On Fri, 5 Dec 2025 21:54:32 -0000 (UTC), Marmalade King
<x@y.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<10gvkao$1qnau$1@dont-email.me> wrote:
The Trump administration says its proposal to roll back vehicle fuel
economy standards, announced officially in the Oval Office on Wednesday, is >> an attempt to shave dollars off the ballooning cost of new cars in the US.
The purpose of fuel standards is to force the public to buy
EV by eliminating the choice to buy a gasoline powered
vehicle. That is the only way EV's will be generally
accepted because the sales figures make it obvious few want
them now.
On 06/12/2025 13:24, Attila wrote:
On Fri, 5 Dec 2025 21:54:32 -0000 (UTC), Marmalade King
<x@y.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<10gvkao$1qnau$1@dont-email.me> wrote:
The Trump administration says its proposal to roll back vehicle fuelThe purpose of fuel standards is to force the public to buy
economy standards, announced officially in the Oval Office on Wednesday, is >>> an attempt to shave dollars off the ballooning cost of new cars in the US. >>
EV by eliminating the choice to buy a gasoline powered
vehicle. That is the only way EV's will be generally
accepted because the sales figures make it obvious few want
them now.
We don't want EVs in the UK either!
A chum in Australia has told me of 'Filling Stations' in the Outback--
which have to run diesel generators to supply electricity to charge EVs.
On Sun, 07 Dec 2025 03:15:37 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com>vehicle
wrote:
Collectivists_Always_Fail <MeanDog@stonewall.Dash> wrote in >>news:dgg9jkt30odtf3lmecdbn35o40vqmkjuga@4ax.com:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2025 16:49:05 -0700, Skeeter <invalid@none.com> wrote:
In article <10h2alj$2vjp1$3@dont-email.me>, bax02 >>>>_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Petro Lomonosov <bubbles@in.valid> wrote in
news:20251206103743.0d592a6f@z-z:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2025 17:28:18 -0000 (UTC)
Webbster <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote in
news:jeb8jk1hjaoam47lohikt4lpllg2qso65i@4ax.com:
On Fri, 5 Dec 2025 21:54:32 -0000 (UTC), Marmalade King
<x@y.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<10gvkao$1qnau$1@dont-email.me> wrote:
The Trump administration says its proposal to roll back
Officefuel economy standards, announced officially in the Oval
ballooningon Wednesday, is an attempt to shave dollars off the
hadcost of new cars in the US.
The purpose of fuel standards is to force the public to buy
EV by eliminating the choice to buy a gasoline powered
vehicle. That is the only way EV's will be generally
accepted because the sales figures make it obvious few want
them now.
When automobiles first started, EV's were very popular - and it
was the fuel companies that forced them out.
Like they did to steam cars?
You are a laughable dolt.
There were NO viable charging stations and lead acid batteries
gearabout a 20 mile range. Urban only - no long trips.================
AI Overview
Electric Vehicles Had Their First Golden Age In The Early 1900s
The early days of electric cars (roughly 1890s-1910s) saw them
thrive as quiet, clean urban vehicles, even outselling gasoline
cars briefly, with pioneers like William Morrison and Thomas
Parker creating early models, but they faded due to the Model T's
affordability and limited range, only to resurface with modern
battery tech centuries later.
Decline & Resurgence
Henry Ford's Impact: The assembly line made gasoline cars cheap,
while longer ranges and electric starters for gas cars challenged
EVs' advantages. Fading Out: By 1914-1935, sales plummeted,
relegating EVs to niche uses like golf carts.
AI Overview
Early electric cars were surprisingly popular, dominating city
transport and making up about a third of all vehicles on U.S. roads
around 1900 due to their quietness, ease of use (no cranking or
dwellersshifting), and lack of fumes, especially appealing to urban
cheaperand women, but their reign ended with the mass production of
gasoline cars like the Ford Model T, making them a niche product by
the 1920s.
==========
BTW, even today the majority of miles driven are in urban
environments
Gas. Deal with it. We have lots of it. More than Lithium
even.
I'm real happy with my big full size pickup and it's V8 engine. She's
a bit of a gas hog, but there are gas stations everywhere.
Gas stations' long decline
Jul 15, 2022
The number of gas stations has been
in steady decline for decades, and
the volatility in gas prices — along
with the rising popularity of electric
vehicles — will squeeze them even further. >>https://www.axios.com/2022/07/15/gas-stations-prices-closing
<EYEROLL> There's still too many gas stations. Often they'll be a
couple right acrosss the street each other, sometimes there will be
three at major intersections, and four or five at interstate and other
super highway exits.
I'm planning a couple of long trips for next summer and unlike EV
drivers, I won't give a moments thought to checking for gas/recharge stations.
Collectivists_Always_Fail <MeanDog@stonewall.Dash> wrote in >news:vj8ajk1obqorjpi35601loagodcrl06s98@4ax.com:
On Sun, 07 Dec 2025 03:15:37 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com>vehicle
wrote:
Collectivists_Always_Fail <MeanDog@stonewall.Dash> wrote in >>>news:dgg9jkt30odtf3lmecdbn35o40vqmkjuga@4ax.com:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2025 16:49:05 -0700, Skeeter <invalid@none.com> wrote:
In article <10h2alj$2vjp1$3@dont-email.me>, bax02 >>>>>_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Petro Lomonosov <bubbles@in.valid> wrote in
news:20251206103743.0d592a6f@z-z:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2025 17:28:18 -0000 (UTC)
Webbster <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote in
news:jeb8jk1hjaoam47lohikt4lpllg2qso65i@4ax.com:
On Fri, 5 Dec 2025 21:54:32 -0000 (UTC), Marmalade King
<x@y.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<10gvkao$1qnau$1@dont-email.me> wrote:
The Trump administration says its proposal to roll back
Officefuel economy standards, announced officially in the Oval
ballooningon Wednesday, is an attempt to shave dollars off the
hadcost of new cars in the US.
The purpose of fuel standards is to force the public to buy
EV by eliminating the choice to buy a gasoline powered
vehicle. That is the only way EV's will be generally
accepted because the sales figures make it obvious few want
them now.
When automobiles first started, EV's were very popular - and it >>>>>> >> was the fuel companies that forced them out.
Like they did to steam cars?
You are a laughable dolt.
There were NO viable charging stations and lead acid batteries
gearabout a 20 mile range. Urban only - no long trips.================
AI Overview
Electric Vehicles Had Their First Golden Age In The Early 1900s
The early days of electric cars (roughly 1890s-1910s) saw them
thrive as quiet, clean urban vehicles, even outselling gasoline
cars briefly, with pioneers like William Morrison and Thomas
Parker creating early models, but they faded due to the Model T's >>>>>> > affordability and limited range, only to resurface with modern
battery tech centuries later.
Decline & Resurgence
Henry Ford's Impact: The assembly line made gasoline cars cheap, >>>>>> > while longer ranges and electric starters for gas cars challenged >>>>>> > EVs' advantages. Fading Out: By 1914-1935, sales plummeted,
relegating EVs to niche uses like golf carts.
AI Overview
Early electric cars were surprisingly popular, dominating city
transport and making up about a third of all vehicles on U.S. roads >>>>>> around 1900 due to their quietness, ease of use (no cranking or
dwellersshifting), and lack of fumes, especially appealing to urban
cheaperand women, but their reign ended with the mass production of
gasoline cars like the Ford Model T, making them a niche product by >>>>>> the 1920s.
==========
BTW, even today the majority of miles driven are in urban
environments
Gas. Deal with it. We have lots of it. More than Lithium
even.
I'm real happy with my big full size pickup and it's V8 engine. She's
a bit of a gas hog, but there are gas stations everywhere.
Gas stations' long decline
Jul 15, 2022
The number of gas stations has been
in steady decline for decades, and
the volatility in gas prices — along
with the rising popularity of electric
vehicles — will squeeze them even further. >>>https://www.axios.com/2022/07/15/gas-stations-prices-closing
<EYEROLL> There's still too many gas stations. Often they'll be a
couple right acrosss the street each other, sometimes there will be
three at major intersections, and four or five at interstate and other
super highway exits.
I'm planning a couple of long trips for next summer and unlike EV
drivers, I won't give a moments thought to checking for gas/recharge
stations.
1) Recharge places are everywhere.
2) You 5 minute full tank costs $50,
my 20 minute recharge cost me $6.
I will take that tradeoff any day.....
Collectivists_Always_Fail <MeanDog@stonewall.Dash> wrote in news:vj8ajk1obqorjpi35601loagodcrl06s98@4ax.com:
On Sun, 07 Dec 2025 03:15:37 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:
vehicleCollectivists_Always_Fail <MeanDog@stonewall.Dash> wrote in >>news:dgg9jkt30odtf3lmecdbn35o40vqmkjuga@4ax.com:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2025 16:49:05 -0700, Skeeter <invalid@none.com> wrote:
In article <10h2alj$2vjp1$3@dont-email.me>, bax02 >>>>_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Petro Lomonosov <bubbles@in.valid> wrote in
news:20251206103743.0d592a6f@z-z:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2025 17:28:18 -0000 (UTC)
Webbster <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote in
news:jeb8jk1hjaoam47lohikt4lpllg2qso65i@4ax.com:
On Fri, 5 Dec 2025 21:54:32 -0000 (UTC), Marmalade King
<x@y.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<10gvkao$1qnau$1@dont-email.me> wrote:
The Trump administration says its proposal to roll back
Officefuel economy standards, announced officially in the Oval
ballooningon Wednesday, is an attempt to shave dollars off the
hadcost of new cars in the US.
The purpose of fuel standards is to force the public to buy
EV by eliminating the choice to buy a gasoline powered
vehicle. That is the only way EV's will be generally
accepted because the sales figures make it obvious few want
them now.
When automobiles first started, EV's were very popular - and it >>>>> >> was the fuel companies that forced them out.
Like they did to steam cars?
You are a laughable dolt.
There were NO viable charging stations and lead acid batteries
gearabout a 20 mile range. Urban only - no long trips.================
AI Overview
Electric Vehicles Had Their First Golden Age In The Early 1900s
The early days of electric cars (roughly 1890s-1910s) saw them
thrive as quiet, clean urban vehicles, even outselling gasoline
cars briefly, with pioneers like William Morrison and Thomas
Parker creating early models, but they faded due to the Model T's >>>>> > affordability and limited range, only to resurface with modern
battery tech centuries later.
Decline & Resurgence
Henry Ford's Impact: The assembly line made gasoline cars cheap, >>>>> > while longer ranges and electric starters for gas cars challenged >>>>> > EVs' advantages. Fading Out: By 1914-1935, sales plummeted,
relegating EVs to niche uses like golf carts.
AI Overview
Early electric cars were surprisingly popular, dominating city
transport and making up about a third of all vehicles on U.S. roads >>>>> around 1900 due to their quietness, ease of use (no cranking or
dwellersshifting), and lack of fumes, especially appealing to urban
cheaperand women, but their reign ended with the mass production of
gasoline cars like the Ford Model T, making them a niche product by >>>>> the 1920s.
==========
BTW, even today the majority of miles driven are in urban
environments
Gas. Deal with it. We have lots of it. More than Lithium
even.
I'm real happy with my big full size pickup and it's V8 engine. She's
a bit of a gas hog, but there are gas stations everywhere.
Gas stations' long decline
Jul 15, 2022
The number of gas stations has been
in steady decline for decades, and
the volatility in gas prices ? along
with the rising popularity of electric
vehicles ? will squeeze them even further. >>https://www.axios.com/2022/07/15/gas-stations-prices-closing
<EYEROLL> There's still too many gas stations. Often they'll be a
couple right acrosss the street each other, sometimes there will be
three at major intersections, and four or five at interstate and other super highway exits.
I'm planning a couple of long trips for next summer and unlike EV
drivers, I won't give a moments thought to checking for gas/recharge stations.
1) Recharge places are everywhere.
2) You 5 minute full tank costs $50,
my 20 minute recharge cost me $6.
I will take that tradeoff any day.....
1) Recharge places are everywhere.
2) You 5 minute full tank costs $50,
my 20 minute recharge cost me $6.
I will take that tradeoff any day.....
In article <XnsB3AE533143B96629555@185.151.15.190>,T's
noemail@aol.com says...
Collectivists_Always_Fail <MeanDog@stonewall.Dash> wrote in
news:vj8ajk1obqorjpi35601loagodcrl06s98@4ax.com:
On Sun, 07 Dec 2025 03:15:37 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com>vehicle
wrote:
Collectivists_Always_Fail <MeanDog@stonewall.Dash> wrote in
news:dgg9jkt30odtf3lmecdbn35o40vqmkjuga@4ax.com:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2025 16:49:05 -0700, Skeeter <invalid@none.com> wrote:
In article <10h2alj$2vjp1$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Petro Lomonosov <bubbles@in.valid> wrote in
news:20251206103743.0d592a6f@z-z:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2025 17:28:18 -0000 (UTC)
Webbster <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote in
news:jeb8jk1hjaoam47lohikt4lpllg2qso65i@4ax.com:
On Fri, 5 Dec 2025 21:54:32 -0000 (UTC), Marmalade King
<x@y.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<10gvkao$1qnau$1@dont-email.me> wrote:
The Trump administration says its proposal to roll back
Officefuel economy standards, announced officially in the Oval
ballooningon Wednesday, is an attempt to shave dollars off the
hadcost of new cars in the US.
The purpose of fuel standards is to force the public to buy
EV by eliminating the choice to buy a gasoline powered
vehicle. That is the only way EV's will be generally
accepted because the sales figures make it obvious few want
them now.
When automobiles first started, EV's were very popular - and it
was the fuel companies that forced them out.
Like they did to steam cars?
You are a laughable dolt.
There were NO viable charging stations and lead acid batteries
about a 20 mile range. Urban only - no long trips.
AI Overview
Electric Vehicles Had Their First Golden Age In The Early 1900s
The early days of electric cars (roughly 1890s-1910s) saw them
thrive as quiet, clean urban vehicles, even outselling gasoline
cars briefly, with pioneers like William Morrison and Thomas
Parker creating early models, but they faded due to the Model
challengedaffordability and limited range, only to resurface with modern
battery tech centuries later.
Decline & Resurgence
Henry Ford's Impact: The assembly line made gasoline cars cheap,
while longer ranges and electric starters for gas cars
roadsEVs' advantages. Fading Out: By 1914-1935, sales plummeted,================
relegating EVs to niche uses like golf carts.
AI Overview
Early electric cars were surprisingly popular, dominating city
transport and making up about a third of all vehicles on U.S.
bygeararound 1900 due to their quietness, ease of use (no cranking or
dwellersshifting), and lack of fumes, especially appealing to urban
cheaperand women, but their reign ended with the mass production of
gasoline cars like the Ford Model T, making them a niche product
She'sthe 1920s.
==========
BTW, even today the majority of miles driven are in urban
environments
Gas. Deal with it. We have lots of it. More than Lithium
even.
I'm real happy with my big full size pickup and it's V8 engine.
a bit of a gas hog, but there are gas stations everywhere.
Gas stations' long decline
Jul 15, 2022
The number of gas stations has been
in steady decline for decades, and
the volatility in gas prices ? along
with the rising popularity of electric
vehicles ? will squeeze them even further.
https://www.axios.com/2022/07/15/gas-stations-prices-closing
<EYEROLL> There's still too many gas stations. Often they'll be a
couple right acrosss the street each other, sometimes there will be
three at major intersections, and four or five at interstate and other
super highway exits.
I'm planning a couple of long trips for next summer and unlike EV
drivers, I won't give a moments thought to checking for gas/recharge
stations.
1) Recharge places are everywhere.
2) You 5 minute full tank costs $50,
my 20 minute recharge cost me $6.
I will take that tradeoff any day.....
There are not recharge places everywhere and 1/2 of them
don't work.
On Sun, 07 Dec 2025 14:24:39 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com>wrote:
wrote:
Collectivists_Always_Fail <MeanDog@stonewall.Dash> wrote in >>news:vj8ajk1obqorjpi35601loagodcrl06s98@4ax.com:
On Sun, 07 Dec 2025 03:15:37 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com>
wrote:
Collectivists_Always_Fail <MeanDog@stonewall.Dash> wrote in >>>>news:dgg9jkt30odtf3lmecdbn35o40vqmkjuga@4ax.com:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2025 16:49:05 -0700, Skeeter <invalid@none.com>
itvehicle
In article <10h2alj$2vjp1$3@dont-email.me>, bax02 >>>>>>_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Petro Lomonosov <bubbles@in.valid> wrote in
news:20251206103743.0d592a6f@z-z:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2025 17:28:18 -0000 (UTC)
Webbster <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote in
news:jeb8jk1hjaoam47lohikt4lpllg2qso65i@4ax.com:
On Fri, 5 Dec 2025 21:54:32 -0000 (UTC), Marmalade King
<x@y.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<10gvkao$1qnau$1@dont-email.me> wrote:
The Trump administration says its proposal to roll back
Officefuel economy standards, announced officially in the Oval
ballooningon Wednesday, is an attempt to shave dollars off the
cost of new cars in the US.
The purpose of fuel standards is to force the public to buy >>>>>>> >> > EV by eliminating the choice to buy a gasoline powered
vehicle. That is the only way EV's will be generally
accepted because the sales figures make it obvious few want >>>>>>> >> > them now.
When automobiles first started, EV's were very popular - and
T'shadwas the fuel companies that forced them out.
Like they did to steam cars?
You are a laughable dolt.
There were NO viable charging stations and lead acid batteries
about a 20 mile range. Urban only - no long trips.
AI Overview
Electric Vehicles Had Their First Golden Age In The Early 1900s >>>>>>> > The early days of electric cars (roughly 1890s-1910s) saw them >>>>>>> > thrive as quiet, clean urban vehicles, even outselling gasoline >>>>>>> > cars briefly, with pioneers like William Morrison and Thomas
Parker creating early models, but they faded due to the Model
cheap,affordability and limited range, only to resurface with modern >>>>>>> > battery tech centuries later.
Decline & Resurgence
Henry Ford's Impact: The assembly line made gasoline cars
challengedwhile longer ranges and electric starters for gas cars
roadsEVs' advantages. Fading Out: By 1914-1935, sales plummeted,================
relegating EVs to niche uses like golf carts.
AI Overview
Early electric cars were surprisingly popular, dominating city
transport and making up about a third of all vehicles on U.S.
bygeararound 1900 due to their quietness, ease of use (no cranking or
dwellersshifting), and lack of fumes, especially appealing to urban
cheaperand women, but their reign ended with the mass production of
gasoline cars like the Ford Model T, making them a niche product
She'sthe 1920s.
==========
BTW, even today the majority of miles driven are in urban
environments
Gas. Deal with it. We have lots of it. More than Lithium
even.
I'm real happy with my big full size pickup and it's V8 engine.
othera bit of a gas hog, but there are gas stations everywhere.
Gas stations' long decline
Jul 15, 2022
The number of gas stations has been
in steady decline for decades, and
the volatility in gas prices — along
with the rising popularity of electric
vehicles — will squeeze them even further. >>>>https://www.axios.com/2022/07/15/gas-stations-prices-closing
<EYEROLL> There's still too many gas stations. Often they'll be a
couple right acrosss the street each other, sometimes there will be
three at major intersections, and four or five at interstate and
super highway exits.
I'm planning a couple of long trips for next summer and unlike EV
drivers, I won't give a moments thought to checking for gas/recharge
stations.
1) Recharge places are everywhere.
<LOL> No they're not, and those that are have one or two plugs and you
have to wait your turn.
2) You 5 minute full tank costs $50,
my 20 minute recharge cost me $6.
I will take that tradeoff any day.....
<GRIN> If you actually had an EV, you'd know that it costs more than
that.
Collectivists_Always_Fail <MeanDog@stonewall.Dash> wrote in >news:po3bjkhl95k1hde7k406au7fvv3paui8jp@4ax.com:
On Sun, 07 Dec 2025 14:24:39 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com>wrote:
wrote:
Collectivists_Always_Fail <MeanDog@stonewall.Dash> wrote in >>>news:vj8ajk1obqorjpi35601loagodcrl06s98@4ax.com:
On Sun, 07 Dec 2025 03:15:37 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com>
wrote:
Collectivists_Always_Fail <MeanDog@stonewall.Dash> wrote in >>>>>news:dgg9jkt30odtf3lmecdbn35o40vqmkjuga@4ax.com:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2025 16:49:05 -0700, Skeeter <invalid@none.com>
it
In article <10h2alj$2vjp1$3@dont-email.me>, bax02 >>>>>>>_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Petro Lomonosov <bubbles@in.valid> wrote in
news:20251206103743.0d592a6f@z-z:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2025 17:28:18 -0000 (UTC)
Webbster <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote in
news:jeb8jk1hjaoam47lohikt4lpllg2qso65i@4ax.com:
On Fri, 5 Dec 2025 21:54:32 -0000 (UTC), Marmalade King
<x@y.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<10gvkao$1qnau$1@dont-email.me> wrote:
The Trump administration says its proposal to roll back >>>vehicle
fuel economy standards, announced officially in the Oval >>>Office
on Wednesday, is an attempt to shave dollars off the >>>ballooning
cost of new cars in the US.
The purpose of fuel standards is to force the public to buy >>>>>>>> >> > EV by eliminating the choice to buy a gasoline powered
vehicle. That is the only way EV's will be generally
accepted because the sales figures make it obvious few want >>>>>>>> >> > them now.
When automobiles first started, EV's were very popular - and
T'swas the fuel companies that forced them out.
Like they did to steam cars?
You are a laughable dolt.
There were NO viable charging stations and lead acid batteries >>>had
about a 20 mile range. Urban only - no long trips.
AI Overview
Electric Vehicles Had Their First Golden Age In The Early 1900s >>>>>>>> > The early days of electric cars (roughly 1890s-1910s) saw them >>>>>>>> > thrive as quiet, clean urban vehicles, even outselling gasoline >>>>>>>> > cars briefly, with pioneers like William Morrison and Thomas >>>>>>>> > Parker creating early models, but they faded due to the Model
cheap,affordability and limited range, only to resurface with modern >>>>>>>> > battery tech centuries later.
Decline & Resurgence
Henry Ford's Impact: The assembly line made gasoline cars
challengedwhile longer ranges and electric starters for gas cars
roadsEVs' advantages. Fading Out: By 1914-1935, sales plummeted,================
relegating EVs to niche uses like golf carts.
AI Overview
Early electric cars were surprisingly popular, dominating city >>>>>>>> transport and making up about a third of all vehicles on U.S.
byaround 1900 due to their quietness, ease of use (no cranking or >>>gear
shifting), and lack of fumes, especially appealing to urban >>>dwellers
and women, but their reign ended with the mass production of >>>cheaper
gasoline cars like the Ford Model T, making them a niche product
She'sthe 1920s.
==========
BTW, even today the majority of miles driven are in urban
environments
Gas. Deal with it. We have lots of it. More than Lithium
even.
I'm real happy with my big full size pickup and it's V8 engine.
othera bit of a gas hog, but there are gas stations everywhere.
Gas stations' long decline
Jul 15, 2022
The number of gas stations has been
in steady decline for decades, and
the volatility in gas prices — along
with the rising popularity of electric
vehicles — will squeeze them even further. >>>>>https://www.axios.com/2022/07/15/gas-stations-prices-closing
<EYEROLL> There's still too many gas stations. Often they'll be a
couple right acrosss the street each other, sometimes there will be
three at major intersections, and four or five at interstate and
super highway exits.
I'm planning a couple of long trips for next summer and unlike EV
drivers, I won't give a moments thought to checking for gas/recharge
stations.
1) Recharge places are everywhere.
<LOL> No they're not, and those that are have one or two plugs and you
have to wait your turn.
I have never had to wait for a
charging station. Esp since most
of us charge our cars at home. Can
you fill up your tank at home?
2) You 5 minute full tank costs $50,
my 20 minute recharge cost me $6.
I will take that tradeoff any day.....
<GRIN> If you actually had an EV, you'd know that it costs more than
that.
You have never been inside an EV,
I have owned mine for 6 years.
PS: Can you gas up your car at
home for same cost as running a load
of laundry?
And where in the big cities was their room to keep horses. ;Course there >>was steady employment for people to sweep up horse shit, and clean your >>shoes of horse shit, etc. Sure, lets to back to horses - you can be the >>cowboy you always fantasized about.
No fantasies necessary for that.
On 2025-12-07, Collectivists_Always_Fail <MeanDog@stonewall.Dash> wrote:
And where in the big cities was their room to keep horses. ;Course there >>was steady employment for people to sweep up horse shit, and clean your >>shoes of horse shit, etc. Sure, lets to back to horses - you can be the >>cowboy you always fantasized about.
No fantasies necessary for that.
Can you guys remove alt.computer.workshop from your postings (no one
from this ng is responding to this thread, not even 'the usual
suspect').
Thanks for your consideration.
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:6935ff15$1$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Dec 7, 2025 at 1:46:43 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.439f95a1b84bd70a98a935@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6935e308$5$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 7, 2025 at 12:13:54 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.439f7fddef4f79aa98a931@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <10h4iqq$3gqsq$13@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>,
"Steve Carroll"@noone.none says...
On 2025-12-07, Collectivists_Always_Fail <MeanDog@stonewall.Dash>
wrote:
And where in the big cities was their room to keep horses.
;Course there was steady employment for people to sweep up horse >>>>>>>> shit, and clean your shoes of horse shit, etc. Sure, lets to
back to horses - you can be the cowboy you always fantasized
about.
No fantasies necessary for that.
Can you guys remove alt.computer.workshop from your postings (no
one from this ng is responding to this thread, not even 'the usual >>>>>> suspect').
Thanks for your consideration.
But you allow people like Snit to stink up the group.
Allow? Nobody controls me... and I do not seek to control others.
You are a lousy troll
You are a very practiced one. I am not. Sure.
Has skeeter been trolling for 20 years like you have snit?
Ask him.
and stink up the place. Why do you
nymshift? Is it because no one wants to hear from you?
You are projecting. So be it.
No.
You are projecting.
It's what you do.
Skeeter is correct. Nobody wants you around. So why not just disappear
and find something else to waste your life away on, snit.
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:6935fefb$1$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Dec 7, 2025 at 2:08:24 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<c1mZQ.294863$f%Cf.56419@fx18.iad>:
On 12/7/25 3:46 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <6935e308$5$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 7, 2025 at 12:13:54 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.439f7fddef4f79aa98a931@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <10h4iqq$3gqsq$13@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>,
"Steve Carroll"@noone.none says...
But you allow people like Snit to stink up the group.
Allow? Nobody controls me... and I do not seek to control others.
You are a lousy troll and stink up the place. Why do you
nymshift? Is it because no one wants to hear from you?
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting
him off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.
He is the ring leader -- and has talked about contacting people off
Usenet. A few people have spoken up against him when he has asked them
to lie about me. Here is one example:
Marek <NPWdnVgF_NwsozXEnZ2dnUU7-YvNnZ2d@giganews.com>:
-----
So you're in the habit of making a whole user account for
Glasser on your Mac then, eh?
On the Mac, if you type in your full name, like "Michael
Glasser" it will convert that to the user name
"michaelglasser" by default for the sake of creating a
directory in /Users.
...
When I first tried to broker peace between you and Snit, you
And in my opinion, you were trying to give Glasser evidence
that he could use against me. I declined to help you and you
went on and on about how I'm snit.
-----
Carroll is completely insane and has been obsessed with me since 2004.
Oh, and almost surely Roy S. is another of his many, many socks.
Your cites
On 12/7/25 3:46 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <6935e308$5$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 7, 2025 at 12:13:54 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.439f7fddef4f79aa98a931@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <10h4iqq$3gqsq$13@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>, "Steve >>> Carroll"@noone.none says...
But you allow people like Snit to stink up the group.
Allow? Nobody controls me... and I do not seek to control others.
You are a lousy troll and stink up the place. Why do you
nymshift? Is it because no one wants to hear from you?
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting him
off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.
On Dec 7, 2025 at 2:08:24 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote <c1mZQ.294863$f%Cf.56419@fx18.iad>:
On 12/7/25 3:46 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <6935e308$5$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 7, 2025 at 12:13:54 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.439f7fddef4f79aa98a931@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <10h4iqq$3gqsq$13@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>, "Steve >>>> Carroll"@noone.none says...
But you allow people like Snit to stink up the group.
Allow? Nobody controls me... and I do not seek to control others.
You are a lousy troll and stink up the place. Why do you
nymshift? Is it because no one wants to hear from you?
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting him
off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.
He is the ring leader -- and has talked about contacting people off Usenet. A few people have spoken up against him when he has asked them to lie about me. Here is one example:
Marek <NPWdnVgF_NwsozXEnZ2dnUU7-YvNnZ2d@giganews.com>:
-----
So you're in the habit of making a whole user account for
Glasser on your Mac then, eh?
On the Mac, if you type in your full name, like "Michael
Glasser" it will convert that to the user name
"michaelglasser" by default for the sake of creating a
directory in /Users.
...
When I first tried to broker peace between you and Snit, you
And in my opinion, you were trying to give Glasser evidence
that he could use against me. I declined to help you and you
went on and on about how I'm snit.
-----
Carroll is completely insane and has been obsessed with me since 2004. Oh, and
almost surely Roy S. is another of his many, many socks.
On Dec 7, 2025 at 4:13:53 PM MST, ""Roy S."" wrote <XnsB3AEB97572CBF12345678@62.164.182.23>:
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:6935fefb$1$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Dec 7, 2025 at 2:08:24 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<c1mZQ.294863$f%Cf.56419@fx18.iad>:
On 12/7/25 3:46 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <6935e308$5$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 7, 2025 at 12:13:54 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.439f7fddef4f79aa98a931@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <10h4iqq$3gqsq$13@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>,
"Steve Carroll"@noone.none says...
But you allow people like Snit to stink up the group.
Allow? Nobody controls me... and I do not seek to control others.
You are a lousy troll and stink up the place. Why do you
nymshift? Is it because no one wants to hear from you?
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting
him off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.
He is the ring leader -- and has talked about contacting people off
Usenet. A few people have spoken up against him when he has asked them
to lie about me. Here is one example:
Marek <NPWdnVgF_NwsozXEnZ2dnUU7-YvNnZ2d@giganews.com>:
-----
So you're in the habit of making a whole user account for
Glasser on your Mac then, eh?
On the Mac, if you type in your full name, like "Michael
Glasser" it will convert that to the user name
"michaelglasser" by default for the sake of creating a
directory in /Users.
...
When I first tried to broker peace between you and Snit, you
And in my opinion, you were trying to give Glasser evidence
that he could use against me. I declined to help you and you
went on and on about how I'm snit.
-----
Carroll is completely insane and has been obsessed with me since 2004.
Oh, and almost surely Roy S. is another of his many, many socks.
Your cites
Prove my point. And you changed the topic, Sockboy.
No matter what name you use, you play the same games.
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:6935ff15$1$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Dec 7, 2025 at 1:46:43⤯PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <MPG.439f95a1b84bd70a98a935@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6935e308$5$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 7, 2025 at 12:13:54 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.439f7fddef4f79aa98a931@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <10h4iqq$3gqsq$13@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>,
"Steve Carroll"@noone.none says...
On 2025-12-07, Collectivists_Always_Fail <MeanDog@stonewall.Dash>
wrote:
And where in the big cities was their room to keep horses.
;Course there was steady employment for people to sweep up horse >>>>>>> shit, and clean your shoes of horse shit, etc. Sure, lets to
back to horses - you can be the cowboy you always fantasized
about.
No fantasies necessary for that.
Can you guys remove alt.computer.workshop from your postings (no
one from this ng is responding to this thread, not even 'the usual >>>>> suspect').
Thanks for your consideration.
But you allow people like Snit to stink up the group.
Allow? Nobody controls me... and I do not seek to control others.
You are a lousy troll
You are a very practiced one. I am not. Sure.
Has skeeter been trolling for 20 years like you have snit?
Ask him.
and stink up the place. Why do you
nymshift? Is it because no one wants to hear from you?
You are projecting. So be it.
No.
You are projecting.
It's what you do.
Skeeter is correct. Nobody wants you around. So why not just disappear
and find something else to waste your life away on, snit.
In article <6935fefb$1$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 7, 2025 at 2:08:24 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<c1mZQ.294863$f%Cf.56419@fx18.iad>:
On 12/7/25 3:46 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <6935e308$5$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 7, 2025 at 12:13:54 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.439f7fddef4f79aa98a931@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <10h4iqq$3gqsq$13@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>, "Steve >>>>>> Carroll"@noone.none says...
But you allow people like Snit to stink up the group.
Allow? Nobody controls me... and I do not seek to control others.
You are a lousy troll and stink up the place. Why do you
nymshift? Is it because no one wants to hear from you?
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting him
off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.
He is the ring leader -- and has talked about contacting people off Usenet. A
few people have spoken up against him when he has asked them to lie about me.
Here is one example:
Marek <NPWdnVgF_NwsozXEnZ2dnUU7-YvNnZ2d@giganews.com>:
-----
So you're in the habit of making a whole user account for
Glasser on your Mac then, eh?
On the Mac, if you type in your full name, like "Michael
Glasser" it will convert that to the user name
"michaelglasser" by default for the sake of creating a
directory in /Users.
...
When I first tried to broker peace between you and Snit, you
And in my opinion, you were trying to give Glasser evidence
that he could use against me. I declined to help you and you
went on and on about how I'm snit.
-----
Carroll is completely insane and has been obsessed with me since 2004. Oh, and
almost surely Roy S. is another of his many, many socks.
Says the nym shifting snit.
In article <c1mZQ.294863$f%Cf.56419@fx18.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/7/25 3:46 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <6935e308$5$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 7, 2025 at 12:13:54 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.439f7fddef4f79aa98a931@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <10h4iqq$3gqsq$13@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>, "Steve >>>>> Carroll"@noone.none says...
But you allow people like Snit to stink up the group.
Allow? Nobody controls me... and I do not seek to control others.
You are a lousy troll and stink up the place. Why do you
nymshift? Is it because no one wants to hear from you?
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting him
off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.
You are a moron, so what's your point?
On Dec 7, 2025 at 5:57:35 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <MPG.439fd06e2a175dee98a93a@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6935fefb$1$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 7, 2025 at 2:08:24 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<c1mZQ.294863$f%Cf.56419@fx18.iad>:
On 12/7/25 3:46 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <6935e308$5$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 7, 2025 at 12:13:54 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.439f7fddef4f79aa98a931@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <10h4iqq$3gqsq$13@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>, "Steve >>>>>> Carroll"@noone.none says...
But you allow people like Snit to stink up the group.
Allow? Nobody controls me... and I do not seek to control others.
You are a lousy troll and stink up the place. Why do you
nymshift? Is it because no one wants to hear from you?
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting him >>> off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.
He is the ring leader -- and has talked about contacting people off Usenet. A
few people have spoken up against him when he has asked them to lie about me.
Here is one example:
Marek <NPWdnVgF_NwsozXEnZ2dnUU7-YvNnZ2d@giganews.com>:
-----
So you're in the habit of making a whole user account for
Glasser on your Mac then, eh?
On the Mac, if you type in your full name, like "Michael
Glasser" it will convert that to the user name
"michaelglasser" by default for the sake of creating a
directory in /Users.
...
When I first tried to broker peace between you and Snit, you
And in my opinion, you were trying to give Glasser evidence
that he could use against me. I declined to help you and you
went on and on about how I'm snit.
-----
Carroll is completely insane and has been obsessed with me since 2004. Oh, and
almost surely Roy S. is another of his many, many socks.
Says the nym shifting snit.
I am openly using a new name. And I am correct.
On Sun, 7 Dec 2025 15:57:54 +0000, jojo <f00@0f0.00f> in
alt.atheism with message-id <427c3336-0e6b-ba31-fccd-004642b08a7b@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>
wrote:
Attila wrote:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2025 16:07:49 +0000, jojo <f00@0f0.00f> in
alt.atheism with message-id
<a57ac1a9-c5f8-b918-e686-c28f67cf21eb@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>
wrote:
Attila wrote:
On Fri, 5 Dec 2025 21:54:32 -0000 (UTC), Marmalade King
<x@y.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<10gvkao$1qnau$1@dont-email.me> wrote:
The Trump administration says its proposal to roll back vehicle
fuel economy standards, announced officially in the Oval Office
on Wednesday, is an attempt to shave dollars off the ballooning
cost of new cars in the US.
The purpose of fuel standards is to force the public to buy
EV by eliminating the choice to buy a gasoline powered
vehicle. That is the only way EV's will be generally
accepted because the sales figures make it obvious few want
them now.
i think evs are better, the battery tech has caught up and
charges last much longer. there are fewer moving parts and cuts
down huge on supply chain issues. plus, no reliace on oil.
with solid state batteries coming, gasoline and horses.
I will meet you in New York. You drive any EV you like and
I will drive a four cylinder roller skate. We will race to
LA and see who wins.
of course there are less charging stations (for now), because evs
have not had 100 years of industry. its all going to be
electric.. eventually.
Probably but EV's have a long way to go first. I would not
bother to drive one off the lot if it was free.
In article <693665b8$2$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 7, 2025 at 5:57:35 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.439fd06e2a175dee98a93a@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6935fefb$1$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 7, 2025 at 2:08:24 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<c1mZQ.294863$f%Cf.56419@fx18.iad>:
On 12/7/25 3:46 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <6935e308$5$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 7, 2025 at 12:13:54 PM MST, "Skeeter" wroteYou are a lousy troll and stink up the place. Why do you
<MPG.439f7fddef4f79aa98a931@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <10h4iqq$3gqsq$13@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>, "Steve >>>>>>>> Carroll"@noone.none says...
But you allow people like Snit to stink up the group.
Allow? Nobody controls me... and I do not seek to control others. >>>>>>
nymshift? Is it because no one wants to hear from you?
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting him >>>>> off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.
He is the ring leader -- and has talked about contacting people off Usenet. A
few people have spoken up against him when he has asked them to lie about me.
Here is one example:
Marek <NPWdnVgF_NwsozXEnZ2dnUU7-YvNnZ2d@giganews.com>:
-----
So you're in the habit of making a whole user account for
Glasser on your Mac then, eh?
On the Mac, if you type in your full name, like "Michael
Glasser" it will convert that to the user name
"michaelglasser" by default for the sake of creating a
directory in /Users.
...
When I first tried to broker peace between you and Snit, you
And in my opinion, you were trying to give Glasser evidence
that he could use against me. I declined to help you and you
went on and on about how I'm snit.
-----
Carroll is completely insane and has been obsessed with me since 2004. Oh, and
almost surely Roy S. is another of his many, many socks.
Says the nym shifting snit.
I am openly using a new name. And I am correct.
no excuses. you are guilty as rudy
In article <c1mZQ.294863$f%Cf.56419@fx18.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/7/25 3:46 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <6935e308$5$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 7, 2025 at 12:13:54Â PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.439f7fddef4f79aa98a931@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <10h4iqq$3gqsq$13@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>, "Steve >>>>> Carroll"@noone.none says...
But you allow people like Snit to stink up the group.
Allow? Nobody controls me... and I do not seek to control others.
You are a lousy troll and stink up the place. Why do you
nymshift? Is it because no one wants to hear from you?
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting him
off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.
You are a moron, so what's your point?
On Dec 8, 2025 at 4:58:14 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <MPG.43a06b438a54a64998a93f@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <693665b8$2$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 7, 2025 at 5:57:35 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.439fd06e2a175dee98a93a@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6935fefb$1$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 7, 2025 at 2:08:24 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<c1mZQ.294863$f%Cf.56419@fx18.iad>:
On 12/7/25 3:46 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <6935e308$5$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 7, 2025 at 12:13:54 PM MST, "Skeeter" wroteYou are a lousy troll and stink up the place. Why do you
<MPG.439f7fddef4f79aa98a931@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <10h4iqq$3gqsq$13@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>, "Steve
Carroll"@noone.none says...
But you allow people like Snit to stink up the group.
Allow? Nobody controls me... and I do not seek to control others. >>>>>>
nymshift? Is it because no one wants to hear from you?
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting him >>>>> off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.
He is the ring leader -- and has talked about contacting people off Usenet. A
few people have spoken up against him when he has asked them to lie about me.
Here is one example:
Marek <NPWdnVgF_NwsozXEnZ2dnUU7-YvNnZ2d@giganews.com>:
-----
So you're in the habit of making a whole user account for
Glasser on your Mac then, eh?
On the Mac, if you type in your full name, like "Michael
Glasser" it will convert that to the user name
"michaelglasser" by default for the sake of creating a
directory in /Users.
...
When I first tried to broker peace between you and Snit, you
And in my opinion, you were trying to give Glasser evidence
that he could use against me. I declined to help you and you
went on and on about how I'm snit.
-----
Carroll is completely insane and has been obsessed with me since 2004. Oh, and
almost surely Roy S. is another of his many, many socks.
Says the nym shifting snit.
I am openly using a new name. And I am correct.
no excuses. you are guilty as rudy
Disagree... and your view means nothing to me. Next.
On 12/7/25 7:55 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <c1mZQ.294863$f%Cf.56419@fx18.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/7/25 3:46 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <6935e308$5$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 7, 2025 at 12:13:54 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.439f7fddef4f79aa98a931@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <10h4iqq$3gqsq$13@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>, "Steve >>>>> Carroll"@noone.none says...
But you allow people like Snit to stink up the group.
Allow? Nobody controls me... and I do not seek to control others.
You are a lousy troll and stink up the place. Why do you
nymshift? Is it because no one wants to hear from you?
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting him
off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.
You are a moron, so what's your point?
This whole place of Usenet belongs to people like Snit, who contribute something of value, you Skeeter are lower on that scale.
On 12/7/25 3:46 PM, Skeeter wrote:"Steve
In article <6935e308$5$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 7, 2025 at 12:13:54Â PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.439f7fddef4f79aa98a931@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <10h4iqq$3gqsq$13@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>,
Carroll"@noone.none says...
But you allow people like Snit to stink up the group.
Allow? Nobody controls me... and I do not seek to control others.
You are a lousy troll and stink up the place. Why do you
nymshift? Is it because no one wants to hear from you?
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting him
off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting himSnit contributes something of value?
off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.
Unless you are referring to comic relief, snit contributes nothing other
than trash and his own self esteem and mental issues. Here is a list or snit's contributions.
Snit isn't exactly father of the year now is he?
On 12/8/25 6:38 PM, Roy S. wrote:him
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting
otheroff Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.Snit contributes something of value?
Unless you are referring to comic relief, snit contributes nothing
orthan trash and his own self esteem and mental issues. Here is a list
snit's contributions.
Snit isn't exactly father of the year now is he?
*plonk*
On 12/8/25 6:38 PM, Roy S. wrote:
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting himSnit contributes something of value?
off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.
Unless you are referring to comic relief, snit contributes nothing other than trash and his own self esteem and mental issues. Here is a list or snit's contributions.
Snit isn't exactly father of the year now is he?
*plonk*
In article <pJJZQ.33314$aeF6.27565@fx40.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 6:38 PM, Roy S. wrote:
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting him >>>> off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.Snit contributes something of value?
Unless you are referring to comic relief, snit contributes nothing other >>> than trash and his own self esteem and mental issues. Here is a list or
snit's contributions.
Snit isn't exactly father of the year now is he?
*plonk*
Snit got slapped down by truth so now he runs.
On 12/8/25 7:22 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <pJJZQ.33314$aeF6.27565@fx40.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 6:38 PM, Roy S. wrote:
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting him >>>> off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.Snit contributes something of value?
Unless you are referring to comic relief, snit contributes nothing other >>> than trash and his own self esteem and mental issues. Here is a list or >>> snit's contributions.
Snit isn't exactly father of the year now is he?
*plonk*
Snit got slapped down by truth so now he runs.
I'm Joel, not Snit. I'm just as unamused by the attempts to treat him poorly by treating everyone poorly as I was before.
In article <a1KZQ.63075$sds3.8374@fx47.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 7:22 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <pJJZQ.33314$aeF6.27565@fx40.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 6:38 PM, Roy S. wrote:
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting him >>>>>> off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.Snit contributes something of value?
Unless you are referring to comic relief, snit contributes nothing other >>>>> than trash and his own self esteem and mental issues. Here is a list or >>>>> snit's contributions.
Snit isn't exactly father of the year now is he?
*plonk*
Snit got slapped down by truth so now he runs.
I'm Joel, not Snit. I'm just as unamused by the attempts to treat him
poorly by treating everyone poorly as I was before.
Do you feel like a victim?
In article <pJJZQ.33314$aeF6.27565@fx40.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 6:38 PM, Roy S. wrote:
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting him >>>> off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.Snit contributes something of value?
Unless you are referring to comic relief, snit contributes nothing other >>> than trash and his own self esteem and mental issues. Here is a list or
snit's contributions.
Snit isn't exactly father of the year now is he?
*plonk*
Snit got slapped down by truth so now he runs.
On 12/8/25 6:38 PM, Roy S. wrote:
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting himSnit contributes something of value?
off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.
Unless you are referring to comic relief, snit contributes nothing other
than trash and his own self esteem and mental issues. Here is a list or
snit's contributions.
Snit isn't exactly father of the year now is he?
*plonk*
On Dec 8, 2025 at 5:05:41 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote <pJJZQ.33314$aeF6.27565@fx40.iad>:
On 12/8/25 6:38 PM, Roy S. wrote:
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting him >>>> off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.Snit contributes something of value?
Unless you are referring to comic relief, snit contributes nothing other >>> than trash and his own self esteem and mental issues. Here is a list or
snit's contributions.
Snit isn't exactly father of the year now is he?
*plonk*
Almost surely one of Carroll's many socks. Even posting some of Carroll's old "screenshots", one of which I just busted as being clearly and obviously faked
(same charge listed as both domestic [civil] and criminal).
On 12/8/25 8:20 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <a1KZQ.63075$sds3.8374@fx47.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 7:22 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <pJJZQ.33314$aeF6.27565@fx40.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 6:38 PM, Roy S. wrote:
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed withSnit contributes something of value?
getting him
off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.
Unless you are referring to comic relief, snit contributes nothing >>>>>> other
than trash and his own self esteem and mental issues. Here is a
list or
snit's contributions.
Snit isn't exactly father of the year now is he?
*plonk*
Snit got slapped down by truth so now he runs.
I'm Joel, not Snit. I'm just as unamused by the attempts to treat him
poorly by treating everyone poorly as I was before.
Do you feel like a victim?
I feel like people should stop coming out of the woodwork to negatively comment on Snit, it's creepy, it's obviously Steve Carroll believing
he's found someone to pick on, and Satan has divinely blessed him with
the deed to caricature Snit and annoy others with attacks on him.
The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled:
On 12/8/2025 5:25 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 12/8/25 8:20 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <a1KZQ.63075$sds3.8374@fx47.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 7:22 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <pJJZQ.33314$aeF6.27565@fx40.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 6:38 PM, Roy S. wrote:
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed withSnit contributes something of value?
getting him
off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.
Unless you are referring to comic relief, snit contributes
nothing other
than trash and his own self esteem and mental issues. Here is a >>>>>>> list or
snit's contributions.
Snit isn't exactly father of the year now is he?
*plonk*
Snit got slapped down by truth so now he runs.
I'm Joel, not Snit. I'm just as unamused by the attempts to treat him >>>> poorly by treating everyone poorly as I was before.
Do you feel like a victim?
I feel like people should stop coming out of the woodwork to
negatively comment on Snit, it's creepy, it's obviously Steve Carroll
believing he's found someone to pick on, and Satan has divinely
blessed him with the deed to caricature Snit and annoy others with
attacks on him.
"Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled:
Why did Spanferkel boi say that about Snit in 2017?
On 12/8/25 9:25 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Dec 8, 2025 at 5:05:41 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<pJJZQ.33314$aeF6.27565@fx40.iad>:
On 12/8/25 6:38 PM, Roy S. wrote:
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting him >>>>> off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.Snit contributes something of value?
Unless you are referring to comic relief, snit contributes nothing other >>>> than trash and his own self esteem and mental issues. Here is a list or >>>> snit's contributions.
Snit isn't exactly father of the year now is he?
*plonk*
Almost surely one of Carroll's many socks. Even posting some of Carroll's old
"screenshots", one of which I just busted as being clearly and obviously faked
(same charge listed as both domestic [civil] and criminal).
And this is the kind of thing regulars in COLA have tolerated because it
was against _you_. It shows the kind of character in the group.
On 12/8/25 8:20 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <a1KZQ.63075$sds3.8374@fx47.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 7:22 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <pJJZQ.33314$aeF6.27565@fx40.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 6:38 PM, Roy S. wrote:
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting himSnit contributes something of value?
off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.
Unless you are referring to comic relief, snit contributes nothing other
than trash and his own self esteem and mental issues. Here is a list or >>>>> snit's contributions.
Snit isn't exactly father of the year now is he?
*plonk*
Snit got slapped down by truth so now he runs.
I'm Joel, not Snit. I'm just as unamused by the attempts to treat him
poorly by treating everyone poorly as I was before.
Do you feel like a victim?
I feel like people should stop coming out of the woodwork to negatively comment on Snit, it's creepy, it's obviously Steve Carroll believing
he's found someone to pick on, and Satan has divinely blessed him with
the deed to caricature Snit and annoy others with attacks on him.
On Dec 8, 2025 at 5:22:50 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <MPG.43a119c12d28a9d898a948@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <pJJZQ.33314$aeF6.27565@fx40.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 6:38 PM, Roy S. wrote:
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting him >>>> off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.Snit contributes something of value?
Unless you are referring to comic relief, snit contributes nothing other >>> than trash and his own self esteem and mental issues. Here is a list or >>> snit's contributions.
Snit isn't exactly father of the year now is he?
*plonk*
Snit got slapped down by truth so now he runs.
Your need for attention is a YOU problem.
On Dec 8, 2025 at 7:31:09 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote <ORLZQ.257968$uGW5.219262@fx14.iad>:
On 12/8/25 9:25 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Dec 8, 2025 at 5:05:41 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<pJJZQ.33314$aeF6.27565@fx40.iad>:
On 12/8/25 6:38 PM, Roy S. wrote:
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting him >>>>> off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.Snit contributes something of value?
Unless you are referring to comic relief, snit contributes nothing other >>>> than trash and his own self esteem and mental issues. Here is a list or >>>> snit's contributions.
Snit isn't exactly father of the year now is he?
*plonk*
Almost surely one of Carroll's many socks. Even posting some of Carroll's old
"screenshots", one of which I just busted as being clearly and obviously faked
(same charge listed as both domestic [civil] and criminal).
And this is the kind of thing regulars in COLA have tolerated because it was against _you_. It shows the kind of character in the group.
The cycle goes on... images are shown, claimed to be screenshots. I show where
they are not possible (in this case civil vs criminal nonsense). So they come up with a newer image. Eventually it is not disprovable... other than it is not on the site they say it is. Or was. And then they get to this nonsense of directly admitting:
"Can I prove it? No..."
There is a "lack of evidence"
Or blaming someone else:
"some state-level bureaucrat making erroneous entries"
OK... so that means it is NOT tied to me at all. Those are all from the ring leader -- Carroll. He openly admits he has NO evidence. He cannot prove it. His explanation for why it is not on the site he says it is (was?) is from some red tape.
So why blame me?
He ignores his own admissions and does. Time and time again.
And then in the greatest irony, insists this means I am lying. Huh? His lies -- admitted lies -- prove OTHERS are lying but not him?
Insane.
On 12/8/25 9:34 PM, bueller wrote:
On 12/8/2025 5:25 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 12/8/25 8:20 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <a1KZQ.63075$sds3.8374@fx47.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 7:22 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <pJJZQ.33314$aeF6.27565@fx40.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 6:38 PM, Roy S. wrote:
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with >>>>>>>> getting himSnit contributes something of value?
off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.
Unless you are referring to comic relief, snit contributes
nothing other
than trash and his own self esteem and mental issues. Here is a >>>>>>> list or
snit's contributions.
Snit isn't exactly father of the year now is he?
*plonk*
Snit got slapped down by truth so now he runs.
I'm Joel, not Snit. I'm just as unamused by the attempts to treat him >>>> poorly by treating everyone poorly as I was before.
Do you feel like a victim?
I feel like people should stop coming out of the woodwork to
negatively comment on Snit, it's creepy, it's obviously Steve Carroll
believing he's found someone to pick on, and Satan has divinely
blessed him with the deed to caricature Snit and annoy others with
attacks on him.
"Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled:
Why did Spanferkel boi say that about Snit in 2017?
Peter was an asshole, basically, but very good on judging open-source software on the merits, as I do in his place still.
*plonk*
Snit got slapped down by truth so now he runs.
I'm Joel, not Snit. I'm just as unamused by the attempts to treat him >>>> poorly by treating everyone poorly as I was before.
Do you feel like a victim?
I feel like people should stop coming out of the woodwork to negatively
comment on Snit, it's creepy, it's obviously Steve Carroll believing
he's found someone to pick on, and Satan has divinely blessed him with
the deed to caricature Snit and annoy others with attacks on him.
Answer the question.
On 12/8/25 10:40 PM, Skeeter wrote:
*plonk*
Snit got slapped down by truth so now he runs.
I'm Joel, not Snit. I'm just as unamused by the attempts to treat him >>>> poorly by treating everyone poorly as I was before.
Do you feel like a victim?
I feel like people should stop coming out of the woodwork to negatively
comment on Snit, it's creepy, it's obviously Steve Carroll believing
he's found someone to pick on, and Satan has divinely blessed him with
the deed to caricature Snit and annoy others with attacks on him.
Answer the question.
What I feel like is irrelevant. If I'm a victim there's something to meaningfully have harmed me, which is impossible in a digital forum.
In article <cUKZQ.514999$f%Cf.149940@fx18.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 8:20 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <a1KZQ.63075$sds3.8374@fx47.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 7:22 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <pJJZQ.33314$aeF6.27565@fx40.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 6:38 PM, Roy S. wrote:
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting himSnit contributes something of value?
off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.
Unless you are referring to comic relief, snit contributes nothing other
than trash and his own self esteem and mental issues. Here is a list or >>>>>>> snit's contributions.
Snit isn't exactly father of the year now is he?
*plonk*
Snit got slapped down by truth so now he runs.
I'm Joel, not Snit. I'm just as unamused by the attempts to treat him >>>> poorly by treating everyone poorly as I was before.
Do you feel like a victim?
I feel like people should stop coming out of the woodwork to negatively
comment on Snit, it's creepy, it's obviously Steve Carroll believing
he's found someone to pick on, and Satan has divinely blessed him with
the deed to caricature Snit and annoy others with attacks on him.
Answer the question.
On Dec 8, 2025 at 8:40:03 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <MPG.43a147ff57c28ab998a94d@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <cUKZQ.514999$f%Cf.149940@fx18.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 8:20 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <a1KZQ.63075$sds3.8374@fx47.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 7:22 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <pJJZQ.33314$aeF6.27565@fx40.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 6:38 PM, Roy S. wrote:
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting himSnit contributes something of value?
off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.
Unless you are referring to comic relief, snit contributes nothing other
than trash and his own self esteem and mental issues. Here is a list or
snit's contributions.
Snit isn't exactly father of the year now is he?
*plonk*
Snit got slapped down by truth so now he runs.
I'm Joel, not Snit. I'm just as unamused by the attempts to treat him >>>> poorly by treating everyone poorly as I was before.
Do you feel like a victim?
I feel like people should stop coming out of the woodwork to negatively
comment on Snit, it's creepy, it's obviously Steve Carroll believing
he's found someone to pick on, and Satan has divinely blessed him with
the deed to caricature Snit and annoy others with attacks on him.
Answer the question.
You seek to victimize people. How they feel is not the right question. But it is interesting to see you beg to find out how much harm you cause.
In article <69382d28$2$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 8, 2025 at 8:40:03 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.43a147ff57c28ab998a94d@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <cUKZQ.514999$f%Cf.149940@fx18.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 8:20 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <a1KZQ.63075$sds3.8374@fx47.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 7:22 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <pJJZQ.33314$aeF6.27565@fx40.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 6:38 PM, Roy S. wrote:
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting himSnit contributes something of value?
off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.
Unless you are referring to comic relief, snit contributes nothing other
than trash and his own self esteem and mental issues. Here is a list or
snit's contributions.
Snit isn't exactly father of the year now is he?
*plonk*
Snit got slapped down by truth so now he runs.
I'm Joel, not Snit. I'm just as unamused by the attempts to treat him >>>>>> poorly by treating everyone poorly as I was before.
Do you feel like a victim?
I feel like people should stop coming out of the woodwork to negatively >>>> comment on Snit, it's creepy, it's obviously Steve Carroll believing
he's found someone to pick on, and Satan has divinely blessed him with >>>> the deed to caricature Snit and annoy others with attacks on him.
Answer the question.
You seek to victimize people. How they feel is not the right question. But it
is interesting to see you beg to find out how much harm you cause.
Do you feel harmed?
I feel like people should stop coming out of the woodwork to negatively >comment on Snit, it's creepy, it's obviously Steve Carroll believing
he's found someone to pick on, and Satan has divinely blessed him with
the deed to caricature Snit and annoy others with attacks on him.
On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 20:25:27 -0500, "Joel W. Crump" wrote:
I feel like people should stop coming out of the woodwork to negatively
comment on Snit, it's creepy, it's obviously Steve Carroll believing
he's found someone to pick on, and Satan has divinely blessed him with
the deed to caricature Snit and annoy others with attacks on him.
I routinely filter anybody mentioning Snit since that's part of a
personal flame war I have no interest in. For that reason, I rarely
see such antiSnit posts.
On Dec 9, 2025 at 9:39:50 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <MPG.43a1febcdffde74198a955@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <69382d28$2$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 8, 2025 at 8:40:03 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.43a147ff57c28ab998a94d@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <cUKZQ.514999$f%Cf.149940@fx18.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 8:20 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <a1KZQ.63075$sds3.8374@fx47.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 7:22 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <pJJZQ.33314$aeF6.27565@fx40.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 6:38 PM, Roy S. wrote:
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting himSnit contributes something of value?
off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.
Unless you are referring to comic relief, snit contributes nothing other
than trash and his own self esteem and mental issues. Here is a list or
snit's contributions.
Snit isn't exactly father of the year now is he?
*plonk*
Snit got slapped down by truth so now he runs.
I'm Joel, not Snit. I'm just as unamused by the attempts to treat him >>>>>> poorly by treating everyone poorly as I was before.
Do you feel like a victim?
I feel like people should stop coming out of the woodwork to negatively >>>> comment on Snit, it's creepy, it's obviously Steve Carroll believing >>>> he's found someone to pick on, and Satan has divinely blessed him with >>>> the deed to caricature Snit and annoy others with attacks on him.
Answer the question.
You seek to victimize people. How they feel is not the right question. But it
is interesting to see you beg to find out how much harm you cause.
Do you feel harmed?
Irrelevant to the fact you seek to cause harm. But it is interesting you are trying to find how successful you are with your attacks. I shall not help you with that endeavor.
On Dec 9, 2025 at 3:02:59 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote <e27hjkd6tjj1jpehgj4lfvafjjh8kso9o4@4ax.com>:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 20:25:27 -0500, "Joel W. Crump" wrote:
I feel like people should stop coming out of the woodwork to negatively
comment on Snit, it's creepy, it's obviously Steve Carroll believing
he's found someone to pick on, and Satan has divinely blessed him with
the deed to caricature Snit and annoy others with attacks on him.
I routinely filter anybody mentioning Snit since that's part of a
personal flame war I have no interest in. For that reason, I rarely
see such antiSnit posts.
A wise choice.
In article <69385803$1$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 9, 2025 at 9:39:50 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.43a1febcdffde74198a955@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <69382d28$2$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 8, 2025 at 8:40:03 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.43a147ff57c28ab998a94d@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <cUKZQ.514999$f%Cf.149940@fx18.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 8:20 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <a1KZQ.63075$sds3.8374@fx47.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 7:22 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <pJJZQ.33314$aeF6.27565@fx40.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 6:38 PM, Roy S. wrote:
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting himSnit contributes something of value?
off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.
Unless you are referring to comic relief, snit contributes nothing other
than trash and his own self esteem and mental issues. Here is a list or
snit's contributions.
Snit isn't exactly father of the year now is he?
*plonk*
Snit got slapped down by truth so now he runs.
I'm Joel, not Snit. I'm just as unamused by the attempts to treat him >>>>>>>> poorly by treating everyone poorly as I was before.
Do you feel like a victim?
I feel like people should stop coming out of the woodwork to negatively >>>>>> comment on Snit, it's creepy, it's obviously Steve Carroll believing >>>>>> he's found someone to pick on, and Satan has divinely blessed him with >>>>>> the deed to caricature Snit and annoy others with attacks on him.
Answer the question.
You seek to victimize people. How they feel is not the right question. But it
is interesting to see you beg to find out how much harm you cause.
Do you feel harmed?
Irrelevant to the fact you seek to cause harm. But it is interesting you are >> trying to find how successful you are with your attacks. I shall not help you
with that endeavor.
On Dec 9, 2025 at 3:21:36 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <MPG.43a24ed93f4dc7d098a95c@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <69385803$1$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 9, 2025 at 9:39:50 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.43a1febcdffde74198a955@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <69382d28$2$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 8, 2025 at 8:40:03 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.43a147ff57c28ab998a94d@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <cUKZQ.514999$f%Cf.149940@fx18.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
Answer the question.
On 12/8/25 8:20 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <a1KZQ.63075$sds3.8374@fx47.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 7:22 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <pJJZQ.33314$aeF6.27565@fx40.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 6:38 PM, Roy S. wrote:
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting himSnit contributes something of value?
off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.
Unless you are referring to comic relief, snit contributes nothing other
than trash and his own self esteem and mental issues. Here is a list or
snit's contributions.
Snit isn't exactly father of the year now is he?
*plonk*
Snit got slapped down by truth so now he runs.
I'm Joel, not Snit. I'm just as unamused by the attempts to treat him
poorly by treating everyone poorly as I was before.
Do you feel like a victim?
I feel like people should stop coming out of the woodwork to negatively
comment on Snit, it's creepy, it's obviously Steve Carroll believing >>>>>> he's found someone to pick on, and Satan has divinely blessed him with >>>>>> the deed to caricature Snit and annoy others with attacks on him. >>>>>
You seek to victimize people. How they feel is not the right question. But it
is interesting to see you beg to find out how much harm you cause.
Do you feel harmed?
Irrelevant to the fact you seek to cause harm. But it is interesting you are
trying to find how successful you are with your attacks. I shall not help you
with that endeavor.
You ignored this.
...
In article <6938a276$3$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 9, 2025 at 3:21:36 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.43a24ed93f4dc7d098a95c@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <69385803$1$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 9, 2025 at 9:39:50 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.43a1febcdffde74198a955@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <69382d28$2$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 8, 2025 at 8:40:03 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.43a147ff57c28ab998a94d@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <cUKZQ.514999$f%Cf.149940@fx18.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
Answer the question.
On 12/8/25 8:20 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <a1KZQ.63075$sds3.8374@fx47.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 7:22 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <pJJZQ.33314$aeF6.27565@fx40.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 6:38 PM, Roy S. wrote:
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting himSnit contributes something of value?
off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.
Unless you are referring to comic relief, snit contributes nothing other
than trash and his own self esteem and mental issues. Here is a list or
snit's contributions.
Snit isn't exactly father of the year now is he?
*plonk*
Snit got slapped down by truth so now he runs.
I'm Joel, not Snit. I'm just as unamused by the attempts to treat him
poorly by treating everyone poorly as I was before.
Do you feel like a victim?
I feel like people should stop coming out of the woodwork to negatively
comment on Snit, it's creepy, it's obviously Steve Carroll believing >>>>>>>> he's found someone to pick on, and Satan has divinely blessed him with >>>>>>>> the deed to caricature Snit and annoy others with attacks on him. >>>>>>>
You seek to victimize people. How they feel is not the right question. But it
is interesting to see you beg to find out how much harm you cause.
Do you feel harmed?
Irrelevant to the fact you seek to cause harm. But it is interesting you are
trying to find how successful you are with your attacks. I shall not help you
with that endeavor.
On Dec 9, 2025 at 3:35:48 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <MPG.43a252243f46a80c98a961@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6938a276$3$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 9, 2025 at 3:21:36 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.43a24ed93f4dc7d098a95c@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <69385803$1$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 9, 2025 at 9:39:50 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.43a1febcdffde74198a955@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <69382d28$2$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
Do you feel harmed?
On Dec 8, 2025 at 8:40:03 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.43a147ff57c28ab998a94d@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <cUKZQ.514999$f%Cf.149940@fx18.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
Answer the question.
On 12/8/25 8:20 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <a1KZQ.63075$sds3.8374@fx47.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 7:22 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <pJJZQ.33314$aeF6.27565@fx40.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/8/25 6:38 PM, Roy S. wrote:
Snit is just a fun guy with some kind of cult obsessed with getting himSnit contributes something of value?
off Usenet. Steve Carroll is the big troll.
Unless you are referring to comic relief, snit contributes nothing other
than trash and his own self esteem and mental issues. Here is a list or
snit's contributions.
Snit isn't exactly father of the year now is he?
*plonk*
Snit got slapped down by truth so now he runs.
I'm Joel, not Snit. I'm just as unamused by the attempts to treat him
poorly by treating everyone poorly as I was before.
Do you feel like a victim?
I feel like people should stop coming out of the woodwork to negatively
comment on Snit, it's creepy, it's obviously Steve Carroll believing >>>>>>>> he's found someone to pick on, and Satan has divinely blessed him with
the deed to caricature Snit and annoy others with attacks on him. >>>>>>>
You seek to victimize people. How they feel is not the right question. But it
is interesting to see you beg to find out how much harm you cause. >>>>>
Irrelevant to the fact you seek to cause harm. But it is interesting you are
trying to find how successful you are with your attacks. I shall not help you
with that endeavor.
I guess you are just not going to respond to this... you just want attention.
In article <6938a732$0$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 9, 2025 at 3:35:48 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.43a252243f46a80c98a961@usnews.blocknews.net>:
Irrelevant to the fact you seek to cause harm. But it is interesting you are
trying to find how successful you are with your attacks. I shall not help you
with that endeavor.
I guess you are just not going to respond to this... you just want attention.
I made you respond to your own post. Now fetch.
On Dec 9, 2025 at 10:15:40 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <MPG.43a2afe451ed0c2798a966@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6938a732$0$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 9, 2025 at 3:35:48 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.43a252243f46a80c98a961@usnews.blocknews.net>:
...
Irrelevant to the fact you seek to cause harm. But it is interesting you are
trying to find how successful you are with your attacks. I shall not help you
with that endeavor.
I guess you are just not going to respond to this... you just want attention.
I made you respond to your own post. Now fetch.
You got yourself so turned around with your socks you lost track of which names you use. Funny. But back to the point:
Irrelevant to the fact you seek to cause harm. But it is interesting
you are trying to find how successful you are with your attacks. I
shall not help you with that endeavor.
Why is it you trolls are always so cowardly?
In article <693989d0$5$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 9, 2025 at 10:15:40 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.43a2afe451ed0c2798a966@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6938a732$0$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 9, 2025 at 3:35:48 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.43a252243f46a80c98a961@usnews.blocknews.net>:
...
Irrelevant to the fact you seek to cause harm. But it is interesting you are
trying to find how successful you are with your attacks. I shall not help you
with that endeavor.
I guess you are just not going to respond to this... you just want attention.
I made you respond to your own post. Now fetch.
You got yourself so turned around with your socks you lost track of which
names you use. Funny. But back to the point:
I only post as Skeeter.
Irrelevant to the fact you seek to cause harm. But it is interesting
you are trying to find how successful you are with your attacks. I
shall not help you with that endeavor.
On Dec 10, 2025 at 10:42:23 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <MPG.43a35eee7094a6b598a967@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <693989d0$5$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 9, 2025 at 10:15:40 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.43a2afe451ed0c2798a966@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6938a732$0$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 9, 2025 at 3:35:48 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.43a252243f46a80c98a961@usnews.blocknews.net>:
...
Irrelevant to the fact you seek to cause harm. But it is interesting you are
trying to find how successful you are with your attacks. I shall not help you
with that endeavor.
I guess you are just not going to respond to this... you just want attention.
I made you respond to your own post. Now fetch.
You got yourself so turned around with your socks you lost track of which >> names you use. Funny. But back to the point:
I only post as Skeeter.
If so it must be drugs or some other serious issue to have you confuse names like that. LOL!
Irrelevant to the fact you seek to cause harm. But it is interesting >> you are trying to find how successful you are with your attacks. I
shall not help you with that endeavor.
Still no reply from you. You respond but ignore the content of the message you
reply to. Bad form.
In article <6939b7af$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 10, 2025 at 10:42:23 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.43a35eee7094a6b598a967@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <693989d0$5$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 9, 2025 at 10:15:40 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.43a2afe451ed0c2798a966@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6938a732$0$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 9, 2025 at 3:35:48 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.43a252243f46a80c98a961@usnews.blocknews.net>:
...
Irrelevant to the fact you seek to cause harm. But it is interesting you are
trying to find how successful you are with your attacks. I shall not help you
with that endeavor.
I guess you are just not going to respond to this... you just want attention.
I made you respond to your own post. Now fetch.
You got yourself so turned around with your socks you lost track of which >>>> names you use. Funny. But back to the point:
I only post as Skeeter.
If so it must be drugs or some other serious issue to have you confuse names >> like that. LOL!
You can't prove otherwise.
Irrelevant to the fact you seek to cause harm. But it is interesting >>>> you are trying to find how successful you are with your attacks. I >>>> shall not help you with that endeavor.
Still no reply from you. You respond but ignore the content of the message you
reply to. Bad form.
I responded
On Dec 10, 2025 at 11:24:02 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <MPG.43a368b110915db998a96c@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6939b7af$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 10, 2025 at 10:42:23 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.43a35eee7094a6b598a967@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <693989d0$5$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 9, 2025 at 10:15:40 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.43a2afe451ed0c2798a966@usnews.blocknews.net>:
In article <6938a732$0$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Dec 9, 2025 at 3:35:48 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<MPG.43a252243f46a80c98a961@usnews.blocknews.net>:
...
Irrelevant to the fact you seek to cause harm. But it is interesting you are
trying to find how successful you are with your attacks. I shall not help you
with that endeavor.
I guess you are just not going to respond to this... you just want attention.
I made you respond to your own post. Now fetch.
You got yourself so turned around with your socks you lost track of which
names you use. Funny. But back to the point:
I only post as Skeeter.
If so it must be drugs or some other serious issue to have you confuse names
like that. LOL!
You can't prove otherwise.
I cannot prove you are not on drugs. True.
Irrelevant to the fact you seek to cause harm. But it is interesting >>>> you are trying to find how successful you are with your attacks. I >>>> shall not help you with that endeavor.
Still no reply from you. You respond but ignore the content of the message you
reply to. Bad form.
I responded
Nope. You have ignored the fact:
Irrelevant to the fact you seek to cause harm. But it is interesting
you are trying to find how successful you are with your attacks. I
shall not help you with that endeavor.
You cannot face that without crying. So be it. Not my fault you cry over your own behavior.
| Sysop: | Scott |
|---|---|
| Location: | Freeburg, IL, USA, Earth |
| Users: | 4 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 246:05:30 |
| Calls: | 4 |
| Messages: | 14,713 |