• OT Are children of Native Americans birthright citizens

    From shawn@nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com to rec.arts.tv on Wed Apr 1 15:16:43 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    I never considered it but that is part of the argument before the
    Supreme Court it in this case. Not sure where I fall on the issue but
    I always thought anyone born in the USA would be birthright citizens
    and that it would include those born on tribal lands, but apparently
    not.

    That's not to say they aren't citizens because they've been granted it
    via law, just not by the 14th amendment, or so the argument goes.

    https://x.com/atrupar/status/2039360113350189428
    GORSUCH: Do you think Native Americans are birthright citizens under
    your test?

    SAUER: Ah, I think ... so. I have to think that through.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Adam H. Kerman@ahk@chinet.com to rec.arts.tv on Wed Apr 1 20:53:05 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:

    I never considered it but that is part of the argument before the
    Supreme Court it in this case. Not sure where I fall on the issue but
    I always thought anyone born in the USA would be birthright citizens
    and that it would include those born on tribal lands, but apparently
    not.

    That's not to say they aren't citizens because they've been granted it
    via law, just not by the 14th amendment, or so the argument goes.

    https://x.com/atrupar/status/2039360113350189428
    GORSUCH: Do you think Native Americans are birthright citizens under
    your test?

    SAUER: Ah, I think ... so. I have to think that through.

    I don't know what test he offered, but it's more than a century since
    the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 became law. Before that, "Indians not
    taxed" weren't United States citizens. Technically, that's not by the
    14th Amendment but an act of Congress.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From BTR1701@atropos@mac.com to rec.arts.tv on Thu Apr 2 03:58:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On Apr 1, 2026 at 1:53:05 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

    shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:

    I never considered it but that is part of the argument before the
    Supreme Court it in this case. Not sure where I fall on the issue but
    I always thought anyone born in the USA would be birthright citizens
    and that it would include those born on tribal lands, but apparently
    not.

    That's not to say they aren't citizens because they've been granted it
    via law, just not by the 14th amendment, or so the argument goes.

    https://x.com/atrupar/status/2039360113350189428
    GORSUCH: Do you think Native Americans are birthright citizens under
    your test?

    SAUER: Ah, I think ... so. I have to think that through.

    I don't know what test he offered, but it's more than a century since
    the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 became law. Before that, "Indians not taxed" weren't United States citizens. Technically, that's not by the
    14th Amendment but an act of Congress.

    The Left's argument for birthright citizenship is obviously insane but it's even more insane when you consider that they actually don't believe in your or my "birthright". They constantly claim we are on stolen land and have no right to be here, but the anchor baby whose parents got here from Guatemala 10 seconds ago has a "birthright" and is tied to this nation by blood for all time. That's actually their position. It's so psychotic that you can't even argue against it. It's like trying to have a political debate with a rutabaga. These are not serious people.


    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From shawn@nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com to rec.arts.tv on Thu Apr 2 00:11:30 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On Thu, 2 Apr 2026 03:58:01 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
    wrote:

    On Apr 1, 2026 at 1:53:05 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

    shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:

    I never considered it but that is part of the argument before the
    Supreme Court it in this case. Not sure where I fall on the issue but
    I always thought anyone born in the USA would be birthright citizens
    and that it would include those born on tribal lands, but apparently
    not.

    That's not to say they aren't citizens because they've been granted it
    via law, just not by the 14th amendment, or so the argument goes.

    https://x.com/atrupar/status/2039360113350189428
    GORSUCH: Do you think Native Americans are birthright citizens under
    your test?

    SAUER: Ah, I think ... so. I have to think that through.

    I don't know what test he offered, but it's more than a century since
    the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 became law. Before that, "Indians not
    taxed" weren't United States citizens. Technically, that's not by the
    14th Amendment but an act of Congress.

    The Left's argument for birthright citizenship is obviously insane but it's >even more insane when you consider that they actually don't believe in your or >my "birthright". They constantly claim we are on stolen land and have no right >to be here, but the anchor baby whose parents got here from Guatemala 10 >seconds ago has a "birthright" and is tied to this nation by blood for all >time. That's actually their position. It's so psychotic that you can't even >argue against it. It's like trying to have a political debate with a rutabaga. >These are not serious people.


    So who does belong here? I know that the tribal myths talk about them
    being formed out of the Earth (at least for some tribes) but in
    reality we know that they came from elsewhere. So if they came from
    elsewhere does that mean the land belongs to no one. Should it then be
    left empty and we all return to Africa?

    As for your discussion I expect that is from two different
    conversations because it seems clear that the people arguing about who
    truly belongs here would say only native Americans, and they aren't
    considering the issue of birthright citizens as it seems they would
    argue the USA has no right to exist and therefore there can be no
    argument for birthright citizenship.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From BTR1701@atropos@mac.com to rec.arts.tv on Thu Apr 2 04:25:05 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On Apr 1, 2026 at 9:11:30 PM PDT, "shawn" <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:

    On Thu, 2 Apr 2026 03:58:01 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
    wrote:

    On Apr 1, 2026 at 1:53:05 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote: >>
    shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:

    I never considered it but that is part of the argument before the
    Supreme Court it in this case. Not sure where I fall on the issue but >>>> I always thought anyone born in the USA would be birthright citizens
    and that it would include those born on tribal lands, but apparently
    not.

    That's not to say they aren't citizens because they've been granted it >>>> via law, just not by the 14th amendment, or so the argument goes.

    https://x.com/atrupar/status/2039360113350189428
    GORSUCH: Do you think Native Americans are birthright citizens under
    your test?

    SAUER: Ah, I think ... so. I have to think that through.

    I don't know what test he offered, but it's more than a century since
    the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 became law. Before that, "Indians not >>> taxed" weren't United States citizens. Technically, that's not by the
    14th Amendment but an act of Congress.

    The Left's argument for birthright citizenship is obviously insane but it's >> even more insane when you consider that they actually don't believe in your >> or
    my "birthright". They constantly claim we are on stolen land and have no
    right
    to be here, but the anchor baby whose parents got here from Guatemala 10
    seconds ago has a "birthright" and is tied to this nation by blood for all >> time. That's actually their position. It's so psychotic that you can't even >> argue against it. It's like trying to have a political debate with a
    rutabaga.
    These are not serious people.

    So who does belong here? I know that the tribal myths talk about them
    being formed out of the Earth (at least for some tribes) but in
    reality we know that they came from elsewhere. So if they came from
    elsewhere does that mean the land belongs to no one. Should it then be
    left empty and we all return to Africa?

    As for your discussion I expect that is from two different
    conversations because it seems clear that the people arguing about who
    truly belongs here would say only native Americans, and they aren't considering the issue of birthright citizens as it seems they would
    argue the USA has no right to exist and therefore there can be no
    argument for birthright citizenship.

    They may have these conversations separately but the same people who say one thing will also say the other. They never stop to reflect that they hold diametrically opposed and logically incongruent beliefs depending on who they are talking to.


    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ubiquitous@weberm@polaris.net to rec.arts.tv on Thu Apr 2 03:06:08 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com wrote:

    I never considered it but that is part of the argument before the
    Supreme Court it in this case. Not sure where I fall on the issue but
    I always thought anyone born in the USA would be birthright citizens
    and that it would include those born on tribal lands, but apparently
    not.

    That's not to say they aren't citizens because they've been granted it
    via law, just not by the 14th amendment, or so the argument goes.

    https://x.com/atrupar/status/2039360113350189428
    GORSUCH: Do you think Native Americans are birthright citizens under
    your test?

    SAUER: Ah, I think ... so. I have to think that through.

    The answer is "no".
    --
    Democrats and the liberal media hate President Trump more than they
    love this country.

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2