It's weird that some types are flesh are quite enjoyable very rare while
others are not.... or maybe the risk factor is too high. I have no problem with Sashimi. I like grilled tuna that is basically just seared
on the outside and raw in the middle. I had a friend who was part Inuit
who introduced me to raw arctic char. If we cook salmon and part of it
is under cooked I'll take it. I have no problems eating scallops or
oysters raw. There are a number of seafood items that need to be
cooked, like trout, shrimp, sole.
On 2026-03-31, Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:
It's weird that some types are flesh are quite enjoyable very rare while
others are not.... or maybe the risk factor is too high. I have no
problem with Sashimi. I like grilled tuna that is basically just seared
on the outside and raw in the middle. I had a friend who was part Inuit
who introduced me to raw arctic char. If we cook salmon and part of it
is under cooked I'll take it. I have no problems eating scallops or
oysters raw. There are a number of seafood items that need to be
cooked, like trout, shrimp, sole.
We went to North Dakota when I was about six. My Dad and Uncle traveled
to Lac la Ronge to fish for arctic grayling and char. They were warned
to cook the fish thoroughly because of human transferable worms.
That always stuck with me. Whether it's true or not? 🤔
On 2026-03-31, Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:I had a friend who was part Inuit
who introduced me to raw arctic char. If we cook salmon and part of it
is under cooked I'll take it. I have no problems eating scallops or
oysters raw. There are a number of seafood items that need to be
cooked, like trout, shrimp, sole.
We went to North Dakota when I was about six. My Dad and Uncle traveled
to Lac la Ronge to fish for arctic grayling and char. They were warned
to cook the fish thoroughly because of human transferable worms.
That always stuck with me. Whether it's true or not? 🤔
On 2026-03-31 8:53 p.m., Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
On 2026-03-31, Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:I had a friend who was part Inuit
who introduced me to raw arctic char. If we cook salmon and part of it
is under cooked I'll take it. I have no problems eating scallops or
oysters raw. There are a number of seafood items that need to be
cooked, like trout, shrimp, sole.
We went to North Dakota when I was about six. My Dad and Uncle traveled
to Lac la Ronge to fish for arctic grayling and char. They were warned
to cook the fish thoroughly because of human transferable worms.
That always stuck with me. Whether it's true or not? 🤔
The arctic char I had at my friend's place was from the arctic, probably
too cold to worry about worms. His family up there ate it raw.
On 2026-03-31, Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:
It's weird that some types are flesh are quite enjoyable very rare while
others are not.... or maybe the risk factor is too high. I have no problem with Sashimi. I like grilled tuna that is basically just seared
on the outside and raw in the middle. I had a friend who was part Inuit who introduced me to raw arctic char. If we cook salmon and part of it
is under cooked I'll take it. I have no problems eating scallops or oysters raw. There are a number of seafood items that need to be
cooked, like trout, shrimp, sole.
We went to North Dakota when I was about six. My Dad and Uncle traveled
to Lac la Ronge to fish for arctic grayling and char. They were warned
to cook the fish thoroughly because of human transferable worms.
That always stuck with me. Whether it's true or not? 🤔
Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> posted:
On 2026-03-31, Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:
It's weird that some types are flesh are quite enjoyable very
rare while others are not.... or maybe the risk factor is too
high. I have no problem with Sashimi. I like grilled tuna that
is basically just seared on the outside and raw in the middle. I
had a friend who was part Inuit who introduced me to raw arctic
char. If we cook salmon and part of it is under cooked I'll take
it. I have no problems eating scallops or oysters raw. There are
a number of seafood items that need to be cooked, like trout,
shrimp, sole.
I wonder what the Sam's catch has in it?We went to North Dakota when I was about six. My Dad and Uncle
traveled to Lac la Ronge to fish for arctic grayling and char. They
were warned to cook the fish thoroughly because of human
transferable worms. That always stuck with me. Whether it's true or
not? 🤔
Be afraid, be very afraid.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UM4RNIAnv5s
You'll probably never see this reply because your one of RFC's
goldfish, but anyway.
<AI>[Other garbage deleted]
First, a quick geographical heads-up: Lac la Ronge is actually in
central Saskatchewan, Canada, not North Dakota.
</AI>
On 2026-04-01, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
You'll probably never see this reply because your one of RFC's
goldfish, but anyway.
I'm a goldfish?
<AI>[Other garbage deleted]
First, a quick geographical heads-up: Lac la Ronge is actually in
central Saskatchewan, Canada, not North Dakota.
</AI>
You need a better AI. Saskatchewan is due north of North Dakota and
borders the state. Your AI buddy didn't take that into consideration.
Duh!
First, a quick geographical heads-up: Lac la Ronge is actually in[Other garbage deleted]
central Saskatchewan, Canada, not North Dakota.
</AI>
You need a better AI. Saskatchewan is due north of North Dakota and
borders the state. Your AI buddy didn't take that into consideration.
Duh!
On 2026-04-02 9:30 p.m., Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
First, a quick geographical heads-up: Lac la Ronge is actually in[Other garbage deleted]
central Saskatchewan, Canada, not North Dakota.
</AI>
You need a better AI. Saskatchewan is due north of North Dakota and
borders the state. Your AI buddy didn't take that into consideration.
Duh!
Lac la Ronge is a long way up there, but then it is a long way between
just about two place in Saskatchewan. We have friends who were both born
and raised out there. He used to indicate the distance/driving time
between cities in cases... the number of cases of (24) beer you needed
for the trip. The laws on drinking and driving are a lot tougher now so
you can't drive as far.
Lac la Ronge is a long way up there, but then it is a long way between
just about two place in Saskatchewan. We have friends who were both born
and raised out there. He used to indicate the distance/driving time
between cities in cases... the number of cases of (24) beer you needed
for the trip. The laws on drinking and driving are a lot tougher now so
you can't drive as far.
On 2026-04-03, Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:
Lac la Ronge is a long way up there, but then it is a long way between
just about two place in Saskatchewan. We have friends who were both born
and raised out there. He used to indicate the distance/driving time
between cities in cases... the number of cases of (24) beer you needed
for the trip. The laws on drinking and driving are a lot tougher now so
you can't drive as far.
Hmmm, my friends and I used to do that. It's a long way between towns in Nevada. When a cop came in view, someone always said, "Cop! Act sober!"
That always worked for us. What were the odds?
How far is it to Winnemucca? About a six-pack. [That's per individual]
| Sysop: | Scott Duensing |
|---|---|
| Location: | Freeburg, IL, USA, Earth |
| Users: | 5 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 493259:10:09 |
| Calls: | 5 |
| Messages: | 19,539 |