. The only production value they do care
about is being convincingly spooked. Everything else must bow to that. A spooky tunnel is worth a hundred CGI panoramas.
19. Attempts at profundity and social commentary should be resisted as strongly as attempts at sentimentality.
20. The big emotion should be joy: the joy of adventure, excitement,
frights and laughs. The viewer must feel elated. Doctor Who should be a delicious helping of trifle that anybody and everybody can enjoy.
Written by
Gareth Roberts
Gareth Roberts is a TV scriptwriter and novelist who has worked on
Doctor Who and Coronation Street. He is the author of The Age of Stupid substack.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for." --William Shatner
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
The True Doctor wrote:
I mostly agree with Gareth Roberts suggestions, especially 10, 12, 13,
14, 15, 16, 19, and 20.
Suggestion 3 needs to be expanded because Doctor Who although it should
never ever be written for teenagers, it must always be written to appeal
to both children and adults simultaneously at different levels. This is
why the Tom Baker era is still re-watchable whereas the modern era is not. >>
I don't agree with 4. The main reason I got into Doctor Who was because
it was science-fiction and that it was based on science-fiction themes
such as using logic and reason to solve problems, adventure, and the
hero's journey, as well as other elements of speculative fiction such as
horror. Because suggestion 10 rules out magic what Doctor Who is not is
fantasy. It can contain fantastical elements but everything must always
ultimately be explained by plausible science and basic scientific
principles can never be ignored.
Suggestion 2 needs to be made more precise. "Doctor Who is a British
show aimed squarely at a British audience which is overwhelmingly
heterosexual, and being speculative fiction caters primarily for a male
audience. Therefore, the Doctor must always be portrayed as a white,
heterosexual, British male character to represent the majority of the
audience. Everybody in Britain and everybody else prefers it that way."
<<
Gareth Roberts
Twenty ways to fix Doctor Who
https://spectator.com/article/twenty-ways-to-fix-doctor-who/
16 June 2026, 1:17am
Jodie Whittaker was the thirteenth and first female lead actor to play
the Doctor in Doctor Who (Alamy)
The BBC has binned its planned Doctor Who Christmas special and put the
show 'out to tender'. This is a face-saving TV industry term for saying
you've kicked an ailing show into the longest of grass, but don't want
to enrage its most rabid fans. Good luck with that, chaps. Essentially
it translates as 'Somebody please, please take this nightmare off our
hands'. It's like one of those Facebook ads you see for a dog that needs
rehousing because it barks all night, gnaws on toddlers, and has no
control of its bowels, but is a total sweetie, honestly.
I'd put Doctor Who on ice for at least a decade
If by some bizarre quirk of circumstance I found myself the unwilling
owner of the tender, I'd put Doctor Who on ice for at least a decade.
Much has been written in the past few days about what happened to poor
old Doctor Who, how the thing was revived in glory and then retoxified
in shame. As a former writer on Doctor Who, I was actually in the room
when some of the mistakes were made. I offer the following suggestions -
in a reflective but constructive spirit - for anybody barmy enough to
take the thing on. (And yes, I broke many of these 'rules' myself, but I
know better now.)
1. The character is called Dr Who, but nobody in the fiction knows that,
probably not even him, so within it he's referred to as 'the Doctor'.
But his name is Dr Who. The public know this, and the public is always
right. Correcting the public on this obvious point - and billing him as
'The Doctor' on the end credits - makes a production look quite mad.
Similarly, those who travel with Dr Who are his friends, or his
assistants. Not 'companions', which is positively Victorian and
cringe-inducing.
2. Doctor Who is a British show aimed squarely at a British audience.
Everybody else prefers it that way.
3. This is always, primarily, a children's show for ages five to 12.
Everybody else is there on sufferance. Adults may well enjoy the
innovation. playfulness and whimsy, but teenagers must never be appealed
to. That way lies disaster.
4. Similarly, 'sci-fi' fans in general must be totally ignored. It is
not for them.
5. There should be no mention of any previous Dr Who or assistant. This
episode - the one people are watching right now - is what's important.
6. Doctor Who must be fun, but there must be no breaking of the fourth
wall or self-referential humour.
7. The tone of the stories should be as varied as possible. The variety
should clash, each new situation should be fresh and different.
8. A story should never begin in media res. The stepping out from the
Tardis and exploring and finding out is a major part of the thing. That
should never feel ordinary, casual or routine.
9. Nobody should ever be revived from the dead. There must be no
parallel universes or alternative realities, or time trickery.
Everything counts - and the normal laws of drama, cause and effect, life
and death, always apply.
10. There is no magic. Dr Who is a scientist, and the fictional world is
solid and explicable in scientific terms, even if far in advance of ours.
11. As in the 1960s, it should be the case that Dr Who cannot steer the
Tardis. At all. Ever. This immediately solves nearly all of a writer's
narrative problems, and raises the stakes of every story and situation.
Being able to pop home or zoom about where you fancy on a whim makes the
scenario mundane.
12. Stories about Dr Who himself, the Tardis and the Time Lords, the
series mythos etc, and overarching narratives in general, are boring and
a turn-off. Every story must be excellent in itself.
13. Dr Who is a character part, not an acting part (Patrick Troughton,
Tom Baker and Matt Smith knew this in their souls.) He is loveable and
elusive and naughty and fascinating, and most of all fun. Any attempt to
make him brooding and dark - or worse, maudlin - is embarrassing and
adolescent, except in the tiniest, rarest doses.
14. Dr Who does not have a moral mission and he does not make plans. He
is an improviser. His motivation comes from just being a kind and
civilised man who helps out because he feels that ... well, anybody would
help out, wouldn't they?
15. He is never funky, with-it or down wiv da kids. Equally, he is not a
stuffy fossil. He is beyond either of those things, as he is beyond sex,
money, religion, politics and most other things that children are not
interested in. He never ever peacocks or grandstands and is never pious
or self-pitying.
16. There should be one (female) assistant only, and she should always
be someone the audience can identify with i.e. someone from planet
Earth. The assistant's purpose is to keep everyone's feet on the ground.
She should not be 'special' or significant in herself, as every kid
watching needs to feel they could be the assistant. She should usually
be the only person under thirty around. Children are absolutely forbidden. >>
17. Spectacle is nice but totally unnecessary. Invention, fun, scares,
and loveable main actors are worth far more.
18. Monster concepts and designs are, however, incredibly important.
This is where money should be spent. Children don't care about pretty
views or beautiful direction. The only production value they do care
about is being convincingly spooked. Everything else must bow to that. A
spooky tunnel is worth a hundred CGI panoramas.
19. Attempts at profundity and social commentary should be resisted as
strongly as attempts at sentimentality.
20. The big emotion should be joy: the joy of adventure, excitement,
frights and laughs. The viewer must feel elated. Doctor Who should be a
delicious helping of trifle that anybody and everybody can enjoy.
Written by
Gareth Roberts
Gareth Roberts is a TV scriptwriter and novelist who has worked on
Doctor Who and Coronation Street. He is the author of The Age of Stupid
substack.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." --William Shatner
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era would be a
splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost everyone I know.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia began
airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the local, small
science fiction audience in this area wS captivated for the short while
the episodes aired here, 1978 to around early 1980.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it was
solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics began representing
the British Dr. Who comic books, which featured the Doctor drawn in the
Tom Baker style.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star Trek is going
with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
This response appears in the discussion at: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=706275752#706275752--
--
Via JLA Forums web gateway for rec.arts.drwho: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=668
Will-Dockery wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their
"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.)
style...
In article <pFGdnWcgN5m7hdf3nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>,
Will-Dockery <will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid> wrote:
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star Trek is going >with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
Whatever get rids of the Timeless Child.
Verily, in article <112dd4o$2a9u$28@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did >doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <pFGdnWcgN5m7hdf3nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>,
Will-Dockery <will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid> wrote:
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star Trek is going
with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
Whatever get rids of the Timeless Child.
If we stop talking about it, it'll go away all by itself. The only power
it has is the power we give it.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
In article <xn0prwt7u6kmeb001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their
"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.)
style...
What to retcon the timeless child.
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dd9t$2a9u$33 >@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <xn0prwt7u6kmeb001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their
"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.)
style...
Whatever to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent as Little Willie Douchebag.
----
"The fact that it doesn't apply to the poem is of little consequence to
you, because your poems don't have a literary basis, because you're >functionally illiterate and haven't got a clue as to what a poem is." - >Little Willie Douchebag gets another asskicking from Pendragon
Verily, in article <112dd4o$2a9u$28@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Whatever get rids of the Timeless Child.
If we stop talking about it, it'll go away all by itself.
The only power it has is the power we give it.
In article <XnsB4804B81268CDPantyheadPoorHouse@157.180.91.226>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dd9t$2a9u$33 >>@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <xn0prwt7u6kmeb001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their
"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.)
style...
Whatever to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent as Little Willie Douchebag.
And you are brainded due to rabies.
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dfa2$1b8c$2 @gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <XnsB4804B81268CDPantyheadPoorHouse@157.180.91.226>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dd9t$2a9u$33
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
Whatever to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent as Little Willie Douchebag.
And you are brainded due to rabies.
WTF is "BRAINDED? Are you that drunk this early, dipshit? I suppore it's
a good thing that Little Willie Douchebag is a fellow drug abuser!
You should have lots to incoherently mumble about.
On 5/07/2026 9:39 pm, Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dfa2$1b8c$2
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <XnsB4804B81268CDPantyheadPoorHouse@157.180.91.226>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dd9t$2a9u$33
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
<Snip>
Whatever to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent as Little Willie Douchebag.
And you are brainded due to rabies.
WTF is "BRAINDED? Are you that drunk this early, dipshit? I suppore
it's a good thing that Little Willie Douchebag is a fellow drug
abuser!
Maybe Binky started early because of the Football!! And started on the
Turps early, too.
You should have lots to incoherently mumble about.
Verily, in article <112dd4o$2a9u$28@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <pFGdnWcgN5m7hdf3nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>,
Will-Dockery <will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid> wrote:
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star Trek is going >>> with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
Whatever get rids of the Timeless Child.
If we stop talking about it, it'll go away all by itself. The only power
it has is the power we give it.
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <112dd4o$2a9u$28@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Whatever get rids of the Timeless Child.
If we stop talking about it, it'll go away all by itself.
The only power it has is the power we give it.
^^^^
THIS!
The people really against it are the ones that keep on
mentioning it.
Every single day!
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dfa2$1b8c$2 >@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <XnsB4804B81268CDPantyheadPoorHouse@157.180.91.226>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dd9t$2a9u$33 >>>@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <xn0prwt7u6kmeb001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their >>>>>"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.) >>>>>style...
Whatever to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent as Little Willie Douchebag.
And you are brainded due to rabies.
WTF is "BRAINDED? Are you that drunk this early, dip? I suppore it's
a good thing that Little Willie Douchebag is a fellow drug abuser!
You should have lots to incoherently mumble about.
----
"The fact that it doesn't apply to the poem is of little consequence to
you, because your poems don't have a literary basis, because you're >functionally illiterate and haven't got a clue as to what a poem is." - >Little Willie Douchebag gets another asskicking from Pendragon
On 5/07/2026 9:39 pm, Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:--
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dfa2$1b8c$2
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <XnsB4804B81268CDPantyheadPoorHouse@157.180.91.226>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dd9t$2a9u$33
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
<Snip>
Whatever to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent as Little Willie Douchebag.
And you are brainded due to rabies.
WTF is "BRAINDED? Are you that drunk this early, dipshit? I suppore it's
a good thing that Little Willie Douchebag is a fellow drug abuser!
Maybe Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual >molestation)started early because of the Football!! And started on the
Turps early, too.
--
You should have lots to incoherently mumble about.
Daniel70
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in >news:112djbg$12frj$1@dont-email.me:
On 5/07/2026 9:39 pm, Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dfa2$1b8c$2
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <XnsB4804B81268CDPantyheadPoorHouse@157.180.91.226>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dd9t$2a9u$33
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
<Snip>
Whatever to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent as Little Willie Douchebag.
And you are brainded due to rabies.
WTF is "BRAINDED? Are you that drunk this early, dipshit? I suppore
it's a good thing that Little Willie Douchebag is a fellow drug
abuser!
Maybe Binky started early because of the Football!! And started on the
Turps early, too.
So why are the kooks in the Dr. who group so fucking incoherent?
You should have lots to incoherently mumble about.
Well, they are entertainment and free...
--
"The fact that it doesn't apply to the poem is of little consequence to
you, because your poems don't have a literary basis, because you're >functionally illiterate and haven't got a clue as to what a poem is." - >Little Willie Douchebag gets another asskicking from Pendragon
On 05/07/2026 12:16, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <112dd4o$2a9u$28@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <pFGdnWcgN5m7hdf3nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>,
Will-Dockery <will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid> wrote:
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star Trek is going >>>> with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
Whatever get rids of the Timeless Child.
If we stop talking about it, it'll go away all by itself. The only power
it has is the power we give it.
No it wont.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa> wrote:
Verily, in article <112dd4o>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <pFGdnWcgN5m7hdf3nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d>,
Will-Dockery <will> wrote:
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star Trek is going
with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
Whatever get rids of the Timeless Child.
If we stop talking about it, it'll go away all by itself. The only power
it has is the power we give it.
retconning it will make it go away.
--
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; 31 years in the ISP business!
The Doctor wrote:AntiChrist rising!
In article <MPG>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa> wrote:
Verily, in article <112dd4o>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <pFGdnWcgN5m7hdf3nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d>,
Will-Dockery <will> wrote:
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star Trek is going >>> with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
Whatever get rids of the Timeless Child.
If we stop talking about it, it'll go away all by itself. The only power >>> it has is the power we give it.
retconning it will make it go away.
--
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; 31 years in the ISP business!
That's true, retconning can change anything, but not always for the better.
This response appears in the discussion at: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=706275752#706275752--
--
Via JLA Forums web gateway for rec.arts.drwho: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=668
On 05/07/2026 12:16, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <112dd4o$2a9u$28@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Whatever get rids of the Timeless Child.
If we stop talking about it, it'll go away all by itself.
The only power it has is the power we give it.
No it wont.
The Doctor wrote:
retconning it will make it go away.
That's true, retconning can change anything, but not always
for the better.
Will-Dockery wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
retconning it will make it go away.
That's true, retconning can change anything, but not always
for the better.
Yeah, just imagine... a new "Doctor Who" showrunner comes in and
retcons the things that the vocal minority want retconned... and
then we end up with something a whole lot worse!!!
I say leave well alone and move on...
In article <112e3u3$18jr0$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 05/07/2026 12:16, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <112dd4o$2a9u$28@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <pFGdnWcgN5m7hdf3nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>,
Will-Dockery <will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid> wrote:
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star Trek is going >>>>> with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
Whatever get rids of the Timeless Child.
If we stop talking about it, it'll go away all by itself. The only power >>> it has is the power we give it.
No it wont.
Hear! Hear! When is Ribos Operation up?
The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/07/2026 12:16, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <112dd4o$2a9u$28@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Whatever get rids of the Timeless Child.
If we stop talking about it, it'll go away all by itself.
The only power it has is the power we give it.
No it wont.
If you and Dave stopped talking about it on RADW it would go
away from here at least!
That would be a start...
In article <XnsB4804DF557D09PantyheadPoorHouse@157.180.91.226>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dfa2$1b8c$2 >@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <XnsB4804B81268CDPantyheadPoorHouse@157.180.91.226>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote: >>>doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dd9t$2a9u$33 >>>@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <xn0prwt7u6kmeb001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their >>>>>"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.) >>>>>style...
Whatever to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent as Little Willie Douchebag.
And you are brainded due to rabies.
WTF is "BRAINDED?
incoherently
No brains in Cujo.
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
In article <XnsB4804DF557D09PantyheadPoorHouse@157.180.91.226>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dfa2$1b8c$2
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <XnsB4804B81268CDPantyheadPoorHouse@157.180.91.226>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dd9t$2a9u$33
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <xn0prwt7u6kmeb001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their
"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.)
style...
Whatever to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent as Little Willie Douchebag.
And you are brainded due to rabies.
WTF is "BRAINDED?
incoherently
No brains in Cujo.
Yes, Cujo aka Kevin Fries is nothing but a puffed up troll.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/07/2026 12:16, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <112dd4o$2a9u$28@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Whatever get rids of the Timeless Child.
If we stop talking about it, it'll go away all by itself.
The only power it has is the power we give it.
No it wont.
If you and Dave stopped talking about it on RADW it would go
away from here at least!
That would be a start...
Will-Dockery wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
retconning it will make it go away.
That's true, retconning can change anything, but not always
for the better.
Yeah, just imagine... a new "Doctor Who" showrunner comes in and
retcons the things that the vocal minority want retconned... and
then we end up with something a whole lot worse!!!
I say leave well alone and move on...
On 05/07/2026 20:27, Blueshirt wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
retconning it will make it go away.
That's true, retconning can change anything, but not always
for the better.
Yeah, just imagine... a new "Doctor Who" showrunner comes in and
retcons the things that the vocal minority want retconned... and
then we end up with something a whole lot worse!!!
I say leave well alone and move on...
The MAJORITY want the Timeless Child monster completely erased from
Doctor Who along with everything from Whittaker onwards, otherwise any >revival will never be Doctor Who.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 05/07/2026 20:02, The Doctor wrote:
In article <112e3u3$18jr0$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 05/07/2026 12:16, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <112dd4o$2a9u$28@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <pFGdnWcgN5m7hdf3nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>,
Will-Dockery <will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid> wrote:
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star Trek is going >>>>>> with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
Whatever get rids of the Timeless Child.
If we stop talking about it, it'll go away all by itself. The only power >>>> it has is the power we give it.
No it wont.
Hear! Hear! When is Ribos Operation up?
After the World Cup.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 05/07/2026 20:24, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/07/2026 12:16, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <112dd4o$2a9u$28@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Whatever get rids of the Timeless Child.
If we stop talking about it, it'll go away all by itself.
The only power it has is the power we give it.
No it wont.
If you and Dave stopped talking about it on RADW it would go
away from here at least!
That would be a start...
Staying silent about it is never going to fix any problem at all.
The Timeless Child monster must be completely erased from Doctor Who,
and then all talking about it will end.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
In article <XnsB4804DF557D09PantyheadPoorHouse@157.180.91.226>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dfa2$1b8c$2
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <XnsB4804B81268CDPantyheadPoorHouse@157.180.91.226>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dd9t$2a9u$33
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <xn0prwt7u6kmeb001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their
"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.)
style...
Whatever to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent as Little Willie Douchebag.
And you are brainded due to rabies.
WTF is "BRAINDED?
incoherently
No brains in Cujo.
Yes, Cujo aka Kevin Fries is nothing but a puffed up troll.
----
Poetry and songs of Will Dockery:
https://www.reverbnation.com/willdockery
Will Dockery <user3274@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote in news:1783295841- >3274@newsgrouper.org:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
In article <XnsB4804DF557D09PantyheadPoorHouse@157.180.91.226>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dfa2$1b8c$2
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <XnsB4804B81268CDPantyheadPoorHouse@157.180.91.226>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dd9t$2a9u$33
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <xn0prwt7u6kmeb001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their
"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.)
style...
Whatever to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent as Little Willie Douchebag.
And you are brainded due to rabies.
WTF is "BRAINDED?
incoherently
No brains in Cujo.
Yes, Cujo aka Kevin Fries is nothing but a puffed up troll.
Brave words from a cowardly snipper? It is to laugh!
--
"The fact that it doesn't apply to the poem is of little consequence to
you, because your poems don't have a literary basis, because you're >functionally illiterate and haven't got a clue as to what a poem is." - >Little Willie Douchebag gets another asskicking from Pendragon
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <112dd4o>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <pFGdnWcgN5m7hdf3nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d>,
Will-Dockery <will> wrote:
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star Trek is going
with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
Whatever get rids of the Timeless Child.
If we stop talking about it, it'll go away all by itself. The only power
it has is the power we give it.
--
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <110sh1a>, did
YourName@YourISP.com deliver unto us this message:
1. The character is called Dr Who, but nobody in the fiction knows
that, probably not even him, so within it he?s referred to as ?the
Doctor?. But his name is Dr Who. The public know this, and the public
is always right. Correcting the public on this obvious point ? and
billing him as ?The Doctor? on the end credits ? makes a production
look quite mad. Similarly, those who travel with Dr Who are his
friends, or his assistants. Not ?companions?, which is positively
Victorian and cringe-inducing.
WRONG! The show's title is "Doctor Who" and the character's name has
always been just "The Doctor". There has been a couple of times over
the years where the character's real Gallifreyian name has been
suggested (e.g. "Theta Sigma"), but they are not fully confirmed.
That's officially a school nickname based on his assigned seat, isn't
it?
It's almost as if his classmates didn't know his name either... I never thought of that before.
3. This is always, primarily, a children?s show for ages five to 12.
Everybody else is there on sufferance. Adults may well enjoy the
innovation. playfulness and whimsy, but teenagers must never be
appealed to. That way lies disaster.
Wrong! The original show was meant to be eductaional and aimed at kids
aged about 8 to 14. More recently idiots like Russell T Davies have
tried to increase that to ages 18 to 35, mainly as a money grab, which
is one of the many problems that have caused the show's downfall and
likely demise.
It's a family show, dang it. It has layers for kids and adults. There
are adventures kids can follow, themes and messages adults can ponder,
and silly characters the littlest ones can laugh at. In its heyday, it
was for everyone.
--
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/07/2026 12:16, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <112dd4o>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <pFGdnWcgN5m7hdf3nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d>,
Will-Dockery <will> wrote:
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star Trek is going
with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
Whatever get rids of the Timeless Child.
If we stop talking about it, it'll go away all by itself. The only power
it has is the power we give it.
No it wont.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for." --William Shatner
The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/07/2026 20:24, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/07/2026 12:16, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <112dd4o>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Whatever get rids of the Timeless Child.
If we stop talking about it, it'll go away all by itself.
The only power it has is the power we give it.
No it wont.
If you and Dave stopped talking about it on RADW it would go
away from here at least!
That would be a start...
Staying silent about it is never going to fix any problem at all.
The Timeless Child monster must be completely erased from Doctor Who,
and then all talking about it will end.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for." --William Shatner
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in news:1783295841-
3274@newsgrouper.org:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
In article <XnsB4804DF557D09PantyheadPoorHouse>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dfa2$1b8c$2
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <XnsB4804B81268CDPantyheadPoorHouse>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dd9t$2a9u$33
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <xn0prwt7u6kmeb001>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their
"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.)
style...
Whatever to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent
[Cujo's reading comprehension problems noted.]
And you are brainded due to rabies.
WTF is "BRAINDED?
incoherently
No brains in Cujo.
Yes, Cujo aka Kevin Fries is nothing but a puffed up troll.
Brave words
The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/07/2026 20:02, The Doctor wrote:
In article <112e3u3>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon> wrote:
On 05/07/2026 12:16, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <112dd4o>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <pFGdnWcgN5m7hdf3nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d>,
Will-Dockery <will> wrote:
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star Trek is going
with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
Whatever get rids of the Timeless Child.
If we stop talking about it, it'll go away all by itself. The only power
it has is the power we give it.
No it wont.
Hear! Hear! When is Ribos Operation up?
After the World Cup.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for." --William Shatner
The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/07/2026 20:27, Blueshirt wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
retconning it will make it go away.
That's true, retconning can change anything, but not always
for the better.
Yeah, just imagine... a new "Doctor Who" showrunner comes in and
retcons the things that the vocal minority want retconned... and
then we end up with something a whole lot worse!!!
I say leave well alone and move on...
The MAJORITY want the Timeless Child monster completely erased from
Doctor Who along with everything from Whittaker onwards, otherwise any revival will never be Doctor Who.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for." --William Shatner
On 05/07/2026 20:24, Blueshirt wrote:
If you and Dave stopped talking about it on RADW it
would go away from here at least!
That would be a start...
Staying silent about it is never going to fix any problem
at all.
The Timeless Child monster must be completely erased from
Doctor Who, and then all talking about it will end.
On 05/07/2026 20:02, The Doctor wrote:
When is Ribos Operation up?
After the World Cup.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/07/2026 20:24, Blueshirt wrote:
If you and Dave stopped talking about it on RADW it
would go away from here at least!
That would be a start...
Staying silent about it is never going to fix any problem
at all.
Where has mentioning it here every day for the last few years
got you?
Nowhere! As nothing has changed.
The Timeless Child monster must be completely erased from
Doctor Who, and then all talking about it will end.
It won't though. As you'd find something else to moan about then!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/07/2026 20:24, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/07/2026 12:16, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <112dd4o>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Whatever get rids of the Timeless Child.
If we stop talking about it, it'll go away all by itself.
The only power it has is the power we give it.
No it wont.
If you and Dave stopped talking about it on RADW it would go
away from here at least!
That would be a start...
Staying silent about it is never going to fix any problem at all.
The Timeless Child monster must be completely erased from Doctor Who,
and then all talking about it will end.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." --William Shatner
https://youtu.be/ziCQ_Odhmmw?is=6YbHu4ZSSGPkSNLw
It seems to now be a major part of the mythos now, though.
No it isn't. It no more part of Doctor Who than The Curse of Fatal
Death. It's non-canonical fan fiction.
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <112dd4o>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <pFGdnWcgN5m7hdf3nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d>,
Will-Dockery <will> wrote:
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star Trek is going >>> with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
Whatever get rids of the Timeless Child.
If we stop talking about it, it'll go away all by itself. The only power
it has is the power we give it.
--
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
Is "Timeless Child" a newsgoup troll I don't know about?
If so, thanks for the heads up.
😏
This response appears in the discussion at: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=706275752#706275752--
--
Via JLA Forums web gateway for rec.arts.drwho: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=668
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <110sh1a>, did
YourName@YourISP.com deliver unto us this message:
1. The character is called Dr Who, but nobody in the fiction knows
that, probably not even him, so within it he?s referred to as ?the
Doctor?. But his name is Dr Who. The public know this, and the public
is always right. Correcting the public on this obvious point ? and
billing him as ?The Doctor? on the end credits ? makes a production
look quite mad. Similarly, those who travel with Dr Who are his
friends, or his assistants. Not ?companions?, which is positively
Victorian and cringe-inducing.
WRONG! The show's title is "Doctor Who" and the character's name has
always been just "The Doctor". There has been a couple of times over
the years where the character's real Gallifreyian name has been
suggested (e.g. "Theta Sigma"), but they are not fully confirmed.
That's officially a school nickname based on his assigned seat, isn't
it?
It's almost as if his classmates didn't know his name either... I never
thought of that before.
3. This is always, primarily, a children?s show for ages five to 12.
Everybody else is there on sufferance. Adults may well enjoy the
innovation. playfulness and whimsy, but teenagers must never be
appealed to. That way lies disaster.
Wrong! The original show was meant to be eductaional and aimed at kids
aged about 8 to 14. More recently idiots like Russell T Davies have
tried to increase that to ages 18 to 35, mainly as a money grab, which
is one of the many problems that have caused the show's downfall and
likely demise.
It's a family show, dang it. It has layers for kids and adults. There
are adventures kids can follow, themes and messages adults can ponder,
and silly characters the littlest ones can laugh at. In its heyday, it
was for everyone.
--
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
And did it well.
This response appears in the discussion at: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=706275752#706275752--
--
Via JLA Forums web gateway for rec.arts.drwho: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=668
The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/07/2026 12:16, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <112dd4o>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <pFGdnWcgN5m7hdf3nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d>,
Will-Dockery <will> wrote:
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star Trek is going >>> with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
Whatever get rids of the Timeless Child.
If we stop talking about it, it'll go away all by itself. The only power >>> it has is the power we give it.
No it wont.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." --William Shatner
Okay, I didn't know so I looked up the Timelines Child:
https://youtu.be/ziCQ_Odhmmw?is=6YbHu4ZSSGPkSNLw
Apologies, I'm really still out of the loop
😏
View the attachments for this post at: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=707665101#707665101
This response appears in the discussion at: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=706275752#706275752--
--
Via JLA Forums web gateway for rec.arts.drwho: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=668
The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/07/2026 20:24, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/07/2026 12:16, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <112dd4o>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Whatever get rids of the Timeless Child.
If we stop talking about it, it'll go away all by itself.
The only power it has is the power we give it.
No it wont.
If you and Dave stopped talking about it on RADW it would go
away from here at least!
That would be a start...
Staying silent about it is never going to fix any problem at all.
The Timeless Child monster must be completely erased from Doctor Who,
and then all talking about it will end.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." --William Shatner
https://youtu.be/ziCQ_Odhmmw?is=6YbHu4ZSSGPkSNLw
It seems to now be a major part of the mythos now, though.
This response appears in the discussion at: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=706275752#706275752--
--
Via JLA Forums web gateway for rec.arts.drwho: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=668
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in news:1783295841-
3274@newsgrouper.org:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
In article <XnsB4804DF557D09PantyheadPoorHouse>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dfa2$1b8c$2
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <XnsB4804B81268CDPantyheadPoorHouse>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dd9t$2a9u$33
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <xn0prwt7u6kmeb001>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their
"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.)
style...
Whatever to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent
[Cujo's reading comprehension problems noted.]
And you are brainded due to rabies.
WTF is "BRAINDED?
incoherently
No brains in Cujo.
Yes, Cujo aka Kevin Fries is nothing but a puffed up troll.
Brave words
You're an obsessive cyberbully troll, Kevin.
Why not admit it?
😏
This response appears in the discussion at: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=706275752#706275752--
--
Via JLA Forums web gateway for rec.arts.drwho: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=668
The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/07/2026 20:02, The Doctor wrote:
In article <112e3u3>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon> wrote:
On 05/07/2026 12:16, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <112dd4o>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <pFGdnWcgN5m7hdf3nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d>,
Will-Dockery <will> wrote:
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star Trek is going >>> with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
Whatever get rids of the Timeless Child.
If we stop talking about it, it'll go away all by itself. The only power >>> it has is the power we give it.
No it wont.
Hear! Hear! When is Ribos Operation up?
After the World Cup.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." --William Shatner
I look forward to joining in on this one.
This response appears in the discussion at: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=706275752#706275752--
--
Via JLA Forums web gateway for rec.arts.drwho: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=668
The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/07/2026 20:27, Blueshirt wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
retconning it will make it go away.
That's true, retconning can change anything, but not always
for the better.
Yeah, just imagine... a new "Doctor Who" showrunner comes in and
retcons the things that the vocal minority want retconned... and
then we end up with something a whole lot worse!!!
I say leave well alone and move on...
The MAJORITY want the Timeless Child monster completely erased from
Doctor Who along with everything from Whittaker onwards, otherwise any
revival will never be Doctor Who.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." --William Shatner
Just as long as someone like JJ Abrams or James Gunn don't get involved.
The Kelvin timeline on Star Trek was pretty bad
This response appears in the discussion at: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=706275752#706275752--
--
Via JLA Forums web gateway for rec.arts.drwho: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=668
The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/07/2026 20:24, Blueshirt wrote:
If you and Dave stopped talking about it on RADW it
would go away from here at least!
That would be a start...
Staying silent about it is never going to fix any problem
at all.
Where has mentioning it here every day for the last few years
got you?
Nowhere! As nothing has changed.
The Timeless Child monster must be completely erased from
Doctor Who, and then all talking about it will end.
It won't though. As you'd find something else to moan about then!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/07/2026 20:02, The Doctor wrote:
When is Ribos Operation up?
After the World Cup.
There's some slow people around here. You said your
watch party would resume after the World Cup yet Dave
is still asking when. <shrugs>
On 06/07/2026 09:21, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/07/2026 20:24, Blueshirt wrote:
If you and Dave stopped talking about it on RADW it
would go away from here at least!
That would be a start...
Staying silent about it is never going to fix any problem
at all.
Where has mentioning it here every day for the last few years
got you?
Nowhere! As nothing has changed.
The series has been cancelled. I call that a success.
The Timeless Child monster must be completely erased from
Doctor Who, and then all talking about it will end.
It won't though. As you'd find something else to moan about then!
Were is the logic in that? If the Timeless Child monster is gone then
all talking about it will end.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 06/07/2026 05:06, Will-Dockery wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/07/2026 20:24, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/07/2026 12:16, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <112dd4o>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Whatever get rids of the Timeless Child.
If we stop talking about it, it'll go away all by itself.
The only power it has is the power we give it.
No it wont.
If you and Dave stopped talking about it on RADW it would go
away from here at least!
That would be a start...
Staying silent about it is never going to fix any problem at all.
The Timeless Child monster must be completely erased from Doctor Who,
and then all talking about it will end.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw >>>
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >>> stands for." --William Shatner
https://youtu.be/ziCQ_Odhmmw?is=6YbHu4ZSSGPkSNLw
It seems to now be a major part of the mythos now, though.
No it isn't. It no more part of Doctor Who than The Curse of Fatal
Death. It's non-canonical fan fiction.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Verily, in article <112g9hi$2098l$2@dont-email.me>, did >agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No it isn't. It no more part of Doctor Who than The Curse of Fatal
Death. It's non-canonical fan fiction.
We should be able to ignore it, then. I've never worried about the >developments in The Curse of Fatal Death.
I don't really want to have this argument again, but all the other
threads are about soccer, so I'll take it.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
On 06/07/2026 09:21, Blueshirt wrote:
Where has mentioning it here every day for the last
few years got you?
Nowhere! As nothing has changed.
The series has been cancelled. I call that a success.
The Timeless Child monster must be completely erased from
Doctor Who, and then all talking about it will end.
It won't though. As you'd find something else to moan about
then!
Were is the logic in that? If the Timeless Child monster is
gone then all talking about it will end.
On 06/07/2026 05:06, Will-Dockery wrote:
It seems to now be a major part of the mythos now,
though.
No it isn't. It no more part of Doctor Who than The Curse
of Fatal Death. It's non-canonical fan fiction.
Verily, in article <112g9hi$2098l$2@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No it isn't. It no more part of Doctor Who than The Curse
of Fatal Death. It's non-canonical fan fiction.
We should be able to ignore it, then. I've never worried about
the developments in The Curse of Fatal Death.
I don't really want to have this argument again, but all the
other threads are about soccer, so I'll take it.
In article <xn0pry4l31ho3i9003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/07/2026 20:02, The Doctor wrote:
When is Ribos Operation up?
After the World Cup.
There's some slow people around here. You said your
watch party would resume after the World Cup yet Dave
is still asking when. <shrugs>
Look. 3rd Place is 26 July, the big game 17 July.
Why not resume 15 July?
Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/07/2026 20:02, The Doctor wrote:
When is Ribos Operation up?
After the World Cup.
There's some slow people around here. You said your
watch party would resume after the World Cup yet Dave
is still asking when. <shrugs>
In article <xn0pry4l31ho3i9003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/07/2026 20:02, The Doctor wrote:
When is Ribos Operation up?
After the World Cup.
There's some slow people around here. You said your
watch party would resume after the World Cup yet Dave
is still asking when. <shrugs>
Look. 3rd Place is 26 July, the big game 17 July.
Why not resume 15 July?
Verily, in article <112g9hi$2098l$2@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No it isn't. It no more part of Doctor Who than The Curse of Fatal
Death. It's non-canonical fan fiction.
We should be able to ignore it, then. I've never worried about the developments in The Curse of Fatal Death.
I don't really want to have this argument again, but all the other
threads are about soccer, so I'll take it.
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <112g9hi$2098l$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No it isn't. It no more part of Doctor Who than The Curse
of Fatal Death. It's non-canonical fan fiction.
We should be able to ignore it, then. I've never worried about
the developments in The Curse of Fatal Death.
They are not the same thing. The events in The Curse of Fatal
Death are not part of "Doctor Who" lore the way the 13th Doctor
and the 'Timeless Child' storyline are.
Agamemnon knows this, but he likes to shift the argument around
to suit his agenda.
I don't really want to have this argument again, but all the
other threads are about soccer, so I'll take it.
I'm cheering on Belgium against the USA tonight! (Although I'll
be in bed when it starts.)
Put on a "Doctor Who DVD for yourself... it'll be more--
entertaining!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 06/07/2026 05:06, Will-Dockery wrote:
It seems to now be a major part of the mythos now,
though.
No it isn't. It no more part of Doctor Who than The Curse
of Fatal Death. It's non-canonical fan fiction.
That's only wishful thinking.
As it hasn't been unwritten or retconned it's still a part of
the show's lore... and it can't be changed whilst the show is
off the air!!!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 06/07/2026 09:21, Blueshirt wrote:
Where has mentioning it here every day for the last
few years got you?
Nowhere! As nothing has changed.
The series has been cancelled. I call that a success.
Well... if no "Doctor Who" at all is considered a success
to a Doctor Who "fan", then yeah, it is! BUT, the Timeless
Child arc is still part of its lore.
It hasn't gone away yer know!
The Timeless Child monster must be completely erased from
Doctor Who, and then all talking about it will end.
It won't though. As you'd find something else to moan about
then!
Were is the logic in that? If the Timeless Child monster is
gone then all talking about it will end.
You might not like what replaces it!
Every series has had some lore-changing event... if the next
showrunner doesn't mess with A, they'll miss with B, or C... etc.
TV perfection doesn't exist, seeking it is a waste of your time.
You might as well go out and hunt Unicorns!
On 06/07/2026 14:40, The Doctor wrote:
Look. 3rd Place is 26 July, the big game 17
July.
You mean 16th.
On 06/07/2026 16:03, Blueshirt wrote:
I'm cheering on Belgium against the USA tonight! (Although
I'll be in bed when it starts.)
Everyone has to support Belgium after Donald Trump blackmailed
the corrupt pieces of shit running Fifa to suspend a red card
given to a USA player.
There's been no new Doctor Who since 2017 when Doctor Who
ended.
It's impossible to ignore it.
There were no incarnations of the Doctor
before Hartnell. The Doctor is not and was never a mass murdering, race
and gender swapping, genocidal monster from another dimension, nor a homosexual, nor a transgender woman or transgender man.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 06/07/2026 14:40, The Doctor wrote:
Look. 3rd Place is 26 July, the big game 17
July.
You mean 16th.
No, you both mean Sunday the 19th!
The 3rd/4th place game is the day before, Saturday 18th.
The True Doctor wrote:
There's been no new Doctor Who since 2017 when Doctor Who
ended.
So what do you want retconned then? If there was no "Doctor Who"
after 2017, why do you keep going on about things after 2017
then?
Doctor Who finished in 2017... okay, so get on with your life
then and stop moaning. There's nothing to retcon.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 06/07/2026 19:12, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
There's been no new Doctor Who since 2017 when Doctor Who
ended.
So what do you want retconned then? If there was no "Doctor Who"
after 2017, why do you keep going on about things after 2017
then?
Doctor Who finished in 2017... okay, so get on with your life
then and stop moaning. There's nothing to retcon.
There is a pile of degenerate fan fiction which is stopping Doctor Who
from returning. Without that gone Doctor Who will never come back.
Doctor Who must continue from where it ended in The Doctor Falls with
Peter Capaldi regenerating into a white British heterosexual man.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for." --William Shatner
Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 16/06/2026 19:36, Blueshirt wrote:
Of course, Gareth Roberts is anti-woke so obviously
you'd agree with him, but that was not a serious sales
pitch to the BBC to "fix" Doctor Who. As the chances of
them following those twenty points for a future series
of Doctor Who are about zero!
Then the chances of people watching it are about zero too!
Well... at the moment there is nothing to watch! And I don't
think there will be for a few years yet. I really don't think
the BBC know what to do with "Doctor Who" or have the money
to do it even if they did!
But FWIW, I would like to see "Doctor Who" be more sci-fi based
when it does return, as for me that was the core concept behind
the show's original set-up... not fantasy stuff like singing
Goblins and fairy tale imagery like snot monsters (aka the
bogeyman)!
In article <XnsB4804B81268CDPantyheadPoorHouse@157.180.91.226>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dd9t$2a9u$33 >@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <xn0prwt7u6kmeb001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their
"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.)
style...
Whatever to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent
And you are brainded due to rabies.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 06/07/2026 19:12, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
There's been no new Doctor Who since 2017 when Doctor Who
ended.
So what do you want retconned then? If there was no "Doctor Who"
after 2017, why do you keep going on about things after 2017
then?
Doctor Who finished in 2017... okay, so get on with your life
then and stop moaning. There's nothing to retcon.
There is a pile of degenerate fan fiction which is stopping Doctor Who
from returning. Without that gone Doctor Who will never come back.
Doctor Who must continue from where it ended in The Doctor Falls with
Peter Capaldi regenerating into a white British heterosexual man.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." --William Shatner
As I've sId before, like the track Star Trek has been taking with
"Strange New Worlds" and so on, I feel that the time might be right to return to the classic, iconic Tom Baker look and style.
Bring back the hat, the scarf, and the 'fro, for me this was my first glimmering of Dr. Who and in many ways the greatest.
Will it happen? Perhaps the time is right it.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 06/07/2026 16:03, Blueshirt wrote:
I'm cheering on Belgium against the USA tonight! (Although
I'll be in bed when it starts.)
Everyone has to support Belgium after Donald Trump blackmailed
the corrupt pieces of shit running Fifa to suspend a red card
given to a USA player.
Yes. It's all as corrupt as fuck.
Go Belgium!
Verily, in article <112goga$25p0l$1@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
It's impossible to ignore it.
You think?
There were no incarnations of the Doctor
before Hartnell. The Doctor is not and was never a mass murdering, race
and gender swapping, genocidal monster from another dimension, nor a
homosexual, nor a transgender woman or transgender man.
Yes, I agree.
See? We both ignored it. :-)
The True Doctor wrote:
On 06/07/2026 09:21, Blueshirt wrote:
Where has mentioning it here every day for the last
few years got you?
Nowhere! As nothing has changed.
The series has been cancelled. I call that a success.
Well... if no "Doctor Who" at all is considered a success
to a Doctor Who "fan", then yeah, it is! BUT, the Timeless
Child arc is still part of its lore.
It hasn't gone away yer know!
The Timeless Child monster must be completely erased from
Doctor Who, and then all talking about it will end.
It won't though. As you'd find something else to moan about
then!
Were is the logic in that? If the Timeless Child monster is
gone then all talking about it will end.
You might not like what replaces it!
Every series has had some lore-changing event... if the next
showrunner doesn't mess with A, they'll miss with B, or C... etc.
TV perfection doesn't exist, seeking it is a waste of your time.
You might as well go out and hunt Unicorns!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 06/07/2026 05:06, Will-Dockery wrote:
It seems to now be a major part of the mythos now,
though.
No it isn't. It no more part of Doctor Who than The Curse
of Fatal Death. It's non-canonical fan fiction.
That's only wishful thinking.
As it hasn't been unwritten or retconned it's still a part of
the show's lore... and it can't be changed whilst the show is
off the air!!!
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <112g9hi$2098l$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No it isn't. It no more part of Doctor Who than The Curse
of Fatal Death. It's non-canonical fan fiction.
We should be able to ignore it, then. I've never worried about
the developments in The Curse of Fatal Death.
They are not the same thing. The events in The Curse of Fatal
Death are not part of "Doctor Who" lore the way the 13th Doctor
and the 'Timeless Child' storyline are.
Agamemnon knows this, but he likes to shift the argument around
to suit his agenda.
I don't really want to have this argument again, but all the
other threads are about soccer, so I'll take it.
I'm cheering on Belgium against the USA tonight! (Although I'll
be in bed when it starts.)
Put on a "Doctor Who DVD for yourself... it'll be more
entertaining!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pry4l31ho3i9003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/07/2026 20:02, The Doctor wrote:
When is Ribos Operation up?
After the World Cup.
There's some slow people around here. You said your
watch party would resume after the World Cup yet Dave
is still asking when. <shrugs>
Look. 3rd Place is 26 July, the big game 17 July.
WRONG!
The World Cup Final is Sunday 19th July.
Why not resume 15 July?
Maybe because that isn't "after" the World Cup?
Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/07/2026 20:02, The Doctor wrote:
When is Ribos Operation up?
After the World Cup.
There's some slow people around here. You said your
watch party would resume after the World Cup yet Dave
is still asking when. <shrugs>
Like me, Dave might not follow sports.
This response appears in the discussion at: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=706275752#706275752--
--
Via JLA Forums web gateway for rec.arts.drwho: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=668
On 06/07/2026 14:40, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pry4l31ho3i9003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/07/2026 20:02, The Doctor wrote:
When is Ribos Operation up?
After the World Cup.
There's some slow people around here. You said your
watch party would resume after the World Cup yet Dave
is still asking when. <shrugs>
Look. 3rd Place is 26 July, the big game 17 July.
You mean 16th.
Why not resume 15 July?
I don't want to be writing and answering reviews during the football.
It's already bad enough not getting any proper sleep because of it.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 06/07/2026 14:21, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <112g9hi$2098l$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No it isn't. It no more part of Doctor Who than The Curse of Fatal
Death. It's non-canonical fan fiction.
We should be able to ignore it, then. I've never worried about the
developments in The Curse of Fatal Death.
It's impossible to ignore it. There were no incarnations of the Doctor >before Hartnell. The Doctor is not and was never a mass murdering, race
and gender swapping, genocidal monster from another dimension, nor a >homosexual, nor a transgender woman or transgender man.
I don't really want to have this argument again, but all the other
threads are about soccer, so I'll take it.
Degenerate fan fiction can never be considered to be canon. Doctor Who
ended in 2017. It will never return again unless the Timeless Child
monster is retconed.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 06/07/2026 16:03, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <112g9hi$2098l$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
No it isn't. It no more part of Doctor Who than The Curse
of Fatal Death. It's non-canonical fan fiction.
We should be able to ignore it, then. I've never worried about
the developments in The Curse of Fatal Death.
They are not the same thing. The events in The Curse of Fatal
Death are not part of "Doctor Who" lore the way the 13th Doctor
and the 'Timeless Child' storyline are.
None of them are part of Doctor Who lore.
Agamemnon knows this, but he likes to shift the argument around
to suit his agenda.
Doctor Who ended in 2017. The Timeless Child monster is not the
character of the Doctor. It's the character of Doomsday.
I don't really want to have this argument again, but all the
other threads are about soccer, so I'll take it.
I'm cheering on Belgium against the USA tonight! (Although I'll
be in bed when it starts.)
Everyone has to support Belgium after Donald Trump blackmailed the
corrupt pieces of s*it running Fifa to suspend a red card given to a USA >player.
Put on a "Doctor Who DVD for yourself... it'll be more
entertaining!
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 06/07/2026 16:03, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 06/07/2026 05:06, Will-Dockery wrote:
It seems to now be a major part of the mythos now,
though.
No it isn't. It no more part of Doctor Who than The Curse
of Fatal Death. It's non-canonical fan fiction.
That's only wishful thinking.
As it hasn't been unwritten or retconned it's still a part of
the show's lore... and it can't be changed whilst the show is
off the air!!!
Doctor Who ended in 2017. Nothing after The Doctor Falls is canon.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 06/07/2026 16:03, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 06/07/2026 09:21, Blueshirt wrote:
Where has mentioning it here every day for the last
few years got you?
Nowhere! As nothing has changed.
The series has been cancelled. I call that a success.
Well... if no "Doctor Who" at all is considered a success
to a Doctor Who "fan", then yeah, it is! BUT, the Timeless
Child arc is still part of its lore.
It hasn't gone away yer know!
There's been no new Doctor Who since 2017 when Doctor Who ended.
The Timeless Child monster must be completely erased from
Doctor Who, and then all talking about it will end.
It won't though. As you'd find something else to moan about
then!
Were is the logic in that? If the Timeless Child monster is
gone then all talking about it will end.
You might not like what replaces it!
Every series has had some lore-changing event... if the next
showrunner doesn't mess with A, they'll miss with B, or C... etc.
Wrong. Not one genuine series changed the Doctor's origin story and
turned him into a completely different character altogether.
TV perfection doesn't exist, seeking it is a waste of your time.
You might as well go out and hunt Unicorns!
The Doctor has always been a Time Lord born on the planet Galifrey who
fled in a stolen TARDIS along with his granddaughter in order to explore
the universe.
No one changed any of that until Chibnall's degenerate fan fiction and >Davies quadrupling down on it .
He is not a mass murdering, race and gender swapping, genocidal monster
from another dimension.
Davies and Chibnall completely and utterly destroyed the entire
franchise by turning it into something else that was not Doctor Who.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
The True Doctor wrote:
On 06/07/2026 14:40, The Doctor wrote:
Look. 3rd Place is 26 July, the big game 17
July.
You mean 16th.
No, you both mean Sunday the 19th!
The 3rd/4th place game is the day before, Saturday 18th.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 06/07/2026 16:03, Blueshirt wrote:
I'm cheering on Belgium against the USA tonight! (Although
I'll be in bed when it starts.)
Everyone has to support Belgium after Donald Trump blackmailed
the corrupt pieces of shit running Fifa to suspend a red card
given to a USA player.
Yes. It's all as corrupt as f*k.
Go Belgium!
The True Doctor wrote:
There's been no new Doctor Who since 2017 when Doctor Who
ended.
So what do you want retconned then? If there was no "Doctor Who"
after 2017, why do you keep going on about things after 2017
then?
Doctor Who finished in 2017... okay, so get on with your life
then and stop moaning. There's nothing to retcon.
Verily, in article <112goga$25p0l$1@dont-email.me>, did >agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
It's impossible to ignore it.
You think?
There were no incarnations of the Doctor
before Hartnell. The Doctor is not and was never a mass murdering, race
and gender swapping, genocidal monster from another dimension, nor a
homosexual, nor a transgender woman or transgender man.
Yes, I agree.
See? We both ignored it. :-)
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
Verily, in article <xn0pryk09n1urwz000@post.eweka.nl>, did >blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 06/07/2026 14:40, The Doctor wrote:
Look. 3rd Place is 26 July, the big game 17
July.
You mean 16th.
No, you both mean Sunday the 19th!
The 3rd/4th place game is the day before, Saturday 18th.
Either way, "The Ribos Operation" should be on Saturday the 25th.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
On 06/07/2026 19:12, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
There's been no new Doctor Who since 2017 when Doctor Who
ended.
So what do you want retconned then? If there was no "Doctor Who"
after 2017, why do you keep going on about things after 2017
then?
Doctor Who finished in 2017... okay, so get on with your life
then and stop moaning. There's nothing to retcon.
There is a pile of degenerate fan fiction which is stopping Doctor Who
from returning. Without that gone Doctor Who will never come back.
Doctor Who must continue from where it ended in The Doctor Falls with
Peter Capaldi regenerating into a white British heterosexual man.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
The True Doctor wrote:
On 06/07/2026 19:12, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
There's been no new Doctor Who since 2017 when Doctor Who
ended.
So what do you want retconned then? If there was no "Doctor Who"
after 2017, why do you keep going on about things after 2017
then?
Doctor Who finished in 2017... okay, so get on with your life
then and stop moaning. There's nothing to retcon.
There is a pile of degenerate fan fiction which is stopping Doctor Who
from returning. Without that gone Doctor Who will never come back.
Doctor Who must continue from where it ended in The Doctor Falls with
Peter Capaldi regenerating into a white British heterosexual man.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." --William Shatner
As I've sId before, like the track Star Trek has been taking with
"Strange New Worlds" and so on, I feel that the time might be right to
return to the classic, iconic Tom Baker look and style.
Bring back the hat, the scarf, and the 'fro, for me this was my first >glimmering of Dr. Who and in many ways the greatest.
Will it happen? Perhaps the time is right it.
This response appears in the discussion at: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=706275752#706275752--
--
Via JLA Forums web gateway for rec.arts.drwho: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=668
Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 16/06/2026 19:36, Blueshirt wrote:
Of course, Gareth Roberts is anti-woke so obviously
you'd agree with him, but that was not a serious sales
pitch to the BBC to "fix" Doctor Who. As the chances of
them following those twenty points for a future series
of Doctor Who are about zero!
Then the chances of people watching it are about zero too!
Well... at the moment there is nothing to watch! And I don't
think there will be for a few years yet. I really don't think
the BBC know what to do with "Doctor Who" or have the money
to do it even if they did!
But FWIW, I would like to see "Doctor Who" be more sci-fi based
when it does return, as for me that was the core concept behind
the show's original set-up... not fantasy stuff like singing
Goblins and fairy tale imagery like snot monsters (aka the
bogeyman)!
Definitely a lean back to harder Science Fiction elements should be the
core concept.
This response appears in the discussion at: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=706275752#706275752--
--
Via JLA Forums web gateway for rec.arts.drwho: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=668
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
In article <XnsB4804B81268CDPantyheadPoorHouse@157.180.91.226>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dd9t$2a9u$33
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <xn0prwt7u6kmeb001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their
"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.)
style...
Whatever to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent
Cujo blaming his reading comprehension problems on others again, noted.
And you are brainded due to rabies.
Probably not that far from the truth.
😏--
--
Poetry and songs of Will Dockery:
https://www.reverbnation.com/willdockery
In article <1783295841-3274@newsgrouper.org>,
Will Dockery <user3274@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
In article <XnsB4804DF557D09PantyheadPoorHouse@157.180.91.226>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dfa2$1b8c$2
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <XnsB4804B81268CDPantyheadPoorHouse@157.180.91.226>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dd9t$2a9u$33
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <xn0prwt7u6kmeb001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their
"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.)
style...
Whatever to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent
And you are brainded due to rabies.
WTF is "BRAINDED?
incoherently
No brains in Cujo.
Yes, Cujo aka Kevin Fries is nothing but a puffed up troll.
He suffers from extreme rabies.
On 07/07/2026 06:29, Will-Dockery wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 06/07/2026 19:12, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
There's been no new Doctor Who since 2017 when Doctor Who
ended.
So what do you want retconned then? If there was no "Doctor Who"
after 2017, why do you keep going on about things after 2017
then?
Doctor Who finished in 2017... okay, so get on with your life
then and stop moaning. There's nothing to retcon.
There is a pile of degenerate fan fiction which is stopping Doctor Who
from returning. Without that gone Doctor Who will never come back.
Doctor Who must continue from where it ended in The Doctor Falls with
Peter Capaldi regenerating into a white British heterosexual man.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw >>>
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >>> stands for." --William Shatner
As I've sId before, like the track Star Trek has been taking with
"Strange New Worlds" and so on, I feel that the time might be right to
return to the classic, iconic Tom Baker look and style.
Bring back the hat, the scarf, and the 'fro, for me this was my first
glimmering of Dr. Who and in many ways the greatest.
Will it happen? Perhaps the time is right it.
That can only happened as a movie with stories being written to fit in >between existing ones, like with Big Finish remakes like the 1960s
movies, but better. And still the Timeless Child monster must be totally >erased from canon in the manner of the season of Dallas that never was >before anyone will go to watch it.
The Timeless Child has destroyed the entire franchise by turning the
Doctor into a monster from another dimension, and woman, and a
homosexual in order to sexually groom children, and this sick,
disgusting, degenerate, woke ideology is being used to brainwash
children in UK schools today. Girls are literally being taught to hate
and despised boys and men because of false narratives about toxic >masculinity. They've even been made to write speeches performed in front
of parents stating that they'd rather go into a forest full of wild
animals that would rip them apart and still feel safer than being in the >company of boys or men. This is total depravity. They are also
brainwashed in Personal Development with the totally false narratives of >homophobia and transgenderism and to identify as the opposite gender and >anyone who tries to speak out against it is not allowed to speak freely, >punished, and humiliated. This is far worse than I ever imagined when I >heard about it from a friend of mine and his son who stood with him as >witness. Our schools have been taken over by fucking Nazi child molesters.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 06/07/2026 19:09, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 06/07/2026 16:03, Blueshirt wrote:
I'm cheering on Belgium against the USA tonight! (Although
I'll be in bed when it starts.)
Everyone has to support Belgium after Donald Trump blackmailed
the corrupt pieces of shit running Fifa to suspend a red card
given to a USA player.
Yes. It's all as corrupt as f&k.
Go Belgium!
Belgium thrashed them 4 - 1.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 06/07/2026 20:37, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <112goga$25p0l$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
It's impossible to ignore it.
You think?
There were no incarnations of the Doctor
before Hartnell. The Doctor is not and was never a mass murdering, race
and gender swapping, genocidal monster from another dimension, nor a
homosexual, nor a transgender woman or transgender man.
Yes, I agree.
See? We both ignored it. :-)
No we didn't. It's taken over and destroyed the entire franchise.
----
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Will Dockery wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their
"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.)
style...
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
In article <1783295841-3274@newsgrouper.org>,
Will Dockery <user3274@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
In article <XnsB4804DF557D09PantyheadPoorHouse@157.180.91.226>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dfa2$1b8c$2
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <XnsB4804B81268CDPantyheadPoorHouse@157.180.91.226>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dd9t$2a9u$33
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <xn0prwt7u6kmeb001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their
"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.)
style...
Whatever to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent
Again, CujoDeSockpuppet blaming his reading comprehension problems on
others, noted.
And you are brainded due to rabies.
WTF is "BRAINDED?
incoherently
No brains in Cujo.
Yes, Cujo aka Kevin Fries is nothing but a puffed up troll.
He suffers from extreme rabies.
CujoDeSockpuppet aka Kevin Fries is known as the Troll-in-Residence at
the poetry newsgroups.
😏--
--
Poetry and songs of Will Dockery:
https://www.reverbnation.com/willdockery
"Blueshirt" <blueshirt@indigo.news> posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their
"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
Actually I saw the Peter Cushing movie adaptation of Dr. Who in a movie >theater when I was a young lad, although I wasn't aware of what I was
seeing at the time.
But Tom Baker was definitely my first,band still favorite.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.)
style...
That's right, didn't Alan Moore write sone of those Dr. Who comics?
----
Poetry and songs of Will Dockery:
https://www.reverbnation.com/willdockery
Belguim 4 USA 1
On 06/07/2026 19:09, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Everyone has to support Belgium after Donald Trump
blackmailed the corrupt pieces of shit running Fifa
to suspend a red card given to a USA player.
Yes. It's all as corrupt as fuck.
Go Belgium!
Belgium thrashed them 4 - 1.
On 06/07/2026 20:37, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <112goga$25p0l$1@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
There were no incarnations of the Doctor before Hartnell.
The Doctor is not and was never a mass murdering, race and
gender swapping, genocidal monster from another dimension,
nor a homosexual, nor a transgender woman or transgender
man.
Yes, I agree.
See? We both ignored it. :-)
No we didn't. It's taken over and destroyed the entire
franchise.
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dd9t$2a9u$33 @gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <xn0prwt7u6kmeb001>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their
"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.)
style...
What to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent
Blueshirt wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
retconning it will make it go away.
That's true, retconning can change anything, but not always
for the better.
Yeah, just imagine... a new "Doctor Who" showrunner comes in and
retcons the things that the vocal minority want retconned... and
then we end up with something a whole lot worse!!!
I say leave well alone and move on...
The Doctor wrote:
Belguim 4 USA 1
Or, Justice 4 Corruption 1
Goodbye Pochettino!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 06/07/2026 19:09, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Everyone has to support Belgium after Donald Trump
blackmailed the corrupt pieces of shit running Fifa
to suspend a red card given to a USA player.
Yes. It's all as corrupt as fuck.
Go Belgium!
Belgium thrashed them 4 - 1.
I wonder if Trump phoned Infantino about that to see if anything
could be done...
:-)
The True Doctor wrote:
On 06/07/2026 20:37, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <112goga$25p0l$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
There were no incarnations of the Doctor before Hartnell.
The Doctor is not and was never a mass murdering, race and
gender swapping, genocidal monster from another dimension,
nor a homosexual, nor a transgender woman or transgender
man.
Yes, I agree.
See? We both ignored it. :-)
No we didn't. It's taken over and destroyed the entire
franchise.
How could it take over a franchise that ended in 2017 if
it happened after that?
You can't destroy something that doesn't exist!
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dd9t$2a9u$33
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <xn0prwt7u6kmeb001>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their
"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.)
style...
What to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent
That's CujoDeSockpuppet aka Kevin Fries, as usual, blaming someone else
for his reading comprehension problems.
And so it goes.
😏
This response appears in the discussion at: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=706275752#706275752--
--
Via JLA Forums web gateway for rec.arts.drwho: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=668
Blueshirt wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
retconning it will make it go away.
That's true, retconning can change anything, but not always
for the better.
Yeah, just imagine... a new "Doctor Who" showrunner comes in and
retcons the things that the vocal minority want retconned... and
then we end up with something a whole lot worse!!!
I say leave well alone and move on...
That's true, not all retcons are for the better.
This response appears in the discussion at: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=706275752#706275752--
--
Via JLA Forums web gateway for rec.arts.drwho: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=668
ERROR "unexpected byte sequence starting at index 2504: '\xF0'" while decoding:
In article <1783403936-3274@newsgrouper.org>,
Will Dockery <user3274@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
In article <XnsB4804B81268CDPantyheadPoorHouse@157.180.91.226>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dd9t$2a9u$33
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <xn0prwt7u6kmeb001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their
"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.)
style...
Whatever to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent
Cujo blaming his reading comprehension problems on others again, noted.
And you are brainded due to rabies.
Probably not that far from the truth.
Brain dead Cujo for you.
ð
ERROR "unexpected byte sequence starting at index 3449: '\xF0'" while decoding:
In article <1783414980-3274@newsgrouper.org>,
Will Dockery <user3274@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
In article <1783295841-3274@newsgrouper.org>,
Will Dockery <user3274@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
In article <XnsB4804DF557D09PantyheadPoorHouse@157.180.91.226>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dfa2$1b8c$2
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <XnsB4804B81268CDPantyheadPoorHouse@157.180.91.226>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dd9t$2a9u$33 >> >> >>>@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <xn0prwt7u6kmeb001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their
"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia >> >> >>>>>> began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.)
style...
Whatever to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent
Again, CujoDeSockpuppet blaming his reading comprehension problems on >others, noted.
And you are brainded due to rabies.
WTF is "BRAINDED?
incoherently
No brains in Cujo.
Yes, Cujo aka Kevin Fries is nothing but a puffed up troll.
He suffers from extreme rabies.
CujoDeSockpuppet aka Kevin Fries is known as the Troll-in-Residence at
the poetry newsgroups.
To be dealt with accordingly.
ð
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
ERROR "unexpected byte sequence starting at index 2504: '\xF0'" while >decoding:
In article <1783403936-3274@newsgrouper.org>,
Will Dockery <user3274@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
In article <XnsB4804B81268CDPantyheadPoorHouse@157.180.91.226>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dd9t$2a9u$33
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <xn0prwt7u6kmeb001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Will-Dockery wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their
"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.)
style...
Whatever to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent
Cujo blaming his reading comprehension problems on others again, noted.
And you are brainded due to rabies.
Probably not that far from the truth.
Brain dead Cujo for you.
ð
Cujo is truly a worthless cyberbully troll.
----
Poetry and songs of Will Dockery:
https://www.reverbnation.com/willdockery
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
ERROR "unexpected byte sequence starting at index 3449: '\xF0'" while >decoding:
In article <1783414980-3274@newsgrouper.org>,
Will Dockery <user3274@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
In article <1783295841-3274@newsgrouper.org>,
Will Dockery <user3274@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
In article <XnsB4804DF557D09PantyheadPoorHouse@157.180.91.226>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dfa2$1b8c$2
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <XnsB4804B81268CDPantyheadPoorHouse@157.180.91.226>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dd9t$2a9u$33 >> >> >> >>>@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <xn0prwt7u6kmeb001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their
"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia >> >> >> >>>>>> began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it >> >> >> >>>>>> was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.)
style...
Whatever to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent
Again, CujoDeSockpuppet blaming his reading comprehension problems on
others, noted.
And you are brainded due to rabies.
WTF is "BRAINDED?
incoherently
No brains in Cujo.
Yes, Cujo aka Kevin Fries is nothing but a puffed up troll.
He suffers from extreme rabies.
CujoDeSockpuppet aka Kevin Fries is known as the Troll-in-Residence at
the poetry newsgroups.
To be dealt with accordingly.
ð
Good luck, Kevin Fries is a weird one.
----
Poetry and songs of Will Dockery:
https://www.reverbnation.com/willdockery
The Doctor wrote:
In article <1783483517>,
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
ERROR "unexpected byte sequence starting at index 3449: '\xF0'" while
decoding:
In article <1783414980>,
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
In article <1783295841>,
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
In article <XnsB4804DF557D09PantyheadPoorHouse>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dfa2$1b8c$2
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <XnsB4804B81268CDPantyheadPoorHouse>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dd9t$2a9u$33
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <xn0prwt7u6kmeb001>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their
"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.)
style...
Whatever to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent
Again, CujoDeSockpuppet blaming his reading comprehension problems on
others, noted.
And you are brainded due to rabies.
WTF is "BRAINDED?
incoherently
No brains in Cujo.
Yes, Cujo aka Kevin Fries is nothing but a puffed up troll.
He suffers from extreme rabies.
CujoDeSockpuppet aka Kevin Fries is known as the Troll-in-Residence at
the poetry newsgroups.
To be dealt with accordingly.
😏
Good luck, Kevin Fries is a weird one.
Target accordingly.
--
Exactly '
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; 31 years in the ISP business!
The Doctor wrote:AntiChrist rising!
In article <1783483517>,
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
ERROR "unexpected byte sequence starting at index 3449: '\xF0'" while
decoding:
In article <1783414980>,
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
In article <1783295841>,
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
In article <XnsB4804DF557D09PantyheadPoorHouse>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dfa2$1b8c$2
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <XnsB4804B81268CDPantyheadPoorHouse>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dd9t$2a9u$33
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <xn0prwt7u6kmeb001>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their
"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.)
style...
Whatever to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent
Again, CujoDeSockpuppet blaming his reading comprehension problems on
others, noted.
And you are brainded due to rabies.
WTF is "BRAINDED?
incoherently
No brains in Cujo.
Yes, Cujo aka Kevin Fries is nothing but a puffed up troll.
He suffers from extreme rabies.
CujoDeSockpuppet aka Kevin Fries is known as the Troll-in-Residence at
the poetry newsgroups.
To be dealt with accordingly.
😏
Good luck, Kevin Fries is a weird one.
Target accordingly.
--
Exactly '
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; 31 years in the ISP business!
This response appears in the discussion at: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=706275752#706275752
----
Via JLA Forums web gateway for rec.arts.drwho: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=668
The Doctor wrote:
In article <etmdnf>,
Will-Dockery <will> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <1783483517>,
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
ERROR "unexpected byte sequence starting at index 3449: '\xF0'" while
decoding:
In article <1783414980>,
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
In article <1783295841>,
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
In article <XnsB4804DF557D09PantyheadPoorHouse>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dfa2$1b8c$2
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <XnsB4804B81268CDPantyheadPoorHouse>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dd9t$2a9u$33
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <xn0prwt7u6kmeb001>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their
"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.)
style...
Whatever to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent
Again, CujoDeSockpuppet blaming his reading comprehension problems on
others, noted.
And you are brainded due to rabies.
WTF is "BRAINDED?
incoherently
No brains in Cujo.
Yes, Cujo aka Kevin Fries is nothing but a puffed up troll.
He suffers from extreme rabies.
CujoDeSockpuppet aka Kevin Fries is known as the Troll-in-Residence at
the poetry newsgroups.
To be dealt with accordingly.
😏
Good luck, Kevin Fries is a weird one.
Target accordingly.
--
Exactly '
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; 31 years in the ISP business!
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=706275752#706275752
It works.
--
Via JLA Forums web gateway for rec.arts.drwho:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=668
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; 31 years in the ISP business!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <etmdnf>,
Will-Dockery <will> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <1783483517>,
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
ERROR "unexpected byte sequence starting at index 3449: '\xF0'"
while decoding:
In article <1783414980>,
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
In article <1783295841>,
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
In article <XnsB4804DF557D09PantyheadPoorHouse>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dfa2$1b8c$2
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <XnsB4804B81268CDPantyheadPoorHouse>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dd9t$2a9u$33
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <xn0prwt7u6kmeb001>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their
"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.)
style...
Whatever to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent
Again, CujoDeSockpuppet blaming his reading comprehension problems
on others, noted.
And you are brainded due to rabies.
WTF is "BRAINDED?
incoherently
No brains in Cujo.
Yes, Cujo aka Kevin Fries is nothing but a puffed up troll.
He suffers from extreme rabies.
CujoDeSockpuppet aka Kevin Fries is known as the Troll-in-Residence
at the poetry newsgroups.
To be dealt with accordingly.
😏
Good luck, Kevin Fries is a weird one.
Target accordingly.
--
Exactly '
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; 31 years in the ISP business!
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=706275752#706275752
It works.
--
Via JLA Forums web gateway for rec.arts.drwho:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=668
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; 31 years in
the ISP business!
Bravo, Doctor.
The Doctor wrote:AntiChrist rising!
In article <etmdnf>,
Will-Dockery <will> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <1783483517>,
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
ERROR "unexpected byte sequence starting at index 3449: '\xF0'" while
decoding:
In article <1783414980>,
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
In article <1783295841>,
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
In article <XnsB4804DF557D09PantyheadPoorHouse>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dfa2$1b8c$2
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <XnsB4804B81268CDPantyheadPoorHouse>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dd9t$2a9u$33
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <xn0prwt7u6kmeb001>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their
"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.)
style...
Whatever to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent
Again, CujoDeSockpuppet blaming his reading comprehension problems on
others, noted.
And you are brainded due to rabies.
WTF is "BRAINDED?
incoherently
No brains in Cujo.
Yes, Cujo aka Kevin Fries is nothing but a puffed up troll.
He suffers from extreme rabies.
CujoDeSockpuppet aka Kevin Fries is known as the Troll-in-Residence at
the poetry newsgroups.
To be dealt with accordingly.
😏
Good luck, Kevin Fries is a weird one.
Target accordingly.
--
Exactly '
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; 31 years in the ISP business!
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=706275752#706275752
It works.
--
Via JLA Forums web gateway for rec.arts.drwho:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=668
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; 31 years in the ISP business!
Bravo, Doctor.
😏
This response appears in the discussion at: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=706275752#706275752--
--
Via JLA Forums web gateway for rec.arts.drwho: >http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=668
The Doctor wrote:
In article <etmdnf>,
Will-Dockery <will> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <1783483517>,
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
ERROR "unexpected byte sequence starting at index 3449: '\xF0'"
while decoding:
In article <1783414980>,
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
In article <1783295841>,
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
In article <XnsB4804DF557D09PantyheadPoorHouse>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dfa2$1b8c$2
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <XnsB4804B81268CDPantyheadPoorHouse>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:112dd9t$2a9u$33
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
In article <xn0prwt7u6kmeb001>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt> wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their
"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.)
style...
Whatever to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent
Again, CujoDeSockpuppet blaming his reading comprehension problems
on others, noted.
And you are brainded due to rabies.
WTF is "BRAINDED?
incoherently
No brains in Cujo.
Yes, Cujo aka Kevin Fries is nothing but a puffed up troll.
He suffers from extreme rabies.
CujoDeSockpuppet aka Kevin Fries is known as the Troll-in-Residence
at the poetry newsgroups.
To be dealt with accordingly.
😏
Good luck, Kevin Fries is a weird one.
Target accordingly.
--
Exactly '
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; 31 years in the ISP business!
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=706275752#706275752
It works.
--
Via JLA Forums web gateway for rec.arts.drwho:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=668
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; 31 years in
the ISP business!
Bravo, Doctor.
Slurp more, Douchebag!
--
"The fact that it doesn't apply to the poem is of little consequence to
you, because your poems don't have a literary basis, because you're >functionally illiterate and haven't got a clue as to what a poem is." - >Little Willie Douchebag gets another asskicking from Pendragon
ERROR "unexpected byte sequence starting at index 3367: '\xF0'" while decoding:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in news:_F2dnSPk5eS6J9L3nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <etmdnf>,
Will Dockery <will> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <1783483517>,
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
In article <1783414980>,
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker eraIt works.
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their
"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.)
style...
Whatever to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent
Again, CujoDeSockpuppet blaming his reading comprehension problems
on others, noted.
And you are brainded due to rabies.
WTF is "BRAINDED?
incoherently
No brains in Cujo.
Yes, Cujo aka Kevin Fries is nothing but a puffed up troll.
He suffers from extreme rabies.
CujoDeSockpuppet aka Kevin Fries is known as the Troll-in-Residence
at the poetry newsgroups.
To be dealt with accordingly.
ð
Good luck, Kevin Fries is a weird one.
Target accordingly.
Exactly '
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; 31 years in the ISP business!
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=706275752#706275752
--
Via JLA Forums web gateway for rec.arts.drwho:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=668
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; 31 years in
the ISP business!
Bravo, Doctor.
Slurp
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> posted:
ERROR "unexpected byte sequence starting at index 3367: '\xF0'" while >decoding:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
news:_F2dnSPk5eS6J9L3nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <etmdnf>,
Will Dockery <will> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <1783483517>,
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
In article <1783414980>,
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker eraIt works.
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their
"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.)
style...
Whatever to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent
Again, CujoDeSockpuppet blaming his reading comprehension problems
on others, noted.
And you are brainded due to rabies.
WTF is "BRAINDED?
incoherently
No brains in Cujo.
Yes, Cujo aka Kevin Fries is nothing but a puffed up troll.
He suffers from extreme rabies.
CujoDeSockpuppet aka Kevin Fries is known as the Troll-in-Residence
at the poetry newsgroups.
To be dealt with accordingly.
ð
Good luck, Kevin Fries is a weird one.
Target accordingly.
Exactly '
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; 31 years in the ISP business!
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=706275752#706275752
--
Via JLA Forums web gateway for rec.arts.drwho:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=668
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; 31 years in
the ISP business!
Bravo, Doctor.
Slurp
All in your imagination, Cujo.
😏--
--
Poetry and songs of Will Dockery:
https://www.reverbnation.com/willdockery
The Doctor wrote:
In article <1783661840>,
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
ERROR "unexpected byte sequence starting at index 3367: '\xF0'" while
decoding:
will.dockery@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Will-Dockery) wrote in
news:_F2dnSPk5eS6J9L3nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <etmdnf>,
Will Dockery <will> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <1783483517>,
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted:
In article <1783414980>,
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote:
In my opinion a reboot of the style of the Tom Baker era
would be a splendid new track.
That was my first exposure to Dr. Who and in fact for almost
everyone I know.
Any American fans I've ever had any contact with started their
"Doctor Who" journey with Tom Baker's Doctor.
The good thing about that was, it probably was the best place
to jump aboard. That era was the peak era of the show.
The bad thing about it is, it was all downhill after that.
Georgia Public Television, Channel 28 in Warm Springs, Georgia
began airing the Tom Baker episodes on Sunday nights and the
local, small science fiction audience in this area wS
captivated for the short while the episodes aired here, 1978
to around early 1980.
PBS brought Doctor Who to a new audience and created a lot of
the American fandom we have now.
The style and look of the Tom Baker era became iconic, and it
was solidified a couple of years later when Marvel Comics
began representing the British Dr. Who comic books, which
featured the Doctor drawn in the Tom Baker style.
Four issues of "Marvel Premier" and then around twenty odd
issues of "Doctor Who" comic featuring colourised versions of
some DWM strips, mainly Fourth Doctor stories.
I feel like this style should be revisited, much like Star
Trek is going with Strange New Worlds and the look of TOS.
I'd certainly love to see the comics revisited! New Fourth
Doctor stories done in that Mills/Wagner/Moore/Gibbons (etc.)
style...
Whatever to retcon the timeless child.
Geez, you're as incoherent
Again, CujoDeSockpuppet blaming his reading comprehension problems
on others, noted.
And you are brainded due to rabies.
WTF is "BRAINDED?
incoherently
No brains in Cujo.
Yes, Cujo aka Kevin Fries is nothing but a puffed up troll.
He suffers from extreme rabies.
CujoDeSockpuppet aka Kevin Fries is known as the Troll-in-Residence
at the poetry newsgroups.
To be dealt with accordingly.
😏
Good luck, Kevin Fries is a weird one.
Target accordingly.
Exactly '
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; 31 years in the ISP business!
This response appears in the discussion at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=706275752#706275752
It works.
--
Via JLA Forums web gateway for rec.arts.drwho:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=668
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware
AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; 31 years in
the ISP business!
Bravo, Doctor.
Slurp
All in your imagination, Cujo.
He is extremely tasteless!
😏
That's why the regulars at the poetry newsgoup call Cujo our Troll-in-Residence.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; 31 years in the ISP business!
| Sysop: | Scott Duensing |
|---|---|
| Location: | Freeburg, IL, USA, Earth |
| Users: | 5 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 495479:57:07 |
| Calls: | 5 |
| Messages: | 23,642 |