A woman was beaten up by her boyfriend so severely she had to one taken to the >emergency room. In a private text to a female friend of hers, she used the >word 'faggot' in reference to the man who beat her up as an insult.
The 'friend' rats her out to the cops for using the no-no word and the woman >is arrested and convicted of a hate crime. Meanwhile, the man who put her in >the hospital (who isn't even gay) was essentially ignored by the police. No >arrest, no trial, no conviction. Nothing.
Great Britain, ladies and gentlemen!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5G-fn471fIk
A woman was beaten up by her boyfriend so severely she had to one taken to the
emergency room. In a private text to a female friend of hers, she used the word 'faggot' in reference to the man who beat her up as an insult.
The 'friend' rats her out to the cops for using the no-no word and the woman is arrested and convicted of a hate crime. Meanwhile, the man who put her in the hospital (who isn't even gay) was essentially ignored by the police. No arrest, no trial, no conviction. Nothing.
Great Britain, ladies and gentlemen!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5G-fn471fIk
On 11/27/2025 1:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
A woman was beaten up by her boyfriend so severely she had to one taken to >> the
emergency room. In a private text to a female friend of hers, she used the >> word 'faggot' in reference to the man who beat her up as an insult.
The 'friend' rats her out to the cops for using the no-no word and the woman
is arrested and convicted of a hate crime. Meanwhile, the man who put her in
the hospital (who isn't even gay) was essentially ignored by the police. No >> arrest, no trial, no conviction. Nothing.
Great Britain, ladies and gentlemen!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5G-fn471fIk
1. In rubbernecking such transgressions, it's often helpful to replace
the offending word , 'faggot', with a firmly established one, 'nigger'.
2. It seems that 'private', above, may means something different from my understanding of it.
A woman was beaten up by her boyfriend so severely she had to one taken to the
emergency room. In a private text to a female friend of hers, she used the word 'faggot' in reference to the man who beat her up as an insult.
The 'friend' rats her out to the cops for using the no-no word and the woman is arrested and convicted of a hate crime. Meanwhile, the man who put her in the hospital (who isn't even gay) was essentially ignored by the police. No arrest, no trial, no conviction. Nothing.
Great Britain, ladies and gentlemen!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5G-fn471fIk
On Nov 27, 2025 at 7:19:58 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 11/27/2025 1:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
A woman was beaten up by her boyfriend so severely she had to one taken to >>> the
emergency room. In a private text to a female friend of hers, she used the >>> word 'faggot' in reference to the man who beat her up as an insult.
The 'friend' rats her out to the cops for using the no-no word and the woman
is arrested and convicted of a hate crime. Meanwhile, the man who put her in
the hospital (who isn't even gay) was essentially ignored by the police. No
arrest, no trial, no conviction. Nothing.
Great Britain, ladies and gentlemen!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5G-fn471fIk
1. In rubbernecking such transgressions, it's often helpful to replace
the offending word , 'faggot', with a firmly established one, 'nigger'.
And? The idea that one can't use *any* word in a private conversation, either >in a text or in one's home, without incurring criminal liability is, to put it >bluntly, fucking absurd.
2. It seems that 'private', above, may means something different from my
understanding of it.
Well, it wasn't a group text and it wasn't posted in public on any platform >like exTwitter or Facebook. The only way anyone would have known about it was >the 'friend' disclosing it to the police. Sounds like the way 'private' is >used here is no great mystery; it's the same as its commonly understood in the >wider English-speaking world.
A woman was beaten up by her boyfriend so severely she had to one taken to the >emergency room. In a private text to a female friend of hers, she used the >word 'faggot' in reference to the man who beat her up as an insult.
The 'friend' rats her out to the cops for using the no-no word and the woman >is arrested and convicted of a hate crime. Meanwhile, the man who put her in >the hospital (who isn't even gay) was essentially ignored by the police. No >arrest, no trial, no conviction. Nothing.
Great Britain, ladies and gentlemen!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5G-fn471fIk
On 11/27/2025 1:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
A woman was beaten up by her boyfriend so severely she had to one taken to the
emergency room. In a private text to a female friend of hers, she used the >> word 'faggot' in reference to the man who beat her up as an insult.
The 'friend' rats her out to the cops for using the no-no word and the woman >> is arrested and convicted of a hate crime. Meanwhile, the man who put her in >> the hospital (who isn't even gay) was essentially ignored by the police. No >> arrest, no trial, no conviction. Nothing.
Great Britain, ladies and gentlemen!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5G-fn471fIk
1. In rubbernecking such transgressions, it's often helpful to replace
the offending word , 'faggot', with a firmly established one, 'nigger'.
2. It seems that 'private', above, may means something different from my >understanding of it.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
On Nov 27, 2025 at 7:19:58 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 11/27/2025 1:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
A woman was beaten up by her boyfriend so severely she had to one taken to
the
emergency room. In a private text to a female friend of hers, she used the
word 'faggot' in reference to the man who beat her up as an insult.
The 'friend' rats her out to the cops for using the no-no word and the woman
is arrested and convicted of a hate crime. Meanwhile, the man who put her in
the hospital (who isn't even gay) was essentially ignored by the police. No
arrest, no trial, no conviction. Nothing.
Great Britain, ladies and gentlemen!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5G-fn471fIk
1. In rubbernecking such transgressions, it's often helpful to replace
the offending word , 'faggot', with a firmly established one, 'nigger'.
And? The idea that one can't use *any* word in a private conversation, either >>in a text or in one's home, without incurring criminal liability is, to put it
bluntly, fucking absurd.
2. It seems that 'private', above, may means something different from my >>> understanding of it.
Well, it wasn't a group text and it wasn't posted in public on any platform >>like exTwitter or Facebook. The only way anyone would have known about it was >>the 'friend' disclosing it to the police. Sounds like the way 'private' is >>used here is no great mystery; it's the same as its commonly understood in the
wider English-speaking world.
Way to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. moviePig has already won.
He has the world he's always wanted. Just do a celebration dance.
There's no need to contribute further STOOPID.
btw, if she'd called him the attacker, the perpetrator, the criminal...
all that is unlawful hate speech too. Any of it could make the, er, man >involved in the incident feel like he might have done something wrong by >causing harm, making him feel bad.
Congratulations, moviePig. This is a complete victory for you.
On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 18:56:48 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:
A woman was beaten up by her boyfriend so severely she had to one taken to the
emergency room. In a private text to a female friend of hers, she used the >> word 'faggot' in reference to the man who beat her up as an insult.
The 'friend' rats her out to the cops for using the no-no word and the woman >> is arrested and convicted of a hate crime. Meanwhile, the man who put her in >> the hospital (who isn't even gay) was essentially ignored by the police. No >> arrest, no trial, no conviction. Nothing.
Great Britain, ladies and gentlemen!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5G-fn471fIk
Words are worse than actions apparently.
A woman was beaten up by her boyfriend so severely she had to one taken to the
emergency room. In a private text to a female friend of hers, she used the word 'faggot' in reference to the man who beat her up as an insult.
The 'friend' rats her out to the cops for using the no-no word and the woman is arrested and convicted of a hate crime. Meanwhile, the man who put her in the hospital (who isn't even gay) was essentially ignored by the police. No arrest, no trial, no conviction. Nothing.
Great Britain, ladies and gentlemen!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5G-fn471fIk
Words are worse than actions apparently.
A friend included the phrase "I'm a fag" in a voicemail
and my iphone redacted it into "I'm a ****" as the text
interpretation.
On 11/27/25 10:56 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
A woman was beaten up by her boyfriend so severely she had to one taken to the
emergency room. In a private text to a female friend of hers, she used the >> word 'faggot' in reference to the man who beat her up as an insult.
The 'friend' rats her out to the cops for using the no-no word and the woman >> is arrested and convicted of a hate crime. Meanwhile, the man who put her in >> the hospital (who isn't even gay) was essentially ignored by the police. No >> arrest, no trial, no conviction. Nothing.
Great Britain, ladies and gentlemen!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5G-fn471fIk
From the comments:
The US should seriously consider enacting sanctions against Great
Britain for human rights abuses
On 11/28/25 7:07 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 18:56:48 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:
A woman was beaten up by her boyfriend so severely she had to one taken to >>> the
emergency room. In a private text to a female friend of hers, she used the >>> word 'faggot' in reference to the man who beat her up as an insult.
The 'friend' rats her out to the cops for using the no-no word and the woman
is arrested and convicted of a hate crime. Meanwhile, the man who put her in
the hospital (who isn't even gay) was essentially ignored by the police. No
arrest, no trial, no conviction. Nothing.
Great Britain, ladies and gentlemen!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5G-fn471fIk
Words are worse than actions apparently.
A friend included the phrase "I'm a fag" in a voicemail
and my iphone redacted it into "I'm a ****" as the text
interpretation.
On Nov 29, 2025 at 7:55:01 PM PST, "Pluted Pup" <plutedpup@outlook.com> wrote:
On 11/28/25 7:07 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 18:56:48 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:
A woman was beaten up by her boyfriend so severely she had to one taken to >>>> the
emergency room. In a private text to a female friend of hers, she used the >>>> word 'faggot' in reference to the man who beat her up as an insult.
The 'friend' rats her out to the cops for using the no-no word and the woman
is arrested and convicted of a hate crime. Meanwhile, the man who put her in
the hospital (who isn't even gay) was essentially ignored by the police. No
arrest, no trial, no conviction. Nothing.
Great Britain, ladies and gentlemen!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5G-fn471fIk
Words are worse than actions apparently.
A friend included the phrase "I'm a fag" in a voicemail
and my iphone redacted it into "I'm a ****" as the text
interpretation.
The Siri word predictor in iMessage on the iPhone won't fill in politically incorrect words for you, e.g., the word 'suicide'. Even when you manually type
all the way to the last letter-- suicid-- it will not put 'suicide' in the choices of predicted words for you to choose from. There's a whole list of words that Apple has deemed no-no words that will not populate in the iMessage
text predictor.
On 2025-11-30 04:00:25 +0000, Pluted Pup said:
On 11/27/25 10:56 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
A woman was beaten up by her boyfriend so severely she had to one taken to >>> the
emergency room. In a private text to a female friend of hers, she used the >>> word 'faggot' in reference to the man who beat her up as an insult.
The 'friend' rats her out to the cops for using the no-no word and the woman
is arrested and convicted of a hate crime. Meanwhile, the man who put her in
the hospital (who isn't even gay) was essentially ignored by the police. No
arrest, no trial, no conviction. Nothing.
Great Britain, ladies and gentlemen!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5G-fn471fIk
From the comments:
The US should seriously consider enacting sanctions against Great
Britain for human rights abuses
Apparently the trumpnuts have been forced to look to England for
anecdotes of their white male grievance, Dear Leader has become so
unpopular at home.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
On Nov 29, 2025 at 7:55:01 PM PST, "Pluted Pup" <plutedpup@outlook.com>
wrote:
On 11/28/25 7:07 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 18:56:48 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:
A woman was beaten up by her boyfriend so severely she had to one taken to
the
emergency room. In a private text to a female friend of hers, she used the
word 'faggot' in reference to the man who beat her up as an insult. >>>>>
The 'friend' rats her out to the cops for using the no-no word and the woman
is arrested and convicted of a hate crime. Meanwhile, the man who put her in
the hospital (who isn't even gay) was essentially ignored by the police. No
arrest, no trial, no conviction. Nothing.
Great Britain, ladies and gentlemen!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5G-fn471fIk
Words are worse than actions apparently.
A friend included the phrase "I'm a fag" in a voicemail
and my iphone redacted it into "I'm a ****" as the text
interpretation.
The Siri word predictor in iMessage on the iPhone won't fill in politically >> incorrect words for you, e.g., the word 'suicide'. Even when you manually >> type
all the way to the last letter-- suicid-- it will not put 'suicide' in the >> choices of predicted words for you to choose from. There's a whole list of >> words that Apple has deemed no-no words that will not populate in the
iMessage
text predictor.
I just tried it. I got as far as SUIC and it predicted “suicidal“ and let me finish “suicide“ no problem.
Nov 29, 2025 9:21:53 PM PST, super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid>:
. . .
Apparently the trumpnuts have been forced to look to England for
anecdotes of their white male grievance, Dear Leader has become so >>unpopular at home.
Ever hear of a canary in a coal mine?
All of the oppression and lunacy of the leftist governments of Europe-- >especially the UK-- are a precursor to what they'll try here if given
the chance. We're usually about six months to a year behind them.
Thankfully, here their crap mostly runs into the brick wall of the 1st >Amendment which won't allow the government to do the things they do in >Europe. The idea that one could be arrested for using a bad word in a >private conversation (or even out in public) is so absurd we don't even
think about it here. Or that you could be jailed for saying something
that merely hurts someone else's feelings.
But there's no doubt that the radical Left in America would absolutely
impose on us the same sort of Stasi-like environment, along with
two-tier exceptions from those laws for everyone who's protected under
the Diversity Umbrella, if they could.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
Nov 29, 2025 9:21:53 PM PST, super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid>:
. . .
Apparently the trumpnuts have been forced to look to England for
anecdotes of their white male grievance, Dear Leader has become so
unpopular at home.
Ever hear of a canary in a coal mine?
All of the oppression and lunacy of the leftist governments of Europe--
especially the UK-- are a precursor to what they'll try here if given
the chance. We're usually about six months to a year behind them.
Thankfully, here their crap mostly runs into the brick wall of the 1st
Amendment which won't allow the government to do the things they do in
Europe. The idea that one could be arrested for using a bad word in a
private conversation (or even out in public) is so absurd we don't even
think about it here. Or that you could be jailed for saying something
that merely hurts someone else's feelings.
But there's no doubt that the radical Left in America would absolutely
impose on us the same sort of Stasi-like environment, along with
two-tier exceptions from those laws for everyone who's protected under
the Diversity Umbrella, if they could.
Trump's America is without laws, without civil rights. The Constitution
does not exist and John Roberts has yet to rein in any of Trump's
excesses. If anything, he's Trump's biggest enablers.
The January 6th rioters seized the Capitol and never left.
Trump ordered Border Patrol to use violence against protestors, then lie
that the violence was justified because protestors themselves had
committed violence.
Criticize Trump, get prosecuted.
On Nov 30, 2025 at 3:36:16 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
Nov 29, 2025 9:21:53 PM PST, super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid>:
. . .
Apparently the trumpnuts have been forced to look to England for
anecdotes of their white male grievance, Dear Leader has become so
unpopular at home.
Ever hear of a canary in a coal mine?
All of the oppression and lunacy of the leftist governments of Europe--
especially the UK-- are a precursor to what they'll try here if given
the chance. We're usually about six months to a year behind them.
Thankfully, here their crap mostly runs into the brick wall of the 1st
Amendment which won't allow the government to do the things they do in
Europe. The idea that one could be arrested for using a bad word in a
private conversation (or even out in public) is so absurd we don't even
think about it here. Or that you could be jailed for saying something
that merely hurts someone else's feelings.
But there's no doubt that the radical Left in America would absolutely
impose on us the same sort of Stasi-like environment, along with
two-tier exceptions from those laws for everyone who's protected under
the Diversity Umbrella, if they could.
Trump's America is without laws, without civil rights. The Constitution
does not exist and John Roberts has yet to rein in any of Trump's
excesses. If anything, he's Trump's biggest enablers.
The January 6th rioters seized the Capitol and never left.
Trump ordered Border Patrol to use violence against protestors, then lie
that the violence was justified because protestors themselves had
committed violence.
Criticize Trump, get prosecuted.
There are literally millions of people criticizing Trump every day on the >internet and on TV, and every two months there's another of those insipid "no >kings" marches, which couldn't happen at all if it was actually illegal to >criticize Trump.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
Nov 29, 2025 9:21:53 PM PST, super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid>:
. . .
Apparently the trumpnuts have been forced to look to England for >>>anecdotes of their white male grievance, Dear Leader has become so >>>unpopular at home.
Ever hear of a canary in a coal mine?
All of the oppression and lunacy of the leftist governments of Europe-- >>especially the UK-- are a precursor to what they'll try here if given
the chance. We're usually about six months to a year behind them.
Thankfully, here their crap mostly runs into the brick wall of the 1st >>Amendment which won't allow the government to do the things they do in >>Europe. The idea that one could be arrested for using a bad word in a >>private conversation (or even out in public) is so absurd we don't even >>think about it here. Or that you could be jailed for saying something
that merely hurts someone else's feelings.
But there's no doubt that the radical Left in America would absolutely >>impose on us the same sort of Stasi-like environment, along with
two-tier exceptions from those laws for everyone who's protected under
the Diversity Umbrella, if they could.
Trump's America is without laws, without civil rights. The Constitution
does not exist and John Roberts has yet to rein in any of Trump's
excesses. If anything, he's Trump's biggest enablers.
The January 6th rioters seized the Capitol and never left.
Trump ordered Border Patrol to use violence against protestors, then lie
that the violence was justified because protestors themselves had
committed violence.
Criticize Trump, get prosecuted. James Comey's prosecution, merely >temporarily suspended due to the unconstitutional appointment of the >prosecutor, will resume as his indictment has yet to be reversed on the >merits.
These are Americans whose civil rights have been thwarted.
The canary is long dead.
On Nov 30, 2025 at 3:36:16 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
Nov 29, 2025 9:21:53 PM PST, super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid>:
. . .
Apparently the trumpnuts have been forced to look to England for
anecdotes of their white male grievance, Dear Leader has become so
unpopular at home.
Ever hear of a canary in a coal mine?
All of the oppression and lunacy of the leftist governments of Europe--
especially the UK-- are a precursor to what they'll try here if given
the chance. We're usually about six months to a year behind them.
Thankfully, here their crap mostly runs into the brick wall of the 1st
Amendment which won't allow the government to do the things they do in
Europe. The idea that one could be arrested for using a bad word in a
private conversation (or even out in public) is so absurd we don't even
think about it here. Or that you could be jailed for saying something
that merely hurts someone else's feelings.
But there's no doubt that the radical Left in America would absolutely
impose on us the same sort of Stasi-like environment, along with
two-tier exceptions from those laws for everyone who's protected under
the Diversity Umbrella, if they could.
Trump's America is without laws, without civil rights. The Constitution
does not exist and John Roberts has yet to rein in any of Trump's
excesses. If anything, he's Trump's biggest enablers.
The January 6th rioters seized the Capitol and never left.
Trump ordered Border Patrol to use violence against protestors, then lie
that the violence was justified because protestors themselves had
committed violence.
Criticize Trump, get prosecuted.
There are literally millions of people criticizing Trump every day on the >internet and on TV, and every two months there's another of those insipid "no >kings" marches, which couldn't happen at all if it was actually illegal to >criticize Trump.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
On Nov 30, 2025 at 3:36:16 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote: >>
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
Nov 29, 2025 9:21:53 PM PST, super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid>:
. . .
Apparently the trumpnuts have been forced to look to England for
anecdotes of their white male grievance, Dear Leader has become so
unpopular at home.
Ever hear of a canary in a coal mine?
All of the oppression and lunacy of the leftist governments of Europe-- >>>> especially the UK-- are a precursor to what they'll try here if given
the chance. We're usually about six months to a year behind them.
Thankfully, here their crap mostly runs into the brick wall of the 1st >>>> Amendment which won't allow the government to do the things they do in >>>> Europe. The idea that one could be arrested for using a bad word in a >>>> private conversation (or even out in public) is so absurd we don't even >>>> think about it here. Or that you could be jailed for saying something
that merely hurts someone else's feelings.
But there's no doubt that the radical Left in America would absolutely >>>> impose on us the same sort of Stasi-like environment, along with
two-tier exceptions from those laws for everyone who's protected under >>>> the Diversity Umbrella, if they could.
Trump's America is without laws, without civil rights. The Constitution
does not exist and John Roberts has yet to rein in any of Trump's
excesses. If anything, he's Trump's biggest enablers.
The January 6th rioters seized the Capitol and never left.
Trump ordered Border Patrol to use violence against protestors, then lie >>> that the violence was justified because protestors themselves had
committed violence.
Criticize Trump, get prosecuted.
There are literally millions of people criticizing Trump every day on the >>internet and on TV, and every two months there's another of those insipid "no >>kings" marches, which couldn't happen at all if it was actually illegal to >>criticize Trump.
Here's what's going on in the US Attorney's Office, and ours is led by
an actual prosecutor. You tell me that Trump is honoring the
Constitution. Charges get filed based on sworn affidavits of federal law >enforcement officers that cannot be sustained once it becomes clear that
the officer swore falsely.
Have you ever seen anything of the kind that it's no longer routine that
a prosecutor can indict on a sworn statement of a law enforcement
officer?
Full-text copyright infringement follows
Judge's unusual criticism in dropped immigration case is latest strange
twist for US attorney's office
By Jason Meisner
Chicago Tribune
PUBLISHED: November 30, 2025 at 5:00 AM CST UPDATED: November 30, 2025
at 9:23 AM CST
In the four months since U.S. Attorney Andrew Boutros was appointed to
an open-ended term as Chicago's top federal prosecutor, his office has
seen a large turnover in leadership, been buffeted by the government
shutdown and thrown headlong into the controversial Operation Midway
Blitz immigration enforcement mission.
Unusual times to be sure. But then last week, things got even weirder.
After dismissing several criminal cases against protesters of the Trump >administration's aggressive immigration enforcement policies, the U.S. >attorney's office was called to the woodshed in an extraordinary opinion
by a federal magistrate judge that lit up the water cooler talk in legal >circles.
In granting the prosecution's motion to dismiss assault charges against
Dana Briggs, U.S. Magistrate Judge Gabriel Fuentes took the opportunity
to opine more generally on the U.S. attorney's office's role in
prosecuting a number of other immigration-related cases that have since >fallen apart.
Trump's America is without laws, without civil rights. The Constitution
does not exist and John Roberts has yet to rein in any of Trump's
excesses. If anything, he's Trump's biggest enablers.
"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> trolled:"no kings" marches, which couldn't happen at all if it was actually illegal >to criticize Trump.
Trump's America is without laws, without civil rights. The Constitution
does not exist and John Roberts has yet to rein in any of Trump's
excesses. If anything, he's Trump's biggest enablers.
The January 6th rioters seized the Capitol and never left.
Trump ordered Border Patrol to use violence against protestors, then lie
that the violence was justified because protestors themselves had
committed violence.
Criticize Trump, get prosecuted.
There are literally millions of people criticizing Trump every day on the >internet and on TV, and every two months there's another of those insipid
On Nov 29, 2025 at 7:55:01 PM PST, "Pluted Pup" <plutedpup@outlook.com> wrote:
On 11/28/25 7:07 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 18:56:48 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:
A woman was beaten up by her boyfriend so severely she had to one taken to
the
emergency room. In a private text to a female friend of hers, she used the
word 'faggot' in reference to the man who beat her up as an insult.
The 'friend' rats her out to the cops for using the no-no word and the woman
is arrested and convicted of a hate crime. Meanwhile, the man who put her in
the hospital (who isn't even gay) was essentially ignored by the police. No
arrest, no trial, no conviction. Nothing.
Great Britain, ladies and gentlemen!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5G-fn471fIk
Words are worse than actions apparently.
A friend included the phrase "I'm a fag" in a voicemail
and my iphone redacted it into "I'm a ****" as the text
interpretation.
The Siri word predictor in iMessage on the iPhone won't fill in politically incorrect words for you, e.g., the word 'suicide'. Even when you manually type
all the way to the last letter-- suicid-- it will not put 'suicide' in the choices of predicted words for you to choose from. There's a whole list of words that Apple has deemed no-no words that will not populate in the iMessage
text predictor.
On 11/30/25 12:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Nov 29, 2025 at 7:55:01 PM PST, "Pluted Pup" <plutedpup@outlook.com>
wrote:
On 11/28/25 7:07 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 18:56:48 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> >>>> wrote:
A woman was beaten up by her boyfriend so severely she had to one taken to
the
emergency room. In a private text to a female friend of hers, she used the
word 'faggot' in reference to the man who beat her up as an insult. >>>>>
The 'friend' rats her out to the cops for using the no-no word and the woman
is arrested and convicted of a hate crime. Meanwhile, the man who put her in
the hospital (who isn't even gay) was essentially ignored by the police. No
arrest, no trial, no conviction. Nothing.
Great Britain, ladies and gentlemen!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5G-fn471fIk
Words are worse than actions apparently.
A friend included the phrase "I'm a fag" in a voicemail
and my iphone redacted it into "I'm a ****" as the text
interpretation.
The Siri word predictor in iMessage on the iPhone won't fill in politically >> incorrect words for you, e.g., the word 'suicide'. Even when you manually type
all the way to the last letter-- suicid-- it will not put 'suicide' in the >> choices of predicted words for you to choose from. There's a whole list of >> words that Apple has deemed no-no words that will not populate in the iMessage
text predictor.
An equivalent would be if "suicide" were replaced with "****".
So a cry for help might start as:
"I feel like committing ****"
answered with:
"Me too, let's get together and do ****"
"****" or "****"?
"Yes!"
On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 18:56:48 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:
A woman was beaten up by her boyfriend so severely she had to one taken to the
emergency room. In a private text to a female friend of hers, she used the >>word 'faggot' in reference to the man who beat her up as an insult.
The 'friend' rats her out to the cops for using the no-no word and the woman >>is arrested and convicted of a hate crime. Meanwhile, the man who put her in >>the hospital (who isn't even gay) was essentially ignored by the police. No >>arrest, no trial, no conviction. Nothing.
Great Britain, ladies and gentlemen!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5G-fn471fIk
Words are worse than actions apparently.
On Nov 29, 2025 at 9:21:53 PM PST, "super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> >wrote:
On 2025-11-30 04:00:25 +0000, Pluted Pup said:
On 11/27/25 10:56 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
A woman was beaten up by her boyfriend so severely she had to one taken to
Apparently the trumpnuts have been forced to look to England for
anecdotes of their white male grievance, Dear Leader has become so
unpopular at home.
Ever hear of a canary in a coal mine?
All of the oppression and lunacy of the leftist governments of Europe-- >especially the UK-- are a precursor to what they'll try here if given the >chance. We're usually about six months to a year behind them.
Thankfully, here their crap mostly runs into the brick wall of the 1st >Amendment which won't allow the government to do the things they do in Europe. >The idea that one could be arrested for using a bad word in a private >conversation (or even out in public) is so absurd we don't even think about it >here. Or that you could be jailed for saying something that merely hurts >someone else's feelings.
But there's no doubt that the radical Left in America would absolutely impose >on us the same sort of Stasi-like environment, along with two-tier exceptions >from those laws for everyone who's protected under the Diversity Umbrella, if >they could.
On Sun, 30 Nov 2025 23:14:04 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:
On Nov 29, 2025 at 9:21:53 PM PST, "super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid>
wrote:
On 2025-11-30 04:00:25 +0000, Pluted Pup said:
On 11/27/25 10:56 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
A woman was beaten up by her boyfriend so severely she had to one taken to
Apparently the trumpnuts have been forced to look to England for
anecdotes of their white male grievance, Dear Leader has become so
unpopular at home.
Ever hear of a canary in a coal mine?
All of the oppression and lunacy of the leftist governments of Europe--
especially the UK-- are a precursor to what they'll try here if given the
chance. We're usually about six months to a year behind them.
Thankfully, here their crap mostly runs into the brick wall of the 1st
Amendment which won't allow the government to do the things they do in
Europe.
The idea that one could be arrested for using a bad word in a private
conversation (or even out in public) is so absurd we don't even think about >> it
here. Or that you could be jailed for saying something that merely hurts
someone else's feelings.
Oh? Anybody here NOT heard of Lucy Connolly in the UK?
| Sysop: | Scott |
|---|---|
| Location: | Freeburg, IL, USA, Earth |
| Users: | 4 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 246:04:56 |
| Calls: | 4 |
| Messages: | 14,713 |