From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho
In article <10g6l06$a0k0$
1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <
daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 24/11/2025 10:13 am, Dumas Walker wrote:
On 23/11/2025 1:51 am, StanWeiss wrote:
Definitions from Oxford Languages bink.y /.biNGk./ nountrademark
in US noun: binky; plural noun: binkies; noun: binkie
a pacifier.
Sorry! Is that "a pacifier" as in a "baby's dummy"??
I think it is, i.e. something for a baby to suck on besides their
thumbs, a bottle, or a teet.
I was gunna post "WHAT?? Don't baby's suck on Boobs any more??" but then
I realised that was probably what you meant by "teet"!! Although
WikiDiff wants it spelt 'teat'.
So am I calling Binky a "baby's dummy"?? Seems appropriate!
I am actually surprised that binky is trademarked in the US
Or is it just the Binky claims "Binky" is trademarked??
unless it is a brand name. The only people I have ever heard call a
pacifier a "binky" are usually not of US origin.
Binky is a Pom by birth!
^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
Here in the USA I have only ever heard them called "pacifier" and
"passee" by natives.
* SLMR 2.1a * Trespassers will be shot, survivors will be shot
again!
--
Daniel70
--
Member - Liberal International This is
doctor@nk.ca Ici
doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
All I want to hear from JEsus Christ is WEll done Good and Faithful servant
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2