• Ping: Graham!

    From ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net@user4742@newsgrouper.org.invalid to rec.food.cooking on Tue Dec 2 01:30:27 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking


    I've found you a new wood working project.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/5VZOCNQX91k

    ~
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Graham@g.stereo@shaw.ca to rec.food.cooking on Mon Dec 1 18:38:07 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 2025-12-01 6:30 p.m., ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net wrote:

    I've found you a new wood working project.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/5VZOCNQX91k

    ~
    I like it!!!!
    However, my shop hasn't the range of equipment that he
    has. I'm envious!
    Thanks for posting this intriguing shelving method.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Graham@g.stereo@shaw.ca to rec.food.cooking on Mon Dec 1 18:47:33 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 2025-12-01 6:30 p.m., ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net wrote:

    I've found you a new wood working project.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/5VZOCNQX91k

    ~
    Here are some spherical ring boxes I recently finished: https://postimg.cc/kRJTCZdP

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From jmquown@j_mcquown@comcast.net to rec.food.cooking on Mon Dec 1 21:07:02 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 12/1/2025 8:47 PM, Graham wrote:
    On 2025-12-01 6:30 p.m., ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net wrote:

    I've found you a new wood working project.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/5VZOCNQX91k
    ~
    Here are some spherical ring boxes I recently finished: https://postimg.cc/kRJTCZdP


    Those are fantastic! You do very good work, Graham!

    Jill
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ed P@esp@snet.n to rec.food.cooking on Mon Dec 1 21:48:14 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 12/1/2025 8:47 PM, Graham wrote:
    On 2025-12-01 6:30 p.m., ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net wrote:

    I've found you a new wood working project.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/5VZOCNQX91k
    ~
    Here are some spherical ring boxes I recently finished: https://postimg.cc/kRJTCZdP


    Very nice!

    BTW, I use the tea scoop you made every day. Perfect size for a mug of
    tea.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net@user4742@newsgrouper.org.invalid to rec.food.cooking on Tue Dec 2 03:00:33 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking


    Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> posted:

    On 2025-12-01 6:30 p.m., ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net wrote:

    I've found you a new wood working project.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/5VZOCNQX91k

    ~
    Here are some spherical ring boxes I recently finished: https://postimg.cc/kRJTCZdP


    Oh nice, nice!! Very stunning.

    ~
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Tue Dec 2 09:31:19 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Mon, 1 Dec 2025 18:47:33 -0700
    Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    On 2025-12-01 6:30 p.m., ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net wrote:

    I've found you a new wood working project.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/5VZOCNQX91k

    ~
    Here are some spherical ring boxes I recently finished: https://postimg.cc/kRJTCZdP


    The maple leaf bowl is exceptional too.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Graham@g.stereo@shaw.ca to rec.food.cooking on Tue Dec 2 12:36:14 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 2025-12-01 8:00 p.m., ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net wrote:

    Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> posted:

    On 2025-12-01 6:30 p.m., ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net wrote:

    I've found you a new wood working project.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/5VZOCNQX91k

    ~
    Here are some spherical ring boxes I recently finished:
    https://postimg.cc/kRJTCZdP


    Oh nice, nice!! Very stunning.

    ~
    Thanks, Joan!! I've passed that video to another woodworker
    and also my son. It's a really neat idea.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Graham@g.stereo@shaw.ca to rec.food.cooking on Tue Dec 2 12:36:59 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 2025-12-01 7:07 p.m., jmquown wrote:
    On 12/1/2025 8:47 PM, Graham wrote:
    On 2025-12-01 6:30 p.m., ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net wrote:

    I've found you a new wood working project.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/5VZOCNQX91k
    ~
    Here are some spherical ring boxes I recently finished:
    https://postimg.cc/kRJTCZdP


    Those are fantastic!  You do very good work, Graham!

    Jill
    Thanks, Jill!!. Now I have to find a place to sell them.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Graham@g.stereo@shaw.ca to rec.food.cooking on Tue Dec 2 12:42:01 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 2025-12-01 7:48 p.m., Ed P wrote:
    On 12/1/2025 8:47 PM, Graham wrote:
    On 2025-12-01 6:30 p.m., ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net wrote:

    I've found you a new wood working project.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/5VZOCNQX91k
    ~
    Here are some spherical ring boxes I recently finished:
    https://postimg.cc/kRJTCZdP


    Very nice!

    BTW, I use the tea scoop you made every day.  Perfect size for a mug of tea.
    Thanks, Ed!! I'm really glad that you are using the scoop. I delivered
    some tea caddies to the Tea Trader the other day and President Spray-tan
    has made it too difficult to deliver to the USA at the moment. Not only
    that but Canada Post informed me that if I were to send a xmas present
    to someone in the USA, I would have to pay the duty up front! Of course,
    that doesn't affect commercial operations but apparently the paperwork
    is a nightmare.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bruce@Bruce@invalid.invalid to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 06:47:38 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 12:42:01 -0700, Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    On 2025-12-01 7:48 p.m., Ed P wrote:
    On 12/1/2025 8:47 PM, Graham wrote:
    On 2025-12-01 6:30 p.m., ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net wrote:

    I've found you a new wood working project.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/5VZOCNQX91k
    ~
    Here are some spherical ring boxes I recently finished:
    https://postimg.cc/kRJTCZdP

    Very nice!

    BTW, I use the tea scoop you made every day.  Perfect size for a mug of
    tea.
    Thanks, Ed!! I'm really glad that you are using the scoop. I delivered
    some tea caddies to the Tea Trader the other day and President Spray-tan
    has made it too difficult to deliver to the USA at the moment. Not only
    that but Canada Post informed me that if I were to send a xmas present
    to someone in the USA, I would have to pay the duty up front! Of course, >that doesn't affect commercial operations but apparently the paperwork
    is a nightmare.

    Aren't gifts Trump Tariff exempt?
    --
    Bruce <https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/gettyimages-681946574-20250717233334800.jpg>
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dave Smith@adavid.smith@sympatico.ca to rec.food.cooking on Tue Dec 2 15:05:59 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 2025-12-02 2:42 p.m., Graham wrote:
    On 2025-12-01 7:48 p.m., Ed P wrote:


    Very nice!

    BTW, I use the tea scoop you made every day.  Perfect size for a mug
    of tea.
    Thanks, Ed!! I'm really glad that you are using the scoop. I delivered
    some tea caddies to the Tea Trader the other day and President Spray-tan
    has made it too difficult to deliver to the USA at the moment. Not only
    that but Canada Post informed me that if I were to send a xmas present
    to someone in the USA, I would have to pay the duty up front! Of course, that doesn't affect commercial operations but apparently the paperwork
    is a nightmare.

    According to someone I know who works at the border a lot of people are getting shafted on the duty by shippers. They are charging them on just
    about everything whether or not they are actually subject to tariffs and duties. They take the money up front and pocket whatever does not have
    to be paid.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Tue Dec 2 14:12:01 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 12:42:01 -0700
    Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    President Spray-tan
    has made it too difficult to deliver to the USA at the moment.

    Has he really?

    At first blush you might think so:

    "Wood and furniture products: There are new tariffs on certain wood and furniture products. Softwood lumber: 10% duty
    Upholstered wooden products: 25% duty
    Kitchen cabinets and vanities: 25% duty, with plans to increase to 50%
    in 2026"

    I don't see wood bowls listed.

    They're 'art' objects imoh.

    AI Overview
    "Shipping artwork from a Canadian small business to the USA involves
    potential tariffs, as the previous duty-free de minimis exemption for
    shipments under $800 USD has been eliminated. However, //original
    artworks are generally duty-free, and Canadian-made items may be exempt
    from new tariffs// if they meet the conditions of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). "

    I think you just don't want to do the legwork on this, so much easier to
    blame Trump than Carney the protectionist barker, isn't it?

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Tue Dec 2 14:12:32 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Wed, 03 Dec 2025 06:47:38 +1100
    Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 12:42:01 -0700, Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    On 2025-12-01 7:48 p.m., Ed P wrote:
    On 12/1/2025 8:47 PM, Graham wrote:
    On 2025-12-01 6:30 p.m., ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net wrote:

    I've found you a new wood working project.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/5VZOCNQX91k
    ~
    Here are some spherical ring boxes I recently finished:
    https://postimg.cc/kRJTCZdP

    Very nice!

    BTW, I use the tea scoop you made every day.  Perfect size for a
    mug of tea.
    Thanks, Ed!! I'm really glad that you are using the scoop. I
    delivered some tea caddies to the Tea Trader the other day and
    President Spray-tan has made it too difficult to deliver to the USA
    at the moment. Not only that but Canada Post informed me that if I
    were to send a xmas present to someone in the USA, I would have to
    pay the duty up front! Of course, that doesn't affect commercial
    operations but apparently the paperwork is a nightmare.

    Aren't gifts Trump Tariff exempt?

    Righteeo!
    AI Overview
    Shipping artwork from a Canadian small business to the USA involves
    potential tariffs, as the previous duty-free de minimis exemption for
    shipments under $800 USD has been eliminated. However, original
    artworks are generally duty-free, and Canadian-made items may be exempt
    from new tariffs if they meet the conditions of the United
    States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bruce@Bruce@invalid.invalid to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 08:23:58 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 14:12:01 -0700, lomonosov <bubbles@in.valid> wrote:

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 12:42:01 -0700
    Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    President Spray-tan
    has made it too difficult to deliver to the USA at the moment.

    Has he really?

    At first blush you might think so:

    "Wood and furniture products: There are new tariffs on certain wood and >furniture products. Softwood lumber: 10% duty
    Upholstered wooden products: 25% duty
    Kitchen cabinets and vanities: 25% duty, with plans to increase to 50%
    in 2026"

    I don't see wood bowls listed.

    They're 'art' objects imoh.

    AI Overview
    "Shipping artwork from a Canadian small business to the USA involves >potential tariffs, as the previous duty-free de minimis exemption for >shipments under $800 USD has been eliminated. However, //original
    artworks are generally duty-free, and Canadian-made items may be exempt
    from new tariffs// if they meet the conditions of the United >States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). "

    I think you just don't want to do the legwork on this, so much easier to >blame Trump than Carney the protectionist barker, isn't it?

    Trump made a huge mess with his tariffs. The man is too dumb to poop
    and so are the people who vote for him.
    --
    Bruce <https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/gettyimages-681946574-20250717233334800.jpg>
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bruce@Bruce@invalid.invalid to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 08:24:53 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 14:12:32 -0700, lomonosov <bubbles@in.valid> wrote:

    On Wed, 03 Dec 2025 06:47:38 +1100
    Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 12:42:01 -0700, Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    On 2025-12-01 7:48 p.m., Ed P wrote:
    On 12/1/2025 8:47 PM, Graham wrote:
    On 2025-12-01 6:30 p.m., ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net wrote:

    I've found you a new wood working project.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/5VZOCNQX91k
    ~
    Here are some spherical ring boxes I recently finished:
    https://postimg.cc/kRJTCZdP

    Very nice!

    BTW, I use the tea scoop you made every day.  Perfect size for a
    mug of tea.
    Thanks, Ed!! I'm really glad that you are using the scoop. I
    delivered some tea caddies to the Tea Trader the other day and
    President Spray-tan has made it too difficult to deliver to the USA
    at the moment. Not only that but Canada Post informed me that if I
    were to send a xmas present to someone in the USA, I would have to
    pay the duty up front! Of course, that doesn't affect commercial
    operations but apparently the paperwork is a nightmare.

    Aren't gifts Trump Tariff exempt?


    Righteeo!

    AI Overview
    Shipping artwork from a Canadian small business to the USA involves
    potential tariffs, as the previous duty-free de minimis exemption for >shipments under $800 USD has been eliminated. However, original
    artworks are generally duty-free, and Canadian-made items may be exempt
    from new tariffs if they meet the conditions of the United >States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

    The question is whether something's a gift or a commercially sold
    item.
    --
    Bruce <https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/gettyimages-681946574-20250717233334800.jpg>
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Tue Dec 2 14:28:16 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Wed, 03 Dec 2025 08:23:58 +1100
    Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 14:12:01 -0700, lomonosov <bubbles@in.valid> wrote:

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 12:42:01 -0700
    Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    President Spray-tan
    has made it too difficult to deliver to the USA at the moment.

    Has he really?

    At first blush you might think so:

    "Wood and furniture products: There are new tariffs on certain wood
    and furniture products. Softwood lumber: 10% duty
    Upholstered wooden products: 25% duty
    Kitchen cabinets and vanities: 25% duty, with plans to increase to
    50% in 2026"

    I don't see wood bowls listed.

    They're 'art' objects imoh.

    AI Overview
    "Shipping artwork from a Canadian small business to the USA involves >potential tariffs, as the previous duty-free de minimis exemption for >shipments under $800 USD has been eliminated. However, //original
    artworks are generally duty-free, and Canadian-made items may be
    exempt from new tariffs// if they meet the conditions of the United >States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). "

    I think you just don't want to do the legwork on this, so much
    easier to blame Trump than Carney the protectionist barker, isn't
    it?

    Trump made a huge mess with his tariffs.

    Not for us he didn't.

    The man is too dumb to poop
    and so are the people who vote for him.

    NATO freleoaders also got the tab - FINALLY!

    Results under Trump's first term: During and after Trump's first presidency, non-U.S. NATO members significantly increased their defense budgets. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg credited Trump's focus with bringing a "new sense of urgency" and a substantial rise in spending. By 2024, a record number of countries (23 out of 32) were expected to meet or exceed the 2% target, up from only three in 2014.
    The New 5% Commitment
    At a summit in The Hague in June 2025, NATO leaders formally agreed to a new, more ambitious spending goal of 5% of GDP on defense and security by 2035. This new figure is broken down into:
    3.5% for core military needs (troops, weapons, etc.), an increase from the previous 2% target.
    1.5% for "militarily adjacent" projects such as improving infrastructure (roads, bridges, ports), cybersecurity, and civic resilience.
    This new commitment was widely seen as a major political victory for
    Trump, who had been pushing for the higher number. Spain was the only
    nation to initially raise reservations about the 5% target, though it
    later signed the joint statement.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Tue Dec 2 14:34:56 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Wed, 03 Dec 2025 08:24:53 +1100
    Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 14:12:32 -0700, lomonosov <bubbles@in.valid> wrote:

    On Wed, 03 Dec 2025 06:47:38 +1100
    Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 12:42:01 -0700, Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    On 2025-12-01 7:48 p.m., Ed P wrote:
    On 12/1/2025 8:47 PM, Graham wrote:
    On 2025-12-01 6:30 p.m., ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net wrote:

    I've found you a new wood working project.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/5VZOCNQX91k
    ~
    Here are some spherical ring boxes I recently finished:
    https://postimg.cc/kRJTCZdP

    Very nice!

    BTW, I use the tea scoop you made every day.  Perfect size for a
    mug of tea.
    Thanks, Ed!! I'm really glad that you are using the scoop. I
    delivered some tea caddies to the Tea Trader the other day and
    President Spray-tan has made it too difficult to deliver to the
    USA at the moment. Not only that but Canada Post informed me that
    if I were to send a xmas present to someone in the USA, I would
    have to pay the duty up front! Of course, that doesn't affect
    commercial operations but apparently the paperwork is a
    nightmare.

    Aren't gifts Trump Tariff exempt?


    Righteeo!

    AI Overview
    Shipping artwork from a Canadian small business to the USA involves >potential tariffs, as the previous duty-free de minimis exemption for >shipments under $800 USD has been eliminated. However, original
    artworks are generally duty-free, and Canadian-made items may be
    exempt from new tariffs if they meet the conditions of the United >States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

    The question is whether something's a gift or a commercially sold
    item.

    Did you read the USMCA?
    Are there any exceptions to USMCA rules?
    To qualify for USMCA tariff exemptions, products must meet detailed
    rules of origin. The two main requirements are: Regional Value Content
    (RVC): A minimum percentage of the product's value must originate from
    USMCA countries. For example, vehicles must contain at least 75%
    regional content to qualify.Jun 12, 2025
    Do tariffs apply to gifts?
    AI Overview
    Sending to USA? No problem. Gifts under $100 are tariff free ...
    Yes, tariffs can apply to gifts, but they are often exempt up to a
    certain value, provided certain conditions are met. In the United
    States, gifts valued at $100 or less are typically exempt from duties
    and taxes, as long as they are sent from one individual to another and
    the recipient doesn't receive more than that amount in a single day. If
    a gift exceeds this value or is sent commercially, tariffs will likely
    apply.
    People also ask
    Is artwork exempt from US tariffs?
    AI Overview
    Yes, original works of art are generally exempt from U.S. tariffs, as
    they are classified as "informational materials" under a 1977 federal
    law. However, this exemption requires specific criteria to be met, and
    other items like decorative objects, furniture, or mass-produced prints
    are not exempt and may be subject to tariffs. It is crucial to properly document and declare the item as "original art" to ensure it receives
    duty-free treatment.
    Is there customs duty on artwork?
    Original works of art (i.e. paintings, drawings, pastels, collages and decorative plaques) with or without their frames are duty-free under
    Chapter 97 in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS).Nov 4, 2025 https://www.helpspanish.cbp.gov/s/article/Article-1146?language=en_US
    Importing personal and commercial original works of art

    Original works of art (i.e. paintings, drawings, pastels, collages and decorative plaques) with or without their frames are duty-free under Chapter 97 in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS). However, if the frame is not of a value considered normal for the work of art, it will have to be classified separately under its applicable provision and may be dutiable. These original works of art, whether ancient or modern, must be executed entirely by hand.
    Drawings for architectural, engineering, industrial, commercial, topographical purposes are not eligible for the original works of art heading, but are duty-free under Heading 4906, provided they are from a Column 1 country that has Normal Trade Relations status with the United States. Heading 9701 also does not apply to hand-painted or hand-decorated manufactured articles, such as wall coverings consisting of hand-painted woven fabrics, holiday souvenirs, boxes and ceramic wares (i.e. plates, dishes, vases, etc.) Original engravings, prints and lithographs are also duty free under heading 9702. Sculptures of any material are duty free under 9703.
    If entering works of art commercially at a land border and the value is under $2500, use CBP Form CF-7523. If the item is valued over $2500 formal entry through a Customs Broker and ACE manifest is required. Personal importation can be done by an oral declaration at a Port of Entry.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ed P@esp@snet.n to rec.food.cooking on Tue Dec 2 16:38:15 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 12/2/2025 4:12 PM, lomonosov wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 12:42:01 -0700
    Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    President Spray-tan
    has made it too difficult to deliver to the USA at the moment.

    Has he really?

    At first blush you might think so:

    "Wood and furniture products: There are new tariffs on certain wood and furniture products. Softwood lumber: 10% duty
    Upholstered wooden products: 25% duty
    Kitchen cabinets and vanities: 25% duty, with plans to increase to 50%
    in 2026"

    I don't see wood bowls listed.

    They're 'art' objects imoh.

    AI Overview
    "Shipping artwork from a Canadian small business to the USA involves potential tariffs, as the previous duty-free de minimis exemption for shipments under $800 USD has been eliminated. However, //original
    artworks are generally duty-free, and Canadian-made items may be exempt
    from new tariffs// if they meet the conditions of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). "

    I think you just don't want to do the legwork on this, so much easier to blame Trump than Carney the protectionist barker, isn't it?


    You make it sound simple, but it is not. Yes, the blame goes to the guy
    that started the tariffs. Small businesses are getting hurt, as well as buyers. I can no longer buy from a favorite source.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From heyjoe@nobody@home.invalid to rec.food.cooking on Tue Dec 2 21:41:29 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    Now I have to find a place to sell them.

    If ‘twere me, I’d start with a couple of popular jewelers. Nice gift to accompany a new ring.
    --
    Everyone has the right to be stupid.
    But some people abuse the privilege.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Tue Dec 2 14:50:16 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 16:38:15 -0500
    Ed P <esp@snet.n> wrote:

    On 12/2/2025 4:12 PM, lomonosov wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 12:42:01 -0700
    Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    President Spray-tan
    has made it too difficult to deliver to the USA at the moment.

    Has he really?

    At first blush you might think so:

    "Wood and furniture products: There are new tariffs on certain wood
    and furniture products. Softwood lumber: 10% duty
    Upholstered wooden products: 25% duty
    Kitchen cabinets and vanities: 25% duty, with plans to increase to
    50% in 2026"

    I don't see wood bowls listed.

    They're 'art' objects imoh.

    AI Overview
    "Shipping artwork from a Canadian small business to the USA involves potential tariffs, as the previous duty-free de minimis exemption
    for shipments under $800 USD has been eliminated. However,
    //original artworks are generally duty-free, and Canadian-made
    items may be exempt from new tariffs// if they meet the conditions
    of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). "

    I think you just don't want to do the legwork on this, so much
    easier to blame Trump than Carney the protectionist barker, isn't
    it?

    You make it sound simple, but it is not.

    Are you Canajun?

    Yes, the blame goes to the guy that started the tariffs.

    That would be to each trade protectionist foreign nation that hit us
    with import duties first, and for many decades too.


    Small businesses are getting hurt, as well as buyers.

    Anecdotal.


    I can no longer buy from a favorite source.

    Anecdotal.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Tue Dec 2 14:51:14 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 21:41:29 -0000 (UTC)
    heyjoe <nobody@home.invalid> wrote:
    Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    Now I have to find a place to sell them.

    If ‘twere me, I’d start with a couple of popular jewelers. Nice gift
    to accompany a new ring.


    Canajun jewelers = duty free sales!
    Sound advice.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dave Smith@adavid.smith@sympatico.ca to rec.food.cooking on Tue Dec 2 16:59:50 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 2025-12-02 4:12 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 12:42:01 -0700


    I think you just don't want to do the legwork on this, so much easier to blame Trump than Carney the protectionist barker, isn't it?


    Of course you don't want to do the legwork. You might be called to task
    to provide examples of Carney's protectionism. Trump has a pickle up his
    butt about the supply management system that Canada uses to stabilize
    supplies and prices. It provides stability for the farmers. There is provision for pretty steep tariffs on imported dairy products but not
    until they exceed a certain threshold. No one has ever paid any of those tariffs because they have imported enough American dairy to even come
    close to having to pay.

    Meanwhile the US government subsidizes it's agriculture sector allowing
    it to dump it's products in other countries.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net@user4742@newsgrouper.org.invalid to rec.food.cooking on Tue Dec 2 22:06:22 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking


    Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> posted:

    On 2025-12-01 8:00 p.m., ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net wrote:

    Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> posted:

    On 2025-12-01 6:30 p.m., ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net wrote:

    I've found you a new wood working project.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/5VZOCNQX91k


    Here are some spherical ring boxes I recently finished:
    https://postimg.cc/kRJTCZdP


    Oh nice, nice!! Very stunning.


    Thanks, Joan!! I've passed that video to another woodworker
    and also my son. It's a really neat idea.


    You're welcome and I must admit about the only thing I know about
    'bending wood' is that stuff that is sometimes called 'wacky wood.'
    It's thin wood that can be used for barrel ceilings in homes. Oh,
    and splinters, I know about splinters. 😣

    ~
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jim@jim@invalid.none to rec.food.cooking on Tue Dec 2 17:13:38 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    In article <sjJXQ.58719$fEH6.39978@fx41.iad>, adavid.smith@sympatico.ca says...

    On 2025-12-02 4:12 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 12:42:01 -0700


    I think you just don't want to do the legwork on this, so much easier to blame Trump than Carney the protectionist barker, isn't it?


    Of course you don't want to do the legwork.


    https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/07/business/carney-trump-tariff-meeting

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ed P@esp@snet.n to rec.food.cooking on Tue Dec 2 17:38:56 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 12/2/2025 4:50 PM, lomonosov wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 16:38:15 -0500
    Ed P <esp@snet.n> wrote:

    On 12/2/2025 4:12 PM, lomonosov wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 12:42:01 -0700
    Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    President Spray-tan
    has made it too difficult to deliver to the USA at the moment.

    Has he really?

    At first blush you might think so:

    "Wood and furniture products: There are new tariffs on certain wood
    and furniture products. Softwood lumber: 10% duty
    Upholstered wooden products: 25% duty
    Kitchen cabinets and vanities: 25% duty, with plans to increase to
    50% in 2026"

    I don't see wood bowls listed.

    They're 'art' objects imoh.

    AI Overview
    "Shipping artwork from a Canadian small business to the USA involves
    potential tariffs, as the previous duty-free de minimis exemption
    for shipments under $800 USD has been eliminated. However,
    //original artworks are generally duty-free, and Canadian-made
    items may be exempt from new tariffs// if they meet the conditions
    of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). "

    I think you just don't want to do the legwork on this, so much
    easier to blame Trump than Carney the protectionist barker, isn't
    it?

    You make it sound simple, but it is not.

    Are you Canajun?

    Yes, the blame goes to the guy that started the tariffs.

    That would be to each trade protectionist foreign nation that hit us
    with import duties first, and for many decades too.


    Small businesses are getting hurt, as well as buyers.

    Anecdotal.


    I can no longer buy from a favorite source.

    Anecdotal.


    I've been buying from Tea Traded for about 12 years. Not they cannot
    easily ship to the US. Yes, that is my true anecdote. It worked until
    Trump effed up.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bruce@Bruce@invalid.invalid to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 09:44:38 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 14:28:16 -0700, lomonosov <bubbles@in.valid> wrote:

    On Wed, 03 Dec 2025 08:23:58 +1100
    Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 14:12:01 -0700, lomonosov <bubbles@in.valid> wrote:

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 12:42:01 -0700
    Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    President Spray-tan
    has made it too difficult to deliver to the USA at the moment.

    Has he really?

    At first blush you might think so:

    "Wood and furniture products: There are new tariffs on certain wood
    and furniture products. Softwood lumber: 10% duty
    Upholstered wooden products: 25% duty
    Kitchen cabinets and vanities: 25% duty, with plans to increase to
    50% in 2026"

    I don't see wood bowls listed.

    They're 'art' objects imoh.

    AI Overview
    "Shipping artwork from a Canadian small business to the USA involves
    potential tariffs, as the previous duty-free de minimis exemption for
    shipments under $800 USD has been eliminated. However, //original
    artworks are generally duty-free, and Canadian-made items may be
    exempt from new tariffs// if they meet the conditions of the United
    States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). "

    I think you just don't want to do the legwork on this, so much
    easier to blame Trump than Carney the protectionist barker, isn't
    it?

    Trump made a huge mess with his tariffs.

    Not for us he didn't.

    You're paying the tariffs. It's basically tax.

    The man is too dumb to poop
    and so are the people who vote for him.

    NATO freleoaders also got the tab - FINALLY!

    That's one thing I agree with. Also because of Putin's behaviour.
    --
    Bruce <https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/gettyimages-681946574-20250717233334800.jpg>
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bruce@Bruce@invalid.invalid to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 09:46:32 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 14:34:56 -0700, lomonosov <bubbles@in.valid> wrote:

    On Wed, 03 Dec 2025 08:24:53 +1100
    Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    The question is whether something's a gift or a commercially sold
    item.

    Did you read the USMCA?

    Are there any exceptions to USMCA rules?
    To qualify for USMCA tariff exemptions, products must meet detailed
    rules of origin. The two main requirements are: Regional Value Content
    (RVC): A minimum percentage of the product's value must originate from
    USMCA countries. For example, vehicles must contain at least 75%
    regional content to qualify.Jun 12, 2025

    Do tariffs apply to gifts?
    AI Overview
    Sending to USA? No problem. Gifts under $100 are tariff free ...
    Yes, tariffs can apply to gifts, but they are often exempt up to a
    certain value, provided certain conditions are met. In the United
    States, gifts valued at $100 or less are typically exempt from duties
    and taxes, as long as they are sent from one individual to another and
    the recipient doesn't receive more than that amount in a single day. If
    a gift exceeds this value or is sent commercially, tariffs will likely
    apply.

    So gifts are exempt, as I said.
    --
    Bruce <https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/gettyimages-681946574-20250717233334800.jpg>
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bruce@Bruce@invalid.invalid to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 09:54:26 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Wed, 03 Dec 2025 09:44:38 +1100, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 14:28:16 -0700, lomonosov <bubbles@in.valid> wrote:

    On Wed, 03 Dec 2025 08:23:58 +1100
    Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 14:12:01 -0700, lomonosov <bubbles@in.valid> wrote:

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 12:42:01 -0700
    Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    President Spray-tan
    has made it too difficult to deliver to the USA at the moment.

    Has he really?

    At first blush you might think so:

    "Wood and furniture products: There are new tariffs on certain wood
    and furniture products. Softwood lumber: 10% duty
    Upholstered wooden products: 25% duty
    Kitchen cabinets and vanities: 25% duty, with plans to increase to
    50% in 2026"

    I don't see wood bowls listed.

    They're 'art' objects imoh.

    AI Overview
    "Shipping artwork from a Canadian small business to the USA involves
    potential tariffs, as the previous duty-free de minimis exemption for
    shipments under $800 USD has been eliminated. However, //original
    artworks are generally duty-free, and Canadian-made items may be
    exempt from new tariffs// if they meet the conditions of the United
    States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). "

    I think you just don't want to do the legwork on this, so much
    easier to blame Trump than Carney the protectionist barker, isn't
    it?

    Trump made a huge mess with his tariffs.

    Not for us he didn't.

    You're paying the tariffs. It's basically tax.

    The man is too dumb to poop
    and so are the people who vote for him.

    NATO freleoaders also got the tab - FINALLY!

    That's one thing I agree with. Also because of Putin's behaviour.

    Countries that are not making the currently agreed 2% of GDP payment
    to NATO:
    Spain, Canada, Belgium, Luxembourg, Slovenia, Italy, Portugal,
    Croatia.
    --
    Bruce <https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/gettyimages-681946574-20250717233334800.jpg>
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From jmquown@j_mcquown@comcast.net to rec.food.cooking on Tue Dec 2 18:29:42 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 12/2/2025 2:42 PM, Graham wrote:
    On 2025-12-01 7:48 p.m., Ed P wrote:
    On 12/1/2025 8:47 PM, Graham wrote:
    On 2025-12-01 6:30 p.m., ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net wrote:

    I've found you a new wood working project.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/5VZOCNQX91k
    ~
    Here are some spherical ring boxes I recently finished:
    https://postimg.cc/kRJTCZdP


    Very nice!

    BTW, I use the tea scoop you made every day.  Perfect size for a mug
    of tea.
    Thanks, Ed!! I'm really glad that you are using the scoop. I delivered
    some tea caddies to the Tea Trader the other day and President Spray-tan
    has made it too difficult to deliver to the USA at the moment. Not only
    that but Canada Post informed me that if I were to send a xmas present
    to someone in the USA, I would have to pay the duty up front! Of course, that doesn't affect commercial operations but apparently the paperwork
    is a nightmare.

    That's so sad. Those tariffs are ridiculous.

    Jill
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From jmquown@j_mcquown@comcast.net to rec.food.cooking on Tue Dec 2 18:32:30 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 12/2/2025 4:41 PM, heyjoe wrote:
    Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    Now I have to find a place to sell them.

    If ‘twere me, I’d start with a couple of popular jewelers. Nice gift to accompany a new ring.


    Now that's a nice idea. Ring or not, perhaps they are looking for a
    pretty and unique hand crafted gift for someone. They might be willing
    to display them in the store.

    Jill
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bryan Simmons@bryangsimmons@gmail.com to rec.food.cooking on Tue Dec 2 19:19:04 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 12/2/2025 1:42 PM, Graham wrote:
    On 2025-12-01 7:48 p.m., Ed P wrote:
    On 12/1/2025 8:47 PM, Graham wrote:
    On 2025-12-01 6:30 p.m., ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net wrote:

    I've found you a new wood working project.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/5VZOCNQX91k
    ~
    Here are some spherical ring boxes I recently finished:
    https://postimg.cc/kRJTCZdP


    Very nice!

    BTW, I use the tea scoop you made every day.  Perfect size for a mug
    of tea.
    Thanks, Ed!! I'm really glad that you are using the scoop. I delivered
    some tea caddies to the Tea Trader the other day and President Spray-tan
    has made it too difficult to deliver to the USA at the moment. Not only
    that but Canada Post informed me that if I were to send a xmas present
    to someone in the USA, I would have to pay the duty up front! Of course, that doesn't affect commercial operations but apparently the paperwork
    is a nightmare.

    There are folks who voted for "President Spray-tan" THREE TIMES. Anyone
    who did so is a PIECE OF SHIT. What he did to Canada is bad, but what he
    did to the USA is far worse. Anyone who treats those pieces of shit with anything better than contempt is part of the problem.

    Hey, I'm all for repentance and forgiveness, but there's no forgiveness
    w/o repentance. Most of these stupid MAGA folks are ostensibly
    Christian, so they should understand that concept unless they're stupid.
    OOPS, we already figured they were stupid. Part of it, you can bet, is
    that the idea of a negro woman as president...

    Their "Spray-tan" PIECE OF SHIT is sexual predator, a racist, a guy who
    mocks disabled persons, and who has been Hellbent upon destroying our
    most distinguished scientific institutions. This sociopath has gone on
    the warpath against Canada and Mexico.

    Why the fuck should any PIECE OF SHIT MAGA person be treated with respect?
    --
    --Bryan https://www.instagram.com/bryangsimmons/

    For your safety and protection, this sig. has been thoroughly
    tested on laboratory animals.

    "Most of the food described here is nauseating.
    We're just too courteous to say so."
    -- Cindy Hamilton
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bruce@Bruce@invalid.invalid to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 13:03:47 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 19:19:04 -0600, Bryan Simmons
    <bryangsimmons@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 12/2/2025 1:42 PM, Graham wrote:

    Thanks, Ed!! I'm really glad that you are using the scoop. I delivered
    some tea caddies to the Tea Trader the other day and President Spray-tan
    has made it too difficult to deliver to the USA at the moment. Not only
    that but Canada Post informed me that if I were to send a xmas present
    to someone in the USA, I would have to pay the duty up front! Of course,
    that doesn't affect commercial operations but apparently the paperwork
    is a nightmare.

    There are folks who voted for "President Spray-tan" THREE TIMES. Anyone
    who did so is a PIECE OF SHIT. What he did to Canada is bad, but what he
    did to the USA is far worse. Anyone who treats those pieces of shit with >anything better than contempt is part of the problem.

    Hey, I'm all for repentance and forgiveness, but there's no forgiveness
    w/o repentance. Most of these stupid MAGA folks are ostensibly
    Christian, so they should understand that concept unless they're stupid. >OOPS, we already figured they were stupid. Part of it, you can bet, is
    that the idea of a negro woman as president...

    Their "Spray-tan" PIECE OF SHIT is sexual predator, a racist, a guy who >mocks disabled persons, and who has been Hellbent upon destroying our
    most distinguished scientific institutions. This sociopath has gone on
    the warpath against Canada and Mexico.

    Why the fuck should any PIECE OF SHIT MAGA person be treated with respect?

    A few years ago, the Dutch Evangelical Channel wanted to know why
    their American brethren and sisters voted for Trump. They asked them.
    It turned out that one of their main reasons to vote for Trump is that
    (he says) he's against abortion. I specifically remember one quote
    from the Americans: "We know Trump's not perfect, but if God chose him
    to do His work, who are we to say No?"
    --
    Bruce <https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/gettyimages-681946574-20250717233334800.jpg>
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Cindy Hamilton@chamilton5280@invalid.com to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 09:46:28 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 2025-12-03, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    A few years ago, the Dutch Evangelical Channel wanted to know why
    their American brethren and sisters voted for Trump. They asked them.
    It turned out that one of their main reasons to vote for Trump is that
    (he says) he's against abortion. I specifically remember one quote
    from the Americans: "We know Trump's not perfect, but if God chose him
    to do His work, who are we to say No?"

    Trump will say anything to anybody in order to get what he wants.
    Once he has what he wants, he discards them like a used tissue.
    --
    Cindy Hamilton
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bruce@Bruce@invalid.invalid to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 20:54:40 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 09:46:28 -0000 (UTC), Cindy Hamilton <chamilton5280@invalid.com> wrote:

    On 2025-12-03, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    A few years ago, the Dutch Evangelical Channel wanted to know why
    their American brethren and sisters voted for Trump. They asked them.
    It turned out that one of their main reasons to vote for Trump is that
    (he says) he's against abortion. I specifically remember one quote
    from the Americans: "We know Trump's not perfect, but if God chose him
    to do His work, who are we to say No?"

    Trump will say anything to anybody in order to get what he wants.
    Once he has what he wants, he discards them like a used tissue.

    Yes, and the used tissues don't realise it. Still DO NOT realise it.
    It's difficult to believe.
    --
    Bruce <https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/gettyimages-681946574-20250717233334800.jpg>
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dave Smith@adavid.smith@sympatico.ca to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 09:22:04 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 2025-12-03 4:46 a.m., Cindy Hamilton wrote:
    On 2025-12-03, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    A few years ago, the Dutch Evangelical Channel wanted to know why
    their American brethren and sisters voted for Trump. They asked them.
    It turned out that one of their main reasons to vote for Trump is that
    (he says) he's against abortion. I specifically remember one quote
    from the Americans: "We know Trump's not perfect, but if God chose him
    to do His work, who are we to say No?"

    Trump will say anything to anybody in order to get what he wants.
    Once he has what he wants, he discards them like a used tissue.



    We saw that on the news last night when they were being confronted about ordering a second strike on an alleged drug running boat. When the heat
    was turned up it they threw the naval commander under the bus. They
    need to be reminded that just following orders didn't work at the
    Nuremburg trials.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 10:31:23 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 16:59:50 -0500
    Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:
    On 2025-12-02 4:12 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 12:42:01 -0700


    I think you just don't want to do the legwork on this, so much
    easier to blame Trump than Carney the protectionist barker, isn't
    it?

    Of course you don't want to do the legwork. You might be called to
    task to provide examples of Carney's protectionism.
    Ottawa calling from across the divide: https://www.pm.gc.ca/en/news/news-releases/2025/11/26/prime-minister-carney-announces-new-measures-protect-and-transform
    November 26, 2025
    Ottawa, Ontario
    The world is changing rapidly. The United States, the world’s largest economy, is fundamentally reshaping all its trade relationships, causing major disruption and upheaval for Canadians. It is time to transform our economy from one that is reliant on a single trade partner to one that is stronger, more self-sufficient, and resilient to global shocks. That means working with urgency and determination to transform our strategic industries so they can adapt, compete, and win in this new global environment.
    Canada’s new government has moved quickly to protect and strengthen the sectors most affected by U.S. tariffs – introducing new measures to help workers gain new skills, support businesses as they modernise and diversify, and boost domestic demand for Canadian goods. As we build the economy of the future, we’re ensuring workers and industries are ready to seize its opportunities.
    Building on previously announced measures to help transform the Canadian steel and softwood lumber industries, the following new initiatives were announced today.
    Canada’s new government will:
    Further limit foreign steel imports to ensure that Canadian steel producers have better access to the domestic market
    Canada will tighten the tariff rate quota levels for steel products from non-free trade agreement (FTA) partners from 50% to 20% of 2024 levels.
    For non-CUSMA partners with which we have an FTA, Canada will reduce tariff rate quota levels for steel products from 100% to 75% of 2024 levels.
    Canada will impose a global 25% tariff on targeted imported steel-derivative products such as wind towers, prefabricated buildings, fasteners, and wires.
    Canada will also toughen our border measures to combat foreign steel dumping and verify compliance with applicable surtaxes. To do so, we will equip the Canada Border Services Agency with a dedicated steel compliance team, enhanced detection of false declarations, and an expanded online reporting tool.
    To move away from relying on imported steel and to give Canadian companies time to adjust their supply chains to use Canadian steel, the temporary remission of Canadian tariffs on imports will end on January 31, 2026, for steel used in Canada for manufacturing, food and beverage packaging, and agricultural production.
    These measures will boost the competitiveness of Canadian steel producers by protecting them against trade diversion. They will also unlock over $1 billion in new domestic demand for Canadian steel.

    Make it easier to build with Canadian steel and Canadian lumber
    To make it more affordable to transport Canadian steel and lumber across the country, Canada will work with railway companies to cut freight rates for transporting Canadian steel and lumber interprovincially by 50%, beginning in Spring 2026.
    To maximise the use of Canadian softwood lumber in housing, Build Canada Homes will prioritise shovel-ready, multi-year projects that can begin within 12 months and that use Canadian wood products.
    With a funding allocation of roughly $700 million next year, Build Canada Homes – our new federal homebuilding agency – alone will create $70 to $140 million of new demand for Canadian wood products – and attract private and provincial capital to multiply its impact.
    Finally, Canada’s new government will implement our Buy Canadian Policy later this year, which requires that all contracts worth over $25 million prioritise Canadian materials – including steel and lumber. This will also apply across federal grants and contributions programs.

    Increase protections for Canadian steel and lumber workers and businesses so they can adapt and thrive in this new global landscape
    Canada will earmark more than $100 million over two years, starting in 2025-2026, in program costs to provide support to eligible employers in all sectors with an active Work-Sharing agreement and who commit to supporting training for employees working reduced hours. This measure will increase the income replacement for eligible workers, helping up to 26,000 Canadian workers in various sectors, including steel and lumber.
    To ensure companies have the financing and credit support they need to maintain and restructure their operations during this period of transformation, Canada will provide an additional $500 million to the Business Development Bank of Canada (BDC) Softwood Lumber Guarantee Program.
    To support softwood lumber firms facing liquidity pressures, Canada will earmark $500 million in funding under the Large Enterprise Tariff Loan facility.
    To make it easier for the forestry sector to access federal support, we will establish a single window to applications – a one-stop shop to help companies navigate our suite of support programs.
    To examine and report on how the forest industry can maintain its competitiveness over the long-term, Canada will launch a Canadian Forest Sector Transformation Task Force. This Task Force will seek input and recommendations from provinces, territories, and industry on managing the sector’s transformation.
    At this critical moment in Canada’s history, we are moving from reliance to resilience. Using Canadian steel and Canadian lumber, we will build Canada strong.
    Trump has a
    pickle up his butt about the supply management system
    You misspelled trade protectionism again.
    that Canada
    uses to stabilize supplies and prices. It provides stability for the
    farmers. There is provision for pretty steep tariffs on imported
    dairy products but not until they exceed a certain threshold.
    So it _IS_ trade protectionism then.
    No one
    has ever paid any of those tariffs because they have imported enough
    American dairy to even come close to having to pay.
    Whilst dumping Canajun dairy into our markets?
    Eh? https://www.farmprogress.com/management/does-canada-really-charge-a-270-tariff-on-milk-
    Does Canada really charge 270% on milk?
    On some dairy imports, yes. Canada essentially allows two avenues for dairy imports -- those within quota, and surplus stuff. It’s the latter where tariffs spike, because Canada’s whole system is built to avoid a surplus -- hence its name, “supply management.”
    Take milk, for instance. Within quota, the tariff is 7.5%. Over-quota
    milk faces a 241% tariff. Other over-quota rates include blended dairy
    powder at 270%. Duties rise to as high as 314% for other products,
    according to data from the World Trade Organization. Canadian officials
    argue that all countries subsidize dairy, including the U.S. -- Canada essentially does so indirectly by closing its borders and capping
    production. https://cheesereporter.com/news/2025/08/01/us-dairy-groups-criticize-nonfat-milk-solids-policies-of-canada-others-at-usitc-hearing/
    Washington—The nonfat milk solids policies of Canada, the European
    Union, India and Turkey were criticized by several dairy organizations
    at a US International Trade Commission (USITC) hearing here Monday.
    “Out of the leading global suppliers to the world nonfat milk solids markets, Canada’s distortionary policies are currently the most impactful and harmful on those markets,” according to USDEC and NMPF. “Canadian government policies that drive unsustainable surpluses are coupled with extensive industry subsidization and a complex pricing structure that leads to artificially low-priced products pushed out into the international market.
    “The egregiously anticompetitive nature of the Canadian policies harm American suppliers by undercutting US prices globally while simultaneously denying market access into Canada, both of which are clear contraventions of its trade agreements and international trade rules,” NMPF and USDEC added.
    Meanwhile, the European Union (EU) has built a casein production system
    that was substantially subsidized by European taxpayers under the
    Common Agriculture Policy (CAP). US exporters are still dealing with
    the resulting consequences of the EU’s anticompetitive policies that
    have propped up its domestic casein manufacturers, USDEC and NMPF noted.

    Meanwhile the US government subsidizes it's agriculture sector
    allowing it to dump it's products in other countries.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2025/11/23/canada-tariffs-trump-00663710
    Trump quietly holds off on Canada tariff increase
    11/23/2025 04:00 PM EST
    President Donald Trump has yet to follow through on his threat to impose an additional 10 percent tariff on Canadian imports, four weeks after he halted “all trade negotiations” over an anti-tariff ad the province of Ontario ran during the Major League Baseball World Series.
    “Because of their serious misrepresentation of the facts, and hostile act, I am increasing the Tariff on Canada by 10% over and above what they are paying now,” Trump wrote on Truth Social on Oct. 25, after announcing two days earlier that he was terminating trade talks over the the ”egregious” ad.
    Trump’s announcement had Canadian exporters preparing for a worst-case scenario: a sweeping levy layered on top of existing double-digit duties, which would have been particularly painful for industries like autos, where components cross the border multiple times before reaching their final form.
    But to date, the Trump administration hasn’t sent any official
    documentation ordering U.S. Customs and Border Protection to enforce
    the new, higher duty, and U.S. importers have not received any new
    regulatory guidance.
    The White House did not say whether it still plans to impose the tariff when asked for comment. But a separate U.S. official suggested the Trump administration had opted to hold off on additional duties — which would have sent tariffs on Canadian goods to 45 percent — and instead continue to dangle the threat as the two sides gear up for future talks.
    “The Canadians know what’s on the table,” said the official, granted anonymity to discuss private conversations.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 10:37:32 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 17:38:56 -0500
    Ed P <esp@snet.n> wrote:
    On 12/2/2025 4:50 PM, lomonosov wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 16:38:15 -0500
    Ed P <esp@snet.n> wrote:

    On 12/2/2025 4:12 PM, lomonosov wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 12:42:01 -0700
    Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    President Spray-tan
    has made it too difficult to deliver to the USA at the moment.

    Has he really?

    At first blush you might think so:

    "Wood and furniture products: There are new tariffs on certain
    wood and furniture products. Softwood lumber: 10% duty
    Upholstered wooden products: 25% duty
    Kitchen cabinets and vanities: 25% duty, with plans to increase to
    50% in 2026"

    I don't see wood bowls listed.

    They're 'art' objects imoh.

    AI Overview
    "Shipping artwork from a Canadian small business to the USA
    involves potential tariffs, as the previous duty-free de minimis
    exemption for shipments under $800 USD has been eliminated.
    However, //original artworks are generally duty-free, and
    Canadian-made items may be exempt from new tariffs// if they meet
    the conditions of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement
    (USMCA). "

    I think you just don't want to do the legwork on this, so much
    easier to blame Trump than Carney the protectionist barker, isn't
    it?

    You make it sound simple, but it is not.

    Are you Canajun?

    Yes, the blame goes to the guy that started the tariffs.

    That would be to each trade protectionist foreign nation that hit us
    with import duties first, and for many decades too.


    Small businesses are getting hurt, as well as buyers.

    Anecdotal.


    I can no longer buy from a favorite source.

    Anecdotal.


    I've been buying from Tea Traded for about 12 years. Not they cannot
    easily ship to the US. Yes, that is my true anecdote. It worked
    until Trump effed up.
    Boo fucking hoo.
    Cry me a river of narcissistic tears.
    Oh, I can't find your vendor:
    teatraded.com’s DNS address could not be found.
    However, your whine is dismissed:
    https://tealet.com/
    Welcome to Tealet Wholesale!
    The Tealet grower network is composed of family farms and independent cooperatives in 8 different countries and 15 different growing regions, all with a dedication to their craft and their communities. Through our online platform you can trace their teas from field to cup. From videos from the tea gardens, to detailed profiles of each farm, we have designed our platform to make it simple for you to source the best teas from independent growers around the world.
    And just as we've cultivated close relationships with tea growers, we
    work closely our retail partners to advance tea programs to new levels
    of quality and engagement. We are committed to being your partner in a
    more conscious tea community!
    Grower List
    Second Alarm Farm
    View Profile
    Jim Chestnut and Edna Arakawa grow tea along with coffee, orchids, and macademia nuts at Second Alarm Farm. Their tea is completely handcrafted in small batches.
    Region: Pahoa, The Big Island, Hawaii
    Satemwa Tea Estate
    View Profile
    Satemwa Tea Estate is a small, third generation, family owned farm in Malawi. Established in 1923, Satemwa has been making artisanal tea that is unique and ensures a better standard of living for the community.
    Region: Thyolo, Malawi, Africa
    The Li Family
    View Profile
    Farmer Li and his family craft puerh from old tea trees that have been growing undisturbed on Nannuo Mountain for generations.
    Region: Nannuo Mountain, Yunnan, China
    The Huang Family
    View Profile
    Feng-Yao, Huang and his family have a tea and pear tree farm located over 1800 meters in QiLai Mountain.
    Region: Qilai, Hualien, Taiwan
    Kanoka Tea Estate
    View Profile
    Small scale tea farm in middle Assam with organic practices since the very beginning rather than converting them from chemical cultivation at a later stage.
    Region: Sonitpur, Assam, India
    Wuyishan Rock Tea Village
    View Profile
    Located in the famous tea-producing Wuyi Mountains region, the Chen Family works together to produce top-quality teas from their mineral-rich groves of tea trees.
    Region: Wuyi, Fujian, China
    Hariyali Cooperative
    View Profile
    Led by Purna Mukhiya, Hariyali Cooperative is an independent grower seeking to make a name for Nepal on the international tea stage.
    Region: Jasbirey, Ilam, Nepal
    Chabbesey
    View Profile
    Located in Nepal on the border of Darjeeling, the village of Chabbesey is a modest place of nature and diversity, ideal for high-quality tea.
    Region: Chabbesey, Nepal
    Tecchan
    View Profile
    Tecchan is a 5th geneneration tea-maker in Wazuka Village. He works alongside his father to continue the family legacy.
    Region: Wazuka Village, Kyoto, Japan
    Manla Village
    View Profile
    Mr. Nianlei Liu is a farmer and puerh tea-maker in Manla Village - his first tea garden was started by his grandfather over 100 years ago.
    Region: Mt. Ailao, Yunnan, China
    Teenjure Cooperative
    View Profile
    One of Nepal's first tea cooperatives, Teenjure Cooperative is helping to pioneer new systems to help Nepal grow into a leader in specialty tea.
    Region: Phakphok, Nepal
    The Kurihara Family
    View Profile
    The Kurihara Family, from the small village of Yabe in Yame, Japan, has won championships for their superior tea craftsmanship.
    Region: Yabe Village, Yame, Japan
    Kuanhong Village
    View Profile
    Mr. Fan Hongwei is a farmer and puerh tea-maker in Kuanhong Village. He wants to share Mt. Kunlu tea with tea lovers outside China.
    Region: Mt. Kunlu, Yunnan China
    Yanki Tea
    View Profile
    The Darjeeling Small Growers Society is committed to helping farmers improve their lives, socially and economically. They collaborate for the sake of quality tea.
    Region: Darjeeling, India
    Pathivara Tea Estate
    View Profile
    Pathivara is located in a very remote area of Eastern Nepal. The pristine environment and 2000m elevation results in excellent tea.
    Region: Panchthar, Nepal
    Neelamalai Organics
    View Profile
    Neelamalai Organics is a family farm located at 2,000m elevation in the Nilgiri Mountains, using Indian agricultural techniques for sustainable farming.
    Region: Nilgiris, India
    JusTea
    View Profile
    [Pending] JusTea is creating a partnership between Kenyan tea farmers and tea drinkers around the world through hand-crafted tea.
    Region: Kisumu, Kenya
    Amba Estate
    View Profile
    Led by Beverly Wainwright, Amba Estate creates artisanal, hand-made teas at an unprecedented level of quality and ethics for Sri Lankan tea.
    Region: Ambadandegama, Sri Lanka
    https://verdanttea.com/
    VERDANT TEA
    is about TEA FARMERS
    We are all about representation, bringing teas never before seen outside China to the world with a unique direct trade model based on decades of personal relationships.
    We are dedicated to the story of the growers, our partners, the peolpe behind the tea.
    Taste their work for yourself and see the difference.
    FREE SHIPPING
    fast, free shipping
    all US Orders $45+
    FREE TEA SAMPLE
    hand picked for you
    with each order
    DIRECT SOURCED
    sourced from the farm
    shipped from the USA
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 10:40:58 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Wed, 03 Dec 2025 09:44:38 +1100
    Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 14:28:16 -0700, lomonosov <bubbles@in.valid> wrote:

    On Wed, 03 Dec 2025 08:23:58 +1100
    Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 14:12:01 -0700, lomonosov <bubbles@in.valid>
    wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 12:42:01 -0700
    Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    President Spray-tan
    has made it too difficult to deliver to the USA at the moment.


    Has he really?

    At first blush you might think so:

    "Wood and furniture products: There are new tariffs on certain
    wood and furniture products. Softwood lumber: 10% duty
    Upholstered wooden products: 25% duty
    Kitchen cabinets and vanities: 25% duty, with plans to increase to
    50% in 2026"

    I don't see wood bowls listed.

    They're 'art' objects imoh.

    AI Overview
    "Shipping artwork from a Canadian small business to the USA
    involves potential tariffs, as the previous duty-free de minimis
    exemption for shipments under $800 USD has been eliminated.
    However, //original artworks are generally duty-free, and
    Canadian-made items may be exempt from new tariffs// if they meet
    the conditions of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement
    (USMCA). "

    I think you just don't want to do the legwork on this, so much
    easier to blame Trump than Carney the protectionist barker, isn't
    it?

    Trump made a huge mess with his tariffs.

    Not for us he didn't.

    You're paying the tariffs. It's basically tax.

    Nope.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/NFG5Vup3f_o

    President Trump says Americans will be getting tariff rebates

    https://www.axios.com/2025/11/17/2000-tariff-dividend-trump-check-2026


    The man is too dumb to poop
    and so are the people who vote for him.

    NATO freleoaders also got the tab - FINALLY!

    That's one thing I agree with. Also because of Putin's behaviour.

    It is also one tiny thing you can whinge at the USA about for our years
    of debt nation enablement, the rest of your gripes with us here are
    simple trolls.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 10:43:45 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Wed, 03 Dec 2025 09:46:32 +1100
    Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 14:34:56 -0700, lomonosov <bubbles@in.valid> wrote:

    On Wed, 03 Dec 2025 08:24:53 +1100
    Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    The question is whether something's a gift or a commercially sold
    item.

    Did you read the USMCA?

    Are there any exceptions to USMCA rules?
    To qualify for USMCA tariff exemptions, products must meet detailed
    rules of origin. The two main requirements are: Regional Value
    Content (RVC): A minimum percentage of the product's value must
    originate from USMCA countries. For example, vehicles must contain
    at least 75% regional content to qualify.Jun 12, 2025

    Do tariffs apply to gifts?
    AI Overview
    Sending to USA? No problem. Gifts under $100 are tariff free ...
    Yes, tariffs can apply to gifts, but they are often exempt up to a
    certain value, provided certain conditions are met. In the United
    States, gifts valued at $100 or less are typically exempt from duties
    and taxes, as long as they are sent from one individual to another
    and the recipient doesn't receive more than that amount in a single
    day. If a gift exceeds this value or is sent commercially, tariffs
    will likely apply.

    So gifts are exempt, as I said.


    So a private Bitcoin or XRP payment and an art bowl sent from
    Canajia and identified as a "gift" slide past any tariff bogeyman,
    now don't they?




    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 10:45:03 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Wed, 03 Dec 2025 09:54:26 +1100
    Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On Wed, 03 Dec 2025 09:44:38 +1100, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 14:28:16 -0700, lomonosov <bubbles@in.valid>
    wrote:

    On Wed, 03 Dec 2025 08:23:58 +1100
    Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 14:12:01 -0700, lomonosov <bubbles@in.valid>
    wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 12:42:01 -0700
    Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    President Spray-tan
    has made it too difficult to deliver to the USA at the moment.


    Has he really?

    At first blush you might think so:

    "Wood and furniture products: There are new tariffs on certain
    wood and furniture products. Softwood lumber: 10% duty
    Upholstered wooden products: 25% duty
    Kitchen cabinets and vanities: 25% duty, with plans to increase
    to 50% in 2026"

    I don't see wood bowls listed.

    They're 'art' objects imoh.

    AI Overview
    "Shipping artwork from a Canadian small business to the USA
    involves potential tariffs, as the previous duty-free de minimis
    exemption for shipments under $800 USD has been eliminated.
    However, //original artworks are generally duty-free, and
    Canadian-made items may be exempt from new tariffs// if they
    meet the conditions of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement
    (USMCA). "

    I think you just don't want to do the legwork on this, so much
    easier to blame Trump than Carney the protectionist barker, isn't
    it?

    Trump made a huge mess with his tariffs.

    Not for us he didn't.

    You're paying the tariffs. It's basically tax.

    The man is too dumb to poop
    and so are the people who vote for him.

    NATO freleoaders also got the tab - FINALLY!

    That's one thing I agree with. Also because of Putin's behaviour.

    Countries that are not making the currently agreed 2% of GDP payment
    to NATO:
    Spain, Canada, Belgium, Luxembourg, Slovenia, Italy, Portugal,
    Croatia.


    Wrong - again!

    Results under Trump's first term: During and after Trump's first presidency, non-U.S. NATO members significantly increased their defense budgets. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg credited Trump's focus with bringing a "new sense of urgency" and a substantial rise in spending. By 2024, a record number of countries (23 out of 32) were expected to meet or exceed the 2% target, up from only three in 2014.
    The New 5% Commitment
    At a summit in The Hague in June 2025, NATO leaders formally agreed to a new, more ambitious spending goal of 5% of GDP on defense and security by 2035. This new figure is broken down into:
    3.5% for core military needs (troops, weapons, etc.), an increase from the previous 2% target.
    1.5% for "militarily adjacent" projects such as improving infrastructure (roads, bridges, ports), cybersecurity, and civic resilience.
    This new commitment was widely seen as a major political victory for
    Trump, who had been pushing for the higher number. Spain was the only
    nation to initially raise reservations about the 5% target, though it
    later signed the joint statement.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 10:47:24 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 18:29:42 -0500
    jmquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net> wrote:
    On 12/2/2025 2:42 PM, Graham wrote:
    On 2025-12-01 7:48 p.m., Ed P wrote:
    On 12/1/2025 8:47 PM, Graham wrote:
    On 2025-12-01 6:30 p.m., ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net wrote:

    I've found you a new wood working project.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/5VZOCNQX91k
    ~
    Here are some spherical ring boxes I recently finished:
    https://postimg.cc/kRJTCZdP


    Very nice!

    BTW, I use the tea scoop you made every day.  Perfect size for a
    mug of tea.
    Thanks, Ed!! I'm really glad that you are using the scoop. I
    delivered some tea caddies to the Tea Trader the other day and
    President Spray-tan has made it too difficult to deliver to the USA
    at the moment. Not only that but Canada Post informed me that if I
    were to send a xmas present to someone in the USA, I would have to
    pay the duty up front! Of course, that doesn't affect commercial
    operations but apparently the paperwork is a nightmare.

    That's so sad. Those tariffs are ridiculous.

    Jill
    That's so sense of you, and him.
    Those milk and steel tariffs Canajia imposes on America don't enter your
    flat and empty head, now do they? https://www.pm.gc.ca/en/news/news-releases/2025/11/26/prime-minister-carney-announces-new-measures-protect-and-transform
    November 26, 2025
    Ottawa, Ontario
    The world is changing rapidly. The United States, the world’s largest economy, is fundamentally reshaping all its trade relationships, causing major disruption and upheaval for Canadians. It is time to transform our economy from one that is reliant on a single trade partner to one that is stronger, more self-sufficient, and resilient to global shocks. That means working with urgency and determination to transform our strategic industries so they can adapt, compete, and win in this new global environment.
    Canada’s new government has moved quickly to protect and strengthen the sectors most affected by U.S. tariffs – introducing new measures to help workers gain new skills, support businesses as they modernise and diversify, and boost domestic demand for Canadian goods. As we build the economy of the future, we’re ensuring workers and industries are ready to seize its opportunities.
    Building on previously announced measures to help transform the Canadian steel and softwood lumber industries, the following new initiatives were announced today.
    Canada’s new government will:
    Further limit foreign steel imports to ensure that Canadian steel producers have better access to the domestic market
    Canada will tighten the tariff rate quota levels for steel products from non-free trade agreement (FTA) partners from 50% to 20% of 2024 levels.
    For non-CUSMA partners with which we have an FTA, Canada will reduce tariff rate quota levels for steel products from 100% to 75% of 2024 levels.
    Canada will impose a global 25% tariff on targeted imported steel-derivative products such as wind towers, prefabricated buildings, fasteners, and wires.
    Canada will also toughen our border measures to combat foreign steel dumping and verify compliance with applicable surtaxes. To do so, we will equip the Canada Border Services Agency with a dedicated steel compliance team, enhanced detection of false declarations, and an expanded online reporting tool.
    To move away from relying on imported steel and to give Canadian companies time to adjust their supply chains to use Canadian steel, the temporary remission of Canadian tariffs on imports will end on January 31, 2026, for steel used in Canada for manufacturing, food and beverage packaging, and agricultural production.
    These measures will boost the competitiveness of Canadian steel producers by protecting them against trade diversion. They will also unlock over $1 billion in new domestic demand for Canadian steel.

    Make it easier to build with Canadian steel and Canadian lumber
    To make it more affordable to transport Canadian steel and lumber across the country, Canada will work with railway companies to cut freight rates for transporting Canadian steel and lumber interprovincially by 50%, beginning in Spring 2026.
    To maximise the use of Canadian softwood lumber in housing, Build Canada Homes will prioritise shovel-ready, multi-year projects that can begin within 12 months and that use Canadian wood products.
    With a funding allocation of roughly $700 million next year, Build Canada Homes – our new federal homebuilding agency – alone will create $70 to $140 million of new demand for Canadian wood products – and attract private and provincial capital to multiply its impact.
    Finally, Canada’s new government will implement our Buy Canadian Policy later this year, which requires that all contracts worth over $25 million prioritise Canadian materials – including steel and lumber. This will also apply across federal grants and contributions programs.

    Increase protections for Canadian steel and lumber workers and businesses so they can adapt and thrive in this new global landscape
    Canada will earmark more than $100 million over two years, starting in 2025-2026, in program costs to provide support to eligible employers in all sectors with an active Work-Sharing agreement and who commit to supporting training for employees working reduced hours. This measure will increase the income replacement for eligible workers, helping up to 26,000 Canadian workers in various sectors, including steel and lumber.
    To ensure companies have the financing and credit support they need to maintain and restructure their operations during this period of transformation, Canada will provide an additional $500 million to the Business Development Bank of Canada (BDC) Softwood Lumber Guarantee Program.
    To support softwood lumber firms facing liquidity pressures, Canada will earmark $500 million in funding under the Large Enterprise Tariff Loan facility.
    To make it easier for the forestry sector to access federal support, we will establish a single window to applications – a one-stop shop to help companies navigate our suite of support programs.
    To examine and report on how the forest industry can maintain its competitiveness over the long-term, Canada will launch a Canadian Forest Sector Transformation Task Force. This Task Force will seek input and recommendations from provinces, territories, and industry on managing the sector’s transformation.
    At this critical moment in Canada’s history, we are moving from reliance to resilience. Using Canadian steel and Canadian lumber, we will build Canada strong.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 10:54:15 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 19:19:04 -0600
    Bryan Simmons <bryangsimmons@gmail.com> wrote:
    Their "Spray-tan" PIECE OF SHIT is sexual predator
    https://nypost.com/2022/07/08/portrait-of-the-bidens-a-family-as-dysfunctional-as-the-kennedys-and-protected-by-the-press/
    Joe Biden, as his former daughter-in-law recounts in her new memoir, comes on strong.
    That’s no surprise to anyone who has read the allegations of sexual inappropriateness against President Biden, or has seen the multiple videos and photos of creepy Uncle Joe with women and young girls: sniffing their hair, massaging their shoulders, pressing his forehead against theirs, grabbing them by the arm or kissing them on the lips, pulling them in close for a full-contact hug.
    Betsy DeVos, in her new memoir, is the latest to claim unwanted forehead-to-forehead contact. She was in a wheelchair at the time, recovering from a bike accident, with nowhere to run. “It was gross, and it was also a feeble attempt to intimidate me,” she writes.
    But no left-leaning outlet, otherwise hyper-attuned to such violations, seems to care.
    Nor has much attention been paid to that first meeting between Hunter Biden’s ex-wife Kathleen Buhle and Joe. As she writes in her newly-published book, “If We Break,” Joe, then a stranger to her, “put his hands on my cheeks and looked me in the eyes, his nose almost touching my own. ‘Honey,’ he said, ‘my boy tells me he loves you, so that means I love you, too. Understand? I love you.’ ”
    Joe’s instant intimacy was, Buhle says, a lot. “I honestly didn’t know what to do with it,” she writes.
    Who would?
    If We Break: A Memoir of Marriage, Addiction, and Healing by Kathleen Buhle 10
    Kathleen Buhle, Hunter Biden’s ex-wife, recently wrote tell-all on her life with the Bidens.
    Crown Publishing Group
    That encounter was a preview for life with the Bidens, a family whose public image — that of a close-knit, well-adjusted family brought even closer by tragedy — is at stark odds with reality.
    Not since the Kennedys has the mainstream media ignored such familial dysfunction, lack of sexual boundaries, hardcore substance abuse issues, the hiring of sex workers, the leveraging of presidential access for money and trails of corruption, greed and thirst for power that supersede all.
    To get this out of the way: Donald Trump, of course, has said pretty disturbing stuff — “if Ivanka weren’t my daughter, perhaps I’d be dating her” is but one example — and has been accused of sexual harassment and rape. The difference is that the mainstream media has treated every single one of these utterances and accusations with utmost seriousness.
    President Biden’s adult children share a strange habit of leaving their most intimate communications, thoughts and confessions where anybody can find them. Hunter hasn’t denied the laptop is his; Ashley hasn’t denied the diary is hers.
    So why isn’t the media treating their contents as newsworthy?
    Hunter and Ashley take issue not just with their father but with the media’s fantasy step-mommy, the saintly Dr. Jill Biden. Each writes of feeling like political pawns or liabilities, of letting their father down, of anger towards their parents’ ambition. Neglect is a common thread, substance abuse a problem Ashley and Hunter share.
    How much anger might each adult child harbor over their upbringing?
    Biden is seen with his family leaving on a train for Washington in 1987.
    10
    Biden is seen with his family leaving on a train for Washington in 1987. Bettmann Archive
    It says something when, in the midst of your hotly fought presidential run against a super-controversial opponent — a campaign in which you run as steady, experienced, moderate, sane, and above all else, compassionate — your crack-addled son decides to give a lengthy profile to The New Yorker. Hunter’s openness extended to his lobbying days while dad was in office, of this privileged political scion’s time living with a homeless woman named Bicycles (“mainly . . . we just planted ourselves on the couch and smoked a ton of crack”), and of his affair with his dead brother’s wife.
    “All we got was s–t from everybody, all the time,” Hunter told the New Yorker. “It was really hard.”
    Spoken like a true addict with an ax to grind and maybe, just maybe, a vendetta against his father. Why else open up to one of the left’s most unimpeachable outlets? Why else open the door to a former Obama aide telling the publication what a liability Hunter was?
    “On the loose,” the Obama aide said, “undermining his father’s message.”
    Really: It’s enough to make you think that Hunter and Ashley Biden are trying to tell us something.
    If only liberal news outlets got the hint. No wonder 63% of Americans, per Gallup, don’t trust the media.
    Joe Biden and his family gather at Capitol Hill on June 9, 1987.
    10
    Joe Biden and his family on Capitol Hill on June 9, 1987.
    Lana Harris/AP
    Even Bill Maher took umbrage earlier this year, excoriating left-leaning outlets for ignoring the Hunter Biden laptop story as the 2020 election neared. (By the way, Hunter has lost or abandoned three computers, including one reportedly recovered from celebrity therapist Keith Ablow’s office.)
    “It looks like the left-wing media has buried the story because it wasn’t part of their narrative,” Maher said on his weekly HBO show. “Hunter Biden . . . you’ve made a living being a ne’er-do-well who was taking money just because you were the vice president’s son, and you had influence. He has $8 million dollars from Chinese energy companies to” — air quotes here — “’sit on the board’ and consult. Yeah, that was his passion in life — energy exploration. Hooker exploration was his passion.”
    Truer words.
    The Ashley Biden diary is the most recent example of a blanket media blackout, a July 2019 excerpt going viral two weeks ago. Read this and defend it as non-newsworthy:
    “Was I molested,” the author writes. “I think so — I can’t remember specifics but I do remember trauma. Hyper-sexualized @ a young age . . . I remember being somewhat sexualized with Caroline; I remember having sex with friends @ a young age; showers w/my dad (probably not appropriate).”
    She also wrote that she was in treatment “for sexual trauma.”
    Joe Biden is sworn in as Vice President by Associate Justice John Paul Stevens with his family by his side.
    10
    Joe Biden is sworn in as Vice President by Associate Justice John Paul Stevens with his family by his side.
    Scott J. Ferrell/Congressional Quarterly/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images Imagine this entry written by Ivanka Trump. Imagine the media hailstorm, the feminist outrage, the minute-by-minute calls for a federal investigation on 24-hour cable news — calls quickly ratcheting up to impeachment or invoking the 25th Amendment — the late night talk shows, the obvious headline: Is the sitting president of the United States a child abuser?
    Note that a woman who identified herself in the diary as Ashley Blazer Biden wrote this as an adult, as part of her therapy sessions, to work out her sex addiction.
    In trying to identify its root causes, the author continues:
    “ — my mother not emotionally available —
    “ — my father was — message — I could get love from men
    “ — ‘I’m not your mother’”
    “ — Blanket being taken away
    “ — Not letting myself go to the bathroom
    “ — Being wiped until too late in the game — ”
    “I’ve had one of my hardest days,” the author wrote. “My sex drive is out of f–ing control. Like literally, I am in heat. I know it’s not the healthiest way to deal with things but @ least it’s better than drugs.”
    The Biden family watches fireworks from the Truman Balcony of the White House on July 4.
    10
    The Biden family watches fireworks from the Truman Balcony of the White House on July 4.
    Chris Kleponis – Pool via CNP/MEGA
    If these aren’t Ashley Biden’s entries, why not publicly say so?
    One day after these entries circulated online, 41-year-old Ashley — who normally keeps an extremely low profile — was photographed taking a windswept, Kennedy-esque walk on the beach with her mother Jill.
    See Also
    First Lady Jill Biden, her daughter, Ashley (pictured left with Joe Biden), and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (top right) are among 25 Americans who have been added to Vladimir Putin's (bottom right) so-called "stop list" in response to U.S. sanctions against Russia
    Russia slaps sanctions on first lady Jill Biden, daughter Ashley
    Two days after that, Ashley was back on the beach, in front of the press, this time with her father.
    When Joe began chatting with reporters, Ashley interrupted. “Nope,” she said. “No more questions.”
    But the diary does nothing but raise questions. The Joe Biden who branded himself — with a complicit media — as America’s grandpa, our counselor-in-grief and empathizer extraordinaire, is revealed by Ashley and Hunter as, at times, absent, manipulative, and more concerned with his political career than his children.
    As Joe faced yet another presidential debate in July 2019, the diary’s author wrote of an upsetting conversation with her father.
    “My dad cried on the phone saying he has the debate in a week and, ‘Now has to worry about me.’ . . . Maybe he knows what he is doing and it’s worked but my feelings of guilt are often overwhelming.”
    Joe Biden holds his daughter Ashley while taking a mock oath of office in January 1985.
    10
    Joe Biden holds his daughter Ashley while taking a mock oath of office in January 1985.
    Lana Harris/ASSOCIATED PRESS
    Hunter Biden expressed a similar sentiment after Joe announced he would not run for president in the 2016 election.
    “Well having made clear to the world that the only reason for not [running] is your family problems im [sic] glad to be the f—ing bullseye you painted on my back,” he wrote.
    There was very good reason for Joe not to run: He had just lost his adored son Beau — clearly his favorite child — to brain cancer.
    Also: Hunter, a married father of three, had begun an affair with Beau’s widow Hallie.
    When Page Six broke the story, Joe Biden issued a strange statement.
    See Also
    Hunter Biden
    editorial
    Compliant media can’t protect Hunter Biden forever
    “We are all lucky that Hunter and Hallie found each other” — as if they collided randomly, like atoms — “as they were putting their lives together after such sadness. They have mine and Jill’s complete support and we are happy for them.”
    No mention was made of Hunter’s three traumatized daughters, or Hunter’s long-suffering, blindsided wife, or of Hallie and Beau’s children, their uncle now playing stepfather — that is, when he wasn’t out blowing money he didn’t have on drugs, booze, strippers and sex workers.
    “YOU NEED TO GET TESTED FOR HIV HALLIE.”
    Hunter wrote this email to his brother’s widow in July 2018. He was simultaneously involved with Hallie’s married sister Elizabeth — not that you’ve read much about that scandal either.
    Hunter to Elizabeth, via text: “We should shower together by [FaceTime] every morning or night. I’ll teach you how to masturbate.”
    Hunter Biden in bathtub
    10
    A photo revealed from a laptop Hunter Biden abandoned at a Delaware shop. Hunter, Hallie and Elizabeth lived together at Beau’s old house. “They were obviously up 24/7 just partying,” one source told the Daily Mail. “They would sit out on the patio like crackheads almost.”
    Again: Imagine if this was a Republican president’s family. Imagine the cries of hypocrisy, of poor personal character and amorality, of illegal activity run amok — family values, think of the children! It’s all we’d hear, morning to night.
    A text from Hunter to Hallie, Nov. 2017: “By the way I’m going to have 5 strippers naked and admiring my d—k back to my hotel tonight and I’m going to smoke crack and drink enough to kill and [sic] elephant and put your kids” — Beau’s kids — “robbed over the phone and wake them up and assure them that your [sic] not as bad a person as you seem.”
    Not quite the storybook romance Biden Inc. was selling.
    After Hallie and Hunter broke up, Hunter wrote an email expressing confusion. Even though all kinds of familial and sexual boundaries had been crossed, he asked, why couldn’t they stay friends?
    Hunter Biden
    10
    Hunter Biden has a history of battling drug addiction.
    “I thought we agreed that we would never part ways,” he wrote Hallie, “and certainly that we would never forbid access to my family . . . Please do not continue to make [redacted] believe that I am somehow a danger to her if she is alone with me no matter what state I am in.”
    Amidst juggling the sisters, Hunter impregnated a stripper named Lunden Alexis Roberts, a woman he initially denied ever having sex with — even though she was on Hunter’s company’s payroll while pregnant.
    None of the Bidens have ever acknowledged the daughter Hunter fathered with Roberts. She’s only three.
    Then again, the Bidens have a pattern of overlooking Hunter’s bad behavior. This is a guy who had his father pull strings so he could join the Navy — despite being too old and having a history of drug use — only to test positive for cocaine before he could even report for duty. But hey, no big deal.
    It’s not like the media picked up on it.
    Besides, as Hunter told his then-wife Kathleen, he had absolutely no idea how cocaine got in his system. None!
    See Also
    hunter biden's ex wife memoir
    Memoir by Hunter Biden’s ex-wife Kathleen Buhle details how his cheating, drug abuse destroyed their marriage
    Kathleen wanted to believe him, she writes. Just as she wanted to believe all the dubious jobs Hunter had weren’t due to who his father was, or that she and Hunter were able to secure six-figure mortgages with zero in savings due to who his father was, or that she was actually a Biden, even when asked to step out of a family portrait meant for “Biden blood only.”
    Or when The New Yorker reported that, in the wake of the Hunter-Hallie affair, Kathleen “felt ostracized by the Biden family.”
    Biden lore, via People magazine and other sympathetic outlets, usually casts Joe as the most family-oriented politician of modern times.
    Again: In what universe? After his small boys survived a car crash that killed their mother and infant sister, Joe insisted on going to Capitol Hill, holding a public swearing-in ceremony in his children’s hospital room — 3-year-old Beau in traction with multiple broken bones, 2-year-old Hunter recovering from a severe head injury.
    Hunter Biden
    10
    Hunter Biden was seen in attendance of the award ceremony of the Presidential Medals of Freedom.
    Gripas Yuri/Abaca/Sipa USA
    No wonder Hunter might feel like a political prop.
    To be the sole surviving parent of two very small, very injured, traumatized, motherless toddlers and sally forth to life as a career politician — to not put that goal aside for a few years at least — well, if that isn’t craven, what is?
    Instead we got “Amtrak Joe,” the media’s appellation for just another single dad, commuting daily from D.C. to Delaware, so devoted to his boys that he wouldn’t rent an apartment near the Hill as so many of his colleagues did and do.
    But au contraire, says Joe’s troublesome son. As Hunter wrote in his memoir, Joe’s sister Val and his brother Jim moved into the Biden home and raised the boys. Not that they ever get the credit.
    Hunter and Joe Biden hold grandson Beau Biden on July 4.
    10
    Hunter and Joe Biden hold grandson Beau Biden on July 4.
    Dominick Sokotoff/ZUMAPRESS.com
    Anyway, soon enough Joe met Jill on a blind date. Or so they say.
    Ready for more alternative facts? Here’s Jill’s first husband, Bill Stevenson, on that little origin story.
    “I considered Joe a friend,” Stephenson told the Daily Mail. He and Jill worked on Biden’s first Senate run, Stephenson said, and within two years, Jill and Joe were having an affair.
    “Jill and I sat in the Biden’s kitchen,” he said. “I gave $10,900 to his first campaign — in cash.”
    Never Miss a Story
    Sign up to get the best stories straight to your inbox.
    Enter your email address
    By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
    The most genuine and heartbreaking detail in Hunter’s memoir: “our mommy” was what he and Beau called their birth mother into adulthood. He claimed that even so, he and Beau considered Jill their second mom. The press loves this story, Jill swooping in seamlessly, healing all their trauma and abandonment with effortless maternal love.
    “You’re avoiding being the chosen one,” Hunter’s therapist wrote to him of his turbulent love life, “because you were not the chosen one, by your step-mother.”
    Perhaps Joe and Jill Biden share more in common with the Reagans than the Kennedys. After all, Ron and Nancy were famously devoted only to each other, their own children outspoken about feeling left out and neglected as their parents powered through the political ranks.
    Here’s another question the media conspicuously avoids: If anyone was privy to Joe’s obviously deteriorating mental faculties, it had to be Jill. How could she encourage her husband to run, let alone urge Americans to elect him?
    221
    What do you think? Post a comment.
    Just how badly did these two need to be in the White House?
    To look at the collateral damage in their wake — namely, Ashley and
    Hunter — is to approach an answer.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 10:57:10 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Wed, 03 Dec 2025 13:03:47 +1100
    Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    A few years ago, the Dutch Evangelical Channel wanted to know why
    their American brethren and sisters voted for Trump. They asked them.
    It turned out that one of their main reasons to vote for Trump is that
    (he says) he's against abortion. I specifically remember one quote
    from the Americans: "We know Trump's not perfect, but if God chose him
    to do His work, who are we to say No?"

    How incredibly insightful and morally sound of them!

    What happened to YOU?

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bruce@Bruce@invalid.invalid to rec.food.cooking on Thu Dec 4 04:59:55 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 10:43:45 -0700, lomonosov <bubbles@in.valid> wrote:

    On Wed, 03 Dec 2025 09:46:32 +1100
    Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 14:34:56 -0700, lomonosov <bubbles@in.valid> wrote:

    On Wed, 03 Dec 2025 08:24:53 +1100
    Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    The question is whether something's a gift or a commercially sold
    item.

    Did you read the USMCA?

    Are there any exceptions to USMCA rules?
    To qualify for USMCA tariff exemptions, products must meet detailed
    rules of origin. The two main requirements are: Regional Value
    Content (RVC): A minimum percentage of the product's value must
    originate from USMCA countries. For example, vehicles must contain
    at least 75% regional content to qualify.Jun 12, 2025

    Do tariffs apply to gifts?
    AI Overview
    Sending to USA? No problem. Gifts under $100 are tariff free ...
    Yes, tariffs can apply to gifts, but they are often exempt up to a
    certain value, provided certain conditions are met. In the United
    States, gifts valued at $100 or less are typically exempt from duties
    and taxes, as long as they are sent from one individual to another
    and the recipient doesn't receive more than that amount in a single
    day. If a gift exceeds this value or is sent commercially, tariffs
    will likely apply.

    So gifts are exempt, as I said.


    So a private Bitcoin or XRP payment and an art bowl sent from
    Canajia and identified as a "gift" slide past any tariff bogeyman,
    now don't they?

    Don't drink so much.
    --
    Bruce <https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/gettyimages-681946574-20250717233334800.jpg>
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bruce@Bruce@invalid.invalid to rec.food.cooking on Thu Dec 4 05:04:02 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 10:45:03 -0700, lomonosov <bubbles@in.valid> wrote:

    On Wed, 03 Dec 2025 09:54:26 +1100
    Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    Countries that are not making the currently agreed 2% of GDP payment
    to NATO:
    Spain, Canada, Belgium, Luxembourg, Slovenia, Italy, Portugal,
    Croatia.

    Wrong - again!

    Results under Trump's first term: During and after Trump's first presidency, >non-U.S. NATO members significantly increased their defense budgets.
    NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg credited Trump's focus with
    bringing a "new sense of urgency" and a substantial rise in spending.
    By 2024, a record number of countries (23 out of 32) were expected to
    meet or exceed the 2% target, up from only three in 2014.

    Right, and I listed 8 countries that don't meet that 2% target.

    The New 5% Commitment
    At a summit in The Hague in June 2025, NATO leaders formally agreed to a new, more ambitious spending goal of 5% of GDP on defense and security by 2035. This new figure is broken down into:
    3.5% for core military needs (troops, weapons, etc.), an increase from the previous 2% target.
    1.5% for "militarily adjacent" projects such as improving infrastructure (roads, bridges, ports), cybersecurity, and civic resilience.
    This new commitment was widely seen as a major political victory for
    Trump, who had been pushing for the higher number. Spain was the only
    nation to initially raise reservations about the 5% target, though it
    later signed the joint statement.

    Right, that's the new target they recently agreed on. What's your
    point? Why do you always quote text that says the same thing I just
    said? And with a misplaced air of knowing better?
    --
    Bruce <https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/gettyimages-681946574-20250717233334800.jpg>
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bruce@Bruce@invalid.invalid to rec.food.cooking on Thu Dec 4 05:08:38 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 10:47:24 -0700, lomonosov <bubbles@in.valid> wrote:

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 18:29:42 -0500
    jmquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net> wrote:

    On 12/2/2025 2:42 PM, Graham wrote:

    That's so sad. Those tariffs are ridiculous.

    Jill

    That's so sense of you, and him.

    Those milk and steel tariffs Canajia imposes on America don't enter your
    flat and empty head, now do they?

    Can't you just say what you have to say instead of quoting endless
    texts that nobody's going to read?
    --
    Bruce <https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/gettyimages-681946574-20250717233334800.jpg>
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 11:23:00 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 09:46:28 -0000 (UTC)
    Cindy Hamilton <chamilton5280@invalid.com> wrote:

    On 2025-12-03, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    A few years ago, the Dutch Evangelical Channel wanted to know why
    their American brethren and sisters voted for Trump. They asked
    them. It turned out that one of their main reasons to vote for
    Trump is that (he says) he's against abortion. I specifically
    remember one quote from the Americans: "We know Trump's not
    perfect, but if God chose him to do His work, who are we to say
    No?"

    Trump will say anything to anybody in order to get what he wants.
    Once he has what he wants, he discards them like a used tissue.


    So you're saying he's too Clintonian then?

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 11:24:11 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Wed, 03 Dec 2025 20:54:40 +1100
    Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 09:46:28 -0000 (UTC), Cindy Hamilton <chamilton5280@invalid.com> wrote:

    On 2025-12-03, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    A few years ago, the Dutch Evangelical Channel wanted to know why
    their American brethren and sisters voted for Trump. They asked
    them. It turned out that one of their main reasons to vote for
    Trump is that (he says) he's against abortion. I specifically
    remember one quote from the Americans: "We know Trump's not
    perfect, but if God chose him to do His work, who are we to say
    No?"

    Trump will say anything to anybody in order to get what he wants.
    Once he has what he wants, he discards them like a used tissue.

    Yes, and the used tissues don't realise it. Still DO NOT realise it.
    It's difficult to believe.


    Even more difficult to believe is the magnitude of your need to kvetch
    about him from a lost land down under.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Cindy Hamilton@chamilton5280@invalid.com to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 18:26:58 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 2025-12-03, Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:
    On 2025-12-03 4:46 a.m., Cindy Hamilton wrote:
    On 2025-12-03, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    A few years ago, the Dutch Evangelical Channel wanted to know why
    their American brethren and sisters voted for Trump. They asked them.
    It turned out that one of their main reasons to vote for Trump is that
    (he says) he's against abortion. I specifically remember one quote
    from the Americans: "We know Trump's not perfect, but if God chose him
    to do His work, who are we to say No?"

    Trump will say anything to anybody in order to get what he wants.
    Once he has what he wants, he discards them like a used tissue.



    We saw that on the news last night when they were being confronted about ordering a second strike on an alleged drug running boat. When the heat
    was turned up it they threw the naval commander under the bus. They
    need to be reminded that just following orders didn't work at the
    Nuremburg trials.

    They were reminded, by the six members of Congress whom Trump
    now wants executed for treason.
    --
    Cindy Hamilton
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 11:28:11 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 09:22:04 -0500
    Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:

    On 2025-12-03 4:46 a.m., Cindy Hamilton wrote:
    On 2025-12-03, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    A few years ago, the Dutch Evangelical Channel wanted to know why
    their American brethren and sisters voted for Trump. They asked
    them. It turned out that one of their main reasons to vote for
    Trump is that (he says) he's against abortion. I specifically
    remember one quote from the Americans: "We know Trump's not
    perfect, but if God chose him to do His work, who are we to say
    No?"

    Trump will say anything to anybody in order to get what he wants.
    Once he has what he wants, he discards them like a used tissue.



    We saw that on the news last night when they were being confronted
    about ordering a second strike on an alleged drug running boat. When
    the heat was turned up it they threw the naval commander under the
    bus. They need to be reminded that just following orders didn't work
    at the Nuremburg trials.


    You're always so quick to wrap yourself in Godwin's Law.

    What an utter assbag you are.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 11:33:57 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Thu, 04 Dec 2025 04:59:55 +1100
    Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 10:43:45 -0700, lomonosov <bubbles@in.valid> wrote:

    On Wed, 03 Dec 2025 09:46:32 +1100
    Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 14:34:56 -0700, lomonosov <bubbles@in.valid>
    wrote:
    On Wed, 03 Dec 2025 08:24:53 +1100
    Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    The question is whether something's a gift or a commercially
    sold item.

    Did you read the USMCA?

    Are there any exceptions to USMCA rules?
    To qualify for USMCA tariff exemptions, products must meet
    detailed rules of origin. The two main requirements are: Regional
    Value Content (RVC): A minimum percentage of the product's value
    must originate from USMCA countries. For example, vehicles must
    contain at least 75% regional content to qualify.Jun 12, 2025

    Do tariffs apply to gifts?
    AI Overview
    Sending to USA? No problem. Gifts under $100 are tariff free ...
    Yes, tariffs can apply to gifts, but they are often exempt up to a
    certain value, provided certain conditions are met. In the United
    States, gifts valued at $100 or less are typically exempt from
    duties and taxes, as long as they are sent from one individual to
    another and the recipient doesn't receive more than that amount
    in a single day. If a gift exceeds this value or is sent
    commercially, tariffs will likely apply.

    So gifts are exempt, as I said.


    So a private Bitcoin or XRP payment and an art bowl sent from
    Canajia and identified as a "gift" slide past any tariff bogeyman,
    now don't they?

    Don't drink so much.

    A red herring cocktail deflection more your flavour?

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 11:36:42 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Thu, 04 Dec 2025 05:04:02 +1100
    Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 10:45:03 -0700, lomonosov <bubbles@in.valid> wrote:

    On Wed, 03 Dec 2025 09:54:26 +1100
    Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    Countries that are not making the currently agreed 2% of GDP
    payment to NATO:
    Spain, Canada, Belgium, Luxembourg, Slovenia, Italy, Portugal,
    Croatia.

    Wrong - again!

    Results under Trump's first term: During and after Trump's first >presidency, non-U.S. NATO members significantly increased their
    defense budgets. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg credited
    Trump's focus with bringing a "new sense of urgency" and a
    substantial rise in spending. By 2024, a record number of countries
    (23 out of 32) were expected to meet or exceed the 2% target, up
    from only three in 2014.

    Right, and I listed 8 countries that don't meet that 2% target.

    I win again.

    Spain takes the circle.


    The New 5% Commitment
    At a summit in The Hague in June 2025, NATO leaders formally agreed
    to a new, more ambitious spending goal of 5% of GDP on defense and
    security by 2035. This new figure is broken down into: 3.5% for core >military needs (troops, weapons, etc.), an increase from the
    previous 2% target. 1.5% for "militarily adjacent" projects such as >improving infrastructure (roads, bridges, ports), cybersecurity, and
    civic resilience. This new commitment was widely seen as a major
    political victory for Trump, who had been pushing for the higher
    number. Spain was the only nation to initially raise reservations
    about the 5% target, though it later signed the joint statement.

    Right, that's the new target they recently agreed on. What's your
    point? Why do you always quote text that says the same thing I just
    said? And with a misplaced air of knowing better?

    Yes, I do know better and it is completely 'misplaced' in this
    geriatric, xenophobic day care auxiliary.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 11:37:48 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Thu, 04 Dec 2025 05:08:38 +1100
    Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 10:47:24 -0700, lomonosov <bubbles@in.valid> wrote:

    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 18:29:42 -0500
    jmquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net> wrote:

    On 12/2/2025 2:42 PM, Graham wrote:

    That's so sad. Those tariffs are ridiculous.

    Jill

    That's so sense of you, and him.

    Those milk and steel tariffs Canajia imposes on America don't enter
    your flat and empty head, now do they?

    Can't you just say what you have to say instead of quoting endless
    texts that nobody's going to read?

    Context always riles up those who trade debate barbs based upon their
    own stunted narcissism.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 11:40:06 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 18:26:58 -0000 (UTC)
    Cindy Hamilton <chamilton5280@invalid.com> wrote:

    On 2025-12-03, Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:
    On 2025-12-03 4:46 a.m., Cindy Hamilton wrote:
    On 2025-12-03, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    A few years ago, the Dutch Evangelical Channel wanted to know why
    their American brethren and sisters voted for Trump. They asked
    them. It turned out that one of their main reasons to vote for
    Trump is that (he says) he's against abortion. I specifically
    remember one quote from the Americans: "We know Trump's not
    perfect, but if God chose him to do His work, who are we to say
    No?"

    Trump will say anything to anybody in order to get what he wants.
    Once he has what he wants, he discards them like a used tissue.



    We saw that on the news last night when they were being confronted
    about ordering a second strike on an alleged drug running boat.
    When the heat was turned up it they threw the naval commander under
    the bus. They need to be reminded that just following orders
    didn't work at the Nuremburg trials.

    They were reminded, by the six members of Congress whom Trump
    now wants executed for treason.


    Citation for that alleged "reminder"?

    No?

    Uh huh.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dave Smith@adavid.smith@sympatico.ca to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 13:45:44 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 2025-12-03 12:31 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 16:59:50 -0500
    Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:

    On 2025-12-02 4:12 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 12:42:01 -0700


    I think you just don't want to do the legwork on this, so much
    easier to blame Trump than Carney the protectionist barker, isn't
    it?

    Of course you don't want to do the legwork. You might be called to
    task to provide examples of Carney's protectionism.

    Ottawa calling from across the divide:

    https://www.pm.gc.ca/en/news/news-releases/2025/11/26/prime-minister-carney-announces-new-measures-protect-and-transform

    November 26, 2025
    Ottawa, Ontario
    The world is changing rapidly. The United States, the world’s largest economy, is fundamentally reshaping all its trade relationships, causing major disruption and upheaval for Canadians. It is time to transform our economy from one that is reliant on a single trade partner to one that is stronger, more self-sufficient, and resilient to global shocks. That means working with urgency and determination to transform our strategic industries so they can adapt, compete, and win in this new global environment.

    Canada’s new government has moved quickly to protect and strengthen the sectors most affected by U.S. tariffs – introducing new measures to help workers gain new skills, support businesses as they modernise and diversify, and boost domestic demand for Canadian goods. As we build the economy of the future, we’re ensuring workers and industries are ready to seize its opportunities.

    Building on previously announced measures to help transform the Canadian steel and softwood lumber industries, the following new initiatives were announced today.

    Canada’s new government will:

    Further limit foreign steel imports to ensure that Canadian steel producers have better access to the domestic market
    Canada will tighten the tariff rate quota levels for steel products from non-free trade agreement (FTA) partners from 50% to 20% of 2024 levels.
    For non-CUSMA partners with which we have an FTA, Canada will reduce tariff rate quota levels for steel products from 100% to 75% of 2024 levels.
    Canada will impose a global 25% tariff on targeted imported steel-derivative products such as wind towers, prefabricated buildings, fasteners, and wires.
    Canada will also toughen our border measures to combat foreign steel dumping and verify compliance with applicable surtaxes. To do so, we will equip the Canada Border Services Agency with a dedicated steel compliance team, enhanced detection of false declarations, and an expanded online reporting tool.
    To move away from relying on imported steel and to give Canadian companies time to adjust their supply chains to use Canadian steel, the temporary remission of Canadian tariffs on imports will end on January 31, 2026, for steel used in Canada for manufacturing, food and beverage packaging, and agricultural production.
    These measures will boost the competitiveness of Canadian steel producers by protecting them against trade diversion. They will also unlock over $1 billion in new domestic demand for Canadian steel.

    Make it easier to build with Canadian steel and Canadian lumber
    To make it more affordable to transport Canadian steel and lumber across the country, Canada will work with railway companies to cut freight rates for transporting Canadian steel and lumber interprovincially by 50%, beginning in Spring 2026.
    To maximise the use of Canadian softwood lumber in housing, Build Canada Homes will prioritise shovel-ready, multi-year projects that can begin within 12 months and that use Canadian wood products.
    With a funding allocation of roughly $700 million next year, Build Canada Homes – our new federal homebuilding agency – alone will create $70 to $140 million of new demand for Canadian wood products – and attract private and provincial capital to multiply its impact.
    Finally, Canada’s new government will implement our Buy Canadian Policy later this year, which requires that all contracts worth over $25 million prioritise Canadian materials – including steel and lumber. This will also apply across federal grants and contributions programs.

    Increase protections for Canadian steel and lumber workers and businesses so they can adapt and thrive in this new global landscape
    Canada will earmark more than $100 million over two years, starting in 2025-2026, in program costs to provide support to eligible employers in all sectors with an active Work-Sharing agreement and who commit to supporting training for employees working reduced hours. This measure will increase the income replacement for eligible workers, helping up to 26,000 Canadian workers in various sectors, including steel and lumber.
    To ensure companies have the financing and credit support they need to maintain and restructure their operations during this period of transformation, Canada will provide an additional $500 million to the Business Development Bank of Canada (BDC) Softwood Lumber Guarantee Program.
    To support softwood lumber firms facing liquidity pressures, Canada will earmark $500 million in funding under the Large Enterprise Tariff Loan facility.
    To make it easier for the forestry sector to access federal support, we will establish a single window to applications – a one-stop shop to help companies navigate our suite of support programs.
    To examine and report on how the forest industry can maintain its competitiveness over the long-term, Canada will launch a Canadian Forest Sector Transformation Task Force. This Task Force will seek input and recommendations from provinces, territories, and industry on managing the sector’s transformation.
    At this critical moment in Canada’s history, we are moving from reliance to resilience. Using Canadian steel and Canadian lumber, we will build Canada strong.




    Trump has a
    pickle up his butt about the supply management system

    You misspelled trade protectionism again.


    that Canada
    uses to stabilize supplies and prices. It provides stability for the
    farmers. There is provision for pretty steep tariffs on imported
    dairy products but not until they exceed a certain threshold.

    So it _IS_ trade protectionism then.


    No one
    has ever paid any of those tariffs because they have imported enough
    American dairy to even come close to having to pay.

    Whilst dumping Canajun dairy into our markets?

    Eh?

    https://www.farmprogress.com/management/does-canada-really-charge-a-270-tariff-on-milk-
    Does Canada really charge 270% on milk?

    On some dairy imports, yes. Canada essentially allows two avenues for dairy imports -- those within quota, and surplus stuff. It’s the latter where tariffs spike, because Canada’s whole system is built to avoid a surplus -- hence its name, “supply management.”

    Take milk, for instance. Within quota, the tariff is 7.5%. Over-quota
    milk faces a 241% tariff. Other over-quota rates include blended dairy
    powder at 270%. Duties rise to as high as 314% for other products,
    according to data from the World Trade Organization. Canadian officials
    argue that all countries subsidize dairy, including the U.S. -- Canada essentially does so indirectly by closing its borders and capping
    production.

    https://cheesereporter.com/news/2025/08/01/us-dairy-groups-criticize-nonfat-milk-solids-policies-of-canada-others-at-usitc-hearing/

    Washington—The nonfat milk solids policies of Canada, the European
    Union, India and Turkey were criticized by several dairy organizations
    at a US International Trade Commission (USITC) hearing here Monday.

    “Out of the leading global suppliers to the world nonfat milk solids markets, Canada’s distortionary policies are currently the most impactful and harmful on those markets,” according to USDEC and NMPF. “Canadian government policies that drive unsustainable surpluses are coupled with extensive industry subsidization and a complex pricing structure that leads to artificially low-priced products pushed out into the international market.

    “The egregiously anticompetitive nature of the Canadian policies harm American suppliers by undercutting US prices globally while simultaneously denying market access into Canada, both of which are clear contraventions of its trade agreements and international trade rules,” NMPF and USDEC added.

    Meanwhile, the European Union (EU) has built a casein production system
    that was substantially subsidized by European taxpayers under the
    Common Agriculture Policy (CAP). US exporters are still dealing with
    the resulting consequences of the EU’s anticompetitive policies that
    have propped up its domestic casein manufacturers, USDEC and NMPF noted.




    Meanwhile the US government subsidizes it's agriculture sector
    allowing it to dump it's products in other countries.


    https://www.politico.com/news/2025/11/23/canada-tariffs-trump-00663710

    Trump quietly holds off on Canada tariff increase

    11/23/2025 04:00 PM EST


    President Donald Trump has yet to follow through on his threat to impose an additional 10 percent tariff on Canadian imports, four weeks after he halted “all trade negotiations” over an anti-tariff ad the province of Ontario ran during the Major League Baseball World Series.

    “Because of their serious misrepresentation of the facts, and hostile act, I am increasing the Tariff on Canada by 10% over and above what they are paying now,” Trump wrote on Truth Social on Oct. 25, after announcing two days earlier that he was terminating trade talks over the the ”egregious” ad.

    Trump’s announcement had Canadian exporters preparing for a worst-case scenario: a sweeping levy layered on top of existing double-digit duties, which would have been particularly painful for industries like autos, where components cross the border multiple times before reaching their final form.

    But to date, the Trump administration hasn’t sent any official documentation ordering U.S. Customs and Border Protection to enforce
    the new, higher duty, and U.S. importers have not received any new
    regulatory guidance.

    The White House did not say whether it still plans to impose the tariff when asked for comment. But a separate U.S. official suggested the Trump administration had opted to hold off on additional duties — which would have sent tariffs on Canadian goods to 45 percent — and instead continue to dangle the threat as the two sides gear up for future talks.

    “The Canadians know what’s on the table,” said the official, granted anonymity to discuss private conversat

    Nice try, but those tariffs are a response to Trump's tariff orgy. \



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 12:03:56 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 13:45:44 -0500
    Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:
    On 2025-12-03 12:31 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 16:59:50 -0500
    Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:

    On 2025-12-02 4:12 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 12:42:01 -0700


    I think you just don't want to do the legwork on this, so much
    easier to blame Trump than Carney the protectionist barker, isn't
    it?

    Of course you don't want to do the legwork. You might be called to
    task to provide examples of Carney's protectionism.

    Ottawa calling from across the divide:

    https://www.pm.gc.ca/en/news/news-releases/2025/11/26/prime-minister-carney-announces-new-measures-protect-and-transform

    November 26, 2025
    Ottawa, Ontario
    The world is changing rapidly. The United States, the world’s
    largest economy, is fundamentally reshaping all its trade
    relationships, causing major disruption and upheaval for Canadians.
    It is time to transform our economy from one that is reliant on a
    single trade partner to one that is stronger, more self-sufficient,
    and resilient to global shocks. That means working with urgency and determination to transform our strategic industries so they can
    adapt, compete, and win in this new global environment.

    Canada’s new government has moved quickly to protect and strengthen
    the sectors most affected by U.S. tariffs – introducing new
    measures to help workers gain new skills, support businesses as
    they modernise and diversify, and boost domestic demand for
    Canadian goods. As we build the economy of the future, we’re
    ensuring workers and industries are ready to seize its
    opportunities.

    Building on previously announced measures to help transform the
    Canadian steel and softwood lumber industries, the following new initiatives were announced today.

    Canada’s new government will:

    Further limit foreign steel imports to ensure that Canadian steel
    producers have better access to the domestic market Canada will
    tighten the tariff rate quota levels for steel products from
    non-free trade agreement (FTA) partners from 50% to 20% of 2024
    levels. For non-CUSMA partners with which we have an FTA, Canada
    will reduce tariff rate quota levels for steel products from 100%
    to 75% of 2024 levels. Canada will impose a global 25% tariff on
    targeted imported steel-derivative products such as wind towers, prefabricated buildings, fasteners, and wires. Canada will also
    toughen our border measures to combat foreign steel dumping and
    verify compliance with applicable surtaxes. To do so, we will equip
    the Canada Border Services Agency with a dedicated steel compliance
    team, enhanced detection of false declarations, and an expanded
    online reporting tool. To move away from relying on imported steel
    and to give Canadian companies time to adjust their supply chains
    to use Canadian steel, the temporary remission of Canadian tariffs
    on imports will end on January 31, 2026, for steel used in Canada
    for manufacturing, food and beverage packaging, and agricultural production. These measures will boost the competitiveness of
    Canadian steel producers by protecting them against trade
    diversion. They will also unlock over $1 billion in new domestic
    demand for Canadian steel. Make it easier to build with Canadian
    steel and Canadian lumber To make it more affordable to transport
    Canadian steel and lumber across the country, Canada will work with
    railway companies to cut freight rates for transporting Canadian
    steel and lumber interprovincially by 50%, beginning in Spring
    2026. To maximise the use of Canadian softwood lumber in housing,
    Build Canada Homes will prioritise shovel-ready, multi-year
    projects that can begin within 12 months and that use Canadian wood products. With a funding allocation of roughly $700 million next
    year, Build Canada Homes – our new federal homebuilding agency –
    alone will create $70 to $140 million of new demand for Canadian
    wood products – and attract private and provincial capital to
    multiply its impact. Finally, Canada’s new government will
    implement our Buy Canadian Policy later this year, which requires
    that all contracts worth over $25 million prioritise Canadian
    materials – including steel and lumber. This will also apply across federal grants and contributions programs. Increase protections for Canadian steel and lumber workers and businesses so they can adapt
    and thrive in this new global landscape Canada will earmark more
    than $100 million over two years, starting in 2025-2026, in program
    costs to provide support to eligible employers in all sectors with
    an active Work-Sharing agreement and who commit to supporting
    training for employees working reduced hours. This measure will
    increase the income replacement for eligible workers, helping up to
    26,000 Canadian workers in various sectors, including steel and
    lumber. To ensure companies have the financing and credit support
    they need to maintain and restructure their operations during this
    period of transformation, Canada will provide an additional $500
    million to the Business Development Bank of Canada (BDC) Softwood
    Lumber Guarantee Program. To support softwood lumber firms facing
    liquidity pressures, Canada will earmark $500 million in funding
    under the Large Enterprise Tariff Loan facility. To make it easier
    for the forestry sector to access federal support, we will
    establish a single window to applications – a one-stop shop to help companies navigate our suite of support programs. To examine and
    report on how the forest industry can maintain its competitiveness
    over the long-term, Canada will launch a Canadian Forest Sector Transformation Task Force. This Task Force will seek input and recommendations from provinces, territories, and industry on
    managing the sector’s transformation. At this critical moment in Canada’s history, we are moving from reliance to resilience. Using Canadian steel and Canadian lumber, we will build Canada strong.




    Trump has a
    pickle up his butt about the supply management system

    You misspelled trade protectionism again.


    that Canada
    uses to stabilize supplies and prices. It provides stability for
    the farmers. There is provision for pretty steep tariffs on
    imported dairy products but not until they exceed a certain
    threshold.

    So it _IS_ trade protectionism then.


    No one
    has ever paid any of those tariffs because they have imported
    enough American dairy to even come close to having to pay.

    Whilst dumping Canajun dairy into our markets?

    Eh?

    https://www.farmprogress.com/management/does-canada-really-charge-a-270-tariff-on-milk-
    Does Canada really charge 270% on milk?

    On some dairy imports, yes. Canada essentially allows two avenues
    for dairy imports -- those within quota, and surplus stuff. It’s
    the latter where tariffs spike, because Canada’s whole system is
    built to avoid a surplus -- hence its name, “supply management.”

    Take milk, for instance. Within quota, the tariff is 7.5%.
    Over-quota milk faces a 241% tariff. Other over-quota rates include
    blended dairy powder at 270%. Duties rise to as high as 314% for
    other products, according to data from the World Trade
    Organization. Canadian officials argue that all countries subsidize
    dairy, including the U.S. -- Canada essentially does so indirectly
    by closing its borders and capping production.

    https://cheesereporter.com/news/2025/08/01/us-dairy-groups-criticize-nonfat-milk-solids-policies-of-canada-others-at-usitc-hearing/

    Washington—The nonfat milk solids policies of Canada, the European
    Union, India and Turkey were criticized by several dairy
    organizations at a US International Trade Commission (USITC)
    hearing here Monday.

    “Out of the leading global suppliers to the world nonfat milk
    solids markets, Canada’s distortionary policies are currently the
    most impactful and harmful on those markets,” according to USDEC
    and NMPF. “Canadian government policies that drive unsustainable surpluses are coupled with extensive industry subsidization and a
    complex pricing structure that leads to artificially low-priced
    products pushed out into the international market.

    “The egregiously anticompetitive nature of the Canadian policies
    harm American suppliers by undercutting US prices globally while simultaneously denying market access into Canada, both of which are
    clear contraventions of its trade agreements and international
    trade rules,” NMPF and USDEC added.

    Meanwhile, the European Union (EU) has built a casein production
    system that was substantially subsidized by European taxpayers
    under the Common Agriculture Policy (CAP). US exporters are still
    dealing with the resulting consequences of the EU’s anticompetitive policies that have propped up its domestic casein manufacturers,
    USDEC and NMPF noted.




    Meanwhile the US government subsidizes it's agriculture sector
    allowing it to dump it's products in other countries.


    https://www.politico.com/news/2025/11/23/canada-tariffs-trump-00663710

    Trump quietly holds off on Canada tariff increase

    11/23/2025 04:00 PM EST


    President Donald Trump has yet to follow through on his threat to
    impose an additional 10 percent tariff on Canadian imports, four
    weeks after he halted “all trade negotiations” over an anti-tariff
    ad the province of Ontario ran during the Major League Baseball
    World Series.

    “Because of their serious misrepresentation of the facts, and
    hostile act, I am increasing the Tariff on Canada by 10% over and
    above what they are paying now,” Trump wrote on Truth Social on
    Oct. 25, after announcing two days earlier that he was terminating
    trade talks over the the ”egregious” ad.

    Trump’s announcement had Canadian exporters preparing for a
    worst-case scenario: a sweeping levy layered on top of existing double-digit duties, which would have been particularly painful for industries like autos, where components cross the border multiple
    times before reaching their final form.

    But to date, the Trump administration hasn’t sent any official documentation ordering U.S. Customs and Border Protection to enforce
    the new, higher duty, and U.S. importers have not received any new regulatory guidance.

    The White House did not say whether it still plans to impose the
    tariff when asked for comment. But a separate U.S. official
    suggested the Trump administration had opted to hold off on
    additional duties — which would have sent tariffs on Canadian goods
    to 45 percent — and instead continue to dangle the threat as the
    two sides gear up for future talks.

    “The Canadians know what’s on the table,” said the official,
    granted anonymity to discuss private conversat

    Nice try, but those tariffs are a response to Trump's tariff orgy. \
    Sad lie, Canajun milk and steel tariffs long preceded any of Trump's
    actions. https://www.commenda.io/blog/canadian-tariffs-on-us-goods-before-trump/ Evolution of Canada–US Trade Liberalization
    Early Tariffs: Reciprocal Treaties (1854-1935)
    The US and British North America Agreement of 1854: Eliminated surcharges on raw materials that the rest of the world considers gold, grain, and timber, commercially important.
    Repeal & Protectionism: The agreement was terminated in 1866, which resulted in Canada imposing taxes for the purposes of raising cash to protect emerging businesses.
    Auto Pact (Canada–USA Automotive Products Agreement, 1965)
    Rule on Regional Content: Vehicles and parts with 50% or more content from Canada or the US were allowed duty-free.
    Investment Surge: There was an increased cross-border investment in auto assembly, and there were more integrated supply chains.
    Canada–US Free Trade Agreement (CUSFTA, 1989)
    Phase-Out Schedule: Over 10 years, there was a 98% reduction in bilateral duties.
    Dispute Resolution: The Introduced Binational Panels were displacing domestic courts for anti-dumping and countervail cases.
    Service & Investment Liberalization: Extends beyond goods and covers intellectual property, financial services, and public procurement.
    NAFTA (1994–2020)
    Tri-lateral Duty Elimination: Rules of Origin (ROO) were unified in Canada, the USA, and Mexico for 99% of industrial goods.
    Automotive Requirements: 62.5% regional content required (75% USMCA). Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Lawsuit by corporations against sovereign states for breach of the treaty.
    Transition to USMCA (2020–)
    Auto Content Increase: Duty exemption now requires 75% regional content.
    Sunset Clause: The term is 16 years, subject to review after six years in a row.
    Improved Access to Dairy Products: Allocated 3.6% additional American quota to Canada.
    Download your free Pre-Incorporation checklist
    We’ve put together all of the documents and details you need to figure out before you open a company in the Canada.
    Overview of US Canada Trade Before 2018
    2017 Bilateral Trade: US$685 billion in two-way goods.
    US Exports to Canada:
    Machinery and Electrical Equipment Exported from Canada – 28 %
    Vehicles and Parts – 14 %
    Mineral Fuels and Oils -10 %
    Plastic and Articles – 7 %
    Surplus Balance: Approximately $17 billion for the United States
    NAFTA’s near-complete duty elimination fostered just-in-time inventories, cross-border manufacturing, and synchronized logistics with the exception of explicit national exemptions.
    General Duty Elimination Under NAFTA
    Rules of Origin (ROO)
    Verifiable Origin: A regional content test needs to be passed.
    Auto Example: Drives business value greater than 62.5 % in terms of value added in North America, hence why the Engine & Transmission parts are often reclassified via binding rulings.
    De Minimis Exemption: Qualifying under final appraised value with the use of up to 7 non-originating inputs.
    Simplified Documentation
    The self-certification form of the NAFTA Certificate of Origin solved complex paperwork problems.
    Advance Rulings became a thing with the binding classification of CBSA and origin determinations from the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA).
    Businesses used the ROO to change their supply chains, which meant sourcing subcomponents regionally to keep the status of no duty.
    One platform to simplify global tax and compliance
    See why high-growth companies trust Commenda
    Schedule a call
    Protected Sectors & Tariff-Rate Quotas
    Apart from 99 % of all goods, where there are supply-managed sectors or sensitive industries under the TRQ
    Dairy, Poultry, and Eggs
    Managing Supply: Produce control via quotas and setting prices ensures the farm’s profit.
    TRQ System:
    In-quota: Preferential rates with limited yearly volumes (ex, 3%-5%). Over-Quota: Prohibitive duties of 245% in some cases.
    Annual Quotas: Allocated based on historical importer share or auction to bids. Advertised in the Canadian Gazette.
    Alcohol and Tobacco
    Cigarettes: CAD$0.3465+ federal excise taxes per stick.
    Wine & Beer: 15%-6% depending on the type, strength, and sweetness.
    Spirits: CAD$2.87/L +2.5% of the value.
    Cultural Industries
    Recordings and Films: 6%- 16% tariffs on foreign-produced media.
    Broadcasting and Publications: Responsibilities up to 18% protect Canadian content; books with ≥75% Canadian authorship enter duty-free.
    For other TRQ regulations, check the Canada Export and Agriculture policies of Agri-Foods Canada.
    The Softwood Lumber Dispute
    One of the longest disputes between Canada and the US over softwood borders. First noted over NAFTA.
    Technical Basis
    Fee Stumpage Canadian: Fees set by the provincial or the crown lands of Canadian stumpage. Alleged to charge base subsidies by default.
    Countervail Actions-USA
    1982: First introduced 15% additional export taxes.
    2001: 27% peak in duties.
    Trade Remedies and Panels
    Chapter 19 Panels: International separate from the national dispute resolution, and renegotiate within NAFTA. The US came to the wrong consensus on many determinations, yet contracted duties came back.
    Seasonal Changes: Cycles are bred on specific mills and regions for set durations.
    Economic Impact
    Industry Consolidation: Merged or closed Canadian mills, while US firms had higher input costs.
    Integrated Mills: Some operations repatriated value associated with US-owned Canadian operations to avoid paying duties.
    Rules of Origin in Depth
    To award only truly regional goods, NAFTA ROO implemented key guidelines such as:
    Automotive: 62.5% of the contents must be regional, and engine or transmission thresholds.
    Textiles: Exceptions for certain fibers, 100% yarn, and fabric must be from North America.
    De Minimis: Non-originating content not exceeding 7 percent is allowed if the required percentage of the total value test is met.
    Diagonal Cumulation: EU Origin parts included in some NAFTA sectors are subject to defined limits.
    Advance Rulings: Reduction of audit risk was achieved when companies received binding ROO clarifications from the CBSA.
    Tariff-Rate Quota (TRQ) Mechanics
    Quota Allocation
    Annual Notices: Set volumes, rates, and licensing procedures, which are published in the Canada Gazette Annexes.
    Allocation Methods:
    Historical importers allocate quota shares.
    Auctioning of returned or unallocated quota.
    Random selections for small distributors.
    Strategic Responses
    Quota Syndicates: Collaborations between US producers and Canadian importers aimed at the EU red lines.
    Local Processing: Intermediate ingredients are imported under bond and undergo minimal processing to be classified as Canadian origin.
    Bonded Warehouses: Market delivery occurs post-quota clearance, at which point duties are deferred until quotas clear.
    Business Strategies Under NAFTA
    Landed-Cost Modeling
    Cost Components: FOB price + freight + insurance + in-quota or over-quota duties + excise + GST/HST.
    Example: The US cheese goes for USD 8/kg, freight USD 0.50, in-quota duty 5% (USD 0.425), and over-quota duty 245% (USD 19.60), deadweight loss substantially changes the margin.
    Supply-Chain Engineering
    Free Trade Zone Assembly: Duty-free import of inputs, assembly of final goods in Canada, sold as Canadian origin under NAFTA rules.
    Quota Partnerships: Attain TRQs by teaming up with Canadian importers who already have established businesses.
    Advance Rulings & Compliance Audits: Pre-shipment classification and in-house ROO audits reduce the risk of incurring duties after the fact.
    Transition to USMCA: Continuity and Change
    Notable changes made under USMCA included:
    Automotive Content: Changed from 62.5% to 75%.
    Sunset Review: 16-year term and review after 6 years.
    Enhanced Dairy Access: An extra 3.6% US quota on top of what was put in place during NAFTA.
    WTO consistency: kept them for TRQs and the over-quota duty scheme for supply-managed products.
    The fine print of NAFTA allows businesses to “effortlessly” adjust to the changes brought on by USMCA.
    Sector Profiles: Deep Dives
    Dairy & Supply Management
    Provincial Marketing Boards: Oversee production and quotas apportionment.
    TRQ Details: In-quota butter 7 % duty on 9,200 t; over-quota 245 %.
    Example: A U.S. butter exporter shipping 100 t: 9,200 t at 7 % duty, 90,800 t effectively barred.
    Softwood Lumber
    Crown vs. Private: Canadian Crown fees versus US private market pricing. Periodic Reviews: USITC and DOC investigations every 5 years.
    Panel Decisions: Distrust led to mixed outcry and outcome, duty suspensions of the interim.
    Cultural Goods
    Publication Duties: 0 % for domestic-origin and 18% for foreign bi-monthly periodicals.
    Audiovisual: 6%-16% to Canadian content quotas for broadcasters.
    Rules of Engagement for Importers
    Verify HS Codes & Origin: Secure advance rulings from CBSA to lock in duty treatment.
    Monitor TRQ Announcements: Canada Gazette announcements in January each year signal allocations and deadlines.
    Model Multiple Scenarios: Within-quota versus over-quota duties, freight differences, and currency shifts.
    Invest in Compliance: Internal ROO audits, classification checks, and advice from legal counsel will minimize retroactivity.
    How Commenda Helps Cross-Border Businesses
    Entity Structuring: Constitute Canadian subsidiary border wardens to clear distributor Vegas and claim origins.
    Quota and Licensing Support: Assist with the TRQ application and auction processes.
    Binding Rulings: Aid in applying for advanced tariff and origin determinations from CBSA.
    Landed-Cost Analytics: Dashboards provide real-time analysis of freight, duties, taxes, and other fees to provide clear visibility.
    For a personalized compliance audit on cross-border trade, reach out to Commenda Trade Solutions.
    Conclusion
    Pre-Trump era U.S.-Canada trade was mainly defined by NAFTA’s overarching duty eliminations, moderated by protective benchmarks for softwood lumber, dairy & poultry, cultural industries, and tobacco. Firms that had an understanding of Canadian tariffs on US goods pre-Trump utilized under bonds, TRQs, advance rulings, warehouse strategies, and supply chain design to gain optimal cost of goods sold for the free flow of goods. Reserving sabbatical inequities lessons from NAFTA era restrictions, with USMCA introduced alongside shifts to origin and quota limits, USMCA terminology origin assault borders reinforces many pre-2018 era policies as paramount. Insight coupled with Commenda support equips nations for strategic trade and maximizes the potential offered by integrated North American supply chains.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dave Smith@adavid.smith@sympatico.ca to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 14:08:20 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 2025-12-03 12:47 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 18:29:42 -0500
    jmquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net> wrote:

    Thanks, Ed!! I'm really glad that you are using the scoop. I
    delivered some tea caddies to the Tea Trader the other day and
    President Spray-tan has made it too difficult to deliver to the USA
    at the moment. Not only that but Canada Post informed me that if I
    were to send a xmas present to someone in the USA, I would have to
    pay the duty up front! Of course, that doesn't affect commercial
    operations but apparently the paperwork is a nightmare.

    That's so sad. Those tariffs are ridiculous.

    Jill

    That's so sense of you, and him.

    Those milk and steel tariffs Canajia imposes on America don't enter your
    flat and empty head, now do they?

    Try looking at the time line. Canada put tariffs on American steel in
    response to the tariffs that Trump slapped in Canadian steel and
    aluminum. The tariffs on dairy are in accordance with our supply
    management system through which we maintain stability in the
    agricultural system. It enures a constant supply of farm products and stabilized prices. The US, OTOH, heavily subsidizes farmers. Those
    subsidies leave them with surplus products that they would love to dump
    on foreign markets.

    Tariff keeps whining about 300% tariffs on American dairy but there has
    never been any paid. It is not an across the boar tariff. There is a
    tariff rate quota system that provides for a quota of American dairy
    products that can be imported duty free. It is only when that quota has
    been exceeded that tariffs would be applied. They have never come close
    to reaching that quota.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 12:25:33 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 14:08:20 -0500
    Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:
    On 2025-12-03 12:47 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 18:29:42 -0500
    jmquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net> wrote:

    Thanks, Ed!! I'm really glad that you are using the scoop. I
    delivered some tea caddies to the Tea Trader the other day and
    President Spray-tan has made it too difficult to deliver to the
    USA at the moment. Not only that but Canada Post informed me that
    if I were to send a xmas present to someone in the USA, I would
    have to pay the duty up front! Of course, that doesn't affect
    commercial operations but apparently the paperwork is a
    nightmare.

    That's so sad. Those tariffs are ridiculous.

    Jill

    That's so sense of you, and him.

    Those milk and steel tariffs Canajia imposes on America don't enter
    your flat and empty head, now do they?

    Try looking at the time line. Canada put tariffs on American steel in response to the tariffs that Trump slapped in Canadian steel and
    https://www.commenda.io/blog/canadian-tariffs-on-us-goods-before-trump/
    Dairy, Poultry, and Eggs
    Managing Supply: Produce control via quotas and setting prices ensures the farm’s profit.
    TRQ System:
    In-quota: Preferential rates with limited yearly volumes (ex, 3%-5%). Over-Quota: Prohibitive duties of 245% in some cases.
    Annual Quotas: Allocated based on historical importer share or auction
    to bids. Advertised in the Canadian Gazette.
    AI Overview
    Canadian steel protectionism has a long history, dating back to the National Policy of the late 19th century which significantly increased tariffs to protect domestic iron and steel producers. This was followed by periods of trade liberalization, but concerns about foreign competition led to renewed protectionist measures, including import quotas in the 1960s, and anti-dumping investigations and measures in recent years to counter what are seen as unfairly priced imports. The government has also intervened with financial support and programs to help the industry adapt to global competition, as seen in measures introduced in 2025 to support workers and companies.
    Key periods and events
    19th Century: The National Policy (1879) significantly raised tariffs on manufactured goods, including iron and steel, to double the previous rates to stimulate domestic production.
    1960s: Faced with increasing foreign competition, the government
    proposed capping steel imports at slightly under 10% of domestic
    consumption in response to clamoring from the industry. https://brendonbeebe.substack.com/p/history-of-tariffs-between-canada Post-Confederation Protectionism (1867–1910)
    After Confederation, Canada adopted a decisively protectionist stance
    on tariffs, especially under Prime Minister John A. Macdonald’s
    National Policy. Macdonald’s National Policy, first campaigned on in
    1878 and implemented in 1879, imposed high tariffs on imported
    manufactured goods to protect Canadian industries (National Policy - Wikipedia). These tariffs, often in the 15–25% range or higher, were
    designed to nurture Canada’s infant manufacturing sector by shielding
    it from the dominant U.S. industrial economy. The National Policy was a cornerstone of Canada’s economic strategy: it aimed to create a self-sufficient national market, spur industrialization (particularly
    in Ontario and Quebec), and fund the construction of transcontinental
    railways and infrastructure (National Policy - Wikipedia). The
    protective tariff wall was popular in central Canada’s industrial
    circles and with voters who saw it as nation-building, and it endured
    for decades (1879 into the mid-20th century) (National Policy -
    Wikipedia).
    Dairy Products: Canada’s dairy industry is heavily protected by a
    supply management system, which uses production quotas and steep
    tariffs to control imports. As a result, Canada has maintained very
    high tariffs (often in the 200–300% range) on dairy imports to prevent foreign milk, cheese, and poultry from undercutting domestic farmers (PolitiFact | Donald Trump says Canada levies 270 percent tariff on
    dairy. That's basically right). For decades, U.S. officials and dairy
    farmers have complained that these tariffs shut them out of the
    Canadian market. However, the U.S. also accepted Canada’s system in
    past trade deals – effectively a political trade-off to secure wider
    free trade (PolitiFact | Donald Trump says Canada levies 270 percent
    tariff on dairy. That's basically right). Tensions rose in the late
    2010s when U.S. President Trump repeatedly blasted Canada’s dairy
    tariffs (citing figures like a “270% tariff on milk” as unfair)
    (PolitiFact | Donald Trump says Canada levies 270 percent tariff on
    dairy. That's basically right). While NAFTA had exempted Canadian supply-managed goods from tariff elimination, the 2020 USMCA deal
    forced modest openings in Canada’s dairy market. Under USMCA, Canada
    agreed to set up new tariff-rate quotas (TRQs) allowing specific
    quantities of U.S. dairy products to enter Canada at lower tariffs
    (U.S.-Canada Trade Relations). This concession, roughly equal to a few
    percent of Canada’s dairy consumption, was a win for U.S. exporters,
    though Canada still effectively protects the majority of its dairy
    market.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Graham@g.stereo@shaw.ca to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 15:14:17 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 2025-12-03 12:08 p.m., Dave Smith wrote:
    On 2025-12-03 12:47 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 18:29:42 -0500
    jmquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net> wrote:

    Thanks, Ed!! I'm really glad that you are using the scoop. I
    delivered some tea caddies to the Tea Trader the other day and
    President Spray-tan has made it too difficult to deliver to the USA
    at the moment. Not only that but Canada Post informed me that if I
    were to send a xmas present to someone in the USA, I would have to
    pay the duty up front! Of course, that doesn't affect commercial
    operations but apparently the paperwork is a nightmare.

    That's so sad.  Those tariffs are ridiculous.

    Jill

    That's so sense of you, and him.

    Those milk and steel tariffs Canajia imposes on America don't enter your
    flat and empty head, now do they?

    Try looking at the time line. Canada put tariffs on American steel in response to the tariffs that Trump slapped in Canadian steel and
    aluminum.  The tariffs  on dairy  are in accordance with our supply management system through which we maintain stability in the
    agricultural system.  It enures a constant supply of farm products and stabilized prices.  The US, OTOH, heavily subsidizes farmers.  Those subsidies leave them with surplus products that they would love to dump
    on foreign markets.

    Tariff keeps whining about 300% tariffs on American dairy but there has never been any paid. It is not an across the boar tariff. There is a
    tariff rate quota system that provides for a quota of American dairy products that can be imported duty free. It is only when that quota has
    been exceeded that tariffs would be applied. They have never come close
    to reaching that quota.


    Isn't a lot of US milk tainted from the use of growth hormones?
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Cindy Hamilton@chamilton5280@invalid.com to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 22:37:54 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 2025-12-03, Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    Isn't a lot of US milk tainted from the use of growth hormones?

    About 15%. It's pretty easy to find milk labeled "rBHT-free",
    "rBST-free" or "from cows not treated with artificial hormones".

    The cheapest milk at my grocery store is hormone-free.

    Of course, with milk that's _in_ things, you can't tell.
    --
    Cindy Hamilton
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dave Smith@adavid.smith@sympatico.ca to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 17:51:04 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 2025-12-03 5:14 p.m., Graham wrote:
    On 2025-12-03 12:08 p.m., Dave Smith wrote:

    Tariff keeps whining about 300% tariffs on American dairy but there
    has never been any paid. It is not an across the boar tariff. There is
    a tariff rate quota system that provides for a quota of American dairy
    products that can be imported duty free. It is only when that quota
    has been exceeded that tariffs would be applied. They have never come
    close to reaching that quota.


    Isn't a lot of US milk tainted from the use of growth hormones?

    That is what I have heard.

    I know people who whine about hormones in chicken and, despite their
    cross border shopping they refuse to buy American shipping. I have some understanding about how the chicken processing business works. Chickens
    hit market weight and need to be slaughtered and butchered. The
    processing plants have limited capacity. I worked near the border and
    used to see the trucks carrying chickens. One day they might be outbound loaded with chickens and coming back empty. A day or two later they
    would be going out empty and coming back loaded and heading to a local processing plant so the fact is that if you live near the border you
    know there is no guarantee about the source.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 16:06:57 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 15:14:17 -0700
    Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:
    On 2025-12-03 12:08 p.m., Dave Smith wrote:
    On 2025-12-03 12:47 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 18:29:42 -0500
    jmquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net> wrote:

    Thanks, Ed!! I'm really glad that you are using the scoop. I
    delivered some tea caddies to the Tea Trader the other day and
    President Spray-tan has made it too difficult to deliver to the
    USA at the moment. Not only that but Canada Post informed me
    that if I were to send a xmas present to someone in the USA, I
    would have to pay the duty up front! Of course, that doesn't
    affect commercial operations but apparently the paperwork is a
    nightmare.

    That's so sad.  Those tariffs are ridiculous.

    Jill

    That's so sense of you, and him.

    Those milk and steel tariffs Canajia imposes on America don't
    enter your flat and empty head, now do they?

    Try looking at the time line. Canada put tariffs on American steel
    in response to the tariffs that Trump slapped in Canadian steel and aluminum.  The tariffs  on dairy  are in accordance with our supply management system through which we maintain stability in the
    agricultural system.  It enures a constant supply of farm products
    and stabilized prices.  The US, OTOH, heavily subsidizes farmers.
    Those subsidies leave them with surplus products that they would
    love to dump on foreign markets.

    Tariff keeps whining about 300% tariffs on American dairy but there
    has never been any paid. It is not an across the boar tariff. There
    is a tariff rate quota system that provides for a quota of American
    dairy products that can be imported duty free. It is only when that
    quota has been exceeded that tariffs would be applied. They have
    never come close to reaching that quota.


    Isn't a lot of US milk tainted from the use of growth hormones?
    Lose an argument, deploy red herrings. https://corporate.walmart.com/news/2008/03/23/wal-mart-offers-private-label-milk-produced-without-artificial-growth-hormone
    https://www.maplehill.com/post/conventional-milk-vs-organic-milk-vs-grass-fed-organic-milk-what-s-the-difference
    https://horizon.com/organic-dairy-products/organic-milk/organic-whole-milk/
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 16:12:52 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 17:51:04 -0500
    Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:

    I worked near the border and
    used to see the trucks carrying chickens. One day they might be
    outbound loaded with chickens and coming back empty.

    Ut oh...

    https://youtu.be/vhmJiGxQ_9U

    Oh yes...those chickens are up to something...

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dave Smith@adavid.smith@sympatico.ca to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 18:15:07 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 2025-12-03 6:06 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 15:14:17 -0700
    Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    On 2025-12-03 12:08 p.m., Dave Smith wrote:
    On 2025-12-03 12:47 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 18:29:42 -0500
    jmquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net> wrote:

    Thanks, Ed!! I'm really glad that you are using the scoop. I
    delivered some tea caddies to the Tea Trader the other day and
    President Spray-tan has made it too difficult to deliver to the
    USA at the moment. Not only that but Canada Post informed me
    that if I were to send a xmas present to someone in the USA, I
    would have to pay the duty up front! Of course, that doesn't
    affect commercial operations but apparently the paperwork is a
    nightmare.

    That's so sad.  Those tariffs are ridiculous.

    Jill

    That's so sense of you, and him.

    Those milk and steel tariffs Canajia imposes on America don't
    enter your flat and empty head, now do they?

    Try looking at the time line. Canada put tariffs on American steel
    in response to the tariffs that Trump slapped in Canadian steel and
    aluminum.  The tariffs  on dairy  are in accordance with our supply
    management system through which we maintain stability in the
    agricultural system.  It enures a constant supply of farm products
    and stabilized prices.  The US, OTOH, heavily subsidizes farmers.
    Those subsidies leave them with surplus products that they would
    love to dump on foreign markets.

    Tariff keeps whining about 300% tariffs on American dairy but there
    has never been any paid. It is not an across the boar tariff. There
    is a tariff rate quota system that provides for a quota of American
    dairy products that can be imported duty free. It is only when that
    quota has been exceeded that tariffs would be applied. They have
    never come close to reaching that quota.


    Isn't a lot of US milk tainted from the use of growth hormones?

    Lose an argument, deploy red herrings.

    What red herring? There is a significant percentage of American milk
    that has come from cows that had been treated with artificial hormones.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 16:24:10 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 18:15:07 -0500
    Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:
    On 2025-12-03 6:06 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 15:14:17 -0700
    Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    On 2025-12-03 12:08 p.m., Dave Smith wrote:
    On 2025-12-03 12:47 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 18:29:42 -0500
    jmquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net> wrote:

    Thanks, Ed!! I'm really glad that you are using the scoop. I
    delivered some tea caddies to the Tea Trader the other day and
    President Spray-tan has made it too difficult to deliver to the
    USA at the moment. Not only that but Canada Post informed me
    that if I were to send a xmas present to someone in the USA, I
    would have to pay the duty up front! Of course, that doesn't
    affect commercial operations but apparently the paperwork is a
    nightmare.

    That's so sad.  Those tariffs are ridiculous.

    Jill

    That's so sense of you, and him.

    Those milk and steel tariffs Canajia imposes on America don't
    enter your flat and empty head, now do they?

    Try looking at the time line. Canada put tariffs on American steel
    in response to the tariffs that Trump slapped in Canadian steel
    and aluminum.  The tariffs  on dairy  are in accordance with our
    supply management system through which we maintain stability in
    the agricultural system.  It enures a constant supply of farm
    products and stabilized prices.  The US, OTOH, heavily subsidizes
    farmers. Those subsidies leave them with surplus products that
    they would love to dump on foreign markets.

    Tariff keeps whining about 300% tariffs on American dairy but
    there has never been any paid. It is not an across the boar
    tariff. There is a tariff rate quota system that provides for a
    quota of American dairy products that can be imported duty free.
    It is only when that quota has been exceeded that tariffs would
    be applied. They have never come close to reaching that quota.


    Isn't a lot of US milk tainted from the use of growth hormones?

    Lose an argument, deploy red herrings.

    What red herring?
    Yours.
    This was about tariffs and dumping after all.
    There is a significant percentage of American milk
    that has come from cows that had been treated with artificial
    hormones.
    Yeah ...so?
    Should it be tariffed out of the market?
    You going to go after that BSE-laden Alberta beef next? https://www.thedairysite.com/news/58/alberta-hotspot-for-mad-cow-disease-says-r-calf
    ALBERTA - The Canadian Food Inspection Agency confirmed the detection
    of the country's eighth case of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE),
    or mad cow disease in an Alberta beef cow. This is Canada's fifth mad
    cow case this year and overall eighth since 2003. https://inspection.canada.ca/en/animal-health/terrestrial-animals/diseases/reportable/canada/confirmed-cases-bse
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dave Smith@adavid.smith@sympatico.ca to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 19:20:03 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 2025-12-03 6:24 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 18:15:07 -0500
    Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:

    On 2025-12-03 6:06 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 15:14:17 -0700
    Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    On 2025-12-03 12:08 p.m., Dave Smith wrote:
    On 2025-12-03 12:47 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 18:29:42 -0500
    jmquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net> wrote:

    Thanks, Ed!! I'm really glad that you are using the scoop. I
    delivered some tea caddies to the Tea Trader the other day and >>>>>>>> President Spray-tan has made it too difficult to deliver to the >>>>>>>> USA at the moment. Not only that but Canada Post informed me
    that if I were to send a xmas present to someone in the USA, I >>>>>>>> would have to pay the duty up front! Of course, that doesn't
    affect commercial operations but apparently the paperwork is a >>>>>>>> nightmare.

    That's so sad.  Those tariffs are ridiculous.

    Jill

    That's so sense of you, and him.

    Those milk and steel tariffs Canajia imposes on America don't
    enter your flat and empty head, now do they?

    Try looking at the time line. Canada put tariffs on American steel
    in response to the tariffs that Trump slapped in Canadian steel
    and aluminum.  The tariffs  on dairy  are in accordance with our
    supply management system through which we maintain stability in
    the agricultural system.  It enures a constant supply of farm
    products and stabilized prices.  The US, OTOH, heavily subsidizes
    farmers. Those subsidies leave them with surplus products that
    they would love to dump on foreign markets.

    Tariff keeps whining about 300% tariffs on American dairy but
    there has never been any paid. It is not an across the boar
    tariff. There is a tariff rate quota system that provides for a
    quota of American dairy products that can be imported duty free.
    It is only when that quota has been exceeded that tariffs would
    be applied. They have never come close to reaching that quota.


    Isn't a lot of US milk tainted from the use of growth hormones?

    Lose an argument, deploy red herrings.

    What red herring?

    Yours.

    This was about tariffs and dumping after all.

    There is a significant percentage of American milk
    that has come from cows that had been treated with artificial
    hormones.


    Yeah ...so?

    Should it be tariffed out of the market?

    You going to go after that BSE-laden Alberta beef next?

    https://www.thedairysite.com/news/58/alberta-hotspot-for-mad-cow-disease-says-r-calf

    ALBERTA - The Canadian Food Inspection Agency confirmed the detection
    of the country's eighth case of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE),
    or mad cow disease in an Alberta beef cow. This is Canada's fifth mad
    cow case this year and overall eighth since 2003.


    https://inspection.canada.ca/en/animal-health/terrestrial-animals/diseases/reportable/canada/confirmed-cases-bse



    Wow. Twenty two years ago.... and they caught it.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 17:31:31 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 19:20:03 -0500
    Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:
    On 2025-12-03 6:24 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 18:15:07 -0500
    Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:

    On 2025-12-03 6:06 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 15:14:17 -0700
    Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    On 2025-12-03 12:08 p.m., Dave Smith wrote:
    On 2025-12-03 12:47 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 18:29:42 -0500
    jmquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net> wrote:

    Thanks, Ed!! I'm really glad that you are using the scoop. I >>>>>>>> delivered some tea caddies to the Tea Trader the other day
    and President Spray-tan has made it too difficult to deliver >>>>>>>> to the USA at the moment. Not only that but Canada Post
    informed me that if I were to send a xmas present to someone >>>>>>>> in the USA, I would have to pay the duty up front! Of
    course, that doesn't affect commercial operations but
    apparently the paperwork is a nightmare.

    That's so sad.  Those tariffs are ridiculous.

    Jill

    That's so sense of you, and him.

    Those milk and steel tariffs Canajia imposes on America don't
    enter your flat and empty head, now do they?

    Try looking at the time line. Canada put tariffs on American
    steel in response to the tariffs that Trump slapped in Canadian
    steel and aluminum.  The tariffs  on dairy  are in accordance
    with our supply management system through which we maintain
    stability in the agricultural system.  It enures a constant
    supply of farm products and stabilized prices.  The US, OTOH,
    heavily subsidizes farmers. Those subsidies leave them with
    surplus products that they would love to dump on foreign
    markets.

    Tariff keeps whining about 300% tariffs on American dairy but
    there has never been any paid. It is not an across the boar
    tariff. There is a tariff rate quota system that provides for a
    quota of American dairy products that can be imported duty free.
    It is only when that quota has been exceeded that tariffs would
    be applied. They have never come close to reaching that quota.


    Isn't a lot of US milk tainted from the use of growth hormones?

    Lose an argument, deploy red herrings.

    What red herring?

    Yours.

    This was about tariffs and dumping after all.

    There is a significant percentage of American milk
    that has come from cows that had been treated with artificial
    hormones.


    Yeah ...so?

    Should it be tariffed out of the market?

    You going to go after that BSE-laden Alberta beef next?

    https://www.thedairysite.com/news/58/alberta-hotspot-for-mad-cow-disease-says-r-calf

    ALBERTA - The Canadian Food Inspection Agency confirmed the
    detection of the country's eighth case of bovine spongiform
    encephalopathy (BSE), or mad cow disease in an Alberta beef cow.
    This is Canada's fifth mad cow case this year and overall eighth
    since 2003.


    https://inspection.canada.ca/en/animal-health/terrestrial-animals/diseases/reportable/canada/confirmed-cases-bse



    Wow. Twenty two years ago.... and they caught it.


    Tsk...
    They have had cases since then, you lying asshat.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dave Smith@adavid.smith@sympatico.ca to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 20:21:38 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 2025-12-03 7:31 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 19:20:03 -0500
    Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:

    On 2025-12-03 6:24 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 18:15:07 -0500
    Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:

    On 2025-12-03 6:06 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 15:14:17 -0700
    Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    On 2025-12-03 12:08 p.m., Dave Smith wrote:
    On 2025-12-03 12:47 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 18:29:42 -0500
    jmquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net> wrote:

    Thanks, Ed!! I'm really glad that you are using the scoop. I >>>>>>>>>> delivered some tea caddies to the Tea Trader the other day >>>>>>>>>> and President Spray-tan has made it too difficult to deliver >>>>>>>>>> to the USA at the moment. Not only that but Canada Post
    informed me that if I were to send a xmas present to someone >>>>>>>>>> in the USA, I would have to pay the duty up front! Of
    course, that doesn't affect commercial operations but
    apparently the paperwork is a nightmare.

    That's so sad.  Those tariffs are ridiculous.

    Jill

    That's so sense of you, and him.

    Those milk and steel tariffs Canajia imposes on America don't
    enter your flat and empty head, now do they?

    Try looking at the time line. Canada put tariffs on American
    steel in response to the tariffs that Trump slapped in Canadian
    steel and aluminum.  The tariffs  on dairy  are in accordance >>>>>>> with our supply management system through which we maintain
    stability in the agricultural system.  It enures a constant
    supply of farm products and stabilized prices.  The US, OTOH,
    heavily subsidizes farmers. Those subsidies leave them with
    surplus products that they would love to dump on foreign
    markets.

    Tariff keeps whining about 300% tariffs on American dairy but
    there has never been any paid. It is not an across the boar
    tariff. There is a tariff rate quota system that provides for a
    quota of American dairy products that can be imported duty free. >>>>>>> It is only when that quota has been exceeded that tariffs would
    be applied. They have never come close to reaching that quota.


    Isn't a lot of US milk tainted from the use of growth hormones?

    Lose an argument, deploy red herrings.

    What red herring?

    Yours.

    This was about tariffs and dumping after all.

    There is a significant percentage of American milk
    that has come from cows that had been treated with artificial
    hormones.


    Yeah ...so?

    Should it be tariffed out of the market?

    You going to go after that BSE-laden Alberta beef next?

    https://www.thedairysite.com/news/58/alberta-hotspot-for-mad-cow-disease-says-r-calf

    ALBERTA - The Canadian Food Inspection Agency confirmed the
    detection of the country's eighth case of bovine spongiform
    encephalopathy (BSE), or mad cow disease in an Alberta beef cow.
    This is Canada's fifth mad cow case this year and overall eighth
    since 2003.


    https://inspection.canada.ca/en/animal-health/terrestrial-animals/diseases/reportable/canada/confirmed-cases-bse



    Wow. Twenty two years ago.... and they caught it.



    Tsk...

    They have had cases since then, you lying asshat.


    Three in Canada. That is half as many as in the US. ,,, lying asshat

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bryan Simmons@bryangsimmons@gmail.com to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 19:38:53 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 12/2/2025 3:38 PM, Ed P wrote:
    On 12/2/2025 4:12 PM, lomonosov wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 12:42:01 -0700
    Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    President Spray-tan
    has made it too difficult to deliver to the USA at the moment.

    Has he really?

    At first blush you might think so:

    "Wood and furniture products: There are new tariffs on certain wood and
    furniture products. Softwood lumber: 10% duty
    Upholstered wooden products: 25% duty
    Kitchen cabinets and vanities: 25% duty, with plans to increase to 50%
    in 2026"

    I don't see wood bowls listed.

    They're 'art' objects imoh.

    AI Overview
    "Shipping artwork from a Canadian small business to the USA involves
    potential tariffs, as the previous duty-free de minimis exemption for
    shipments under $800 USD has been eliminated. However, //original
    artworks are generally duty-free, and Canadian-made items may be exempt
    from new tariffs// if they meet the conditions of the United
    States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). "

    I think you just don't want to do the legwork on this, so much easier to
    blame Trump than Carney the protectionist barker, isn't it?


    You make it sound simple, but it is not.  Yes, the blame goes to the guy that started the tariffs.  Small businesses are getting hurt, as well as buyers.  I can no longer buy from a favorite source.

    Ed, you are arguing with a Russian asset. Russia sponsored Trump, so
    Trump is also a Russian asset.
    --
    --Bryan https://www.instagram.com/bryangsimmons/

    For your safety and protection, this sig. has been thoroughly
    tested on laboratory animals.

    "Most of the food described here is nauseating.
    We're just too courteous to say so."
    -- Cindy Hamilton
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bryan Simmons@bryangsimmons@gmail.com to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 20:17:52 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 12/3/2025 4:37 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
    On 2025-12-03, Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    Isn't a lot of US milk tainted from the use of growth hormones?

    About 15%. It's pretty easy to find milk labeled "rBHT-free",
    "rBST-free" or "from cows not treated with artificial hormones".

    The cheapest milk at my grocery store is hormone-free.

    Of course, with milk that's _in_ things, you can't tell.

    Growth hormone doesn't "taint" the milk. The only downside is possibly additional stress on the cows. People don't know shit about much.
    --
    --Bryan https://www.instagram.com/bryangsimmons/

    For your safety and protection, this sig. has been thoroughly
    tested on laboratory animals.

    "Most of the food described here is nauseating.
    We're just too courteous to say so."
    -- Cindy Hamilton
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Wed Dec 3 22:17:41 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 20:21:38 -0500
    Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:
    On 2025-12-03 7:31 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 19:20:03 -0500
    Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:

    On 2025-12-03 6:24 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 18:15:07 -0500
    Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:

    On 2025-12-03 6:06 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 15:14:17 -0700
    Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    On 2025-12-03 12:08 p.m., Dave Smith wrote:
    On 2025-12-03 12:47 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 18:29:42 -0500
    jmquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net> wrote:

    Thanks, Ed!! I'm really glad that you are using the scoop. >>>>>>>>>> I delivered some tea caddies to the Tea Trader the other >>>>>>>>>> day and President Spray-tan has made it too difficult to >>>>>>>>>> deliver to the USA at the moment. Not only that but Canada >>>>>>>>>> Post informed me that if I were to send a xmas present to >>>>>>>>>> someone in the USA, I would have to pay the duty up front! >>>>>>>>>> Of course, that doesn't affect commercial operations but >>>>>>>>>> apparently the paperwork is a nightmare.

    That's so sad.  Those tariffs are ridiculous.

    Jill

    That's so sense of you, and him.

    Those milk and steel tariffs Canajia imposes on America don't >>>>>>>> enter your flat and empty head, now do they?

    Try looking at the time line. Canada put tariffs on American
    steel in response to the tariffs that Trump slapped in
    Canadian steel and aluminum.  The tariffs  on dairy  are in >>>>>>> accordance with our supply management system through which we
    maintain stability in the agricultural system.  It enures a
    constant supply of farm products and stabilized prices.  The
    US, OTOH, heavily subsidizes farmers. Those subsidies leave
    them with surplus products that they would love to dump on
    foreign markets.

    Tariff keeps whining about 300% tariffs on American dairy but
    there has never been any paid. It is not an across the boar
    tariff. There is a tariff rate quota system that provides for
    a quota of American dairy products that can be imported duty
    free. It is only when that quota has been exceeded that
    tariffs would be applied. They have never come close to
    reaching that quota.


    Isn't a lot of US milk tainted from the use of growth
    hormones?

    Lose an argument, deploy red herrings.

    What red herring?

    Yours.

    This was about tariffs and dumping after all.

    There is a significant percentage of American milk
    that has come from cows that had been treated with artificial
    hormones.


    Yeah ...so?

    Should it be tariffed out of the market?

    You going to go after that BSE-laden Alberta beef next?

    https://www.thedairysite.com/news/58/alberta-hotspot-for-mad-cow-disease-says-r-calf

    ALBERTA - The Canadian Food Inspection Agency confirmed the
    detection of the country's eighth case of bovine spongiform
    encephalopathy (BSE), or mad cow disease in an Alberta beef cow.
    This is Canada's fifth mad cow case this year and overall eighth
    since 2003.


    https://inspection.canada.ca/en/animal-health/terrestrial-animals/diseases/reportable/canada/confirmed-cases-bse



    Wow. Twenty two years ago.... and they caught it.



    Tsk...

    They have had cases since then, you lying asshat.


    Three in Canada. That is half as many as in the US. ,,, lying asshat

    Tariff avoider, LOL, this is a delish lap dance of red herrings, lol!
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Cindy Hamilton@chamilton5280@invalid.com to rec.food.cooking on Thu Dec 4 09:53:21 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 2025-12-03, Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:
    On 2025-12-03 5:14 p.m., Graham wrote:
    On 2025-12-03 12:08 p.m., Dave Smith wrote:

    Tariff keeps whining about 300% tariffs on American dairy but there
    has never been any paid. It is not an across the boar tariff. There is
    a tariff rate quota system that provides for a quota of American dairy
    products that can be imported duty free. It is only when that quota
    has been exceeded that tariffs would be applied. They have never come
    close to reaching that quota.


    Isn't a lot of US milk tainted from the use of growth hormones?

    That is what I have heard.

    From whom? What is their evidence?

    I know people who whine about hormones in chicken

    Hormone treatment of chickens has been illegal in the U.S. since
    the 1950s.

    Prophylactic treatment with antibiotics is legal, but their
    use has been declining.
    --
    Cindy Hamilton
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Cindy Hamilton@chamilton5280@invalid.com to rec.food.cooking on Thu Dec 4 09:53:52 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 2025-12-03, Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:
    On 2025-12-03 6:06 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 15:14:17 -0700
    Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    On 2025-12-03 12:08 p.m., Dave Smith wrote:
    On 2025-12-03 12:47 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 18:29:42 -0500
    jmquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net> wrote:

    Thanks, Ed!! I'm really glad that you are using the scoop. I
    delivered some tea caddies to the Tea Trader the other day and
    President Spray-tan has made it too difficult to deliver to the
    USA at the moment. Not only that but Canada Post informed me
    that if I were to send a xmas present to someone in the USA, I
    would have to pay the duty up front! Of course, that doesn't
    affect commercial operations but apparently the paperwork is a
    nightmare.

    That's so sad.  Those tariffs are ridiculous.

    Jill

    That's so sense of you, and him.

    Those milk and steel tariffs Canajia imposes on America don't
    enter your flat and empty head, now do they?

    Try looking at the time line. Canada put tariffs on American steel
    in response to the tariffs that Trump slapped in Canadian steel and
    aluminum.  The tariffs  on dairy  are in accordance with our supply >>>> management system through which we maintain stability in the
    agricultural system.  It enures a constant supply of farm products
    and stabilized prices.  The US, OTOH, heavily subsidizes farmers.
    Those subsidies leave them with surplus products that they would
    love to dump on foreign markets.

    Tariff keeps whining about 300% tariffs on American dairy but there
    has never been any paid. It is not an across the boar tariff. There
    is a tariff rate quota system that provides for a quota of American
    dairy products that can be imported duty free. It is only when that
    quota has been exceeded that tariffs would be applied. They have
    never come close to reaching that quota.


    Isn't a lot of US milk tainted from the use of growth hormones?

    Lose an argument, deploy red herrings.

    What red herring? There is a significant percentage of American milk
    that has come from cows that had been treated with artificial hormones.

    What percentage? If you don't know, how can you say it's
    "significant"?
    --
    Cindy Hamilton
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dave Smith@adavid.smith@sympatico.ca to rec.food.cooking on Thu Dec 4 09:16:40 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 2025-12-04 4:53 a.m., Cindy Hamilton wrote:
    On 2025-12-03, Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:
    On 2025-12-03 6:06 p.m., lomonosov wrote:

    Lose an argument, deploy red herrings.

    What red herring? There is a significant percentage of American milk
    that has come from cows that had been treated with artificial hormones.

    What percentage? If you don't know, how can you say it's
    "significant"?


    Several sites placed it at 20% or more.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From =?UTF-8?B?ICggzaF+IM2cypYgzaHCsCk=?=@yo@yo.invalid to rec.food.cooking on Thu Dec 4 10:34:48 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    Dave Smith wrote:
    On 2025-12-04 4:53 a.m., Cindy Hamilton wrote:
    On 2025-12-03, Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:
    On 2025-12-03 6:06 p.m., lomonosov wrote:

    Lose an argument, deploy red herrings.

    What red herring?  There is a significant percentage of American milk
    that has come from cows that had been treated with artificial hormones.

    What percentage?  If you don't know, how can you say it's
    "significant"?


    Several sites placed it at 20% or more.


    Canaduh saves its whore moans for the beef.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Thu Dec 4 08:39:53 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 09:16:40 -0500
    Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:

    On 2025-12-04 4:53 a.m., Cindy Hamilton wrote:
    On 2025-12-03, Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:
    On 2025-12-03 6:06 p.m., lomonosov wrote:

    Lose an argument, deploy red herrings.

    What red herring? There is a significant percentage of American
    milk that has come from cows that had been treated with artificial
    hormones.

    What percentage? If you don't know, how can you say it's
    "significant"?


    Several sites placed it at 20% or more.

    Yet you can't seem to cite them, wotta surprise!

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Thu Dec 4 08:40:23 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 10:34:48 -0500
    ( ͡~ ͜ʖ ͡°) <yo@yo.invalid> wrote:
    Dave Smith wrote:
    On 2025-12-04 4:53 a.m., Cindy Hamilton wrote:
    On 2025-12-03, Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:
    On 2025-12-03 6:06 p.m., lomonosov wrote:

    Lose an argument, deploy red herrings.

    What red herring?  There is a significant percentage of American
    milk that has come from cows that had been treated with
    artificial hormones.

    What percentage?  If you don't know, how can you say it's
    "significant"?


    Several sites placed it at 20% or more.


    Canaduh saves its whore moans for the beef.
    Mmmm...spongy alberta beefwits!
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dave Smith@adavid.smith@sympatico.ca to rec.food.cooking on Thu Dec 4 11:00:37 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On 2025-12-04 10:39 a.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 09:16:40 -0500
    Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:

    What percentage? If you don't know, how can you say it's
    "significant"?


    Several sites placed it at 20% or more.

    Yet you can't seem to cite them, wotta surprise!


    If you weren't a moron you could easily Google it. Therein lies the
    problem.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From lomonosov@bubbles@in.valid to rec.food.cooking on Thu Dec 4 11:45:50 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 11:00:37 -0500
    Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:

    On 2025-12-04 10:39 a.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 09:16:40 -0500
    Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:

    What percentage? If you don't know, how can you say it's
    "significant"?


    Several sites placed it at 20% or more.

    Yet you can't seem to cite them, wotta surprise!


    If you weren't a moron you could easily Google it. Therein lies the
    problem.


    Yes officer dave...I, like so many others, refuse to to take your
    negative claims at face value, nor do we feel the slightest bit
    encumbered to complete and post your research citations for you here,
    you big crybaby.

    For a man of your advanced years you still demonstrate wincingly painful
    levels of low national self esteem and of course the requisite
    narcicism to bury your debate inadequacies in the collective uselesnet
    litter box under a fresh layer of defelctionary preferences babble.

    Ironic (only slightly) that Trump literally owns your nationalist head
    space, whilst Bryan's Tourettes grade fulminations deeply offend your
    otherwise more restrained patois.

    That you lumped me with them speaks volumes as my barbs are delivered
    with factual underpinnings, not buckets of bluster nor graphically crass name-calling.

    That said, no wonder they call you Guts Griping.




    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Hank Rogers@Hank@nospam.invalid to rec.food.cooking on Thu Dec 4 18:39:54 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    Cindy Hamilton wrote on 12/4/2025 3:53 AM:
    On 2025-12-03, Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:
    On 2025-12-03 6:06 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 15:14:17 -0700
    Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> wrote:

    On 2025-12-03 12:08 p.m., Dave Smith wrote:
    On 2025-12-03 12:47 p.m., lomonosov wrote:
    On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 18:29:42 -0500
    jmquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net> wrote:

    Thanks, Ed!! I'm really glad that you are using the scoop. I
    delivered some tea caddies to the Tea Trader the other day and >>>>>>>> President Spray-tan has made it too difficult to deliver to the >>>>>>>> USA at the moment. Not only that but Canada Post informed me
    that if I were to send a xmas present to someone in the USA, I >>>>>>>> would have to pay the duty up front! Of course, that doesn't
    affect commercial operations but apparently the paperwork is a >>>>>>>> nightmare.

    That's so sad.  Those tariffs are ridiculous.

    Jill

    That's so sense of you, and him.

    Those milk and steel tariffs Canajia imposes on America don't
    enter your flat and empty head, now do they?

    Try looking at the time line. Canada put tariffs on American steel
    in response to the tariffs that Trump slapped in Canadian steel and
    aluminum.  The tariffs  on dairy  are in accordance with our supply >>>>> management system through which we maintain stability in the
    agricultural system.  It enures a constant supply of farm products
    and stabilized prices.  The US, OTOH, heavily subsidizes farmers.
    Those subsidies leave them with surplus products that they would
    love to dump on foreign markets.

    Tariff keeps whining about 300% tariffs on American dairy but there
    has never been any paid. It is not an across the boar tariff. There
    is a tariff rate quota system that provides for a quota of American
    dairy products that can be imported duty free. It is only when that
    quota has been exceeded that tariffs would be applied. They have
    never come close to reaching that quota.


    Isn't a lot of US milk tainted from the use of growth hormones?

    Lose an argument, deploy red herrings.

    What red herring? There is a significant percentage of American milk
    that has come from cows that had been treated with artificial hormones.

    What percentage? If you don't know, how can you say it's
    "significant"?


    Officer dave is in canada and doesn't have access to some info. No
    problem though, he can pull shit out of his ass or fabricate what he needs.

    Rest assured we are safe as long as the good Officer is watching over us.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Hank Rogers@Hank@nospam.invalid to rec.food.cooking on Thu Dec 4 18:42:05 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

    Dave Smith wrote on 12/4/2025 8:16 AM:
    On 2025-12-04 4:53 a.m., Cindy Hamilton wrote:
    On 2025-12-03, Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote:
    On 2025-12-03 6:06 p.m., lomonosov wrote:

    Lose an argument, deploy red herrings.

    What red herring? There is a significant percentage of American milk
    that has come from cows that had been treated with artificial hormones.

    What percentage? If you don't know, how can you say it's
    "significant"?


    Several sites placed it at 20% or more.

    You provided no cites, officer?

    Damn. I expected better. Ask Megatron to bail you out.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2