From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

I was considering posting two separate reviews but since the first two episodes of TWBLS were shown back-to-back and the writing and directing
is the most horrendous, amateurish, childish, and insulting I have ever
seen, and consists of nothing more than a thin veil for a woke lecture
filled with unsubstantiated lies and propaganda I'm going to review them
both together.

I'm will review this story written by Pete McTighe and created by Russel
T Davies in comparison to Interstellar by Christopher Nolan since both
contain an environmentalist message.

While one is well written and the environmentalist message, which easily
falls apart on careful consideration, is simply there to set up a
situation where the human race needs to colonise extra terrestrial
planets in order to survive, ushered on by a seemingly alien but in
actuality Earth originating intelligence, serves the science fiction
which always takes precedence and does not seek to be woke or lecture
the audience, the other is pure degenerate woke lecturing spreading
downright lies, mistruths, and misinformation, using science fiction as
as a means to capture an audience and indoctrinate them with a one sided
false narrative which overwhelms everting, resulting in the most
appalling, infantile, and totally horrendous and insulting writing I
have ever witnessed by a clueless and talentless soap opera hack and
political play-write who is incapable of writing any better then an undedicated infant.

It all tarts off with a humanoid fish lizard being caught up in a
fishing trawler’s nets in the Mediterranean and as soon as the fishermen
see it they shoot it dead. Why are these fishermen carrying guns on a
fishing boat in the middle of the Med? Why have they got them already
pointing at the fish lizard the moment the nets are pulled up? It's as
if they were deliberately hunting the fish lizard to begin with. Why
isn't this explained? Why have the fishermen caught the fish lizard? Is
it by accident or design? The writing is absolute shit from the very
beginning as is the directing.

The shooting of this fish lizard and then another causes other fish
lizards to retaliate by killing two humans in revenge. Why? We still
don't know if the fish lizards were first hunted down and then killed or
not. The writing is total garbage. More about garbage later.

Then the fish lizards all decide to reveal themselves to mankind because apparently as we learn later two of their hatchlings have been killed by pollution in the oceans. Like this is only supposed to have only ever
happened now and not before? Humanity went by for hundreds of thousands
of years, decades, centuries polluting the seas and oceans and no fish
lizards ever died as a result of it until now? The writing is absolute excrement, just like the plot. Even the fish lizards complain about the excrement in the seas. What about their excrement? Don't fish shit in
the water as they swim? Total hypocrisy.

Oh, did I mention that these fish lizards can also fluidly change gender
as they choose? I think I predicted they would months ago.

So the fish lizards want to communicate with mankind and we are
subjected to 20 minutes of insulting padding showing attempts at
translating their language or squeals, and newscasts documenting their appearances. This is totally unnecessary exposition which tells us
nothing about the non-existent plot or motivations of the fish lizards
or humans.

An imbecilic, socially inept effeminate moron played played by the gay
actor Russell Tovey is chosen by accident to be the ambassador for mankind.

The degenerate hypocrite Russell T Davies told everyone that only gay
actors were suitable for playing the roles of gay characters, so why has
an unconvincing gay actor playing what would appear to be a heterosexual character been inflicted on the audience?

After he is activated by UNIT, Tovey is shown being woken up by what
appears to be an obese mixed race male character who at first I believed
to be his male lover. Then he drives off with this character who is
about the same height as him to this black woman's house, and I start to question if this character is actually male when she starts embracing
the other black woman. What the fuck is going on? Are they lesbians?
Bisexual? A manage a trois?

Oh, so she's supposed to be his daughter? Why the fuck doesn't she even
look like him? I thought he was gay. He acts and behaves like he's gay. Haven't the producers and director got a clue how to cast people in appropriate roles so they look convincing?

Now we come to Interstellar. Interstellar was about the main
protagonist's relationship with his daughter. Everything was written
around that relationship and from the characterisation of the daughter
and the main protagonist’s son and their grandfather and their
relationships with each other you could predict everything that followed
in the plot, every motivation for why they did what they did and why
they did it and even what they ending would be, in the first 5 minutes.
Those relationships were embedded into the plot in order to serve and
evolve the plot and were all necessary. In contrast there is no plot development, characterisation or character development at all concerning Tovey's daughter or apparently ex-wife. They serve no purpose whatsoever
in evolving the story, because there is no story. They're degenerate
soap opera filler created to waste time by a clueless infantile writer
who doesn't understand the basics of writing or story telling. Why have
them there at all, unless it's the woke political messaging to show a
mixed race relationship? They serve no purpose at all.

The degenerate clueless writer assumes everyone already knows who the
Sea Devils are and who the Doctor is, which is another example of his ineptitude and bad writing. The Doctor is totally irrelevant to this
story so why waste time talking about him instead of developing the
characters in this specific story in a meaningful manner as in
Interstellar?

Why would the audience know the whole backstory of the Sea Devils? Show
not tell. The writer and director don't have a clue. Nothing is shown
from the Sea Devils stand point. Why are they accepted by the humans as
being superior when they have not demonstrated that on screen? Why
aren't the being nuked as soon as they appear?

In one scene we are shown two humans sucked into the sand by the Sea
Devils. In the next scene a military General with an American accent
tries looking for them and calling them on the radio wondering where
they are for minutes on end. The audience already knows they've been
killed by the fish lizards, so there is no mystery or tension in this
scene at all. No one gives a clue about the General or the 'red shirts' because none of them were given any character or character development.
It's a complete waste of time. The director and writer don't have a clue.

To these woke imbeciles the writing doesn't matter. It comes a poor
second place to the political messaging.

The imbecilic morons don't even understand basic biology. Homo is a
genus for humans so why have they named the fish lizards Homer Aqua?
They're bloody reptiles so can't be part of the genus Homo, but all the imbeciles can do is have Tovey tell his hideously obese daughter that
that Homo doesn't mean Gay. How about telling her what a Genus is and
why it is being applied to the fish lizards incorrectly, and educate people?

Why has Tovey even been mistaken for the real guy UNIT sent for as
Ambassador? All government employees should be wearing identity tags
which denote their position and rank, so they should have known from the
start Tovey was not their man. Why didn't they check his ID for fuck's
sake? They ejected the guy that Tovey took the place of when he tried to
enter the government building the fish lizards had chosen for their conference, so why didn't security ask for Tovey's ID ever? Fucking
morons for writers!

And then all the woke lecturing begins from the mouthpiece of the fish lizards. Lie, after lie, after lie, after lie, after lie putting down
humans and humanity and accusing them of polluting the rives, the seas,
and the oceans, without any opposing argument whatsoever.

You learn about the Water Cycle in basic O-Level Geography. You learn
about various vicious circles, and about how humans need to battle and
break them to survive. All of this is thrown out of the window by the degenerate imbecilic woke writers and their hatred of their own species.
It's an insult to every viewer's intelligence. Don't the fish lizards understand that sewerage is processed before it is dumped into the sea
and the Water Cycle? They all come across as a bunch or self centred,
self serving, ignorant, hate filled bigots, just like the writers
themselves. Logic and reason and the survival of humanity is ridiculed
by the creation of a bunch of straw horses including a parody of Nigel
Farage.

The fish lizards present the humans with one impossible ultimatum after another and start making impossible demands (like Vladimir Putin
refusing to make peace with Ukraine unless Ukraine gives up all of it's territory to Russia) and then they shower all the land on Earth with
plastic bottles and other garbage plucked out of all the oceans, seas,
rives, and waterways. This is totally laughable childish writing.

Do the infantile writers, McTighe and Davie think that this will
engender support for their cause? A complete pack of lies,
disinformation and unsubstantiated extremist propaganda that can easily
be fact checked and proven to be false. Plastic bottles are either
recycled and put into landfill, not thrown into the sea. The
overwhelming 99.9999% of anything that does end up in the sea is bio-degradable and totally harmless.

And then the fish lizards decide to drop the wreck of the Titanic into
the middle of New York.

What a complete pile of excrement!

Earlier Tovey is asked to drink dirty water from the Thames to show it's undrinkable because it's full of deadly microbes. Those microbes are not
the fault of humans. Legionella evolved naturally in stagnant
air-conditioning units, not from pollution. Cholera is caused by a
bacteria that naturally spreads in stagnant water. One sided crap after
one sided crap that no one is allowed to refute.

Finally at the end of the second episode Tovey is forced to agree to
meet the fish lizards at the bottom of a 5 mile deep ocean trench in the middle of the Atlantic, which is basically impossible.

Absolute complete and utter garbage is all this story is about and all
this story is.

0/10 for both episodes.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for." --William Shatner

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <10h5v49$te$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:

I was considering posting two separate reviews but since the first two >episodes of TWBLS were shown back-to-back and the writing and directing
is the most horrendous, amateurish, childish, and insulting I have ever >seen, and consists of nothing more than a thin veil for a woke lecture >filled with unsubstantiated lies and propaganda I'm going to review them >both together.

I'm will review this story written by Pete McTighe and created by Russel
T Davies in comparison to Interstellar by Christopher Nolan since both >contain an environmentalist message.

While one is well written and the environmentalist message, which easily >falls apart on careful consideration, is simply there to set up a
situation where the human race needs to colonise extra terrestrial
planets in order to survive, ushered on by a seemingly alien but in >actuality Earth originating intelligence, serves the science fiction
which always takes precedence and does not seek to be woke or lecture
the audience, the other is pure degenerate woke lecturing spreading >downright lies, mistruths, and misinformation, using science fiction as
as a means to capture an audience and indoctrinate them with a one sided >false narrative which overwhelms everting, resulting in the most
appalling, infantile, and totally horrendous and insulting writing I
have ever witnessed by a clueless and talentless soap opera hack and >political play-write who is incapable of writing any better then an >undedicated infant.

It all tarts off with a humanoid fish lizard being caught up in a
fishing trawler’s nets in the Mediterranean and as soon as the fishermen >see it they shoot it dead. Why are these fishermen carrying guns on a >fishing boat in the middle of the Med? Why have they got them already >pointing at the fish lizard the moment the nets are pulled up? It's as
if they were deliberately hunting the fish lizard to begin with. Why
isn't this explained? Why have the fishermen caught the fish lizard? Is
it by accident or design? The writing is absolute shit from the very >beginning as is the directing.

The shooting of this fish lizard and then another causes other fish
lizards to retaliate by killing two humans in revenge. Why? We still
don't know if the fish lizards were first hunted down and then killed or >not. The writing is total garbage. More about garbage later.

Then the fish lizards all decide to reveal themselves to mankind because >apparently as we learn later two of their hatchlings have been killed by >pollution in the oceans. Like this is only supposed to have only ever >happened now and not before? Humanity went by for hundreds of thousands
of years, decades, centuries polluting the seas and oceans and no fish >lizards ever died as a result of it until now? The writing is absolute >excrement, just like the plot. Even the fish lizards complain about the >excrement in the seas. What about their excrement? Don't fish shit in
the water as they swim? Total hypocrisy.

Oh, did I mention that these fish lizards can also fluidly change gender
as they choose? I think I predicted they would months ago.

So the fish lizards want to communicate with mankind and we are
subjected to 20 minutes of insulting padding showing attempts at
translating their language or squeals, and newscasts documenting their >appearances. This is totally unnecessary exposition which tells us
nothing about the non-existent plot or motivations of the fish lizards
or humans.

An imbecilic, socially inept effeminate moron played played by the gay
actor Russell Tovey is chosen by accident to be the ambassador for mankind.

The degenerate hypocrite Russell T Davies told everyone that only gay
actors were suitable for playing the roles of gay characters, so why has
an unconvincing gay actor playing what would appear to be a heterosexual >character been inflicted on the audience?

After he is activated by UNIT, Tovey is shown being woken up by what
appears to be an obese mixed race male character who at first I believed
to be his male lover. Then he drives off with this character who is
about the same height as him to this black woman's house, and I start to >question if this character is actually male when she starts embracing
the other black woman. What the fuck is going on? Are they lesbians? >Bisexual? A manage a trois?

Oh, so she's supposed to be his daughter? Why the fuck doesn't she even
look like him? I thought he was gay. He acts and behaves like he's gay. >Haven't the producers and director got a clue how to cast people in >appropriate roles so they look convincing?

Now we come to Interstellar. Interstellar was about the main
protagonist's relationship with his daughter. Everything was written
around that relationship and from the characterisation of the daughter
and the main protagonist’s son and their grandfather and their >relationships with each other you could predict everything that followed
in the plot, every motivation for why they did what they did and why
they did it and even what they ending would be, in the first 5 minutes. >Those relationships were embedded into the plot in order to serve and
evolve the plot and were all necessary. In contrast there is no plot >development, characterisation or character development at all concerning >Tovey's daughter or apparently ex-wife. They serve no purpose whatsoever
in evolving the story, because there is no story. They're degenerate
soap opera filler created to waste time by a clueless infantile writer
who doesn't understand the basics of writing or story telling. Why have
them there at all, unless it's the woke political messaging to show a
mixed race relationship? They serve no purpose at all.

The degenerate clueless writer assumes everyone already knows who the
Sea Devils are and who the Doctor is, which is another example of his >ineptitude and bad writing. The Doctor is totally irrelevant to this
story so why waste time talking about him instead of developing the >characters in this specific story in a meaningful manner as in
Interstellar?

Why would the audience know the whole backstory of the Sea Devils? Show
not tell. The writer and director don't have a clue. Nothing is shown
from the Sea Devils stand point. Why are they accepted by the humans as >being superior when they have not demonstrated that on screen? Why
aren't the being nuked as soon as they appear?

In one scene we are shown two humans sucked into the sand by the Sea
Devils. In the next scene a military General with an American accent
tries looking for them and calling them on the radio wondering where
they are for minutes on end. The audience already knows they've been
killed by the fish lizards, so there is no mystery or tension in this
scene at all. No one gives a clue about the General or the 'red shirts' >because none of them were given any character or character development.
It's a complete waste of time. The director and writer don't have a clue.

To these woke imbeciles the writing doesn't matter. It comes a poor
second place to the political messaging.

The imbecilic morons don't even understand basic biology. Homo is a
genus for humans so why have they named the fish lizards Homer Aqua?
They're bloody reptiles so can't be part of the genus Homo, but all the >imbeciles can do is have Tovey tell his hideously obese daughter that
that Homo doesn't mean Gay. How about telling her what a Genus is and
why it is being applied to the fish lizards incorrectly, and educate people?

Why has Tovey even been mistaken for the real guy UNIT sent for as >Ambassador? All government employees should be wearing identity tags
which denote their position and rank, so they should have known from the >start Tovey was not their man. Why didn't they check his ID for fuck's
sake? They ejected the guy that Tovey took the place of when he tried to >enter the government building the fish lizards had chosen for their >conference, so why didn't security ask for Tovey's ID ever? Fucking
morons for writers!

And then all the woke lecturing begins from the mouthpiece of the fish >lizards. Lie, after lie, after lie, after lie, after lie putting down
humans and humanity and accusing them of polluting the rives, the seas,
and the oceans, without any opposing argument whatsoever.

You learn about the Water Cycle in basic O-Level Geography. You learn
about various vicious circles, and about how humans need to battle and
break them to survive. All of this is thrown out of the window by the >degenerate imbecilic woke writers and their hatred of their own species. >It's an insult to every viewer's intelligence. Don't the fish lizards >understand that sewerage is processed before it is dumped into the sea
and the Water Cycle? They all come across as a bunch or self centred,
self serving, ignorant, hate filled bigots, just like the writers >themselves. Logic and reason and the survival of humanity is ridiculed
by the creation of a bunch of straw horses including a parody of Nigel >Farage.

The fish lizards present the humans with one impossible ultimatum after >another and start making impossible demands (like Vladimir Putin
refusing to make peace with Ukraine unless Ukraine gives up all of it's >territory to Russia) and then they shower all the land on Earth with
plastic bottles and other garbage plucked out of all the oceans, seas, >rives, and waterways. This is totally laughable childish writing.

Do the infantile writers, McTighe and Davie think that this will
engender support for their cause? A complete pack of lies,
disinformation and unsubstantiated extremist propaganda that can easily
be fact checked and proven to be false. Plastic bottles are either
recycled and put into landfill, not thrown into the sea. The
overwhelming 99.9999% of anything that does end up in the sea is >bio-degradable and totally harmless.

And then the fish lizards decide to drop the wreck of the Titanic into
the middle of New York.

What a complete pile of excrement!

Earlier Tovey is asked to drink dirty water from the Thames to show it's >undrinkable because it's full of deadly microbes. Those microbes are not
the fault of humans. Legionella evolved naturally in stagnant >air-conditioning units, not from pollution. Cholera is caused by a
bacteria that naturally spreads in stagnant water. One sided crap after
one sided crap that no one is allowed to refute.

Finally at the end of the second episode Tovey is forced to agree to
meet the fish lizards at the bottom of a 5 mile deep ocean trench in the >middle of the Atlantic, which is basically impossible.

Absolute complete and utter garbage is all this story is about and all
this story is.

0/10 for both episodes.

RTD has lost it. How to see your review on Facebook.

How can the average on IMDB be 7/10 ?

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

The Doctor wrote:

In article <10h5v49$te$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:

Absolute complete and utter garbage is all this story
is about and all this story is.

0/10 for both episodes.

RTD has lost it. How to see your review on Facebook.

RTD is RTD. There's nothing in this series (so far) that we
didn't know would be in it.

How can the average on IMDB be 7/10 ?

Possibly because not everybody thinks the same as you.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

The True Doctor wrote:

I was considering posting two separate reviews but since the
first two episodes of TWBLS were shown back-to-back and the
writing and directing is the most horrendous, amateurish,
childish, and insulting I have ever seen, and consists of
nothing more than a thin veil for a woke lecture filled with
unsubstantiated lies and propaganda I'm going to review them
both together.

I hate your ultra-long reviews, can you not just say it's
utter garbage in five paragraphs instead of twenty?

You have to keep your readers engaged, not put them to sleep!

[Snip]

Oh, did I mention that these fish lizards can also fluidly
change gender as they choose? I think I predicted they would
months ago.

Yes, you did say something along those lines alright...

So the fish lizards want to communicate with mankind and we
are subjected to 20 minutes of insulting padding showing
attempts at translating their language or squeals,

I'm glad they addressed the Sea Devil's speech thing... even
if unsatisfactorily.

An imbecilic, socially inept effeminate moron played played
by the gay actor Russell Tovey is chosen by accident to be
the ambassador for mankind.

I like Russell Tovey in this actually.

[Snip]

The degenerate clueless writer assumes everyone already knows
who the Sea Devils are and who the Doctor is, which is another
example of his ineptitude and bad writing. The Doctor is
totally irrelevant to this story so why waste time talking
about him instead of developing the characters in this
specific story in a meaningful manner as in Interstellar?

By mentioning the Doctor I keep coming back to the issue that
if all those Sea Devils rose up in cities all around the world,
as depicted... would the Doctor really just ignore them and not
get involved? Ncuti's Doctor might have gone [somewhere], but
there's still a Doctor relaxing in London. So for me, the Doctor
should have just been ignored completely, as by mentioning him
it's just drawing attention to the fact he's not bothered to get
involved in such a major conflict alongside UNIT.

Why would the audience know the whole backstory of the Sea
Devils? Show not tell. The writer and director don't have a
clue. Nothing is shown from the Sea Devils stand point. Why
are they accepted by the humans as being superior when they
have not demonstrated that on screen? Why aren't the being
nuked as soon as they appear?

In reality, that's exactly what would happen.

If Donald Trump couldn't do a deal with them for mining rights
under the sea, BOOM!!!

To these woke imbeciles the writing doesn't matter. It comes
a poor second place to the political messaging.

There was ALWAYS going to be a political message.

It's a BBC drama in 2025 - you wouldn't expect anything else!

And then all the woke lecturing begins from the mouthpiece of
the fish lizards. Lie, after lie, after lie, after lie, after
lie putting down humans and humanity and accusing them of
polluting the rives, the seas, and the oceans, without any
opposing argument whatsoever.

Never trust a fish lizard with no breasts!

Do the infantile writers, McTighe and Davie think that this
will engender support for their cause? A complete pack of
lies, disinformation and unsubstantiated extremist propaganda
that can easily be fact checked and proven to be false.
Plastic bottles are either recycled and put into landfill, not
thrown into the sea. The overwhelming 99.9999% of anything
that does end up in the sea is bio-degradable and totally
harmless.

We all knew the message of this series was going to be
environmental damage caused by us, the people of Earth. (Which
is why I thought this series would have been broadcast around
Earth Day in 2026.) It was the raison d'être behind the whole
series.

And then the fish lizards decide to drop the wreck of the
Titanic into the middle of New York.

Not NYC!!! I've family there.

Finally at the end of the second episode Tovey is forced
to agree to meet the fish lizards at the bottom of a 5 mile
deep ocean trench in the middle of the Atlantic, which is
basically impossible.

In fairness, Pertwee's Doctor went down under the sea to meet
the Sea Devils in their caves in 1972.

Absolute complete and utter garbage is all this story is about
and all this story is.

0/10 for both episodes.

IF - and I mean IF - I was rating the first two episodes I would
have gone for something like 6/10 for Ep 1 and 5/10 for Ep 2,
but I would rather judge the whole series once I have seen all
five episodes.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho


The True loon wasn’t looking to closely:

After he is activated by UNIT, Tovey is shown being woken up by what
appears to be an obese mixed race male character who at first I believed
to be his male lover. Then he drives off with this character

You obviously weren’t paying attention.

Tovey’s character wasn’t woken up by any character but by
the loud buzzing of his top secret UNIT communicator that
he keeps hidden in his sock drawer. The he goes and wakes his kid.
Got that? Tovey is the one who wakes up the kid, not the other
way round!

And they’re obviously not lovers because they sleep in separate rooms!

Now there is a real plot hole that you missed. Tovey’s character is
an expert in booking taxis, but he doesn’t even think to call an
Uber for his kid instead of compromising security by getting the
UNIT car to take them all to his ex-wife! (RTD obviously wanted us
to see him with his ex in episode one, and couldn’t think of a
better way to do it.)
--
solar penguin
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <xn0peakvl2lfvr5003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

The Doctor wrote:

In article <10h5v49$te$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:

Absolute complete and utter garbage is all this story
is about and all this story is.

0/10 for both episodes.

RTD has lost it. How to see your review on Facebook.

RTD is RTD. There's nothing in this series (so far) that we
didn't know would be in it.

How can the average on IMDB be 7/10 ?

Possibly because not everybody thinks the same as you.

What about AGA?

Even Rooton Tomatoes ordinary reviews are going thumbs down.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <xn0pealtn2mt6qg004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

I was considering posting two separate reviews but since the
first two episodes of TWBLS were shown back-to-back and the
writing and directing is the most horrendous, amateurish,
childish, and insulting I have ever seen, and consists of
nothing more than a thin veil for a woke lecture filled with
unsubstantiated lies and propaganda I'm going to review them
both together.

I hate your ultra-long reviews, can you not just say it's
utter garbage in five paragraphs instead of twenty?

You prefer my stuff?

You have to keep your readers engaged, not put them to sleep!

Your trun BS.

[Snip]

Oh, did I mention that these fish lizards can also fluidly
change gender as they choose? I think I predicted they would
months ago.

Yes, you did say something along those lines alright...

So the fish lizards want to communicate with mankind and we
are subjected to 20 minutes of insulting padding showing
attempts at translating their language or squeals,

I'm glad they addressed the Sea Devil's speech thing... even
if unsatisfactorily.

An imbecilic, socially inept effeminate moron played played
by the gay actor Russell Tovey is chosen by accident to be
the ambassador for mankind.

I like Russell Tovey in this actually.

[Snip]

The degenerate clueless writer assumes everyone already knows
who the Sea Devils are and who the Doctor is, which is another
example of his ineptitude and bad writing. The Doctor is
totally irrelevant to this story so why waste time talking
about him instead of developing the characters in this
specific story in a meaningful manner as in Interstellar?

By mentioning the Doctor I keep coming back to the issue that
if all those Sea Devils rose up in cities all around the world,
as depicted... would the Doctor really just ignore them and not
get involved? Ncuti's Doctor might have gone [somewhere], but
there's still a Doctor relaxing in London. So for me, the Doctor
should have just been ignored completely, as by mentioning him
it's just drawing attention to the fact he's not bothered to get
involved in such a major conflict alongside UNIT.

Why would the audience know the whole backstory of the Sea
Devils? Show not tell. The writer and director don't have a
clue. Nothing is shown from the Sea Devils stand point. Why
are they accepted by the humans as being superior when they
have not demonstrated that on screen? Why aren't the being
nuked as soon as they appear?

In reality, that's exactly what would happen.

If Donald Trump couldn't do a deal with them for mining rights
under the sea, BOOM!!!

BOOM is correct.

To these woke imbeciles the writing doesn't matter. It comes
a poor second place to the political messaging.

There was ALWAYS going to be a political message.

It's a BBC drama in 2025 - you wouldn't expect anything else!

Like The Green Death?

And then all the woke lecturing begins from the mouthpiece of
the fish lizards. Lie, after lie, after lie, after lie, after
lie putting down humans and humanity and accusing them of
polluting the rives, the seas, and the oceans, without any
opposing argument whatsoever.

Never trust a fish lizard with no breasts!

Do the infantile writers, McTighe and Davie think that this
will engender support for their cause? A complete pack of
lies, disinformation and unsubstantiated extremist propaganda
that can easily be fact checked and proven to be false.
Plastic bottles are either recycled and put into landfill, not
thrown into the sea. The overwhelming 99.9999% of anything
that does end up in the sea is bio-degradable and totally
harmless.

We all knew the message of this series was going to be
environmental damage caused by us, the people of Earth. (Which
is why I thought this series would have been broadcast around
Earth Day in 2026.) It was the raison d'être behind the whole
series.

And then the fish lizards decide to drop the wreck of the
Titanic into the middle of New York.

Not NYC!!! I've family there.

Finally at the end of the second episode Tovey is forced
to agree to meet the fish lizards at the bottom of a 5 mile
deep ocean trench in the middle of the Atlantic, which is
basically impossible.

In fairness, Pertwee's Doctor went down under the sea to meet
the Sea Devils in their caves in 1972.

Absolute complete and utter garbage is all this story is about
and all this story is.

0/10 for both episodes.

IF - and I mean IF - I was rating the first two episodes I would
have gone for something like 6/10 for Ep 1 and 5/10 for Ep 2,
but I would rather judge the whole series once I have seen all
five episodes.

As you like it.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <10h6q5s$7a86$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:

The True loon wasn’t looking to closely:

After he is activated by UNIT, Tovey is shown being woken up by what
appears to be an obese mixed race male character who at first I believed
to be his male lover. Then he drives off with this character

You obviously weren’t paying attention.

Tovey’s character wasn’t woken up by any character but by
the loud buzzing of his top secret UNIT communicator that
he keeps hidden in his sock drawer. The he goes and wakes his kid.
Got that? Tovey is the one who wakes up the kid, not the other
way round!

And they’re obviously not lovers because they sleep in separate rooms!

Now there is a real plot hole that you missed. Tovey’s character is
an expert in booking taxis, but he doesn’t even think to call an
Uber for his kid instead of compromising security by getting the
UNIT car to take them all to his ex-wife! (RTD obviously wanted us
to see him with his ex in episode one, and couldn’t think of a
better way to do it.)

subplots for you.

--
solar penguin

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

On 08/12/2025 15:17, solar imbecile wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

After he is activated by UNIT, Tovey is shown being woken up by what
appears to be an obese mixed race male character who at first I believed
to be his male lover. Then he drives off with this character

You obviously weren’t paying attention.

Tovey’s character wasn’t woken up by any character but by
the loud buzzing of his top secret UNIT communicator that
he keeps hidden in his sock drawer. The he goes and wakes his kid.
Got that? Tovey is the one who wakes up the kid, not the other
way round!

What is the purpose of having this kid there in the first place then?

Unlike the girl in Interstellar this stupid kid has absolutely nothing
to do with the story development or the plot.

She isn't even of any use waking up her supposed father. Supposed
because she looks nothing like him.

And they’re obviously not lovers because they sleep in separate rooms!

That was not made clear due to the bad directing. They looked like gay
lovers to me.

Now there is a real plot hole that you missed. Tovey’s character is
an expert in booking taxis, but he doesn’t even think to call an
Uber for his kid instead of compromising security by getting the

Why would he want to leave his kid alone and unsupervised with someone
who could be a complete pervert as anyone can drive for Uber because
there's no proper police background checks like you get with proper taxi firms?

UNIT car to take them all to his ex-wife! (RTD obviously wanted us
to see him with his ex in episode one, and couldn’t think of a
better way to do it.)

Because he's a shit writer along with Pete McTighe. All that this
degenerate can come up with is totally irrelevant soap opera drivel.
Compare with Interstellar where all the character relationships drive
the actual plot.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for." --William Shatner
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <10h6ua2$8hi6$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:

On 08/12/2025 15:17, solar imbecile wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

After he is activated by UNIT, Tovey is shown being woken up by what
appears to be an obese mixed race male character who at first I believed >>> to be his male lover. Then he drives off with this character

You obviously weren’t paying attention.

Tovey’s character wasn’t woken up by any character but by
the loud buzzing of his top secret UNIT communicator that
he keeps hidden in his sock drawer. The he goes and wakes his kid.
Got that? Tovey is the one who wakes up the kid, not the other
way round!

What is the purpose of having this kid there in the first place then?

Unlike the girl in Interstellar this stupid kid has absolutely nothing
to do with the story development or the plot.

She isn't even of any use waking up her supposed father. Supposed
because she looks nothing like him.

And they’re obviously not lovers because they sleep in separate rooms!

That was not made clear due to the bad directing. They looked like gay >lovers to me.

Now there is a real plot hole that you missed. Tovey’s character is
an expert in booking taxis, but he doesn’t even think to call an
Uber for his kid instead of compromising security by getting the

Why would he want to leave his kid alone and unsupervised with someone
who could be a complete pervert as anyone can drive for Uber because
there's no proper police background checks like you get with proper taxi >firms?

UNIT car to take them all to his ex-wife! (RTD obviously wanted us
to see him with his ex in episode one, and couldn’t think of a
better way to do it.)

Because he's a s*t writer along with Pete McTighe. All that this
degenerate can come up with is totally irrelevant soap opera drivel.
Compare with Interstellar where all the character relationships drive
the actual plot.

Bad enough KLS pulled off a Gridlock.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

The Doctor wrote:

In article <xn0pealtn2mt6qg004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

I hate your ultra-long reviews, can you not just say
it's utter garbage in five paragraphs instead of twenty?

You prefer my stuff?

Steady on old chap... I never said THAT!!!
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

The Doctor wrote:

In article <xn0peakvl2lfvr5003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

The Doctor wrote:

How can the average on IMDB be 7/10 ?

Possibly because not everybody thinks the same as
you.

What about AGA?

I think most of us knew what he'd think of it long before
it aired!

Even Rotton Tomatoes ordinary reviews are going thumbs
down.

Good for them. They are not here though are they... so they
don't count.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

solar penguin wrote:

Tovey’s character wasn’t woken up by any character but
by the loud buzzing of his top secret UNIT communicator
that he keeps hidden in his sock drawer. The he goes and
wakes his kid. Got that? Tovey is the one who wakes up the
kid, not the other way round!

Methinks the kid and the ex-wife will be playing a part in
later episodes...
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

The True Doctor wrote:

What is the purpose of having this kid there in the first
place then?

As RTD's writing is about as subtle as a sledge-hammer, I'd
say the kid will be back. He'll probably be put in danger
somehow and need rescuing by his Dad, with help from the fish
lizard with no breasts... or something.

Unlike the girl in Interstellar this stupid kid has absolutely
nothing to do with the story development or the plot.

You've only seen two episodes out of five, remember.

It's RTD... if there's a kid there, he's there for a reason.

Stay tuned.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho


Blueshirt blindsided the loon:

The True Doctor wrote:

What is the purpose of having this kid there in the first
place then?

As RTD's writing is about as subtle as a sledge-hammer, I'd
say the kid will be back. He'll probably be put in danger
somehow and need rescuing by his Dad, with help from the fish
lizard with no breasts... or something.

Unlike the girl in Interstellar this stupid kid has absolutely
nothing to do with the story development or the plot.

You've only seen two episodes out of five, remember.

It's RTD... if there's a kid there, he's there for a reason.

Stay tuned.

And if Barclay’s family weren’t introduced before they become
important in episode four or five, Aggy would be complaining that
we should’ve seen them before!

He’s never happy.
--
solar penguin
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

solar penguin wrote:

Blueshirt blindsided the loon:

The True Doctor wrote:

What is the purpose of having this kid there in the first
place then?

You've only seen two episodes out of five, remember.

It's RTD... if there's a kid there, he's there for a reason.

And if Barclay’s family weren’t introduced before they become
important in episode four or five, Aggy would be complaining
that we should’ve seen them before!

The fact Barclay's family were a large part of the focus in
the second episode, and not just put away somewhere for the
duration of the story, clearly means they will play a part in
the proceedings... beyond Barclay and his kid having a cuddle
on the sofa in the hotel room or them getting blown away by
rubbish! So yeah, they couldn't just be thrown in for the
episode five climax.

As always, they are there for a reason. Aggy should be aware
of how stories work. He is our resident professor of literature
after all. Plus, we all know RTD likes his soap opera moments
too. So my money is on Barclay and his missus reconciling at
the end too, making Kirby happier than a fish lizard in water.

He’s never happppy

AGA does get a bit carried away with his angst at times.

I mean, over twenty paragraphs for a review of just two
episodes! Even the journalist writing the review in The
Guardian was more concise!!! ;-)
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

On 08/12/2025 18:23, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

What is the purpose of having this kid there in the first
place then?

As RTD's writing is about as subtle as a sledge-hammer, I'd
say the kid will be back. He'll probably be put in danger
somehow and need rescuing by his Dad, with help from the fish
lizard with no breasts... or something.

Unlike the girl in Interstellar this stupid kid has absolutely
nothing to do with the story development or the plot.

You've only seen two episodes out of five, remember.

I figured out the daughter's significance and pivotal role in the plot
and the major plot twist in the first 5 minutes of Interstellar and
still kept watching for almost 3 hours to find out if I was right.

It's RTD... if there's a kid there, he's there for a reason.

RTD and the fool McTighe don't have the remotest clue how to write.
They're talentless soap opera hacks not science fiction writers.

Stay tuned.

I don't feel like watching any of the remaining episodes. You can easily figure out the pattern. Each week it was be yet another racist and
bigoted woke attack on the entire human race blaming them for all the
fish lizards problems, the death of their people, the pollution of their
water and their air, the theft of their gas and oil, the destruction of
their cites, the failure of their economy, the appropriation of their
culture, we are the superior beings, etc., etc., ...

These imbecilic far-left woke degenerates that date to call themselves
writers are going to write another Mein Kampf in their own image.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for." --William Shatner
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

On 08/12/2025 19:58, solar penguin wrote:

Blueshirt blindsided the loon:

The True Doctor wrote:

What is the purpose of having this kid there in the first
place then?

As RTD's writing is about as subtle as a sledge-hammer, I'd
say the kid will be back. He'll probably be put in danger
somehow and need rescuing by his Dad, with help from the fish
lizard with no breasts... or something.

Unlike the girl in Interstellar this stupid kid has absolutely
nothing to do with the story development or the plot.

You've only seen two episodes out of five, remember.

It's RTD... if there's a kid there, he's there for a reason.

Stay tuned.

And if Barclay’s family weren’t introduced before they become
important in episode four or five, Aggy would be complaining that
we should’ve seen them before!

He’s never happy.

They've not even been introduced properly to begin with. They're their
as irrelevant, mind numbing, soap opera padding to fill 5 epsiodes
because Davies and McTighe don't have the remotest clue how to write
science fiction or how to the create and develop intelligent characters
and plot based characterisation.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for." --William Shatner
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

On 08/12/2025 21:05, Blueshirt wrote:

solar penguin wrote:

Blueshirt blindsided the loon:

The True Doctor wrote:

What is the purpose of having this kid there in the first
place then?

You've only seen two episodes out of five, remember.

It's RTD... if there's a kid there, he's there for a reason.

And if Barclay’s family weren’t introduced before they become
important in episode four or five, Aggy would be complaining
that we should’ve seen them before!

The fact Barclay's family were a large part of the focus in
the second episode, and not just put away somewhere for the
duration of the story, clearly means they will play a part in
the proceedings... beyond Barclay and his kid having a cuddle

No it doesn't. It clearly show that Davies and McTighe are totally shit writers who don't understand character, characterisation, or character dependent plot development. Interstellar shows you how to do it properly.

on the sofa in the hotel room or them getting blown away by
rubbish! So yeah, they couldn't just be thrown in for the
episode five climax.

As always, they are there for a reason. Aggy should be aware

Not with how Davies writes. Look at the crap he wrote for Gatwa's final episode and the totally bullshit surrounding Ruby Sunday who turned out
to mean nothing.

of how stories work. He is our resident professor of literature

I'm aware that neither Davies or McTighe can't writer them. All their interested is attacking and lecturing their audience with degenerate far
left political messages and false narratives.

after all. Plus, we all know RTD likes his soap opera moments
too. So my money is on Barclay and his missus reconciling at
the end too, making Kirby happier than a fish lizard in water.

I don't give a fuck about Tovey, his ex, or his repulsive obese
son/daughter. I always cared about Matthew McConaughey's character and
that of his daughter and her brother from the first 5 minutes of
Interstellar.

He’s never happppy

AGA does get a bit carried away with his angst at times.

I mean, over twenty paragraphs for a review of just two
episodes! Even the journalist writing the review in The
Guardian was more concise!!! ;-)

It's only 10 paragraphs per episode.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for." --William Shatner
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

The True loon lashed out:

On 08/12/2025 21:05, Blueshirt wrote:

Aggy should be aware of how stories work. He is our resident
professor of literature

I'm aware that neither Davies or McTighe can't writer them.

Neither can’t you writer simple sentences.
--
solar penguin
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <xn0peav98az2iu000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

The Doctor wrote:

In article <xn0pealtn2mt6qg004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

I hate your ultra-long reviews, can you not just say
it's utter garbage in five paragraphs instead of twenty?

You prefer my stuff?

Steady on old chap... I never said THAT!!!

You have an adversoty to the long reviews.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <xn0peavn7be3cw001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

The Doctor wrote:

In article <xn0peakvl2lfvr5003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

The Doctor wrote:

How can the average on IMDB be 7/10 ?

Possibly because not everybody thinks the same as
you.

What about AGA?

I think most of us knew what he'd think of it long before
it aired!

Even Rotton Tomatoes ordinary reviews are going thumbs
down.

Good for them. They are not here though are they... so they
don't count.

YIO
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <xn0peavtlbncwa003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

solar penguin wrote:

Tovey’s character wasn’t woken up by any character but
by the loud buzzing of his top secret UNIT communicator
that he keeps hidden in his sock drawer. The he goes and
wakes his kid. Got that? Tovey is the one who wakes up the
kid, not the other way round!

Methinks the kid and the ex-wife will be playing a part in
later episodes...

Prediction noted.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <xn0peaw1nbz1m4004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

What is the purpose of having this kid there in the first
place then?

As RTD's writing is about as subtle as a sledge-hammer, I'd
say the kid will be back. He'll probably be put in danger
somehow and need rescuing by his Dad, with help from the fish
lizard with no breasts... or something.

Unlike the girl in Interstellar this stupid kid has absolutely
nothing to do with the story development or the plot.

You've only seen two episodes out of five, remember.

It's RTD... if there's a kid there, he's there for a reason.

Stay tuned.

We will.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <10h7akf$cciq$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:

Blueshirt blindsided the loon:

The True Doctor wrote:

What is the purpose of having this kid there in the first
place then?

As RTD's writing is about as subtle as a sledge-hammer, I'd
say the kid will be back. He'll probably be put in danger
somehow and need rescuing by his Dad, with help from the fish
lizard with no breasts... or something.

Unlike the girl in Interstellar this stupid kid has absolutely
nothing to do with the story development or the plot.

You've only seen two episodes out of five, remember.

It's RTD... if there's a kid there, he's there for a reason.

Stay tuned.

And if Barclay’s family weren’t introduced before they become
important in episode four or five, Aggy would be complaining that
we should’ve seen them before!

He’s never happy.

Let us see.

--
solar penguin

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <xn0peb09513cky000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

solar penguin wrote:

Blueshirt blindsided the loon:

The True Doctor wrote:

What is the purpose of having this kid there in the first
place then?

You've only seen two episodes out of five, remember.

It's RTD... if there's a kid there, he's there for a reason.

And if Barclay’s family weren’t introduced before they become
important in episode four or five, Aggy would be complaining
that we should’ve seen them before!

The fact Barclay's family were a large part of the focus in
the second episode, and not just put away somewhere for the
duration of the story, clearly means they will play a part in
the proceedings... beyond Barclay and his kid having a cuddle
on the sofa in the hotel room or them getting blown away by
rubbish! So yeah, they couldn't just be thrown in for the
episode five climax.

As always, they are there for a reason. Aggy should be aware
of how stories work. He is our resident professor of literature
after all. Plus, we all know RTD likes his soap opera moments
too. So my money is on Barclay and his missus reconciling at
the end too, making Kirby happier than a fish lizard in water.

He’s never happppy

AGA does get a bit carried away with his angst at times.

I mean, over twenty paragraphs for a review of just two
episodes! Even the journalist writing the review in The
Guardian was more concise!!! ;-)

the RTD anti-fans are vocal.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <10h7pc9$gk5b$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:

On 08/12/2025 18:23, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

What is the purpose of having this kid there in the first
place then?

As RTD's writing is about as subtle as a sledge-hammer, I'd
say the kid will be back. He'll probably be put in danger
somehow and need rescuing by his Dad, with help from the fish
lizard with no breasts... or something.

Unlike the girl in Interstellar this stupid kid has absolutely
nothing to do with the story development or the plot.

You've only seen two episodes out of five, remember.

I figured out the daughter's significance and pivotal role in the plot
and the major plot twist in the first 5 minutes of Interstellar and
still kept watching for almost 3 hours to find out if I was right.

It's RTD... if there's a kid there, he's there for a reason.

RTD and the fool McTighe don't have the remotest clue how to write.
They're talentless soap opera hacks not science fiction writers.

Stay tuned.

I don't feel like watching any of the remaining episodes. You can easily >figure out the pattern. Each week it was be yet another racist and
bigoted woke attack on the entire human race blaming them for all the
fish lizards problems, the death of their people, the pollution of their >water and their air, the theft of their gas and oil, the destruction of >their cites, the failure of their economy, the appropriation of their >culture, we are the superior beings, etc., etc., ...

These imbecilic far-left woke degenerates that date to call themselves >writers are going to write another Mein Kampf in their own image.

RTD out!

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <10h7pkl$gmd2$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:

On 08/12/2025 19:58, solar penguin wrote:

Blueshirt blindsided the loon:

The True Doctor wrote:

What is the purpose of having this kid there in the first
place then?

As RTD's writing is about as subtle as a sledge-hammer, I'd
say the kid will be back. He'll probably be put in danger
somehow and need rescuing by his Dad, with help from the fish
lizard with no breasts... or something.

Unlike the girl in Interstellar this stupid kid has absolutely
nothing to do with the story development or the plot.

You've only seen two episodes out of five, remember.

It's RTD... if there's a kid there, he's there for a reason.

Stay tuned.

And if Barclay’s family weren’t introduced before they become
important in episode four or five, Aggy would be complaining that
we should’ve seen them before!

He’s never happy.

They've not even been introduced properly to begin with. They're their
as irrelevant, mind numbing, soap opera padding to fill 5 epsiodes
because Davies and McTighe don't have the remotest clue how to write
science fiction or how to the create and develop intelligent characters
and plot based characterisation.

As I said, RTD tries to merge Green Death and the Sea Devils only to get
The Pyramid at the End of the World.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <10h7qju$gt37$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:

On 08/12/2025 21:05, Blueshirt wrote:

solar penguin wrote:

Blueshirt blindsided the loon:

The True Doctor wrote:

What is the purpose of having this kid there in the first
place then?

You've only seen two episodes out of five, remember.

It's RTD... if there's a kid there, he's there for a reason.

And if Barclay’s family weren’t introduced before they become
important in episode four or five, Aggy would be complaining
that we should’ve seen them before!

The fact Barclay's family were a large part of the focus in
the second episode, and not just put away somewhere for the
duration of the story, clearly means they will play a part in
the proceedings... beyond Barclay and his kid having a cuddle

No it doesn't. It clearly show that Davies and McTighe are totally shit >writers who don't understand character, characterisation, or character >dependent plot development. Interstellar shows you how to do it properly.

on the sofa in the hotel room or them getting blown away by
rubbish! So yeah, they couldn't just be thrown in for the
episode five climax.

As always, they are there for a reason. Aggy should be aware

Not with how Davies writes. Look at the crap he wrote for Gatwa's final >episode and the totally bullshit surrounding Ruby Sunday who turned out
to mean nothing.

of how stories work. He is our resident professor of literature

I'm aware that neither Davies or McTighe can't writer them. All their >interested is attacking and lecturing their audience with degenerate far >left political messages and false narratives.

after all. Plus, we all know RTD likes his soap opera moments
too. So my money is on Barclay and his missus reconciling at
the end too, making Kirby happier than a fish lizard in water.

I don't give a f*k about Tovey, his ex, or his repulsive obese
son/daughter. I always cared about Matthew McConaughey's character and
that of his daughter and her brother from the first 5 minutes of >Interstellar.

He’s never happppy

AGA does get a bit carried away with his angst at times.

I mean, over twenty paragraphs for a review of just two
episodes! Even the journalist writing the review in The
Guardian was more concise!!! ;-)

It's only 10 paragraphs per episode.

So 20 paragraphs.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <10h8a3u$jv0h$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:

The True loon lashed out:

On 08/12/2025 21:05, Blueshirt wrote:

Aggy should be aware of how stories work. He is our resident
professor of literature

I'm aware that neither Davies or McTighe can't writer them.

Neither can’t you writer simple sentences.

Nitpick.

--
solar penguin

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

On 09/12/2025 04:55, solar imbecile wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

On 08/12/2025 21:05, Blueshirt wrote:

Aggy should be aware of how stories work. He is our resident
professor of literature

I'm aware that neither Davies or McTighe can't writer them.

I'm aware that neither Davies or McTighe can write them.

Neither can’t you writer simple sentences.

The spell checker changed the words I intended to write.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for." --William Shatner
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

On 9/12/2025 5:09 am, Blueshirt wrote:

The Doctor wrote:

In article <xn0peakvl2lfvr5003@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

The Doctor wrote:

How can the average on IMDB be 7/10 ?

Possibly because not everybody thinks the same as you.

What about AGA?

I think most of us knew what he'd think of it long before it aired!

Even Rotton Tomatoes ordinary reviews are going thumbs down.

Good for them. They are not here though are they... so they don't
count.

Correct!!
--
Daniel70
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

On 9/12/2025 4:22 pm, The True Doctor wrote:

On 09/12/2025 04:55, solar imbecile wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

On 08/12/2025 21:05, Blueshirt wrote:

Aggy should be aware of how stories work. He is our resident
professor of literature

I'm aware that neither Davies or McTighe can't writer them.

I'm aware that neither Davies or McTighe can write them.

Neither can’t you writer simple sentences.

The spell checker changed the words I intended to write.

Ah!! AI!! Can we blame them for all our mistakes??
--
Daniel70
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

The True Doctor wrote:

On 08/12/2025 21:05, Blueshirt wrote:

Plus, we all know RTD likes his soap opera moments too.
So my money is on Barclay and his missus reconciling at
the end too, making Kirby happier than a fish lizard in
water.

I don't give a fuck about Tovey, his ex, or his repulsive
obese son/daughter.

I originally went with son, then thought daughter, then I
went with Kirby to stay on the safe side.

I wouldn't want to be accused of being politically incorrect
now would I?

I wouldn't have said obese though... just fat.

I always cared about Matthew McConaughey's character and
that of his daughter and her brother from the first 5 minutes
of Interstellar.

Can't say I cared much about either of them to be honest. It was
just a film to watch... a good one mind you.

AGA does get a bit carried away with his angst at times.

I mean, over twenty paragraphs for a review of just two
episodes!

It's only 10 paragraphs per episode.

That's still a bit much just to say it's "woke garbage"...

Why use two thousand words when two will do?! ;-)

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

The True Doctor wrote:

On 08/12/2025 21:05, Blueshirt wrote:

As always, they are there for a reason.

Not with how Davies writes. Look at the crap he wrote
for Gatwa's final episode and the totally bullshit
surrounding Ruby Sunday who turned out to mean nothing.

Not just Ruby Sunday...

Her mum... Belinda Chandra... the Rani's... Sutekh... Susan...
RTD has wrote a ton of stuff that's led nowhere and has been
a waste of the viewer's time because the plots were not
developed.

So yeah, you're right.

Still, it's a pretty safe bet that Barclay's kid is going to
find himself/herself in jeopardy at some stage during the
proceedings, as there's three more episodes to go. RTD does
likes his OTT soap opera emotional drama.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

The Doctor wrote:

In article <xn0peav98az2iu000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

The Doctor wrote:

In article <xn0pealtn2mt6qg004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

I hate your ultra-long reviews, can you not just
say it's utter garbage in five paragraphs instead
of twenty?

You prefer my stuff?

Steady on old chap... I never said THAT!!!

You have an adversity to the long reviews.

I prefer long reviews that I can read and understand to
incomprehensible gobbledygook though!
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

On 9/12/2025 11:09 am, The True Doctor wrote:

On 08/12/2025 18:23, Blueshirt wrote:

<Snip>

It's RTD... if there's a kid there, he's there for a reason.

RTD and the fool McTighe don't have the remotest clue how to write.
They're talentless soap opera hacks not science fiction writers.

Stay tuned.

I don't feel like watching any of the remaining episodes.

WHAT?? But, Aggy, you always type that you'd watch the shows so that WE
don't have to!!

What will we do now?? I've got Binky Kill-Filed .... so, Blueshirt, it
looks like it's all up to you to keep US informed!! ;-P

You can easily figure out the pattern. Each week it was *be* yet
another racist and bigoted woke attack on the entire human race
blaming them for all the fish lizards problems, the death of their
people, the pollution of their water and their air, the theft of
their gas and oil, the destruction of their *cites*, the failure of
their economy, the appropriation of their culture, we are the
superior beings, etc., etc., ...

These imbecilic far-left woke degenerates that *date* to call
themselves writers are going to write another Mein Kampf in their own
image.

Are the words I've highlighted spelling mistakes, Aggy?? Bloody A.I.!!
--
Daniel70
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

Blueshirt seemed bamboozled:

By mentioning the Doctor I keep coming back to the issue that
if all those Sea Devils rose up in cities all around the world,
as depicted... would the Doctor really just ignore them and not
get involved? Ncuti's Doctor might have gone [somewhere], but
there's still a Doctor relaxing in London.

Here’s one fan’s answer:
https://youtu.be/R-IiSeyU95c
--
solar penguin
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <xn0pebxyr1a985o002@post.eweka.nl>,
blueshirt@indigo.news says...

The Doctor wrote:

In article <xn0peav98az2iu000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

The Doctor wrote:

In article <xn0pealtn2mt6qg004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

I hate your ultra-long reviews, can you not just
say it's utter garbage in five paragraphs instead
of twenty?

You prefer my stuff?

Steady on old chap... I never said THAT!!!

You have an adversity to the long reviews.

I prefer long reviews that I can read and understand to
incomprehensible gobbledygook though!

I'd rather read a real person's thoughts than Gemini's
harvested take.


Melissa
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

solar penguin wrote:

Blueshirt seemed bamboozled:

By mentioning the Doctor I keep coming back to the issue
that if all those Sea Devils rose up in cities all around
the world, as depicted... would the Doctor really just
ignore them and not get involved? Ncuti's Doctor might have
gone [somewhere], but there's still a Doctor relaxing in
London.

Here’s one fan’s answer:
https://youtu.be/R-IiSeyU95c

Exactly! :-)
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

Daniel70 wrote:

On 9/12/2025 11:09 am, The True Doctor wrote:

I don't feel like watching any of the remaining episodes.

WHAT?? But, Aggy, you always type that you'd watch the shows
so that WE don't have to!!

What will we do now?? I've got Binky Kill-Filed .... so,
Blueshirt, it looks like it's all up to you to keep US
informed!!

I'm pretty sure Agamemnon will be back next weekend with his
thoughts on episode's three and four...

He can review them so I don't have to!

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <10h8r5m$nr4s$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

On 9/12/2025 5:09 am, Blueshirt wrote:

The Doctor wrote:

In article <xn0peakvl2lfvr5003@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

The Doctor wrote:

How can the average on IMDB be 7/10 ?

Possibly because not everybody thinks the same as you.

What about AGA?

I think most of us knew what he'd think of it long before it aired!

Even Rotton Tomatoes ordinary reviews are going thumbs down.

Good for them. They are not here though are they... so they don't
count.

Correct!!

IYIO.

--
Daniel70

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <10h8t6i$od3o$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

On 9/12/2025 4:22 pm, The True Doctor wrote:

On 09/12/2025 04:55, solar imbecile wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

On 08/12/2025 21:05, Blueshirt wrote:

Aggy should be aware of how stories work. He is our resident
professor of literature

I'm aware that neither Davies or McTighe can't writer them.

I'm aware that neither Davies or McTighe can write them.

Neither can’t you writer simple sentences.

The spell checker changed the words I intended to write.

Ah!! AI!! Can we blame them for all our mistakes??

You do.

--
Daniel70

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <xn0pebxbn19gxgi000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

On 08/12/2025 21:05, Blueshirt wrote:

Plus, we all know RTD likes his soap opera moments too.
So my money is on Barclay and his missus reconciling at
the end too, making Kirby happier than a fish lizard in
water.

I don't give a fuck about Tovey, his ex, or his repulsive
obese son/daughter.

I originally went with son, then thought daughter, then I
went with Kirby to stay on the safe side.

I wouldn't want to be accused of being politically incorrect
now would I?

I wouldn't have said obese though... just fat.

I always cared about Matthew McConaughey's character and
that of his daughter and her brother from the first 5 minutes
of Interstellar.

Can't say I cared much about either of them to be honest. It was
just a film to watch... a good one mind you.

AGA does get a bit carried away with his angst at times.

I mean, over twenty paragraphs for a review of just two
episodes!

It's only 10 paragraphs per episode.

That's still a bit much just to say it's "woke garbage"...

Why use two thousand words when two will do?! ;-)

Who are you? Me?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <xn0pebxxh1a7d05001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

On 08/12/2025 21:05, Blueshirt wrote:

As always, they are there for a reason.

Not with how Davies writes. Look at the crap he wrote
for Gatwa's final episode and the totally bulls*t
surrounding Ruby Sunday who turned out to mean nothing.

Not just Ruby Sunday...

Her mum... Belinda Chandra... the Rani's... Sutekh... Susan...
RTD has wrote a ton of stuff that's led nowhere and has been
a waste of the viewer's time because the plots were not
developed.

So yeah, you're right.

Still, it's a pretty safe bet that Barclay's kid is going to
find himself/herself in jeopardy at some stage during the
proceedings, as there's three more episodes to go. RTD does
likes his OTT soap opera emotional drama.

We shall see.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <xn0pebxyr1a985o002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

The Doctor wrote:

In article <xn0peav98az2iu000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

The Doctor wrote:

In article <xn0pealtn2mt6qg004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

I hate your ultra-long reviews, can you not just
say it's utter garbage in five paragraphs instead
of twenty?

You prefer my stuff?

Steady on old chap... I never said THAT!!!

You have an adversity to the long reviews.

I prefer long reviews that I can read and understand to
incomprehensible gobbledygook though!

As you view it.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <10h8tse$oip5$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

On 9/12/2025 11:09 am, The True Doctor wrote:

On 08/12/2025 18:23, Blueshirt wrote:

<Snip>

It's RTD... if there's a kid there, he's there for a reason.

RTD and the fool McTighe don't have the remotest clue how to write.
They're talentless soap opera hacks not science fiction writers.

Stay tuned.

I don't feel like watching any of the remaining episodes.

WHAT?? But, Aggy, you always type that you'd watch the shows so that WE
don't have to!!

What will we do now?? I've got Binky Kill-Filed .... so, Blueshirt, it

^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted

looks like it's all up to you to keep US informed!! ;-P

You can easily figure out the pattern. Each week it was *be* yet
another racist and bigoted woke attack on the entire human race
blaming them for all the fish lizards problems, the death of their
people, the pollution of their water and their air, the theft of
their gas and oil, the destruction of their *cites*, the failure of
their economy, the appropriation of their culture, we are the
superior beings, etc., etc., ...

These imbecilic far-left woke degenerates that *date* to call
themselves writers are going to write another Mein Kampf in their own
image.

Are the words I've highlighted spelling mistakes, Aggy?? Bloody A.I.!!
--
Daniel70

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <10h90np$pbta$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:

Blueshirt seemed bamboozled:

By mentioning the Doctor I keep coming back to the issue that
if all those Sea Devils rose up in cities all around the world,
as depicted... would the Doctor really just ignore them and not
get involved? Ncuti's Doctor might have gone [somewhere], but
there's still a Doctor relaxing in London.

Here’s one fan’s answer:
https://youtu.be/R-IiSeyU95c

Get a transcript.

--
solar penguin

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <MPG.43a1e204cab71411989787@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:

In article <xn0pebxyr1a985o002@post.eweka.nl>,
blueshirt@indigo.news says...

The Doctor wrote:

In article <xn0peav98az2iu000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

The Doctor wrote:

In article <xn0pealtn2mt6qg004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

I hate your ultra-long reviews, can you not just
say it's utter garbage in five paragraphs instead
of twenty?

You prefer my stuff?

Steady on old chap... I never said THAT!!!

You have an adversity to the long reviews.

I prefer long reviews that I can read and understand to
incomprehensible gobbledygook though!

I'd rather read a real person's thoughts than Gemini's
harvested take.

I just do that for the Trekkies now.

Melissa

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <xn0pec1j61f4pac000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

solar penguin wrote:

Blueshirt seemed bamboozled:

By mentioning the Doctor I keep coming back to the issue
that if all those Sea Devils rose up in cities all around
the world, as depicted... would the Doctor really just
ignore them and not get involved? Ncuti's Doctor might have
gone [somewhere], but there's still a Doctor relaxing in
London.

Here’s one fan’s answer:
https://youtu.be/R-IiSeyU95c

Exactly! :-)

There you go.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <xn0pec1ms1f9wj8001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

Daniel70 wrote:

On 9/12/2025 11:09 am, The True Doctor wrote:

I don't feel like watching any of the remaining episodes.

WHAT?? But, Aggy, you always type that you'd watch the shows
so that WE don't have to!!

What will we do now?? I've got Binky Kill-Filed .... so,
Blueshirt, it looks like it's all up to you to keep US
informed!!

I'm pretty sure Agamemnon will be back next weekend with his
thoughts on episode's three and four...

He can review them so I don't have to!

You would pull that card.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <MPG.43a1e204cab71411989787@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:

In article <xn0pebxyr1a985o002@post.eweka.nl>,
blueshirt@indigo.news says...

The Doctor wrote:

In article <xn0peav98az2iu000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

The Doctor wrote:

In article <xn0pealtn2mt6qg004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

I hate your ultra-long reviews, can you not just
say it's utter garbage in five paragraphs instead
of twenty?

You prefer my stuff?

Steady on old chap... I never said THAT!!!

You have an adversity to the long reviews.

I prefer long reviews that I can read and understand to
incomprehensible gobbledygook though!

I'd rather read a real person's thoughts than Gemini's
harvested take.

Melissa

And now, after a multi-failure authentication incident yesterday, we get


AI/LLM assessment of the audience impressions
of the War between the land and the sea ?

Google GEmini

The War Between the Land and the Sea: Audience and Critical Impressions

The miniseries, a Doctor Who spin-off focusing on the alien Sea Devils (renamed Homo Aqua/Amphibia) and the UNIT task force, has received
a mixed-to-positive reception from critics and generally favourable
reactions from viewers.

Critical Reception (Mixed)

Critics generally praised the structure and performances but were divided
on the execution and subtlety of the central theme.

Publication

Rating/Verdict

Key Observations

Radio Times

4/5 Stars

Praised the sharp writing compared to recent Doctor Who and the strong character development of the protagonist, Barclay (Russell Tovey).
Found it emotive and funny.

The Guardian

3/5 Stars

Found the show entertaining but criticized the "zero subtlety"
in its messaging and felt it was a "wasted opportunity" to make
genuinely great television, also noting a "dubious approach to female roles."

The Independent

2/5 Stars

Described the series as "bland without the Time Lord,"
suggesting the spin-off does not stand strongly enough on its own.

The i Paper

Positive

Called it "the most grounded, mature storytelling that Doctor Who
has seen in years," appreciating its divergence from standard Who finales.

Audience/Viewer Impressions (Generally Positive)

Social media and viewer commentary, particularly in the UK where the show premiered, indicate a strong initial engagement:

Hooked and Gripped: Many viewers reported being "hooked" and described
the drama as "gripping" after the two-episode premiere.

Comparison to Torchwood: A significant number of fans compared the tone
and themes favorably to the earlier, darker Doctor Who spin-off, Torchwood, especially the acclaimed miniseries Children of Earth. There is a clear appetite for the more serious, grounded nature of this story.

Performance: Russell Tovey's performance as the "everyman" ambassador
Barclay was widely praised and is cited as a major strength that grounds
the fantastical conflict.

Theme and Message: The show's intense focus on the climate crisis
and humanity's mistreatment of the oceans was highly noticeable.
While some viewers appreciated the urgent, "on the nose" ecological commentary, others found it heavy-handed or "didactic."

Ratings Success: Initial overnight figures suggested the show was
one of the biggest new drama launches of the year for the BBC,
indicating strong viewer turnout.

(The other day , GooGem was catatonic for a response
)

ChatGPT

Here’s a summary of **audience impressions** (and early public reception)
of The War Between the Land and the Sea — based on what appears on its
IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes pages, plus viewer-reaction articles
and fan-forum commentary.

## What many viewers like

* On IMDb the show has a user rating of ~ **7.3/10**. ([IMDb][1])
* Some viewers say it "started off way better than expected" - praising
its characters, "heart," and initial episodes. ([IMDb][2])
* A number of fans appreciate the acting and tone: for example,
one review calls the first two episodes "good story and good special FX"
and says the show has "its own vibe." ([IMDb][2])
* Some on social media and viewer-reaction articles report being "hooked," calling the series “gripping,” even among people who aren't hardcore sci-fi fans. ([HELLO!][3])
* Several enjoy the more mature, serious spin on the Doctor Who
universe - seeing it as a "bold, atmospheric spin-off" with moral stakes, rather than a lighter or purely adventurous tone. ([IMDb][1])

So — for a section of the audience: good performances, decent visuals,
a mature tone, and a premise that feels fresh compared with recent
Whoniverse output.

## What critics and some viewers dislike (or find lacking)

* On Rotten Tomatoes the "Audience" (Popcorn) score is weak - the page
shows **Fewer than 50 ratings**, and the visible “Audience Reviews” include complaints. ([Rotten Tomatoes][4])
* Several IMDb users report disappointment: complaints include "lack
of subtlety," heavy-handed messaging, uneven tone, and a storyline
that "gets lost" despite some nice visuals. ([IMDb][2])
* Some found the pacing slow or the drama unconvincing:
for instance one user wrote the show "felt like a bad Doctor Who episode", criticised the dialogue
and said they "turned off after 15 minutes." ([IMDb][2])
* Others criticised the "politically charged scenes with a box-ticking agenda," suggesting the show is too overt or preachy with its themes
rather than letting the story speak for itself. ([Rotten Tomatoes][4])
* A few viewers seem especially dissatisfied - labeling the direction,
acting or writing as "atrocious," "horrible," or "bad" in reviews. ([IMDb][2])

In short: for some the ambition and subject matter don't pay off - it's viewed as uneven, heavy-handed, or even boring.

## General Tone of Reception So Far — Mixed & Polarising

By combining the positive and negative feedback:

* The response is **quite mixed**, with **polarised opinions**: some fans feel it's a refreshing new direction for the Whoniverse and enjoy the drama; others feel let down, especially if they were expecting something subtler or more
in line with classic sci-fi.

* There seems to be a **split along expectations**: people who come with
low expectations (or are more open to the environmental / political tone)
tend to enjoy it; those hoping for a "classic" or more neutral sci-fi/alien-invasion show often find it disappointing or unbalanced.
* Early enthusiasm exists among parts of the audience - but many
are skeptical, reserved, or actively critical, especially
after the first couple of episodes.

## ‍What Fans on Forums Are Saying

On a fan forum thread discussing the show:

"I went in with no expectations and I enjoyed both episodes." ([Reddit][5]) “It was actually refreshing for the humans to be dealing with the issue,

rather than relying on the Doctor…" ([Reddit][5])

But some are more cautious:

"It's fairly ham-fisted politically… some of the lines felt like classic

RTD-isms… not in the best way." ([Reddit][5])

So among dedicated fans there's a guarded optimism mixed with criticism about tone, political messaging, and execution.

---

## 🧩 My Take: Why the Mixed Reception?

I think the mixed audience impressions stem from these factors:

* The show tries to blend **sci-fi, political allegory, environmental messaging, and the Whoniverse legacy** - that's ambitious, but it risks alienating viewers who prefer escapist sci-fi.
* It seems to **choose a heavier tone** (less whimsical/fantastical,
more moral/political) — that works for some, but comes off as preachy
or clunky for others.
* As with many spin-offs or reboots, **expectations differ widely**:
some value the new direction; others want something more traditional.
* Finally, because the show is new and not all episodes out yet,
early reactions may still evolve - first impressions matter a lot,
but things could improve (or worsen) depending on where the narrative goes.

---

If you like - I can pull up **a breakdown of how different fan-communities (casual viewers, longtime Doctor Who fans, critics)** are reacting to
the show so far - that tends to show some interesting divides in perception.

* [ft.com](https://www.ft.com/content/8997a224-aec9-479d-b245-2c466a430d04 ?utm_source=chatgpt.com)
* [theguardian.com](https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2025/dec/07/ the-war-between-the-land-and-the-sea-review-prepare-to-roll-your-eyes -a-lot-at-this-fishy-doctor-who-spinoff?utm_source=chatgpt.com)
* [thetimes.com](https://www.thetimes.com/culture/tv-radio/article /the-war-between-the-land-and-the-sea-review-hhckkm9kq?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

[1]: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt30645193/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
"The War Between the Land and the Sea (TV Series - ) - IMDb"
[2]: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt30645193/reviews/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "The War Between the Land and the Sea (TV Series 2025- ) - User reviews - IMDb" [3]: https://www.hellomagazine.com/film/871622 /viewers-hooked-brilliant-5-part-drama-war-between-land-and-sea /?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Viewers 'hooked' on brilliant 5-part
BBC drama The War Between the Land and the Sea after long-awaited release
| HELLO!"
[4]: https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/the_war_between_the_land_and_the_sea /s01 "The War Between the Land and the Sea: Season 1 | Rotten Tomatoes"
[5]: https://www.reddit.com//r/gallifrey/comments/1ph6aka /the_war_between_the_land_and_the_sea_review/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
"The War Between the Land and the Sea review - prepare to roll your eyes
a lot at this fishy Doctor Who spinoff | Television | The Guardian"
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

On 09/12/2025 10:25, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

On 08/12/2025 21:05, Blueshirt wrote:

Plus, we all know RTD likes his soap opera moments too.
So my money is on Barclay and his missus reconciling at
the end too, making Kirby happier than a fish lizard in
water.

I don't give a fuck about Tovey, his ex, or his repulsive
obese son/daughter.

I originally went with son, then thought daughter, then I

As did I. No, actually first I went with gay lover, then son, but only
after Tovey took him to his mother and then when I saw her I thought
they were lesbians, then he was his son, after I dismissed menage a
trois and then his daughter, but only in episode two.

went with Kirby to stay on the safe side.

Not only couldn't them make him look like his father these degenerate
woke morons couldn't even give him a name that denoted his gender.
Fucking imbecilic bigots. Instead of putting the audience first and
making it clear what they relationships were by choosing an actor that
looked female and who looked like her father, they chose a repulsive
looking obese actor with no resemblance whatsoever to Tovey and almost
as tall as he was.

I wouldn't want to be accused of being politically incorrect
now would I?

How the fuck is the audience supposed to figure things out and accept
these people when the fucking woke imbeciles making this show always put
their disguising, degenerate, sexist, racist agenda above everything and
tell the audience screw you?

I wouldn't have said obese though... just fat.

Nope. Calling him/her fat is an insult to fat people. This person was
obese, especially for a girl.

I always cared about Matthew McConaughey's character and
that of his daughter and her brother from the first 5 minutes
of Interstellar.

Can't say I cared much about either of them to be honest. It was
just a film to watch... a good one mind you.

Did you actually understand the film? Everything in it was totally
dependent on the relationship between the father and his daughter.

AGA does get a bit carried away with his angst at times.

I mean, over twenty paragraphs for a review of just two
episodes!

It's only 10 paragraphs per episode.

That's still a bit much just to say it's "woke garbage"...

I need to explain why or I will fail.

Why use two thousand words when two will do?! ;-)

I say three. Fucking woke crap!
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for." --William Shatner
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

On 09/12/2025 10:25, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

On 08/12/2025 21:05, Blueshirt wrote:

As always, they are there for a reason.

Not with how Davies writes. Look at the crap he wrote
for Gatwa's final episode and the totally bullshit
surrounding Ruby Sunday who turned out to mean nothing.

Not just Ruby Sunday...

Her mum... Belinda Chandra... the Rani's... Sutekh... Susan...
RTD has wrote a ton of stuff that's led nowhere and has been
a waste of the viewer's time because the plots were not
developed.

Because it was never about the plot or the characters. It was only about inserting the far left political agenda and attacking the audience into submission. Everything else was window dressing which was quickly thrown together and never thought out properly.

So yeah, you're right.

Still, it's a pretty safe bet that Barclay's kid is going to
find himself/herself in jeopardy at some stage during the
proceedings, as there's three more episodes to go. RTD does
likes his OTT soap opera emotional drama.

It's not emotional when you don't give a fuck about any of the
characters because they either look repulsive, are played by effeminate
gay actors who can't play heterosexual characters and make them look
week and incompetent, don't represent the majority of the population or
people watching, are not characterised very well or at all, and have no sympathetic qualities or character development whatsoever to endear them
to you.

These fucking woke morons that try to be writers don't give a fuck about
the audience, the principles of good writing, or how to present credible relationships and character interactions. All they care about is their
sick political agenda and their disgusting hypocritical virtue signalling.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for." --William Shatner
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

On 09/12/2025 12:42, Blueshirt wrote:

Daniel70 wrote:

On 9/12/2025 11:09 am, The True Doctor wrote:

I don't feel like watching any of the remaining episodes.

WHAT?? But, Aggy, you always type that you'd watch the shows
so that WE don't have to!!

What will we do now?? I've got Binky Kill-Filed .... so,
Blueshirt, it looks like it's all up to you to keep US
informed!!

I'm pretty sure Agamemnon will be back next weekend with his
thoughts on episode's three and four...

Don't tell me they're so desperate to get this degenerate shit over with they're showing another 2 episodes back to back?

He can review them so I don't have to!

But I have to torture myself and watch them first.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for." --William Shatner
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <10h9vfs$12hpc$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:

On 09/12/2025 10:25, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

On 08/12/2025 21:05, Blueshirt wrote:

Plus, we all know RTD likes his soap opera moments too.
So my money is on Barclay and his missus reconciling at
the end too, making Kirby happier than a fish lizard in
water.

I don't give a fuck about Tovey, his ex, or his repulsive
obese son/daughter.

I originally went with son, then thought daughter, then I

As did I. No, actually first I went with gay lover, then son, but only
after Tovey took him to his mother and then when I saw her I thought
they were lesbians, then he was his son, after I dismissed menage a
trois and then his daughter, but only in episode two.

went with Kirby to stay on the safe side.

Not only couldn't them make him look like his father these degenerate
woke morons couldn't even give him a name that denoted his gender.
Fucking imbecilic bigots. Instead of putting the audience first and
making it clear what they relationships were by choosing an actor that >looked female and who looked like her father, they chose a repulsive
looking obese actor with no resemblance whatsoever to Tovey and almost
as tall as he was.

I wouldn't want to be accused of being politically incorrect
now would I?

How the fuck is the audience supposed to figure things out and accept
these people when the fucking woke imbeciles making this show always put >their disguising, degenerate, sexist, racist agenda above everything and >tell the audience screw you?

I wouldn't have said obese though... just fat.

Nope. Calling him/her fat is an insult to fat people. This person was
obese, especially for a girl.

I always cared about Matthew McConaughey's character and
that of his daughter and her brother from the first 5 minutes
of Interstellar.

Can't say I cared much about either of them to be honest. It was
just a film to watch... a good one mind you.

Did you actually understand the film? Everything in it was totally
dependent on the relationship between the father and his daughter.

AGA does get a bit carried away with his angst at times.

I mean, over twenty paragraphs for a review of just two
episodes!

It's only 10 paragraphs per episode.

That's still a bit much just to say it's "woke garbage"...

I need to explain why or I will fail.

Why use two thousand words when two will do?! ;-)

I say three. F*ing woke crap!

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <10ha03t$12nr7$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:

On 09/12/2025 10:25, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

On 08/12/2025 21:05, Blueshirt wrote:

As always, they are there for a reason.

Not with how Davies writes. Look at the crap he wrote
for Gatwa's final episode and the totally bullshit
surrounding Ruby Sunday who turned out to mean nothing.

Not just Ruby Sunday...

Her mum... Belinda Chandra... the Rani's... Sutekh... Susan...
RTD has wrote a ton of stuff that's led nowhere and has been
a waste of the viewer's time because the plots were not
developed.

Because it was never about the plot or the characters. It was only about >inserting the far left political agenda and attacking the audience into >submission. Everything else was window dressing which was quickly thrown >together and never thought out properly.

So yeah, you're right.

Still, it's a pretty safe bet that Barclay's kid is going to
find himself/herself in jeopardy at some stage during the
proceedings, as there's three more episodes to go. RTD does
likes his OTT soap opera emotional drama.

It's not emotional when you don't give a f*k about any of the
characters because they either look repulsive, are played by effeminate
gay actors who can't play heterosexual characters and make them look
week and incompetent, don't represent the majority of the population or >people watching, are not characterised very well or at all, and have no >sympathetic qualities or character development whatsoever to endear them
to you.

These woke morons that try to be writers don't give a f*k about
the audience, the principles of good writing, or how to present credible >relationships and character interactions. All they care about is their
sick political agenda and their disgusting hypocritical virtue signalling.

RTD go now!

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <10ha0am$12nr7$3@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:

On 09/12/2025 12:42, Blueshirt wrote:

Daniel70 wrote:

On 9/12/2025 11:09 am, The True Doctor wrote:

I don't feel like watching any of the remaining episodes.

WHAT?? But, Aggy, you always type that you'd watch the shows
so that WE don't have to!!

What will we do now?? I've got Binky Kill-Filed .... so,
Blueshirt, it looks like it's all up to you to keep US
informed!!

I'm pretty sure Agamemnon will be back next weekend with his
thoughts on episode's three and four...

Don't tell me they're so desperate to get this degenerate shit over with >they're showing another 2 episodes back to back?

He can review them so I don't have to!

But I have to torture myself and watch them first.

RTD is a has been.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

On 9/12/2025 10:21 pm, solar penguin wrote:

Blueshirt seemed bamboozled:

By mentioning the Doctor I keep coming back to the issue that
if all those Sea Devils rose up in cities all around the world,
as depicted... would the Doctor really just ignore them and not
get involved? Ncuti's Doctor might have gone [somewhere], but
there's still a Doctor relaxing in London.

Here’s one fan’s answer:
https://youtu.be/R-IiSeyU95c

WHAT IS UP WITH HIS HAIR??

(Yes, I know.)
--
Daniel70
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <10hbmbs$1fg68$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

On 9/12/2025 10:21 pm, solar penguin wrote:

Blueshirt seemed bamboozled:

By mentioning the Doctor I keep coming back to the issue that
if all those Sea Devils rose up in cities all around the world,
as depicted... would the Doctor really just ignore them and not
get involved? Ncuti's Doctor might have gone [somewhere], but
there's still a Doctor relaxing in London.

Here’s one fan’s answer:
https://youtu.be/R-IiSeyU95c

WHAT IS UP WITH HIS HAIR??

(Yes, I know.)

Quite stabbing for you?

--
Daniel70

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

The True Doctor wrote:

On 09/12/2025 10:25, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

I always cared about Matthew McConaughey's character and
that of his daughter and her brother from the first 5
minutes of Interstellar.

Can't say I cared much about either of them to be honest. It
was just a film to watch... a good one mind you.

Did you actually understand the film? Everything in it was
totally dependent on the relationship between the father and
his daughter.

I don't watch movies at the cinema to be intellectually
stimulated, I go for the entertainment... and the popcorn with a
bag of Maltesers thrown in to the box. "Interstellar" was a good
sci-fi movie with a good cast, it looked great too... but I
can't see how it relates in any way to "The War Between the Land
and the Sea" mini-series. They are chalk and cheese. Quality
wise, cast wise, acting wise... in fact, in everything!

It's only 10 paragraphs per episode.

That's still a bit much just to say it's "woke garbage"...

I need to explain why or I will fail.

I think we all know what you mean!

In fact, I'm pretty sure we know what you mean before you even
say it!

Why use two thousand words when two will do?! ;-)

I say three. Fucking woke crap!

No need to be excessive!
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

The True Doctor wrote:

On 09/12/2025 12:42, Blueshirt wrote:

I'm pretty sure Agamemnon will be back next weekend with
his thoughts on episode's three and four...

Don't tell me they're so desperate to get this degenerate
shit over with they're showing another 2 episodes back to
back?

Yes, they are.

With the one episode finale on the 21st.

He can review them so I don't have to!

But I have to torture myself and watch them first.

I'm sure you will manage. Agamemnon was a legendary hero
remember? It's in your blood!
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <xn0pedj3s2i3ghp000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

On 09/12/2025 10:25, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

I always cared about Matthew McConaughey's character and
that of his daughter and her brother from the first 5
minutes of Interstellar.

Can't say I cared much about either of them to be honest. It
was just a film to watch... a good one mind you.

Did you actually understand the film? Everything in it was
totally dependent on the relationship between the father and
his daughter.

I don't watch movies at the cinema to be intellectually
stimulated, I go for the entertainment... and the popcorn with a
bag of Maltesers thrown in to the box. "Interstellar" was a good
sci-fi movie with a good cast, it looked great too... but I
can't see how it relates in any way to "The War Between the Land
and the Sea" mini-series. They are chalk and cheese. Quality
wise, cast wise, acting wise... in fact, in everything!

It's only 10 paragraphs per episode.

That's still a bit much just to say it's "woke garbage"...

I need to explain why or I will fail.

I think we all know what you mean!

In fact, I'm pretty sure we know what you mean before you even
say it!

Why use two thousand words when two will do?! ;-)

I say three. F*ing woke crap!

No need to be excessive!

Stoking flames BS?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <xn0pedj9l2ibt2g001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

On 09/12/2025 12:42, Blueshirt wrote:

I'm pretty sure Agamemnon will be back next weekend with
his thoughts on episode's three and four...

Don't tell me they're so desperate to get this degenerate
shit over with they're showing another 2 episodes back to
back?

Yes, they are.

With the one episode finale on the 21st.

He can review them so I don't have to!

But I have to torture myself and watch them first.

I'm sure you will manage. Agamemnon was a legendary hero
remember? It's in your blood!

AGA for you.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

On 10/12/2025 14:32, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

On 09/12/2025 10:25, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

I always cared about Matthew McConaughey's character and
that of his daughter and her brother from the first 5
minutes of Interstellar.

Can't say I cared much about either of them to be honest. It
was just a film to watch... a good one mind you.

Did you actually understand the film? Everything in it was
totally dependent on the relationship between the father and
his daughter.

I don't watch movies at the cinema to be intellectually
stimulated, I go for the entertainment... and the popcorn with a
bag of Maltesers thrown in to the box. "Interstellar" was a good
sci-fi movie with a good cast, it looked great too... but I
can't see how it relates in any way to "The War Between the Land

I already explained that in my review.

and the Sea" mini-series. They are chalk and cheese. Quality
wise, cast wise, acting wise... in fact, in everything!

It's only 10 paragraphs per episode.

That's still a bit much just to say it's "woke garbage"...

I need to explain why or I will fail.

I think we all know what you mean!

In fact, I'm pretty sure we know what you mean before you even
say it!

Why use two thousand words when two will do?! ;-)

I say three. Fucking woke crap!

No need to be excessive!

There need to be at least two adjectives before crap to describe exactly
what kind of crap it is.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for." --William Shatner
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

On 10/12/2025 14:39, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

On 09/12/2025 12:42, Blueshirt wrote:

I'm pretty sure Agamemnon will be back next weekend with
his thoughts on episode's three and four...

Don't tell me they're so desperate to get this degenerate
shit over with they're showing another 2 episodes back to
back?

Yes, they are.

Fuck them!

With the one episode finale on the 21st.

He can review them so I don't have to!

But I have to torture myself and watch them first.

I'm sure you will manage. Agamemnon was a legendary hero
remember? It's in your blood!

I don't want to go through this torment again.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for." --William Shatner
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

The True Doctor wrote:

On 10/12/2025 14:39, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

Don't tell me they're so desperate to get this degenerate
shit over with they're showing another 2 episodes back to
back?

Yes, they are.

Fuck them!

Clearly the BBC didn't want it running into their Christmas
schedules...

So now it'll be done and dusted on the 21st...

But I have to torture myself and watch them first.

I'm sure you will manage. Agamemnon was a legendary
hero remember? It's in your blood!

I don't want to go through this torment again.

It wasn't THAT bad!!!

My primary thoughts on it [TWBTLATS] are that in places it's
better written than the last season of Doctor Who... but with
only two episodes seen, my opinion could change... in either
direction.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

The True Doctor wrote:

On 10/12/2025 14:32, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

Did you actually understand the film? Everything in it was
totally dependent on the relationship between the father
and his daughter.

I don't watch movies at the cinema to be intellectually
stimulated, I go for the entertainment... and the popcorn
with a bag of Maltesers thrown in to the box. "Interstellar"
was a good sci-fi movie with a good cast, it looked great
too... but I can't see how it relates in any way to "The War
Between the Land

I already explained that in my review.

I read it, but there's plenty of films and TV shows that deal
with Father/Daughter relationships... Interstellar wouldn't be
top of my list for that!

I'm still expecting some sort of emotional entanglement between
Barclay and Ms Fish lizard too... and there was definitely none
of THAT in Interstellar!!!
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <10hca7d$1ldgc$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:

On 10/12/2025 14:32, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

On 09/12/2025 10:25, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

I always cared about Matthew McConaughey's character and
that of his daughter and her brother from the first 5
minutes of Interstellar.

Can't say I cared much about either of them to be honest. It
was just a film to watch... a good one mind you.

Did you actually understand the film? Everything in it was
totally dependent on the relationship between the father and
his daughter.

I don't watch movies at the cinema to be intellectually
stimulated, I go for the entertainment... and the popcorn with a
bag of Maltesers thrown in to the box. "Interstellar" was a good
sci-fi movie with a good cast, it looked great too... but I
can't see how it relates in any way to "The War Between the Land

I already explained that in my review.

and the Sea" mini-series. They are chalk and cheese. Quality
wise, cast wise, acting wise... in fact, in everything!

It's only 10 paragraphs per episode.

That's still a bit much just to say it's "woke garbage"...

I need to explain why or I will fail.

I think we all know what you mean!

In fact, I'm pretty sure we know what you mean before you even
say it!

Why use two thousand words when two will do?! ;-)

I say three. crap!

No need to be excessive!

There need to be at least two adjectives before crap to describe exactly >what kind of crap it is.

RTD must go.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <10hca9g$1ldgc$3@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:

On 10/12/2025 14:39, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

On 09/12/2025 12:42, Blueshirt wrote:

I'm pretty sure Agamemnon will be back next weekend with
his thoughts on episode's three and four...

Don't tell me they're so desperate to get this degenerate
shit over with they're showing another 2 episodes back to
back?

Yes, they are.

F*k them!

BBC are adrift.

With the one episode finale on the 21st.

He can review them so I don't have to!

But I have to torture myself and watch them first.

I'm sure you will manage. Agamemnon was a legendary hero
remember? It's in your blood!

I don't want to go through this torment again.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <xn0pedrhn2tiehw000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

On 10/12/2025 14:39, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

Don't tell me they're so desperate to get this degenerate
shit over with they're showing another 2 episodes back to
back?

Yes, they are.

F*k them!

Clearly the BBC didn't want it running into their Christmas
schedules...

So now it'll be done and dusted on the 21st...

No DW Christmas special fir 2025 noted!

But I have to torture myself and watch them first.

I'm sure you will manage. Agamemnon was a legendary
hero remember? It's in your blood!

I don't want to go through this torment again.

It wasn't THAT bad!!!

My primary thoughts on it [TWBTLATS] are that in places it's
better written than the last season of Doctor Who... but with
only two episodes seen, my opinion could change... in either
direction.

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <xn0pedrns2tra28001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

On 10/12/2025 14:32, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

Did you actually understand the film? Everything in it was
totally dependent on the relationship between the father
and his daughter.

I don't watch movies at the cinema to be intellectually
stimulated, I go for the entertainment... and the popcorn
with a bag of Maltesers thrown in to the box. "Interstellar"
was a good sci-fi movie with a good cast, it looked great
too... but I can't see how it relates in any way to "The War
Between the Land

I already explained that in my review.

I read it, but there's plenty of films and TV shows that deal
with Father/Daughter relationships... Interstellar wouldn't be
top of my list for that!

I'm still expecting some sort of emotional entanglement between
Barclay and Ms Fish lizard too... and there was definitely none
of THAT in Interstellar!!!

What is your optimal length for a review?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

On 10/12/2025 20:01, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

On 10/12/2025 14:39, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

Don't tell me they're so desperate to get this degenerate
shit over with they're showing another 2 episodes back to
back?

Yes, they are.

Fuck them!

Clearly the BBC didn't want it running into their Christmas
schedules...

Well it has. All they want to do is attack and insult all of their
viewers the disgusting, virtue signalling, fake news and false narrative manufacturing hypocrites.

So now it'll be done and dusted on the 21st...

Yes, ruining everybody's Christmas so they can spread their sickening
woke likes and propaganda.

But I have to torture myself and watch them first.

I'm sure you will manage. Agamemnon was a legendary
hero remember? It's in your blood!

I don't want to go through this torment again.

It wasn't THAT bad!!!

Yes it was. It's absolute crap showing that British writers don't have
the remotest clue how to write drama. This is the produce of low level clueless and talentless soap opera hacks that don't give give a shit
about the story or play and only care about political messaging.

My primary thoughts on it [TWBTLATS] are that in places it's
better written than the last season of Doctor Who... but with

That would not be difficult since the fake Doctor was portrayed as a disgusting, racist, mass murdering, sexually harassing, effeminate
homosexual, written as a woman.

only two episodes seen, my opinion could change... in either
direction.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for." --William Shatner
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

On 10/12/2025 19:58, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

On 10/12/2025 14:32, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

Did you actually understand the film? Everything in it was
totally dependent on the relationship between the father
and his daughter.

I don't watch movies at the cinema to be intellectually
stimulated, I go for the entertainment... and the popcorn
with a bag of Maltesers thrown in to the box. "Interstellar"
was a good sci-fi movie with a good cast, it looked great
too... but I can't see how it relates in any way to "The War
Between the Land

I already explained that in my review.

I read it, but there's plenty of films and TV shows that deal
with Father/Daughter relationships... Interstellar wouldn't be
top of my list for that!

Wrong. Interstellar makes the relationship drive the plot. It's not
there as filler because the writers can't write which is what happens in
most of the others. Another good example of Back to the Future where all
the character relationships actually matter. Degenerate low level soap
opera hacks and political playwrights like Davies and McTighe don't have
the remotest clue how to do this.

I'm still expecting some sort of emotional entanglement between
Barclay and Ms Fish lizard too... and there was definitely none
of THAT in Interstellar!!!

Why would Interstellar want to do bestiality? If there were to be any
the talentless, audience-hating, piece of shit McTighe isn't capable of writing romance anyway. The degenerate moron's idea of romance is to
pair off Kate Stewart with a homosexual man that she's never gone
through any kind of romantic journey with.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for." --William Shatner
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <10hd2ea$1sm57$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:

On 10/12/2025 20:01, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

On 10/12/2025 14:39, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

Don't tell me they're so desperate to get this degenerate
shit over with they're showing another 2 episodes back to
back?

Yes, they are.

F*k them!

Clearly the BBC didn't want it running into their Christmas
schedules...

Well it has. All they want to do is attack and insult all of their
viewers the disgusting, virtue signalling, fake news and false narrative >manufacturing hypocrites.

Disgusting.

So now it'll be done and dusted on the 21st...

Yes, ruining everybody's Christmas so they can spread their sickening
woke likes and propaganda.

But I have to torture myself and watch them first.

I'm sure you will manage. Agamemnon was a legendary
hero remember? It's in your blood!

I don't want to go through this torment again.

It wasn't THAT bad!!!

Yes it was. It's absolute crap showing that British writers don't have
the remotest clue how to write drama. This is the produce of low level >clueless and talentless soap opera hacks that don't give give a shit
about the story or play and only care about political messaging.

My primary thoughts on it [TWBTLATS] are that in places it's
better written than the last season of Doctor Who... but with

That would not be difficult since the fake Doctor was portrayed as a >disgusting, racist, mass murdering, sexually harassing, effeminate >homosexual, written as a woman.

only two episodes seen, my opinion could change... in either
direction.

We shall see.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <10hd35q$1srnm$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:

On 10/12/2025 19:58, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

On 10/12/2025 14:32, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

Did you actually understand the film? Everything in it was
totally dependent on the relationship between the father
and his daughter.

I don't watch movies at the cinema to be intellectually
stimulated, I go for the entertainment... and the popcorn
with a bag of Maltesers thrown in to the box. "Interstellar"
was a good sci-fi movie with a good cast, it looked great
too... but I can't see how it relates in any way to "The War
Between the Land

I already explained that in my review.

I read it, but there's plenty of films and TV shows that deal
with Father/Daughter relationships... Interstellar wouldn't be
top of my list for that!

Wrong. Interstellar makes the relationship drive the plot. It's not
there as filler because the writers can't write which is what happens in >most of the others. Another good example of Back to the Future where all
the character relationships actually matter. Degenerate low level soap
opera hacks and political playwrights like Davies and McTighe don't have
the remotest clue how to do this.

I'm still expecting some sort of emotional entanglement between
Barclay and Ms Fish lizard too... and there was definitely none
of THAT in Interstellar!!!

Why would Interstellar want to do bestiality? If there were to be any
the talentless, audience-hating, piece of s*t McTighe isn't capable of >writing romance anyway. The degenerate moron's idea of romance is to
pair off Kate Stewart with a homosexual man that she's never gone
through any kind of romantic journey with.

Can MgTighe do Gentleman Jack?

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

On 10/12/2025 10:42 pm, Daniel70 wrote:

On 9/12/2025 10:21 pm, solar penguin wrote:

Blueshirt seemed bamboozled:

By mentioning the Doctor I keep coming back to the issue that
if all those Sea Devils rose up in cities all around the world,
as depicted... would the Doctor really just ignore them and not
get involved? Ncuti's Doctor might have gone [somewhere], but
there's still a Doctor relaxing in London.

Here’s one fan’s answer:
https://youtu.be/R-IiSeyU95c

WHAT IS UP WITH HIS HAIR??

(Yes, I know.)

.... and, by Him, I meant DoctorDavid. ;-P
--
Daniel70
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <10he0ss$236ef$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

On 10/12/2025 10:42 pm, Daniel70 wrote:

On 9/12/2025 10:21 pm, solar penguin wrote:

Blueshirt seemed bamboozled:

By mentioning the Doctor I keep coming back to the issue that
if all those Sea Devils rose up in cities all around the world,
as depicted... would the Doctor really just ignore them and not
get involved? Ncuti's Doctor might have gone [somewhere], but
there's still a Doctor relaxing in London.

Here’s one fan’s answer:
https://youtu.be/R-IiSeyU95c

WHAT IS UP WITH HIS HAIR??

(Yes, I know.)

.... and, by Him, I meant DoctorDavid. ;-P

You would.

--
Daniel70

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

On 12/8/2025 23:22, The True Doctor wrote:

On 09/12/2025 04:55, solar imbecile wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

On 08/12/2025 21:05, Blueshirt wrote:

Aggy should be aware of how stories work. He is our resident
professor of literature

I'm aware that neither Davies or McTighe can't writer them.

I'm aware that neither Davies or McTighe can write them.

Neither can’t you writer simple sentences.

The spell checker changed the words I intended to write.

Ah, we've all heard *that* broken record before...and it was bullshit
then, and it is still bullshit now.
--

Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <c8z_Q.1287$R0Uc.584@fx09.ams4>,
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:

On 12/8/2025 23:22, The True Doctor wrote:

On 09/12/2025 04:55, solar imbecile wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

On 08/12/2025 21:05, Blueshirt wrote:

Aggy should be aware of how stories work. He is our resident
professor of literature

I'm aware that neither Davies or McTighe can't writer them.

I'm aware that neither Davies or McTighe can write them.

Neither can’t you writer simple sentences.

The spell checker changed the words I intended to write.

Ah, we've all heard *that* broken record before...and it was bull
then, and it is still bull now.

You would, horney!

--

Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

The True Doctor wrote:

On 10/12/2025 20:01, Blueshirt wrote:

So now it'll be done and dusted on the 21st...

Yes, ruining everybody's Christmas so they can spread
their sickening woke likes and propaganda.

The 21st isn't Christmas. And you'll ruin your own Christmas
by getting worked up over a nothing TV series that's only meant
as a bit of light entertainment on a Sunday evening. It's not a
documentary!

It wasn't THAT bad!!!

Yes it was. It's absolute crap showing that British writers
don't have the remotest clue how to write drama. This is the
produce of low level clueless and talentless soap opera hacks
that don't give give a shit about the story or play and only
care about political messaging.

The first episode was better than the second, writing wise...
but I didn't think either episode was at the crap level. They
were par for the course for a typical BBC drama in 2025 with a
jumbled-up message and the right boxes being ticked.


--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.drwho

In article <xn0peew5n4c0sps000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

On 10/12/2025 20:01, Blueshirt wrote:

So now it'll be done and dusted on the 21st...

Yes, ruining everybody's Christmas so they can spread
their sickening woke likes and propaganda.

The 21st isn't Christmas. And you'll ruin your own Christmas
by getting worked up over a nothing TV series that's only meant
as a bit of light entertainment on a Sunday evening. It's not a
documentary!

It wasn't THAT bad!!!

Yes it was. It's absolute crap showing that British writers
don't have the remotest clue how to write drama. This is the
produce of low level clueless and talentless soap opera hacks
that don't give give a shit about the story or play and only
care about political messaging.

The first episode was better than the second, writing wise...
but I didn't think either episode was at the crap level. They
were par for the course for a typical BBC drama in 2025 with a
jumbled-up message and the right boxes being ticked.

Please note the RTD flamers in the crowd.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2