Essex police have turned off their live facial recognition cameras as they >were catching too many black people committing crimes. They have also >admitted that it was extremely rare the cameras would flag somebody up who >wasn't on the watchlist.
They put up cameras to catch bad people, the cameras caught the bad people, >but because they were predominantly black, the cameras had to go.
https://x.com/BROKENBRITAIN0/status/2034870668265701418?s=20
------------------------------
So rather than arrest the criminals regardless of their skin color, the >government deemed the *cameras* (and therefore, one assumes, reality) to be >racist and got rid of them. Sounds about right.
In article <10pn33i$2pmvq$2@dont-email.me>, atropos@mac.com wrote:
Essex police have turned off their live facial recognition cameras as they >> were catching too many black people committing crimes. They have also
admitted that it was extremely rare the cameras would flag somebody up who >> wasn't on the watchlist.
They put up cameras to catch bad people, the cameras caught the bad people, >> but because they were predominantly black, the cameras had to go.
https://x.com/BROKENBRITAIN0/status/2034870668265701418?s=20
------------------------------
So rather than arrest the criminals regardless of their skin color, the
government deemed the *cameras* (and therefore, one assumes, reality) to be >> racist and got rid of them. Sounds about right.
TBH, I am surprised that hasn't happened here yet, especially since it reveals all the lies about policemen being racisstss.
. . .
There actually is a real movement in the U.S. by the same racial grievance >crowd that pushed for bodycams after the Saint Floyd of Fentanyl (peace be >upon him) incident to now ban them because-- rather than catch all sorts of >racist cops doing horrible things to black people-- the body cams have >revealed just how feral and unhinged the black community is on a daily basis >and that for every one instance of police misconduct caught on video, the >cameras clear a hundred cops of false claims of brutality and racism.
Since the cameras show the reality of how black people behave and don't allow >them to successfully lie about being mistreated by police, they've been >declared racist and race hustlers like Sharpton and Kendi and Jasmine Crockett >have called for them to be banned.
The whole BLM demand for bodycams movement has been one of the biggest >self-owns in the history of race hustling.
The whole BLM demand for bodycams movement has been one of the biggest >>self-owns in the history of race hustling.
Tue, 24 Mar 2026 19:32:08 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>:
The whole BLM demand for bodycams movement has been one of the biggest >>>self-owns in the history of race hustling.
I believe the above line was written by BTR but Adam may know the term
- I've never heard the term "self-owns" before - is that the same as
the British football (e.g. what we North Americans call soccer) folks
call an "own goal"?
The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
Tue, 24 Mar 2026 19:32:08 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>:
The whole BLM demand for bodycams movement has been one of the biggest >>>> self-owns in the history of race hustling.
I believe the above line was written by BTR but Adam may know the term
- I've never heard the term "self-owns" before - is that the same as
the British football (e.g. what we North Americans call soccer) folks
call an "own goal"?
It's "You can't stop thinking about me. I own your headspace." You're obsessing over having lost a meaningless argument on line in a
humiliating way rather than just immediately acting like an adult and
owning up to having made a mistake.
In this case, it was failure to consider that video evidence gathered is neutral and that a bodycam is going to capture the person being
encountered by police misbehaving and will not provide evidence of P.I.
to justify a lawsuit against police.
On Mar 27, 2026 at 1:25:03 AM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
Tue, 24 Mar 2026 19:32:08 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>:
The whole BLM demand for bodycams movement has been one of the biggest >>>>> self-owns in the history of race hustling.
I believe the above line was written by BTR but Adam may know the term
- I've never heard the term "self-owns" before - is that the same as
the British football (e.g. what we North Americans call soccer) folks
call an "own goal"?
It's "You can't stop thinking about me. I own your headspace." You're
obsessing over having lost a meaningless argument on line in a
humiliating way rather than just immediately acting like an adult and
owning up to having made a mistake.
In this case, it was failure to consider that video evidence gathered is
neutral and that a bodycam is going to capture the person being
encountered by police misbehaving and will not provide evidence of P.I.
to justify a lawsuit against police.
Earlier this year, Democrats in Congress were demanding that ICE agents be required to wear bodycams, something to which the Republicans readily agreed. Now, as part of their DHS shutdown demands, they're backtracking and saying, "On second thought, we don't really want the cameras on all the time. We demand rules about when they can and can't be recording."
Nothing says "peaceful protest" like demanding all cameras be turned off. Their problem is that the cameras don't know who the approved villains are and
tend to capture everything without political bias.
On Mar 23, 2026 at 6:13:06 PM PDT, "Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
TBH, I am surprised that hasn't happened here yet, especially since it
reveals all the lies about policemen being racisstss.
There actually is a real movement in the U.S. by the same racial grievance >crowd that pushed for bodycams after the Saint Floyd of Fentanyl (peace be >upon him) incident to now ban them because-- rather than catch all sorts of >racist cops doing horrible things to black people-- the body cams have >revealed just how feral and unhinged the black community is on a daily basis >and that for every one instance of police misconduct caught on video, the >cameras clear a hundred cops of false claims of brutality and racism.
Since the cameras show the reality of how black people behave and don't >allow them to successfully lie about being mistreated by police, they've >been declared racist and race hustlers like Sharpton and Kendi and Jasmine >Crockett have called for them to be banned.
The whole BLM demand for bodycams movement has been one of the biggest >self-owns in the history of race hustling.
BTR1701 wrote:
The whole BLM demand for bodycams movement has been one of the
biggest self-owns in the history of race hustling.
I've never heard the term "self-owns" before - is that the same as
the British football (e.g. what we North Americans call soccer) folks
call an "own goal"?
craver@home.ca wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
The whole BLM demand for bodycams movement has been one of the
biggest self-owns in the history of race hustling.
I've never heard the term "self-owns" before - is that the same as
the British football (e.g. what we North Americans call soccer) folks
call an "own goal"?
It's derived from the turn-of-the-milenium slang term "to own",
AKA "to pwn" and applies to humiliating someone. A 'self-own"
occurs when someone emabrasses himself. In this case, the race
hustlers thought that using body cameras would prove that cops
are racist but actually vindicated them.
In article <10q7ua7$d16a$4@dont-email.me>, weberm@polaris.net wrote:
craver@home.ca wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
The whole BLM demand for bodycams movement has been one of the
biggest self-owns in the history of race hustling.
I've never heard the term "self-owns" before - is that the same as
the British football (e.g. what we North Americans call soccer) folks >>>call an "own goal"?
It's derived from the turn-of-the-milenium slang term "to own",
AKA "to pwn" and applies to humiliating someone. A 'self-own"
occurs when someone emabrasses himself. In this case, the race
hustlers thought that using body cameras would prove that cops
are racist but actually vindicated them.
Haku Bookman provided a good example today. He put up a little podium
in an airport and gave a speach blaming Republicans for all the
troubles in airports. Unfortunately, for him, he was the only person
there.
Wink-WAH!
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
In article <10q7ua7$d16a$4@dont-email.me>, weberm@polaris.net wrote:
craver@home.ca wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
The whole BLM demand for bodycams movement has been one of the
biggest self-owns in the history of race hustling.
I've never heard the term "self-owns" before - is that the same as
the British football (e.g. what we North Americans call soccer)
folks call an "own goal"?
It's derived from the turn-of-the-milenium slang term "to own",
AKA "to pwn" and applies to humiliating someone. A 'self-own"
occurs when someone emabrasses himself. In this case, the race
hustlers thought that using body cameras would prove that cops
are racist but actually vindicated them.
Haku Bookman provided a good example today. He put up a little podium
in an airport and gave a speach blaming Republicans for all the
troubles in airports. Unfortunately, for him, he was the only person >>there.
Wink-WAH!
You mean that wasn't a Saturday Night Live skit?
On 3/27/2026 2:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 27, 2026 at 1:25:03 AM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com>
wrote:
The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
Tue, 24 Mar 2026 19:32:08 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>: >>>
The whole BLM demand for bodycams movement has been one of the biggest >>>>>> self-owns in the history of race hustling.
I believe the above line was written by BTR but Adam may know the term >>>> - I've never heard the term "self-owns" before - is that the same as
the British football (e.g. what we North Americans call soccer) folks >>>> call an "own goal"?
It's "You can't stop thinking about me. I own your headspace." You're
obsessing over having lost a meaningless argument on line in a
humiliating way rather than just immediately acting like an adult and
owning up to having made a mistake.
In this case, it was failure to consider that video evidence gathered is >>> neutral and that a bodycam is going to capture the person being
encountered by police misbehaving and will not provide evidence of P.I. >>> to justify a lawsuit against police.
Earlier this year, Democrats in Congress were demanding that ICE agents be >> required to wear bodycams, something to which the Republicans readily
agreed.
Now, as part of their DHS shutdown demands, they're backtracking and saying,
"On second thought, we don't really want the cameras on all the time. We
demand rules about when they can and can't be recording."
Nothing says "peaceful protest" like demanding all cameras be turned off. >> Their problem is that the cameras don't know who the approved villains are >> and
tend to capture everything without political bias.
Googling tells me only that Dems (Mar 24) *want* the bodycams (that
Biden ordered for *all* govt. cops). Got a cite of the "backtracking"?
On Mar 27, 2026 at 11:24:04 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/27/2026 2:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 27, 2026 at 1:25:03 AM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> >>> wrote:
The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
Tue, 24 Mar 2026 19:32:08 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>: >>>>
The whole BLM demand for bodycams movement has been one of the biggest
self-owns in the history of race hustling.
I believe the above line was written by BTR but Adam may know the term >>>>> - I've never heard the term "self-owns" before - is that the same as >>>>> the British football (e.g. what we North Americans call soccer) folks >>>>> call an "own goal"?
It's "You can't stop thinking about me. I own your headspace." You're >>>> obsessing over having lost a meaningless argument on line in a
humiliating way rather than just immediately acting like an adult and >>>> owning up to having made a mistake.
In this case, it was failure to consider that video evidence gathered is >>>> neutral and that a bodycam is going to capture the person being
encountered by police misbehaving and will not provide evidence of P.I. >>>> to justify a lawsuit against police.
Earlier this year, Democrats in Congress were demanding that ICE agents be
required to wear bodycams, something to which the Republicans readily
agreed.
Now, as part of their DHS shutdown demands, they're backtracking and saying,
"On second thought, we don't really want the cameras on all the time. We >>> demand rules about when they can and can't be recording."
Nothing says "peaceful protest" like demanding all cameras be turned off. >>> Their problem is that the cameras don't know who the approved villains are
and
tend to capture everything without political bias.
Googling tells me only that Dems (Mar 24) *want* the bodycams (that
Biden ordered for *all* govt. cops). Got a cite of the "backtracking"?
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/07/democrats-fear-body-cameras-could-be-ices-new-mass-surveillance-tool-00769363
craver@home.ca wrote:
BTR1701 wrote:
The whole BLM demand for bodycams movement has been one of the
biggest self-owns in the history of race hustling.
I've never heard the term "self-owns" before - is that the same as
the British football (e.g. what we North Americans call soccer) folks
call an "own goal"?
It's derived from the turn-of-the-milenium slang term "to own",
AKA "to pwn" and applies to humiliating someone. A 'self-own"
occurs when someone emabrasses himself.
In this case, the race
hustlers thought that using body cameras would prove that cops
are racist but actually vindicated them.
Essex police have turned off their live facial recognition cameras as they were catching too many black people committing crimes. They have also admitted
that it was extremely rare the cameras would flag somebody up who wasn't on the watchlist.
They put up cameras to catch bad people, the cameras caught the bad people, but because they were predominantly black, the cameras had to go.
https://x.com/BROKENBRITAIN0/status/2034870668265701418?s=20
------------------------------
So rather than arrest the criminals regardless of their skin color, the government deemed the *cameras* (and therefore, one assumes, reality) to be racist and got rid of them. Sounds about right.
On 3/31/2026 2:36 AM, BTR1701 wrote:hustling.
On Mar 27, 2026 at 11:24:04 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>> On 3/27/2026 2:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
"Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>:
The whole BLM demand for bodycams movement has been one of the >>>>>>>> biggest self-owns in the history of race
owns" before - is that the
I believe the above line was written by BTR but Adam may know the >>>>>> term - I've never heard the term "self-
to capture the person beingsame as the British football (e.g. what we North Americans call >>>>>> soccer) folks call an "own goal"?
It's "You can't stop thinking about me. I own your headspace." You're >>>>> obsessing over having lost a meaningless argument on line in a
humiliating way rather than just immediately acting like an adult and >>>>> owning up to having made a mistake.
In this case, it was failure to consider that video evidence gathered >>>>> is neutral and that a bodycam is going
encountered by police misbehaving and will not provide evidence of >>>>> P.I. to justify a lawsuit against police.
Earlier this year, Democrats in Congress were demanding that ICE
agents be required to wear bodycams, something to which the Republicans >>>> readily agreed. Now, as part of their DHS shutdown demands, they're
backtracking and saying,
"On second thought, we don't really want the cameras on all the time. >>>> We demand rules about when they can and can't be recording."
Nothing says "peaceful protest" like demanding all cameras be turned >>>> off. Their problem is that the cameras don't know who the approved
villains are and tend to capture everything without political bias.
Googling tells me only that Dems (Mar 24) *want* the bodycams (that
Biden ordered for *all* govt. cops). Got a cite of the "backtracking"?
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/07/democrats-fear-body-cameras-could-be-ices-new-mass-surveillance-tool-00769363
Okay, that does at least attest to considerable confusion (...which I
share in my own conflicted views about bodycams and surveillance).
On Mar 27, 2026 at 11:24:04 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/27/2026 2:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 27, 2026 at 1:25:03 AM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com>
wrote:
The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
Tue, 24 Mar 2026 19:32:08 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>: >>>>
The whole BLM demand for bodycams movement has been one of the biggest >>>>>>> self-owns in the history of race hustling.
I believe the above line was written by BTR but Adam may know the term >>>>> - I've never heard the term "self-owns" before - is that the same as >>>>> the British football (e.g. what we North Americans call soccer) folks >>>>> call an "own goal"?
It's "You can't stop thinking about me. I own your headspace." You're >>>> obsessing over having lost a meaningless argument on line in a
humiliating way rather than just immediately acting like an adult and >>>> owning up to having made a mistake.
In this case, it was failure to consider that video evidence gathered is >>>> neutral and that a bodycam is going to capture the person being
encountered by police misbehaving and will not provide evidence of P.I. >>>> to justify a lawsuit against police.
Earlier this year, Democrats in Congress were demanding that ICE agents be >>> required to wear bodycams, something to which the Republicans readily
agreed.
Now, as part of their DHS shutdown demands, they're backtracking and saying,
"On second thought, we don't really want the cameras on all the time. We >>> demand rules about when they can and can't be recording."
Nothing says "peaceful protest" like demanding all cameras be turned off. >>> Their problem is that the cameras don't know who the approved villains are >>> and
tend to capture everything without political bias.
Googling tells me only that Dems (Mar 24) *want* the bodycams (that
Biden ordered for *all* govt. cops). Got a cite of the "backtracking"?
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/07/democrats-fear-body-cameras-could-be-ices-new-mass-surveillance-tool-00769363
| Sysop: | Scott Duensing |
|---|---|
| Location: | Freeburg, IL, USA, Earth |
| Users: | 5 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 493213:26:32 |
| Calls: | 5 |
| Messages: | 18,934 |