• Kelly Ripa Reads Unacceptable Workplace Words, and Gen Zers Taking Mom to Work, w/ Marlaina Schiavo

    From Ubiquitous@weberm@polaris.net to rec.arts.tv,alt.tv.talkshows.daytime on Fri Nov 21 12:51:04 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    Maureen Callahan is joined by The Nerve’s producer Marlaina Schiavo to
    discuss the changing workplace culture that caters to the sensitivities of young employee and a new report on how the majority of Gen Zers bring parents with them on job interviews. Maureen and Marlaina share an eye roll when discussing when the culture started shift, with true stories about former colleagues who would meltdown under the slightest pressure, and more.

    https://youtu.be/5zSEQF3uTFA?si=3PXpzwoXXq_WdWBS

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From BTR1701@atropos@mac.com to alt.tv.talkshows.daytime,rec.arts.tv on Fri Nov 21 20:47:39 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On Nov 21, 2025 at 9:51:04 AM PST, "Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

    Maureen Callahan is joined by The Nerve’s producer Marlaina Schiavo to discuss the changing workplace culture that caters to the sensitivities of young employee and a new report on how the majority of Gen Zers bring parents

    with them on job interviews.

    Why would that even be allowed? When I sat on the recruitment panel for new hires in my agency, we would never have allowed some guy's mom to sit in on
    the interview with him. And, honestly, the fact that he even brought her in
    the first place would have gotten him shit-canned instantly.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rhino@no_offline_contact@example.com to alt.tv.talkshows.daytime,rec.arts.tv on Fri Nov 21 20:10:56 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On 2025-11-21 3:47 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
    On Nov 21, 2025 at 9:51:04 AM PST, "Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

    Maureen Callahan is joined by The Nerve’s producer Marlaina Schiavo to
    discuss the changing workplace culture that caters to the sensitivities of >> young employee and a new report on how the majority of Gen Zers bring parents

    with them on job interviews.

    Why would that even be allowed? When I sat on the recruitment panel for new hires in my agency, we would never have allowed some guy's mom to sit in on the interview with him. And, honestly, the fact that he even brought her in the first place would have gotten him shit-canned instantly.


    I'll never forget an incident I read about a few years ago. A young
    woman who had been hired to edit an article in the publication she
    worked for was sitting with her boss, another woman, and going over the
    edits she had made. The boss made a few comments on this and that and
    then said, by the way, her junior editor has missed a typo and would she please correct it. The younger woman was puzzled and asked what typo she
    had missed. "You spelled "hampster" with a 'p' but it's supposed to be
    spelled "hamster". The young woman protested. "But it's supposed to be
    spelled with a 'p'!". The older woman pulled up a dictionary and said
    "Let's see what the dictionary says.... Here it is: "hamster", no 'p'".
    But rather than gracefully admitting her error and making the
    correction, the younger woman *insisted* on spelling it "hampster". When
    her boss said that was unacceptable, the younger woman phoned her mother
    at work and demanded that the mother persuade her boss to let the
    misspelled word remain misspelled - and the mother proceeded to argue
    with the boss.

    This struck me as one of the looniest things I'd ever heard. The whole
    idea of calling your parents over such a matter - and then the parents actually trying to intercede with your boss - is beyond ludicrous
    especially when they'd already established that "hampster" is NOT
    spelled with a 'p'. This young woman literally wanted her private
    misspelling of a well-known word to take precedence over the correct
    spelling and actually played the parent card in an attempt to have her way.

    After reading about that incident, I'm fully prepared to believe that
    some people bring their parents to job interviews. I'll be darned if I
    can understand why anyone would hire someone who did that though. The
    very fact that they did so seems like clear proof that the candidate
    isn't mature enough to be employed.
    --
    Rhino
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From shawn@nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com to alt.tv.talkshows.daytime,rec.arts.tv on Fri Nov 21 20:20:02 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On Fri, 21 Nov 2025 20:10:56 -0500, Rhino
    <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    On 2025-11-21 3:47 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
    On Nov 21, 2025 at 9:51:04 AM PST, "Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote: >>
    Maureen Callahan is joined by The Nerve’s producer Marlaina Schiavo to >>> discuss the changing workplace culture that caters to the sensitivities of >>> young employee and a new report on how the majority of Gen Zers bring parents

    with them on job interviews.

    Why would that even be allowed? When I sat on the recruitment panel for new >> hires in my agency, we would never have allowed some guy's mom to sit in on >> the interview with him. And, honestly, the fact that he even brought her in >> the first place would have gotten him shit-canned instantly.


    I'll never forget an incident I read about a few years ago. A young
    woman who had been hired to edit an article in the publication she
    worked for was sitting with her boss, another woman, and going over the >edits she had made. The boss made a few comments on this and that and
    then said, by the way, her junior editor has missed a typo and would she >please correct it. The younger woman was puzzled and asked what typo she
    had missed. "You spelled "hampster" with a 'p' but it's supposed to be >spelled "hamster". The young woman protested. "But it's supposed to be >spelled with a 'p'!". The older woman pulled up a dictionary and said
    "Let's see what the dictionary says.... Here it is: "hamster", no 'p'".
    But rather than gracefully admitting her error and making the
    correction, the younger woman *insisted* on spelling it "hampster". When
    her boss said that was unacceptable, the younger woman phoned her mother
    at work and demanded that the mother persuade her boss to let the
    misspelled word remain misspelled - and the mother proceeded to argue
    with the boss.

    Yeah, I can't imagine anyone doing this. They've clearly led a very
    sheltered life. I would even doubt if she had been to college as I
    would expect that to help her understand how things work in the world
    outside of her bubble.

    This struck me as one of the looniest things I'd ever heard. The whole
    idea of calling your parents over such a matter - and then the parents >actually trying to intercede with your boss - is beyond ludicrous
    especially when they'd already established that "hampster" is NOT
    spelled with a 'p'. This young woman literally wanted her private >misspelling of a well-known word to take precedence over the correct >spelling and actually played the parent card in an attempt to have her way.

    After reading about that incident, I'm fully prepared to believe that
    some people bring their parents to job interviews. I'll be darned if I
    can understand why anyone would hire someone who did that though. The
    very fact that they did so seems like clear proof that the candidate
    isn't mature enough to be employed.

    I would more likely expect someone like that would be more likely to
    end up in the family business.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From anim8rfsk@anim8rfsk@cox.net to rec.arts.tv,alt.tv.talkshows.daytime on Fri Nov 21 21:55:27 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
    On Nov 21, 2025 at 9:51:04 AM PST, "Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

    Maureen Callahan is joined by The Nerve’s producer Marlaina Schiavo to
    discuss the changing workplace culture that caters to the sensitivities of >> young employee and a new report on how the majority of Gen Zers bring parents

    with them on job interviews.

    Why would that even be allowed? When I sat on the recruitment panel for new hires in my agency, we would never have allowed some guy's mom to sit in on the interview with him. And, honestly, the fact that he even brought her in the first place would have gotten him shit-canned instantly.


    I’ve had people come in accompanied by a family member, but they tended to
    be young (high school or college) girls looking for an internship. In fact,
    I hired one of them. Her sister always brought her to work. I don’t think
    she ever did learn to drive. We got her into Cal Arts and then the
    Hollywood animation system.
    --
    The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ubiquitous@weberm@polaris.net to alt.tv.talkshows.daytime,rec.arts.tv on Sat Nov 22 00:43:16 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-11-21 3:47 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
    On Nov 21, 2025 at 9:51:04 AM PST, "Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

    Maureen Callahan is joined by The Nerve’s producer Marlaina Schiavo to >>> discuss the changing workplace culture that caters to the sensitivities >>> of young employee and a new report on how the majority of Gen Zers bring >>> parents with them on job interviews.

    Why would that even be allowed? When I sat on the recruitment panel for new >> hires in my agency, we would never have allowed some guy's mom to sit in on >> the interview with him. And, honestly, the fact that he even brought her in >> the first place would have gotten him shit-canned instantly.

    I'll never forget an incident I read about a few years ago. A young
    woman who had been hired to edit an article in the publication she
    worked for was sitting with her boss, another woman, and going over the >edits she had made. The boss made a few comments on this and that and
    then said, by the way, her junior editor has missed a typo and would she >please correct it. The younger woman was puzzled and asked what typo she
    had missed. "You spelled "hampster" with a 'p' but it's supposed to be >spelled "hamster". The young woman protested. "But it's supposed to be >spelled with a 'p'!". The older woman pulled up a dictionary and said
    "Let's see what the dictionary says.... Here it is: "hamster", no 'p'".
    But rather than gracefully admitting her error and making the
    correction, the younger woman *insisted* on spelling it "hampster". When
    her boss said that was unacceptable, the younger woman phoned her mother
    at work and demanded that the mother persuade her boss to let the
    misspelled word remain misspelled - and the mother proceeded to argue
    with the boss.

    This struck me as one of the looniest things I'd ever heard. The whole
    idea of calling your parents over such a matter - and then the parents >actually trying to intercede with your boss - is beyond ludicrous
    especially when they'd already established that "hampster" is NOT
    spelled with a 'p'. This young woman literally wanted her private >misspelling of a well-known word to take precedence over the correct >spelling and actually played the parent card in an attempt to have her way.

    I am confused. Of course, "hampster" is spelled with a "p"!
    --
    Democrats and the liberal media hate President Trump more than they
    love this country.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2