From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

PGP Is A FREE Download - Stay Safe & Stay Encrypted

Instructions for "newbies" get it here...

https://gpg4usb.org/



--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

Encrypt Now once wrote:

PGP Is A FREE Download - Stay Safe & Stay Encrypted

Instructions for "newbies" get it here...

https://gpg4usb.org/

Why should one use an old PGP program from third parties
no one knows and which is not signed by "their" certified
public keys, when not supporting ECC keys, people are using
and which (GnuPG 1.4.9) must be no longer been used, according
to gnupg.org?

And why do you not suggest Kleopatra, or better yubicrypt or
seced, which are both leaving no traces?

https://www.openpgp.org/software/kleopatra/ https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/yubicrypt
https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/seced
--
sent with NymVPN and nym-socks5-client
via Nym Mixnet with Nym Mailer
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

And why do you not suggest Kleopatra, or better yubicrypt or
seced, which are both leaving no traces?

I think the portability is cool!

gpg4usb is a lightweight Windows application built specifically for
helping you write text messages and protect the information by
setting up passwords.

The advantages of being portable...

Since this is a portable program, it is important to mention that it
doesn’t leave any traces in the Windows Registry.

You can copy it on any USB flash drive or other devices, and take it
with you whenever you need to encrypt your information with the aid
of public keys on the breeze, without having to go through
installation steps.

more...

https://www.softpedia.com/get/Security/Encrypting/gpg4usb.shtml

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

You can copy it on any USB flash drive or other devices, and take it
with you whenever you need to encrypt your information with the aid
of public keys on the breeze, without having to go through
installation steps. >https://www.softpedia.com/get/Security/Encrypting/gpg4usb.shtml

Both Windows & Linux...

Germania Blog: https://germania.so/en/posts/pgp-gpg4usb/

Cebulka Blog: https://cebulka.in/en/posts/pgp-gpg4usb/

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

Online PGP encryption editors...

https://pgp.utils.com/

https://8gwifi.org/pgpencdec.jsp

https://onlinepgp.com/

https://pgptool.dev/

https://www.infyways.com/tools/pgp-encryptor/

https://encryptalotta.com/




--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

Free Online PGP Encryption Editor <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> wrote:

Online PGP encryption editors...

https://pgp.utils.com/

https://8gwifi.org/pgpencdec.jsp

https://onlinepgp.com/

https://pgptool.dev/

https://www.infyways.com/tools/pgp-encryptor/

https://encryptalotta.com/

Online encryption? Bad advice. Gabx, is it you?

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

Nym Mailer <noreply@oc2mx.net> wrote:

Encrypt Now once wrote:

PGP Is A FREE Download - Stay Safe & Stay Encrypted

Instructions for "newbies" get it here...

https://gpg4usb.org/

Why should one use an old PGP program from third parties
no one knows and which is not signed by "their" certified
public keys, when not supporting ECC keys, people are using
and which (GnuPG 1.4.9) must be no longer been used, according
to gnupg.org?

And why do you not suggest Kleopatra, or better yubicrypt or
seced, which are both leaving no traces?

https://www.openpgp.org/software/kleopatra/ >https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/yubicrypt
https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/seced

"Subject: Subject:"?

That's what happens when you copy & paste messages by yourself with a
low-level editor. And that's why we have the OmniMix proxy server,
which works perfectly with the standard mail & Usenet client you're
accustomed to use, not to mention the superiority of type 2 remailing.

<https://danner-net.de/om.htm>

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

Fritz Wuehler once wrote:

Nym Mailer <noreply@oc2mx.net> wrote:

Encrypt Now once wrote:

PGP Is A FREE Download - Stay Safe & Stay Encrypted

Instructions for "newbies" get it here...

https://gpg4usb.org/

Why should one use an old PGP program from third parties
no one knows and which is not signed by "their" certified
public keys, when not supporting ECC keys, people are using
and which (GnuPG 1.4.9) must be no longer been used, according
to gnupg.org?

And why do you not suggest Kleopatra, or better yubicrypt or
seced, which are both leaving no traces?

https://www.openpgp.org/software/kleopatra/ https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/yubicrypt https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/seced

"Subject: Subject:"?

That's what happens when you copy & paste messages by yourself with a low-level editor. And that's why we have the OmniMix proxy server,
which works perfectly with the standard mail & Usenet client you're accustomed to use, not to mention the superiority of type 2 remailing.

<https://danner-net.de/om.htm>

Since when is outdated OmniMix TypeII remailing superior,
compared to the state-of-the-art Onion Courier Mixnet in >2025,
when it comes to anonymous communication?

Nobody with a brain would use a Windows GUI program, with
a collection of non self-written tools, from a Nazi Ukraine
supporter, on his superior Tails, Whonix or Qubes workstation.

https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/oc

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

Online encryption? Bad advice.

Agreed, not for sensitive stuff and I certainly would
not use it to discuss with my friends about our next
bank robbery! lol

Might be good for "newbies" to dip their toes in the
water and learn about PGP encrypting for themselves.
They could use it for non-sensitive stuff like love
letters, family get togethers, secret recipes etc.

I'm using the offline gpg4usb portable pgp editor on
a usb drive and it works splendidly! Get it here...

https://www.softpedia.com/get/Security/Encrypting/gpg4usb.shtml

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

Radio Eriwan <bounce.me@radio-eriwan.ru> wrote:

Since when is outdated OmniMix TypeII remailing superior,

This post is not about remailing, it's about ENCRYPTION!!!

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

Person Of Interest wrote:

Radio Eriwan <bounce.me@radio-eriwan.ru> wrote:

Since when is outdated OmniMix TypeII remailing superior,

This post is not about remailing, it's about ENCRYPTION!!!

Tell that the OmniMix looser in article: <20251207.153907.2a1ad639@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
and not me!

BTW. since this thread is about encryption. The majority
of PGP users have already long ago switched to age, for
example, because of it's ease of use or they switched to
yubicrypt or seced, due to their GUI support.

Nobody needs pgp4usb, from unknown people, without signing
their work, nor does it support modern algos or symmetric
encryption and most important outdated OpenPGP crap has
metadata in its file format, which is an absolutely no-go
when it comes to anonymous communications.

And BTW #2, what does this crap OP has to do with rec.food.cooking
and misc.phone.mobile.iphone, because no one needs a *cooking*
recipe for this old PGP crap nor can iPhone users use the old
PGP crap.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

Radio Eriwan <bounce.me@radio-eriwan.ru> mumbled:

The majority of PGP users have already long ago switched

It must be good as it's the go to encryption for the dark net.

What is Gpg4usb?

gpg4usb is an open-source encryption software based on GnuPG
that allows users to encrypt, decrypt, sign and verify files,
messages, emails etc. It integrates encryption capabilities
with portable USB drives.

https://sugggest.com/software/gpg4usb

Get it here...

https://www.softpedia.com/get/Security/Encrypting/gpg4usb.shtml

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

In article <20251207.153907.2a1ad639@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> Fritz
Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-202512.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> wrote:

Nym Mailer <noreply@oc2mx.net> wrote:

Encrypt Now once wrote:

PGP Is A FREE Download - Stay Safe & Stay Encrypted

Instructions for "newbies" get it here...

https://gpg4usb.org/

Why should one use an old PGP program from third parties
no one knows and which is not signed by "their" certified
public keys, when not supporting ECC keys, people are using
and which (GnuPG 1.4.9) must be no longer been used, according
to gnupg.org?

And why do you not suggest Kleopatra, or better yubicrypt or
seced, which are both leaving no traces?

https://www.openpgp.org/software/kleopatra/ >>https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/yubicrypt >>https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/seced

"Subject: Subject:"?

That's what happens when you copy & paste messages by yourself with a >low-level editor. And that's why we have the OmniMix proxy server,
which works perfectly with the standard mail & Usenet client you're >accustomed to use, not to mention the superiority of type 2 remailing.

<https://danner-net.de/om.htm>

100% accurate formatting
100% time saving
100% reliable delivery
100% secure anonymity
100% transparent programs
100% non-profit services

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

Radio Eriwan <bounce.me@radio-eriwan.ru> wrote:

Nobody with a brain would use a Windows GUI program, with
a collection of non self-written tools, from a Nazi Ukraine
supporter, on his superior Tails, Whonix or Qubes workstation.

https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/oc

Better use an advanced and secure Windows proxy server with a
comfortable GUI and IDE availability that over nearly two decades
showed no weakness at all and was created by a well-known person of
integrity than trusting the hacks of some notoriously lying fascist
anonymous with dollar signs in his eyes, who's kissing Putin's ass.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

Anonymous <nobody@yamn.paranoici.org> wrote:

I have and drive a vehicle that is 31 years old. Since it is
outdated, should I throw it away and not trust it anymore? No. It is
still a good vehicle and runs great. It is foolish to always condemn
and not trust a program just because it is old. So who is it anyway to >judge a program to be outdated and unsafe just because it hasn't been >updated for x number of years? Software is not a mechanical devise
that wear

Well said. I still haven't heard of any PGP program being cracked yet!

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

OmniMixer once wrote:

Radio Eriwan <bounce.me@radio-eriwan.ru> wrote:

Nobody with a brain would use a Windows GUI program, with
a collection of non self-written tools, from a Nazi Ukraine
supporter, on his superior Tails, Whonix or Qubes workstation.

https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/oc

Better use an advanced and secure Windows proxy server with a
comfortable GUI and IDE availability that over nearly two decades
showed no weakness at all and was created by a well-known person of
integrity than trusting the hacks of some notoriously lying fascist
anonymous with dollar signs in his eyes, who's kissing Putin's ass.

OmniMix is an excellent museum piece that shows today's youth how their
fathers and grandfathers communicated anonymously in the past and should therefore definitely be preserved for educational purposes.

However, the days of Type II remailing with Tor are long gone, as it can
be proven beyond doubt with autonomous, sophisticated AI monitoring who uploaded fixed-sized payloads to the Tor network at what exact time and
where, and who the recipients of the messages are. As a result, mature
men and women no longer use this Type II technology and have switched to decentralized Onion Courier Mixnets, which they set up and operate themselves.


--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

Stupis Claas wrote:

OmniMixer once wrote:

Radio Eriwan <bounce.me@radio-eriwan.ru> wrote:

Nobody with a brain would use a Windows GUI program, with
a collection of non self-written tools, from a Nazi Ukraine
supporter, on his superior Tails, Whonix or Qubes workstation.

https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/oc

Better use an advanced and secure Windows proxy server with a
comfortable GUI and IDE availability that over nearly two decades
showed no weakness at all and was created by a well-known person of
integrity than trusting the hacks of some notoriously lying fascist
anonymous with dollar signs in his eyes, who's kissing Putin's ass.

OmniMix is an excellent museum piece that shows today's youth how their >fathers and grandfathers communicated anonymously in the past and should >therefore definitely be preserved for educational purposes.

However, the days of Type II remailing with Tor are long gone, as it can
be proven beyond doubt with autonomous, sophisticated AI monitoring who >uploaded fixed-sized payloads to the Tor network at what exact time and >where, and who the recipients of the messages are.

The next lie of that psycho.

As a result, mature
men and women no longer use this Type II technology and have switched to >decentralized Onion Courier Mixnets, which they set up and operate themselves.

A private network for family and friends that all of a sudden provides anonymity, which he himself once admitted to be a wrong assumption.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

An OmniMix user wrote:

Stupis Claas wrote:

OmniMixer once wrote:

Radio Eriwan <bounce.me@radio-eriwan.ru> wrote:

Nobody with a brain would use a Windows GUI program, with
a collection of non self-written tools, from a Nazi Ukraine
supporter, on his superior Tails, Whonix or Qubes workstation.

https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/oc

Better use an advanced and secure Windows proxy server with a comfortable GUI and IDE availability that over nearly two decades
showed no weakness at all and was created by a well-known person of integrity than trusting the hacks of some notoriously lying fascist anonymous with dollar signs in his eyes, who's kissing Putin's ass.

OmniMix is an excellent museum piece that shows today's youth how their fathers and grandfathers communicated anonymously in the past and should therefore definitely be preserved for educational purposes.

However, the days of Type II remailing with Tor are long gone, as it can
be proven beyond doubt with autonomous, sophisticated AI monitoring who uploaded fixed-sized payloads to the Tor network at what exact time and where, and who the recipients of the messages are.

The next lie of that psycho.

Says an OmniMix cry baby!

As a result, mature
men and women no longer use this Type II technology and have switched to decentralized Onion Courier Mixnets, which they set up and operate themselves.

A private network for family and friends that all of a sudden provides anonymity, which he himself once admitted to be a wrong assumption.

Message-ID?

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.food.cooking

Shithead Claas wrote:

However, the days of Type II remailing with Tor are long gone, as it can >> > be proven beyond doubt with autonomous, sophisticated AI monitoring who
uploaded fixed-sized payloads to the Tor network at what exact time and
where, and who the recipients of the messages are.

The next lie of that psycho.

Says an OmniMix cry baby!

No matter who exposed you, an anonymous, it's simply the truth.

You're lying whenever you touch your keyboard. It must be hard
to realize that everything you create is insecure bullsh*t, and
it must be even harder to be confronted with that obvious fact.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2